Speaker:

Greetings, friends. My name is Jess McLean, and I'm here to provide you with some Blueprints

Speaker:

of Disruption. This weekly podcast is dedicated to amplifying the work of activists, examining

Speaker:

power structures, and sharing the success stories from the grassroots. Through these discussions,

Speaker:

we hope to provide folks with the tools and the inspiration they need to start to dismantle

Speaker:

capitalism, decolonize our spaces, and bring about the political revolution that we know

Speaker:

we need. Welcome to Blueprints. Can you introduce yourself, please? Dalia, can you go first?

Speaker:

For sure. I'm Dalia Deryawad. I'm a member of the Legal Support Committee. I'm a Palestinian

Speaker:

organizer based here in Toronto. And I'm Rachelle Friesen. I'm also part of the Legal Support

Speaker:

Committee for those that have been criminalized for Palestine solidarity and located here in

Speaker:

Toronto. For those that have been criminalized for Palestinian solidarity, I... That is a

Speaker:

growing number, is it not? And we don't even just measure that by the amount of rests that

Speaker:

we're going to talk about and the treatment by the Toronto police and the media and whatnot,

Speaker:

but. Just the act of criminalization and the language of criminalization just absolutely

Speaker:

surrounds Palestinian solidarity work, doesn't it? And just the way you phrased that, I imagine

Speaker:

that you forgot your hands full then. If that's what you folks are doing. Rachelle, can you

Speaker:

maybe give me an idea of the scope? Because let's just set the stage. I'm on Twitter, X,

Speaker:

whatever, and I'm getting enraged. There's folks out there trying to imply that the police haven't

Speaker:

cracked down on all of these disruptive protests. and terrorist supporters. They're very upset

Speaker:

about this, that not enough resources have been spent policing you folks. I imagine you've

Speaker:

got something to say about that. You want to give us a broad idea of just what Toronto police

Speaker:

have been doing in relation to Palestinian solidarity work? Sure, I mean. I think when we talk about

Speaker:

criminalization, the first arrest took place on October 30th, 2023, and 13 people were arrested

Speaker:

and given trespass tickets on that day. There's been a few other trespass tickets since then,

Speaker:

but we don't actually count them because really that has not been the trend moving forward.

Speaker:

That's sort of like the first and last day we really got trespass tickets after that day.

Speaker:

Everything escalated to charges. So since October 30th, TPS has arrested and charged 93 people.

Speaker:

Now, some of them have been charged twice for like two different events, who we lovingly

Speaker:

call two timers. And some of them have multiple charges for the same event. So we don't actually

Speaker:

know the total number of charges laid against arrestees. But that number, like because that

Speaker:

number would be far larger than 93. So that's just the very basic numbers. And I think. At

Speaker:

first, when, like I said, arrest happened, it started with the trespass. And then within

Speaker:

a couple of weeks, it moved to folks getting a lot of mischief charges. And then it went

Speaker:

to mischief or unlawful assembly while wearing a mask. And most recently, it has moved towards

Speaker:

assault of a cop. Those seem to be the most frequent charges. And so that's sort of how

Speaker:

it's progressed. in terms of the last year, in terms of charges. And I think otherwise

Speaker:

in terms of trends, most, when we started off in the fall, most arrests were happening on

Speaker:

site. Which makes sense for a trespass charge, right? Yeah, and then what we see come January,

Speaker:

and I would say this also happens as the hate crimes unit gets more funding because they

Speaker:

get an increase of funding as well in January and you get the surveillance structure coming

Speaker:

in on top of the city. In January, we start to see an increase in phone calls and people

Speaker:

getting called to turn themselves in after the fact. And then come March, phone calls seem

Speaker:

to be very predominant. And then what we start to see is before perceived escalations of actions,

Speaker:

we have an increase of those phone calls. So like ahead of April 15th, where there was an

Speaker:

international call out for escalation, we had three people get arrested. the beginning of

Speaker:

May when everyone was wondering, will there be an encampment? Is the encampment starting?

Speaker:

U of T is putting up fencing. But is there an encampment happening? And the week where that

Speaker:

is suspected to happen, we get the phone calls of three different people from three different

Speaker:

events to turn themselves in as well. And we have seen that throughout. So we knew as the

Speaker:

Legal Support Committee, end of September, beginning of October, is going to be a sweep of people.

Speaker:

And I think it's what we had. And so we grew our committee at that time. So we would be

Speaker:

able to provide more support. But those are some of the trends we're seeing. And I'll hand

Speaker:

it to Dahlia for things that I might have missed in that in that trends and in that data. Yeah,

Speaker:

I mean, I don't think you've missed anything. I mean, I think one piece I'll add on is, is

Speaker:

the conditions that we've seen for folks. So those have kind of escalated as well. We have

Speaker:

seen bail conditions. Yeah, so after folks have had charges laid against them, their bail conditions

Speaker:

have escalated in nature. So we have conditions, non-association has been relatively common

Speaker:

for folks arrested together or for the same event, which means you cannot converse without

Speaker:

the presence of counsel. And then there are... We had some folks who had a protest ban placed

Speaker:

on them as a condition, which then got dropped once their lawyers went to court because it's

Speaker:

a clear violation of folks' charter rights. And then there are also regulations that are

Speaker:

restrictions of being five, that arrestees cannot be 500 meters, like they can't be within 500

Speaker:

meters of specific locations. So I think those are just. you know, some of also the added

Speaker:

forms of repression or, you know, criminalization that people have faced and often people's,

Speaker:

you know, attorneys will challenge conditions. Thus far, some non-association charges have

Speaker:

been dropped, but not all, so, you know, it's because of the large number of arrests that

Speaker:

varies. I'm gonna link a few episodes back to this one because we did talk to Ms. Squasson

Speaker:

about... her bail conditions and how they were impacting her based on her arrest. And we spoke

Speaker:

with Anna Lippman about the being charged while masked, adding that additional charge. So it's

Speaker:

no wonder Rochelle says like the number of charges is likely so much higher because we find cops

Speaker:

or the crown adding charges after arrest or. you know, trying to just make the issue more

Speaker:

complex than it is. Just one thing to add, I feel like Rochelle, maybe you've mentioned

Speaker:

this or not, but I think we've also, one of the trends that we've tracked is a bit of public

Speaker:

outcry related to how police respond to a thing. So like how people respond on Twitter and like

Speaker:

what does Ionist's response for that does impact that specific piece of like how much criminalization.

Speaker:

and folks protesting the genocide receive. And I think that's also a piece of like TPS's interests

Speaker:

being very closely linked to folks that will have power and hold capital and hold power.

