1 00:00:00,000 --> 00:00:10,800 Are you tired of feeling like your lessons or instructions fall flat? 2 00:00:10,800 --> 00:00:18,800 What if the secret to truly impactful teaching lies not in what you know, but how you share it? 3 00:00:18,800 --> 00:00:27,360 Hello listeners, welcome to the Science of Self on July 2, 2025, where you improve your lives from the inside out. 4 00:00:27,360 --> 00:00:41,200 Today's featured book is How to Teach Anything, Breakdown Complex Topics and Explain with Clarity while Keeping Engagement and Motivation by, of course, Peter Hollins. 5 00:00:41,200 --> 00:00:44,600 This is in the Learning How to Learn book series. 6 00:00:44,600 --> 00:00:47,520 Now, don't let that scare you off if you're not a teacher. 7 00:00:47,520 --> 00:00:49,600 You teach more than you realize. 8 00:00:49,600 --> 00:00:58,680 If you deal with people in almost any aspect, you're doing some form of teaching and there's some good information in this episode that you can apply. 9 00:00:58,680 --> 00:01:06,320 This episode specifically pulls chapter one from the book, Lessons from the Science of Pedagogy. 10 00:01:06,320 --> 00:01:07,840 What is pedagogy? 11 00:01:07,840 --> 00:01:08,400 You might ask. 12 00:01:08,400 --> 00:01:18,280 Pedagogy is the method and practice of teaching, especially as an academic subject or theoretical concept. 13 00:01:18,280 --> 00:01:24,280 To get into the topic, Peter Hollins starts off with the five key pedagogical approaches. 14 00:01:24,280 --> 00:01:28,880 These are just frameworks for how you approach teaching or instructing. 15 00:01:28,880 --> 00:01:39,920 He lists five, the constructive, fist approach, the integrative approach, collaborative, inquiry-based, and the reflective approach. 16 00:01:39,920 --> 00:01:47,440 Effectively, using these approaches, of course, depends on the brain's strengths and limitations, and that's the next section in this chapter. 17 00:01:47,440 --> 00:01:53,680 And we present some strategies for keeping your material focused on particular topics. 18 00:01:53,680 --> 00:02:00,480 Making information as much as you can, and appealing to the senses in ways that pique attention. 19 00:02:00,480 --> 00:02:05,560 If you incorporate those, your communication will be much stronger. 20 00:02:05,560 --> 00:02:11,320 We look into the concept of scaffolding the power of baby steps. 21 00:02:11,320 --> 00:02:20,480 Scaffolding is the principle of making small improvements and building big concepts or skills from smaller, simpler ones. 22 00:02:20,480 --> 00:02:27,520 It's the process where the teacher will gradually hand over control and mastery to the student. 23 00:02:27,520 --> 00:02:29,280 We appreciate you joining us today. 24 00:02:29,280 --> 00:02:35,080 Make sure to check out the takeaways at the end if you want a quick summary of the episode. 25 00:02:35,080 --> 00:02:51,120 And once again, this is chapter one, Lessons from the Science of Pedagogy from Peter Hollins' book, How to Teach Anything, Breakdown Complex Topics and Explain with Clarity, While Keeping Engagement and Motivation. 26 00:02:51,120 --> 00:02:52,280 Thanks for joining us. 27 00:02:52,280 --> 00:02:58,160 Here's the audio chapter. 28 00:02:58,160 --> 00:03:03,680 Imagine you are with a friend who has asked you to show them how to do something that you’re an expert in. 29 00:03:03,680 --> 00:03:06,040 They know nothing and need to be taught. 30 00:03:06,040 --> 00:03:08,400 How do you go about doing this? 31 00:03:08,400 --> 00:03:24,000 Most of us are more familiar with being in the shoes of the student and not the teacher, and when we’re put on the spot like this, we’re confronted with an interesting perspective: seeing knowledge from the perspective of the one who has to communicate it to someone else. 32 00:03:24,000 --> 00:03:30,120 You probably had a few favorite teachers in school or university, but what exactly made them so effective? 33 00:03:30,120 --> 00:03:40,280 If you consider yourself a lifelong student and autodidact, you probably know that your theoretical approach, your attitude and your methods make all the difference. 34 00:03:40,280 --> 00:03:45,720 In this book we’ll be looking at learning, but through the less common perspective of a teacher. 35 00:03:45,720 --> 00:04:02,240 But rather than focusing on the philosophy of education in general or on school curricula, we’ll be exploring the most fundamental underpinnings of what makes an excellent teacher, whether it’s formally in the classroom or simply when helping out a friend. 36 00:04:02,240 --> 00:04:14,120 The wonderful side effect is that mastering the role of an effective teacher has a way of making you a better learner, as you become familiar with learning and knowledge acquisition as a worthy subject in itself. 37 00:04:14,120 --> 00:04:19,800 We’ll start with the foundations of pedagogy, or the study of education and learning. 38 00:04:19,800 --> 00:04:30,880 But hopefully, by the end of this book, you’ll be able to use these general principles in creative ways that extend well beyond the standard teacher-student context. 39 00:04:30,880 --> 00:04:33,040 Five Key Pedagogical Approaches 40 00:04:33,040 --> 00:04:33,040 41 00:04:33,040 --> 00:04:42,320 Teaching is in essence a kind of conversation, where new information is communicated and conveyed to a person who doesn’t possess it. 42 00:04:42,320 --> 00:04:52,440 The approach you take depends on how you see the student, the teacher, the relationship between them, the information, and the rules governing the transfer of knowledge. 43 00:04:52,440 --> 00:04:58,240 To teach your friend what you know, you could start with what they already understand, then build from there. 