Welcome back to Data Driven, one of the top 100 AI
podcasts where we navigate the ever evolving world of data
science, AI, and engineering. This week, Frank
and Andy are joined by a powerhouse in the AI and data
space, the amazing Lillian Pearson. As a globally
recognized AI growth strategist and author of the data and AI
imperative, Lillian shares her journey from professional engineering to
data science to fractional CMO and how she's leveraging AI
to revolutionize growth marketing. From breaking down the barriers
of early data science gatekeeping to the rise of agentic AI,
this conversation is packed with insights, wit, and a healthy dose
of industry reality checks. So buckle up for an
episode that proves why data driven is a must listen in AI.
Hello and welcome back to data driven the podcast where we explore the
emergent fields of data science, AI,
and data engineering. And with me this week is my most favoritest
data engineer in the world, Andy Leonard. How's it going, Andy?
Going well, Frank. A little cold, but well. A little cold.
Well, it is, if it's cold by you, it's absolutely freezing
by me. I think we're down about two or three degrees colder than you. Plus,
we're on top of the mountain. Right. Mountain and just a
very generous term. Yep. Hill, I suppose, the West Coasters
would call it. But today, I'm super excited. And do you know why?
I know why. But tell our audience why you're
super excited, Frank. Our guest today is someone I wanted on the show for a
little while now, but we couldn't make it work. She lives on the other side
of the planet, but she's kind enough to have it here. Our guest today
is Lillian Pearson, a global authority on AI
driven, growth. She's the author of this book, The Data and
AI Imperative, and she's actually written a bunch of other books
and LinkedIn materials. In fact, her LinkedIn learning
course on, foundations of data science or something like that was one
of the first courses I watched way back in the day. I
was in the Microsoft office in K Street
watching, watching these courses, because it was
pretty clear that the, front end client development was
ending. The world was changing there. I didn't wanna be part of it anymore. I
wanted to switch into data science following your decade long,
sales pitch to me to get into the field. And the thing that made
Lillian's course awesome Great. Was yeah. She's got a
blush now. So if you're watching well, the thing that the thing that made her
stuff awesome was, like, she was the first not,
like mathematics or like MIT PhD person. Like she was the
first real and approachable person to do this. Although I
didn't know what PE stood for, I thought it stood for Princeton educated because
at this time, right, like everybody who was doing data science content was
a PhD. They said, you know, you gotta get a PhD. You gotta get degree
in this. And this is, like, 2014, '20 '13. Right? So, like, that They
were so gatekeeping. I mean, they were, like, Absolutely.
They were, like, you cannot come in. This is our gold
mine. Yes. Thank you. So welcome to the show, Lillian. No. You're absolutely
right. Like and and, like, they don't and even even, like, the the well meaning
people were gatekeeping. Right? Like, so, like, when I went to, one of the
advantages of working at Microsoft is you you are kind of behind the firewall. I
don't know what it's like now, but back then it was like that. Right? So
I was able to, like, talk to Microsoft researchers working on stuff. And I
would go to them and say, hey. You know, what do you what's your advice?
Like, this is my career dilemma. And they'd be like, well, this one guy, smart
guy, he's like, just go back to school and get a PhD. Right? Like, you
know, in this. And, like Just just go get a PhD. Like, you and me
would go to, like, 07:11 and pick up, like, a coffee or, like, a Slurpee.
Right? Like, just go pick one up. And, like, I heard that. To be
fair, Frank, to be fair, you and I both know a lot of
very smart people. And I know what a PE is, and
I know fewer professional engineers than I know
PhDs. Yes. That is true. So when, like while I
first thought it stood for Princeton educated. Right? Because at the time, this is a
very gatekeep field, like you said, Lillian. And what worried me is I went to
Fordham University. So I can only imagine the two letters behind my
name, and that was a joke. Well,
the PE actually it does it means
something. It means something and it wasn't easy to get. And I
gotta tell you, I think it just I went to
college. I took, you know, like I was saying, like, I took thermodynamics.
I took linear algebra. I took differential equations. I, like,
got an engineering license, but I mean, degree. But then you have to work for
four years under a PE and build
systems in order to get someone to sign off that you
have done this work so that you can then sit for another exam four years
later and have like, it's like taking the board exam to get this. So I
did all of this and it was like something I, I was more
like, okay. So I, I completed the journey. It took eight years
to do this. So that's probably why you see less one
of the reasons why you see less PhDs than PEs. But,
then I got this this license, which I love, and it
gives credibility. And I think that's important. But,
my husband, who is
actually a software engineer, so a software developer.
He's just like, why are you even maintaining this thing? Because
it's, for environmental engineering. So am I building
environmental systems or doing anything related to that anymore
and not at all. But I still earned this license. And to
me, it means something. So thank you for saying all that
because I, I like the validation.
To me, I think this means something. Come on. It counts. That's a lot of,
like, it's years of your life. Like, that's not trivial. I mean, that's like I
mean, that's like being a, like, a cardiologist. Right?
Like, you know? It was a lot a lot of work, and I have to
maintain it. I have to do every continuing education every two
years and all this stuff. I'm keeping I'm gonna do that even though I'm not
building sewer systems or Right. Air pollution stacks or
whatever. You know? That's fine. Whatever. No. No. I
wouldn't knowing what that is, it's I you know, I I
have more respect. I don't have a little amount of respect for
PhDs. I have a lot of respect for people who go through that education and
that process. It's not trivial at all, but I have more respect for
professional engineers. Yeah. So you're the first,
PE to be on the show. So that's something And they should count it.
Like, people like, oh, you have a master's. Can you you have a master's? Like
and I'm like, actually, no. I don't have a master's. I have a PE, but
people don't know what that is. I'm like, well, that's okay.