Speaker:

And so, you know, I don't think this is shocking to say that the police's interests are not

Speaker:

those of the general public, but those of capitalist interests and the state itself. It's not shocking,

Speaker:

but I'm not sure we quite. think of their actions being dictated in the same way politicians

Speaker:

are. I think we forget that. We assume, although they are an oppressive tool of the state, the

Speaker:

fact that they are led by public outcry. Just for as I think sometimes just doesn't jive

Speaker:

with us because no matter how much public outcry we seem to make There doesn't seem to be the

Speaker:

same response but I want to unpack a few of the things that you folks have mentioned and

Speaker:

Although it's maddening to hear the escalation of police tactics, clearly they saw, you know,

Speaker:

trespassing charges were not going to deter anyone and then mischief charges were not deterring

Speaker:

anyone. Even when we pair that with really oppressive bail conditions and, you know, holding them

Speaker:

for 24 hours, you know, taking them to separate stations, they tried all kinds of things to

Speaker:

just make it as stressful as possible. not just on like any activist, they're typically organizers,

Speaker:

folks who are leading these actions or planning them or, you know, allegedly doing what they're

Speaker:

doing. And so it's very tactical on their behalf, but it also is a sign of how relentless the

Speaker:

movement has been, right? Because surely, well, maybe you should folks should answer this,

Speaker:

but. Do you feel like it has had the effect the police are looking for? Because now you're

Speaker:

at the point where folks are getting charged with assaulting police officers. That is a

Speaker:

completely different charge, right? It looks different in print. The consequences are much

Speaker:

more severe. Also, it's my understanding that all of these charges are also being investigated

Speaker:

for hate crimes. You know, and publicly so. You know, we are also investigating these for

Speaker:

hate crimes is the phrase that will actually come out of the police officer or the police

Speaker:

release. And it'll accompany the name, age of those charged. I think it's important to note

Speaker:

at this point, and you could correct me if I'm wrong, no one has been convicted of any of

Speaker:

these charges. And I think that's like when we talk about. There's the psychological element,

Speaker:

there's the physical element of people getting beaten by the police, and then there's also

Speaker:

the material part. The fact that every Palestine, anyone that's arrested in support of Palestine

Speaker:

gets investigated by the hate crimes unit. That gets published through TPS and then it just

Speaker:

gets regurgitated by mainstream media. No one has been convicted, but what that does effectively

Speaker:

do is... It creates an atmosphere where doxing can happen. So people then getting tormented

Speaker:

online, people have had their employer called, people have lost their jobs. This is all I

Speaker:

would say very intentional. I know, so for example, I was arrested at some point. I know there

Speaker:

was a press release that came out that said it's being investigated by the hate crimes

Speaker:

unit. I had to tell my employer this. Now I'm very lucky that my employer supports me, but

Speaker:

that's not a comfy thing to do to be like, I'm being invented. You should know this is what's

Speaker:

happening and this is how it's going to be spun. And while the state has continued to try to

Speaker:

escalate either through listing charges online, weird charges. Someone the other day was arrested.

Speaker:

for taking a flag off a vehicle and somehow that made mainstream media, an Israeli flag

Speaker:

off of a vehicle and that somehow made mainstream media. But what it's trying to do is completely

Speaker:

dehumanize this movement that is ultimately trying to stop a genocide. Right? And I think

Speaker:

the state keeps thinking the harder they crack down, the more they surveil us, the more they

Speaker:

harass us. We're going to be scared into our homes to not do anything. But there is a genocide

Speaker:

going on. Um, I don't, I do not see people slowing down. I do not see people stopping. Um, because

Speaker:

yeah, there is it. The ultimate struggle is to stop the genocide and what is going on in

Speaker:

Palestine and in Lebanon, um, and to that people are just going to continue. Yeah, and I think

Speaker:

I will also just to build off of that, I think there is something to be said about the mask

Speaker:

falling more intensely or purposefully or what have you more starkly when it comes to the

Speaker:

Canadian state and the Canadian state is a settler colonial project and its loyalties are with

Speaker:

the settler colonial state of Israel. And you see that very clearly like the TPS is intended

Speaker:

punishment is because the earlier forms of escalations they had against people who were protesting

Speaker:

this genocide were not deterrents. They did not serve the purpose. They had it, so they

Speaker:

kept escalating in the hopes that would make people stay home and hide and be afraid. But

Speaker:

like Rochelle said, the stakes are so high, the stakes are either a genocide continues

Speaker:

or we put a stop to the genocide. And so when people look at it that way, they don't want...

Speaker:

Even folks from... who've been arrested and who are dealing with these charges and who

Speaker:

we've spoken to as the Legal Support Committee, they're not deterred. On the contrary, they

Speaker:

want to highlight the insanity of what has been the media coverage of this and what has been

Speaker:

the TPS response to this. People have been so severely docked that for a few individuals,

Speaker:

their addresses have been shared online, like their home addresses. These are people who

Speaker:

have not been charged of anything. Like you said, nobody's been convicted.

Speaker:

It's showing very clearly that the media regurgitates what the police is saying right now. And we've

Speaker:

been kind of entering a place where the media is refusing to do its due diligence to ask

Speaker:

the side of the arrestees or the side of people in the movement who are doing this work. And

Speaker:

they have received, I think prior to October 7th, the Toronto Police Chief. did a whole

Speaker:

presser about the quote unquote effectiveness of TPS. And that's the thing, TPS is using

Speaker:

this criminalization to show its effectiveness when in reality it has not been a deterrent.

Speaker:

And in response, there was a statement that was put out that was debunking all the lies

Speaker:

that he put out. And there was a media contact person put out with that release. And the media

Speaker:

did not pick it up at all. And they ran with the TPS's false narratives, even though there

Speaker:

were parts of it that were lies. And that's often the case. And I think we've seen that,

Speaker:

you know, at one point after March, the March 30th protest of land day when, you know, TPS

Speaker:

brutality was in full display, because people on the ground were covering it and taking videos,

Speaker:

the media covered it well, with the press conference that came after. And then from that point onwards,

Speaker:

it was like, there was my assumption not backed by anything, is there were some type of unspoken

Speaker:

directive of do not cover anything unless it comes from a police officer's mouth. And that

Speaker:

is what we have seen. The fact that the media hasn't covered the fact that their protest

Speaker:

ban conditions is wild. Like you'd think they'd run with that, but instead they're running

Speaker:

with the flag story. And so like the fact that they ran with the narrative that somebody was

Speaker:

trying to flee the country when that wasn't the case is also wild. Like they just keep

Speaker:

running with these stories. And then a good example, a recent one is like on September

Speaker:

11th, when there was the violence outside of a police station. The only reason the media

Speaker:

began to cover that was because police reported quote unquote minor injuries when we've had

Speaker:

we had eight people go to hospital with serious injuries. So just to say that like It's not

Speaker:

that the tactics are not working as intended. They're having the opposite effect on the movement

Speaker:

because people can very clearly see that the Toronto police are the arm of the state and

Speaker:

the state is a settler colonial state that will not stand like will not do anything willingly.

Speaker:

There is no appealing to the morality of settler colonial states and so I think like an unfortunate

Speaker:

silver lining is that the brutality has like and attempts at criminalization have highlighted

Speaker:

that so clearly at this point in time, particularly a year into this. And I think just to jump

Speaker:

off of that, there was this amazing press conference that really spoke back to the violence that

Speaker:

was received on land day. And again, since then, it's been silent. We did a criminalization

Speaker:

of dissent press conference on June 17th. It was beautiful. It was amazing. We got no coverage

Speaker:

from it. There were two other press conferences this summer, specifically around TPS. either

Speaker:

doing consultation or their tactics. We might get a camera there, but it won't go to air.

Speaker:

We have written statements that, for example, there was a press conference for around the

Speaker:

Indigo Kills Kids, and we brought up the beating at 51 Division and state repression. What's

Speaker:

happening with Indigo is just an extension of this whole state. Anything that criticizes

Speaker:

TPS has been very, very hard to get into the media, which is why we're starting to ask a

Speaker:

lot of questions because the 51 division beating was one of the biggest police beatings of the

Speaker:

public. And that is who we are. We are the public. There were hundreds of people outside 51 division.