44 00:04:58,240 --> 00:05:07,360 For example, you teach a basic principle first, or draw on their existing knowledge of concepts, to expand and introduce something new. 45 00:05:07,360 --> 00:05:12,520 You strengthen this new acquisition by engaging in problem-solving tasks. 46 00:05:12,520 --> 00:05:21,480 Your role as a teacher is basically to lay out a useful obstacle course for your student, who, in moving through it, learns new things. 47 00:05:21,480 --> 00:05:25,280 This is called a constructivist approach. 48 00:05:25,280 --> 00:05:33,040 This is a great way to teach complex ideas, and it works because it builds these major concepts up from smaller, simpler ones. 49 00:05:33,040 --> 00:05:36,720 The student masters these then moves on in a structured way. 50 00:05:36,720 --> 00:05:51,760 For example, students often learn an instrument in this manner—first master the scales, reading music and basic handling of the instrument before moving on to more and more complex combinations of those skills. 51 00:05:51,760 --> 00:06:02,080 If you’re teaching more than one person, say two friends together, utilize the constructivist approach by creating an environment of collaboration between the students. 52 00:06:02,080 --> 00:06:13,000 Instead of proceeding in a highly structured manner like some other methods, you use what they both know as the basis for how you go about relaying what you want to teach. 53 00:06:13,000 --> 00:06:21,840 Analogies are a particularly useful way to do this and allows students to “construct” an understanding of a new concept based on the old one. 54 00:06:21,840 --> 00:06:27,160 However, one drawback of this approach is that it can be unstructured. 55 00:06:27,160 --> 00:06:32,400 Some students struggle to make connections between different concepts and just don’t learn well that way. 56 00:06:32,400 --> 00:06:43,200 They require structure and would prefer to be told exactly how to think and understand something, rather than being expected to construct their own understanding of concepts. 57 00:06:43,200 --> 00:06:45,640 (McLeod 2019) 58 00:06:45,640 --> 00:06:46,840 59 00:06:46,840 --> 00:06:48,280 But you can take another approach. 60 00:06:48,280 --> 00:06:58,840 Did you ever sit in a classroom as a child, and wonder, “what’s the point of all this?” because you couldn’t understand how to apply the lesson to the “real world”? 61 00:06:58,840 --> 00:07:03,960 You wouldn’t have thought so if your teacher had used what’s called an integrative approach, i.e. 62 00:07:03,960 --> 00:07:09,440 teaching that embeds new knowledge in a practical, applied way. 63 00:07:09,440 --> 00:07:18,080 An example is a language teacher who has students role play certain encounters they’d likely have in a different country, like ordering food in a restaurant. 64 00:07:18,080 --> 00:07:25,160 This approach works because it takes dry, abstract knowledge and makes it come alive in context. 65 00:07:25,160 --> 00:07:33,440 A student is far more likely to be inspired and engaged with a lesson if they know what it all means, and how it functions practically in the world. 66 00:07:33,440 --> 00:07:42,240 This is probably why you’ve forgotten everything you learnt about trigonometry in high school—you never needed to apply those skills in everyday life! 67 00:07:42,240 --> 00:07:48,720 Of course, you can imagine that some kinds of knowledge lend themselves to an integrative approach more than others. 68 00:07:48,720 --> 00:07:59,120 On the other hand, your favorite schoolteachers were likely those that understood this principle and worked hard to make even “boring” subjects seem relevant, current and interesting. 69 00:07:59,120 --> 00:08:09,000 Staying with your memories of school, can you recall that teacher that would regularly say, “OK, now everyone get into groups of four”? 70 00:08:09,000 --> 00:08:16,080 Some students loathe groupwork, but there’s good reason to use the collaborative approach in the classroom and out of it. 71 00:08:16,080 --> 00:08:22,840 Collaboration is about using teamwork to share the process of learning in a group. 72 00:08:22,840 --> 00:08:28,960 Some educational researchers have found that learning is enhanced when people work on something together, and you can imagine why. 73 00:08:28,960 --> 00:08:43,960 Humans are social creatures, and the process of explaining, communicating, negotiating, clarifying and even arguing can bring a topic more sharply into focus than if you had merely sat down quietly on your own with it. 74 00:08:43,960 --> 00:08:49,800 With a collaborative approach, the teacher leverages other students to act as co-teachers. 75 00:08:49,800 --> 00:09:04,240 It’s almost a guarantee that every student in a group will have different strengths and skills, but this means that students can simultaneously help others in some respects, while being supported by other students in areas where they are weaker. 76 00:09:04,240 --> 00:09:11,120 A kind of self-correction happens in groups, where the whole seems greater than the sum of the parts. 77 00:09:11,120 --> 00:09:20,360 The teacher in this case can act as a member of the group, or be more of a detached facilitator who arranges the conditions under which the group operates. 78 00:09:20,360 --> 00:09:30,120 We can imagine this approach in a school where a science teacher asks small groups to work together on conducting an experiment and compiling a scientific report. 79 00:09:30,120 --> 00:09:42,040 This requires them to identify their respective skills and allocate different tasks accordingly, seeing the whole come together and (hopefully) drawing on one another’s skills and knowledge. 80 00:09:42,040 --> 00:09:49,520 But this approach works out of classrooms just as easily, and many people naturally take this approach when teaching. 81 00:09:49,520 --> 00:09:58,560 For example, a manager teaching new staff how to operate a machine may ask slightly more experienced staff to do the training while she supervises. 