I think that we should be quicker
to look within ourselves
2
00:00:04,212 --> 00:00:07,173
and notice our own fallenness
and brokenness
3
00:00:07,257 --> 00:00:10,844
than to, identify
4
00:00:11,594 --> 00:00:14,556
another person as the other or outside
5
00:00:15,098 --> 00:00:17,892
my camp of people.
6
00:00:17,892 --> 00:00:20,186
And so just the way it's used
7
00:00:20,186 --> 00:00:23,189
with just bolstering tribal identities
8
00:00:23,815 --> 00:00:26,818
can often be divisive.
9
00:00:26,818 --> 00:00:31,239
And I think that as Christians
were called to a kind of love and charity
10
00:00:31,239 --> 00:00:34,743
that shouldn't be quick to have tribal
alignments.
11
00:00:35,118 --> 00:00:38,496
And labeling others as woke,
I think, is often
12
00:00:39,414 --> 00:00:40,790
used to that effect.
13
00:00:46,421 --> 00:00:52,594
So there's a very popular thing
going on in culture right now.
14
00:00:53,011 --> 00:00:56,848
It’s being talked about by all kinds
of people, and it's particularly pertinent
15
00:00:56,848 --> 00:00:59,934
because we're recording this
in the early months of 2025.
16
00:01:00,351 --> 00:01:02,103
It's very much in the political scene.
17
00:01:02,103 --> 00:01:05,106
And that is this whole concept of woke
or wokeness.
18
00:01:05,440 --> 00:01:07,817
And we're going to talk about
that a little bit today.
19
00:01:08,943 --> 00:01:11,362
And so today I'm joined by Jaran.
20
00:01:11,362 --> 00:01:15,033
He helped me start Anabaptist
Perspectives a number of years ago.
21
00:01:15,033 --> 00:01:19,079
And Marlin, who's the current director of,
of Anabaptist Perspectives.
22
00:01:19,454 --> 00:01:22,123
And let's just open up with
23
00:01:22,123 --> 00:01:25,502
why are we talking
about the concept of wokeness?
24
00:01:25,543 --> 00:01:27,837
Jaran, why don't you kick us off?
25
00:01:27,837 --> 00:01:30,673
Like you said,
many people are talking about it now.
26
00:01:30,673 --> 00:01:33,343
It's a very live conversation
in the culture,
27
00:01:33,343 --> 00:01:36,346
and it's something that has reached
Anabaptist perspectives.
28
00:01:36,846 --> 00:01:39,849
Through some of the feedback
that we've gotten from audience members.
29
00:01:39,891 --> 00:01:43,520
You, you engage with the audience
feedback a fair bit, don't you?
30
00:01:43,561 --> 00:01:46,564
Yes. Yeah. Emails, Facebook comments.
31
00:01:47,065 --> 00:01:50,068
Telegram messages, YouTube comments,
all that comes to me.
32
00:01:50,443 --> 00:01:52,737
So I figured it would be pertinent.
33
00:01:52,737 --> 00:01:55,657
Just so people understand a bit
of the context what we're talking about.
34
00:01:55,657 --> 00:01:58,159
I'm gonna actually read some of these,
these comments.
35
00:01:58,159 --> 00:02:01,162
Often these
come on YouTube and things like that.
36
00:02:01,162 --> 00:02:02,831
So here's one.
37
00:02:02,831 --> 00:02:05,708
We did a episode a while ago, called
38
00:02:05,708 --> 00:02:07,710
We Must Make Schools Work
for All Children.
39
00:02:07,710 --> 00:02:09,587
And there's this bit of a long comment
here.
40
00:02:09,587 --> 00:02:13,341
And the person says that's because
we recognize that education is simply,
41
00:02:13,424 --> 00:02:17,220
simply discipleship of one's worldview
as it applies to different areas of life.
42
00:02:17,220 --> 00:02:19,013
We're discipling a little image
bearers of God
43
00:02:19,013 --> 00:02:22,350
who think biblically about maths
and science and history and art.
44
00:02:22,600 --> 00:02:24,644
We don't have to drag in Marxist
45
00:02:24,644 --> 00:02:28,148
DEI categories
which are antithetical to God's law.
46
00:02:28,148 --> 00:02:30,733
In order to do so, which is what Kuhns...
47
00:02:30,733 --> 00:02:35,363
And it was Ruth Anna Kuhns who, did that
episode seems to think that we need to do
48
00:02:35,405 --> 00:02:38,741
this is clear evidence
that Liberty University has gone, woke.
49
00:02:39,242 --> 00:02:40,410
She was a student at Liberty.
50
00:02:40,410 --> 00:02:41,161
Okay.
51
00:02:41,161 --> 00:02:43,121
I was wondering
if there was context for that. Okay.
52
00:02:43,121 --> 00:02:46,416
Perhaps Kuhns doesn't realize
that she's imbibed
53
00:02:46,499 --> 00:02:49,919
aspects of their ideology
as it pertains to education,
54
00:02:49,919 --> 00:02:52,422
but she's actually acting
as a water carrier for them
55
00:02:52,422 --> 00:02:56,342
and unwittingly helping them
to advance their anti-Christ revolution.
56
00:02:57,051 --> 00:02:59,554
So pretty strong feelings.
57
00:02:59,554 --> 00:03:01,764
Coming from there.
58
00:03:01,764 --> 00:03:04,142
Here's another one on trauma
informed churches.
59
00:03:04,142 --> 00:03:06,269
That was one you did with Janelle Glick.
60
00:03:06,269 --> 00:03:09,522
This person said one of the major
red flags with the trauma movement
61
00:03:09,522 --> 00:03:12,525
is that it
enables perpetual victimhood status.
62
00:03:12,817 --> 00:03:16,321
People never rise above whatever happened
or did not happen to them.
63
00:03:16,529 --> 00:03:19,532
They spend the rest of their lives,
the rest of their life
64
00:03:19,741 --> 00:03:22,911
wanting a a handkerchief
and a hand on the shoulder.
65
00:03:22,952 --> 00:03:25,914
This is simply not the way to help people.
66
00:03:25,955 --> 00:03:30,543
And there's a bunch more, a short
snippet someone says on another one.
67
00:03:30,793 --> 00:03:33,129
Please reject woke nonsense.
68
00:03:33,129 --> 00:03:34,380
So we get this kind of.
69
00:03:34,380 --> 00:03:36,174
So this is just a a slice.
70
00:03:36,174 --> 00:03:37,592
There's a bunch more of these.
71
00:03:37,592 --> 00:03:40,345
If people want to go comb
through the comments, you'll find more.
72
00:03:40,345 --> 00:03:41,930
So that's a bit of the context.
73
00:03:41,930 --> 00:03:43,431
And one of the things we like to do with
74
00:03:43,431 --> 00:03:47,268
the podcast is to engage
with the feedback we get, from listeners.
75
00:03:48,269 --> 00:03:50,521
So why don't we start with
76
00:03:50,521 --> 00:03:53,900
just a brief history of the term woke?
77
00:03:53,900 --> 00:03:56,653
Like, what are we even talking about
when that term is used?
78
00:03:56,653 --> 00:03:58,905
It is used so much
in so many different contexts.
79
00:03:58,905 --> 00:04:00,365
It's pretty easy. To lose track of.
80
00:04:00,365 --> 00:04:03,034
So yeah. Do you have anything on that?
81
00:04:03,034 --> 00:04:04,786
Can we divert that to Marlin?
82
00:04:04,786 --> 00:04:06,704
Marlin would you.
83
00:04:06,704 --> 00:04:07,997
Yeah. Yeah.
84
00:04:07,997 --> 00:04:08,498
yeah.
85
00:04:08,498 --> 00:04:11,501
I can't give a full history, but even
86
00:04:11,751 --> 00:04:14,295
even just a little bit
of what I've seen in my,
87
00:04:14,295 --> 00:04:17,298
my own lifetime
and how I've seen that meaning shift.
88
00:04:18,383 --> 00:04:20,885
I understand
the term goes back before my lifetime.
89
00:04:20,885 --> 00:04:23,846
Used by Africans.
90
00:04:24,264 --> 00:04:26,891
I think both African-American and,
91
00:04:26,891 --> 00:04:29,894
still from the continent of Africa.
92
00:04:30,728 --> 00:04:33,523
To simply to refer to the idea of,
you know,
93
00:04:33,523 --> 00:04:38,027
being awake
and particular being awake or aware of
94
00:04:38,987 --> 00:04:40,280
difficulties they faced
95
00:04:40,280 --> 00:04:43,283
or oppression or whatever.
96
00:04:43,324 --> 00:04:46,327
Obviously, as came forward,
got generalized.
97
00:04:47,412 --> 00:04:47,578
Yeah.
98
00:04:47,578 --> 00:04:50,290
I remember.
99
00:04:50,290 --> 00:04:53,293
I don't know, ten years ago
or something like that.
100
00:04:53,793 --> 00:04:57,213
Woke is a little bit more general term
just of, you know,
101
00:04:58,715 --> 00:05:01,718
somebody who's
102
00:05:01,884 --> 00:05:04,887
aware of things, aware of social dynamics
103
00:05:06,180 --> 00:05:08,933
and maybe some of
that was anti-Christian stuff,
104
00:05:08,933 --> 00:05:11,311
but it was also just like
105
00:05:11,311 --> 00:05:15,940
you know, if you're a man
and you're aware of cultural dynamics
106
00:05:15,940 --> 00:05:20,278
and what the cultural expectations are on
women, and that, whether it's double
107
00:05:20,278 --> 00:05:25,033
standards in regard to sexual morality
or how you look at dividing up
108
00:05:26,200 --> 00:05:30,330
housework, if both husband and wife
are working or whatever.
109
00:05:30,830 --> 00:05:33,833
So it's generally people
using it approvingly.
110
00:05:33,916 --> 00:05:38,379
And in ways that I don't know.
111
00:05:38,504 --> 00:05:43,593
I don't know what I think about all of
them, but, you know, relatively innocuous.
112
00:05:45,011 --> 00:05:46,804
And then
113
00:05:46,804 --> 00:05:49,140
I think a little later, I remember it
114
00:05:49,140 --> 00:05:52,143
being kind of used to indicate,
115
00:05:52,143 --> 00:05:54,854
I don't know, kind of insincerity
or something like,
116
00:05:54,854 --> 00:05:56,522
you know, somebody
considers themselves woke
117
00:05:56,522 --> 00:05:58,983
because they can talk about how this
or that is a problem.
