Speaker:

Welcome to Impact Quantum where we decode the quantum universe

Speaker:

one qubit at a time. In this episode, Frank and

Speaker:

Candice sit down with Anna White, president of Daikon,

Speaker:

and the innovative mind behind Hito Match. Forget

Speaker:

what you think you know about dating apps. This one's powered by quantum

Speaker:

algorithms and AI hybrids that predict human

Speaker:

behavior. Yes. Really. From matchmaking

Speaker:

to medical tech, Anna takes us on a journey into how

Speaker:

quantum computing isn't just for labs or physicists

Speaker:

anymore. It's here. It's real, and it's solving problems

Speaker:

in ways classical computing simply can't. If you've ever

Speaker:

wondered what happens when you combine a light bulb, a candle,

Speaker:

and a multiverse, you're in for a treat. Now here's some

Speaker:

dubstep.

Speaker:

Hello, and welcome back to Impact Quantum, the podcast where we explore the emergent

Speaker:

fields of quantum computing and talk about

Speaker:

the upcoming and burgeoning quantum ecosystem.

Speaker:

And really encourage those who are curious about quantum computing to really start

Speaker:

diving in now because this really is gonna be a major industry that will

Speaker:

rival, the semiconductor industry and the software

Speaker:

boom, that followed that. Candace, I still have to

Speaker:

work on that intro. But let me introduce my co host,

Speaker:

Candace Guhulle, who is probably the most quantum curious person I know.

Speaker:

I think she got into quantum computing because somehow we were talking about

Speaker:

factoring primes and security. And then she's like, you should

Speaker:

really restart that podcast you had. And I was like, I don't know.

Speaker:

And then she's very persistent, and here we are. Hi.

Speaker:

Thank you for I love the introduction. I'll take it. It's great.

Speaker:

It's great. No. Look. I'm really loving what we're doing and who we're talking

Speaker:

to. It's just it's so enlightening. And every

Speaker:

conversation we have, we find out that at least

Speaker:

I find out I don't know nearly enough, and I need to know more, and

Speaker:

there's so much more to find out. It's just so exciting. Oh, I love it.

Speaker:

I love it. Today, we're lucky enough to meet, with Anna

Speaker:

White. She is the president of

Speaker:

Daikon, and also, HidoMatch.

Speaker:

And we had a pre conversation with her, and what they are doing at

Speaker:

Hedo Match is oh my gosh. It is so

Speaker:

exciting that we keep on trying not to talk about it when we talk to

Speaker:

other people because, like, we feel like we're, like, in, like, the secret in, like,

Speaker:

in, like, the secret club. Like, it's really, really it's it's great. So,

Speaker:

Anna, so thank you so much for joining us today. Thank you.

Speaker:

Yes. I mean, I think, most of the time when we're

Speaker:

talking with people, nobody really understands the different

Speaker:

type of ways that you can utilize quantum. We just

Speaker:

decided to do it, a very, very different way than

Speaker:

everybody else. So the biggest

Speaker:

What's the difference? Sorry. I cut you off. But, like, what how how what's your

Speaker:

approach? So I think the biggest thing is there's a

Speaker:

few different companies that are working on building out algorithms

Speaker:

on quantum. The different approach we chose to take

Speaker:

was to deploy the application first and then

Speaker:

build out the algorithms. But since we already have that app built

Speaker:

out, we're able to input the data while we're building out the

Speaker:

algorithms, which nobody else is really doing it that way.

Speaker:

So we have a few different algorithms that we've already built out and

Speaker:

they are, quantum algorithms and currently running on

Speaker:

quantum hardware. And the first one is a

Speaker:

quantum and AI hybrid. And we use that

Speaker:

to be able to predict human behavior. And,

Speaker:

so we have a personality test on the app, and we use

Speaker:

that based on, the personality, the interest.

Speaker:

That's how we're offering the matches. So Interesting.

Speaker:

Yes. So that was the first one, and that is, using

Speaker:

different types of onsets and gates. So it's definitely, you

Speaker:

know, bridging both of those technologies of, quantum machine

Speaker:

learning. And that one still is able to operate

Speaker:

on its own compared to AI where you have to keep training

Speaker:

it. This model is is made to be able to train itself and

Speaker:

be able to give the right results every time. Interesting.

Speaker:

So you mentioned you mentioned you you said a lot of things, and I'm like,

Speaker:

I wanna unpack them all because that was a very Yeah.

Speaker:

So one, it sounds like you're a quantum software company.

Speaker:

Yes. That okay. I have a lot of questions about, like, what does quantum

Speaker:

software development look like? Right? Because obviously, there's different types of gates. There's a different

Speaker:

mentality in terms of so one, how do you recruit software engineers?

Speaker:

And if there's anyone in the audience that's like, hey. I'm already a software engineer

Speaker:

or AI engineer. I wanna get into this quantum

Speaker:

space. Those are these are two very small questions

Speaker:

with big answers. But, like, what what have you found has been the major

Speaker:

difference between, like, traditional, software engineering and

Speaker:

quantum based ones. And you you mentioned kind of the underlying gates of

Speaker:

stuff. Mhmm. And I don't even know if kids learn that in comp

Speaker:

sci anymore, honestly. Like, so I'm old enough

Speaker:

I'm old enough that my first computer was a Commodore sixty four. Right? And, when

Speaker:

I went to comp sci, one of the earlier classes was talking about the different

Speaker:

types of gates that are actually embedded in the electronics.

Speaker:

And when I was reading up on quantum

Speaker:

systems, like, there's a whole new families of gates that quantum computing kind of

Speaker:

opens up. So why don't we why don't we go into that? Like, how did

Speaker:

you what do you found has been the big difference between traditional

Speaker:

software engineering and quantum software engineering? Mhmm.

Speaker:

So I would say the biggest thing is, so our CEO,

Speaker:

she's, like, pretty much the main brains of the company.

Speaker:

It was really her initiative a couple years ago

Speaker:

where she wanted to be able to create an algorithm that was like she

Speaker:

wanted to pretty much dissect TikTok's algorithm and figure out how are

Speaker:

they running it that way. And so she was working with somebody that worked for

Speaker:

ByteDance, and that was the biggest thing. It seemed like they were using something

Speaker:

very similar to Quantum at that time. So, I mean, even though

Speaker:

Quantum is hitting now, it seems like they were already kind of somewhat

Speaker:

building out a quantum algorithm at that time. And so she wanted to be

Speaker:

able to build something similar. But I would say based on, like,

Speaker:

the the engineers we've recruited and have been

Speaker:

working with, I think you definitely have to have a balance of both.

Speaker:

You have to have, the background of machine learning,

Speaker:

of of of, software development, all of that.

Speaker:

But the biggest thing is you have to have a balance of science,

Speaker:

like somewhat. You have to really have a deep understanding of science

Speaker:

because the the the thing that made it difficult for people to be

Speaker:

able to use quantum right now or even understand the concept of

Speaker:

it is we went into, classical computing first

Speaker:

instead of, like, you know, which Albert Einstein back in the day was

Speaker:

like, seems like I have a theory here, you know, and and

Speaker:

was was going there, but it never developed,

Speaker:

until now. But because we went into classical,

Speaker:

quantum just seems so theory based, and people can't comprehend that

Speaker:

you can actually utilize it. So I think that was the biggest,

Speaker:

like, difference. Some people that are stuck in the classical and

Speaker:

and stuck on that, like, AI, focus, it's

Speaker:

very hard for them to wrap their brain around the concept of

Speaker:

quantum. And and we've had had that, like, kind of back and forth.

