1 00:00:00,000 --> 00:00:12,400 Hello listeners, welcome to the Social Skills Coaching Podcast on Wednesday, April 24, 2 00:00:12,400 --> 00:00:19,600 2024, where you become more likeable, more charismatic, and more productive. 3 00:00:19,600 --> 00:00:25,160 Today we're diving into the world of Conversation Mastery, with a chapter from Patrick King's 4 00:00:25,160 --> 00:00:29,000 book, Conversation Skills Training. 5 00:00:29,000 --> 00:00:34,560 Patrick is a communication expert who helps people, just like you, improve their social 6 00:00:34,560 --> 00:00:37,920 skills and build stronger relationships. 7 00:00:37,920 --> 00:00:46,200 You can find more about Patrick and his consulting services at bit.ly-slash-pk-consulting. 8 00:00:46,200 --> 00:00:52,440 We'll be uncovering the secrets to keeping conversations flowing and engaging, all while 9 00:00:52,440 --> 00:00:55,640 making a lasting positive impression. 10 00:00:55,640 --> 00:01:01,160 So, whether you're looking to conquer networking events, feel more comfortable at parties, 11 00:01:01,160 --> 00:01:06,120 or simply have more fulfilling conversations with friends and family, this episode is for 12 00:01:06,120 --> 00:01:08,120 you. 13 00:01:08,120 --> 00:01:10,520 Are you ready to become a conversational charmer? 14 00:01:10,520 --> 00:01:11,880 Well, let's get started. 15 00:01:25,640 --> 00:01:28,760 The rules for communication are pretty basic. 16 00:01:28,760 --> 00:01:31,640 Talk with people and not to them. 17 00:01:31,640 --> 00:01:32,640 Be present. 18 00:01:32,640 --> 00:01:33,640 Listen. 19 00:01:33,640 --> 00:01:34,640 Easy, huh? 20 00:01:34,640 --> 00:01:42,320 Yet, somehow, almost all of us could stand to be better conversationalists. 21 00:01:42,320 --> 00:01:47,040 The irony is that nobody ever wakes up in the morning and says to themselves, 22 00:01:47,040 --> 00:01:51,320 Today I'm going to be a complete bore to talk to. 23 00:01:51,320 --> 00:01:57,680 Nobody wants to be that person who constantly one ups everyone else, interrupts, or talks 24 00:01:57,680 --> 00:01:58,680 too much. 25 00:01:58,680 --> 00:02:04,360 Here's a rule for good communication that you might not have considered. 26 00:02:04,360 --> 00:02:11,040 Having charm and charisma is not about you, it's about the other person. 27 00:02:11,040 --> 00:02:17,280 So many of us embark on a mission to be more interesting and likable in conversation, but 28 00:02:17,280 --> 00:02:21,960 just by having this attitude, we sabotage ourselves. 29 00:02:21,960 --> 00:02:24,080 Why? 30 00:02:24,080 --> 00:02:26,520 Because we have it backward. 31 00:02:26,520 --> 00:02:32,520 Being a great communicator is not about having other people listen to you like you or compliment 32 00:02:32,520 --> 00:02:41,400 you, it's about you making other people feel heard, liked, and praised. 33 00:02:41,400 --> 00:02:47,960 The irony is that when we try too hard to be witty and impressive, our focus narrows 34 00:02:47,960 --> 00:02:55,820 down to our egos, and we instantly become the opposite of what we're hoping to be. 35 00:02:55,820 --> 00:03:03,400 The other person disappears, and we are engaging in what is, for all intents and purposes, 36 00:03:03,400 --> 00:03:07,160 a boring monologue. 37 00:03:07,160 --> 00:03:14,520 Director, consultant, author, and coach Dr. Carl Albrecht explained in Psychology Today 38 00:03:14,520 --> 00:03:24,240 that every conversation is made up of three key elements, one, declaratives, two, questions, 39 00:03:24,240 --> 00:03:28,360 three, qualifiers. 40 00:03:28,360 --> 00:03:31,480 Declaratives are simply statements of fact. 41 00:03:31,480 --> 00:03:34,160 For example, the sky is blue. 42 00:03:34,800 --> 00:03:40,800 However, to make things more complicated, they aren't always exactly facts, but opinions 43 00:03:40,800 --> 00:03:45,320 that are presented as though they are facts. 44 00:03:45,320 --> 00:03:50,960 Light blue is too weak a color to wear to that job interview. 45 00:03:50,960 --> 00:03:56,120 Questions are self-explanatory, although this doesn't include rhetorical questions that 46 00:03:56,120 --> 00:04:01,800 take the grammatical form of a question, but are not literally asking the other person to 47 00:04:01,800 --> 00:04:03,560 respond. 48 00:04:03,560 --> 00:04:08,680 For example, what is it with this weather today? 