Speaker:

It was the biggest police beating of the public since the beating at Lamport Stadium back in

Speaker:

the summer of 2021. And who covered it? And instead what we are seeing is these manipulations,

Speaker:

right, of situations. So they have their TPS press release, then you have media just regurgitate

Speaker:

it, maybe change a few words around, word for word. And that's where you also get like, for

Speaker:

example, back in May at the encampment, there was a marshal that was arrested at the encampment

Speaker:

and the Toronto Star originally published, now they eventually changed it. information from

Speaker:

the press release about how this person had been previously charged in January over the

Speaker:

overpass. But what they didn't include was that person's charges were dropped because the judge

Speaker:

had said that there was not enough evidence to convict this person. And yet they didn't

Speaker:

publish that part in the media's mind. And in TPS, what they did was like, oh, this person's

Speaker:

at the encampment. See, not only did they cause problems here, they caused problems back in

Speaker:

January and published what they were charged with, but not that there was no, there was

Speaker:

no stands for that. Or you think about like, in terms of my arrest, I was arrested, I was

Speaker:

arrested at the airport. I did not know there was a warrant out for my arrest. I was going

Speaker:

to the US for two days to visit a colleague of mine. It was US immigration that informed

Speaker:

me of my arrest and handed me over to TPS. And what does Demp Q do? He makes a statement saying,

Speaker:

this person was left trying to leave the country, which then CTV originally ran with this person

Speaker:

was trying to flee the country. Now we got a retraction printed on that because I was very

Speaker:

angry. But this is the manipulations that are happening. So yeah, like when you folks say

Speaker:

people aren't deterred, that isn't to say they

Speaker:

I don't want, and I never want to scare people away from doing that work, and I'm so glad

Speaker:

to hear that people aren't. But this has real psychological impact on people, and materially.

Speaker:

You've already mentioned people are losing their jobs. We've heard folks having to change addresses,

Speaker:

you know, for the very reasons you've talked about, either doxing or never knowing when

Speaker:

the cops are looking in at them. And this... Let's talk a little bit more about the tactics

Speaker:

too that play into that psychological impact. Let's talk about the turn-ins to start because

Speaker:

there's going to be listeners who have no idea what that is. You mentioned it just briefly

Speaker:

when you were talking about the trends, how they used to arrest people on site and now

Speaker:

we're finding you know sometimes months later. So you've gone to a pretty innocuous action,

Speaker:

a sit-in perhaps, with a mask on. and months later, right as you're in the thick of organizing

Speaker:

an escalated action likely, right? The cops know these significant dates for us. You are

Speaker:

starting to get phone calls to turn yourself in. And Rachelle, when I spoke to you earlier,

Speaker:

you told me about these turn-ins and... you know, cops don't have a warrant to come get

Speaker:

you. They'll say, you know, come turn yourself in. And at first I say, you know, are people

Speaker:

listening to them? Because I was just like, fuck you, come get me. I'm in a different circumstance.

Speaker:

OK, so that was me not really thinking of other people in that moment. I said, you know, are

Speaker:

people actually listening? And you're like, well, yeah, because the alternative is when

Speaker:

they do get a warrant or you might not even know and you're at the airport or they'll come

Speaker:

to your work to pick you up instead, which is hella awkward. maybe they'll come at like four

Speaker:

and five o'clock in the morning and kick the door in like we've seen. And so can you explain

Speaker:

a little bit about what leads up to these requests to turn ins and just you did a great job either

Speaker:

one of you just maybe you've experienced it yourself but to give folks an idea of what

Speaker:

people experience before they actually get arrested or turn themselves in. maybe start us off.

Speaker:

And I think also just kind of to what you're saying, like, yes, people aren't deterred.

Speaker:

And like you said, people are feeling the impacts of this, like, like Rochelle said, it's psychological,

Speaker:

it's physical, it's material, like these things should not be. I can't even think of the word

Speaker:

in this moment, but like they should not be under categorized or made light of because

Speaker:

those impacts are very real and the punishment. that the state is trying to impose on people

Speaker:

is very severe. And that is the point. So with the turn-ins, I think there are different ways

Speaker:

in which we've seen like TPS surveillance and harassment taking place, against people protesting

Speaker:

this genocide. One of them, when we have like asks for turn-ins, there's the Toronto police

Speaker:

calling folks on the phone, asking them saying like, you know, come in, we have a warrant

Speaker:

for you, we wanna arrest you for this specific thing. And what they will have is a form 10.

Speaker:

And a form 10 is what you get when you are released, when you're released and leaving post having

Speaker:

had charges laid against you. And what the police should be doing is getting a warrant for your

Speaker:

arrest and then giving you a form 10. So the police are skipping a step. and willy-nilly

Speaker:

doing whatever they want because they can get away with it. And people don't always have

Speaker:

like we've there's been I don't know what a form 10 is. I have no fucking clue. And that's

Speaker:

the thing, like the distinction between the two is something that we've been working on

Speaker:

educating folks like in the movement about because and educating the public about it, because

Speaker:

you wouldn't know that when police come. door knocking at your house or when they call you

Speaker:

on the phone that you should ask, like, do you have a warrant for my arrest? And that's the

Speaker:

first question you should ask. And someone had a really great response for that when the police

Speaker:

door knock them is they and Rochelle was on the phone with them as this was happening.

Speaker:

But they knocked on their door and the police ask the person asked the police, do you have

Speaker:

a warrant? And the police were like, dancing around the question. They're like, it's a yes

Speaker:

or no question. Right. There are like, what if they just say yes? You're like, oh, okay.

Speaker:

They have to show you the warrant, you know, you have to say it's like the movies. Exactly.

Speaker:

And so if they don't have a warrant, really you can like make them get the warrant. This

Speaker:

is their job. But sometimes it makes sense because people don't want to wait for the warrant.

Speaker:

If there is, if you, if you have kids in your house and you don't want the police to raid

Speaker:

your home, that's a real concern. Like it can be very traumatizing for folks who've had their

Speaker:

homes. raided in the hours of like during dawn, early morning, 5am, 6am, their kids were traumatized

Speaker:

as they saw parents cuffed or parents were traumatized as they saw kids cuffed and brutalized. And

Speaker:

so- For posting, posturing indigo. Not just indigo. So we've had home raids outside of

Speaker:

that as well, where it was like the children being arrested in the home and the parents

Speaker:

being forced to sit as this entire raid was happening in their home. And so like, it's

Speaker:

been for different, you know- forms of protests that have happened, but just to say that it'll

Speaker:

come much later, it'll be a scare tactic in a form to harass you. And sometimes it's a

Speaker:

type of information gathering because they don't really, like getting a warrant is having a

Speaker:

judge say that, yes, there's enough here to charge this person with these things. Whereas

Speaker:

without that, you're saying like, the police are making the decisions on their own. So I

Speaker:

think those are some of the distinctions to be made is like they have, they're operating

Speaker:

with quite a bit of free range and they're like running with it. And asking those questions

Speaker:

is kind of trying to have your own back a little bit. But it's not to say that they won't get

Speaker:

a warrant later. It's just to say that if you have the ability to wait, and there is also

Speaker:

quite a bit of anxiety and stress and depression and hypervigilance that's associated with waiting

Speaker:

on a warrant. Because they don't care about you. They're not going to, with Rochelle, for

Speaker:

example, they did not inform her when a warrant was issued for her arrest. really trying to

Speaker:

fuck with people and it works because leaving people in a precarious state where they don't

Speaker:

know where they stand, like once you've been charged with a thing, things start moving forward.