Anyway. Sure. Well, it became famous in The States. I don't
know what it's like, or or when exactly you left The US, but but
there was a court case, I think, in Oregon. There was an argument
over, something to do with the traffic light. There's something to do with
the traffic light. Yeah. So I remember this. So there was something to
do with the traffic light, and I guess, I I don't know the details of
the case. I'm sure Google I do. Oh, you do? The
the PE's wife, was charged with
running a red light. And he argued that
the yellow light didn't stay yellow long enough. Based on the
speed limit, and he did the math. He went to court and the
court. Hey. He he won his argument,
but the court didn't accept it. And they ended up appealing, and I'm
not sure exactly what happened on appeal, but I believe he did win on appeal
because the judge wasn't aware of what a p e was.
And they're like, No way. You know, the state certified that guy,
you know, as good as math. Okay? And other
things. So when he showed the math that there was no way she could have
stopped, Maybe. But the the, you know,
the fact that he he did the math and that wasn't accepted by the
court cause that's what caused the story. Yeah. That was a thing. Like, wait a
minute. Like, there he was a PE, and then everybody's like, what's that? Like,
so, so, like, not not I didn't know it took eight years,
but, like so it it definitely deserves more respect, in
the world than than I think it gets. That's okay. I don't even need it.
I'm not even, like, doing a technical role anymore,
really. Although it does help to have that background. Well, I mean, what are you
up to? Yeah. What are you up to? I couldn't even be to cut you
off. No. No. No. We had met on, like, a coaching call or something like
that. And because I think I reached out to you for career advice many, many
moons ago, like, and, you were like,
you know, I was like, but for me, the blocker was the math, like, getting
my head around the math. And this is, like, going on ten years ago. Yeah.
We got over all of that. Yeah. Oh, yeah. Yeah. Yeah. I mean, we're on
if I'm on the other side of the mountain now, you know, like, so, like,
at the time, you know, because you were like, oh, the math isn't wasn't really
a problem for me. And that's when I found out you were a PE. And,
and then I was like, oh, okay. Because but you were like, the coding was
the blocker. And I'm like, well, that's funny for me. The coding is not an
issue. The math was. Right? So it was interesting
because I think to your point and I'm sorry, Andy. We'll we'll get to your
question. Oh, it's okay. I'm just fanboying out. Right? So, like,
the, it's interesting how as a disciplined
data science right now, now I think the market's a little different because there's a
lot of experts out there. But, and
for those listeners, they didn't really see the the the wink at when I said
expert or the air quotes. But there were a lot
of disciplines kind of coming together that really formed data science. Right? You had kind
of the math the mathematicians, you had the coders, and then you had the subject
matter experts. Is that what you saw? Because you were in the game
at least three, four years before I was. Is that how it
started? Yeah. I mean, there were
statisticians who didn't that were, like,
essentially, filling the requirements of a data scientist, but then they would
call in the subject matter experts, that they
needed. And then there were yeah. I
mean,
I I had to hire. You know? I had to, like I was growing my
business, and I started in 2012. And I needed to hire people to
help me with requirements, and they needed they needed to basically be
data scientists. And there were no there were no
data scientists. So what I would have to do is I would have to take,
like, what one type of expert did, what another type of
expert did, and assimilate it into this thing that kind of
like a little bit of a Frankenstein in order to make it work.
Because there weren't and now it's so different. Now it's like, the market is
actually flooded. I mean, you can find people and it's, like, super easy, and it's,
like, all over the place. Like, if you go to Upwork, like, every job is
AI job. I'm like, this is not what it was. Let me tell
you a point. No. It's true. Like, people
forget. Like, when I made a decision to abandon kind of, you know, the the
front end development, GUI type stuff I was doing
and go into this direction. Even my wife who is a technologist,
right, but we're also a two engineer family, right,
was like, so you wanna study you wanna be an
actuary? Like, what what are you gonna do with this? Like, and and
in her defense, like, you know, ten, eleven years ago, this was
a risk. Now, fortunately, I backed the right horse after
after backing wrong horses a number of times, Silverlight,
Windows Phone, Windows eight. Right? So, you don't
have to get it right all the time, but you do have to hit it
once. Right? So now I think that's a good segue into what are you up
to now? Because I think what you're up to now, obviously, I have the book,
which is a really good book. I I haven't finished it yet, but,
I think you for getting it. I wish I had a good time your
review copy. Yeah. Well, that's your score. No problem. I
think I saw a post from you. Like, you said preorder it now, and I
was like, oh, I'll just preorder it now. And then it came,
like, right around New Year's. So,
very good book. I like the approach. But, so Andy
can ask his question or I can repeat it, but what are you up to
these days? Well,
I am acting I work as a fractional
CMO or I work as a growth adviser
and, strategist for
technology companies. So, actually, I'm not. I have done a
lot of work with b to b companies as you as you know, but I
have also the b to c, experience as
well as ecommerce d to c, marketing
experience. So I have just gone full throttle,
because I I had a role as a CMO
in 2022 for a data
SaaS company, a spreadsheet company. And as you know, I've
been advise advising founders and doing marketing, like, since
the beginning. So, like, that my first role in the data space was
even marketing, actually. So, and I grew
from there until, like, I got this job as a CMO, which I
thought was a bad word. I couldn't believe you wanted to call me a mark
marketing person. I was like, I like, put call me, like, chief product officer.
He's like, yeah. But my my investors are gonna like, they needed you
to be named for the function that you're doing, and you're doing a chief
marketing officer. And I would I didn't even know I was doing that. So then
I got that job, and I was so I gotta say I'm really good at
it. I've trained, like, ten years and spent over a hundred thousand dollars. Like, I
really this is, like and I didn't even know that's what it was called. And
once I did that, and once I saw, like, it was, like, then I
knew. So I so I've been doing ever since. And I just,
the data consulting, that was one of the reasons with the data and AI imperative.