82 00:09:58,560 --> 00:10:05,360 This way the current staff get to reinforce their knowledge at the same time as they teach others. 83 00:10:05,360 --> 00:10:14,400 In a way, these more experienced staff members are closer to the new recruits than the manager, and remember what it was like not to know how to operate the machine. 84 00:10:14,400 --> 00:10:21,800 The manager can leverage this knowledge and “teach” mainly by facilitating a natural sharing process. 85 00:10:21,800 --> 00:10:29,400 Another highly effective pedagogical technique is the inquiry-based approach. 86 00:10:29,400 --> 00:10:35,440 As the name suggests, this method puts questions at the heart of the learning process. 87 00:10:35,440 --> 00:10:42,080 When you think about it, this is naturally how learning unfolds within us—we ask, What is this? 88 00:10:42,080 --> 00:10:44,080 How does it work? 89 00:10:44,080 --> 00:10:45,520 Why did XYZ happen? 90 00:10:45,520 --> 00:10:47,400 What will happen next? 91 00:10:47,400 --> 00:10:49,960 How can I get from A to B? 92 00:10:49,960 --> 00:10:57,360 The inquiry-based approach works with the question, the answer, and the part in between. 93 00:10:57,360 --> 00:11:05,520 For example, a “confirmation inquiry” lays out the question, its answer, and the method used to arrive at the answer. 94 00:11:05,520 --> 00:11:08,280 This confirms for students how it’s done. 95 00:11:08,280 --> 00:11:16,480 You could also pose a more “structured inquiry” and give the student a question and the method to answer it, but allow them to find the answer themselves. 96 00:11:16,480 --> 00:11:27,960 A “guided inquiry” is to simply offer a question, and the student is tasked with creating their own method for arriving at the solution, as well as the solution itself. 97 00:11:27,960 --> 00:11:37,120 Finally, you could offer nothing—no question, method, or answer, and let the student devise all three for themselves. 98 00:11:37,120 --> 00:11:44,720 This last approach is an “open inquiry” and fundamentally underpins such educational approaches as the Montessori method. 99 00:11:44,720 --> 00:11:51,360 Here, children of different ages are grouped together and allowed to pursue whatever it is that they want to learn. 100 00:11:51,360 --> 00:12:01,160 This leaves them to come up with their own questions pertaining to that interest, after which they devise methods to answer them too. 101 00:12:01,160 --> 00:12:11,080 Using questions this way spurs students to think through novel problems themselves, rather than a teacher simply handing inert information to them. 102 00:12:11,080 --> 00:12:23,760 You could say, “If we solved the old problem in such-and-such a way, how should we solve this new problem?” You are laying out a question and method, and nudging your student toward the right answer. 103 00:12:23,760 --> 00:12:32,280 On the other hand, you might hand a friend three books and ask them to devise a question they think best taps into the material contained in all three. 104 00:12:32,280 --> 00:12:40,280 This triggers them to not only seek solutions and new methods, but to even frame their own inquiries from the beginning. 105 00:12:40,280 --> 00:12:48,360 While this method has many benefits, such as its unique ability to foster curiosity, it comes with some drawbacks. 106 00:12:48,360 --> 00:12:53,680 For one, it can be very difficult for a teacher to prepare for an inquiry-based approach. 107 00:12:53,680 --> 00:13:00,920 Exhaustively teaching a concept through a series of questions and answers takes much more effort than other approaches. 108 00:13:00,920 --> 00:13:08,440 The method can also fall flat if your students can’t answer the questions you’ve prepared for them. 109 00:13:08,440 --> 00:13:16,880 In the worst case, it might even make them feel embarrassed and lower their confidence, especially if they have learning disabilities or aren’t quick thinkers. 110 00:13:16,880 --> 00:13:19,720 (Gutierrez 2018) 111 00:13:19,720 --> 00:13:21,440 112 00:13:21,440 --> 00:13:25,720 If you’re wondering whether these approaches can be blended, the answer is yes. 113 00:13:25,720 --> 00:13:34,280 The reflective approach, in fact, is one final pedagogical method that places regular reflection at the center of learning. 114 00:13:34,280 --> 00:13:43,520 Though all these approaches are valuable for different reasons, none will work if they’re applied unthinkingly to inappropriate situations. 115 00:13:43,520 --> 00:13:52,000 Under the reflexive approach, the teacher regularly stops and appraises the techniques being used, and adjusts accordingly. 116 00:13:52,000 --> 00:13:59,000 Is what you’re doing actually working for this student, and this topic, in this moment? 117 00:13:59,000 --> 00:14:00,440 Why or why not? 118 00:14:00,440 --> 00:14:01,320 What would work better? 119 00:14:01,320 --> 00:14:10,520 Trainee teachers are often encouraged to stay in reflective mode as they themselves learn what is effective and what isn’t, and why. 120 00:14:10,520 --> 00:14:18,040 This approach highlights an important principle: that teaching is practical—it’s about what works. 121 00:14:18,040 --> 00:14:24,680 There are no topics too difficult or students too stupid, only methods that are unsuitable. 122 00:14:24,680 --> 00:14:36,320 When you take on the reflective perspective, you remind yourself that teaching is just a tool, and that you can and should try different approaches to reach your ultimate goal. 123 00:14:36,320 --> 00:14:49,000 This promotes experimentation, but like the inquiry-based approach, it demands a lot of effort from the teacher to devise strategies for teaching approaches that are new to them. 124 00:14:49,000 --> 00:14:56,080 Everything in the chapters that follow refers back to one or more of these five pedagogical approaches, in one way or another. 