Speaker:

But if it's hanging over your head as that this may or may not happen, this may happen after

Speaker:

the action or it may happen three months in advance, you're leaving people in the movement

Speaker:

in a perpetual state of anxiety and stress and that's intentional because you never know what's

Speaker:

Yeah, maybe I'll leave it there and pass it over to our shell. I know I went on for quite

Speaker:

a bit of time. Well, I was just going to say, like, and I think that's also sort of like

Speaker:

part of design of their plan. Right. So like, it is our right to wait for an arrest warrant,

Speaker:

which sounds strange to say in and of itself. But like executing that right to wait until

Speaker:

you have an arrest warrant will just will create additional anxiety and stress in your house.

Speaker:

or in your home when already there is the whole entire surveillance of the state. So like people

Speaker:

have reported to us of police cars parked outside of their buildings or outside of their homes,

Speaker:

of suspected police vehicles. People have been followed home from protests. People have been

Speaker:

followed going for a walk in the park. People have been followed going about their daily

Speaker:

life or have experienced harassment, either because they're being followed or like you

Speaker:

go for a drink downtown and you walk out of the bar and what do you know? There's somebody

Speaker:

there from a bike cop from 52 is on his beat and he recognizes you from a protest. So why

Speaker:

wouldn't he take the opportunity to harass you on a Friday night? Like the violence that is

Speaker:

like the psychological pressure. and the violence that the TPS is trying to enact on us. It's

Speaker:

very intimate at this point. They're outside of our homes. They are inside of our homes

Speaker:

sometimes. They are calling us. They are door knocking us. They are following us. They are

Speaker:

yelling our names out from their cars as we, our names out from their cars as we walk down

Speaker:

the street. But again, I like what... It's not stopping us. We are gonna keep going. And I

Speaker:

think it's also just really important to highlight in these moments. And this is like part of

Speaker:

abolition, right? Is the strength of the community, right? So like 93 arrests, we have a community

Speaker:

of people and we've been in touch with every single one. And if we aren't in touch with

Speaker:

them for whatever reasons, we're in touch with their family members to make sure they are

Speaker:

okay. People are showing up for each other to do jail support. People are showing up, like

Speaker:

I've said before, like gift cards for food delivery. You don't generally cash them in. You just

Speaker:

send them along in other directions. Like the community love. Yeah, the community love is

Speaker:

like, we know we are on our own in this city. We know we're getting doxxed. We know we can

Speaker:

be doxxed online. We know we can get harassed in the street. We know people are getting death

Speaker:

threats as well in the movement. And it is very clear, as we all know, the police do not keep

Speaker:

us safe. In fact, they are the leading cause of us being unsafe. But we have built such

Speaker:

a strong community of love and support where nobody is left behind. Can we please talk more

Speaker:

about the support pods? Because... when you talked about them before, that was the real

Speaker:

silver lining to the discussion. Because as you're talking about all of this, like my blood

Speaker:

is boiling and I'm making faces. How come I'm going, oh, I'm so mad hearing all of this.

Speaker:

But this isn't to scare people again, right? We do want to air this stuff. But before we

Speaker:

get to the support pods, I want to go back to that paranoia a little bit. Because, you know,

Speaker:

hearing Rochelle. It sounds like paranoia to somebody who is oblivious to what's going on,

Speaker:

right? Like someone totally outside the movement who thinks cops are just the good guys still.

Speaker:

They, I think, would be like... Of course, they're outside your house. You live in the city. There's

Speaker:

cops everywhere and you're imagining it. And to a degree, that is part of it as well, right?

Speaker:

So you know it's happening. You see it happening, but you can't ever even confirm it. Like some

Speaker:

of them are phone calls. You know you're getting phone calls from cops or like they're yelling

Speaker:

your name. But then there's those other times when then now you're looking at like every

Speaker:

car sideways and heaven forbid we start looking at each other sideways, because we've been

Speaker:

picked up What they do when some people are picked up is try to turn them, you know, and

Speaker:

so Yeah, like the psychological impact that it has on the individual but then How they're

Speaker:

trying to make us change who we are and how we operate Right into something we don't want

Speaker:

to be so rather than becoming paranoid and, you know, ramping up security so tight that

Speaker:

people can't enter the fray anymore, right, from the outside. You folks have found a solution

Speaker:

of sorts, a solution, a mitigation, support pods. Tell me more. Tell us more about those,

Speaker:

that community support that is so necessary under this kind of suppression. I mean, I can,

Speaker:

like a... Just one piece to add to like what you're saying, like we have had several arrestees

Speaker:

report that when they were in custody, they've been spoken to by Chris, who is a cop inviting

Speaker:

them to be a confidential informant and to quote unquote, let TPS know if their comrades are

Speaker:

up to anything or quote, if they are here of anything that could be a risk to public safety

Speaker:

end quote. So just to say- Wait, wait, did you say Chris? Like do we have, is this his name

Speaker:

Chris? Oh, he says, we don't know. His name is Chris. It's like the most basic name. Do

Speaker:

we have a photo of Chris? We do not. And it's just like, it's like the basic name that's

Speaker:

picked, but it's been Chris. Oh, it could be a different name. Okay, I gotcha. Yeah, like

Speaker:

it could be like five different dudes being Chris, but anyways. So, and I will say that

Speaker:

like, just, I think one of the things to, like, when we're looking at these tactics and these

Speaker:

arrests, like one thing is to divide. people in the movement doing this work and make them

Speaker:

distrustful of one another and turn us on each other. Another piece is to isolate people and

Speaker:

make them so they're in silos. And one thing that we in the work that we do is like, we

Speaker:

focus on movement lawyers and there's a question of who is representing folks who've been arrested.

Speaker:

And that's because You know, all these charges or these charges are criminal charges. And

Speaker:

some criminal lawyers response to their clients is do not talk to anyone, do not say anything

Speaker:

until this ends. And that is not the approach of a movement lawyer. And a movement lawyer

Speaker:

will make sure that you are still surrounded by community and you are not isolated from

Speaker:

the work that you were doing. Um, that really is for most of us, you know, very important

Speaker:

to us. Like we don't feel like we're happy to be sidelined and not be able to. work to end

Speaker:

this genocide. And that's not a thing that like sits well when the state is coming down on

Speaker:

you to be like, and now I'm out. And so the support community is to make sure that we're

Speaker:

bringing folks together who've been arrested and providing them the supports that they need.

Speaker:

And so there are different supports that we provide for people. One is connecting them

Speaker:

with attorneys. Another is connecting them with other arrestees, knowing and announcing. you

Speaker:

know, that the only criteria here is that folks have been charged. So this isn't necessarily

Speaker:

a secure type of setting. But you when you talk to other people, you kind of combat the gaslighting

Speaker:

that the state is putting us under, because when you're like, oh, like this, this happened

Speaker:

with me or like, you know. So having those things can help kind of with the psychological impact

Speaker:

that these things have. I think some people who've been arrested have been. organizationally

Speaker:

affiliated, so their organizations have had their backs, but then other folks have not

Speaker:

been. And so we've tried to make sure that there are individuals around those people so they're

Speaker:

not falling through the cracks. And so there isn't a question. Everyone's receiving support

Speaker:

regardless of the social capital they may have. And another piece is, which is a gentle plug,

Speaker:

if we may, is the Toronto Community Justice Fund, which is to support people materially.

Speaker:

So if you have $5 to spare, please, please donate because the money... in that fund is going

Speaker:

to our steeze. And for some people it's covering their rent. For some people it's replacing

Speaker:

doors that have been knocked down for the police. And for others, it's helping with lawyer fees.