It was important to me to, one, up level help, like, up
level, like, the execution people, the implementation data
people that kinda wanna move into leadership to help them, like, to share that
strategic thinking. And the other part of it was, like
because the strategy advising work I did as a, day
data strategist, like, I charge like, I was able to make a thousand
dollars an hour for that work, and I don't offer it anymore.
And what I basically wanted to do was just give away
the keys to the kingdom in terms of how the the process I use
to actually build these technical strategies. So I've been building
technical strategies for twenty years since I graduated
college as like my first job. Yeah. So anyway.
Interesting. So that's what I did with the book and it's a segue. It's basically
my coming out party is like, as a growth leader.
Which so as you as you'll see, like, the first half of it is very
much into product led growth, growth marketing, and how AI
is is, is is,
driving these types of growth in a powerful way. And then the second half of
the book is technical strategy. So it was kind of my way of, like, publicly
coming out as a, you know, as a growth and marketing
person rather than a technical person, which I had been pigeonholed into,
a decade prior. Sorry for the long answer. No. It's a
it's a good background. I think it also speaks to the
nature of marketing is changing too. Right? It used to be you know, you think
Mad Men. Right? Like, you know, idea people in Madison Avenue
come up with crazy ideas. But I think increasingly because of
technology, because of data, it's increasingly a data heavy or data
driven role. Is that what you've seen too? I mean,
that's your background is is kind of the data side. I mean, everything is
is data, and
my marketing approach is very much, like, evidence based. Of
course, evidence based marketing. Like, everything needs to be strategic.
Everything needs to be backed by data. It needs to be based on the
market data and evidence. But,
you mentioned something. I'm sorry.
Yeah. I lost my train of thought there. Happens to the best of us.
That sounds very interesting to combine those two, and I can see
how you get, I don't wanna use the word synergy, but
that seems like the best word. It's the the VINs overlap quite a
bit or the Yuleers depending on, you know, what what exactly
you're drawing there for the diagram. But I was gonna go with I was gonna
go with peanut butter and chocolate, kinda like that. Yeah. The growth
marketing growth marketing is all basically just analytics
and data data informed everything with your
marketing. So Yeah. Actually, today, I just came out, and we're
trying to get my YouTube channel going again. And as you know, it's a lot
of work to have all the processes in place. But we did a really
cool interview with the CMO of
single store, Madhukar Kumar, and he covered multi a
multi agent AI and marketing. And,
it's such an interesting conversation and, like, it's
basically, I'm talking to him what is AI marketing strategy. And
to him, it's like basically taking the principles of
data science and machine learning and infusing
that into the marketing approach for the
company. And that yeah. I mean, that makes a lot of sense. And even,
like, a lot of the companies I support have, like, AI products and features. And
so, like, I can get in you know what I'm saying? It's like, you kind
of really need to understand. So this summer
how the product work. This summer, I co wrote a book called
Sentient Marketing and it's definitely not exactly the same what you're talking about,
but it's definitely the idea that the the the main takeaway of the book
is that marketing and I data people and IT people need to learn to work
together because that's where the field is going.
It's gonna be increasingly data driven and led by data as opposed
to intuition, right? Or however whatever
traditional marketing methods were. And, those are
not
historically, those are not really great. They don't get along
marketing and data and IT. Is that That's crazy. That's
crazy talk, Frank. But I mean, how do you see those worlds kind
of working together? Like, what have you seen? Right? Obviously, I think the
numbers tell the story, but, like, what's been your experience? Right? Because you're
kind of you're on the leading edge of of this transformation.
Thank you. And, yeah, I can tell you just, like, as a person who
came from the technology, engineering technology domain and
into, marketing. Yeah. That was a
hard adjustment because engineers and technical people really
looked down upon marketing people. I'm like, really
do. And I was like, don't call me a
marketer. I didn't want that. Like, I thought it was a stigma.
But, like, now working as a CMO and I work with
technical founders, that's my my, you know, tech tech startups is
my market. So,
no. I don't see I mean, they might still, like,
look down upon marketing people, but I don't see because you
what what needs to happen, especially with product led growth, like, there's a
lot of marketing and psychology that goes into all of,
like, the levers in a product, like, to to build
referrals and to get retention and to, like, optimize the
interactions of users with products in order to increase
select and value, retain customers, get, you know,
re referral referrals from
existing customers. Like, all of that stuff is evidence based
data. You get the data from the platform. You optimize,
and you have to understand psychology. You have to understand. So
it's very much marketing,
but but it's executed through automation
that's built by technologists. So
whether one side doesn't like the other or not, it's a moot
point because we have to work together to to make
this happen. And so there's not gonna be the retention rates we need for the
company to succeed. And and the same goes for sales. Like, a lot of
times, like, the sales team doesn't want to, like, listen to the marketing team, and,
like, the marketing wants to, like, do their own thing. But, no, they have to
be married. They have to be, like, really, deeply
integrated. And I think it it it
I don't see a separation. But I also work with smaller,
more early stage customers. So, like, when you're working with corporations,
I think that they get a lot more siloed and it's trickier.
Yeah. I know that answer. Go ahead, Andy. Sorry. I I love that
answer because I think you're you you hit on
probably the thing that's, that's different about especially
engineers and and marketing people. Engineers aren't
typically known for being into psychology,
and marketing relies on psychology an awful lot. It's
not I'm not saying one's better than the other, but,
you know, navigating the strengths. And
and I love your analogy of calling it a marriage because if you're,
you know, if you have two people in a relationship that are
identical, that doesn't work well. To what you need
is someone with opposing strengths to to yours. They
they'll they'll compensate for your weaknesses, and that needs to go both
ways. Like Yeah. That's one thing I love about my job
is, like, basically, I'm, a a
consumer or customer advocate. So because it's very when
you're building the product, it's very easy to be
very interested in the product and how the product works and all the things about
the product. And, like, so I'm always thinking about the customer. Does that
Mhmm. Like, what's in it for them? Like, why should they care?