Speaker:

So I like to to use, like, this analogy where, I

Speaker:

kinda consider quantum as, like, a light bulb where it

Speaker:

illuminates automatically. You just turn on the switch. But

Speaker:

AI is somewhat of a like a candle. You have to light it, but

Speaker:

then eventually it burns out, and it can't operate by itself. You

Speaker:

have to keep lighting it. So I think that was the biggest, like,

Speaker:

difference we were trying to explain, but we definitely try

Speaker:

to break through in the AI competitive battleground right now.

Speaker:

Interesting. And and That's gonna be an awesome clip, I just wanna say, like,

Speaker:

right now, I love I love the analogy. Thank you so much.

Speaker:

I'm I'm such a visual learner, that

Speaker:

I I know other people out there really appreciated that too. So I'm sorry. I'm

Speaker:

sorry, Frank. No. I think that's that's a great analogy because I think it also

Speaker:

encapsulate kinda like AI. Right? Like, AI always needs fresh data and to

Speaker:

pump into it for it to do anything, which would be analogous to air. Whereas

Speaker:

with traditional coding systems, you flip a switch. Like and also

Speaker:

traditional computers are, you know, the electricity flows or it doesn't flow. Right? There's

Speaker:

no ambiguity. Right? What's interesting about qubits is that it could be in

Speaker:

any state in between there. And, like, I

Speaker:

remember I like to fancy myself a smart guy.

Speaker:

But, you know, I remember when I first heard of when I first heard of

Speaker:

quantum computing, I'm like, yeah, yeah, that's cute and all. But then when I really

Speaker:

first, like, got it, like a light bulb moment, I remember I was

Speaker:

at an internal Microsoft conference. And I was

Speaker:

an AI conference of all things. And they were talking about hardware, and I'm like,

Speaker:

okay. I get it. Like, I need GPUs, more GPUs. And when those run

Speaker:

out, I just get more GPUs. But,

Speaker:

the presenter, she was like, you know, we could build and use all the GPUs

Speaker:

we want, but, you know, we are hitting a wall in

Speaker:

terms of how we design these, classical systems.

Speaker:

And, you know, quantum computing offers us an opportunity to kinda, like, really

Speaker:

exponentially boost this, because if Moore's law, you

Speaker:

know, will eventually kind of not be a thing.

Speaker:

And I was fascinated with it. And that night, I went back to the hotel,

Speaker:

and I installed the QDK quantum developer kit, like Q and

Speaker:

all that. And then I sat down in front of it. I'm like, okay. Now

Speaker:

what? Like and then I started looking at, like, well, wait. There's all these new

Speaker:

gates. And the last time I really thought deeply

Speaker:

about logic gates and the actual silicon, I mean, Kurt Cobain was still

Speaker:

alive. I think Tupac was still alive too. Right? Like, so,

Speaker:

that was a very, like, you know, jarring moment when I realized, like, you know,

Speaker:

again, I'm lifelong software engineer turned data

Speaker:

scientist. And I even I'm like, I had that, like,

Speaker:

okay. Now what moment? You know? Have you seen others

Speaker:

have that, or am I kind of, like, the special one in the

Speaker:

I think, like, everybody kind of hit that moment. Like, I

Speaker:

think, even for me, honestly, like, I'm a business

Speaker:

person. You know? And when I joined originally,

Speaker:

my, the CEO was just like, yeah. I'm creating a dating app.

Speaker:

I'm like, that's so cool. Like, I joined, you know,

Speaker:

to back her up as far as, like, the business aspect. But then,

Speaker:

like, there was moments where, you know, we were how to, you know, hit

Speaker:

because we originally started with Qiskit, and then we ended up going to

Speaker:

Penny Lane to write the language first, because we kept hitting

Speaker:

walls and there's so much limited information that you have to

Speaker:

try and puzzle together. And at one point, they gave

Speaker:

me an assignment to research colonels, and I'm like,

Speaker:

what am I supposed to do? Like military? Like,

Speaker:

yeah. Yeah. Popcorn kernels. Yeah. Popcorn kernels. Similar

Speaker:

to that. And, so I had to figure out,

Speaker:

you know, pretty much how to, turn the classical

Speaker:

data into, quantum state. And I remember,

Speaker:

like, I was like, how am I supposed to research this?

Speaker:

Instead, I ended up networking with millions of different people.

Speaker:

So I think, you know, the same situation you were in is the same

Speaker:

situation all of the quantum world is in. You know? Because everybody

Speaker:

is trying to figure out certain pieces of it. I just think, like, you know,

Speaker:

based on that, accomplishment we made with our first algorithm

Speaker:

and then our second one, the second one is the first of its kind. Nobody

Speaker:

has done it yet. You know? The we we know of one team that

Speaker:

was working on it in China, but they were working on,

Speaker:

working on it with 15 engineers. And we did it with

Speaker:

two. Interesting. And

Speaker:

No. That's fascinating. Like and and I think also one of the big

Speaker:

hypothesis hypothesis,

Speaker:

I need coffee today, like, really bad, Was

Speaker:

when we rebranded the show, we kinda rebooted the show. It was like to

Speaker:

you know, Candice and I had this conversation. I was like, you know, the quantum

Speaker:

world is gonna need marketers. It's gonna need business people. It's gonna need,

Speaker:

you know, it's gonna need not just quantum physicists. Because I think

Speaker:

one of the consistent theme we had when we started talking to people about restarting

Speaker:

the show was there's already enough quantum physicists in the field.

Speaker:

Yes. Right? What we need now are the

Speaker:

software developers, the marketers, the

Speaker:

PMs, the the, you know, the business line folks that, you

Speaker:

know, to really build it out as an industry. And I think,

Speaker:

that that is where I think for the majority of the population, you don't have

Speaker:

to study quantum physics if you don't want to. Don't be intimidated by the word

Speaker:

quantum. Right? Just get into it. Right? It's gonna be an

Speaker:

adjustment, but anything, you know, like, if you if

Speaker:

you go into a pool in the summer, right, like, you know, the first minute

Speaker:

or two, you're in the water, it's super cold, but then it's very enjoyable. And

Speaker:

I think any any endeavor is gonna be like that, whether it's,

Speaker:

you know, swimming or just even getting in the code and alone for a lot

Speaker:

of people has been was an adjustment. So, you know,

Speaker:

embrace that adjustment adjustment because it probably means you're onto something

Speaker:

that's gonna make you grow. Because it it's true. It's like how

Speaker:

does the business side, the marketing side, you know, we have to be able to

Speaker:

understand it so that we can sell it. We can communicate,

Speaker:

you know, what the unique, the the unique selling, you

Speaker:

know, points are about it, understanding,

Speaker:

you know, what companies need to be involved

Speaker:

and also to be understand what companies really don't need to be involved

Speaker:

because there are quite a few small, you

Speaker:

know, small type companies that don't have to bother.

Speaker:

And, you know, now, yes, do they have to bother in terms of, like, getting

Speaker:

involved with getting encryption from quantum so that their data is safe?