125 00:14:56,080 --> 00:15:11,920 It’s worth remembering that although much of the available theory on teaching and learning is designed for conventional classrooms, these approaches and methods are universal, and your imagination is the only limit when it comes to where and how you apply them. 126 00:15:11,920 --> 00:15:16,160 The Brain’s Strengths and Limitations 127 00:15:16,160 --> 00:15:16,160 128 00:15:16,160 --> 00:15:18,680 The brain isn’t a machine. 129 00:15:18,680 --> 00:15:29,880 Though it sometimes acts a little like a computer processor, it’s not—it’s a biological entity with natural constraints on its ability to take on new information or focus. 130 00:15:29,880 --> 00:15:40,120 Many self-help guides that promise superhuman memory or ultra-productivity would have us believe that the brain can be whipped into shape if only we try hard enough. 131 00:15:40,120 --> 00:15:48,760 In fact, we are more likely to learn well—and teach well—if we work within our brain’s limits rather than push against them. 132 00:15:48,760 --> 00:15:51,200 We need to be strategic. 133 00:15:51,200 --> 00:16:03,440 The pedagogical approaches we’ve covered will only work when we allow our students (and ourselves) enough time, space, patience and adequate challenge to really learn. 134 00:16:03,440 --> 00:16:11,120 The most optimal path is the balanced one, with plenty of time to rest and integrate new material. 135 00:16:11,120 --> 00:16:26,160 So, whatever approach is taken and whatever it is that is being learnt, the volume and intensity of learning needs to match and respect the brain’s inbuilt capacities, and not exceed them—otherwise your teaching is all for nothing. 136 00:16:26,160 --> 00:16:32,960 Enter a model called the “cognitive load theory,” which is pretty much what it sounds like. 137 00:16:32,960 --> 00:16:39,480 In a nutshell, this theory reminds us that the brain can mostly only do one new thing at a time. 138 00:16:39,480 --> 00:16:44,080 Seeing this, we need to prioritize what that thing is. 139 00:16:44,080 --> 00:16:53,880 Psychologist John Sweller proposed the theory in 1998 to explain how the brain encounters, processes and stores new information. 140 00:16:53,880 --> 00:17:04,960 When learning something new, we use our working memory, but once the information is assimilated, we commit it to long-term memory in the form of mental schemas. 141 00:17:04,960 --> 00:17:23,440 When we learn something new, it takes a lot more cognitive energy than retrieving something already learnt and “banked.” This is cognitive load, and, just like your muscles have natural limits to the physical loads they can bear, your brain has limits to what it can mentally carry. 142 00:17:23,440 --> 00:17:33,520 Short-term memory, in other words, is a limited resource, and if we want to be the best learners or teachers we can, we need to work smart with what we have. 143 00:17:33,520 --> 00:17:40,040 One obvious way to enhance learning or teaching is to make efforts to reduce cognitive load. 144 00:17:40,040 --> 00:17:46,400 You want to get the most learning out of the least possible “spend” of cognitive energy. 145 00:17:46,400 --> 00:17:48,440 How can you do this? 146 00:17:48,440 --> 00:18:01,080 Well, if you want to move a massive pile of stones from here to there and you only have a small wheelbarrow, the method is obvious: you tackle it gradually, one small load at a time. 147 00:18:01,080 --> 00:18:06,200 This is like altering the content of what is learnt to make it easier to absorb. 148 00:18:06,200 --> 00:18:18,240 If you ask your student to break things down into chunks, to simplify, or to work with summaries, you are reducing cognitive load by altering the content the brain has to process. 149 00:18:18,240 --> 00:18:20,680 But there are other ways to lighten the load. 150 00:18:20,680 --> 00:18:27,400 You could focus on steps or stages in a sequence, rather than try to digest the whole all at once. 151 00:18:27,400 --> 00:18:31,840 This means we break things down temporally for students. 152 00:18:31,840 --> 00:18:35,080 First, just consider the beginning. 153 00:18:35,080 --> 00:18:40,320 Once that’s achieved, look at the next step, and so on, building as you go. 154 00:18:40,320 --> 00:18:50,920 A biology teacher could show you the working of a tiny element in an ecosystem, and keep zooming out, showing how every larger element connects to the others. 155 00:18:50,920 --> 00:19:01,120 The entire picture is too much to take in at once, but more manageable when told as a sequence or story with a beginning and an end. 156 00:19:01,120 --> 00:19:06,240 Put yourself in the shoes of someone trying to learn a new concept in chemistry. 157 00:19:06,240 --> 00:19:26,760 They might pick up a book on the topic and try to grasp it, but keep on encountering terms like “optical chirality” and “enantiomers.” They need to stop reading and go and look for definitions of these terms, but when they do, they realize there are even more terms they need to understand before they can comprehend those ones. 158 00:19:26,760 --> 00:19:28,480 Pretty overwhelming, right? 159 00:19:28,480 --> 00:19:40,280 The trouble here is that the person is attempting to work on two levels at once, juggling the use and application of certain concepts while also trying to properly understand those concepts. 160 00:19:40,280 --> 00:19:46,480 There is too much in working memory and not enough in long-term memory to draw on. 161 00:19:46,480 --> 00:19:48,240 What happens? 162 00:19:48,240 --> 00:19:52,680 The brain is overloaded and no new schemas can be built. 