118
00:05:58,983 --> 00:06:01,861
But, you know, they're not really engaged
in it with real life.
119
00:06:01,861 --> 00:06:03,446
They're
120
00:06:03,446 --> 00:06:06,199
drinking their lattes and
121
00:06:06,199 --> 00:06:07,658
making statements about something.
122
00:06:07,658 --> 00:06:10,661
And so in that sense, it was a little
pejorative in the sense of,
123
00:06:10,953 --> 00:06:13,998
you know, insincere
or not really having skin in the game,
124
00:06:13,998 --> 00:06:17,001
but wanting to make statements
about something.
125
00:06:17,418 --> 00:06:20,421
Or, and then, you know, lip service.
126
00:06:22,507 --> 00:06:25,259
But yeah, more recently
127
00:06:25,259 --> 00:06:26,302
Wikipedia.
128
00:06:26,302 --> 00:06:28,971
Thanks, Jaran,
for pointing out the Wikipedia article.
129
00:06:28,971 --> 00:06:33,643
Wikipedia says something like 2019,
I can't say exact dates.
130
00:06:33,893 --> 00:06:38,272
Where where the real shift to woke
131
00:06:38,272 --> 00:06:44,612
coming from people on the right
and using that as a a way of insulting,
132
00:06:45,613 --> 00:06:48,825
what
they're considering as left generally,
133
00:06:49,158 --> 00:06:52,328
again, with some of the same tones
about same ideas of,
134
00:06:52,370 --> 00:06:55,373
I think, insincere protest and so on.
135
00:06:55,665 --> 00:06:58,126
But it seems like recently
it has generalized to become kind
136
00:06:58,126 --> 00:07:01,129
of a catchall for,
137
00:07:01,379 --> 00:07:02,630
you know, kind of
138
00:07:02,630 --> 00:07:05,633
anything that's perceived as
139
00:07:06,134 --> 00:07:09,929
potentially on the left side
of the political spectrum or something,
140
00:07:09,929 --> 00:07:10,430
I don't know.
141
00:07:10,430 --> 00:07:12,306
and typically is by the right.
142
00:07:12,306 --> 00:07:14,642
use, by the right as derogatory?
143
00:07:14,642 --> 00:07:18,563
is there any other functional definitions
at this point where people would
144
00:07:18,938 --> 00:07:22,316
wish to use woke
as a description for their own approach,
145
00:07:22,316 --> 00:07:25,319
or is it only pejorative at this point?
146
00:07:25,486 --> 00:07:28,322
It seems to me the pejorative is dominant,
147
00:07:28,322 --> 00:07:31,075
but the idea of it as
148
00:07:31,075 --> 00:07:31,701
positive.
149
00:07:31,701 --> 00:07:34,495
Like we are awake,
we are aware of what's going on.
150
00:07:35,580 --> 00:07:38,166
I mean
that was, that was certainly claimed
151
00:07:38,166 --> 00:07:41,002
as a positive term not very long ago.
152
00:07:41,002 --> 00:07:42,879
I think some still would Yeah.
153
00:07:42,879 --> 00:07:43,337
Yeah.
154
00:07:43,337 --> 00:07:46,340
And I mean who wants to be asleep.
155
00:07:46,591 --> 00:07:46,924
Yeah.
156
00:07:46,924 --> 00:07:47,425
That's a great
157
00:07:47,425 --> 00:07:51,846
I guess I've never thought about this
quite like that but but it's awake
158
00:07:51,846 --> 00:07:55,975
aware as opposed to in your dull slumbers
not realizing what's going on.
159
00:07:55,975 --> 00:07:57,643
I mean that's the original idea.
160
00:07:57,643 --> 00:08:00,563
But then thinking in terms of woke,
161
00:08:00,563 --> 00:08:02,857
you know,
I don't know if I've ever heard it
162
00:08:02,857 --> 00:08:04,692
except in the context of someone who would
163
00:08:04,692 --> 00:08:07,737
claim I'm not woke
and I'm calling something else woke.
164
00:08:07,737 --> 00:08:12,033
And it's used as a, yeah, kind of insult
or a calling something out.
165
00:08:12,783 --> 00:08:16,954
Yeah, that makes a lot of sense, which
I think we were having a conversation
166
00:08:17,705 --> 00:08:21,417
at some point a few years ago
where we were talking about the engagement
167
00:08:21,417 --> 00:08:26,756
we have with our audience on the podcast,
and it seemed like 2019 or the Covid era.
168
00:08:26,756 --> 00:08:29,842
I guess you could say the comments started
169
00:08:29,842 --> 00:08:32,845
getting tended to be more
nasty or hostile.
170
00:08:33,012 --> 00:08:33,888
Do you remember this?
171
00:08:33,888 --> 00:08:36,891
It does seem like
we've had more of the oh,
172
00:08:37,099 --> 00:08:41,020
this is for whatever woke or whatever
buzzword seems like that's hitting
173
00:08:41,020 --> 00:08:44,148
the comments more now
than it would have seven years ago, say
174
00:08:44,190 --> 00:08:45,233
definitely intensified
175
00:08:46,234 --> 00:08:48,319
quite a bit over that time.
176
00:08:48,319 --> 00:08:49,904
Now that's interesting.
177
00:08:49,904 --> 00:08:53,115
Is there anything more either
you all want to add as far as context
178
00:08:53,115 --> 00:08:56,118
definitions, etc. on this?
179
00:08:56,285 --> 00:08:59,288
I mean, just to honor there's
a complex history to the term, and I think
180
00:08:59,664 --> 00:09:03,793
what we're going to be talking about
now is mostly kind of responding to
181
00:09:04,544 --> 00:09:07,630
to how it's used as a term of insult
or a term of
182
00:09:09,215 --> 00:09:12,635
insult or kind of a large negative
characterization.
183
00:09:12,927 --> 00:09:15,972
Most people are using
the most dominant use of it
184
00:09:15,972 --> 00:09:18,975
now seems to be as
185
00:09:19,183 --> 00:09:21,352
seeing it as a bad thing,
using it to criticize.
186
00:09:21,352 --> 00:09:24,355
And that's primarily
what we're going to be responding to here.
187
00:09:25,273 --> 00:09:25,523
Yeah.
188
00:09:25,523 --> 00:09:28,526
And let's and let's get into that where
189
00:09:28,651 --> 00:09:32,321
yeah some people use this
as a way of criticizing
190
00:09:32,321 --> 00:09:35,324
and just labeling people or things.
191
00:09:35,408 --> 00:09:37,076
Let's engage with that.
192
00:09:37,076 --> 00:09:40,204
What are some, some things
we want to add to that conversation.
193
00:09:40,204 --> 00:09:42,331
Ways. Perhaps we want to respond.
194
00:09:42,331 --> 00:09:45,167
Especially because yeah,
it does seem in more recent years
195
00:09:45,167 --> 00:09:48,421
that that has started
popping up in the comments more.
196
00:09:48,421 --> 00:09:50,339
And I'm sure those people who made
those comments will be like,
197
00:09:50,339 --> 00:09:52,466
well, that's
because your your podcast has shifted
198
00:09:52,466 --> 00:09:54,302
and it's become more woke and blah,
blah, blah, whatever.
199
00:09:54,302 --> 00:09:57,305
I know I've heard that from a few comments
here and there.
200
00:09:57,305 --> 00:10:00,308
It's an interesting, yeah, I'd be curious
201
00:10:00,308 --> 00:10:02,935
what you'd have to say about about that
Jaran.
202
00:10:02,935 --> 00:10:07,440
This is more about the way
the term is used than the substance behind
203
00:10:07,440 --> 00:10:11,402
what the term actually mean, that there's
definitely a conversation there.
204
00:10:11,861 --> 00:10:17,158
But in general, I am sad about the way
I often hear the term
205
00:10:17,742 --> 00:10:20,870
being used for a few reasons,
one of which is that
206
00:10:20,870 --> 00:10:25,708
it's often
quite sloppy in the way that it's applied.
207
00:10:27,126 --> 00:10:28,669
There are
208
00:10:28,669 --> 00:10:31,589
a variety of different issues
that it could legitimately be
209
00:10:31,589 --> 00:10:34,592
in reference to,
some of which Marlin referred to,
210
00:10:34,592 --> 00:10:37,970
but when it's just used
generally as a catchall
211
00:10:38,179 --> 00:10:41,182
for a particular approach
to issues that we find disagreeable,
212
00:10:41,390 --> 00:10:45,603
I think it's quite sloppy
and not helpful for constructive dialog
213
00:10:47,271 --> 00:10:50,232
also, and this especially applies
214
00:10:50,941 --> 00:10:53,903
when used among brothers and sisters
in the church.
215
00:10:53,903 --> 00:10:57,615
But my same concern would be with anybody.
216
00:10:58,199 --> 00:11:01,369
It's used to create tribes of us
versus them.
217
00:11:02,244 --> 00:11:05,414
Often
when used pejoratively, your are woke.
218
00:11:06,207 --> 00:11:08,584
Therefore I am not woke.
219
00:11:08,584 --> 00:11:13,005
Implicitly I have the moral high ground
when I use it that way, and I'm labeling
220
00:11:13,005 --> 00:11:18,344
somebody else's approach to things
as morally objectionable or inferior.
221
00:11:19,720 --> 00:11:22,723
I think that we should be quicker
to look within ourselves
222
00:11:23,391 --> 00:11:26,352
and notice our own fallenness
and brokenness
223
00:11:26,435 --> 00:11:30,022
than to, identify
224
00:11:30,773 --> 00:11:35,528
another person
as the other or outside my camp of people.
225
00:11:37,363 --> 00:11:38,072
And so just
226
00:11:38,072 --> 00:11:41,784
the way it's used with just bolstering
tribal identities
227
00:11:43,285 --> 00:11:46,288
can often be divisive.
228
00:11:46,288 --> 00:11:50,710
And I think that as Christians
were called to a kind of love and charity
229
00:11:50,710 --> 00:11:55,047
that shouldn't be quick
to have tribal alignments.
230
00:11:57,299 --> 00:11:59,343
And labeling others as woke,
231
00:11:59,343 --> 00:12:02,596
I think, is often used to that effect.
232
00:12:04,348 --> 00:12:05,808
Do you have any examples.
233
00:12:05,808 --> 00:12:08,811
There's some bring this down to earth
a bit.