Speaker:

Yes. But do they have to have all their systems work, you know,

Speaker:

on a on a hybrid system? No. But, yeah,

Speaker:

like, how do you how do you explain, you know,

Speaker:

to the marketer to say, you know, this is what, like,

Speaker:

what you're doing with your dating app? And you're getting

Speaker:

people to try it out because you're gathering

Speaker:

additional data to to then go to the next step. So what's the next step

Speaker:

for you guys after you're gathering this information?

Speaker:

So as of right now, kinda where we are at is,

Speaker:

we were kinda holding off on marketing anything, you know, big,

Speaker:

up until we were able to somewhat get a lot of the,

Speaker:

underlining things that we were still developing done. I

Speaker:

think after we created the, last, well,

Speaker:

we're still working on the, very last algorithm,

Speaker:

but, the one that we just created was the facial

Speaker:

recognition on a cupel optimization model. And,

Speaker:

I think after we did that, that's when we started looking for funding.

Speaker:

And, we did, I will go

Speaker:

ahead and announce it because we're getting ready to make that announcement, but we did

Speaker:

hit that pre seed. And, I gotta I gotta say, like, it was

Speaker:

challenging. It was really challenging because, you

Speaker:

know, a lot of people hear of, AI

Speaker:

and a lot of the investors, they just can't comprehend

Speaker:

this, and it just seems like it's so far away. It's just the

Speaker:

fact that we're so small that we couldn't say otherwise, that you can

Speaker:

utilize it, and it is a useful technology. And it is right now.

Speaker:

It's not later. But, you know, there was so much misinformation in

Speaker:

the news that was stating that it's not gonna be ready for five, ten years,

Speaker:

and that's false. You know, it is. But, you know,

Speaker:

I think, the biggest thing for us is is our approach, why we

Speaker:

did it. We get the biggest question, like, well, you couldn't you

Speaker:

do that on a classical computer? You know? And they can't

Speaker:

understand why we used quantum to do it. But the thing is is,

Speaker:

it's the actual method of it that we were utilizing

Speaker:

and learning and building out. And that's the,

Speaker:

biggest discovery that we were able to make because we were able

Speaker:

and I was talking with Candace about that, is we were able to break up

Speaker:

that data into smaller pieces to be able to fit into

Speaker:

a, application. Most of the graph sizes,

Speaker:

you can't use on a classical computer. That's, like, the biggest thing that tells you

Speaker:

that it's a quantum algorithm because that graph can't be used. Because of

Speaker:

the size. It can't be used on a classical computer. So I think,

Speaker:

you know, now we're ready to start that marketing process and start

Speaker:

getting us out there. We also have a couple other things which we can't talk

Speaker:

about, but pretty big things. So are you running

Speaker:

on I'm sorry. I cut you off. No. You're fine. Are you running on

Speaker:

actual quantum hardware, or or is this a quantum inspired

Speaker:

algorithms? Because that's also another thing. So you're going straight to the metal.

Speaker:

Yeah. No. We are currently on quantum hardware. We,

Speaker:

currently are utilizing D Wave, but we're also looking

Speaker:

at other options as far as, like, you know, what can what else,

Speaker:

hardware companies can do pretty much. And that's

Speaker:

what makes, and that's a big difference between AI

Speaker:

writing and, quantum or classical and quantum.

Speaker:

Because when you write out that code for quantum, it's actually

Speaker:

easily trans trans transport, because, you know, D

Speaker:

Wave is on, an a link. IBM is gates. You know,

Speaker:

everybody has their different models. But because of the, the way

Speaker:

you write out the quantum coding, it's actually pretty easy to translate

Speaker:

that language into another system. So the

Speaker:

software layer is pretty agnostic to the underlying Yeah.

Speaker:

Like hardware mechanism because we were talking to somebody who's into photonics and then there's

Speaker:

different like, there's at least four different ways to

Speaker:

work to build a quantum computer system out, which I also think is a as

Speaker:

a major mental shift for a lot of people who grew who are in the

Speaker:

tech industry today. Right? Because it's it's literally in the name, electronics.

Speaker:

Right? You're basically you have, for lack of a better

Speaker:

term, like, little electrons running through a maze you built, like little mice.

Speaker:

And they either flow or they they're either moving or they're not moving. Right?

Speaker:

But with quantum systems, it's not just electrons. Right? There's

Speaker:

you mentioned annealing. There's, photonics. There was another one you

Speaker:

mentioned. And I mean, there's at least five different

Speaker:

contenders now, maybe more. But, and each one

Speaker:

of them has their strengths as it turns out, and each one of them has

Speaker:

their weaknesses. But I find it interesting, and I think that's actually a good news

Speaker:

for a lot of quantum software developers is

Speaker:

the software layer is pretty agnostic about it, it seems like.

Speaker:

Yeah. We were, actually surprised by that. That

Speaker:

was the biggest thing because we started you know, we're

Speaker:

we're small. And so for us to just try and, you know,

Speaker:

get partnerships, it's not as easy as a lot of the other companies that

Speaker:

are, you know, easily getting the partnerships. We have to fight for it.

Speaker:

And, you know, we have to kinda keep proving ourselves. And to be able to

Speaker:

do that, we had to keep rewriting the language to match their

Speaker:

system. So, you know, now I would say, you know, from two

Speaker:

years ago, there wasn't that many options. But I think a lot of the hardware

Speaker:

companies right now are being very diligent on

Speaker:

really getting this technology to be useful for all of

Speaker:

us. We just, you know, decided to use it in a mainstream

Speaker:

environment because that's where the people that don't believe in it,

Speaker:

that's where we need to hit. And so when those kind of people are starting

Speaker:

to use it and can see the type of results, like, for an example, there's

Speaker:

only a twelve percent success rate and a thirteen billion dollar industry in

Speaker:

dating. Wow. That's pretty bad.

Speaker:

That's pretty bad. Oh, and seventy nine percent of those users,

Speaker:

they're burnt out. They're ready to walk away because a lot of those are

Speaker:

using, you know, AI algorithms and that that, you

Speaker:

know, that pairing is not working. You know, that

Speaker:

algorithm is not giving them the best results that they could

Speaker:

potentially get. So, you know, once you you were able

Speaker:

to get into a mainstream area like this, I think you that's when

Speaker:

you get the people and they're that's what hypes that industry.

Speaker:

Absolutely. And there's plenty of plenty of upside for optimization if you're at

Speaker:

12%. Right? Even if you double it and it's

Speaker:

only 24% or 25%, that's you've doubled it.

Speaker:

Like, it's not seems like there could there's a a enormous

Speaker:

opportunity there. I would not have guessed that. Yeah. Well, that's

Speaker:

why we started with that. So our next projects are,

Speaker:

we're going into a traveling app. That's our next very next project.

