Speaker:

There is so much out there to get mad about. Social injustices, class warfare, continued

Speaker:

colonization, the act of destruction of our planet by those focused on prophets and not

Speaker:

people. We can find it overwhelming at times. The good news is there are equally as many,

Speaker:

if not more, stories of people coming together and rising up against the forces at play. So

Speaker:

the creators of Blueprints of Disruption have added a new weekly segment, Rival Rants, where

Speaker:

we will unpack the stories that have us most riled up, share calls to action, and most importantly,

Speaker:

celebrate resistance. Today we're ranting about cops. I mean, that's the simplest way to put

Speaker:

it. I've got it. It feels like too many stories here sitting in front of me that are just from

Speaker:

the last week or two across Canada. police forces, municipal police forces for the most part,

Speaker:

absolutely just cracking down on protests, aiding in encampment evictions, arresting journalists,

Speaker:

just really pissing us off. And it's tied in with so many of the other things that we have

Speaker:

been talking about, whether it's the demonization of the pro-Palestinian movement or disruption

Speaker:

in general. the overfunding of police forces and the general rise of fascism here in Canada.

Speaker:

And yeah, we're going to run through some of the examples to keep you guys up to date, but

Speaker:

it just opens up a whole bunch of discussion points that really has my blood boiling this

Speaker:

week. Let's get into it. Edmonton. I mean, this is what really kind of sparked. the need for

Speaker:

Santiago and I to talk about this because we're talking about encampment evictions quite a

Speaker:

bit on the show and the use of security forces or police. But here in Edmonton, I mean, they

Speaker:

were ruthless. They announced that they were going to clear eight different encampments,

Speaker:

over a hundred people. And, you know, they tried to fight it through the courts. In the end,

Speaker:

the cops and minus 20 weather. Minus 30 now. Minus 40 at nighttime two days after they had

Speaker:

finished the very last encampment. With wind chill feels like minus 50 now even. Just to

Speaker:

make you more mad while this was happening their mayor was on vacation in Hawaii. That opens

Speaker:

another kind of discussion point where politicians just play games with people's lives. So he's

Speaker:

in Hawaii, his police force is evicting people, they're arresting journalists on site. We'll

Speaker:

get into that in a second. And they're going to have a council meeting to declare homelessness

Speaker:

an emergency in responses, though, like they didn't play part and parcel of this decantment.

Speaker:

Just going to bat back and forth with the province like it's somebody else's problem. And so,

Speaker:

I mean, apparently Edmonton says they have the facilities. They're not quite at. full capacity,

Speaker:

only 94% shelter capacity. So they say they can take everyone, but we've talked many times

Speaker:

on the show before that shelters aren't for everybody. They're not designed for everybody.

Speaker:

And so the reality is folks are gonna be out. But the point is the cops really, they arrested

Speaker:

Brandi Morton. For folks who don't know, you know, maybe get to know Brandi Morton, she

Speaker:

is an Edward Murrow award winner. You might've read her covering the Fairy Creek blockade.

Speaker:

And even though she has done a multitude of pieces on protests and different situations

Speaker:

like that, land offending, this is the first time in 13 years that she had ever been arrested.

Speaker:

And from the accounts that I'm reading online where she has her firsthand accounts, I mean,

Speaker:

she was shook. This was not something, even though she had witnessed, I'm sure, bullying

Speaker:

and horrible police tactics as a journalist. she had never been treated that way. Reading

Speaker:

her account and a few other people, I think that really points to the lack of respect journalists

Speaker:

are getting from police or the distinction that they have, or in general, just the ability

Speaker:

for people to challenge the status quo. And police are now, your tax dollars, your city

Speaker:

budgets are going to, into funding this. And I think that was quite an alarming moment.

Speaker:

Yeah, I mean, the whole thing. I mean, the fact that there's even Encampment evictions happening

Speaker:

in this kind of weather conditions is already alarming but the crackdown on media trying

Speaker:

to cover it is Just it's exactly what we were talking about in the recent episode on fascism,

Speaker:

right? Showing that police are getting more and more comfortable with more and more authoritarian

Speaker:

tactics This was someone who was there simply to cover not participating like they and they

Speaker:

were not just moved out of the scene. They were taken in, they had their fingerprints taken,

Speaker:

you know, they were properly arrested. As you mentioned, they're not new to this, like they've

Speaker:

been around the block a few times. The Ferry Creek, we know what a disaster everything around

Speaker:

Ferry Creek was. This is unprecedented and we're seeing it happen more and more. It's a trend.

Speaker:

It's no longer enough

Speaker:

an episode without mentioning it, of course, was happening in Gaza. Canada's complicitness

Speaker:

there with regards to the murder of journalists and now the treatment of journalists back at

Speaker:

home, it's not a disconnected thing. It's part of the same system. It's the same culture,

Speaker:

the same philosophy, just in different forms here than there. It's not just the Edmonton

Speaker:

police. We know the Toronto police have done this as well. And just as I'm preparing my

Speaker:

notes to do this episode, we see in Vancouver at Oppenheimer Park, activists were arrested

Speaker:

by Vancouver police when they were trying to protect the property of those being evicted.