234
00:12:09,395 --> 00:12:10,604
There's examples everywhere.
235
00:12:10,604 --> 00:12:12,898
It's a it's a huge conversation in culture
right now.
236
00:12:12,898 --> 00:12:15,484
Like we read some comments
for how people apply it to us.
237
00:12:15,484 --> 00:12:17,319
I think it's kind of sad.
238
00:12:17,319 --> 00:12:20,614
I suspect that we're largely
on the same page with the people
239
00:12:20,614 --> 00:12:23,617
who wish to criticize us.
240
00:12:25,035 --> 00:12:26,620
In evangelicalism right now.
241
00:12:26,620 --> 00:12:30,249
I think, what was the publication
Christian Post,
242
00:12:30,249 --> 00:12:35,004
I think this week, and we're
recording this in February, did an article
243
00:12:35,963 --> 00:12:37,173
writing about some
244
00:12:37,173 --> 00:12:40,176
significant disruption
that Wheaton College is experiencing,
245
00:12:40,176 --> 00:12:43,179
where some alumni have decided
that Wheaton is woke
246
00:12:43,304 --> 00:12:45,389
and the pushing
for some change in leadership.
247
00:12:45,389 --> 00:12:46,140
There.
248
00:12:46,140 --> 00:12:49,769
so that that's one particular occurrence
of Christian against Christian,
249
00:12:51,395 --> 00:12:53,147
tension
250
00:12:53,147 --> 00:12:56,150
along the lines of woke versus anti-woke.
251
00:12:56,442 --> 00:13:00,196
So I find it interesting,
I think you're right
252
00:13:00,905 --> 00:13:04,366
that, that, you know, putting out the term
woke as a
253
00:13:05,659 --> 00:13:10,539
critique, often accomplishes
exactly that, the kind of tribalism
254
00:13:10,539 --> 00:13:13,542
or a little of the sense
of moral superiority.
255
00:13:14,418 --> 00:13:17,421
But not very long ago,
256
00:13:18,130 --> 00:13:20,800
when people were started using woke
257
00:13:20,800 --> 00:13:23,010
as a form of critique,
or when I kind of encountered it,
258
00:13:23,010 --> 00:13:26,222
as you know,
we use woke to critique your position.
259
00:13:26,222 --> 00:13:29,225
It was precisely critiquing people for
260
00:13:29,642 --> 00:13:32,645
a kind of self-righteousness, because,
261
00:13:32,686 --> 00:13:35,856
you know, I know what to protest better
than, you know what to protest.
262
00:13:36,565 --> 00:13:40,236
And so woke was the using
the term woke to criticize
263
00:13:40,236 --> 00:13:41,862
people was originally meant to criticize
264
00:13:41,862 --> 00:13:43,906
that kind of self-righteousness
and tribalism.
265
00:13:44,949 --> 00:13:45,741
That is
266
00:13:45,741 --> 00:13:49,453
that's an interesting point
because I remember hearing some of this,
267
00:13:49,453 --> 00:13:49,745
you know,
268
00:13:49,745 --> 00:13:53,874
say five years ago when someone would,
would have some meaningful feedback of
269
00:13:53,916 --> 00:13:55,668
maybe an interaction
with someone they knew.
270
00:13:55,668 --> 00:13:59,880
And like that felt awfully whatever
woke this that because they're,
271
00:13:59,922 --> 00:14:02,174
they're, you know, missing this
and then felt like
272
00:14:02,174 --> 00:14:05,761
there was a little more engagement
with what was going on and almost like
273
00:14:06,262 --> 00:14:07,721
they were hiding behind.
274
00:14:07,721 --> 00:14:10,766
Oh, I did the I checked the right box,
you know, on the social justice whatever.
275
00:14:10,766 --> 00:14:14,228
And then it became this criticism
and that label kept getting applied to it.
276
00:14:14,228 --> 00:14:14,812
And then over the years,
277
00:14:14,812 --> 00:14:18,607
it almost feels like
that's morphed to the point where I think
278
00:14:18,899 --> 00:14:19,775
maybe I'm not sure
279
00:14:19,775 --> 00:14:21,902
if you used this exact word,
but almost like a sloppily
280
00:14:21,902 --> 00:14:24,905
applied to all kinds of things
that we end up disagreeing with.
281
00:14:25,447 --> 00:14:28,075
I'm speculating
this is all just things I've kind of seen.
282
00:14:28,075 --> 00:14:29,493
I'm like, oh,
that's interesting and whatever.
283
00:14:29,493 --> 00:14:32,496
And it feels like
the term is being more sloppily applied.
284
00:14:32,538 --> 00:14:36,000
To where now, if you're,
I don't know, a vegetarian now you're woke
285
00:14:36,000 --> 00:14:39,128
or you don't use a plastic straw,
you're woke or you're this or that.
286
00:14:39,169 --> 00:14:41,922
It just feels like
it's used in so many different contexts.
287
00:14:42,882 --> 00:14:45,009
Does it have much meaning anymore,
288
00:14:45,009 --> 00:14:48,012
or is it just a word we throw around
at people we disagree with?
289
00:14:48,554 --> 00:14:49,555
I don't really know.
290
00:14:49,555 --> 00:14:52,474
Honestly. I'm really confused. Which is
maybe why we're having the conversation.
291
00:14:52,474 --> 00:14:54,310
Because you guys
can help me out with this.
292
00:14:54,310 --> 00:14:57,730
But do you resonate with that
like that sloppily or hastily apply
293
00:14:57,730 --> 00:15:00,232
like I disagree with you
so hey, you're you're woke.
294
00:15:00,232 --> 00:15:03,235
You don't we don't align or whatever.
295
00:15:03,527 --> 00:15:03,819
Yeah.
296
00:15:03,819 --> 00:15:06,614
And it the way it's used
sloppily is definitely functional.
297
00:15:06,614 --> 00:15:12,286
If we're interested in forming lines of
tribal identity or those we disagree with.
298
00:15:12,286 --> 00:15:16,957
But I would say there's
probably not an appropriate function
299
00:15:16,957 --> 00:15:19,960
that we should be seeking out.
300
00:15:20,085 --> 00:15:23,714
So I would be interested
in can we just list some of the
301
00:15:24,757 --> 00:15:26,634
things that
302
00:15:26,634 --> 00:15:29,637
woke is intended to catch.
303
00:15:30,220 --> 00:15:32,014
And you mentioned a few things.
304
00:15:32,014 --> 00:15:35,768
You know I'm thinking things might be a
little more serious than types of straws.
305
00:15:37,686 --> 00:15:40,689
Although environmental concern
is a serious matter.
306
00:15:40,940 --> 00:15:43,943
Yeah that would definitely though
definitely be one.
307
00:15:44,068 --> 00:15:47,154
Like I guess when I, when I hear the term
308
00:15:47,154 --> 00:15:50,491
woke used as a kind of
a, a blanket statement,
309
00:15:51,408 --> 00:15:54,703
I think they're trying to catch
a lot of things under that,
310
00:15:55,788 --> 00:15:59,083
things
that we might assess in various ways.
311
00:16:01,210 --> 00:16:04,213
It does seem to be applied to anybody
with a,
312
00:16:05,214 --> 00:16:07,716
you know, some sense of historical guilt
or something.
313
00:16:07,716 --> 00:16:10,386
You feel guilty
because of what your ancestors did.
314
00:16:10,386 --> 00:16:13,347
That gets is labeled as woke.
315
00:16:13,347 --> 00:16:15,599
If you feel,
316
00:16:15,599 --> 00:16:19,269
you know, any kind of sense
of kind of responsibility because of your,
317
00:16:20,479 --> 00:16:21,855
you know, social position,
318
00:16:21,855 --> 00:16:25,234
class or race
that quickly gets described as woke.
319
00:16:25,859 --> 00:16:28,862
One thing that was mentioned
in the comments,
320
00:16:29,363 --> 00:16:32,116
if there's a sense of,
321
00:16:32,116 --> 00:16:35,995
stretching out victimhood
and playing off of being a victim
322
00:16:36,578 --> 00:16:39,581
that gets labeled as woke,
323
00:16:40,499 --> 00:16:43,544
if you're in favor of same
324
00:16:43,544 --> 00:16:46,964
sex relationships,
that gets labeled as woke.
325
00:16:47,423 --> 00:16:50,259
If you.
326
00:16:50,259 --> 00:16:52,970
Want people to
327
00:16:52,970 --> 00:16:55,556
freely identify with,
328
00:16:55,556 --> 00:16:58,600
you know, whatever gender they want,
329
00:16:58,600 --> 00:17:02,813
separate from their biological sex
that's labeled as woke.
330
00:17:04,106 --> 00:17:06,942
There's probably a bunch more things that
get caught in there, but I don't know.
331
00:17:06,942 --> 00:17:09,945
Does that resonate? It's the kind of a
332
00:17:10,154 --> 00:17:13,949
a large kind of group of things that
the term I think is intended to catch.
333
00:17:14,283 --> 00:17:18,704
but generally the observation
of unequal distribution of power
334
00:17:18,704 --> 00:17:24,460
or oppressor versus oppressed,
powerful versus disenfranchized
335
00:17:25,044 --> 00:17:30,049
noticing those kind of dichotomies,
I think often is a factor in this.
336
00:17:30,883 --> 00:17:32,051
So that that could apply with
337
00:17:33,218 --> 00:17:35,471
gender, sexuality,
338
00:17:35,471 --> 00:17:37,848
race, ethnicity.
339
00:17:37,848 --> 00:17:40,309
Right. Perhaps a bit broader as well.
340
00:17:40,309 --> 00:17:44,146
You know, wealth,
anything that seems connected
341
00:17:44,146 --> 00:17:47,900
to critical theory or especially critical
race theory gets put there.
342
00:17:48,192 --> 00:17:48,859
Yeah Definitely.
343
00:17:48,859 --> 00:17:52,362
Well actually okay, so you mentioned that
because there was another quote,
344
00:17:52,362 --> 00:17:53,655
I have a whole list here, but
345
00:17:53,655 --> 00:17:57,618
there was another one where we interviewed
the historian John Ruth, about
346
00:17:57,618 --> 00:18:01,997
How did indigenous lands in Pennsylvania
become Mennonite farms, like in Lancaster?
347
00:18:01,997 --> 00:18:02,790
And he did this
348
00:18:02,790 --> 00:18:06,001
research of the land that he lived on
and wrote this book about it.