Speaker:

But then we're going into medical. That's when we wanna

Speaker:

hit the most important fields. I just don't think that,

Speaker:

and this is just the way that we decide to approach it. We don't think

Speaker:

that building out an algorithm and saying it's useful for meta

Speaker:

medicine. I think you need to be very careful about that. So

Speaker:

we chose to build out this algorithm, keep building it and make

Speaker:

it a very strong algorithm, do a different types of way,

Speaker:

building out different data, but then eventually mastering

Speaker:

that algorithm to be 100% certain that it

Speaker:

can help this field. I think, otherwise, I it's

Speaker:

dangerous to me. I just think it's dangerous. No. I I I

Speaker:

like your technique. I mean, I I understand how you're setting up your

Speaker:

strategy because once you dip your toe into something truly medical,

Speaker:

which ideally is there to help a lot of people, you wanna you wanna make

Speaker:

sure that you have everything buttoned up. You know? People's lives are

Speaker:

literally on the line. Like, it Right. Exactly. So that that

Speaker:

sounds legitimately that sounds totally legitimate to me. So that's

Speaker:

exciting. That's exciting. Yeah. And they say that, you know,

Speaker:

quantum does will will have that ability to be able

Speaker:

to unlock so much, benefits for people, things

Speaker:

that we couldn't solve on a classical computer, which, you know,

Speaker:

on our, on our, facial recognition, we

Speaker:

were actually running one test that, we we

Speaker:

ran the same test on a classical, and it took

Speaker:

twenty four hours for us to be able to complete. And then we ran it

Speaker:

on the quantum, and it took us point zero zero eight seconds to be able

Speaker:

to complete. Oh my gosh. So when you start doing that into

Speaker:

encryption, which we're working on our encryption, algorithm

Speaker:

now to to be able to secure the data on the app. That's our very

Speaker:

last one that we're working on. Well, we've got a few, but that's the one

Speaker:

we're working on for right now. Yeah. That's

Speaker:

where where it's gonna be a little bit tricky, and I think that's why a

Speaker:

lot of the, financial institutes are really going

Speaker:

after quantum right now. I don't know. Y'all saw the news about JPMorgan.

Speaker:

That was pretty huge. Yeah. So I wanna talk to you a little bit about

Speaker:

that. Right? I felt that that kinda came a lot of left field.

Speaker:

I did too. But I felt that they really wanted

Speaker:

to kind of state their their dominance early on. Right?

Speaker:

But, yeah, I felt that that was really out of left field, but vitally

Speaker:

important. So go ahead. I'm sorry, Frank. No. A

Speaker:

%. Like and and when one of

Speaker:

the one of the things that kind of, like, maybe I

Speaker:

also kind of saw it from left field, but I was also looking in that

Speaker:

direction because there was a number of, you know, Gartner or

Speaker:

whatever awards for, you know, most quantum ready companies,

Speaker:

blah blah blah blah blah. Right? Was all these

Speaker:

banks. And I just assumed is, you know,

Speaker:

for protection against, post quantum, you know,

Speaker:

quantum, you know, what they call it, y two q, right, where,

Speaker:

conventional encryption will be effectively useless. But, no,

Speaker:

like, there's other use cases. That was the thing that took me from the field.

Speaker:

Like, oh, I guess truly random number generation is a big deal. That's

Speaker:

Oh, yeah. Yeah. Yeah. We're utilizing,

Speaker:

a very specific method in our cryptography

Speaker:

algorithm, which is it's pretty brilliant.

Speaker:

I gotta I gotta say it's pretty brilliant. And, that I

Speaker:

I I think everybody kind of dealing with that is kind of

Speaker:

utilizing so many different methods. And, you know, only time will

Speaker:

tell who ends up having that superior, you know,

Speaker:

algorithm, but I think it it's it's so fun. It's

Speaker:

so, for me, it's fun to sell, but I think it's it's so fun to

Speaker:

be able to start now seeing people come out of the woodworks

Speaker:

and, you know, start getting into it because we started this industry

Speaker:

when nobody was talking about quantum at all. So we started

Speaker:

pitching these to, investors, like, really

Speaker:

early on, and they were like, no. I I don't I

Speaker:

don't I don't get it. You know? For for that

Speaker:

time frame, everybody just wanted to talk about AI, which, you know,

Speaker:

that's why our our actual business, Daikin, one of our,

Speaker:

options that we have is we are working with AI companies to be able to

Speaker:

help them translate that language into a quantum AI

Speaker:

algorithm. Because I think when quantum starts taking off,

Speaker:

it's gonna be a big problem for some of the AI companies to catch up

Speaker:

to. You know? So we did start working with a

Speaker:

couple. There's one robotic. It's it's a medical robotic company, and then there's

Speaker:

one company, and then there's one that,

Speaker:

is is in the medical field as well. But, you know, we just started working

Speaker:

with them as far as negotiating deals on, you know,

Speaker:

doing that. So Interesting. So I think

Speaker:

that really begs the question of, you know, you said you you enjoy doing the

Speaker:

sales in this quantum space. How did you get into the quantum space? Because I

Speaker:

think there's a lot of people, that really wanna get

Speaker:

into this space, but aren't really

Speaker:

sure where to get started. So what would be your advice to them? And

Speaker:

well, one, how'd you get into it? And then what would be your advice to

Speaker:

to to the quantum curious, if you will?

Speaker:

Well, to be honest, like, I'm I'm very close with the

Speaker:

CEO. And so back in the day when she was talking

Speaker:

about this, I just was pretty lost.

Speaker:

You know, the people that are really passionate about this and you

Speaker:

talk to them, that's when you start to learn this. That's when you start to

Speaker:

gain that passion behind it. That was the biggest thing I caught from

Speaker:

Candace when I first spoke with her. She's super passionate about

Speaker:

quantum. Those type of people are the people that will move

Speaker:

this field. And I think that was the biggest

Speaker:

thing I I noticed from her when I first started, you

Speaker:

know, talking with, the CEO of our

Speaker:

company. We like I said, we're very close. We're actually best

Speaker:

friends. Oh, that's cool. That's cool. And I I come from a

Speaker:

total different field, to be honest. I I work in a total

Speaker:

different field. I've worked in business for the last fifteen, twenty years,

Speaker:

and I'm actually, you know, pretty skilled at being able to see the opportunity in

Speaker:

businesses. But I I just recently, you know,

Speaker:

when she started this program, how to start learning about

Speaker:

quantum and start really comprehending how is

Speaker:

this operating. And it's so mind blowing when you

Speaker:

understand the concept. Before you understand it, then you're

Speaker:

just like, I mean, it's interesting, but you're not

Speaker:

passionate about it. But then when you start to

Speaker:

understand how these mechanism are working altogether,

Speaker:

you're mind blown. You're like, you you almost can't believe. You're

Speaker:

you're really actually making something impossible happen

Speaker:

and be possible for people. That's the mind blowing part of this.

Speaker:

So we're in our app, we're able to personalize things for

Speaker:

people that they won't even be able to comprehend because we also have a

Speaker:

shop on there, an ecommerce shop. So not even them will

Speaker:

be able to understand, like, why do I always find things I

Speaker:

love, you know, offer, you know, offer to me? Well, because we

Speaker:

built out that personalization to be able to match the right person.

Speaker:

Like, so we're not offering the red dress to the customer

Speaker:

that would prefer a black dress. So Interesting.

Speaker:

That's what I'm saying. Factors. There's so many different factors to

Speaker:

this. And now I'm sure you can't even imagine that you were

Speaker:

doing whatever it was that you were doing before when you're doing

Speaker:

this now. And it's just so exciting. Right? And it's just

Speaker:

it's fantastic. Right? Like, it's just it's exciting. It's new.