Speaker:

So just to say that that's something that is really essential because the material piece

Speaker:

of all of this is, you know, very, very present. I just want to say, if you go in the show notes

Speaker:

for this episode, that will be the top link. under the reference materials that you see

Speaker:

there for the Toronto Community Justice Fund. So we'll make it as easy as possible for folks

Speaker:

to donate. Because I know like we don't want to talk about the material impact, because

Speaker:

when you're talking about stopping a genocide, and it's the same thing when we talk about

Speaker:

the impacts to activists, all of them have said the same thing, like as Rochelle did before

Speaker:

we started recording, like I don't want it to be about me and my bail conditions. And when

Speaker:

we're watching what we're watching and. We're, you know, horribly inspired by the. the courage

Speaker:

it takes to be in Gaza right now, you know, and the people fighting as part of the resistance.

Speaker:

And so it pales, it seems, you know, to talk about it, but it's still real. It's still real.

Speaker:

It could act as a deterrent if we didn't have these safeguards in place. But as I hear you

Speaker:

describe it, and I don't know why it didn't occur to me earlier, it's like the Toronto

Speaker:

police realize they are making like a tight-knit club of organizers that have been through hell

Speaker:

and back. and have endeared themselves to one another and like that are come up with terms

Speaker:

like two timers as though Like in you're an elder now as opposed to someone that needs

Speaker:

to you know Lay low and be ostracized because you've been criminally charged and it's like

Speaker:

it's having the opposite effect I know it is having that real effect on people but In general,

Speaker:

they're just stoking the fire. And that happens as you delegitimize the state, right? They

Speaker:

don't realize that their actions are actually fueling their demise. So this kind of planning,

Speaker:

this kind of organizing is so important. Is there anything else you want to add about like

Speaker:

the community supports that you do, because it was hard to watch that 50 that 51 division

Speaker:

beating that Rochelle talked about that was jail support for a previous action. And we

Speaker:

talk about that on the show. Like you've got to do jail support. You've got to be there

Speaker:

when your comrades are released. You you have to be there while they're inside. Like police

Speaker:

need to know that there is people waiting for them to. hold them accountable. And so that

Speaker:

matters to them. It matters to the individuals inside. And so to see them come out and beat

Speaker:

the people who were on jail support, that was really hard to see. Not that all of it isn't,

Speaker:

but I don't, what other kinds of support should people be prepared to have, you know, like

Speaker:

maybe a spare room, a spare bed for the odd folks that need to. relocate or is there anything

Speaker:

else that you found yourself needing that maybe weren't so obvious to you at the beginning

Speaker:

that you've had to kind of develop support systems for? I mean spare rooms, spare beds are always

Speaker:

useful for folks because even um like even if you're in a if you're in a constant state of

Speaker:

hypervigilance um it's not even necessarily that there is an actual threat. But if you

Speaker:

can't actually calm your body down in the environment that you are in, we've often recommended to

Speaker:

folks like, just like go to a friend's for a couple, like remove the air valve from the

Speaker:

situation so that the hyper, so when you come home, you can actually like know what is threat,

Speaker:

what is not a threat. And I think like something that is starting to be built is like, people

Speaker:

providing because our movement is, it's dynamic. It's not monolithic. We have healthcare practitioners

Speaker:

in our movement. We have lawyers in our movement. We have mental health practitioners in our

Speaker:

movement. And so we do have therapists that do pro bono therapy and debrief sessions for

Speaker:

folks. We definitely have healthcare practitioners that will advise people on how to get documentation

Speaker:

of injuries. or something like 51 division. And so like, that's sort of like also part

Speaker:

of the beauty of our movement is that we are, there are so many skills and everyone is providing

Speaker:

what they can as they can, so that we can keep going. And yes, we're all a little, we've all

Speaker:

aged a lot in the last year. We've all learned a lot in the last year. But none of us are,

Speaker:

none of us are sidetracked from what is actually happening and the genocide that is happening

Speaker:

that needs to be stopped. Yeah and I think to like to build off that like one piece that

Speaker:

I would say is to focus is to like diversify their support and by that I mean like don't

Speaker:

I mean like it's great to have one person that you're very close with but talk to multiple

Speaker:

people that you trust and love and who If it's don't like, and I say this because different

Speaker:

people will say different things to you and they can get help give you perspective. And

Speaker:

it's, that's always helpful. I also will say that like, it's a good grounding to know that

Speaker:

like settler colonialism and the state are more brutal when we are effective and they are not

Speaker:

brutal and a vacuum. They have a vested material interest in supporting the genocide. and they're

Speaker:

not going to let go of that material interest reluctantly. They're going to be made to let

Speaker:

go of it. And so it's not a situation of like, I think we've used every possible way of framing

Speaker:

why the Canadian complicity in this genocide needs to end. It's not about saying it better.

Speaker:

It's not about like, it's been said, it's been made clear. Like all these things have been

Speaker:

done. There are reasons they're trying to also like do this is I think it's scary for the

Speaker:

state to see. Like I think Palestine ends up being scary because it brings people in from

Speaker:

various sectors. You have writers, you have artists, you have lawyers, you have mental

Speaker:

health professionals, you have parents at the TDSB and the PLL district school board and

Speaker:

every district school board around mobilizing students and university and it is showing that

Speaker:

there is. a united front against a settler colonial project. And so then it raises the question

Speaker:

for the state of what does this mean for the settler colonial state of Canada? Because if

Speaker:

everybody's uniting against the end of a settler colonial project in the Middle East, what will

Speaker:

that mean for the structures that exist here? And what does that mean for the capitalist

Speaker:

class that has been profiting off of indigenous genocide here? And I think I realize I'm going

Speaker:

broader than the TPS, but just to say that, like, the state is backing the TPS. Like we've

Speaker:

I know we haven't really touched on Project Resolute and the coordination of RCMP with

Speaker:

OPP, with TPS, with the federal government, with all the things. But just to say that settler

Speaker:

colonial states are sinister and the reason they use violence is because they can't fight

Speaker:

ideas with anything more than violence. And that's what they're doing right now. And the

Speaker:

insanity is the idea that they're fighting is that genocide is bad, which should be a no-brainer.

Speaker:

Genocide is bad. Like, I don't. you know, don't do genocide. I, anyways. And to the state,

Speaker:

that's a controversial statement, which just is because it's a state that was built and

Speaker:

is built on genocide. So. The reality is, it isn't a controversial statement. It's what

Speaker:

you just described behind it. And we have plans for the Canadian Seller States, so no wonder

Speaker:

they are afraid, because this is working up. into exactly what we need for a political revolution,

Speaker:

right? All the sectors coming together, working together, learning how to maneuver through

Speaker:

these state institutions that are also adapting at the same time. So it's not even like a trial

Speaker:

run. It really is a fight against imperialism largely, right? Like I think at the beginning,

Speaker:

I didn't want to correct Rochelle when she said like, the ultimate thing is stopping the genocide.

Speaker:

And it was like, yes, that is the most pressing thing. But we know that will lead to so much

Speaker:

more, right? That we start to destroy the imperialist machine altogether. So the fact that they are

Speaker:

seeing these parallels and understanding, and let's just hope everyone within the movement

Speaker:

is understanding it too, right? Like that they're not just going to stop the genocide. They'll

Speaker:

free Palestine and then we will free ourselves, right? Which is why we also see more crackdowns

Speaker:

on like indigenous protests here in Canada. So like on... I know podcasters can't see this,

Speaker:

but Canada Day, oh, fuck that day. There was the protest that was where indigenous folks

Speaker:

traditionally go and walk to the water. They were told that they would not be able to do

Speaker:

that because of Palestinian protesters in the crowd. We saw this during River Run. clutch

Speaker:

my pearls, children heard from Turtle Island to Palestine, occupation is a crime, and we're

Speaker:

seeing increasing crackdowns on Indigenous solidarity. There is even things like there was a protest

Speaker:

back in August, which was a protest to be in solidarity with Tyler, who is Indigenous and

Speaker:

shot by the police. And on Twitter, people said it was Palestine activists shutting the city

Speaker:

down again. Um, and so we're seeing this connection because it's all the same shit disturbers everywhere.