Speaker:

They call it a decantment. So we have another term to describe what we're seeing. And it's

Speaker:

kind of scary that there's... I hate that. Lingo all built around the expulsion of people from

Speaker:

tents in the winter. So it's not just journalists being arrested. It's also people that are trying

Speaker:

to be good Samaritans, essentially. So Brandi, although she was offered the ability to move

Speaker:

from the area, at the time the police had hands on with a community member, an indigenous community

Speaker:

member of the encampment. And she felt like it was her duty to witness that as a journalist

Speaker:

and to not be... put away, put aside. We're giving a lot of power to police to decide when,

Speaker:

how, and where we can protest. This episode is going to be full of those examples. But

Speaker:

I want to go back to something you said there, Santiago. You talked about the police getting

Speaker:

more bold. And I think we have a responsibility there. So it's one thing to have a defund the

Speaker:

police movement. But also earlier this week, there's a video that went semi-viral of a d***.

Speaker:

I didn't know what term to use when I wrote this because I didn't want to insult you in

Speaker:

your view of journalism, but also rebel news is what we're talking about. So a rebel news

Speaker:

reporter walked up to Deputy Prime Minister Krista Freeland, one of my favorite politicians

Speaker:

to hate, and he ended up getting shouldered by this cop. You know, presumably he's part

Speaker:

of her security detail. Even if you didn't know who he was, he had a microphone. He was clearly

Speaker:

asking a question. I could kind of see his creds around his neck. There's no way here security

Speaker:

detail hadn't encountered him before. They knew exactly who he was and they didn't care. And

Speaker:

they didn't even care. They were on camera like he almost looks square in the camera and says,

Speaker:

I'm charging you with assault when, you know, he plants himself in the way of that reporter.

Speaker:

So unless you put on the brakes real fast, you're. you're gonna end up bumping into him. And then

Speaker:

with a straight face, tells him he's charging him with assault for that. So it wasn't just,

Speaker:

you know, ignoring police. It was a really dirty tactic of, you know, suckering him into an

Speaker:

assault charge. We shouldn't be surprised, right? Like anybody listening, we just talked about

Speaker:

how Brandi was arrested. And I mean, we've told many, many stories of police brutality are

Speaker:

out there, but what really pissed me off around this, other than I was already pissed off about

Speaker:

the video, was the response to... From leftists, from people with defund the police in their

Speaker:

friggin bios. I took so much heat for kind of condemning the police for doing that. I thought

Speaker:

this is why police are bold. Not just why, there's a million reasons why, but surely we contribute

Speaker:

it when we condone it when it happens to our political opponents. Yeah, that really bothered

Speaker:

me personally, the response. And this is a situation where it, this, this does affect me as an individual

Speaker:

personally because tolerating the actions of the police in this situation, it opens the

Speaker:

door for the same thing to happen to me when I'm out in the field doing my work because

Speaker:

as much as we view him, rightfully so, as a propagandist and question his legitimacy in

Speaker:

terms of their journalistic output, which has no credibility in terms of any sort of fact.

Speaker:

based reporting any sort of anything at all. Like it's rebel news, you know, we know what

Speaker:

rebel news is. It doesn't change the fact that when they're out in the field with a microphone

Speaker:

and a camera, they're journalists. There's no accreditation system in these situations. Anybody

Speaker:

who goes with a microphone and a camera and is looking to report on a situation is a journalist.

Speaker:

What he is a very, very bad journalist, a propagandist. but a journalist nonetheless. And that's an

Speaker:

important distinction to make because they're gonna say the same things about people like

Speaker:

me, you know? And so it puts me in the, we were just talking about the episode with Dimitri,

Speaker:

you know, we were just talking about going in and asking Christia Freeland questions. It

Speaker:

could have, like it literally could have been me in that situation. And it's not right. no

Speaker:

matter what, no matter how piss poor of a journalist they are, it's not right to arrest people for

Speaker:

this. It's not. We can criticize them in whatever way we want, but the use of police here is

Speaker:

authoritarianism, which we stand against. Now, I know, for example, that he was funneling

Speaker:

about concerns, but he didn't touch Garcia Freeland. They didn't ask him to move. They immediately

Speaker:

went to arrest him and charged him with assault. What happened was completely unacceptable.

Speaker:

And the response from fellow leftists, it's the same thing that happened during, you know,

Speaker:

the freedom convoy, so-called, or whenever, you know, the right ends up running with police,

Speaker:

which is far less often, but it does happen. And we see people cheer them on because they're

Speaker:

not on our side. And what happens is, I mean, just like with the freedom convoy, we're seeing

Speaker:

what's happening now at Avenue Road where protests are perfectly acceptable, protests are being

Speaker:

criminalized. That is the result. There's no exceptions to be made here. When we say all

Speaker:

cops are bastards, it's all cops are bastards. Fuck the police every single time. Why do people

Speaker:

forget that consistently? Consistently, like something goes wrong and they want a police

Speaker:

response in their favor. I think this is mostly white folks that do that. I'm gonna go out

Speaker:

on a limb and say that because they just are so used to using police to solve their problems.