49 00:04:08,680 --> 00:04:10,800 What's your favorite color? 50 00:04:10,800 --> 00:04:13,200 What should I wear to the interview? 51 00:04:13,200 --> 00:04:20,240 Finally, qualifiers are something we've encountered already and include any words or phrases intended 52 00:04:20,240 --> 00:04:24,280 to soften or moderate what is being said. 53 00:04:24,280 --> 00:04:33,760 For example, in my opinion, I'm wondering if I could be wrong, but as far as I know, 54 00:04:33,760 --> 00:04:41,240 I'm not speaking for everyone here, but qualifiers are also great at helping you express uncertainty 55 00:04:41,240 --> 00:04:45,720 or make a claim, but not too strongly. 56 00:04:45,720 --> 00:04:52,440 So instead of saying that light blue is a weak color, you could say it might be a slightly 57 00:04:52,440 --> 00:04:54,760 weak color. 58 00:04:54,760 --> 00:05:02,240 Instead of saying Freud was a pervert, you say, in my opinion, it may be the case that 59 00:05:02,240 --> 00:05:07,600 Freud in fact had a distorted sexuality. 60 00:05:07,600 --> 00:05:11,840 Now Albrecht suggested what he calls the rule of three. 61 00:05:11,840 --> 00:05:17,320 Simply, in a conversation, make sure that you are never making three declarative statements 62 00:05:17,320 --> 00:05:18,920 in a row. 63 00:05:18,920 --> 00:05:27,480 Instead, include plenty of questions or qualifiers, i.e., softer and more moderate declaratives, 64 00:05:27,480 --> 00:05:30,160 to give your speech a little more flexibility. 65 00:05:30,160 --> 00:05:36,280 Crucially, doing so will make sure that the conversation doesn't become bogged down in 66 00:05:36,280 --> 00:05:39,600 ego and narcissism. 67 00:05:39,600 --> 00:05:45,800 A question is a way to bat the conversational ball over the net and to the other person 68 00:05:45,920 --> 00:05:52,400 who is then invited to say what they want to before batting the ball back again. 69 00:05:52,400 --> 00:05:57,880 A modifier is halfway between a question and a declarative statement. 70 00:05:57,880 --> 00:06:02,440 You say what you want to say, but you leave a little room in there for someone else to 71 00:06:02,440 --> 00:06:05,400 add what they want to. 72 00:06:05,400 --> 00:06:10,800 There's nothing wrong with a declarative per se, but it is the sort of thing that closes 73 00:06:10,800 --> 00:06:13,960 off any avenues for connection. 74 00:06:14,000 --> 00:06:20,040 Beyond bland agreement or outright disagreement, that is, both of which do not actually further 75 00:06:20,040 --> 00:06:22,720 the conversation. 76 00:06:22,720 --> 00:06:29,320 Try it, and you may be surprised at just how much more your conversations flow, and you'll 77 00:06:29,320 --> 00:06:33,680 come across as more likeable too. 78 00:06:33,680 --> 00:06:39,080 Understanding the rule of three means you won't soon run out of things to say in any conversation. 79 00:06:39,080 --> 00:06:46,080 You can basically never go wrong if you, A, ask a question, or, B, say whatever declarative 80 00:06:47,120 --> 00:06:53,800 statement you were just about to say, but soften it with a qualifier. 81 00:06:53,800 --> 00:06:56,600 Consider the following conversation. 82 00:06:56,600 --> 00:06:59,880 I got this really bad shoulder pain. 83 00:06:59,880 --> 00:07:03,240 The physiotherapist says it's bursitis. 84 00:07:03,240 --> 00:07:05,960 Wow, bursitis. 85 00:07:05,960 --> 00:07:08,520 My grandmother had that last year. 86 00:07:08,520 --> 00:07:11,240 It's more common than you think, you know. 87 00:07:11,240 --> 00:07:14,440 Yeah, well, it's the first I've heard of it. 88 00:07:14,440 --> 00:07:18,160 Apparently it was most likely caused by the COVID vaccine. 89 00:07:18,160 --> 00:07:21,760 Well, you have to consider all the possible cases. 90 00:07:21,760 --> 00:07:24,640 There are lots of things that could be to blame. 91 00:07:24,640 --> 00:07:30,000 It's actually repetitive strain that causes most cases of bursitis. 92 00:07:30,000 --> 00:07:31,240 Sure, yeah. 93 00:07:31,240 --> 00:07:37,240 Anyway, my physiotherapist says it's an injury that can happen when the needle is placed 94 00:07:37,480 --> 00:07:39,600 slightly in the wrong place. 95 00:07:39,600 --> 00:07:43,200 A lot of those people giving vaccines didn't get the right training. 