163 00:19:52,680 --> 00:20:10,800 If you’re the teacher, however, and you understand cognitive load theory, the idea is that you can deliberately create a learning environment that guides your student in such a way as to decrease their cognitive load, direct their focus, and help them build up useful schemas, step by step. 164 00:20:10,800 --> 00:20:31,520 In our example, a good teacher can say, “Look, you need to start with this concept first, then move on to this material, and then put it all together with this final piece, here.” The idea is to look at how the brain ordinarily learns new things, and recreate that deliberately. 165 00:20:31,520 --> 00:20:39,200 Scholars and researchers who have examined this theory often disagree on exactly how it might be applied in the classroom. 166 00:20:39,200 --> 00:20:51,440 For example, does reducing cognitive load mean handing ready-made explanations to students so they expend as little cognitive energy possible, which they could use to form new schemas? 167 00:20:51,440 --> 00:21:00,200 This certainly would fly in the face of the experience of many teachers, who have found that providing partial solutions can be more effective. 168 00:21:00,200 --> 00:21:05,520 Another dilemma arises when considering the use of audio-visual materials. 169 00:21:05,520 --> 00:21:14,480 While these tend to reduce cognitive load when used sparingly, overdoing it can actually increase the cognitive burden. 170 00:21:14,480 --> 00:21:31,200 Remember, though, that our aim in this book is not to devise more effective school curricula or philosophize about the teaching profession—rather, we are using these principles for ourselves, to become better teachers and facilitators in any learning endeavor. 171 00:21:31,200 --> 00:21:44,640 We can take the most obvious and powerful lesson from this theory: that learning, when it occurs naturally, is incremental and happens in small units that build on one another. 172 00:21:44,640 --> 00:21:55,520 Also, if we hope to teach to our best abilities, we need to find ways to mirror this natural learning process and support it in the people we’re attempting to teach. 173 00:21:55,520 --> 00:22:02,960 This means paying close attention to cognitive load—does your student have enough stored knowledge to draw on? 174 00:22:02,960 --> 00:22:05,600 Are you presenting too many things at once? 175 00:22:05,600 --> 00:22:13,120 How are you pacing the delivery of information, and is this overwhelming or gently challenging your student? 176 00:22:13,120 --> 00:22:22,640 A related way of thinking about human learning is called the information processing model, where the brain is seen as a kind of computer. 177 00:22:22,640 --> 00:22:28,600 It begins with sensing and perceiving information, where we determine whether it’s worth paying attention to. 178 00:22:28,600 --> 00:22:40,480 Then, we hold this information chunk in our short-term or working memory for a few seconds but, unless we commit it to long-term memory somehow, it more or less disappears. 179 00:22:40,480 --> 00:22:53,000 The next step, if it happens, is the information is encoded and filed away in long-term memory in a mental schema, along with any cues to help with retrieval later on. 180 00:22:53,000 --> 00:22:58,960 The next step would then be retrieval, which is often triggered by a specific environment. 181 00:22:58,960 --> 00:23:03,280 So how can we use this to become better teachers? 182 00:23:03,280 --> 00:23:05,680 Let’s look at it through an example. 183 00:23:05,680 --> 00:23:10,360 Say you want to teach a group of people the benefits of using a certain product. 184 00:23:10,360 --> 00:23:17,040 First, you’ll need to find ways to help this group retain the information in their sensory memory. 185 00:23:17,040 --> 00:23:25,160 As the name suggests, you do this by appealing to various senses, of which the most important are sight and hearing. 186 00:23:25,160 --> 00:23:31,080 To do this, show them the product and distribute some around so the group can touch and feel it. 187 00:23:31,080 --> 00:23:40,200 You should also explain the benefits of using it orally through words, as well as visually through infographics and other materials. 188 00:23:40,200 --> 00:23:45,560 Different people learn better when emphasis is placed on different senses. 189 00:23:45,560 --> 00:23:53,320 Using hearing, or words, will help some learn better, whereas others will respond to being able to feel the product in their hands. 190 00:23:53,320 --> 00:23:59,440 Then, we need to ensure that sensory memory converts to short-term memory. 191 00:23:59,440 --> 00:24:10,520 Factors that influence this transfer are the amount of information that needs to be processed, the level of attention from the student, and individual cognitive abilities. 192 00:24:10,520 --> 00:24:23,200 Thus, if you can make the earlier step as interesting as possible to engage and gain the attention of your students, you’ll activate their senses and help transfer their learning to short-term memory. 193 00:24:23,200 --> 00:24:28,600 The final step is to take this information and commit it to their long-term memory. 194 00:24:28,600 --> 00:24:32,400 This can be tricky, but repetition is key. 195 00:24:32,400 --> 00:24:40,360 Find novel ways to say the same thing so that you can drill the most important bits into the minds of your students. 196 00:24:40,360 --> 00:24:47,400 Keep the information you’re providing focused and break everything into small, digestible parts. 197 00:24:47,400 --> 00:24:50,440 Connect it to a real-life purpose. 198 00:24:50,440 --> 00:24:56,280 So, if you want them to sell the product, emphasize which benefits are most popular. 199 00:24:56,280 --> 00:25:02,560 If you want them to start using it, emphasize common problems and how the product will help solve them. 200 00:25:02,560 --> 00:25:11,000 All of this will help them retain the information in their long-term memory, ensuring they won’t forget it for a long time to come. 201 00:25:11,000 --> 00:25:18,800 Teaching tips from the cognitive load theory and the information processing model 202 00:25:18,800 --> 00:25:18,800 203 00:25:18,800 --> 00:25:25,600 Knowing about the brain’s “architecture” and its procedural processes, we can optimize learning. 