Speaker:

Inherently, they know systemically, they know that it's an issue, but on a one-on-one basis,

Speaker:

if it's helping them out, they're okay with it. And I'm not okay with that at all. And

Speaker:

it's not just about looking hypocritical, what you do, you just hand fodder over to the right

Speaker:

wing. You also give them permission to mock our journalists, folks like Brandy or heaven

Speaker:

forbid Santiago getting pulled in for the work that he does. You open the door for that. You

Speaker:

normalize these police responses. And just like Santiago said, just like the convoy and the

Speaker:

use of the Emergency Act. simply because it was shutting down something that, you know,

Speaker:

was very disruptive to a community. I understand that. But in the end, a lot of the things that

Speaker:

we are going to do, like protesting out Melanie Jolie's house, is going to be disruptive to

Speaker:

neighborhoods, maybe even neighborhoods that have Jewish people living in them. And we start

Speaker:

just kind of opening these doors to say you can protest here but not here. You can protest

Speaker:

like this. but not like that over and over and over again. And comments like, oh, that's just

Speaker:

fashion, fashion violence is also completely incorrect. Rebel News surely contributes to

Speaker:

the downfall of society. Okay, like there is no defending that trash. Absolutely. But if

Speaker:

there is one way to build cross partisan, working class solidarity, surely it's with our experiences

Speaker:

with police, poor folks. working class folks for the most part are going to buck up against

Speaker:

police as it gets worse. We have different ways that we're going to go about it. Maybe we have

Speaker:

different solutions, different reasons we'll take to the streets, but you've seen it. And

Speaker:

we can't just keep opening the door for arrests, you know, requiring permits. And, you know,

Speaker:

in the case that we're going to next annexing complete neighborhoods and making them. zones

Speaker:

of exclusion for protests that then have like added layers of criminality built into them

Speaker:

just arbitrarily decided by police. Yeah, I have to say like from pulling from my own personal

Speaker:

experience here that sometimes I have been surprised in the past at people who I wouldn't consider

Speaker:

on my side having a usefulness in a way you could say. I remember the time when I was at

Speaker:

For John Tory's budget, you know, they kicked out the media so that they could arrest people

Speaker:

who were there protesting people who? I'm not gonna say their names, but we would know them

Speaker:

if I did There was two people from media who stayed behind there was me and there was a

Speaker:

reporter or a cameraman from the Toronto Sun and The Toronto Sun is another organization

Speaker:

that I would not consider to be of the benefit of society that I would not you know, I'm not

Speaker:

allied with at all. I have heavy criticisms on the Sun, but the cameraman stayed behind,

Speaker:

recorded, published the videos so that people could see what was going on. And he protected

Speaker:

me during that time as well. And as well as, you know, one of the, my professor for newspaper

Speaker:

class, who was a Toronto Sun reporter for decades, I would assume that he would be somebody who...

Speaker:

would not be on my side, yet he made me editor-in-chief of the paper and every single edition, the

Speaker:

front cover had a protest on it. And we covered more protests than any other paper in the city.

Speaker:

So journalism is important. You know, like the whole New York Times democracy dies in the

Speaker:

darkness. You know, whether or not we consider it good journalism or bad journalism, journalism

Speaker:

is important and needs protection. And when we start trying to draw these distinctions

Speaker:

too aggressively... it puts us in danger. I really believe that. I'm not saying that rebel

Speaker:

news is a good thing. But when somebody calls themselves a journalist, I don't care who it

Speaker:

is, there is protections that are needed there. And I think it balances out for the better.

Speaker:

Because if somebody publishes video and does propaganda all over, if this clown goes in

Speaker:

and tries to spread his propaganda asking for see a freelance, well, questions, well then

Speaker:

we can respond to it. We can see and we can comment on what they're saying and it's a good

Speaker:

thing to know what the right is saying because if we let these narratives grow without being

Speaker:

able to respond to them, that's how fascism rises. You know, we need to be able to know

Speaker:

what's going on from every side and be able to argue against it. So yeah, I'm pissed about

Speaker:

this. Every right to be because let's be fairer. You know, you might take a little bit of flack

Speaker:

for saying, you know, anyone who says they're a journalist is a journalist, because, you

Speaker:

know, that opens up the imagination. But to Santiago's point, who then decides who who's

Speaker:

doing that accreditation? Because because Santiago won't get accreditation. Some of the greatest

Speaker:

reporters that ever were probably wouldn't be selected for accreditation. because they would

Speaker:

be known to be asking hard hitting questions, writing with a slant, a bias that is damaging

Speaker:

to, you know, there's vendettas that go on that would just like allow such manipulation of

Speaker:

process. And so it's got to stay separate. Before we move on from the story of journalists getting

Speaker:

arrested, I want to repeat two points that Desmond Cole made. I felt incredibly validated when

Speaker:

I saw him chime in on this because I felt like I felt a little bit out of tune where people

Speaker:

were not feeling what I was saying. And he set the record straight here, as he usually does.