96 00:07:43,200 --> 00:07:47,480 Well, let me tell you, it hurts like hell. 97 00:07:47,480 --> 00:07:49,480 I'm sure. 98 00:07:49,480 --> 00:07:53,680 The best thing would be to have plenty of rest, I guess. 99 00:07:53,680 --> 00:08:00,680 Now, take a look at the above conversation and ask yourself how much you like person 100 00:08:00,680 --> 00:08:02,400 b. 101 00:08:02,400 --> 00:08:07,920 They're not being a conversational narcissist in the sense that it's all me, me, me. 102 00:08:07,920 --> 00:08:12,840 But somehow their ego seems to loom large in the exchange above. 103 00:08:12,840 --> 00:08:14,560 Why? 104 00:08:14,560 --> 00:08:20,520 You'll notice that everything that person b says is a declarative statement. 105 00:08:20,520 --> 00:08:25,320 It gives the conversation a flat, dead feeling. 106 00:08:25,320 --> 00:08:33,080 After a declarative, there's not much to do except agree, disagree, or stop talking. 107 00:08:33,080 --> 00:08:37,920 In the extreme, too many declaratives like this can actually make the person seem as 108 00:08:37,920 --> 00:08:44,920 though they are lecturing, preaching, or explaining, i.e. it can feel very dull and 109 00:08:46,400 --> 00:08:49,320 even condescending. 110 00:08:49,320 --> 00:08:52,400 Let's look at a different conversation. 111 00:08:52,520 --> 00:08:56,320 I've got this really bad shoulder pain. 112 00:08:56,320 --> 00:08:59,760 The physiotherapist says it's bursitis. 113 00:08:59,760 --> 00:09:02,000 Wow, bursitis. 114 00:09:02,000 --> 00:09:04,720 My grandmother had that last year. 115 00:09:04,720 --> 00:09:07,440 It's more common than you think, you know. 116 00:09:07,440 --> 00:09:10,920 Yeah, well, it's the first I've heard of it. 117 00:09:10,920 --> 00:09:14,280 Apparently it was most likely caused by the COVID vaccine. 118 00:09:14,280 --> 00:09:15,320 Really? 119 00:09:15,320 --> 00:09:17,080 Well, that's interesting. 120 00:09:17,080 --> 00:09:22,000 You mean you had a bad reaction to something that was in the vaccine? 121 00:09:22,000 --> 00:09:23,640 Actually, no. 122 00:09:23,640 --> 00:09:29,480 My physiotherapist says it's an injury that can happen when the needle is placed just slightly 123 00:09:29,480 --> 00:09:31,480 in the wrong place. 124 00:09:31,480 --> 00:09:32,480 Ouch. 125 00:09:32,480 --> 00:09:39,840 Well, I may be wrong about this, but I seem to remember reading an article last year about 126 00:09:39,840 --> 00:09:46,040 how many volunteers had emergency training to learn to give the vaccine. 127 00:09:46,040 --> 00:09:49,640 Maybe the person who jabbed you just wasn't all that experienced? 128 00:09:49,920 --> 00:09:52,080 Yeah, exactly. 129 00:09:52,080 --> 00:09:54,240 That's what I think, too. 130 00:09:54,240 --> 00:09:57,280 It's annoying because it really hurts. 131 00:09:57,280 --> 00:09:59,320 I can imagine. 132 00:09:59,320 --> 00:10:01,680 What do you think you'll do now? 133 00:10:01,680 --> 00:10:05,920 Have you got something relaxing planned for the weekend? 134 00:10:05,920 --> 00:10:11,920 First, just ask yourself which person you feel is more likeable. 135 00:10:11,920 --> 00:10:15,160 The two conversations are very, very similar. 136 00:10:15,160 --> 00:10:17,480 Both are perfectly acceptable. 137 00:10:17,480 --> 00:10:24,000 And there's no offense caused or any major rupture in social etiquette in either one. 138 00:10:24,000 --> 00:10:29,400 And yet, even in this short interaction, you can probably see the big difference the rule 139 00:10:29,400 --> 00:10:37,760 of three makes and how a person using declaratives 100% comes across so differently from someone 140 00:10:37,760 --> 00:10:42,640 using a mix of all three conversational types. 141 00:10:42,640 --> 00:10:49,840 Person B likely doesn't believe themselves to be bad at conversation, but they nevertheless 142 00:10:49,840 --> 00:10:58,920 will be perceived as less friendly, less likable, and somehow less enjoyable to speak to. 143 00:10:58,920 --> 00:11:05,400 The effect of such interactions gradually and imperceptibly adds up. 144 00:11:05,400 --> 00:11:10,920 Others may not be able to put their finger on why, but they may feel that person B is 145 00:11:10,920 --> 00:11:16,360 a bit boring, stuck up, rude, or a know-it-all. 146 00:11:16,360 --> 00:11:21,440 Crucially, it's not about the content of what you say. 147 00:11:21,440 --> 00:11:27,760 It's about the emotional implications and the energy in how you say it. 148 00:11:27,760 --> 00:11:34,640 Questions convey a sense of openness, possibility, humility, and receptivity. 