204 00:25:25,600 --> 00:25:38,680 According to John Sweller, we can process a maximum of two or three pieces of new information in our working memory at any one moment, and hold this focus for around twenty seconds. 205 00:25:38,680 --> 00:25:45,080 When we transfer something from working to long-term memory, we can be said to have learnt it. 206 00:25:45,080 --> 00:25:47,280 So, take your time. 207 00:25:47,280 --> 00:25:54,360 Break information into chunks and feed them into long-term memory slowly and steadily. 208 00:25:54,360 --> 00:25:58,480 Be explicit and detailed in your explanation. 209 00:25:58,480 --> 00:26:06,760 Provide plenty of examples, and link as many concepts as possible to those your student already possesses, so as to anchor them. 210 00:26:06,760 --> 00:26:14,480 Other tips include taking a short break every ten or fifteen minutes, since attention often flags anyway. 211 00:26:14,480 --> 00:26:18,760 You could switch activities rather than stopping learning entirely. 212 00:26:18,760 --> 00:26:20,880 Just keep things fresh and moving. 213 00:26:20,880 --> 00:26:24,520 The goal is to keep your student engaged and active. 214 00:26:24,520 --> 00:26:31,880 Encourage conversation with questions and prompts (recall the inquiry-based approach), and mix things up. 215 00:26:31,880 --> 00:26:40,960 Since time and attention are limited, guide the process by showing your student what’s most important and what they should focus most on. 216 00:26:40,960 --> 00:26:50,360 Draw on long-term memory by connecting new material to old, contextualizing, inviting deeper thinking about the topic or looking at case studies, examples or problems. 217 00:26:50,360 --> 00:26:53,440 To lighten cognitive load, keep things simple and well organized. 218 00:26:53,440 --> 00:27:00,640 For example, devise an hour’s lesson around four fifteen-minute chunks, each with an opportunity to create a simple mind map that summarizes the points learnt. 219 00:27:00,640 --> 00:27:07,440 Spend lots of time drilling and reviewing—the more you keep thinking about a particular point, the more chance it has of getting encoded into long-term memory. 220 00:27:07,440 --> 00:27:14,000 Finally, get your student involved in these lesson plans or deliberations—explain how you’re organizing concepts and mapping out ideas. 221 00:27:14,000 --> 00:27:20,880 Let them see the relationship between each of the concepts they’re learning, and how it all fits together. 222 00:27:20,880 --> 00:27:34,360 Remember, the brain loves connections: the more meaningful connections you can draw between chunks of information, the better the brain will be able to file and retrieve that information later. 223 00:27:34,360 --> 00:27:37,120 Scaffolding: the Power of Baby Steps 224 00:27:37,120 --> 00:27:37,120 225 00:27:37,120 --> 00:27:44,440 Being a good teacher is all about understanding how people naturally absorb, retain and use new information. 226 00:27:44,440 --> 00:27:50,400 If you think about any skill or knowledge you currently have, chances are you learnt it gradually, one step at a time. 227 00:27:50,400 --> 00:27:59,680 Experts always start out as novices, and the path from one to the other is filled with incremental changes rather than giant leaps. 228 00:27:59,680 --> 00:28:10,360 The fancy name for this process of ramping up mastery from lower levels of capacity is called scaffolding, since it refers to the careful building of a complex mental structure with smaller, simpler units. 229 00:28:10,360 --> 00:28:22,800 The great thing about learning how to use scaffolding, as either a teacher or a student, is that it’s a truly transferable skill—it’s hard to imagine any domain in life where it isn’t applicable. 230 00:28:22,800 --> 00:28:26,360 Your overall goal as a teacher using the technique of scaffolding is to simplify. 231 00:28:26,360 --> 00:28:32,680 As we’ve seen, this reduces cognitive load because all the brain has to manage in working memory is a small chunk of information. 232 00:28:32,680 --> 00:28:38,000 Once this is banked in long-term memory, the next step, level or unit can be considered. 233 00:28:38,000 --> 00:28:42,520 Depending on your student and what you’re attempting to teach them, your scaffolding process can vary in complexity. 234 00:28:42,520 --> 00:28:46,880 For example, you might follow a series of graded stages to teach them how to use a piece of software they’re unfamiliar with. 235 00:28:46,880 --> 00:28:55,800 Building a scaffold is like providing mental support and structure as the person builds up to the bigger goal: understanding how to use the entire program effectively. 236 00:28:55,800 --> 00:29:04,880 You might start with provision of knowledge: you could give some explanations and instructions for the program, what it’s used for, and a general introduction to the basic principles. 237 00:29:04,880 --> 00:29:14,840 You could then move on to a demonstration of strategies: you might run through a few operations on the program, showing students exactly what to do to achieve certain outcomes, as they watch you. 238 00:29:14,840 --> 00:29:20,840 You could extend this to modeling: this is where you construct a model encompassing the information you’ve shared, or show how the previous strategies fit together. 239 00:29:20,840 --> 00:29:26,600 Next you could move to questioning: you might ask them to guess how to do another related operation, given what you’ve already shown them. 240 00:29:26,600 --> 00:29:30,400 Your demonstration might naturally prompt a question—what do we do if we want to perform a slightly different operation? 241 00:29:30,400 --> 00:29:32,400 Can we still use the same technique? 