And, like, how do we get them to time to value down to, like, they
wanna give, like, two like, they care two craps. They do not
care about, you know, generally, like, people do not care about the solution. They just
want the out. They want the result, and they want it as easily as possible
with doing as little brain work or
investment of energy and time as possible. So I'm always, like,
advocating for that. Whereas when you're building the solution, myself
included, when I'm building the solution, it's so easy to get into the
details that you've, like, it's all about the solution, but it's, like,
you know, from my world, it's all about the customers and, like, the results.
Sure. Yeah. There's all these trees, and it
turns out there's a forest. Exactly.
No. And it's particularly, if you come from the technology angle, it's very easy to
get distracted by the shiny objects,
especially the new stuff. How do you see?
You mentioned agentic. Right? And that is, you know, we're recording
this on, 01/21/2025. Agentic seems like
it's gonna be the buzzword of the year. What's your take
on this, and how do you see it changing?
You think so? Yeah? Agentic? I just seems like
just reading the the tea leaves and kind of, like, you know, a
lot of the research papers, a lot of the buzz is all around agentic.
I'm personally not convinced just yet, but it
seems like a lot of people I think part of it is
founders that went down the rabbit hole and they invested, like, their whole top level
of marketing messaging around agentic. And then,
like, then they came to me, like, at the end of last
year, and we're like, no one knows what agentic is. No one knows
what agentic marketing is. It's like I think, like, in,
like, like, Silicon Valley, they know there there's,
like, a lot of hype around this. And I think that, yeah, there's a lot
of possibilities. But I also think, like, in the real world,
people don't know what that means, and it's probably pretty hard to sell.
Because you gotta look at the market size and the problem
you're solving and the urgency. You know? So if it's nice to have
and, like, how how easy is it to reach these people. And I think,
like, there's so few people that even know what's what that
means. There's also no yeah. Absolutely.
And there's no there's no consensus
definition of what makes something agentic. Yeah. Right?
So I I just I'm not sure if
it's a, you know, hey, look, we're, you know, the generative AI hype wave now
is two, two and a half years old. You know, now we need a new
thing called agentic generative AI. Right? We need a new adjective to make
it kinda continue. That's kinda my you know what I mean? But I
also think that there might be some legs to this. Right? Because I think that
the there there is the notion of like, and again,
it all depends on how you define agentic. Right? So for my purposes of
thinking about this, agentic is an AI that can
do something. Right? Like, you know, so bit like the Nest
thermostat. Right? Oh, it's gotten cold. You know, it's this time of
year. Raise the temperature. In a sense, in
a very kind of way, it has some kind of agency. Right? So in my
mind, that that that's agentic. Now I've seen
people take robotic process automation and
slap a new coat of paint on it and call it agentic, which
from one definite one look of it, like, I could see where you could justify
that. I don't think it's true agentic AI. Like, what's your take on this? Because
you you mentioned you work with startups. They they they went hard on this,
agentic message. Do you think maybe they did it too soon
or, like, it's just it's a evolving market? In this
case, I think that they were in Silicon Valley, and they
so it was, like, it it was being pushed really, like, a lot of hype
around this in the end of last year. And, I know I
think there's a ton of possibility. And I've been interested in
in, like, AI agents. I see some Facebook ads
like AI agents. And, honestly, today,
after, like it's interesting because I I'm, like,
publishing this video on multi agent marketing,
multi agent marketing, and then I'm, like, trying to build this process
for my team member so she can, like, SEO optimize everything and take it over
the blog and SEO optimize everything because I need to delegate this whole thing over,
and she's never done it. And I'm just, like, looking at all this, and I'm
like, why am I doing all this? There's gotta be an agent
that can integrate between WordPress and YouTube to
to do, like, an integration with some
sort of agent generative AI agent to, like,
populate, like you know what I'm saying? I'm just like, that's gotta already
exist. You you you're speaking my language
because I have a system I wrote called Dingo,
that does this. Okay. Does something very similar. It.
It basically, if you go to franksworld.com, this isn't
an ad for Dingo because I'm I'm I'm I'm I'm actually on the fence about,
like, should I open source this? Should I make it a SaaS? And this
is something that Andy and I can be going back and forth with for a
while. But, if you go to franksworld.com, I basically have,
it's called Dingo. Originally, it was named for one of the dogs you saw because
he looks like a Dingo. Yeah. And, I I I back
acronymed it to data in data goes in, data goes out. Right? That's the idea.
Right? So, like, you could I could give it a right now, it exists as
a command line program where I basically can
take a YouTube URL, and it goes out. It
pulls the transcript for the YouTube URL, generates a blog
post based on my writing style,
and generates the blog post, pulls the YouTube
metadata. So I have the tags. I have everything kinda, and it's all pre placed
into my WordPress blog. This is how Frank's world, you know, can
get hundreds of blog posts per month because I can automate the process to such
a degree that I do that. Now does it do the SEO? Doing?
That's what I'm doing. Yeah. So, as luck
would have it or misfortune would have it, whatever you
wanna call it, when I noticed that, OpenAI
knows my writing style because it was trained on a lot of my articles for
MSDN. Now I was really mad for about thirty
six hours, because I spent a lot of time with lawyers
over the last couple of years, one of which was the custody case. I
kinda asked my lawyer, like, hey. Like, they totally took my writing
style. Right? They totally trained it on my algo because I asked it a
bunch of questions. I could tell they pulled it from my MSDN articles, and there
was a lot of them, like, maybe fifty, sixty of them. And I asked my
lawyer, like, what can I do? And when she was done laughing, which is never
a good sign when your lawyer starts laughing,
she's like, there's not really much you can do. And part of it was that
when I signed the contract to write for MSDN, it was kinda like they
own the content. I was like, oh, well. But then after
about twelve hours of calming down from that, I realized that, no. Wait a minute.