149 00:11:34,640 --> 00:11:40,200 They can be playful and respectful, and can demonstrate empathy and compassion, as well 150 00:11:40,200 --> 00:11:47,240 as the covert message, I like you, I'm interested, tell me more. 151 00:11:47,240 --> 00:11:50,200 Qualified statements send a similar message. 152 00:11:50,200 --> 00:11:54,600 They say something, but it's a soft something. 153 00:11:54,600 --> 00:12:00,440 They signal to the other person that you are amenable, flexible, and ready to discuss and 154 00:12:00,440 --> 00:12:03,560 move with the flow. 155 00:12:03,560 --> 00:12:07,400 Declaratives, however, are a little like dead ends. 156 00:12:07,400 --> 00:12:12,920 They are pronouncements made that usually signal the end of conversation, rather than 157 00:12:12,920 --> 00:12:14,840 its beginning. 158 00:12:14,840 --> 00:12:20,440 They position you as a speaker with authority, and the other person as someone who is there 159 00:12:20,440 --> 00:12:24,040 primarily to hear this authority. 160 00:12:24,040 --> 00:12:31,600 Though there is absolutely a time and place for this energy, giving speeches, setting boundaries, 161 00:12:31,600 --> 00:12:34,200 or literally teaching someone. 162 00:12:34,200 --> 00:12:40,120 Too much of it means you're talking at, rather than talking with. 163 00:12:40,120 --> 00:12:45,920 In other words, questions and qualifiers open up a little room that invites the other person 164 00:12:45,920 --> 00:12:49,680 into the conversation. 165 00:12:49,680 --> 00:12:56,720 Declaratives tend to focus only on you and your message, while closing out the other person. 166 00:12:56,720 --> 00:12:59,480 Light blue is such a weak color. 167 00:12:59,480 --> 00:13:00,680 Is it? 168 00:13:00,680 --> 00:13:02,760 Says who? 169 00:13:02,760 --> 00:13:06,080 Literally imagine someone said this to you. 170 00:13:06,080 --> 00:13:11,680 Can you feel how difficult it is to say anything in response? 171 00:13:11,680 --> 00:13:17,720 Maybe it's an unpopular opinion, but I've never really liked light blue. 172 00:13:17,720 --> 00:13:23,200 Can you see how it's possible to have a strong opinion, but nevertheless frame it as exactly 173 00:13:23,200 --> 00:13:30,320 that, an opinion, and leave plenty of space for someone to respond and keep the conversation 174 00:13:30,320 --> 00:13:33,120 going? 175 00:13:33,120 --> 00:13:35,720 What's your favorite color? 176 00:13:35,720 --> 00:13:41,560 A question immediately opens up the conversation and signals that you are willing and able 177 00:13:41,560 --> 00:13:46,360 to share airtime, to listen, and to connect. 178 00:13:46,360 --> 00:13:52,000 It's a signal that you are putting your ego aside and making space for connection. 179 00:13:52,360 --> 00:13:58,080 Even though it's subtle, it conveys feelings of appreciation and generosity that are worth 180 00:13:58,080 --> 00:14:00,840 their weight in gold. 181 00:14:00,840 --> 00:14:06,800 By the way, it's worth noting that you don't have to become passive and unopinionated to 182 00:14:06,800 --> 00:14:08,440 be more likeable. 183 00:14:08,440 --> 00:14:15,080 In fact, occasionally saying something obviously outrageous is a great way to inject a little 184 00:14:15,080 --> 00:14:20,520 playfulness into a conversation and get things flowing. 185 00:14:20,520 --> 00:14:26,640 But note that these declaratives are, in a way, acting like questions or qualifiers, 186 00:14:26,640 --> 00:14:29,800 since they can't help but draw the other person in. 187 00:14:29,800 --> 00:14:33,680 Oh, I simply cannot wear light blue. 188 00:14:33,680 --> 00:14:37,600 It makes my eyeballs itchy just looking at it. 189 00:14:37,600 --> 00:14:41,640 Man, I hate light blue. 190 00:14:41,640 --> 00:14:47,400 They should make convicts wear it in prison as punishment. 191 00:14:47,400 --> 00:14:52,480 If the rule of three feels tricky to implement at first, don't worry, it can take time to 192 00:14:52,480 --> 00:14:54,680 break bad habits. 193 00:14:54,680 --> 00:15:00,560 One easy trick is to literally say whatever you are going to but add, don't you think, 194 00:15:00,560 --> 00:15:02,880 to the end of it. 195 00:15:02,880 --> 00:15:07,520 Light blue is such a weak color, don't you think? 