Speaker:

Yes, journalists need access to certain things for certain reasons. But everyday people also

Speaker:

need to be able to ask questions and interact with the people who govern them. Because to

Speaker:

his next point, had this same kind of mentality, oh, we got too close. walked her into a corner,

Speaker:

you know. We saw footage not that long ago of Prime Minister Trudeau being accosted at a

Speaker:

restaurant by people we know. And on that same mentality, we would have had them arrested

Speaker:

as well, right? It's not hypotheticals. There are examples right now of these same tactics

Speaker:

being utilized against our side, and we've given space to it. I kind of hinted about a neighbourhood

Speaker:

being cut off from protests. Last week Toronto police decided that Avenue Road in the 401,

Speaker:

there's an overpass there as there are every time you get a highway I guess, and that area

Speaker:

has been shut off from protests. Now, you know we're specifically talking about pro-Palestinian

Speaker:

protests because they've allowed protests and banner drops on this overpass many, many times

Speaker:

before. It's a very visible spot. Banner drops are a common activity in protests. In fact,

Speaker:

the first initial event that set the police off was like a province-wide, at least a city-wide

Speaker:

banner drop. So there were multiple locations on that day. It was a call to action for the

Speaker:

Palestinian youth movement to show solidarity and whatnot. And so there was all kinds organized

Speaker:

and these kind of overpasses there. These events are announced ahead of time and counter protests

Speaker:

show up, some of them end up getting kind of heated. But, you know, for me, in order to

Speaker:

really explain like how this happened, you have to go back to like the city of Toronto, right

Speaker:

October 7th, 8th, Olivia Chow releases a statement, her first statement, you know, has the required

Speaker:

condemnation of what happened, the violence, but then immediately goes into police mode,

Speaker:

saying she sat down with Toronto police, that she's going to encourage them to start protecting

Speaker:

the Jewish community. And we talked about this, like on its face, it doesn't seem like a bad

Speaker:

thing, police protecting a community. But hopefully you've heard enough episodes to understand

Speaker:

like how problematic that is. I can't unpack that all here. But, you know, it demonized

Speaker:

right away Palestinians. It assumed that there was some sort of threat here in Canada, presumably

Speaker:

from Palestinians to the Jewish community. And this narrative has permeated through all of

Speaker:

the protests and how they've been portrayed. how they've been portrayed since. And right

Speaker:

away, we saw police accosting people for flying Palestinian flags, and now it's gone next level.

Speaker:

Like they are walking down the street in their own neighborhood with kafias and police arrested

Speaker:

them because they have decided that was a protest and this is within the designated area. And

Speaker:

they're doing this because they say it's a predominantly Jewish community. Now you live in the city,

Speaker:

Toronto, Santiago. There is no exclusive community hardly anywhere in the city of Toronto. And

Speaker:

that's not even the most predominantly known Jewish community in the city. It's this area

Speaker:

in particular, it can't be claimed by any one group in particular. It's incredibly diverse

Speaker:

like most areas are. It'd be one thing, you know, we're talking about protests outside

Speaker:

of synagogues. There are areas along Bathurst that are definitely areas that I would say

Speaker:

are known to be, this is a Jewish community. This area on Avenue is not, and you cannot

Speaker:

claim an overpass as part of any community. An overpass is an overpass. It's very clear

Speaker:

why they picked this area because of the visibility. You know, and just like this area belongs to

Speaker:

many people, the people who are protesting there, who we spoke to the other day, They live there.

Speaker:

This is their community. This is nothing more than a very thinly veiled opportunistic excuse

Speaker:

to be able to shut down what has been an effective and visible protest. And they're looking to

Speaker:

do this more and more. They're looking to find excuses. Now, we know right now, based on recent

Speaker:

polling data, that the vast majority of people in Toronto are actually in support of the protests.

Speaker:

That is not the narrative that they're trying to paint here. We, that didn't happen overnight.

Speaker:

It didn't start that way. Much, many less people were in support at this beginning, but it's

Speaker:

a testament to how effective these protests, which have now been going on every single weekend

Speaker:

and more since the past 100 days. There was something like what, 300 protests in Toronto

Speaker:

or something? There was a ridiculous number like that. I think there's weekly ones every

Speaker:

Saturday or Sunday on the weekend there. And then you've got some outside of the Israeli

Speaker:

consulate. And yet I can imagine that number is quite high, especially if you include all

Speaker:

of these local protests that are coming up, which was part of the strategy of enabling

Speaker:

and empowering locals to start their own smaller organizations so that they could. represent

Speaker:

locally, increase visibility, and these folks are answering that call and doing a banner

Speaker:

drop along. And people are saying they're targeting the neighborhood because it's Jewish when it's

Speaker:

their own neighborhood. And talk about being targeted. I don't want to tell their whole

Speaker:

story because they're going to come on here, but these folks were treated horribly, you

Speaker:

know, not just by the police, but by folks driving by, the things that were said. This was 100%

Speaker:

green lit. by Olivia Chow and quite a few Toronto city councillors that made it clear these protests

Speaker:

needed extra police scrutiny, right? Her one of her first statements is, I understand there's

Speaker:

a protest without a permit going on, like you don't need a permit, and deciding arbitrarily,

Speaker:

like who gave the police power to just decide and where are the boundaries? And is every

Speaker:

kind of protest or is this just pro-Palestinian protests? The permit comment is really annoying

Speaker:

and it's not the first time recently that she has said that about the permit. Olivia Chow

Speaker:

has been to her fair share of protests throughout the years. She knows better. She comes from

Speaker:

that area, like from, you know, a history of, of protests. It is so malicious for her to

Speaker:

imply that. And I'm seeing this narrative repeated online by people. I don't know. if who still

Speaker:

needs to hear this, but no, you do not need a permit to protest. There's not certain places

Speaker:

you can protest and certain places you cannot protest wherever the fuck you want. And in

Speaker:

terms of blocking roads, like a protest is not meant to be as accommodating as possible to

Speaker:

those in power and to the, to, you know, business as usual status quo, you know, if a protest

Speaker:

blocks a road, good. If it inconveniences people, good, because we've seen the 300 protests around

Speaker:

the city. A protest that is as accommodating as possible, it's not going to get noticed.

