Alright, Steve Palmer here bringing another Lawyer Talk Q-A-A.
Speaker:Session. And if you haven't tuned into these and
Speaker:subscribe to Lawyer Talk podcast, you should, because what we're doing here is
Speaker:answering legal questions, things that come up not only in my day to day law
Speaker:practice upstairs, but also on the podcast and on the Blitz nine, nine, seven.
Speaker:The idea is to give you access to answers
Speaker:to questions without having to listen to the entire podcast.
Speaker:Now questions are coming in, as I said,
Speaker:not only upstairs in my law practice, and what I'll do sometimes is I'll take a
Speaker:question that I get on the phone from an actual client or somebody who wants to be
Speaker:a client, and I'll change the names and the identities to protect the innocent, so
Speaker:to speak, and then use it as a question down here.
Speaker:Also at Lawyer Talk podcast. Com.
Speaker:We get questions fairly routinely.
Speaker:You can go to Lawyer Talk podcast. Com.
Speaker:There is a form you use.
Speaker:I get the email and you can submit your question that way.
Speaker:And as always, if you have a legal question that requires legal assistance or
Speaker:you just want to chit chat, give us a shot.
Speaker:614-224-6142.
Speaker:Not that you're going to need the number, but it may be a good idea just to put it
Speaker:on your phone in case you do ever experience unexpected trouble.
Speaker:Now to the question for the day.
Speaker:It so happens.
Speaker:And I've said this on the podcast.
Speaker:If you listen, I'm working on lots of appellate work these days.
Speaker:This is where people have been convicted
Speaker:by trial by jury, otherwise, sometimes just a judge,
Speaker:and now they want to appeal their conviction and try to get it reversed.
Speaker:I am talking here today about something called a direct appeal.
Speaker:This is where you're challenging the legal
Speaker:mistakes, the errors that occur during your trial at the trial court level.
Speaker:And the question I got
Speaker:yesterday as I finalized an A pellet brief for a client was basically this will the
Speaker:Court of appeals get all the records and the exhibits and everything else that was
Speaker:done at the trial court level, and the answer is generally yes.
Speaker:What happens is at the trial court level.
Speaker:When we start an appeal, we request the
Speaker:court reporter that's the person who's in charge of either recording the proceeding.
Speaker:Sometimes it's just audio or video now, but often it's a stenographer upfront,
Speaker:taking shorthand of everything that is said and done.
Speaker:We request that individual to
Speaker:submit the record to the Court of appeals, and the record includes not only
Speaker:everything that was said and done on the record, getting recorded
Speaker:in the courtroom, but also the things that were filed.
Speaker:So pretrial motions, entries, decisions out of the judge,
Speaker:anything that was submitted and included in the trial court record.
Speaker:Usually you can even see that online these days.
Speaker:This also would include exhibits.
Speaker:So if the defense offered an exhibit or
Speaker:the prosecutor often exhibit, and the jury got to see that exhibit or take it back.
Speaker:Or even if not, it typically becomes part of the record that gets transmitted.
Speaker:Now, this is important because anything on direct appeal has to be raised only based
Speaker:on things in the record, only based on things that are there.
Speaker:If there's mistakes made out outside the record, saying your Attorney's office or
Speaker:strategic decisions that weren't really strategic or just general failures out of
Speaker:your counsel, or maybe you got a brand new witness that showed up after the trial.
Speaker:These are things that do not come up on direct appeal.
Speaker:There's something different for that.
Speaker:It's called post conviction.
Speaker:We're not getting into it today.
Speaker:But with respect to the direct appeal, all the record items have to be transmitted.
Speaker:And the other reason this is important is because in the context of an appellate
Speaker:brief and the one I'm working on now has a page limit of 25 pages.
Speaker:It is a very complicated case with
Speaker:multiple legal and technical issues relative to the admission of evidence, the
Speaker:admission of expert testimony and general mistakes made by trial Council.
Speaker:It's very difficult to raise all this in only 25 pages and do it thoroughly.
Speaker:You can sometimes ask for additional
Speaker:page length, but we want to try to avoid doing that.
Speaker:The Court of Appeal says, look, we don't
Speaker:like long brief, so let's not give them a long brief.
Speaker:Sometimes there's no choice, but we try to stick within the rules.
Speaker:Now, that doesn't mean we can't reference
Speaker:things that are in the record, and that's exactly what we do.
Speaker:We use the appendix sometimes just to
Speaker:duplicate things that day, being the Court of Appeals could go see in the record.
