WEBVTT

00:00:01.339 --> 00:00:02.960

The Curse of Knowledge

00:00:03.839 --> 00:00:07.320

That's a cognitive bias that so many of us have felt

00:00:07.780 --> 00:00:09.480

that goes a little bit like,

00:00:10.060 --> 00:00:12.160

what? You didn't know that?

00:00:12.600 --> 00:00:16.500

We assume that everyone knew whatever that thing was.

00:00:16.740 --> 00:00:19.520

We assume that there's way more common knowledge out there

00:00:19.660 --> 00:00:20.760

than there actually is.

00:00:21.190 --> 00:00:22.300

It has a name or two.

00:00:22.430 --> 00:00:26.140

It's called the Curse of Knowledge or the Curse of Expertise.

00:00:26.500 --> 00:00:56.320

If you've done a hobby, and you're like really immersed in that community around this hobby, and

eventually many of us then think that everyone has so much more knowledge about that thing. Like for me,

improv comedy. I got into improv comedy, and after a good while, I thought that the average person knew way

more about it than they actually do. In reality, most people might maybe know that there was that show,

00:00:56.480 --> 00:01:25.560

that time that did that improv stuff. Whose line is it? Yeah, that show, right? But after you do improv for a

while, you're gonna forget that it's just a you thing. And that's a pretty common experience regardless of

what hobbies and activities we get into. And for you, it's probably not improv. People who have very

specialized information from improvisers to financial experts to doctors,

00:01:25.680 --> 00:01:55.660

They regularly overestimate how obvious or clear their ideas or strategies are to others. A 20-fold

overestimate is very common in this particular cognitive bias. We really live in our heads when it comes to

these things that we think about all the time. For example, medical doctors overestimate how much their

patients understand by 20 to 30 percent. And this is for no other reason than difficult

00:01:59.680 --> 00:02:25.640

I've had to remind myself this regularly when working in the tech space as an educator and as a freelancer.

Steven Pinker, who's a linguist, observes that academians tend to write poorly because they assume their

knowledge is common. And as a result, writers use jargon and they fail to provide the concrete details that

readers need to know in order to visualize or understand these concepts.

00:02:25.680 --> 00:02:55.660

concepts. I'll link to that in the show notes. So if we're putting together our learning and our ideas

online to an audience, we have to make sure that we do those reality checks first. And that's just to make

sure that we remove the assumptions. We don't need to actually change what we're saying. So you can test

your content if that's available to you. Give concrete examples instead of those abstract explanations

and specific stories

00:02:55.700 --> 00:03:22.800

are a lot more effective than general principles. And this happens because concrete specifics, they

provide that context, that expertise kind of took out of our mental space. So recognize your knowledge,

remove those assumptions. That's a really good step towards solving this in our episodes. I'm Jen DeHaan.

This is the Credibility Minute. You can find more episodes and get in touch with me at stereoforest.com/minute.