Speaker:

It's not going to get the message across. And when people, I mean, right now, Israel's in

Speaker:

the, uh, in the ICJ right now, facing genocide charges. We don't need to explain to anybody

Speaker:

what the hell is going on here. When children are dying at this level, when Hospitals are

Speaker:

being bombed schools are being bombed journalists are being killed doctors are being killed and

Speaker:

little inconvenience seems Pretty fucking minor and they're not blocking the road. That's the

Speaker:

other thing They're actually not the police are Brock blocking the road so that they can

Speaker:

arrest people The police are blocking the road so they have an excuse to use What what's it

Speaker:

called the highway act so they can criminalize this? they're not even blocking the road, but

Speaker:

Again, like these, it's the same thing we were just talking about when we were talking about

Speaker:

the reaction of people to the rebel news story, the Freeman convoy, all these things. It's,

Speaker:

it doesn't matter. It is, we cannot start drawing these lines. We cannot start trying to de-radicalize

Speaker:

these things and to be accommodating. We're, by doing so, we surrender the ability to be

Speaker:

effective. The next example that I'm going to give shows that. That's the response that they're

Speaker:

getting in Ottawa to the bylaw tickets. And although our next story actually will be another

Speaker:

example against pro-Palestinian protests, I think it's prudent to say, though, that police

Speaker:

don't give a fuck. We know why Olivia said what she said, and we know why Zionists are framing

Speaker:

Palestinian movements the way that they are. But in the end, the police don't give a fuck.

Speaker:

They don't care what your cause is. They're not out there because they're Zionists. I mean,

Speaker:

they might be, but that's not the point. The point is they love the chance to stomp on your

Speaker:

charter rights and expand their power and expand their budget. They don't care if you're from

Speaker:

rebel news or whether you're an independent indigenous reporter. They don't care if you're

Speaker:

protesting vaccines or if you're fighting a genocide. They will get more money for doing

Speaker:

what they do. They will look like the saviors of the day. They will flex their muscles and

Speaker:

push boundaries unless we push back, right? And that's thankfully, although expensive,

Speaker:

that's what folks are doing in response to the $490 tickets. Like... I'm so broke. That would

Speaker:

bust me. $490 tickets are being handed out to activists in Ottawa when they use voice amplification,

Speaker:

noise amplification. The average Canadian, and this is a statistic from like four years ago,

Speaker:

so it's got to be worse, the average Canadian cannot afford a $400 emergency. This affects

Speaker:

the vast majority of people. Because sometimes it's not going to be violence, maybe it's not

Speaker:

going to be arrests, but they will find all sorts of deterrents to use through the security

Speaker:

mechanisms that they have to stop us from taking to the streets, to confine even smaller the

Speaker:

boundaries of which is acceptable to protest. The folks in Ottawa, what we're talking about

Speaker:

is, you know, they're using a bullhorn. Has anybody ever been to a protest where there

Speaker:

hasn't been a megaphone, a bullhorn, or a speaker system used to amplify, you know, your speakers

Speaker:

perhaps at the rally or the chants as you march along? I've never, I mean, for Christmas, when

Speaker:

you're, I got one that can sit on your belt and clip around your collar. I mean, this is

Speaker:

standard operating procedure for even the smallest of rallies. And now they're handing out $490

Speaker:

tickets. So folks from the Palestinian youth movement obviously ended up with some. I saw

Speaker:

representatives of PSAC out there, that is a public sector union, and other community members.

Speaker:

So they issued nine of these tickets one week and three on another in late December. And

Speaker:

the response from the Palestinian youth movement representative that was quoted there is like,

Speaker:

we're gonna keep doing this. We are gonna fight them in court. So they've retained counsel

Speaker:

to push this through the courts. They were gonna raise money to pay the fines, I suppose, in

Speaker:

the meantime, and they're gonna keep using sound amplification. And like I said, it's almost

Speaker:

unimaginable to try to do that without. I know the Occupy movement, we started the People's

Speaker:

Might. I don't know if that was because the police had threatened or it just became a lack

Speaker:

of resources overcome, but you know, you can't do it without. A megaphone, I mean, it becomes

Speaker:

an accessibility thing. And more to the point of what we were talking about is not backing

Speaker:

down. Like a lot of the response to the Avenue Road 401 is like the moderate approach. Well,

Speaker:

you know, just the benefit of the doubt. Some people feel unsafe, so just go somewhere else.