349
00:18:06,376 --> 00:18:08,879
And someone left this comment.
350
00:18:08,879 --> 00:18:09,963
Just remember, also,
351
00:18:09,963 --> 00:18:12,966
this stance that this man is taking
is a form of critical theory
352
00:18:13,175 --> 00:18:17,012
which is born out of Marxism and pits
the oppressors versus the oppressed.
353
00:18:17,012 --> 00:18:20,641
So that was I think you mentioned that you
you also did as well that power dynamic
354
00:18:20,641 --> 00:18:21,183
and so forth.
355
00:18:21,183 --> 00:18:24,520
This boomer has it so good
all his life that that the land
356
00:18:24,520 --> 00:18:27,731
that his ancestors gave him,
that he has no other recourse
357
00:18:27,731 --> 00:18:30,734
than to just sell out
to, to his future generations.
358
00:18:30,943 --> 00:18:32,653
That calling him a sellout, basically.
359
00:18:33,612 --> 00:18:34,655
So that would be one.
360
00:18:34,655 --> 00:18:38,158
Marxist, DEI categories was in another
one of the quotes.
361
00:18:38,534 --> 00:18:38,992
I think that
362
00:18:38,992 --> 00:18:42,287
comes into some of the frameworks
you were describing with the maybe power
363
00:18:42,287 --> 00:18:47,126
dynamics and these Marxist, frameworks
that are being in this
364
00:18:47,292 --> 00:18:52,214
that is being accused, that is being,
portrayed, in these episodes.
365
00:18:52,548 --> 00:18:54,508
Which again, I don’t know. It
kind of surprised me.
366
00:18:54,508 --> 00:18:58,846
Like I it's not really what I saw there,
but like but again, these things are
367
00:18:58,929 --> 00:19:01,932
these
labels are used in so many different ways.
368
00:19:02,850 --> 00:19:05,102
It's feels so hard to pin down.
369
00:19:05,102 --> 00:19:08,021
I guess, and that's
why I'm struggling a little bit with this.
370
00:19:08,021 --> 00:19:11,984
I don't know if that just that maybe
just made things more confusing, Yeah.
371
00:19:12,234 --> 00:19:14,862
I mean, that's why
I mean, I agree with you, Jaran. Like,
372
00:19:16,363 --> 00:19:19,199
you know, the term is
373
00:19:19,199 --> 00:19:21,827
generally unhelpful.
374
00:19:21,827 --> 00:19:24,037
You know,
375
00:19:24,037 --> 00:19:27,040
at one point I think the term woke was
376
00:19:27,374 --> 00:19:31,545
and it could be helpful at one point
within my memory not very long ago.
377
00:19:32,171 --> 00:19:35,174
I think the term could be helpful
in kind of pointing out.
378
00:19:36,258 --> 00:19:39,219
You know, a kind of glib,
379
00:19:39,219 --> 00:19:42,222
glib, shallow.
380
00:19:42,973 --> 00:19:46,018
You know, political correctness
or a certain political orientation,
381
00:19:46,894 --> 00:19:49,563
you know, a woker than thou
because you say the right thing
382
00:19:49,563 --> 00:19:51,273
and kind of poking fun at it.
383
00:19:51,273 --> 00:19:54,860
Yeah, I think it had a use at that point.
384
00:19:55,319 --> 00:19:59,740
But at this point, with it being used
for that kind of a blanket, things like,
385
00:20:00,616 --> 00:20:03,619
I don't know, it's
a term used for anymore.
386
00:20:04,036 --> 00:20:07,581
And I think it had a use to
and it's more original sense of,
387
00:20:09,333 --> 00:20:11,001
you know, are you awake?
388
00:20:11,001 --> 00:20:13,086
Are you aware of
389
00:20:13,086 --> 00:20:16,465
how society functions
and not overly naive?
390
00:20:17,549 --> 00:20:19,760
And I'm sure there was more dimensions
to that.
391
00:20:19,760 --> 00:20:20,844
But, you know, that was part of it.
392
00:20:20,844 --> 00:20:24,264
And, you know, I think that was useful
for people who were using it.
393
00:20:26,475 --> 00:20:26,850
Yeah.
394
00:20:26,850 --> 00:20:29,853
Any more that you want to add there.
395
00:20:30,646 --> 00:20:33,273
Based on maybe even the, the Marxist,
396
00:20:33,273 --> 00:20:37,819
the DEI element is packaged with woke
ism or woke whatever.
397
00:20:37,819 --> 00:20:43,325
You want to frame that as do we want
to, go down those rabbit holes at all.
398
00:20:43,367 --> 00:20:45,994
Do you have anything else you want to add?
399
00:20:45,994 --> 00:20:48,789
I mean, can we do just a
400
00:20:48,789 --> 00:20:51,083
very basic,
401
00:20:51,083 --> 00:20:54,294
a very basic
and a philosophical reflection on,
402
00:20:55,337 --> 00:20:57,339
you know, what is a theory,
403
00:20:57,339 --> 00:20:59,841
what is critical theory or whatever?
404
00:20:59,841 --> 00:21:01,718
Yeah. And so on.
405
00:21:03,720 --> 00:21:04,304
And if you
406
00:21:04,304 --> 00:21:07,849
wanna know what critical theory is, find
somebody who has studied it extensively.
407
00:21:08,475 --> 00:21:11,144
But when we're talking about a theory
408
00:21:11,144 --> 00:21:14,147
in this sense, we're talking about.
409
00:21:15,148 --> 00:21:17,776
You know, tools to understand the world.
410
00:21:17,776 --> 00:21:20,737
It's a set of vocabulary, just like,
411
00:21:21,571 --> 00:21:24,449
you know, the theory of gravity
412
00:21:24,449 --> 00:21:27,452
gives you tools, gives you equations to
413
00:21:27,828 --> 00:21:29,621
describe the world.
414
00:21:29,621 --> 00:21:31,832
Basic Newtonian physics gives you tools
415
00:21:31,832 --> 00:21:35,294
to describe the world that work pretty
well for describing a lot of things.
416
00:21:35,502 --> 00:21:37,879
It doesn't describe the world perfectly.
417
00:21:37,879 --> 00:21:41,008
Because,
you know, you need quantum mechanics
418
00:21:41,883 --> 00:21:45,637
and general relativity and all of that
to more fully describe the world.
419
00:21:45,721 --> 00:21:50,350
But Newtonian physics was helpful still is
extremely helpful because it describes
420
00:21:51,393 --> 00:21:53,812
the world we interact with very well.
421
00:21:53,812 --> 00:21:58,483
So let's wrap that around something
like, again, critical theory.
422
00:21:59,109 --> 00:22:00,944
It's saying here's some
423
00:22:00,944 --> 00:22:04,406
it's here's some concepts, some tools
we can use to understand the world.
424
00:22:05,824 --> 00:22:08,160
Now, one
of the big reasons that Christians
425
00:22:08,160 --> 00:22:11,246
become suspicious of that is, well,
where are these concepts coming from?
426
00:22:12,122 --> 00:22:14,583
Are these concepts rooted in,
427
00:22:14,583 --> 00:22:17,586
you know, other beliefs that are.
428
00:22:19,755 --> 00:22:22,424
Deeply unchristian.
429
00:22:22,424 --> 00:22:24,843
And some of them are.
430
00:22:24,843 --> 00:22:26,887
But that doesn't mean that
431
00:22:26,887 --> 00:22:29,723
everything that somebody is seeing who's
432
00:22:29,723 --> 00:22:32,726
using critical theory to describe it,
433
00:22:32,893 --> 00:22:35,270
maybe it's not the best way
to describe it.
434
00:22:35,270 --> 00:22:38,231
Maybe critical theory is not the best tool
for describing this.
435
00:22:38,231 --> 00:22:41,234
It doesn't mean that the thing
they're describing doesn't exist.
436
00:22:41,360 --> 00:22:44,279
This means that maybe there's
a better way to describe it,
437
00:22:44,279 --> 00:22:46,448
and it doesn't mean that,
438
00:22:46,448 --> 00:22:49,451
you know, the term trauma is now
439
00:22:50,035 --> 00:22:53,038
not a helpful word for describing things,
440
00:22:53,538 --> 00:22:56,083
or for that matter, that diversity
or inclusion are not helpful
441
00:22:56,083 --> 00:22:57,709
words for describing things
442
00:22:57,709 --> 00:23:01,421
just because they get used
in theoretical frameworks that,
443
00:23:02,422 --> 00:23:02,923
you know, the
444
00:23:02,923 --> 00:23:05,926
framework as a whole
might be messed up, but
445
00:23:06,051 --> 00:23:08,720
I don't I don't think that means
446
00:23:08,720 --> 00:23:11,723
that diversity or equity or inclusion
447
00:23:12,224 --> 00:23:16,478
or trauma are words that are somehow
no longer helpful or don't help us
448
00:23:16,478 --> 00:23:18,230
see things.
449
00:23:18,230 --> 00:23:21,233
So I'm curious about something
you're talking about
450
00:23:22,984 --> 00:23:25,779
theory in this sense as a framework.
451
00:23:25,779 --> 00:23:29,866
I think that most people wouldn't
be conscious of a theory
452
00:23:29,866 --> 00:23:32,911
that they're operating with,
although I do know that some are.
453
00:23:32,911 --> 00:23:36,790
I first learned about critical theory,
in a
454
00:23:38,166 --> 00:23:41,878
introductory literary theory class,
at a university I was at at the time.
455
00:23:42,546 --> 00:23:45,715
And so I understood it
as a literary theory.
456
00:23:46,299 --> 00:23:48,051
And so I know that
457
00:23:48,051 --> 00:23:50,011
in academic study
458
00:23:50,011 --> 00:23:53,014
of literature it’s something that
459
00:23:53,348 --> 00:23:55,809
people are very conscious of.
460
00:23:55,809 --> 00:23:58,770
But outside of that context is that.
461
00:24:00,355 --> 00:24:00,981
What in what way
462
00:24:00,981 --> 00:24:03,984
do people operate with the theory?
463
00:24:04,025 --> 00:24:07,112
What way has it left
academia and entered the mainstream?
464
00:24:07,320 --> 00:24:09,656
And is it actually it?
Has it actually done that?
465
00:24:09,656 --> 00:24:12,159
I don't know how much it has done that.