196 00:15:07,520 --> 00:15:12,720 It immediately changes the entire energy and flow of the conversation and takes little 197 00:15:12,720 --> 00:15:15,840 to no effort on your part. 198 00:15:15,840 --> 00:15:23,200 Another trick to try is to simply convert any statement into a slightly softened question, 199 00:15:23,200 --> 00:15:27,320 instead of saying, that blue looks weird. 200 00:15:27,320 --> 00:15:32,840 Say, do you think the blue looks a little off? 201 00:15:32,840 --> 00:15:37,400 If you're the kind of person who likes to get on a soapbox and bombard people with your 202 00:15:37,400 --> 00:15:42,760 strongly held opinions, try to ask yourself why? 203 00:15:42,760 --> 00:15:49,880 Being dogmatic and lecturing people and forcefully pushing your opinions on them is not communication, 204 00:15:49,880 --> 00:15:53,520 but a roadblock to communication. 205 00:15:53,520 --> 00:15:57,920 People can veer toward declarative statements that our opinions dressed up as facts for 206 00:15:57,920 --> 00:16:00,040 a few reasons. 207 00:16:00,040 --> 00:16:05,800 We unconsciously think that the purpose of a conversation is to have our needs met and 208 00:16:05,800 --> 00:16:09,200 to be heard and seen by someone else. 209 00:16:09,200 --> 00:16:15,680 We may hold a core belief that we have to broadcast, defend, or force our perspectives 210 00:16:15,680 --> 00:16:22,760 and opinions, usually because they have not been appreciated or respected in the past. 211 00:16:22,760 --> 00:16:29,880 We are anxious and trying to win validation or appear smart and interesting. 212 00:16:29,880 --> 00:16:35,320 The irony is that using the rule of three is something you do for other people, but it's 213 00:16:35,320 --> 00:16:39,160 ultimately something that benefits you. 214 00:16:39,160 --> 00:16:45,560 Friends that are more balanced just flow better and lead to more comfort, trust, enjoyment, 215 00:16:45,560 --> 00:16:51,200 and attraction than others where one or both parties are talking forcefully at the other, 216 00:16:51,200 --> 00:16:58,320 who is simply trying to endure it, or waiting for their own turn on the soapbox. 217 00:16:58,320 --> 00:17:02,680 You'll notice as well that this trick works seamlessly with all the other advice we've 218 00:17:02,680 --> 00:17:04,960 covered so far. 219 00:17:04,960 --> 00:17:11,220 The rule of three helps you build rapport, removes barriers to connection, and helps 220 00:17:11,220 --> 00:17:18,360 you maintain a communication style that is relaxed and appealing. 221 00:17:18,360 --> 00:17:25,400 Sustain conversations with conversational threading and useful acronyms. 222 00:17:25,400 --> 00:17:30,880 Using the rule of three is all very well and good, but many people may find that this isn't 223 00:17:30,880 --> 00:17:32,880 quite enough. 224 00:17:32,880 --> 00:17:39,080 In casual conversation with new acquaintances, it can be really awkward. 225 00:17:39,080 --> 00:17:41,400 How do you know what to say? 226 00:17:41,400 --> 00:17:47,780 After the initial greetings and the how-are-us are done, then what? 227 00:17:47,780 --> 00:17:53,400 Some people are masters at starting conversations, but this energy fizzles out quickly and they 228 00:17:53,400 --> 00:17:58,640 find that they cannot deepen the connection to the next level. 229 00:17:58,640 --> 00:18:00,760 Perhaps you know somebody who's like this. 230 00:18:00,760 --> 00:18:03,640 They are perfectly friendly and amiable. 231 00:18:03,640 --> 00:18:09,480 You like them and enjoy their company, but somehow you never quite get past the small 232 00:18:09,480 --> 00:18:13,280 talk and into anything juicier. 233 00:18:13,280 --> 00:18:18,240 There can be a few reasons for this, but the solution is easy. 234 00:18:18,240 --> 00:18:22,160 Think of a relationship with someone as a piece of fabric. 235 00:18:22,160 --> 00:18:27,560 In the beginning, you literally just have a single thread with them. 236 00:18:27,560 --> 00:18:34,320 Your job is to spin that thread up and keep it strong, preventing it from snapping or 237 00:18:34,320 --> 00:18:36,360 getting knotted. 238 00:18:36,360 --> 00:18:41,160 If you talk to them again, you get the opportunity to create another thread. 