Speaker:

And and no. Not not enough people understand it, but

Speaker:

enough people can learn about it that, and

Speaker:

that can, you know, make it approachable, give them an onboarding,

Speaker:

and say, you know, this is kind of what you need to kind of wrap

Speaker:

your mind around first, and then you can go from there. Like, how you

Speaker:

go to AI companies and you're explaining to them what kind of algorithm

Speaker:

that they're gonna need in order to do something.

Speaker:

And then so and excuse me for not

Speaker:

completely understanding, but, so then when you speak to an

Speaker:

AI company and you say to them, you know, this is this is kind of

Speaker:

what you need. Are you is it the is it the proprietary

Speaker:

algorithm that you guys have come up with that helps them do what they

Speaker:

need to do as well, or do you have to come up with something else

Speaker:

for them specifically? It it kinda

Speaker:

depends on the company. So I think, like, everybody

Speaker:

somewhat has that moment. And, you know, with some of the

Speaker:

AI, companies, they have started having that,

Speaker:

moment. And those were the first ones, but that's why we needed

Speaker:

that investment to be able to hire a couple more,

Speaker:

engineers, and kinda help us back up

Speaker:

that because, you know, if we're focusing on on our main

Speaker:

project, you know, we we do need other people to help with the

Speaker:

building of the algorithms for others if we start getting those AI

Speaker:

companies, and we need to build out separate algorithms for them.

Speaker:

That's why we needed that, investment, and that's why

Speaker:

we wanted to come still keep developing, not

Speaker:

just for the app, but keep developing as it is, this technology.

Speaker:

For an example, Tinder, they use about

Speaker:

$96,000,000 on, developers a

Speaker:

year. Our app, actually, we're running with one developer.

Speaker:

That's why we're able to have that extra time to be able to build

Speaker:

out other algorithms, you know, and and practice. Like

Speaker:

cryptography, like, you know, that came left left field. We were like, well, let's

Speaker:

just let's see what we can do because we saw everybody was kinda talking about

Speaker:

it. And the approach that they ended up going into

Speaker:

like, I don't know, like, technical too much, but the way it was

Speaker:

explained, I was mind blown. Completely mind blown.

Speaker:

I wanna sit in her office for, like, a week and just listen to

Speaker:

everything. I just wanna sit there and listen to everything that's going

Speaker:

on and just learn, learn, learn. I'm like, oh. I'm like,

Speaker:

Anna doesn't know how much how close friends we're gonna become. She doesn't know that

Speaker:

yet. Well, you know, just like Frank was saying

Speaker:

when he was, you know, reading and then, you know, he he was, like,

Speaker:

starting to get into everybody kinda goes through that moment. And

Speaker:

I even had to go through that moment when, you know, I was reading

Speaker:

it, learning it from them when I was given kernels to go

Speaker:

research, which I cheated. I will I will admit, I

Speaker:

I definitely cheated that. I reached out to a million

Speaker:

different physics of the quantum field,

Speaker:

IBM. Like, I reached out to so many people. That's

Speaker:

not cheating. That's networking. I'm so as a marketer, that's the first thing

Speaker:

I would have thought to do. Oh, good to say. Plus you're in sales. Right?

Speaker:

Like, that's just your job. Like You know? Yeah. But but it is originally, they

Speaker:

gave me books to read. I have Oh, yeah. Okay. Articles.

Speaker:

And I and so I read it, and I'm like, let me put this in

Speaker:

chat g p t. And then I was like, let me never let me

Speaker:

talk to people because I actually, like, I I got so much

Speaker:

feedback from a lot of different people. I had a filter before I gave it

Speaker:

to them what was, able to actually be

Speaker:

utilized and what wasn't. And and even coming

Speaker:

from a field where I I did not have that background, I was

Speaker:

at least able to figure that out. I mean, that's what I was saying. Like,

Speaker:

that's the biggest scale that I would say that I have. I'm I'm pretty good

Speaker:

at building that opportunity, figuring out what that opportunity is in a

Speaker:

business. So I had to figure out the same situation with those colonels. I

Speaker:

had to figure out what was the key and then hand over the

Speaker:

key. While they were building out all the most complicated

Speaker:

portions of it, I had to do, like, more of the easy parts.

Speaker:

I the name of the book escapes me. I was trying to look it up

Speaker:

in my Amazon order history, but I apparently actually bought it from Barnes and Noble.

Speaker:

So the

Speaker:

the thing that helped me the most was a book about the history of quantum

Speaker:

physics. Right? And it was, like, one of the things I read was when I

Speaker:

was going through, like, the different gates and stuff like that, and I was like,

Speaker:

you know, who there was a poly gate. There's poly x, y,

Speaker:

and z. I'm like, who is this poly guy? Like, why is why is this

Speaker:

such a big deal? Like, he claimed, like, three gates for himself. Like, how'd

Speaker:

that happen? And then when you read the book, it's pretty

Speaker:

obvious, like, he was a big deal. What was also cool about this book, and

Speaker:

it's a shame I can't remember the name, was it also got into the

Speaker:

personality conflicts between, like, these researchers in the early days and stuff like

Speaker:

that. Oh, yeah. So Paulie was quite I don't want to say Paulie was a

Speaker:

smart guy, but not exactly a role model. I'll just leave it there.

Speaker:

A colorful character. Okay. The biggest,

Speaker:

I would say the biggest skill that I've I've figured from our

Speaker:

CEO is she has a skill of put being

Speaker:

really good at putting the patterns together.

Speaker:

Right. That was, that was the biggest thing I noticed, from

Speaker:

when I had to actually work, you know, in the inside. Because usually I work

Speaker:

on the, you know, marketing's I work with our marketing team, which at the

Speaker:

time, we were kinda more so, you know, building out the ideas,

Speaker:

but not really, going full force on the marketing

Speaker:

campaign, you know, really getting the users. So we have about

Speaker:

5,712 users on the app, but

Speaker:

that was with, like, very minimal,

Speaker:

marketing campaigns. And that was just to be able to accumulate some of the data

Speaker:

until we went wide frame. But now that we're building out a lot

Speaker:

of the other algorithms, we're we're pretty confident that we could start

Speaker:

scaling. Interesting.

Speaker:

So given the current state of quantum

Speaker:

Mhmm. The ecosystem where we have, like you said,

Speaker:

you know, JPMorgan just made an announcement, and they seem to kind of

Speaker:

wanna own financial,

Speaker:

financial quantum, systems.

Speaker:

And everyone's make you know, we we talk to a lot of people. So given

Speaker:

the information that's coming out, that's come out, what do you find to be the

Speaker:

most exciting?

Speaker:

Well, that's a great question.

Speaker:

I would say, I saw that with the JP

Speaker:

Morgan, thing, I saw that there was

Speaker:

a teacher there at, UT PhD,

Speaker:

that helped them actually complete that. And for me, because,

Speaker:

you know, one of our engineers did graduate, my sister graduated from

Speaker:

UT, I thought that was pretty big because when we started it,

Speaker:

there was not a lot of, like, resources that we could go to

Speaker:

back then. You know? So now that there's resources that a lot of

Speaker:

people can start going into, that that is, I think, a a big thing.