466
00:24:12,159 --> 00:24:13,869
It has much like woke.
467
00:24:13,869 --> 00:24:17,581
And much the same time CRT Critical Race
468
00:24:17,581 --> 00:24:20,584
theory became
469
00:24:20,792 --> 00:24:23,795
a way for again.
470
00:24:24,629 --> 00:24:27,257
Basically the same set that uses woke
471
00:24:27,257 --> 00:24:31,553
as a criticism started using the term
well that CRT as a criticism.
472
00:24:32,262 --> 00:24:35,390
And there's lots of things
473
00:24:35,390 --> 00:24:39,060
that can be labeled CRT
that can be criticized.
474
00:24:40,228 --> 00:24:43,231
You know, to
what extent is the theory operating?
475
00:24:45,233 --> 00:24:46,943
I don't think that everybody
476
00:24:46,943 --> 00:24:49,946
who's using the word trauma and
477
00:24:50,572 --> 00:24:53,575
diversity is, you know,
478
00:24:54,034 --> 00:24:56,578
yeah,
they're operating out of the framework,
479
00:24:56,578 --> 00:24:59,956
out of certainly not explicitly
operating out of an articulated
480
00:25:01,041 --> 00:25:03,293
critical theory framework.
481
00:25:03,293 --> 00:25:06,296
I think one of the concerns
expressed in the comments is,
482
00:25:06,796 --> 00:25:09,799
well, the way they're talking.
483
00:25:10,634 --> 00:25:12,594
Reveals that they are
484
00:25:12,594 --> 00:25:15,347
thinking according to that
485
00:25:15,347 --> 00:25:18,058
theory, that's the articulation.
486
00:25:18,058 --> 00:25:22,270
Again, I am not familiar
enough with the details of,
487
00:25:23,605 --> 00:25:26,608
you know, forms of critical theory
or whatever.
488
00:25:27,984 --> 00:25:29,528
When I hear critical theory
489
00:25:29,528 --> 00:25:32,531
at a very general level and,
490
00:25:32,739 --> 00:25:36,201
and I'm thinking more from philosophy
than literature,
491
00:25:36,910 --> 00:25:39,913
I'm thinking.
492
00:25:40,830 --> 00:25:45,460
Of really a consciousness of,
493
00:25:47,337 --> 00:25:48,505
you know,
494
00:25:48,505 --> 00:25:51,174
looking below the surface
just a little bit.
495
00:25:51,174 --> 00:25:54,177
So critical theory.
496
00:25:55,512 --> 00:25:58,515
Likes to look at
497
00:25:58,640 --> 00:26:00,267
the statements that we make.
498
00:26:00,267 --> 00:26:03,270
We say, why we do this?
499
00:26:03,270 --> 00:26:07,482
And look at them and say, well, what's.
500
00:26:09,818 --> 00:26:12,821
You know, what's the social dynamic there?
501
00:26:13,613 --> 00:26:16,408
What's
502
00:26:16,408 --> 00:26:18,118
happening there?
503
00:26:18,118 --> 00:26:20,287
I've taken example
a little further, in the past,
504
00:26:21,913 --> 00:26:24,416
we've got the American founding documents.
505
00:26:24,416 --> 00:26:27,085
You got the Declaration of Independence,
506
00:26:27,085 --> 00:26:30,046
and you've got famous language like,
507
00:26:30,046 --> 00:26:33,049
you know, all men are created equal
and so on,
508
00:26:33,883 --> 00:26:36,845
and endowed by their creator
with certain inalienable rights.
509
00:26:37,262 --> 00:26:40,265
And then you have a constitution
that gets passed where
510
00:26:42,100 --> 00:26:44,227
what is it a slave is
511
00:26:44,227 --> 00:26:47,230
is it 2/5 of a person or 3/5 of a person?
512
00:26:47,856 --> 00:26:50,025
I forget which way
that went in the Constitution
513
00:26:50,025 --> 00:26:53,653
for the sake of determining,
you know, how much representation
514
00:26:53,653 --> 00:26:56,656
a state gets and counting the population
for political purposes?
515
00:26:57,741 --> 00:27:00,285
Well, a kind of very basic level,
516
00:27:00,285 --> 00:27:04,623
I think, of critical theory as picking up
on the difference between here's
517
00:27:04,623 --> 00:27:08,752
the stated rhetoric and here's
what got into the Constitution about
518
00:27:09,794 --> 00:27:12,547
people who were enslaved
and how they were actually treated
519
00:27:12,547 --> 00:27:14,591
in regards to being equal.
520
00:27:14,591 --> 00:27:17,469
And it things get obviously
a lot more sophisticated than that.
521
00:27:18,887 --> 00:27:21,890
And critical theory also gets kicked.
522
00:27:22,891 --> 00:27:24,309
Yeah,
523
00:27:24,309 --> 00:27:27,312
I think it does get carried away to where.
524
00:27:28,480 --> 00:27:29,356
You can get into that
525
00:27:29,356 --> 00:27:33,568
mode of operating where
that kind of suspicion that, you know,
526
00:27:33,568 --> 00:27:37,781
what's being said is not real,
that suspicion gets carried so far that
527
00:27:39,699 --> 00:27:42,702
you have a hard time
seeing sincerity anywhere.
528
00:27:42,786 --> 00:27:45,789
The hermeneutic of suspicion becomes.
529
00:27:46,373 --> 00:27:48,750
You have enough suspicion
to expose everything
530
00:27:48,750 --> 00:27:50,418
to where it seems like
there's nothing left.
531
00:27:50,418 --> 00:27:54,172
You don't recognize any goodness
or take things at face value.
532
00:27:54,964 --> 00:27:57,425
And of course, somebody who's actually
doing critical theory is probably going
533
00:27:57,425 --> 00:28:00,595
to say that I'm caricaturing them,
and I probably am,
534
00:28:01,554 --> 00:28:04,974
but I think that's what
some people are reacting to.
535
00:28:04,974 --> 00:28:07,686
And, you know, to see critical
theory is a bad thing is,
536
00:28:09,020 --> 00:28:10,647
oh, well,
you know, this is critical theory.
537
00:28:10,647 --> 00:28:12,899
This is what
538
00:28:12,899 --> 00:28:15,360
deconstructs everything, doesn't accept
539
00:28:15,360 --> 00:28:18,363
anything at face value, subverts,
540
00:28:19,489 --> 00:28:21,408
subverts authority.
541
00:28:21,408 --> 00:28:23,034
So on,
542
00:28:23,034 --> 00:28:25,620
I don't know,
I have somebody who actually studied
543
00:28:25,620 --> 00:28:28,623
literary critical theory,
which is probably where this originated.
544
00:28:28,915 --> 00:28:30,458
one junior level class.
545
00:28:30,458 --> 00:28:31,710
But anyway, get into this at the end.
546
00:28:31,710 --> 00:28:34,713
But I would have mentioned Marx, Freud,
and Nietzsche seen as the,
547
00:28:35,880 --> 00:28:38,717
Marx, Freud and Friedrich Nietzsche,
548
00:28:38,717 --> 00:28:43,471
Masters of suspicion,
often used in literary theory.
549
00:28:43,596 --> 00:28:46,599
And I don't know how this connects
with philosophy,
550
00:28:46,975 --> 00:28:50,603
but especially, Marx and Nietzsche,
seeing things through economic lens
551
00:28:50,603 --> 00:28:53,773
or the lens of power
and so when you're reading a text,
552
00:28:54,190 --> 00:28:57,193
you notice
it says one thing on the surface,
553
00:28:57,277 --> 00:29:00,238
but you have the suspicion that
if you look underneath, there's something
554
00:29:00,238 --> 00:29:05,452
nefarious going on in terms of power
hierarchies or economic disparities.
555
00:29:07,036 --> 00:29:07,370
It seems
556
00:29:07,370 --> 00:29:10,373
like that makes things,
much more complex.
557
00:29:11,124 --> 00:29:11,541
Right?
558
00:29:11,541 --> 00:29:14,419
And it could almost muddy
the waters a bit.
559
00:29:14,419 --> 00:29:15,754
Is that true?
560
00:29:15,754 --> 00:29:19,632
Or is that just the suspicion that people
have of this suspicion or something?
561
00:29:20,300 --> 00:29:21,676
You know what I’m saying,
562
00:29:21,676 --> 00:29:24,971
because like people
when I talk to them about like, you know,
563
00:29:24,971 --> 00:29:29,392
critical theory or CRT, it seems like
that's the counter reaction to it.
564
00:29:29,768 --> 00:29:32,520
And then they're reacting
off of each other and it just gets
565
00:29:32,520 --> 00:29:34,397
it just gets so shrill and out of control.
566
00:29:34,397 --> 00:29:37,400
You just you don't even know
what you're looking at anymore.
567
00:29:37,484 --> 00:29:40,069
But maybe I'm totally missed
and misreading this
568
00:29:40,069 --> 00:29:42,405
speaking from my own experience, it can.
569
00:29:42,405 --> 00:29:46,034
When one functions that way regularly,
570
00:29:47,535 --> 00:29:49,788
it can make me a bit
571
00:29:51,080 --> 00:29:52,248
less trusting,
572
00:29:52,248 --> 00:29:55,251
more mistrusting than I ideally would be.
573
00:29:55,919 --> 00:29:58,922
It can also sap some of the enjoyment
574
00:29:59,297 --> 00:30:02,550
of engagement,
in my case of art and literature,
575
00:30:03,259 --> 00:30:06,721
if you're always looking under the surface
and suspecting that there's something
576
00:30:07,764 --> 00:30:10,725
pernicious going on.
577
00:30:11,643 --> 00:30:12,310
Yeah.
578
00:30:12,310 --> 00:30:15,313
And so
maybe when people throw these labels out
579
00:30:15,939 --> 00:30:19,108
as a derogatory thing
of like your woke or critical theory
580
00:30:19,108 --> 00:30:23,363
or this or that, it's, reacting to what
you just described, potentially.
581
00:30:23,488 --> 00:30:26,574
Is that perhaps what's going on here?
582
00:30:26,574 --> 00:30:28,952
I don't know enough of
this is so confusing
583
00:30:28,952 --> 00:30:31,955
that it's kind of hard to know
where all this even begins.
584
00:30:32,580 --> 00:30:36,543
You know, like CRT,
especially a year or two ago.
585
00:30:36,543 --> 00:30:39,546
I would see yard signs
where people say no CRT.