239 00:18:41,160 --> 00:18:46,420 However, the fabric of your connection with them will be stronger if you can actually 240 00:18:46,420 --> 00:18:50,120 link up this new thread with the old one. 241 00:18:50,120 --> 00:18:51,640 Weave them together. 242 00:18:52,120 --> 00:18:58,600 Otherwise, you risk spinning up that same thread over and over again from scratch and 243 00:18:58,600 --> 00:19:05,360 you never weave a larger two-dimensional piece of fabric at all. 244 00:19:05,360 --> 00:19:07,120 Relationships take time. 245 00:19:07,120 --> 00:19:14,240 They're built out of all these conversational threads, thin as each one is on its own. 246 00:19:14,240 --> 00:19:19,480 The more there are, and the more connected they are, the more you will feel that your 247 00:19:19,480 --> 00:19:23,820 sense of rapport with the other person is deepening. 248 00:19:23,820 --> 00:19:27,600 Human beings are actually quite simple in this regard. 249 00:19:27,600 --> 00:19:33,440 They learn to trust and like what is repeated, predictable, and pleasant. 250 00:19:33,440 --> 00:19:37,400 Plus, they make meaning from connections. 251 00:19:37,400 --> 00:19:44,760 Unless your interaction with them connects to something, it will be quickly forgotten. 252 00:19:44,760 --> 00:19:50,440 It starts in the early stages with just keeping that thread spinning. 253 00:19:50,440 --> 00:19:56,880 Using the technique of conversational threading, you will never run out of things to say. 254 00:19:56,880 --> 00:19:58,840 The idea is simple. 255 00:19:58,840 --> 00:20:03,280 One, the other person speaks and you listen. 256 00:20:03,280 --> 00:20:08,080 Two, you notice a few threads that they start. 257 00:20:08,560 --> 00:20:15,240 Three, as the conversation unfolds, you pick up a thread and talk about it. 258 00:20:15,240 --> 00:20:23,400 Four, when you run out of things to say, you go back and find an old thread and follow that instead. 259 00:20:23,400 --> 00:20:25,680 Five, voila! 260 00:20:25,680 --> 00:20:30,240 Your conversation is running smoothly and comfortably. 261 00:20:30,240 --> 00:20:32,480 Let's take a closer look. 262 00:20:32,480 --> 00:20:40,360 A thread is what it sounds like, a word, phrase, image, or idea that is shared by the other person. 263 00:20:40,360 --> 00:20:43,680 It can be literally anything. 264 00:20:43,680 --> 00:20:51,400 For example, if the other person says, since both of my brother's kids got diagnosed with ADHD, 265 00:20:51,400 --> 00:20:55,160 we're all trying to cut down on screen time. 266 00:20:55,160 --> 00:20:58,880 There are quite a few threads in this statement, at least four. 267 00:20:58,880 --> 00:21:02,320 There's the brother, the brother's kids. 268 00:21:02,320 --> 00:21:09,920 The fact of having less screen time and the idea about ADHD diagnoses. 269 00:21:09,920 --> 00:21:14,160 As you listen, hear these threads and pick them up. 270 00:21:14,160 --> 00:21:20,840 For example, oh, is that your brother you said lived abroad? 271 00:21:20,840 --> 00:21:23,640 How old are your brother's kids? 272 00:21:23,640 --> 00:21:25,320 Yup, I can relate. 273 00:21:25,320 --> 00:21:29,800 I've been trying to manage my own internet addiction these days. 274 00:21:29,800 --> 00:21:31,000 Wow. 275 00:21:31,000 --> 00:21:33,480 ADHD in both kids. 276 00:21:33,480 --> 00:21:37,200 I wonder how common that is. 277 00:21:37,200 --> 00:21:43,040 As you can see, you can pick up a thread and ask a question about it, or just react and 278 00:21:43,040 --> 00:21:50,760 make a comment, but as you can imagine, each of these threads leads somewhere else. 279 00:21:50,760 --> 00:21:57,400 One will result in a long and impassioned conversation about the perils of TV on developing 280 00:21:57,400 --> 00:22:03,440 brains, while some others might fizzle out after a few short responses. 281 00:22:03,440 --> 00:22:06,880 For example, yeah, he's my older brother. 282 00:22:06,880 --> 00:22:11,360 He's currently living in Belgium with his family. 283 00:22:11,360 --> 00:22:17,400 Should you happen to talk a little more about Belgium or living abroad and find that avenue 284 00:22:17,400 --> 00:22:24,040 eventually runs dry, you don't need to worry, you can backtrack, drop the brother-Belgium 285 00:22:24,040 --> 00:22:27,480 thread and pick up somewhere else. 286 00:22:27,480 --> 00:22:32,680 Of course, to do this effectively, you need to really pay attention and remember what 287 00:22:32,680 --> 00:22:38,680 you're told, store those little threads for later. 