242 00:29:32,400 --> 00:29:37,520 This could be your cue to move on to showing them another, more complex strategy—providing they thoroughly understand the first one. 243 00:29:37,520 --> 00:29:43,400 You could constantly make use of instructing as you go: tell your student, “you click here to do XYZ” or “this is how you import a file.” 244 00:29:43,400 --> 00:29:43,400 245 00:29:43,400 --> 00:29:51,120 Throughout, you can offer feedback and correction: Ask a question, see how your student responds, and infer where their level of understanding is. 246 00:29:51,120 --> 00:29:57,640 Gently and positively offer corrections, backtracking to previous instructions or simpler concepts to check understanding. 247 00:29:57,640 --> 00:30:04,680 You might use general feedback like, “It’s quicker to use a keyboard shortcut for that” or “you might want to try a different setting there.” 248 00:30:04,680 --> 00:30:04,680 249 00:30:04,680 --> 00:30:20,880 Finally, you can make use of restructuring the task as you go: set your student mini-tasks to complete before tackling something more complicated, or deliberately ignore some aspects of the program you’re teaching so you can make a particular point more clearly. 250 00:30:20,880 --> 00:30:25,240 You might show them how not to do something just so they understand why it doesn’t work. 251 00:30:25,240 --> 00:30:32,040 For example, deliberately use the program incorrectly and let them see how it becomes unusable or crashes. 252 00:30:32,040 --> 00:30:42,400 If all these steps sound complicated, they don’t have to be—scaffolding can be subtle and spontaneous without losing its effectiveness. 253 00:30:42,400 --> 00:30:49,960 It might be as simple as reminding a child to slow down, read through the sentence again and sound out difficult words if necessary. 254 00:30:49,960 --> 00:31:01,680 Encourage your student to look at the simplest chunks first, and once they’ve mastered those, draw their attention to the connections between them using questions, prompts and clues. 255 00:31:01,680 --> 00:31:13,160 The best teachers are able to help a student arrive at the next level of complexity on their own—the best “lesson plan” is where the students themselves are eager to move onto the next step! 256 00:31:13,160 --> 00:31:26,640 Another way to think about scaffolding is to imagine that it’s a gradual process of “handing over” to the student—you slowly progress from teacher-centered to student-centered. 257 00:31:26,640 --> 00:31:38,560 This approach has been called “I do, we do, you do” or sometimes “show me, help me, let me.” Let’s look at each of the three steps using a simple example of teaching someone how to bake a tricky French souffle. 258 00:31:38,560 --> 00:31:40,760 Teacher-led instruction, or “I do” 259 00:31:40,760 --> 00:31:40,760 260 00:31:40,760 --> 00:31:46,080 You tell your student to watch you carefully as you prepare the recipe, so they can see how it’s done. 261 00:31:46,080 --> 00:31:51,960 As you do so, you give some instruction and direction, actively sharing knowledge which they passively receive. 262 00:31:51,960 --> 00:31:56,680 You want to cover all the new concepts, skills and information, for example, “I’m using a metal bowl, see? 263 00:31:56,680 --> 00:32:04,000 Metal bowls get squeaky clean and you don’t want even the tiniest residue of any oil in there, or it will spoil your egg whites and they won’t get to this stiff-peak stage.” 264 00:32:04,000 --> 00:32:04,000 265 00:32:04,000 --> 00:32:13,240 At this stage, you are making sure your student is oriented to new material, and knows what the purpose of the lesson is (in this case, watch closely so you can do the same!). 266 00:32:13,240 --> 00:32:16,640 You want to clearly set limitations and goals, i.e. 267 00:32:16,640 --> 00:32:18,920 today we are making a perfect souffle. 268 00:32:18,920 --> 00:32:26,000 Draw on any previous knowledge, give meaningful and relevant explanations, and even examples. 269 00:32:26,000 --> 00:32:28,600 Teacher and student cooperation, or “we do” 270 00:32:28,600 --> 00:32:28,600 271 00:32:28,600 --> 00:32:33,480 This is the part where you use “training wheels” and gradually ramp up your student’s participation. 272 00:32:33,480 --> 00:32:38,680 You are still giving instruction, but it’s now directed toward guiding their action. 273 00:32:38,680 --> 00:32:47,880 You could supervise them making a souffle using what you’ve taught them, although you’re still there, doing some of the work, and prompting and correcting as you go. 274 00:32:47,880 --> 00:32:55,200 It’s about providing an opportunity to practice a new skill or retrieve some stored information, but with a little support—psychological and cognitive. 275 00:32:55,200 --> 00:33:06,280 Go one step at a time (remembering that sequences typically lower cognitive load) and use questions and prompts to lead the student to the next step. 276 00:33:06,280 --> 00:33:19,880 “OK, so now it’s time to put it in the oven… Do you remember where in the oven it goes and why?” Encourage your student to demonstrate their understanding or skill in a limited way at first—a little encouragement and positive feedback is always appreciated! 277 00:33:19,880 --> 00:33:25,320 Mistakes are a part of the process, and will allow you to stop, adjust and reinforce the correct way. 278 00:33:25,320 --> 00:33:27,680 Student-led practice, or “you do” 279 00:33:27,680 --> 00:33:27,680 280 00:33:27,680 --> 00:33:34,560 The ultimate goal is for your student to be able to perform the skill or retrieve the information on their own, without you. 281 00:33:34,560 --> 00:33:36,280 At some point, the training wheels come off. 282 00:33:36,280 --> 00:33:43,600 After some time you might ask your student to prepare a perfect souffle for you from scratch, without your supervision. 