586
00:30:39,712 --> 00:30:41,714
And I was never quite sure when
587
00:30:43,007 --> 00:30:46,052
in mainstream popular conversations
when terms are used like that,
588
00:30:46,970 --> 00:30:49,264
I'm not exactly sure what it does
589
00:30:49,264 --> 00:30:52,350
or does not have to do with the way
the term is used academically.
590
00:30:52,976 --> 00:30:55,061
I haven't sorted that out.
591
00:30:55,061 --> 00:30:56,604
Well, I mean, yeah, because now.
592
00:30:56,604 --> 00:30:59,065
And another one that's really it.
593
00:30:59,065 --> 00:31:00,984
At least that again,
this is my own personal experience
594
00:31:00,984 --> 00:31:03,987
that I'm seeing hit the mainstream
a lot more
595
00:31:04,571 --> 00:31:06,406
and is becoming more derogatory is DEI.
596
00:31:06,406 --> 00:31:10,451
Like I remember not that long ago
that was just kind of whatever
597
00:31:10,577 --> 00:31:14,956
wasn't necessarily used derogatorily,
but now it feels like
598
00:31:14,956 --> 00:31:17,417
I'm seeing that a lot more.
Oh, that's DEI.
599
00:31:17,417 --> 00:31:21,671
So diversity, equity and inclusion,
what those letters stand for
600
00:31:21,754 --> 00:31:23,798
and now is being used as like
this is really negative thing.
601
00:31:23,798 --> 00:31:27,552
And it's suddenly it feels like
the conversation is getting very confusing
602
00:31:27,552 --> 00:31:30,555
because it's that term is being thrown
around for so many different things.
603
00:31:30,763 --> 00:31:32,807
It's like, whoa, I'm
not really sure what we're talking about.
604
00:31:32,807 --> 00:31:34,392
Well, I mean, it was in
one of the comments here,
605
00:31:34,392 --> 00:31:38,354
someone's claiming, oh, this is a Marxist,
DEI categories that are being used.
606
00:31:38,438 --> 00:31:42,108
I'm like, okay, I'm
not quite sure what they're talking about
607
00:31:42,108 --> 00:31:44,861
because I don't even know
what those letters mean anymore.
608
00:31:46,237 --> 00:31:48,072
That's
just a, I guess, more of a present day
609
00:31:48,072 --> 00:31:51,618
thing that I've noticed, and I'm not quite
sure what to do with that actually.
610
00:31:51,951 --> 00:31:55,121
So yeah, diversity, equity and inclusion,
that was definitely
611
00:31:55,121 --> 00:31:56,080
something was embraced.
612
00:31:56,080 --> 00:31:58,666
That was a name of a, you know,
613
00:31:58,666 --> 00:32:01,169
universities have an office with that name
614
00:32:01,169 --> 00:32:04,172
and that kind of thing.
615
00:32:05,173 --> 00:32:06,382
So as a Christian
616
00:32:06,382 --> 00:32:10,887
with a Christian sexual ethic
and a Christian,
617
00:32:12,555 --> 00:32:15,058
sense of,
618
00:32:15,058 --> 00:32:19,228
you know, our biological sex
is something that God gives to us. And,
619
00:32:20,563 --> 00:32:22,273
you know, we need to make peace with that.
620
00:32:22,273 --> 00:32:26,235
And of course, acknowledging
all complexities that can go with,
621
00:32:27,028 --> 00:32:30,031
with, gender identity and so on. But
622
00:32:30,823 --> 00:32:33,826
we need to make peace with God created
us, male and female.
623
00:32:35,203 --> 00:32:35,536
Yeah.
624
00:32:35,536 --> 00:32:39,040
There were things in there
under diversity, equity and inclusion that
625
00:32:40,750 --> 00:32:42,043
are not good.
626
00:32:42,043 --> 00:32:44,462
And specifically,
627
00:32:44,462 --> 00:32:47,465
you know, a promotion of,
628
00:32:47,882 --> 00:32:50,593
you know, same sex relationships
629
00:32:50,593 --> 00:32:53,596
as good.
630
00:32:53,763 --> 00:32:55,390
You know, pushes
631
00:32:55,390 --> 00:32:58,393
to get people
to put your pronouns in your email.
632
00:32:59,102 --> 00:32:59,477
Yeah.
633
00:32:59,477 --> 00:33:02,897
You know, the sign of,
you know, freely adopting pronouns.
634
00:33:02,897 --> 00:33:04,816
And so on.
635
00:33:04,816 --> 00:33:07,443
And no, I didn't find those helpful.
636
00:33:07,443 --> 00:33:07,610
You know,
637
00:33:07,610 --> 00:33:11,114
fortunately context where I were
that was not something that was enforced.
638
00:33:11,114 --> 00:33:14,075
So nobody was coming after me and saying,
hey, you need to add the pronouns.
639
00:33:14,075 --> 00:33:18,162
I mean, there were, you know, an email
might at the beginning of the semester
640
00:33:18,162 --> 00:33:21,874
or whatever might encourage it,
but it's not like anybody was policing it.
641
00:33:22,333 --> 00:33:25,336
that part under DEI
642
00:33:26,546 --> 00:33:29,841
was definitely pushing against things
that are against
643
00:33:31,384 --> 00:33:33,803
the Christian understanding of
644
00:33:33,803 --> 00:33:34,804
how God made people.
645
00:33:36,097 --> 00:33:39,100
That is very true.
646
00:33:40,018 --> 00:33:41,644
But what I'm feeling
647
00:33:41,644 --> 00:33:44,689
where I started to see the DEI,
where I started picking up on it
648
00:33:44,689 --> 00:33:47,859
as a negative term, it was the implication
649
00:33:47,859 --> 00:33:50,862
that, oh.
650
00:33:51,904 --> 00:33:54,032
You're hiring people
just because you need to meet a quota.
651
00:33:54,032 --> 00:33:57,118
You're hiring people that aren't qualified
because you need to meet a quota of,
652
00:33:58,578 --> 00:34:00,371
a certain percentage of women or a certain
653
00:34:00,371 --> 00:34:03,374
percentage based on
654
00:34:03,374 --> 00:34:06,044
race or ethnicity or whatever.
655
00:34:06,044 --> 00:34:10,298
And, you know, the accusation was,
you know,
656
00:34:10,298 --> 00:34:13,301
this is distorting all kinds of stuff
because hiring is happening
657
00:34:14,927 --> 00:34:17,972
based on representation and not on
658
00:34:19,682 --> 00:34:22,685
qualifications or something like that.
659
00:34:22,894 --> 00:34:25,813
So in some ways that was a continuation,
or maybe an intensification
660
00:34:25,813 --> 00:34:30,485
of the whole fight over affirmative action
that goes back,
661
00:34:30,485 --> 00:34:34,655
you know, much further in this country,
like it's been debated in a lot of ways.
662
00:34:35,990 --> 00:34:36,491
So these
663
00:34:36,491 --> 00:34:39,452
are some of the criticisms
that people have leveled.
664
00:34:39,535 --> 00:34:42,872
And and to be fair
it's not just an enormous amount
665
00:34:42,872 --> 00:34:45,708
of these comments that we get,
but it was enough that hey let's,
666
00:34:45,708 --> 00:34:47,835
let's talk about it on this podcast.
667
00:34:47,835 --> 00:34:50,546
Yes. And I jump in on that, you know,
668
00:34:50,546 --> 00:34:53,549
those episodes.
669
00:34:54,008 --> 00:34:56,385
The amount of people
who just found those very helpful
670
00:34:56,385 --> 00:35:00,181
in processing it, you know, even like,
you know, the trauma informed churches.
671
00:35:01,057 --> 00:35:04,685
So I saw people saying, oh, this is using
wrong categories and it's not helpful.
672
00:35:06,145 --> 00:35:09,148
But I was also very keenly aware of,
673
00:35:10,525 --> 00:35:13,528
you know, a brother who
674
00:35:13,653 --> 00:35:16,656
had a difficult journey in life and
675
00:35:16,906 --> 00:35:20,493
also did his part
to make the journey difficult and so on.
676
00:35:20,493 --> 00:35:24,330
And, you know, somebody,
somebody who's really growing in the Lord.
677
00:35:25,748 --> 00:35:28,751
Clear testimony,
678
00:35:29,794 --> 00:35:31,796
everything.
679
00:35:31,796 --> 00:35:34,799
And, you know, he makes the comments like,
680
00:35:34,882 --> 00:35:38,761
okay, this describes
what my life is like, like
681
00:35:38,761 --> 00:35:42,140
you should listen to this
so that you know what it's like for me.
682
00:35:42,140 --> 00:35:45,143
And so, okay,
683
00:35:45,184 --> 00:35:47,854
like this is credibility
because I know that this is a person
684
00:35:47,854 --> 00:35:52,150
whose life has been turned around
and is growing in the Lord,
685
00:35:52,150 --> 00:35:55,111
and he's saying,
yeah, this is enormously helpful.
686
00:35:56,654 --> 00:35:56,904
Yeah.
687
00:35:56,904 --> 00:36:00,533
I think that is important context
because it seems like
688
00:36:01,200 --> 00:36:03,286
back to something I've said before.
689
00:36:03,286 --> 00:36:06,956
You know these terms are thrown around
so much it's kind of hard to know
690
00:36:06,956 --> 00:36:08,374
if they mean much anymore.
691
00:36:08,374 --> 00:36:11,460
And these we're talking about episodes,
you know, one on education.
692
00:36:11,460 --> 00:36:14,088
You know that's a very politically charged
right now.
693
00:36:14,088 --> 00:36:15,965
You know, trauma informed churches
694
00:36:15,965 --> 00:36:20,803
the one on, indigenous lands
in Pennsylvania becoming Mennonite farms.
695
00:36:20,803 --> 00:36:24,891
But, all of these things,
about wouldn't matter what you said,
696
00:36:25,099 --> 00:36:26,601
someone's probably going to label it,
697
00:36:26,601 --> 00:36:28,769
put one of these labels
on it just because those are
698
00:36:29,896 --> 00:36:31,814
lightning rods for these types of things.
699
00:36:31,814 --> 00:36:34,817
And that's a good point
you raised, because the,
700
00:36:35,359 --> 00:36:38,362
the one here that had the comment
this is Marxist DEI categories.