288 00:22:38,680 --> 00:22:45,320 So anyway, was there ADHD diagnosis done there in Belgium? 289 00:22:45,320 --> 00:22:47,400 Two things have happened now. 290 00:22:47,400 --> 00:22:52,440 You have communicated to the other person that you were listening and paying attention, 291 00:22:52,440 --> 00:22:57,760 but you've also gently pivoted away from a dying topic and into one that might be more 292 00:22:57,760 --> 00:23:00,880 fruitful and interesting. 293 00:23:00,880 --> 00:23:05,600 Rather than it feeling like you're flitting from one shallow talking point to the next, 294 00:23:05,600 --> 00:23:12,320 though, it will seem as though the conversation is naturally developing and deepening. 295 00:23:12,320 --> 00:23:19,000 One way to make sure this is happening is with, surprise, surprise, questions, but questions 296 00:23:19,040 --> 00:23:23,040 that probe a little deeper each time. 297 00:23:23,040 --> 00:23:28,280 So your first question might be about the plain facts and details of who lives where 298 00:23:28,280 --> 00:23:30,920 and how old they are. 299 00:23:30,920 --> 00:23:36,080 The next time you pick up this thread, though, you can ask about how people felt about these 300 00:23:36,080 --> 00:23:38,040 details. 301 00:23:38,040 --> 00:23:40,200 What do they want to do next? 302 00:23:40,200 --> 00:23:41,920 Why? 303 00:23:41,920 --> 00:23:48,960 What does all this suggest about their values, their sense of meaning and purpose? 304 00:23:48,960 --> 00:23:55,080 Note that you can do all this without it feeling like you're grilling them or hunting out juicy 305 00:23:55,080 --> 00:23:57,360 gossip. 306 00:23:57,360 --> 00:24:01,880 Start by sharing a little something of yourself to set the tone. 307 00:24:01,880 --> 00:24:09,760 For example, you know, looking back, I've wondered if maybe I had ADHD as a kid. 308 00:24:09,760 --> 00:24:15,120 On the other hand, I'm not sure whether being diagnosed back then would have changed who 309 00:24:15,120 --> 00:24:18,880 I am today, you know? 310 00:24:18,880 --> 00:24:24,600 The thread continues, but it's deepening and gathering meaning as it goes. 311 00:24:24,600 --> 00:24:30,240 You could do this with every one of the four threads above, even returning to certain ideas 312 00:24:30,240 --> 00:24:33,160 days or weeks later. 313 00:24:33,160 --> 00:24:35,600 You're weaving that fabric. 314 00:24:35,600 --> 00:24:41,280 Without them even realizing it, the other person may start to find you trustworthy and 315 00:24:41,280 --> 00:24:48,840 relatable, all while feeling that they are talking about themselves. 316 00:24:48,840 --> 00:24:54,240 In real life, skilled conversationalists tend to practice conversation threading without 317 00:24:54,240 --> 00:24:56,280 even knowing it. 318 00:24:56,280 --> 00:25:00,480 But if you're the sort of person who gets anxious about being on the spot with nothing 319 00:25:00,480 --> 00:25:07,240 to say, conversation threading may be just the thing to come to your rescue. 320 00:25:07,240 --> 00:25:11,880 Here are a few ideas to make it even more effective. 321 00:25:11,880 --> 00:25:18,200 As you listen, prick your ears for words that suggest a strong emotional component for the 322 00:25:18,200 --> 00:25:20,160 speaker. 323 00:25:20,160 --> 00:25:26,920 Pull out particularly vivid images or unusual turns of phrase, or notice when the speaker 324 00:25:26,920 --> 00:25:33,000 gets a little more animated, and zoom in on that topic. 325 00:25:33,000 --> 00:25:37,080 It's likely going to be the most interesting thread to pursue. 326 00:25:37,080 --> 00:25:45,120 Note, it's a bad idea, however, to pull on a thread where the emotion is obvious avoidance 327 00:25:45,120 --> 00:25:47,080 and discomfort. 328 00:25:47,080 --> 00:25:52,200 It's a quick way to be perceived as nosy or a bully. 329 00:25:52,200 --> 00:25:58,160 When asking questions, keep them as open-ended as possible. 330 00:25:58,160 --> 00:26:03,480 So you have a brother, might literally be something to fill the silence, but it can 331 00:26:03,480 --> 00:26:11,440 only be answered with, yep, which then promptly leaves you just where you started. 