283 00:33:43,600 --> 00:33:50,560 This gives them the chance to independently demonstrate their progress, and compare this against the goals you both set in the beginning. 284 00:33:50,560 --> 00:34:03,720 Obviously, if your student produces what looks like a deflated hockey puck that was recently on fire, it’s time to go back to the drawing board and build better scaffolding! 285 00:34:03,720 --> 00:34:04,560 Takeaways 286 00:34:04,560 --> 00:34:04,560 287 00:34:04,560 --> 00:34:17,040 • We can draw on the five most common pedagogical approaches to become better teachers, whether that’s inside the classroom or in more informal contexts. 288 00:34:17,040 --> 00:34:21,880 • The constructivist approach is about building up knowledge and skill from information that is already known to the student. 289 00:34:21,880 --> 00:34:28,560 You help them “construct” new knowledge by relating everything to this set of existing knowledge in order to connect two different concepts. 290 00:34:28,560 --> 00:34:34,520 • The integrative approach focuses on making lessons practical and applicable in the real world. 291 00:34:34,520 --> 00:34:39,520 The more relevant and contextual new information is, the more likely students are to retain it. 292 00:34:39,520 --> 00:34:45,960 • The collaborative approach uses the strengths of group collaboration between students to support learning. 293 00:34:45,960 --> 00:34:55,440 You rely on students within the group to teach each other by exposing them to unique viewpoints and knowledge that everyone has. 294 00:34:55,440 --> 00:35:05,000 • The inquiry-based approach is about directing learning by asking the student to devise a question, a method for arriving at an answer, the answer, or some combination of these three. 295 00:35:05,000 --> 00:35:14,320 • The reflective approach is about tailoring the teaching methods used to best fit the student in front of you, regularly taking time to appraise what works and what doesn’t. 296 00:35:14,320 --> 00:35:15,240 • The brain is not a machine. 297 00:35:15,240 --> 00:35:25,840 Cognitive load theory tells us that as the brain’s power is limited, we need to think strategically and reduce load while maximizing learning. 298 00:35:25,840 --> 00:35:30,720 This can be done in a variety of ways that respect rather than push against the brain’s natural learning processes. 299 00:35:30,720 --> 00:35:41,080 Some strategies involve keeping your material focused on particular topics, repeating information as much as you can, and appealing to the senses in ways that pique attention. 300 00:35:41,080 --> 00:35:51,600 • Scaffolding is the principle of making small, incremental improvements and building bigger concepts or skills from smaller, simpler ones. 301 00:35:51,600 --> 00:36:01,480 This can be summarized as “I do, we do, you do” to show how the teacher gradually hands over control and mastery to the student. 302 00:36:01,480 --> 00:36:15,880 Today we explore key insights from this chapter in Peter Holland's book on covering lessons about resilience, growth, and determination. 303 00:36:15,880 --> 00:36:18,960 Here are the takeaways from today's episode. 304 00:36:18,960 --> 00:36:29,960 We can draw on the five most common pedagogical approaches to become better teachers, whether that's inside the classroom or in more informal contexts. 305 00:36:29,960 --> 00:36:37,680 The constructivist approach is about building up knowledge and skill from information that is already known to the student. 306 00:36:37,680 --> 00:36:46,680 You help them construct new knowledge by relating everything to this set of existing knowledge in order to connect two different concepts. 307 00:36:46,680 --> 00:36:54,160 The integrative approach focuses on making lessons practical and applicable in the real world. 308 00:36:54,160 --> 00:37:00,960 The more relevant and contextual new information is, the more likely students are to retain it. 309 00:37:00,960 --> 00:37:08,320 The collaborative approach uses the strengths of group collaboration between students to support learning. 310 00:37:08,320 --> 00:37:16,520 You rely on students within the group to teach each other by exposing them to unique viewpoints and knowledge that everyone has. 311 00:37:16,520 --> 00:37:29,120 The inquiry-based approach is about directing learning by asking the students to devise a question, a method for arriving at an answer, the answer, or some combination of these three. 312 00:37:29,120 --> 00:37:41,360 The reflective approach is about tailoring the teaching methods used to best fit the student in front of you, regularly taking time to appraise what works and what doesn't. 313 00:37:41,360 --> 00:37:44,600 The brain's not a machine. 314 00:37:44,600 --> 00:37:52,920 Cognitive load theory tells us that as the brain's power is limited, we need to think strategically and reduce load while maximizing learning. 315 00:37:52,920 --> 00:38:00,240 This can be done in a variety of ways that respect rather than push against the brain's natural learning processes. 316 00:38:00,240 --> 00:38:14,440 Some strategies involve keeping your material focused on particular topics, repeating information as much as you can, and appealing to the senses in ways that pique attention. 317 00:38:14,440 --> 00:38:21,800 Learning is the principle of making small, incremental improvements and building bigger concepts or skills from smaller, simpler ones. 318 00:38:21,800 --> 00:38:32,640 This can be summarized as, I do, we do, you do, to show how the teacher gradually hands over control and mastery to the student. 319 00:38:32,640 --> 00:38:37,640 And as we close out the episode, we'll leave you with this from Nelson Mandela. 320 00:38:37,640 --> 00:38:41,080 Do not judge me by my successes. 321 00:38:41,080 --> 00:38:50,000 Judge me by how many times I fell down and got back up.