Speaker:

And then I think that, I saw a lot of the companies, IBM,

Speaker:

I believe D Wave too. There was a few that I saw that a lot

Speaker:

of the hardware companies are starting to work with universities. We

Speaker:

have a a few, very famous, universities

Speaker:

in Korea that I saw a few of them. And, like, that was pretty,

Speaker:

like, touching, like, you know, because, that was

Speaker:

that's a big thing for me, you know, and our our economy there in Korea

Speaker:

too. You know? I I would love to see, you know, quantum start growing

Speaker:

there. You know? It it's just now, you know, touching surface. A lot of

Speaker:

the, you know, government is getting into it. We had

Speaker:

a governor actually recently partner with a few American

Speaker:

companies here to invest in a lot of startups.

Speaker:

I think that that that building out the ecosystem of of

Speaker:

technology in general, I think it's it's a big move, and it's very,

Speaker:

you know, it means a lot. But I think, you know,

Speaker:

just partnering with certain countries even. You know, we

Speaker:

partnered with so many different, European,

Speaker:

companies that helped a lot along the way. So I think that's the

Speaker:

biggest thing for me. I would say, like, I think it's more so

Speaker:

the quantum community is pretty small, so it's pretty somewhat tight.

Speaker:

A lot of companies are open to helping, and I think that's the biggest

Speaker:

thing. JPMorgan, I see that, you know,

Speaker:

they're they're getting there, but I think even before JPMorgan, SoftBank,

Speaker:

chose to start, really putting into that's when I've really

Speaker:

started seeing people pay attention to it. When when SoftBank

Speaker:

first initially started making that investment

Speaker:

into the, the two hardware companies, I saw a big,

Speaker:

like, focus and people actually paying attention. That's how we're gonna

Speaker:

move it, but there's people with names. There's people that are pretty big

Speaker:

that could make a big, difference. But I think it it's also

Speaker:

important for them not to forget about those small

Speaker:

ecosystems that can become big. And that was a big challenge for

Speaker:

us. Even now, it's a huge challenge for us to get and overcome. And

Speaker:

I just think with other startups, we would love to be able to

Speaker:

partner and help once we're able to at that time frame that

Speaker:

we scale to a bigger company.

Speaker:

Yeah. I think that's brilliant. I I I've spoke we've spoken to other guests. We've

Speaker:

talked about how, you know, you know,

Speaker:

there are you know, we Frank had mentioned five or maybe there's seven

Speaker:

different kinds of qubits out there. Like, there's all these different

Speaker:

reasons to to use the quantum algorithms.

Speaker:

What's exciting is that there seems to not

Speaker:

just be one path. Mhmm. And that since

Speaker:

there are multiple paths, I feel personally

Speaker:

that it could be much more in the future, it could be much more of

Speaker:

a collaborative effort. Like you said, getting other like, if you got,

Speaker:

you know, a bunch of, you know, precedes together that they're all

Speaker:

kind of focusing on something that they would benefit from working

Speaker:

with each other, they'd probably get there faster, by

Speaker:

being more collaborative as opposed to saying, you know, I I have to win

Speaker:

the race. So Yeah. I'd like to hear kind of where your mentality is.

Speaker:

I I totally agree with that. What what do you think, Frank? I think that's

Speaker:

a great I mean, I I think it's really the future of the quantum industry.

Speaker:

I think there's the the I think quantum computing is in that weird

Speaker:

kind of embryonic state where it's kinda like

Speaker:

it's it's definitely out of the lab. We'd all agree

Speaker:

that. But I wouldn't call it a major industry yet.

Speaker:

For sure. So it's kind of in that, like, you know,

Speaker:

a lot of the feedback we've gotten when we talk to other

Speaker:

founders and whatnot is saying completely independent people said more or

Speaker:

less the same thing. Like, you go to these quantum conferences. It's always the

Speaker:

same people. They're all PhDs. Right? They're all quantum physicists.

Speaker:

And he's like, that's fine. You need them. But in order for this to

Speaker:

grow into an industry, you know, akin to the

Speaker:

semiconductor industry or whatever industry you wanna use,

Speaker:

right? It you need to get people who are

Speaker:

run the gamut. Right? Run the spectrum of business operations. From

Speaker:

marketing to, you know, operations to, I mean,

Speaker:

heck, even accounting. Right? Like, you know, like and obviously investors and all

Speaker:

that. Like, I mean and and another example that someone had said to me, it's

Speaker:

like, it's a bit like the automotive industry. Right? Like, now we don't question it

Speaker:

as an industry. Right? But at one point, it was just a bunch of geeks,

Speaker:

mechanical kind of Right. Your heads just tinkering in their garage.

Speaker:

Like, one of the one of the funniest anecdotes I've heard, I don't know if

Speaker:

it's true, but it was basically there's a famous book called Think and Grow Rich

Speaker:

by Napoleon Hill. And he was I love it. I love it. That's a great

Speaker:

book. So, like, there was one scene there was one scene where he describes meeting

Speaker:

Henry Ford for the first time. This is before, you know, the blue oval was

Speaker:

a thing. And he's like he was sent there by

Speaker:

Andrew Carnegie to interview this guy because he's he thought he had potential.

Speaker:

And, like, his first thought was this guy in greasy overalls,

Speaker:

like, you know, this guy? Really? Yes. And there

Speaker:

was, like, kind of this moment where you can infer, like, kinda like the internal

Speaker:

dialogue of Napoleon Hill where he's like, really?

Speaker:

Like, you're gonna come infer that, and then you can kind of also infer, like,

Speaker:

he's like, well, Carnegie spoke well of him. He can't just be

Speaker:

like this crazy guy hacking away in a it wasn't even

Speaker:

called the garage then. Right? It would have been like a a carriage house or

Speaker:

whatever. Right. So but, you

Speaker:

know, but but in order for that industry to become what it became, like, you

Speaker:

need everybody. You need people to work the assembly line. You know? Like, so,

Speaker:

like, it takes a I don't wanna use the cliche term it takes a village,

Speaker:

but, I mean, it takes a wide variety of skill sets and personalities to

Speaker:

build out an industry. And It does. I don't I think

Speaker:

that I think in the in in the software slash computer, you know,

Speaker:

big tech industry, I think they figured that out. But I don't

Speaker:

think I think there's a lot of hesitancy

Speaker:

to, like, well, no. I don't want I don't want the the great unwashed masses,

Speaker:

like, you know, doing this. Right? Like, there's a lot of gatekeeping. I think that's

Speaker:

really the word. Data science was the same way. Like, ten years ago, you

Speaker:

know, when I was curious in getting into it, they're like, yeah. You really should

Speaker:

get a PhD. You go back to school, got a PhD. Like like, really? Like,

Speaker:

I can just go, you know, with kids and the dogs and all that. Yeah.

Speaker:

Sure. I can do that. Now to this guy's

Speaker:

to many of their defense, this guy in particular, like, he went to MIT. He

Speaker:

went to Harvard. He has multiple PhDs. Like, to him, getting a getting a

Speaker:

new PhD is like walking down to Walmart and picking up a,

Speaker:

you know, a can of Diet Coke. Right? Like Mhmm. It's it's

Speaker:

not a deal for him. But, like, for for most people, that's a

Speaker:

significant financial and, logistical lift.