Speaker:

And it's like, but fucking people can say that anywhere and everywhere. And at what point

Speaker:

do you draw the line and you take a stand and say, absolutely not? The only recourse I can

Speaker:

have can't be through the courts. Not everyone can get a lawyer and fight things through the

Speaker:

courts. And even if you can, it's already served to deter other people. I think like a showing

Speaker:

of force, I saw people suggest, you know, the response to the Avenue Road situation would

Speaker:

actually be to move the weekly protests there. And I know some people might cringe at that,

Speaker:

but you have to be the boss in this situation. You can't allow the police, you can't allow

Speaker:

the city. to push back anymore than they already have. Our rights have already been curtailed

Speaker:

so much. There's already the threat of police intervention all the time. To start normalizing

Speaker:

increasingly oppressive tactics by them is a huge mistake, a huge mistake. So, you know,

Speaker:

whether it's bylaw officers or cops, the city's response, I guess... Perhaps this was initiated

Speaker:

in response to the stupid fucking convoy that drove the neighbors crazy with all of the noise

Speaker:

that they made. And so it's a perfect example of us likely advocating for certain responses

Speaker:

that are coming back to bite us in the end. But the city's response is trying to like,

Speaker:

oh, well, we want to educate you on the rules of protests. so similar to the areas of exclusion,

Speaker:

just work within these very reasonable bounds. But that defeats the entire purpose of protests.

Speaker:

Because let me tell you, whatever is defined for you is what is tolerable to them. And the

Speaker:

whole point of a demonstration, of a disruption, is to come to a point that is intolerable and

Speaker:

forces a negotiation, a capitulation, a victory. If you always work within the confines of what

Speaker:

has been deemed already acceptable, you've already lost and wasted your energy, frankly. I just

Speaker:

can't help but think of the French right now. Oh, you mean like their protests? Yeah. Can

Speaker:

you imagine telling the French, oh, you can't use microphones, you can't protest in this

Speaker:

neighborhood? Like... That they would. It's like when they told Celtic fans not to bring

Speaker:

Palestinian flags to the next match. And I think I don't know where they found so many flags,

Speaker:

but it seems like every fan there had a flag in response. You have to outdo them. It can't.

Speaker:

I'm so tired of finding the middle ground with fascists. We don't even have to look all the

Speaker:

way to Celtics. I mean, here in the MLS. It's just Celtic. Yeah, Celtic. Sorry. There was

Speaker:

a similar ban for Portland Timber fans. They like to fly a lot of anti-fascist flags during

Speaker:

their games. It led to the league outlawing political banners and then they doubled down

Speaker:

on it and then they had to make an exception for them because they refused to back down

Speaker:

on it, right? And now I still see anti-fascist flags every time TFC plays against Portland

Speaker:

Timbers and I can't help but, you know. You're on the wrong side. Yeah, cheer for them. You

Speaker:

need to bring the Red Patch boys around. No, Portland has always. Yeah, I have a soft spot

Speaker:

for Portland. Fun fact, apparently Portland and me share music taste, according to my Spotify

Speaker:

rap for twenty three city most similar to my music taste. Anyways, shout out to Portland.

Speaker:

But you know that it's a good example, right? Like it. There's been plenty of times when

Speaker:

there's been an attempt, you know, like the French have tried to outlaw protests altogether

Speaker:

and the French, they doubled down, you know? We see how strong their movements are, right?

Speaker:

Look at Lebanon. I mean, in Colombia, they had the, they were, just a couple years ago, the

Speaker:

protests got massive and they tried to outlaw them and people got hurt. People kept going

Speaker:

and then you know the first leftist was elected now. I'm not gonna talk too much about that

Speaker:

But you know like it's very tame. What's going on here? These are these are real low-key protests

Speaker:

that Well, they don't they're we're not exactly pelting cops with rocks yet like the French

Speaker:

You know, there's no Molotov cocktails You know, yes, it's pretty low-key what's going on over

Speaker:

here They cannot possibly have an issue with this. And we don't back down an inch. Like

Speaker:

these are some of the most, yeah, sorry. They're just way too chill. But to be fair, our cops

Speaker:

are snowflakes too, right? They haven't experienced what you're talking about, but you bring up

Speaker:

South America, and don't worry, I won't make you go deep. But it does remind me that Argentina,

Speaker:

the wonderful new fascist leader over there, one of the tactics that... we're starting to

Speaker:

bill the social movements for the police response to their protests. So if they need to call

Speaker:

out the tanks and every cop in the city, then the leaders of the various organizations that

Speaker:

put together that rally, you put your logo on the flyer and I guess you're getting a bill

Speaker:

in the mail that I imagine is a lot heftier than... a $490 fine. We have an interview with

Speaker:

Anna Lippman coming up where you hear her talk about taking risks, risking arrest and the

Speaker:

balance of working within the confines available, but also pushing boundaries in order to get

Speaker:

what you need done. But absolutely the response is to push back and to obviously start defunding

Speaker:

these police forces. Because as you remember at the top of the show, we weren't just talking

Speaker:

about pro-Palestinian protests. Like I said, the cops don't, they don't care. They are flexing

Speaker:

their muscles from coast to coast. And in Toronto, we know the budget talks are coming up. We'll

Speaker:

tear that apart when it comes due, but we know the cops are likely to get more money, and

Speaker:

then they're not even happy they want even more money. And the whole point of doing this and

Speaker:

flexing and pulling out all the stops... is to excuse their budgets and justify more. They

Speaker:

are the solution to everything now, right? Housing and disruption and traffic and always crime

Speaker:

and drugs, right? So obviously all your funds should go there. They're gonna fix it all.