Speaker:And other times we we just cite the record
Speaker:and we direct the Court of Appeals to the source material we're relying on as we
Speaker:make our arguments in the case I'm working on.
Speaker:There's some complicated expert reports in the page limits.
Speaker:I have it's hard to duplicate those or
Speaker:even take excerpts from those and still stay within the limit.
Speaker:So what we do is we either put them in the
Speaker:appendix or we just cite them from the record.
Speaker:And that way the court has access to it.
Speaker:So as you're working with your attorney or
Speaker:Appel lawyer, these are good questions to ask.
Speaker:And what I always try to do is get a draft in advance to my clients of what I'm
Speaker:raising the issues that we're presenting for the Court of Appeals to consider, and
Speaker:even if it's just a day or two in advance just to let them know, hey, look, here's
Speaker:what we're doing here's, why we're doing it, and here's how we're doing it.
Speaker:And that's, in fact, how this question came up for my client this week.
Speaker:Anyway, on direct appeal, you raised in summary, only things that are on the
Speaker:record, not things that are outside the record.
Speaker:We're looking for legal mistakes.
Speaker:We're looking for decisions judges made in response to objections.
Speaker:Maybe they excluded evidence, maybe they permitted evidence.
Speaker:They shouldn't have anything along those lines.
Speaker:That's what we're looking for on direct appeal doesn't mean that other stuff
Speaker:cannot be raised, but just not on direct appeal.
Speaker:Now, one final comment.
Speaker:If you do lose your direct appeal, let's say you lose.
Speaker:And this is Ohio we're talking about.
Speaker:There's also a pellet work in federal courts.
Speaker:Again, beyond the short bite that we're taking here out of this topic.
Speaker:But if you lose, then you go to the Ohio
Speaker:Supreme Court and you ask the Ohio Supreme Court, and I say, ask them to review it.
Speaker:They don't have to.
Speaker:So the first step is to say, hey, look, Ohio Supreme Court, this is a great issue.
Speaker:It's got a broad scope.
Speaker:It's got big constitutional issues.
Speaker:There's conflicts of legal decisions here in Ohio.
Speaker:We need you to resolve it.
Speaker:If they agree, if they think it is
Speaker:important or they do need to resolve something, then they agree to review it,
Speaker:and then you submit a brief on the merits of it.
Speaker:Now, if you win in the court of appeals,
Speaker:it's probably worthy of comment to discuss what happens if you win.
Speaker:Most of the time.
Speaker:They just send it back to the trial court and say, hey, you guys screwed up.
Speaker:You didn't do this right here's.
Speaker:The mistakes you made.
Speaker:This person gets a new trial, or this
Speaker:person gets a new sentencing hearing or whatever the remedy would be.
Speaker:In very rare cases, there's insufficient evidence for some legal reason.
Speaker:Or maybe the verdicts were just so far afield from what the evidence showed that
Speaker:the court appeals just says, you know what?
Speaker:This is against the manifest way of the
Speaker:evidence, and we reverse it, and then you just get discharged in the case is over.
Speaker:That's a rare bird, though most of the
Speaker:time, if you went in the court of appeals, you go back to the trial court and you get
Speaker:a do over and you get a retrial, hopefully this time with better success.
Speaker:So anyway, if you have your own questions
Speaker:about Apple work or anything else, just give us a shout.
Speaker:614-224-6142 likewise, Ohio Legal Defense.
Speaker:Com that's the Aegean Almer website. I know it's funny.
Speaker:It doesn't say Abagnale. Com.
Speaker:It says Ohio Legal Defense. Com.
Speaker:But there's some reason for that.
Speaker:Go to Ohio Legal Defense. Com.
Speaker:Send us an email if you have some
Speaker:questions or concerns about your own legal matter.
Speaker:If you just want to talk about podcast
Speaker:questions, you can go to Lawyer Talk Podcast.
Speaker:Com.
Speaker:And if you want your own podcast, it's probably worthy of mention.
Speaker:Just go to channel. 511.
Speaker:Com down here in the studio.
Speaker:Lots of people are starting to sign up for podcast.
Speaker:I think it's becoming.
Speaker:And we thought this a year and a half ago
Speaker:or two years ago, but now it's really becoming the next greatest thing.
Speaker:Everybody wants a podcast and everybody
Speaker:out to have one, and it ought to sound awesome and come with great production.
Speaker:We can help. So this has been Lawyer Talk a Q.
Speaker:Amp a with Steve Palmer, as always, off the record.
Speaker:But on the air with your questions, at least until now.