Speaker:

Yeah. But do you really need it? Like, I don't I

Speaker:

mean, it depends on what you wanna do. But in order for this to build

Speaker:

out to an industry, requiring everybody in an industry to have some kind of

Speaker:

advanced degree is not sustainable because you can only make

Speaker:

quite so many per year. And you also have people who are very talented who

Speaker:

don't have a degree. Right? So, like, you know, that that that I'm just saying,

Speaker:

like, it becomes, like, this whole thing. And I think we're at that point where

Speaker:

the quantum space is growing now. It's growing at a point where they're gonna have

Speaker:

to let in kids, so to speak, who don't have the PhD card. Mhmm.

Speaker:

Right? And there's always been a bit of that, at least I'm more

Speaker:

experienced with data science. And I think I'm too young to experience how that

Speaker:

went with computer science. But I do have people who mentored

Speaker:

me kind of in the business that basically said it was kind of the same

Speaker:

thing. And, like, it's it's I it's I wouldn't say it's intentional gatekeeping,

Speaker:

but it's kind of gatekeeping. Yeah. None of us. Back to

Speaker:

what you were just saying about Henry Ford when he was first breaking into

Speaker:

the automotive, industry. That's why we

Speaker:

use the candle. Because when the candle was, when they were

Speaker:

building out the candle, there was a lot of people that said it was a

Speaker:

Satan. It was like satanic. Like, at that

Speaker:

time frame, they didn't you know, there's always that moment.

Speaker:

I I'm from Korea. I know because we went through a whole century

Speaker:

while everybody else was progressing of staying stuck in that mentality.

Speaker:

Right. You know? So so I I get I get that. You know? But at

Speaker:

the same time, it takes a lot of different people as you're saying,

Speaker:

and it takes people giving other people chances. You know?

Speaker:

They will be surprised because for me, for an example, when

Speaker:

I when I first entered the field that I'm in, I actually

Speaker:

was working with people that were more tender than me and more,

Speaker:

smarter than me, more qualified. They had they had the

Speaker:

degrees. They had all of that. But the biggest difference was I was still willing

Speaker:

to and able to outsmart them and outwork

Speaker:

them. You you can't just put labels on people and

Speaker:

say, well, that person can't do so much because they're only they're only,

Speaker:

their only certification says that they can do this. That's just not

Speaker:

true. That's where you miss that opportunity of hitting the the golden

Speaker:

goose. Absolutely. Oh, I mean, look at Korea now. Like, the audio manufacturing,

Speaker:

the phones. I mean, Samsung alone is, like, a

Speaker:

major player in multiple markets. And so, like, once you I think you're

Speaker:

right. Like, once you kinda plug in the whole community and, like, everybody can kind

Speaker:

of work towards building something bigger than themselves.

Speaker:

And you and you and you you you you've read the book, Think and Grow

Speaker:

Rich, which I highly recommend. Right? So you know the part where he's kind of

Speaker:

book. It really is a good book. It's very but, like, the whole part where

Speaker:

he meets Henry Ford. And, like, in my lifetime, Henry Ford was, like, this you

Speaker:

know, historical figure. But, like, to meet him, to have somebody talking about him, like

Speaker:

like, really? This is the guy? Are you sure? Yeah. Well, yeah, I can imagine

Speaker:

if they had cell phones back then, he would've, like, went around the back or

Speaker:

texted them and been like, hey. You sure this is the right address?

Speaker:

Yeah. We definitely got that so many times.

Speaker:

Right. Right. No. But I think I think I

Speaker:

think that, this has been a great conversation, and and, I think I

Speaker:

think it's a, I think it speaks

Speaker:

to kind of a a think a line of thinking that Candace Lehan is that,

Speaker:

like, you know, this is a stage now where it's always been it's like an

Speaker:

adolescent phase. Like, it's always kind of this awkward phase where it's it's definitely out

Speaker:

of the lab, but it's definitely not a full on industry yet. Mhmm.

Speaker:

And, I mean, it's awkward. It there's gonna be some strange

Speaker:

moments as you've experienced. But, also, I mean, this is where, you know,

Speaker:

fortunes are made. Right? I mean, when I got into when I

Speaker:

switched from from chemical engineering to computer science, it was a big controversy with my

Speaker:

parents. Right? Because it was not seen as a viable yeah. Can you and I

Speaker:

see that look you gave me. Like, what? Like, this was not seen as a

Speaker:

viable career path up until maybe the mid nineties. Well,

Speaker:

our engineer has the same one, computer science. Yeah.

Speaker:

Yeah. So Yeah. So I mean, but it was not really, like it was

Speaker:

not really seen as a valid career path. Like, you know, my fam my parents

Speaker:

are very old school in that sense where, you know, like, they were doctor, lawyer,

Speaker:

engineer, or, you know, get a military

Speaker:

career. Like, that was basically kinda like their worldview. And, you know, and

Speaker:

I get it. Now that I have the shoes on the other foot, and I'm

Speaker:

a parent now and I have kids, and I'm like, you know, they you know,

Speaker:

I don't know what the the the middle said kid. He said he wanted to

Speaker:

be a race car driver or something like that. And I'm like, no. You gotta

Speaker:

be a doctor or a lawyer. And I'm like, oh, I become my parents.

Speaker:

Yes. Yeah. Well, you know, I went into business,

Speaker:

which for, my mom, that was pretty

Speaker:

hard, you know, because of course it's it's usually the medical

Speaker:

and she was a nurse. So of course it was like the medical. I could

Speaker:

never see myself just going through a field like that. I'm too,

Speaker:

spontaneous, I guess you could say. I like to go with with the

Speaker:

challenges, and and that's why I love this part of it because, like,

Speaker:

quantum is the most challenging, I would say, right now, but just because

Speaker:

I'm in it. I would agree. Yeah. It it's super challenging, you know, but

Speaker:

I think it it's gonna take a a few different approaches.

Speaker:

And I think our approach, when you hit a mainstream, like, when

Speaker:

Tinder became big, when Airbnb became big,

Speaker:

when, Uber began none of these concepts people could

Speaker:

comprehend when it happened. But, you know, I was I was telling somebody,

Speaker:

like, he he asked me, well, why do you need a quantum,

Speaker:

traveling app? You can just book your stuff. But, you

Speaker:

know, Steve Jobs said a long time

Speaker:

ago, sometimes you have to tell people what they need for them to understand

Speaker:

it. And I think when when we start building

Speaker:

out these apps and once we're we're starting to scale it,

Speaker:

people will understand, oh, this is why I needed this

Speaker:

so bad because it makes it so easy. We can we can

Speaker:

tailor it specifically for the person as far as, like,

Speaker:

a travel traveling is a a trillion dollar, projected to be a,

Speaker:

11, $11,000,000,000,000

Speaker:

industry. So when we get into that field, that's when when

Speaker:

when it things will, you know, hit the ground running. But I

Speaker:

know you probably don't wanna talk too much about it, but, I mean, is this,

Speaker:

like, travel from a consumer point of view or logistics

Speaker:

from, like, the airline kind of logistics provider's point of view, or is

Speaker:

it somewhere in the middle or somewhere else entirely? Well, no.