332 00:26:11,440 --> 00:26:17,440 Don't put the other person in the position of having to think of things to say. 333 00:26:17,440 --> 00:26:23,440 As you listen for threads, don't be in too much of a hurry to pounce on them or forcefully 334 00:26:23,440 --> 00:26:30,760 steer the conversation, just relax, be patient, and hold on to them. 335 00:26:30,760 --> 00:26:36,980 Even better if you can remember them for long after the current conversation is over. 336 00:26:36,980 --> 00:26:42,940 You will come across as attentive and aware and will win major conversational brownie 337 00:26:42,940 --> 00:26:43,940 points. 338 00:26:43,940 --> 00:26:50,580 Hey, I had a new client from Belgium yesterday, and he reminded me about your brother. 339 00:26:50,580 --> 00:26:54,020 How's he doing, by the way? 340 00:26:54,020 --> 00:26:58,860 People who find conversations difficult are usually no less interesting, intelligent, 341 00:26:58,860 --> 00:27:04,220 or kind than people find this kind of socializing easier. 342 00:27:04,220 --> 00:27:09,420 The only difference is that they are unaware of the practical skills required to have a 343 00:27:09,420 --> 00:27:16,220 great conversation, or else they know what to do but are out of practice. 344 00:27:16,220 --> 00:27:21,540 At first, using the techniques and tricks outlined in this book will feel a little awkward 345 00:27:21,540 --> 00:27:28,580 and uncomfortable, but over time and with practice, you will internalize a deeper mindset 346 00:27:28,580 --> 00:27:34,060 shift, and these behaviors will start to be second nature to you. 347 00:27:34,060 --> 00:27:40,380 Keep relaxed, keep listening, and keep the focus on the other person, and you can't go 348 00:27:40,380 --> 00:27:43,860 too far wrong. 349 00:27:43,860 --> 00:27:49,380 The bigger mindset shift that will come about by using conversational threading is one of 350 00:27:49,380 --> 00:27:51,980 non-resistance. 351 00:27:51,980 --> 00:27:59,500 This means that when people introduce a thread, you listen, you are open and receptive, and 352 00:27:59,500 --> 00:28:01,500 you remember. 353 00:28:01,500 --> 00:28:07,620 You never forcefully cling to one thread over another, but stay relaxed and spontaneous 354 00:28:07,620 --> 00:28:14,820 in the moment, waiting to see what interesting things bubble up and following them. 355 00:28:14,820 --> 00:28:20,700 This is the kind of thing you need to experience rather than read about, though, so it's best 356 00:28:20,700 --> 00:28:23,740 to try these techniques for yourself. 357 00:28:23,740 --> 00:28:29,660 In particular, notice when you have a fixed idea of what you want to say or where you 358 00:28:29,660 --> 00:28:33,220 want the conversation to go. 359 00:28:33,220 --> 00:28:38,060 Notice if you're being resistant or forceful when it looks like the conversation is going 360 00:28:38,060 --> 00:28:42,100 elsewhere, then choose to let it go. 361 00:28:42,100 --> 00:28:47,820 If you quietly rehearse things in your head, or keep forcefully bringing the conversation 362 00:28:47,820 --> 00:28:55,300 back to the point you want to make, the conversation will sputter out or die. 363 00:28:55,300 --> 00:29:00,020 This is why we need to be brave enough to enter into conversations without being too 364 00:29:00,020 --> 00:29:01,780 prepared. 365 00:29:01,780 --> 00:29:07,060 If we have too fixed an idea of how things should go, we're not really listening for 366 00:29:07,060 --> 00:29:15,540 opportunities for it to be something better. 367 00:29:15,540 --> 00:29:21,660 Alright listeners, that wraps up our exploration from Conversation Skills Training by Patrick 368 00:29:21,660 --> 00:29:22,660 King. 369 00:29:22,660 --> 00:29:29,740 Remember, the key to having great conversations is to focus on the other person. 370 00:29:29,740 --> 00:29:33,900 Make them feel heard, valued, and supported. 371 00:29:33,900 --> 00:29:38,180 By using the techniques we discussed today, you'll be well on your way to becoming a 372 00:29:38,180 --> 00:29:40,500 social butterfly. 373 00:29:40,500 --> 00:29:44,980 For more tips and tricks on social skills and personal development, head over to our 374 00:29:44,980 --> 00:29:52,460 author's website at bit.ly-slash-pk-insulting or subscribe wherever you listen. 375 00:29:52,460 --> 00:29:56,980 Thanks for joining us today, we'll see you on the next episode of Social Skills Coaching.