Speaker:

We can't keep track of the things we're trying to stop and they don't understand solidarity,

Speaker:

right? It's so perplexing for them that you act as one movement, right? They need to label

Speaker:

it and the most explosive label possible right now is Palestine, but Dahlia You brought up

Speaker:

Project Resolute. It's not even in my notes to talk about, but I don't know why I was just

Speaker:

so angry about TPS, and this is TPS, but it's grown beyond that from what I understand from

Speaker:

previous discussions with people, Rochelle. Can we talk about how that, so folks might,

Speaker:

was it the breach? It was the breach. The breach, I believe it was the breach, we'll link the

Speaker:

article, wrote a piece on Project Resolute. But at that time, it was primarily just Toronto

Speaker:

Police Services, I believe. And it ties in also with the other story we talked about where

Speaker:

inside the Attorney General's office in Ontario, there is a committee tasked with advising police

Speaker:

and I imagine they are all wrapped up in Project Resolute or at least it's all one giant piece

Speaker:

of the puzzle right um what do you know about that now and Because it's gone beyond just

Speaker:

Toronto, right? And I'm glad that we're sharing this. And although 93, I imagine Toronto's

Speaker:

been the hardest hit in terms of police oppression. But like, I have no idea. Montreal, McGill,

Speaker:

there were a lot of arrests. Like, do you have comparable figures? This must be replicated

Speaker:

in other urban centers at the moment. To some degree? I don't have a sense of those statistics,

Speaker:

to be honest. I think... There have been different things that we've seen early on, and we saw

Speaker:

in Calgary specific responses of police. And I also will say part of the way in which they're

Speaker:

operating with Project Resolute is like cloak and dagger secrecy. And there isn't clarity

Speaker:

on who's doing what and who's coordinating with who. And the pieces that are clear is that

Speaker:

policing forces across different... you know, regardless of whether it's federal or provincial

Speaker:

or local, police forces are coordinating with one another as to how to respond and the respond

Speaker:

to what? To the Palestine movement. To suppress it. Yes. How fucked up does that sound? I mean,

Speaker:

insane, but. For what? OK, you know. No, but I think it's a fair question. I mean, and so

Speaker:

like the they're coordinating with each other to. suppress this and then also there are parts

Speaker:

that are like the federal giving orders to local police as to how to respond and then like or

Speaker:

the city council doing that and like different ways of decisions being made that are less

Speaker:

about like yeah I mean I think it's like I think it's again like one of those pieces that the

Speaker:

there's also coordination. I mean, I'll speak more locally, but there's like we know that

Speaker:

there's coordination between the Crown and the police, for example. And so like the Crown

Speaker:

and the Toronto police. Yes. And that has and so I just to say that it's like all these types

Speaker:

of coordination is just to say that like the state is coordinating in all its levels. We

Speaker:

don't have the details of that. But in reverse, we're trying to coordinate on our side to make

Speaker:

sure that we have each other's backs, because that's as much as we can do. And I will say

Speaker:

that also in terms, there are questions that are, I know maybe Rochelle can speak to this

Speaker:

a little bit more, but one of Israel's biggest exports is testing tactics on Palestinians

Speaker:

and then exporting it to policing in countries like so-called Canada. And so that is another

Speaker:

piece of it, of like our tactics. I mean, my assumption. is that tactics that are being

Speaker:

right now used on the Palestine movement will then be used against other movements. And this

Speaker:

is important for every movement in the city because soon it'll be helping and it'll be

Speaker:

transit and it'll be everything else that people are fighting for using the same tactics. Because

Speaker:

I think it's, I mean, in thinking of a sinister, the armed force of the states, the way they

Speaker:

think, this is a good test subject. This is a good way to see. what would suppress people

Speaker:

and what would make them move away from something they are ideologically aligned with. Everybody

Speaker:

who's in this movement is against the genocide and against the settler colonial project in

Speaker:

Palestine and against imperialism. How do you, if you suppress them, then you can apply that

Speaker:

model elsewhere. That's my own theory. I haven't mapped that elsewhere, but that's what I assume

Speaker:

they're doing. Well, and we are seeing that at the micro level, the very, very small example

Speaker:

is the fucking truck at protests. The Rubble Loose truck? No, no, no. Our trucks. Oh, yes,

Speaker:

we've heard, yes. Our trucks, which like, if you've ever gone to protests here in Toronto

Speaker:

prior to 2023, we've always had speakers on trucks, like both like tech speakers, we've

Speaker:

always had people on the back of trucks. This has never been an issue. Like any parade, right?

Speaker:

And now suddenly it is a major issue. And we know what this is about. We know that like,

Speaker:

It's like strategic incapacitation where the police are finding one minor thing that they

Speaker:

can focus on that they can then gain access to our movement spaces. So the fact that they

Speaker:

need to like scrutinize the truck means that they get to enter protest spaces means they

Speaker:

get to like test out organizer discipline. Are people talking to the cops that shouldn't be

Speaker:

talking to the cops? It's all a plan for them. But That truck thing has now applied to River

Speaker:

Run. It has, I believe it applied to the Migrants' Rights March as well. Moving forward. Precedent

Speaker:

has been set. Our truck is the thing, which is so stupid. But I think also when we go back

Speaker:

to how these settler colonial states are intertwined in learning from each other and sharing things

Speaker:

from each other, there are things that get lost in sort of like the history. Um, that in like

Speaker:

2008, Stockwell day signed a public safety agreement with Israel, which would mean that Canada and

Speaker:

Israel would share information on, uh, border control, prison population, and I believe crowd

Speaker:

control. Um, so that's 2008. It was a public agreement. It was a public declaration. I believe

Speaker:

it did not go through any sort of procedure in the house. and then it was reaffirmed in

Speaker:

2015. That's still there, which means also, when we talk about links to settler colonialism

Speaker:

and fascism, when you go to Canada's website about who is a international stakeholder on

Speaker:

public safety, it's fucking Ben Giver, who is a fascist Israeli politician, who actually

Speaker:

when... Israeli soldiers were arrested for the rape of a Palestinian prisoner. This fucking

Speaker:

politician decided that he was going to break down the prison doors to release them out.

Speaker:

This is who the Canadian state has decided is a stakeholder on public safety. I'm just mouthing

Speaker:

the word trash. He's trash. Sorry. Yeah. That's even kind of. No, I will be on trash. So I

Speaker:

was. trying to look up the, there was a ricochet article that I wanted to send here in the chat

Speaker:

that was about the, it's about the Canadian police chief's meeting that they had in Halifax.

Speaker:

And one of the things, and it's really like incredibly racist and chopped up in all types

Speaker:

of different ways. They're trying to claim that police are now being doxxed online, which is

Speaker:

laughably hilarious. And like their feelings, which is just like, cry me a river. Public

Speaker:

safety officers, oh no, we know their names. Yeah, like how, yes, like it's so hard and

Speaker:

painful for them. But the part that's interesting is like one of the Ontario Provincial Police

Speaker:

Commissioner, one of the things that he says is that like individuals coming to Canada from

Speaker:

the Middle East, from Middle Eastern countries where they, where quote, the use of violence

Speaker:

is an acceptable vehicle for social change, end quote. So just to say that there's also.