Speaker:

It's it's gonna be for the consumer. So that's why we're building out

Speaker:

that compatibility algorithm in a dating app

Speaker:

because that's what we'll end up utilizing and the optimization

Speaker:

into the traveling app so we can optimize these traveling,

Speaker:

itineraries for people that, like, gives them all like,

Speaker:

we we read something a long time ago where, you know, most

Speaker:

travelers, when they go places, either they regret where they go or they

Speaker:

miss out on the key places that most,

Speaker:

people that are from that area would never have recommended that they

Speaker:

missed. You know? So we're able to kinda build all of those things

Speaker:

in. But I think the biggest thing from my part is just building out

Speaker:

the partnerships with a lot of huge companies, and that's how we're gonna

Speaker:

start kinda building that out. But, yeah, it's just gonna be for consumers, but

Speaker:

it's meant to be, very easy for people to be

Speaker:

able to travel with. Very

Speaker:

cool. I'm looking forward to seeing that because I think it it it there's a

Speaker:

lot of variables in even just on the consumer level of travel. Right? Like, do

Speaker:

you what airports do you like? You know, it's more than just aisle or window.

Speaker:

Right? Oh, you know, I

Speaker:

think of hotels. Like, I I've had to do a lot of business travel of

Speaker:

late and, like, it's kinda like there's just I don't know

Speaker:

how they did it, but post pandemic, they actually made business travel worse. Like

Speaker:

and it's not the big things. It's just the little things. It's like, not this

Speaker:

again. Like, this so I think there's I think there's plenty of room to improve

Speaker:

the process. And then to your point, like, when it comes to online dating, like,

Speaker:

now that's, like, totally normal to meet people. Like, I met my wife,

Speaker:

online, and that was kind of, like, you know, like, really?

Speaker:

Like, you know, when I was like, done. The day. Yeah. And it

Speaker:

wasn't that long ago. Like, it was only, like, 02/2006. But, like, even before

Speaker:

then, you knew I knew people that had met through Usenet, if you even know

Speaker:

what that is. Wow. It's it's so before the web, there

Speaker:

was, basically news groups, on the Internet. So, like,

Speaker:

you know so there was, like, alt.personalsdot, like, whatever.

Speaker:

And, people met there, and it was, like, you know, some people we

Speaker:

know have been married, like, thirty, forty years. Like, that's where they met.

Speaker:

And but, like, you know, prior to when my wife and I met on

Speaker:

match.com. By that point, it was almost mainstream. But, like,

Speaker:

prior to that, it was just like, oh, no. You met online.

Speaker:

She's probably a match murderer. Someone's currently the people we

Speaker:

talk to. And even even some of the big companies that we

Speaker:

were pitching partnerships with, like, a lot of them actually all met on

Speaker:

dating app. Them and their wives met on on dating apps or,

Speaker:

Match. Match is a a huge one. And, you know, so I I do

Speaker:

think that, like, if somebody has, like, a resignation with

Speaker:

it, me, I just had headaches that my best friend was trying to solve, and

Speaker:

that's why some of these ideas came. That well, that's the

Speaker:

best reason, you know, solutions to real problems that you're having. I

Speaker:

mean, a %. That's why that's why most of the jobs

Speaker:

that we have now didn't even exist when we were in university.

Speaker:

You know, the world changes very quickly. I mean, I would never thought I

Speaker:

would be doing this when I was at Columbia and

Speaker:

getting my liberal arts education. You know, you never know

Speaker:

where it's gonna end up and and where the passion and when you're gonna meet

Speaker:

somebody who's gonna inspire you so much that they're

Speaker:

gonna help in changing your trajectory. So Technology

Speaker:

changes so fast in society along with it. Like, when we were talking about our

Speaker:

first computers the other day, right, and you

Speaker:

when you went off to college when I went off to college, the mat there

Speaker:

were no ColorMax. Right? Like, there were no, like, colorful back and

Speaker:

then when you were talking about, like, how when you went to school, like, all

Speaker:

the other cool kids had The color max, the orange or

Speaker:

yeah. They all had these Tangerine and all those colors. And I'm like, well, I

Speaker:

was out of college by time that happened. And we're not like that different in

Speaker:

age. Like, it was not like it's not like a generational thing. But, like, it's,

Speaker:

it's just fascinating. Because when I got the collars, like, a color Mac was, like,

Speaker:

the giant, like, thing you would get. And it was basically, you had to sell

Speaker:

a kidney to get one. Oh, yeah.

Speaker:

But, you know, a couple years later, you know, the the little iMacs came out

Speaker:

and stuff like that. And I and I think that there's the

Speaker:

unintended consequences for society. Like, you know, I met my wife. I don't think I

Speaker:

would have met her ordinarily because I was in a different city and stuff

Speaker:

like that. And we almost met just by chance based on,

Speaker:

like, shared connections and stuff like that in the nineties in New York because

Speaker:

she worked at a I, an early day ISP. And I was

Speaker:

trying to start set up another downstream ISP, like a consumer

Speaker:

brand. And I remember talking I was talking to one of the sales

Speaker:

reps who was at that company, and she would've if if we

Speaker:

had raised the funding, she would've shown up to that meeting, which is kinda funny.

Speaker:

That is very funny. Yeah. But but, I mean, they say your

Speaker:

soulmate, you know Yeah. Exactly. To to find you. But that's why

Speaker:

I think the coolest thing is we are literally using

Speaker:

parallel universes to make matches. Like, who can

Speaker:

say that? Right. Right. Great. That's

Speaker:

very romantic. And, and, and, oh, that's

Speaker:

just so exciting. Come on. Find your soulmate across the

Speaker:

multiverse. That should be your turn. Right.

Speaker:

Exactly. Exactly. Awesome. So we're, I'm sorry, Candace.

Speaker:

Go ahead. Okay. So I, I want to say to Anna that I want the

Speaker:

opportunity, to have you back on the show

Speaker:

again. I love what you're talking about. We'd

Speaker:

love to follow what is going on with Hedo Match

Speaker:

and, your work now, and then your work

Speaker:

into your next project, the travel. I wanna be part of it. I wanna hear

Speaker:

all about it. So hopefully you would like to come back

Speaker:

again. Of course. Oh, fabulous. That's exactly what I'm looking

Speaker:

for. So good. Good. This was so fascinating.

Speaker:

And, honestly, I have a bunch of people that, like, wanna talk to you,

Speaker:

that I've that I've spoken to, and then I'm like, she's got something real going

Speaker:

on right now. So, you know, business owner, bid you know,

Speaker:

president to presidents of these exciting quantum companies.

Speaker:

Again, the collaboration is really where the the most

Speaker:

fantastic stuff can happen. So I think that's great. I think that's

Speaker:

great. Thank you so much. Thanks for joining, and we'll let our

Speaker:

AI, who, far as I know, she's not Quantum, Bailey

Speaker:

finish the show. And that wraps up another entangled

Speaker:

episode of Impact Quantum. Huge thanks to Anna White

Speaker:

for showing us how quantum isn't just about Schrodinger's cat and

Speaker:

abstract physics. It's also about solving real world problems, like

Speaker:

love, travel, and the occasional cryptographic

Speaker:

crisis. If you enjoyed this mind bending conversation,

Speaker:

be sure to like, subscribe, and tell your AI

Speaker:

assistant to do the same. Until next time, stay

Speaker:

curious, stay quantum. And remember, in the

Speaker:

multiverse of possibilities, you're only one qubit away from

Speaker:

greatness.