Speaker:

Yeah, that's the relationship of police versus movements, right? No matter which movement

Speaker:

you are, no matter what issue it is. The police are there as a tool of the state to repress

Speaker:

those movements. It's... That's the history. That's modern history right there, right? That's

Speaker:

the second you are being effective at something, you can expect to have a run in with the police.

Speaker:

You know? I've seen it through a variety of different issues. Desmond Cole has seen it

Speaker:

a million times himself. You know, we mentioned him earlier. I bring up Desmond Cole because

Speaker:

he was just tweeting about... There was a recent report that came out just a couple days ago

Speaker:

on January 10th about how, well, the Toronto police admits that they shot Devin Follin back

Speaker:

in February of 2023 without having needed to shoot him, you know, to quote directly what

Speaker:

they said, when there was no risk of bodily harm or death to any officer or member of the

Speaker:

public. And now they're going and asking for a budget increase that they're getting and

Speaker:

they're angry. that they're getting a budget increase and it's not as much as they wanted.

Speaker:

I mean, that's it's the story over and over again of their progressive politicians making

Speaker:

these stupid concessions that in the end don't win them anything. To concede to the Zionist

Speaker:

lobby, to a demonized Palestinian movement at the cost that it had or didn't matter. And

Speaker:

here with police. throwing them a bone and increasing their budget, even though that's a betrayal,

Speaker:

again, to the people that helped elect her and likely worked on her campaign, it's still not

Speaker:

going to be enough to win her, you know, the law and order vote. And it wasn't even enough

Speaker:

to keep the cops happy. So it's such a lose situation when those budgets go up. but not

Speaker:

only does it take away from the services people need and feed into an awful system, but it

Speaker:

is going to prevent us from effectively mounting campaigns. Because although my advice is often,

Speaker:

you know, double down and push back, it's very likely that one that could be met with violence.

Speaker:

I mean, folks from Avenue Road were hospitalized after police pushed them and whatnot. They

Speaker:

ended up with injuries. But court, right, between challenging these tickets and fighting arrests

Speaker:

and charter challenges, this is all a very expensive endeavor. And they know that. So that's frustrating.

Speaker:

It seems like no matter which way we go, we're going to end up in these courts and surely

Speaker:

we don't have an advantage there. I mean, that's not to say it's not an avenue. There are good

Speaker:

people mounting some necessary challenges. But in the meantime, I think you become so powerful

Speaker:

and so big and so defiant that, you know, they can't arrest us all mentality. But even as

Speaker:

I say that, I remember the G20 and hundreds, hundreds of people getting arrested and then

Speaker:

building special facilities just to store these people in really inhumane conditions. And I

Speaker:

think although they got backlash there. Even from both sides, I mean it was horrific. They,

Speaker:

uh, the public appetite is coming back. And I think it's our job to really curb that appetite

Speaker:

for police responses to... Well, fucking to everything, but especially to protests and

Speaker:

challenging politicians. You know, even Leah Gazan was out there tweeting like, this is

Speaker:

unacceptable that we're outside of Melanie Jolie's house. Like, what did you think? No justice,

Speaker:

no peace? Was just something for your t-shirt? Or it's just not applicable unless it might

Speaker:

come to you? Are we acting like politicians don't show up at our doorstep when they want

Speaker:

to be elected? You know, it's not like they keep their campaigning away from our doorstep.

Speaker:

And I'm sorry, but I'm not looking to worry about the comfort of somebody who's actively

Speaker:

enabling genocide. I don't see how anybody can try and justify such a thing. It's treating,

Speaker:

you know, it's, when people assume these roles, it doesn't have this blanket protection from

Speaker:

accountability as much as they want to think that, as much as they wanna think that they

Speaker:

can be, live a comfortable life while screwing over the rest of the world. No, that's not

Speaker:

how that works. Having just come back from Colombia, I have like a new found. desire for boldness,

Speaker:

you could say, because, you know, you go to places of the world that are actively being

Speaker:

screwed over by imperialism and colonialism, and you see, you know, the active effects and

Speaker:

the history of that, and then you also see how people there rise the fuck up en masse, are

Speaker:

met with violence, and they continue fighting back, and you hear about how social leaders

Speaker:

are killed constantly, and I can't help but think how... Here in the lions then, here at

Speaker:

the center of all of this, while I'm not saying that we're not gonna be met with violence,

Speaker:

we have the ability to be a hell of a lot more disruptive. And we have a responsibility to

Speaker:

the rest of the world, to the countries that we're screwing over, to the people who they

Speaker:

can't do anything about it in their homes, in their home countries, because they'll be killed,

Speaker:

and they are being killed. We have a responsibility to them. to do everything in our power to end

Speaker:

their suffering that we're causing that's being caused in our name. I'm not okay with that.