Sam Altman did me a giant favor because now with the right
tuning and the right prompt, I can get it to produce articles
that it looks like I wrote because it was trained on
all my material. Mhmm. Or not all my material, but a
large corpus of documents that were that write like me.
And I've tested it, and that's basically what informs
Dingo. Right? So, like and it's also modular too. Like, you
can change out kind of the things. Right? I didn't you can also point it
to different blogs. Right? So, like, I have a a quantum computing blog that, you
know, if I change the parameter, it'll go that. But don't wanna go down this
rabbit hole, but stuff like that does exist. And, you know, as you are a
SaaS expert, we should probably talk offline after this and get your
thoughts on this. But, but no. I mean I mean, you're right. I
mean, like, I guess that's kinda agentic. I didn't wouldn't think of that as agentic
because I still kinda have to kick it off. But, I guess
what I'm thinking of is and this is probably the buzzword for 2026,
is autonomous agentic AI because we all you know, you know how it is. Like,
you know, the hype cycle you need to add in that adjective every every so
often to keep people interested. Yeah. Yes. Sorry. I I I
totally, like, went on a tangent. You could tell I had good coffee. No. I
see this on your website, and it's really interesting.
I like the idea of Dingo. Yeah.
Yeah. And Frank, Frank's being as as you know, you if
you're listening to this for the very first time and you're hearing Frank talk about
it, you're like, well, Frank talked an awful lot about that. He didn't cover
half of the functionality. So Dingo grew out of
trying to automate things to get the podcast,
out, generate transcripts. And That's right. He's taken
it even he's taking it even farther. I'm not gonna let the cat out of
the bag, but he's been experimenting for probably six
months now with yet another feature that that I won't
mention. But I get to listen to the results, and it's
awesome. I have this tool called cast
magic, and it basically I love cast magic. Yeah. And it
sounds like that's where I get I'm getting my content girl, like, just don't
even bother. Just, like, just use cast because you can put in custom
prompts, and you can train it on your writing style. So we use
GPTs, and I have purchased GPTs, and then I build them based on my
own writing style. But, like, Cast Magic
pretty much So Cast Magic everything. CastMagic is really good for pulling
the transcript, and it's really good at pulling transcripts. We should
we should totally have a Did you see the content, though? You can do custom
prompts in there now. You can do custom prompts. And what's interesting is is
that well, I love CastMagic. First off, like, I could totally fanboy out
on this. I bought it off AppSumo, which if the folks don't know what AppSumo
is, awesome. So you know what AppSumo is. AppSumo is freaking awesome. And
his book is even more awesome. Noah something. I forget his last name.
He has a hundred Noah Kagan. He, hundred million dollar weekend or something
like that. Something like million dollar weekend. Excellent book.
But there's a lot of good tools there. And you
basically you buy, like, you know, the deal that if you bought it off,
off AppSumo Cast Magic off AppSumo, we have sweetheart deals that
no one else could get anymore. Right? Like, so, like, I put a lot of
stuff on Cast Magic. Tell you. And,
I put a lot of stuff in cast magic. Magic is good. I got my
like, I'm just like yeah. Because I used to have, teams,
like, a content repurposing team and, like Right. Honestly,
is they didn't charge too much and and I kind of, like, everything was
ironed out and would just get done for me. So now, like, building a new
bringing in a new person starting from scratch is kind of a lot of work.
But, like Right. Also, I'm, like, I don't need I would rather have
someone that uses AI and just, like, I don't need to
overpay for this. You know what I'm saying? Right. Right. It should just be a
a a function of compute, particularly, like, once you train it on
I think it was you and I on that initial call many, many years
ago, I was talking about, like, you know, well, I do this and I do
that. And you're like, you basically said something to the point of why the
hell are you doing all this yourself, Frank? You should
hire you said this, something like that.
If you said hell, I don't remember, but it was kinda like with that tone
of, like, that's how I remember it. Right? So, like, you were like, why are
you doing this yourself? You should get a virtual assistant. And then when you start
coming to pay for things like that, my wife and I are not on the
same page speaking of marriage and and complimentary skill
sets. Right? Points of view. Right? We're not always in the same page. So, like,
that has led me to be very
creative in terms of, like, how can I automate those? Right? So I have a
lot of things that I built. Like, for instance, if you drop if
somebody drops something on my Outlook calendar, like my personal,
office tenant calendar, I actually have a script that
will copy that to all my other calendars, work related
and per like, a bunch of other calendars. In fact, they even modified
it that, if it has the word podcast in
it, Andy gets a copy. Yeah. And so far that
mostly works. How does it know that something's
spilled, like, some physical liquids spilled on
the computer. How would it detect that? It just No. It doesn't it
doesn't do that. No. No. I'm saying they they put something on my calendar. Not
a Oh. So, like, if you schedule Sorry. I missed the No. That's okay.
It's conversation. When I said dropped it on my calendar, that's
probably the verb. I Okay. It was a poor verb choice on my part.
But, no. So, like, originally, I built it because I was
I left Microsoft to join a startup, and this startup was
one of the worst work experiences I ever had. And I realized very quickly that
I needed to get out before the SEC got involved
or before they ran out of money. Like, it was one of those situations. It
was, like, all hands on deck. And I realized I had a I had a
lot of meetings. I had I had to coordinate with, you know, the day job.