Speaker:

quite a bit of racism attached to this. I know we haven't touched on it. I think it's like

Speaker:

an unspoken piece to this audience of this podcast, I assume, but like that's also alive and well

Speaker:

and underlines a lot of the narratives that TPS is funneling out to the media and that

Speaker:

the media is grabbing onto because it feeds into like an Islamophobic, anti-Arab, anti-Palestinian

Speaker:

sentiment, xenophobic sentiment that's just like these immigrants coming over, fucking

Speaker:

everything up for us. when these immigrants are saying we want to go home, but we want

Speaker:

our home to be liberated, just at least for myself. I won't speak for the rest of my people,

Speaker:

but that is an interesting piece because it just outlines also the anti-Indigenous racism

Speaker:

that the journalist who wrote that piece experienced. But I think it's just also just to say the

Speaker:

police chiefs coordinate with each other. They converse. They're not going to tell us how

Speaker:

often they collaborate, but I would assume it's a lot. Like, when you are a psychopathic fascist,

Speaker:

you need others to stroke your ego, to be like, you're a good boy, and that's what's happening.

Speaker:

And so, like, you know, sorry. I slid over to that article and I saw, like, victimized in

Speaker:

quotes, and I just had to come back to the screen because I was going to start laughing and I

Speaker:

just can't deal with cops feeling like they're victims at this point after all that we've

Speaker:

heard about their fucking behavior and their complicity. And I will say it is like also,

Speaker:

like I think it's interesting, and we've seen this happen, at least with Israel, but it's

Speaker:

like a page out of their playbook to take the narratives that Palestinians are using to then

Speaker:

as their own and repackage them. And it's like the TPS is doing the same thing where Israel

Speaker:

will be like, we are indigenous to the land. And then, but then they'll burn down the land

Speaker:

and, you know, they do their, and TPS is doing the same thing of like, our police are getting

Speaker:

like minorly injured. but also we had hospitalized eight people with like severe injuries. No,

Speaker:

like that's the asterisks to all of it. So it's just like the playbooks are being exchanged

Speaker:

with one another. I just want to note like going back to the explicitly racist comments there.

Speaker:

If you look at the mandate for the committee that I referenced earlier, and again, we did

Speaker:

a whole episode on the attorney general committee. They are tasked with examining protests that

Speaker:

center on conflicts in the Middle East. So they didn't go as far as to say Palestine, because

Speaker:

that would be super obvious and I guess they can't use the word Palestine. They're using

Speaker:

the CBC's language guide or something. But they explicitly do say that, you know, anybody trying

Speaker:

to stop conflicts in the Middle East is worth examining for hate crimes. And... You tie that

Speaker:

into the recent designation of a terrorist group, how that is expanding and how likely that will

Speaker:

then add a layer to the investigations around activists. Do you have you ever corresponded

Speaker:

with this known terrorist group? And then that adds to this hate crime level of charge that

Speaker:

could be levied. So yeah, we don't know exactly who's talking to who, but like you say, it's

Speaker:

just so obvious that it's manufactured right from the top down. And, you know, that just

Speaker:

flies in the face of all the checks and balances we're supposed to have. And I love it. Dahlia's

Speaker:

so flippin', like, they won't even tell us how often they talk to each other, but we know,

Speaker:

we know they meet up in their little caves and... plot against us, but you sound a little crazy

Speaker:

when you say it, but like it's the level to which the surveillance and the suppression

Speaker:

of our form of democracy, I say democracy, people think the ballot box, I mean, I'm assuming

Speaker:

the listeners know who we're talking about. Because when I said to you like respond to

Speaker:

what? You said Palestinian protests, but you know, they wouldn't apply this shit to any

Speaker:

climate event. An indigenous led one, sure. But if Greenpeace got, you know, I remember

Speaker:

we had a big climate march and it was huge, it was really fucking big, but we did nothing.

Speaker:

We just walked down university and we made a turn and like there was, they were the state

Speaker:

can deal with that, right? They can deal with us demanding a carbon tax or whatever the fuck

Speaker:

we were asking for at that point. I don't even remember what the point was, what the demands

Speaker:

were, but like they can kind of placate around that. But when those protests explicitly center

Speaker:

on the colonial state, right? And the questioning of that use of state violence, all of that,

Speaker:

that has to just, they've got to squash that as harshly as possible. If they know it's good

Speaker:

for them. Of course, and I will say, I think early on, like in the trends that we tracked,

Speaker:

one of the things that we were kind of highlighting or seeing is this attempt at building a specific

Speaker:

narrative of this idea of quote unquote good protesting versus quote unquote bad protesting.

Speaker:

And that was like, and not like clearly stated objective of the criminalization they were

Speaker:

doing, but it was very obvious that they were trying to send a message to everybody who was,

Speaker:

you know, coming out. against the genocide to say, here are the ways in which we're okay

Speaker:

with you protesting, here are the ways in which you shouldn't protest because we will lay charges.

Speaker:

And then that started to escalate where a lot more things face that. But that's also part

Speaker:

of why I would say like, we haven't seen so many arrests at protests, like at the mass

Speaker:

mobilizations that happen at weekends, because those are quote unquote good. But then if it's

Speaker:

a more direct action piece than that is. bad and you need to teach you that that's quote

Speaker:

unquote bad. And she's using quotes for every time she says good and bad, because I'm thinking

Speaker:

and I'm like, no, you're thinking it's the opposite. Like we love our marches, but it's called blueprints

Speaker:

of disruption for a reason. So exactly. And I think it's also just that also, you know,

Speaker:

it's like you're saying about climate protesting. It's this idea that like come out and say the

Speaker:

things, but don't actually disrupt the status quo and don't disrupt the flow of capital and

Speaker:

don't disrupt. You know, everything that's happening don't inconvenience people too much, so to

Speaker:

speak. But like, in reality, the point of protest is to be disruptive and is to disrupt capital,

Speaker:

the flow of capital and to disrupt the status quo. Because you're asking for change and change

Speaker:

does not come when we like, you know, we're not like, you can't appeal to the morality

Speaker:

of the state because they have no morality. Like They're continuing their genocide on indigenous

Speaker:

peoples of this land. What makes us think that they're going to care about the indigenous

Speaker:

people of Palestine? Like, you know, like it's not it's like, you know what I mean? It's like

Speaker:

a false equivalency. Well, every industry does. It wouldn't even be like, you know, nefarious

Speaker:

to acknowledge that point. You know, that police chiefs across Canada. I mean, if you believe

Speaker:

in police forces, they should be talking to one another in the hopes of doing their jobs

Speaker:

better. We know that's not what they're doing. I mean, it is, because they do want to do their

Speaker:

jobs better, and their job is to suppress our work, right? So, I mean, we would kind of mock

Speaker:

them if they just lived in silos and operated without networking. I mean, we don't do that.