Speaker:

So if Melanie Joy wants to sleep comfortably at night, if these leaders want to be left

Speaker:

alone, then how about you leave other people in other countries the fuck alone first. Don't

Speaker:

go screwing over their lives and then wonder why people are showing up at your doorstep.

Speaker:

This is, and I mean this quite fucking literally. Like we need to understand the extent of the

Speaker:

harm that these people are causing. They're bold about it too because they've been doing

Speaker:

this for a very fucking long time and they've gotten used to our Canadian culture of you

Speaker:

know, oh no don't block the road it'll inconvenience traffic. Politicians have also gotten really

Speaker:

good at thwarting the public. You know, they have constituency days and hours and quite

Speaker:

often they're not even there. And if they do meet with you, they've got all these buffer

Speaker:

people to half answer questions for them. And so there's really no fucking accessibility

Speaker:

sometimes from journalists either. You know, the scrums are limited. And at what point can

Speaker:

we hold you accountable then? And it's just like every other avenue that we have where

Speaker:

you cut off. this and you cut off that and there's no real democracy. Well, guess what? It ends

Speaker:

up in the streets. There's no other outlet. Whenever a politician is doing something that

Speaker:

they know that they're getting backlash on, I can guarantee you that they're not answering

Speaker:

90% of journalists' calls. They'll answer the ones that they know are friendly or are going

Speaker:

to give them softball things so that they can make a public statement. But they're not answering

Speaker:

most of our calls at all. And I know because I, you know, we've tried like, seasoned journalists

Speaker:

with decades of experience who they're like, oh yeah, they're not going to get fucked. They're

Speaker:

not going to get back to us on this. Oh, there's no way we're going to reach them now. So exactly.

Speaker:

So just to like really emphasize what Jess is saying here, what exactly is the avenue for

Speaker:

holding them accountable? No, and it's not even just like literally, they don't answer our

Speaker:

calls. But in general, they're not answering our calls. If you're talking about the call

Speaker:

for a ceasefire. that has not happened. An escalation is inevitable. If you do not listen to the

Speaker:

people, they will speak louder. You have a kid, you know that, right? It ends up with screaming

Speaker:

and making a scene. And this is what's necessary if you're not going to listen. And if Melanie

Speaker:

Jolie is not going to call for a ceasefire or even decently respond to these calls, then

Speaker:

I'm sorry. you're going to have to be held accountable in some way. And that's not just going to be

Speaker:

some NDP MP standing up in question period and asking you a question. That doesn't fucking

Speaker:

count. They may think that's what they get paid for, but that doesn't fucking count. And the

Speaker:

city of Ottawa isn't gonna all of a sudden decide that megaphones aren't gonna be used in protests.

Speaker:

And Toronto police can't decide what neighborhoods are good and what neighborhoods are bad for

Speaker:

protests. for whom, when, and how long, what streets they can take, what businesses they'll

Speaker:

protect. I mean, we have to call an end to that, an absolute end to that. That can't just happen

Speaker:

through the courts. That has to happen with just absolute defiance. Yeah. Because that

Speaker:

is our duty, you know, to defy unjust laws. I know I brought up a few times today, but

Speaker:

you know, it's all my memory for some reason, but you know, like when people went to City

Speaker:

Hall to protest. budget last year. What happened? They were arrested. Is that not the right place

Speaker:

to go protest? Oh no, not then either. Not at City Hall either. That's apparently not okay

Speaker:

either. Were the politicians were all there in the room? Apparently that's not okay either.

Speaker:

So if they're gonna criminalize protesting where we're supposed to fucking protest as well,

Speaker:

what it is they're telling us to go

Speaker:

get it out of our systems and go home and nothing changes. That's what they want from us. And

Speaker:

we know history, we know our history, we know better than that, we know how we have achieved

Speaker:

every positive change that we've ever won. It's been won in the streets. It's been won by being

Speaker:

disruptive. And obviously, blueprints of disruption, this isn't new to our audience. You all know

Speaker:

this, like we talk about this constantly, but it's... We have to remind, we have to go out

Speaker:

and remind people of this because it's been very effective at making us forget that. But

Speaker:

like we've been saying, you know, like shout out to recent victories, you know, Algoma University,

Speaker:

that was one in the victory for those students, that was one in the streets. York Southwest

Speaker:

and Tenant Union, when they were being disrupted occupying their office, they won that battle.

Speaker:

They weren't supposed to be there. The cops came and told them they weren't supposed to

Speaker:

be there. They- stood up, showed face, stood their ground, they didn't get arrested, and

Speaker:

they won that battle. We know how these battles are won. We know our history. That is a wrap

Speaker:

on another episode of Blueprints of Disruption. Thank you for joining us. Also, a very big

Speaker:

thank you to the producer of our show, Santiago Halu-Quintero. Blueprints of Disruption is

Speaker:

an independent production operated cooperatively. You can follow us on Twitter at If you'd like

Speaker:

to help us continue disrupting the status quo, please share our content. And if you have the

Speaker:

means, consider becoming a patron. Not only does our support come from the progressive

Speaker:

community, so does our content. So reach out to us and let us know what or who we should

Speaker:

be amplifying. So until next time, keep disrupting.