And I also had to coordinate a lot of these interview calls. So I was,
like, at the time, I just picked up Office three sixty five for
my family. And I was like, I'll write a
Power Automate agent. And that's basically what it is. It's a, it's a thing. So
when an event happens and the event is add a cap, add an object
to my outlook calendar, it then fires off a whole
series of tasks that then spread it off across different
calendars. So You're reminding me. I can't you know, like and that's
good. You need technical people to build these things. Because then it's like you
you built these automations. Like, I built this whole membership, and then, like, I decided
after I launched it that I just, like, didn't like the sales numbers, and it
was a whole learning experience. But then I built all these freaking automations and had
someone spend a lot of time and, actually, a lot of money, like, building. Like,
I didn't just buy the solution. I was like, no. We should build this on
WordPress, and we should, like, let's do it in let's
do it in Discord. So you need an automation for everything. And then it's like
something changes, and, like, the whole thing need breaks
and, like That's kind of the catch with No. I don't want anything. Like,
automation seems to be lean and nimble and
That's it. No. A %. Like, that's why, like, I haven't really modified
it because I want it to be single focused. So that
way, if one thing breaks, God forbid, it only affects
one thing. But that's where I see a lot of these RPA systems. In
fact, I did have an RPA system that predated Dingo that was
like a Rube Goldberg machine. Like like, you know, it did this. It downloaded this.
It did this. It did this. It did this. But one break in the chain
and the whole thing went kablooey. And then that became a
crisis. So you're right. Like, automation needs to be lean,
isolated, and, I don't know. I'll probably come with another word later,
but, the no. But I mean the whole thing with
agents as well. So it's better to keep them in just doing multitasking.
The agent the multi agents is basically just like anything else.
Like, you guys do you're a data engineer, Andy. So you know
MapReduce and you understand about others and master.
There's a master managing many different tasks at the same time. So I
think it's pretty much probably the same type of architecture with a multi
agent system. And that's where I see the
whole, you know, when people say agentic, what I hear
as a as a data engineer is, first
first, the engineering part of that is I want systems that are
decoupled and independently resilient. And
then I want when I start using them together, I don't want them to
be coupled, but I do want them to communicate. I want these
dotted lines between these disparate systems, and
I want that to also be somewhat resilient.
Not so coupled not so much that I would use the word couple to
describe it, but I want them to be able to communicate.
And I like the idea I learned this
from managing teams and working with people, is
that you get people who are experts in many different
fields that have many different strengths and accompanying weaknesses,
but who cares if they're AI agents, what their
weaknesses are, as long as they can
complement each other. And so that's where that dotted line
comes in between these systems with different focus.
And it's a little like, you know, wrangling cats at
times. And I I too have, some custom
G. P. T. S. That I I think we're around with every now and then
and even some stuff running locally. But it's interesting
to see how these systems when you get them just a little
right, they don't have to be perfect yet, but they'll start feeding
each other. And that's what I think of
when I hear the word agentic, and in my mind, my mind
goes to the word community. A community of
AI, bots, agents, GPTs, whatever you wanna call
them, that will work off each other.
And so far, I've managed to get them to go through maybe
two or three passes where one feeds the other and then
the other feeds back and that. But after that, it gets stupid.
They just start making crazy suggestions, but they're getting
better. That's so interesting. Yeah. That's what I do sometimes, like, when I'm, like,
needing to fill out forms and, like, develop,
like, yeah. I I use one one
chat channel one chat GPT channel to, like,
synthesize the information, the answer to the question, and
then fill that. Because usually, when I'm using
GPTs in order to execute something for
me, there's, like, a series of questions, and I have all this
source data. So I have to, like I use one chat
channel to synthesize the information from the source
data to fill in the answers of the other the GPT so
it can synthesize. So it's like I'm actually running it, but I'm
using almost most of the reasoning.
ChatGPT is doing it. I'm just, like, manually feeding one
channel to the other. I don't see that as an issue.
Myself. No. Right. I don't I don't see that issue with copying and pasting, you
know, pulling the response and pasting into another. That's how I started with
it. There's a guy on Twitter, Doug Doug Finke.
I think did we interview Doug? I know we talked about it,
but he's I don't think we've I don't think we have. But
Doug specializes in PowerShell, and he got into
AI. And when he started doing and he does these free webinars
all the time where he's literally hooking these together, so
he's doing the automation. And if that's the path
you're on right now, Lillian, you may wanna we'll we'll have to send you a
link to Doug's channel, and you can watch
every at least once a week. He's doing something for free and
just out there sharing. And I think it's amazing because it's
it's the I word, integration. And I
I love integrating these because that's a heart of
automation. Mhmm. That does not yeah. That
sounds interesting. I'd love to just check out what he's doing. And I and
I do have to say, like,
excuse me. Rhett Bless you. Bless you. I
did sort of thank you. I
I have a friend who brought me into
one of these companies. I I'm not
even gonna give a plug on it because I don't feel like they earned a
plug. But I will say that
this company used clay
to basically string together a bunch of
reason. It is obvious to me that they had string together a bunch of
reasoning nodes, using that were
all connected to OpenAI's API. So the
reasoning nodes were all driven by ChatGPT.
And, like because I I paid I needed to get I, like,
overbooked, and I needed to get a, market
analysis done, and I needed to travel to Bangkok. So I hired my
friend who's an MBA, and he's, like, a product leader from CNN,
and he really knows what he's doing. And he comes back the next
day with recommendations. And then I'm like,
I need some supporting data
reports. I need some you can't just give me recommendations. I need to see
where this is coming from. And he said, well, it came from, like, over a
hundred reports. And, so I'll pull the most
credible of them. So I go and he pulls the credible ones and
it supports the recommendation. I'm like, okay. That's great. Like, this is so
much more thorough than if I had done it and took, like, less time and
you got it done, like, amazing. But then I'm kinda like,
how did you get, like, a hundred reports? Because these were not
these were, like, Harvard business review. These were, like, serious,
seriously credible re reports. So he brings me into this
partner of his to see their technology. They built with Clay, and
I look at this thing. They press run, and there are some there are, like,
nodes. There's, like, 40 nodes. And the thing spits
out, like, 250 where where it had gone
to, like, 200 of all the partners of this
done all of the market research, all of the output data, and, like,
basically automated the entire assessment. And, like, that's how he
got over the report. He used CLiT. And it's like,
you know, if okay. So great. So, like, I'm like, okay. Great. So that
basically takes care of most of the target market,
like, market research stuff. Like, that's done and that's
but, like, as someone who understands, like, the full depth of what's
required for, like, go to market and to, like, product market
fit, like, you would be really dumb to just, like that's not like, I'm not
worried it's gonna take my job, but I'm also, like, you can spit out, like,
250. Like, this is like gold. Yeah.
So that's have you guys used clay? I've not used clay,
but I'm gonna put it on my list of things. Yeah. I just wrote it
down. And it's that's the thing, for so
many jobs that are are out there and if people
would would pivot into that mindset, it's like that's
probably a couple of weeks worth of work, and he came back with
it the next day. And so what that does is
it's a force a force multiplier. So instead of serving
20 clients a year, you can serve a 20.