Speaker:

No industry does. But I think just knowing that these tactics will likely just become more

Speaker:

and more normalized. the less noise there is around them, which makes you coming on here

Speaker:

to share these details so important. But it's like striking that balance between letting

Speaker:

everybody know what the cops are doing and how you could possibly mitigate it, right? Rather

Speaker:

than trying to stay in the lane they're trying to put you in, right? Because I think one of

Speaker:

the most valuable, no, I can't say that. One of the things that hit me was when you mentioned

Speaker:

the type of lawyer. And it was so black and white, like night and day there, the two approaches

Speaker:

of. maybe two different lawyers where one would say, you know, lay low, don't talk to anyone,

Speaker:

like typical lawyer advice. We've all kind of seen and heard it in the same movies where

Speaker:

you're asking for, where's the warrant? But then you say a movement lawyer and, and it's

Speaker:

not just the movement lawyer, it is the movement, right? Where we add sunlight to things and

Speaker:

we are accountable to each other and we are open facing as much as possible. And so Yeah,

Speaker:

no, just mentioning that, like, it's a logistical thing. Like, when you get arrested, don't just

Speaker:

call any fucking lawyer, right? Like, know that there are two different approaches you can

Speaker:

definitely take. One is beneficial to the movement as a whole. One may protect you a little bit

Speaker:

more. But in the end, it's arguable, right? It's arguable whether trying to deal with this

Speaker:

on your own and trying to, you know, just avoid those charges altogether is probably not in

Speaker:

your. best interest either. But it so back to the balance, I go on tangents, that's the ADHD.

Speaker:

But it's a you want to share this, you want to share this, but you don't want people to

Speaker:

be scared. Right. So before I let you folks escape, do you have anything you could share

Speaker:

with the audience who have heard all of these things? They are mad. But you know, at the

Speaker:

same time, we've planted a kernel of what you could likely expect. Should you engage in any

Speaker:

meaningful way. So other than the kind of practical steps that you've provided, you know, in terms

Speaker:

of forming community support, having legal support, a know your rights education within circles,

Speaker:

you know, is super important and adapting that to like practicality, like you'll have rights

Speaker:

that are in the constitution and on paper, and then you'll have the way the police are applying

Speaker:

things. Because even like good or bad protests, that is shifting. You know, apparently Spider-Man

Speaker:

costumes on awnings, like that became a no-go all of a sudden. As you said, things just added

Speaker:

to it. You'll have people saying, be safe, don't get arrested when you go out. And you look

Speaker:

at them and you're going, I don't know what they arrest people for these days. That's changing

Speaker:

all the time. Like, okay. Like that's just not even practical anymore. So what can you say

Speaker:

to folks that, you know, we're thinking like, I wanna go out, I don't wanna get arrested.

Speaker:

I mean, I think there are a few things to say. I think, like you said, I think there are know

Speaker:

your rights that are really helpful and important. to, you know, information is power here and

Speaker:

to equip yourself with what you can do to protect yourself is important. You know, ways to protect

Speaker:

your devices, you know, wearing masks, doing these things is important, but also I would

Speaker:

say there are a few things. Like I think the number of 94 is scary and though it's not like...

Speaker:

The state is coming after people and the state is not arbitrarily arresting people. The movement

Speaker:

has had tens of thousands of people in it and the number is large, but the people who have

Speaker:

not been arrested are larger. And so that's an important piece to highlight is like they're

Speaker:

coming after people and not because of who they are individually. That's a piece that like

Speaker:

often when we connect with the RSDs we say like we'd say to them is like. This is very personal

Speaker:

in that it's happening to you and you're the one that they're charging or trying to charge

Speaker:

with these things. However, it's not about you at all. It's them trying to make an example

Speaker:

of you more broadly. And so you, and it's dehumanizing in that you no longer are an individual in

Speaker:

that manner, but just to say that like they're doing this because they're trying to see what

Speaker:

will freak people out. And again, the more knowledge we equipped ourselves with, the safer we can

Speaker:

be to also, once there's an attempt to criminalize somebody, if you've done your due diligence

Speaker:

and you've tried to have your own back, then a lawyer will take over and they'll have your

Speaker:

back. And so I just think that there's quite also a bit of resources behind the movement

Speaker:

and people who have set up structures to make sure that we are supported in the work that

Speaker:

we're doing. And so I think that those are maybe the things that I would, I would. badly folks

Speaker:

with. And I would just echo everything that Delia has said. And the thing is, is like,

Speaker:

94 is a lot. But that means we also have a very vibrant community of care for each other and

Speaker:

with each other. And I would say like, it's not the general, it is tens of thousands of

Speaker:

people that are part of this movement. and only 94 have been arrested. Are we expecting more?

Speaker:

Of course we are. And if that happens, will you be invited to this community of care and

Speaker:

support and love? 100%, you will be a part of that. You will not be alone in this. And I

Speaker:

know the state and how TPS releases these individualized reports, how the state individualizes your

Speaker:

case, how they make it seem all individual. We continue to push back and be like, no, you're

Speaker:

not alone. We are part of a collective. And that's just sort of part of the movement. There's

Speaker:

something so inherently powerful in that where I just feel a little braver hearing it, honestly.

Speaker:

And Ms. Squastin had similar sentiments that really kind of stayed with me on, you know,

Speaker:

when she left being arrested and was greeted with like smokes and her favorite snacks. And...

Speaker:

it sounds like so small of a gesture, but in that moment where it did feel like all about

Speaker:

you and you're probably doing everything you can to not freak out because you don't want

Speaker:

to give the cops an inch and but internally it's so much stress and then just to know that

Speaker:

isn't you know something you have to face with on your own and even to think of it as a community

Speaker:

joint to make a such a positive out of it. I thank you so much. for doing that kind of work,

Speaker:

for taking that on. I was so disheartened when I asked Rachelle, like, do you think, you know,

Speaker:

eventually you'll be arrested too, perhaps just because you're doing the work that you're doing,

Speaker:

not even necessarily the action they've arrested you for, you know? And I expect it. And that

Speaker:

made me mad. That made me mad that someone that's doing this work had to resign themselves to

Speaker:

that. and had to just operate with that in the back of your mind, but that neither of you

Speaker:

have let it daunt you at all. I hope that gives our listeners the courage they need if they

Speaker:

needed it. So thank you both very, very much, not just for coming on the show, which I totally

Speaker:

appreciate you taking the time out to do because... We will try to boost this as much as possible.

Speaker:

People need to be talking about this, like especially the investigating for hate crime. I can't believe

Speaker:

the media didn't really pick up on that point. You named a couple other points that should

Speaker:

have been blown up and that you folks spent time focusing on. But for me, that one is so

Speaker:

it's out there with every release. They don't even need somebody to tap them on the shoulder

Speaker:

and be like, hi, they're doing this. Like they are getting that information with every press

Speaker:

release. And they must surely go, well, why is it being investigated for a hate crime?

Speaker:

I don't know. And they just keep rolling. Right. Or they do know and they're not saying anything.

Speaker:

So thank you for amplifying this too on top of the work that you do supporting, acting

Speaker:

as legal support for those folks. And again, it's the Toronto Community Justice Fund that

Speaker:

we are going to link at the very top of our show notes if anybody has anything that they

Speaker:

can donate to that. Please do. But thank you Dahlia. Thank you Rochelle. Yeah. Thank you.

Speaker:

That is a wrap on another episode of Blueprints of Disruption. Thank you for joining us. Also

Speaker:

a very big thank you to the producer of our show, Santiago Halu-Quintero. Blueprints of

Speaker:

Disruption is an independent production operated cooperatively. You can follow us on Twitter

Speaker:

at BPofDisruption. If you'd like to help us continue disrupting the status quo, please

Speaker:

share our content and if you have the means, consider becoming a patron. Not only does our

Speaker:

support come from the progressive community, so does our content. So reach out to us and

Speaker:

let us know what or who we should be amplifying. So until next time, keep disrupting.