701
00:36:38,446 --> 00:36:41,282
The person says, you know,
it was also the one episode I,
702
00:36:41,282 --> 00:36:43,993
I at least personally had more people
reach out to me and say,
703
00:36:43,993 --> 00:36:47,705
that was so helpful than I think
anything we've published,
704
00:36:48,247 --> 00:36:49,790
which was really encouraging to me
to be like,
705
00:36:49,790 --> 00:36:51,709
okay,
we got maybe a few comments like that,
706
00:36:51,709 --> 00:36:54,712
but it was helpful to a lot of people,
and that's encouraging.
707
00:36:54,879 --> 00:36:57,298
And I got similar comments
on that episode.
708
00:36:57,298 --> 00:36:58,466
Yeah, exactly. Yeah.
709
00:36:58,466 --> 00:37:00,134
And so
710
00:37:00,134 --> 00:37:04,805
So as we think about these buzzwords
that we've been using in this episode
711
00:37:04,805 --> 00:37:08,017
so far, what are ways,
712
00:37:08,226 --> 00:37:11,395
or maybe examples,
you all could give of how
713
00:37:11,979 --> 00:37:16,108
we as followers of Christ can engage
well, respond
714
00:37:16,108 --> 00:37:21,405
well to these types of conversations
or in some cases, perhaps accusations.
715
00:37:23,741 --> 00:37:25,618
How do we walk this?
716
00:37:25,618 --> 00:37:28,788
So this is not about the accusations.
717
00:37:29,330 --> 00:37:31,540
But it's about some of these issues.
718
00:37:31,540 --> 00:37:34,543
So like I mentioned that one of the,
719
00:37:35,169 --> 00:37:38,965
one of the things that gets labeled
woke is when you have one,
720
00:37:38,965 --> 00:37:41,968
it seems like there's the sense of guilt
or responsibility for,
721
00:37:43,135 --> 00:37:46,097
you know, things your predecessors did
722
00:37:46,555 --> 00:37:48,975
a number of years ago or whatever.
723
00:37:48,975 --> 00:37:51,978
But, you know,
we do have to reckon with the past,
724
00:37:52,353 --> 00:37:53,521
in some way.
725
00:37:53,521 --> 00:37:56,607
And so the one example that I came
across recently,
726
00:37:57,483 --> 00:38:01,362
came from a Lutheran church,
727
00:38:01,946 --> 00:38:05,157
the Lutheran World Federation,
728
00:38:07,285 --> 00:38:10,288
And, you know,
for a little bit of context,
729
00:38:11,747 --> 00:38:14,750
you know, Lutherans and Anabaptists,
730
00:38:14,834 --> 00:38:17,795
emerged in Europe at the same time.
731
00:38:18,587 --> 00:38:21,590
Luther was not particularly
fond of Anabaptists.
732
00:38:21,716 --> 00:38:25,011
There were a lot of
things that happened there.
733
00:38:26,470 --> 00:38:28,097
Carry that forward.
734
00:38:28,097 --> 00:38:28,764
Right.
735
00:38:28,764 --> 00:38:31,600
We still have Lutherans and Anabaptists.
736
00:38:31,600 --> 00:38:35,146
And so in the early 2000s,
737
00:38:36,272 --> 00:38:39,275
there was a Lutheran group
and a Mennonite group
738
00:38:39,317 --> 00:38:42,320
that worked through that history together
and produced a joint,
739
00:38:42,528 --> 00:38:45,531
a joint description of the history, like,
740
00:38:45,531 --> 00:38:49,493
let's, let's state this in a way
that we can both say,
741
00:38:49,493 --> 00:38:52,496
yeah, this is an accurate description
of what happened.
742
00:38:52,913 --> 00:38:55,875
And then out of that,
743
00:38:55,875 --> 00:38:59,420
the Lutheran World Federation,
so representing a number of Lutheran
744
00:38:59,420 --> 00:39:04,342
churches, ended up,
you know, writing and adopting a statement
745
00:39:04,675 --> 00:39:07,678
and that was presented,
which was a kind of statement of
746
00:39:08,596 --> 00:39:10,723
repentance.
747
00:39:10,723 --> 00:39:13,726
And, you know, for me, as an Anabaptist.
748
00:39:13,976 --> 00:39:15,394
Well, I didn't know about this.
749
00:39:15,394 --> 00:39:19,940
I wasn't involved, you know,
with the groups that were in dialog, but.
750
00:39:22,985 --> 00:39:24,904
I do find it meaningful.
751
00:39:24,904 --> 00:39:28,199
So I'd like to read that statement
if I could, and a little bit,
752
00:39:28,866 --> 00:39:31,869
from the Mennonite response
or part of the statement.
753
00:39:32,328 --> 00:39:35,122
So it was titled action on the Legacy
754
00:39:35,122 --> 00:39:38,125
of Lutheran Persecution of Anabaptists,
755
00:39:38,709 --> 00:39:43,005
and begins when Lutherans today
realize the history of Lutheran Anabaptist
756
00:39:43,005 --> 00:39:48,302
relationships in the 16th century
and beyond, as it is presented
757
00:39:48,302 --> 00:39:51,305
in the report of the Lutheran Mennonite
International Study Commission.
758
00:39:52,348 --> 00:39:55,434
They are filled
with a deep sense of regret and pain
759
00:39:55,434 --> 00:39:58,437
over the persecution of Anabaptists
by Lutheran authorities,
760
00:39:58,854 --> 00:40:01,857
and especially over the fact
that the Lutheran reformers
761
00:40:02,316 --> 00:40:05,319
theologically supported this persecution.
762
00:40:06,695 --> 00:40:09,698
Thus, the Lutheran World Federation,
763
00:40:09,698 --> 00:40:11,617
a communion of churches, wishes to express
764
00:40:11,617 --> 00:40:14,620
publicly its deep regret and sorrow,
765
00:40:14,745 --> 00:40:18,165
trusting in God, who in Jesus Christ
was reconciling the world to himself,
766
00:40:18,165 --> 00:40:20,209
we asked for forgiveness from God
767
00:40:20,209 --> 00:40:22,461
and from our Mennonite sisters
and brothers for the harm
768
00:40:22,461 --> 00:40:25,464
that our forebears in the 16th century
committed to an Anabaptists
769
00:40:25,965 --> 00:40:29,301
for forgetting or ignoring this
persecution in the intervening centuries,
770
00:40:30,594 --> 00:40:32,596
and for all inappropriate, misleading
771
00:40:32,596 --> 00:40:36,100
and hurtful portraits of Anabaptists
and Mennonites made by Lutheran authors
772
00:40:36,600 --> 00:40:39,603
in both popular
and scholarly forms to the present day,
773
00:40:40,813 --> 00:40:42,940
we pray that
God may grant to our communities
774
00:40:42,940 --> 00:40:45,943
a healing of our memories
and reconciliation.
775
00:40:46,610 --> 00:40:49,155
And it goes on with some commitments.
776
00:40:49,155 --> 00:40:51,699
As I think about it,
777
00:40:51,699 --> 00:40:54,034
they acknowledge things they said
778
00:40:54,034 --> 00:40:56,370
this was wrong.
779
00:40:56,370 --> 00:40:57,079
We regret it.
780
00:40:57,079 --> 00:41:00,875
We're saying something to people
who are descendants of these Anabaptists.
781
00:41:03,043 --> 00:41:04,795
We want a healing of our memories
782
00:41:04,795 --> 00:41:07,798
and reconciliation.
783
00:41:08,215 --> 00:41:11,218
I find that meaningful.
784
00:41:12,178 --> 00:41:15,431
That strikes me as the kind of thing
that could easily be labeled as woke.
785
00:41:15,431 --> 00:41:18,767
Because, you know,
why are they apologizing for what somebody
786
00:41:18,767 --> 00:41:21,770
did 400 years ago and
787
00:41:21,770 --> 00:41:25,524
are they dishonoring
their past and all of that?
788
00:41:26,525 --> 00:41:27,109
And I don't see
789
00:41:27,109 --> 00:41:30,070
it that I see it as a straightforward
acknowledgment
790
00:41:30,821 --> 00:41:33,282
and, you know,
791
00:41:33,282 --> 00:41:36,285
they didn't say, well,
we can't call ourselves Lutherans anymore.
792
00:41:37,161 --> 00:41:40,039
And the statement goes on to mention,
you know, there are remaining
793
00:41:40,039 --> 00:41:41,665
significant differences between men.
794
00:41:41,665 --> 00:41:44,668
There are remaining, you know,
significant disagreements and so on.
795
00:41:45,252 --> 00:41:48,255
But yeah, I found it
796
00:41:48,339 --> 00:41:49,215
deeply meaningful.
797
00:41:49,215 --> 00:41:52,301
And I think it's just a good example of it
798
00:41:52,301 --> 00:41:55,304
dealing with that.
799
00:41:55,554 --> 00:41:58,557
And then just a little bit,
Mennonite World Conference,
800
00:41:59,767 --> 00:42:03,103
you know, presented a letter in response
801
00:42:03,562 --> 00:42:06,148
and just a couple snippets from that,
802
00:42:06,148 --> 00:42:09,151
Are we worthy to receive your request?
803
00:42:09,568 --> 00:42:12,154
We are painfully aware
of our own inadequacy.
804
00:42:12,154 --> 00:42:15,241
We cannot bring ourselves to this table
with held heads held high.
805
00:42:15,783 --> 00:42:18,953
We could only come bowed down in great
humility and in the fear of the Lord.
806
00:42:20,162 --> 00:42:23,040
We cannot come to this point and fail
to see our own sinfulness.
807
00:42:23,040 --> 00:42:24,542
We can't come to this point
without recognize
808
00:42:24,542 --> 00:42:27,545
our own need
for God's grace and forgiveness.
809
00:42:27,545 --> 00:42:30,548
And they go on to some specific responses.
810
00:42:30,631 --> 00:42:32,800
And then a commitment,
811
00:42:32,800 --> 00:42:35,970
that is striking and a commitment that,
812
00:42:37,930 --> 00:42:40,224
I want to adopt personally,
813
00:42:40,224 --> 00:42:44,228
and I hope it's the way, you know,
Anabaptist perspectives functions.
814
00:42:45,396 --> 00:42:47,940
That Mennonite letter said,
we commit ourselves
815
00:42:47,940 --> 00:42:51,485
to take care that your initiative
for reconciliation is known and honored
816
00:42:52,027 --> 00:42:55,030
in Anabaptist Mennonite
teaching about Lutherans.