And so if you're able to, you know, people pay for the result of
your work, if that's your value proposition, and it should be,
then all of a sudden, you've just, you know, multiplied,
you know, multiplied your income. Yeah. There's that and there's
also just, like, the sheer volume of
what you can get done, like, in the unit
time. So That's right. What I sell now, like, I just
couldn't have I yeah. It's basically the same thing you're saying. Like, I
couldn't have, like, sold the results I sell now with the time I
had without AI. Like, I'm totally dependent on it because,
like, a brain can't even reason that much. You know? It can carry so much
of the heavy lifting. You know? You just, like, oversight. But you don't have to
know. But the thing is, if you don't know, if you do not know the
ins and outs of what you're doing, there are, like,
it's a minefield. So, like, I'm not at all worried, like, oh, someone's gonna
come and take my job. No. No. No. No. No. Because go ahead and try
and use that. Try to use Chachi Petit to build a strategy
and, like, just fall right in, you know, fall right in it because you have
to really know what you're doing. You know what I'm saying? Sure. And it's
cool, but it's not gonna replace I'm not worried. He's like Very
much stuff. Ready. Yeah. So they I've I've
a very good friend of mine who is a, data scientist and does a show
every Friday at 2PM eastern. Oh, was that Lev? Lev
selector. He he and I had a conversation months
ago about this idea, and I believe the term he used was
reflection. And the idea is in training,
any type of AI. It's more of a training philosophy.
But the idea is if you want, a
helper, an expert helper, you
you ask it questions that you know the answer to,
And then when it gives you the answer, you give it feedback on that. Now
granted, you have to have a GPT that's at that level. I'm doing it with
something local. And over time, I've built virtual
Andy, who is also a data engineer. And
I'll, you know, it'll I'll ask it a question about how to build a pipeline
and some technology, and it'll come back with an answer. And it sounds
so confident because that's what they're designed to do, but it'll be
incorrect. And I'll remind it. Well,
yes. You can it it's a good idea, but
it's not physically possible to build, say, an Azure
data factory pipeline in this way because you're talking
about nesting iteration, and the it physically
will not allow you to do that. And then I'll let it,
you know, noodle on that for a few sentences, and I'll finally explain
to it what I would do. You know, real landing, not
virtual. And the trick is that in
the first iteration, your outer iteration, if you will,
you call a child pipeline, and that child pipeline
performs the inner iteration. That's how I work around it. But
as soon as I told it that, from then on, whenever I ask
it how to solve the problem, it didn't just say, well, just put this iterator,
an until operator, for instance, inside of a for
each. It would say, build a for each, call a pipeline, and in the
pipeline have an until. Stuff like that. And
that's the system becoming an expert because you tell it
to. And I think that's what I I'm not sure if the term was reflection,
but it's using what I know to make the make
the automation better at helping me. And it's
a it is very much a, you know, a positive
spiral and an accelerator. And it becomes even more
of a force, multiplier in in helping me
to to with ideas how to solve this problem.
I really like, I really like, even just
arguing against the reasoning,
with ChatGPT. Like a lot of times, not a lot of times,
but sometimes, I'll get done in an
analysis and assessment of something, and it'll come up
with something that I don't agree with. So
then I'm like, well, yeah, did you consider x, y, and
z thing? And then it might return back
an answer that's, like, something I hadn't thought of. You know
what I'm saying? So it was, like, a value, a lot of value. And,
like, the the, like,
I mean, because I'm one person, and this is an agglomeration
of the perspectives of millions of
people. So, like, it's not always right, but there are a lot of
perspectives and approaches that are right. And I have one
I have a lifetime forty five years of experience, but
it's collected generated, like, forty five million years of experience.
So, like, you can harness that. That's
true. Have you played with notebook l m at all? I'm just curious.
I have not. No. So it's interesting. So it's a Google
product, Google AI product, and it's really good. What it'll generate
is it'll give it a PDF, you know, document,
even audio file, video file, YouTube video, and it will generate,
among other things, a two person kinda NPR
podcast style interview where they're talking about
what it was trained on. And I find it useful because I
like audio content. It's, you know, in the car quite a bit
and whatnot. But it also can help
me think about things I hadn't considered.
So when they have these two hosts kinda debate a topic, it but it also
kinda it shakes loose kinda like the the the biological neural network. You know what
I mean? Like, where it it it it kinda like I hadn't
considered that angle. Right? And it's just I don't know. I find it
enriches, like, my brainstorming. And to your point, right, it is a
sounding board that is awake twenty four seven, assuming, you know,
it the servers are up and running. But it's
I find it fascinating in that it could be used that way.
And to your point, right, it's And also we have our perspective. Like like,
especially if it's anything where you're needing to speak, like,
an an executive level. Like yeah, I know everyone and their
mother, like, uses ChatuchyPT to, like, refine if they
need to send an email, they refine their email or whatever. But, like, it
also introduces perspectives. Like, if you're ever like, if you're in an
emotionally charged situation where you need to, like, it will
introduce like, I really like to use just critique this. And, like
Yes. You know, and, like, okay. Great. Like, actually, yeah,
you're introducing the perspective of the other person because, yeah, I'm a
CMO, and I think as a customer, except for when I'm in I'm in
the middle of it, and then it's a little bit harder, you know, for me
to, like, see the perspective of the other person. So, like, I don't need
it to necessarily call my best friend now and share
those, like, details. We could just, like, get a critique and, like, kinda,
level up that way. Absolutely. It
it is interesting that, that I find I kinda put that in
the category of of the empathetic AIs, and that became a
buzzword a few months ago. And the use
cases some of the use cases I find astounding, especially
with, with people who have experienced
military related, post traumatic stress. They're dealing
with those sorts of things. There's just a lot of success stories
coming out of that. But the LLM PTSD?
Yeah. Yeah. There's a lot of Could you share a little bit more about that?
I'm interested how an AI could actually help with PTSD.
It it's it's talk therapy. And because
it's trained in, you know, in in a lot of talk
therapy, it, it it does a a fair job
of that. I haven't, I'm not recommending it. I don't
know enough about it. I haven't looked into it enough to see that. But,
that's a topic near and dear to my heart is helping people who are struggling,
you know, with PTSD. I'm a, I was in the National Guard for
six years. We you know, it's nothing like what people who have
seen action. You know, I never saw anything like that, but
it's it's just a soft spot in my heart for people who struggle with
that. Yeah. I I same. I mean, I I
was late for work on 09:11, so I have my own little dance with PTSD.
So Yeah. Right. Yeah. I,
had I not been late for work, see, there's a fifty fifty
chance I'd still be alive. Yeah. And it's just the
number of that it kind of weaving that into what you said
about, you know, what mindset is front of mind for for
you, getting ready to to speak to
some situation. And you may not be in the best mindset.
You may be because not any no malice. No, you know, there's
nothing wrong with what you're you're feeling or anything, but it's
just different. You're thinking customer and you need to talk
to a CEO. That's different. And and
necessarily so. It's not that the CEO is evil. It's not that the
customers are evil. It's that there's a difference there. So
just, you know, pull the emotion out of it and the judgment out of it
and just think about the communication style.
And it it kind of fold into this, a tweet I
saw. Gosh. It was 2023,
and data scientists working with LLMs. And he
said a lot of people make a big deal out of
LLMs hallucinations, and some of them are funny and some are
tragic. We we totally get that. But his point
was they always hallucinate. They don't know how to do anything
else. They're not that bright. It's only it's only called salus
hallucination when it's wrong. When it's wrong and and and or
ludicrous or, you know, infuriating. Glue on
pizza? It's fair. Yeah. It's
fair. But at the same time, when you think about what it's doing, you know,
especially down on, like, the vector database level, It is just, you
know, it's it's nearest neighbor or some other algorithm that
it's using to identify the next word based on to to
your point, Lillian, twenty five million
documents that it's looking at. And you've got you and, you
know, access to a handful of friends and experience and the
conversations you've had at one second per second,
you know, human speed. And it's put together this huge big
data, solution, which sounds
awesome. Attention is all you need. Yep. Yeah.
And so, you know, they the there are fallacies of
big data. Nassim Taleb has mentioned several in
his books, in his insert, where he talks
about the things that big data the past big data can lead you down
that are, you know, incorrect or wrong, and especially in the fields
of predictive analytics. The quality of your data can
be north of 99%, way north of it.
And, you know, but there'd be fallacies introduced into it,
and the analysis will produce the wrong result. Sometimes tragically,
horribly wrong. And, so I I'm I'm not
I'm gonna stop there because I'm starting to get a wandery. But
Yeah. No. No. This is great. This is what we do, Lily, and we kinda,
like, go on these different trains of thoughts. One of one person said we should,
we we get off track a bit. One person suggested that we sponsor an
off road racing team because we're always off the but I wanna
be respectful of your time. Plus in your time zone, it's probably pushing
11PM. May not may not. Yeah. I actually am getting a little
little tired. We wanna be respectful of time, but, as always, you're
welcome back in the show. Thank you so much for having me on.
And I enjoyed our conversation and, like, it's fun that we have.
Like, synergy about, like, AI, you know, like, we're
we're we're all we're, like, at least you guys I think we're all
kind of working in a different capacity, but we're,
having a lot of overlap in our experience, and I feel like that's
nice to kind of hear. Absolutely. It's always gonna be a different opinion
around the we're all dancing around the same problem. Right? And, like, some of us
are in a different orbit and things like that. Where could folks find
out more about you, what you're up to? LinkedIn.
LinkedIn is good. I'm starting a LinkedIn newsletter, by the way.
Cool. Awesome. I think so. Yeah. Well, I'll connect.
Yeah. Definitely. Thank you. Yeah. Let's connect, Eddie. I'll I'll find you now
so I can make sure that k.
I have there's a cartoon me as my avatar. So the
guy it's a little cartoon with a beard that goes off the frame.
Alright. Alright. Okay. So And,
Craig, thank you so much for having me on. That was great. Thanks for thanks
for joining us, and, I'm very glad we had this talk.
It's awesome. Oh, thank you. Okay. So I'm gonna connect. And
then, yeah, if you guys ever wanna talk shop about your startup
idea, I'm always Cool. Awesome. Please let me on speed dial.
Awesome. Alright. Well, with that, we'll let our British AI
who I suppose she's a bit agentic, Bailey finish the show.
That's a wrap for this episode of Data Driven. A huge thanks
to Lillian Pearson for sharing her insights on AI, growth
strategy, and the evolving landscape of data driven marketing.
If you enjoyed this episode, be sure to subscribe, leave a
review, and share it with your fellow data enthusiasts. And
don't forget you can find data driven among the top 100
AI podcasts. Number 38 to be precise,
so clearly you have excellent taste in podcasts. Until
next time, stay curious, stay data driven, and
maybe, just maybe, start training your own AI agentic
overlord. Cheers.