817
00:42:55,990 --> 00:42:58,993
Because it's to me, it is profoundly.
818
00:42:59,702 --> 00:43:02,079
Yeah. The apology has an effect.
819
00:43:02,079 --> 00:43:04,582
It produces an obligation in me.
820
00:43:04,582 --> 00:43:08,711
You know, we talk about Luther
and outrageous things.
821
00:43:08,711 --> 00:43:10,588
He said.
822
00:43:10,588 --> 00:43:13,632
And yes, we have remaining
823
00:43:14,216 --> 00:43:17,428
theological differences with Lutherans,
but the fact that a statement
824
00:43:17,428 --> 00:43:18,345
like this was made.
825
00:43:19,805 --> 00:43:21,390
It actually
826
00:43:21,390 --> 00:43:24,393
not only is it healing, it
creates a sense of responsibility like,
827
00:43:24,852 --> 00:43:26,645
oh, we can't go around talking about,
828
00:43:26,645 --> 00:43:29,648
oh, those Lutherans,
they persecuted us without
829
00:43:29,732 --> 00:43:33,527
knowing and honoring, like,
you know, the Lutheran World Federation,
830
00:43:33,527 --> 00:43:38,699
representing a large group of Lutherans
has said, yeah, like that was wrong.
831
00:43:38,699 --> 00:43:40,951
And we're sorry about that.
832
00:43:40,951 --> 00:43:43,579
And that creates an obligation for us.
833
00:43:43,579 --> 00:43:47,291
So I bring this in here because, you know,
I fear that.
834
00:43:48,542 --> 00:43:49,877
anti-woke ism.
835
00:43:49,877 --> 00:43:53,547
If we can once again
make something general,
836
00:43:54,965 --> 00:43:56,925
it's going to
837
00:43:56,925 --> 00:43:59,803
I fear that that attitude, you know,
labeling things woke and labeling
838
00:43:59,803 --> 00:44:02,806
this kind of consciousness,
awareness of these things as woke
839
00:44:03,807 --> 00:44:06,935
is just going to make it harder
to do these kinds of,
840
00:44:08,395 --> 00:44:09,813
I think, yeah, important
841
00:44:10,939 --> 00:44:13,942
reconciling work.
842
00:44:14,026 --> 00:44:17,112
So, Jaran, as we think of ways
843
00:44:17,112 --> 00:44:20,282
to respond to these types of things
as Christians.
844
00:44:20,699 --> 00:44:21,575
Yeah.
845
00:44:21,575 --> 00:44:25,329
What would you like to add on on this
or examples you would like to give?
846
00:44:25,412 --> 00:44:30,584
Well, first, I think that the exchange
that Marlin read to us is very beautiful.
847
00:44:30,584 --> 00:44:34,421
And I really appreciate the exhortation.
848
00:44:34,922 --> 00:44:37,716
To not being intimidated
849
00:44:37,716 --> 00:44:42,012
by the labels that may be put upon us
when there's a genuine opportunity
850
00:44:42,012 --> 00:44:45,057
for reconciliation, truth
and acknowledgment
851
00:44:45,140 --> 00:44:48,811
such as happened in the conversation
between the Lutherans and the Mennonites.
852
00:44:50,104 --> 00:44:52,981
I think that
and I already alluded to this,
853
00:44:52,981 --> 00:44:55,984
but I do think that those labels can
854
00:44:56,193 --> 00:44:58,862
drive us towards,
855
00:44:58,862 --> 00:45:02,032
you know, a political or tribal
consciousness
856
00:45:02,825 --> 00:45:05,035
that the gospel doesn't have place for.
857
00:45:06,286 --> 00:45:08,038
So that's my addition would
858
00:45:08,038 --> 00:45:11,583
addition would be let's let's avoid
859
00:45:12,042 --> 00:45:14,920
the tribal identities,
860
00:45:14,920 --> 00:45:18,424
the partizanship,
and let's follow the way of Jesus.
861
00:45:19,007 --> 00:45:22,970
And what that calls us to,
which in many cases is,
862
00:45:24,471 --> 00:45:27,433
charity, reconciliation
863
00:45:27,433 --> 00:45:30,394
and forgiveness.
864
00:45:30,894 --> 00:45:33,856
So we've covered a lot of
865
00:45:33,856 --> 00:45:35,441
pieces in this podcast
866
00:45:35,441 --> 00:45:38,610
and I'm curious
to hear people's feedback on this.
867
00:45:38,610 --> 00:45:40,654
But as we
868
00:45:40,654 --> 00:45:44,408
wrap this kind of complicated,
a bit messy,
869
00:45:44,658 --> 00:45:48,495
perhaps confusing topic
and bring it down to earth,
870
00:45:48,662 --> 00:45:52,374
is there any thing you would like to say
in closing for this episode?
871
00:45:52,416 --> 00:45:54,585
Either of you?
872
00:45:54,585 --> 00:45:57,588
I think it's really important that
873
00:45:58,505 --> 00:46:00,632
we're not intimidated by labels.
874
00:46:00,632 --> 00:46:03,343
And just to recognize
875
00:46:03,343 --> 00:46:06,346
we may get labels for various things.
876
00:46:06,555 --> 00:46:07,681
You know, let's be discreet.
877
00:46:07,681 --> 00:46:10,684
Let's not be.
878
00:46:11,143 --> 00:46:14,438
Let's not be provocative
purely for the sake of being provocative.
879
00:46:15,773 --> 00:46:17,775
Maybe let's not be provocative unless,
880
00:46:17,775 --> 00:46:20,527
you know, we need to get somebody to think
about a particular point.
881
00:46:20,527 --> 00:46:24,448
But we’ew going to get labeled,
and we need to be aware of that.
882
00:46:25,532 --> 00:46:27,618
And we may get labeled from,
883
00:46:27,618 --> 00:46:30,412
you know, left or right or top
884
00:46:30,412 --> 00:46:34,833
or bottom or whatever
the political categories are. And,
885
00:46:36,794 --> 00:46:39,755
you know, we can't hide from that.
886
00:46:39,880 --> 00:46:43,884
So we may get labeled as
887
00:46:45,302 --> 00:46:46,678
homophobic.
888
00:46:46,678 --> 00:46:49,681
And if we're labeled as homophobic,
889
00:46:49,681 --> 00:46:52,684
simply because we have
890
00:46:53,727 --> 00:46:55,687
stood for,
891
00:46:55,687 --> 00:46:59,483
you know, sexuality within marriage
as one man and one woman.
892
00:47:00,734 --> 00:47:04,238
Then we can't be
can't be scared of that label.
893
00:47:05,280 --> 00:47:07,783
Similarly, if it's simply
894
00:47:07,783 --> 00:47:10,786
because of speaking about,
895
00:47:11,411 --> 00:47:14,414
you know, God's gift of sexuality and,
896
00:47:15,249 --> 00:47:18,585
you know, embracing
and embracing our biological sex.
897
00:47:19,795 --> 00:47:22,506
And it's not done in,
898
00:47:22,506 --> 00:47:26,134
you know, insensitive or unhelpful ways,
but it's, you know,
899
00:47:26,134 --> 00:47:29,304
if we're labeled that for standing up
for Scripture, we need to accept that.
900
00:47:30,472 --> 00:47:33,517
And in the same way.
901
00:47:36,311 --> 00:47:39,398
If we're labeled as woke for.
902
00:47:41,650 --> 00:47:45,487
You know how we talk about wrongs done by
903
00:47:46,655 --> 00:47:48,824
the United States government
904
00:47:48,824 --> 00:47:52,828
or how we tell history,
not just from the winners perspective,
905
00:47:52,828 --> 00:47:56,123
but from the losers perspective,
so to speak.
906
00:47:59,626 --> 00:48:01,295
You know, for labeled as woke for that.
907
00:48:01,295 --> 00:48:03,797
I think we need to accept that, like,
this work we need to do.
908
00:48:03,797 --> 00:48:06,800
And, you know, I think about it
909
00:48:06,800 --> 00:48:09,303
in our relation education curriculum,
910
00:48:09,303 --> 00:48:12,306
how do we talk about things,
how do we tell the stories of history?
911
00:48:13,307 --> 00:48:15,976
And I I think if we tell them
honestly and in ways that
912
00:48:17,060 --> 00:48:20,063
honor God's kingdom.
913
00:48:20,188 --> 00:48:21,273
Yeah,
914
00:48:21,273 --> 00:48:24,276
I think we're going to get caught
in the anti-woke waves.
915
00:48:24,484 --> 00:48:27,779
And I think we have to accept that
not by provoking it,
916
00:48:27,779 --> 00:48:30,782
but we can't be scared of that.
917
00:48:32,951 --> 00:48:34,912
There's a lot to think about
in this episode.
918
00:48:34,912 --> 00:48:35,996
Yeah.
919
00:48:35,996 --> 00:48:39,458
Just thank you, both of you, for being
willing to come on and engage with these
920
00:48:40,167 --> 00:48:44,546
questions that we've or comments
that we've received from listeners.
921
00:48:44,546 --> 00:48:46,173
And I encourage people listening to this.
922
00:48:46,173 --> 00:48:50,218
If you have thoughts, feel free
to leave us a comment or, contact us.
923
00:48:50,552 --> 00:48:53,555
But I think you've ended us
with an important piece there Marlin.
924
00:48:54,097 --> 00:48:56,725
Follow what Scripture teaches.
925
00:48:56,725 --> 00:48:59,937
Follow Christ,
and don't worry about the labels too much.
926
00:49:00,145 --> 00:49:02,689
I think that's some pretty important
advice, too.
927
00:49:02,689 --> 00:49:05,859
And,
and and leave with our, our listeners.
928
00:49:05,859 --> 00:49:07,027
So thank you both for sharing.
929
00:49:08,320 --> 00:49:08,737
Thanks
930
00:49:08,737 --> 00:49:11,782
for listening to this episode
of Anabaptist Perspectives.
931
00:49:11,823 --> 00:49:12,950
If you found this interesting,
932
00:49:12,950 --> 00:49:15,953
you may want to check out the episode
we did with Ruth Anna Kuhnz.
933
00:49:15,953 --> 00:49:18,789
We referred to it
several times throughout this episode,
934
00:49:18,789 --> 00:49:21,917
and you can find that linked
in the description down below.
935
00:49:22,209 --> 00:49:24,920
Thanks again for watching,
and we'll catch you in the next episode.