Speaker:

There is so much out there to get mad about. Social injustices, class warfare, continued

Speaker:

colonization, the act of destruction of our planet by those focused on profits and not

Speaker:

people. We can find it overwhelming at times. The good news is there are equally as many,

Speaker:

if not more, stories of people coming together and rising up against the forces at play. So

Speaker:

the creators of Blueprints of Disruption have added a new weekly segment, Ravel Rants, where

Speaker:

we will unpack the stories that have us most riled up, share calls to action, and most importantly,

Speaker:

celebrate resistance. Welcome. Can you introduce yourself to the audience? Okay, hello, Dara.

Speaker:

My name is Mohammed Ramadan. You can call me Mohammed or you can call me Mo. Majority of

Speaker:

my friends and family call me Mo. Lebanese. Moved to Canada in 2019. I'm a teacher by trade,

Speaker:

by choice, a science teacher. I'm a leftist in all of my thinking and life and love and

Speaker:

relationships and an activist, a photographer, a lover of art and a lover of Palestine. Lebanese

Speaker:

by birth, Palestinian by... soul. That's why when people ask me if I'm Palestinian, that's

Speaker:

usually my answer. It's like, no, I was born and raised really close. But that border that

Speaker:

was drawn by foreign forces does not really separate us. We didn't cross the borders. The

Speaker:

borders crossed us. You can't see Mo, but he's wearing a kaffir and we will be talking about

Speaker:

Palestine most shown me here for a rant. Recently, Lebanon has entered the fray in terms of talking

Speaker:

about Israeli armed forces and their aggressions. Most recently, a Hamas leader was assassinated

Speaker:

by the idea. Yeah, I was going to say executed, assassinated. language matters, right? You

Speaker:

hear me carefully crafting my words as I do this in Beirut or around Beirut, which is in

Speaker:

Lebanon. And for those who've been paying attention, we know that this isn't the first time Israel

Speaker:

has struck within Lebanon or Syria or within other nations under the guise that it's defending

Speaker:

itself. I think two things kind of come up. as this event happens, right? People start

Speaker:

looking at Lebanon even more. I know this is not your first time carefully watching that

Speaker:

particular part of the region as being Lebanese and your family over there. I mean, you've

Speaker:

probably, I know you've had just your eyes glued, but I think a lot more people now are now looking

Speaker:

and they need some explanations. They wanna know what's happening, why. did this all start

Speaker:

October 7th kind of deal, which we know it did not. So you're a good person to pull into the

Speaker:

studio here with your knowledge and lived experience with Lebanon. I bet you Santiago is disappointed

Speaker:

he's not here. His family's also from Lebanon. He's got a good history too, and through his

Speaker:

dad and through living and what, I'm guessing his dad. grew up in Lebanon, right? It is,

Speaker:

yeah. Yeah. So I was born in 1986 in the middle of the Lebanese Civil War, which started in

Speaker:

1973. Prior to my birth in 1982, the Israeli military had invaded Lebanon, bombed and invaded

Speaker:

from the south of Lebanon all the way to the capital Beirut. They invaded. in the hopes

Speaker:

of fighting off the Palestinian resistance that they had pushed out of Palestine with the help

Speaker:

of the right-wing factions in Lebanon and other regional forces. Post that, a few years post

Speaker:

that, obviously Lebanese resistance started to form, be it the communist resistance, be

Speaker:

it the liberation fronts in Lebanon, which led to the pushback against the military. invasion

Speaker:

of Lebanon, the Israeli forces were kept towards the south part of Lebanon. They pretty much

Speaker:

created a fenced off south part of Lebanon and they stayed there till the year 2000.

Speaker:

If you are aware of what happened or if you're not aware of what happened from 1982 onward,

Speaker:

especially in the 90s onward. the Lebanese Islamic resistance or what you would hear called as

Speaker:

Hezbollah, started to organize and started to grow in fighting Israeli military and their

Speaker:

bases in south of Lebanon. It's a guerrilla war that they fought for all these years and

Speaker:

it was capped off in 2000 by pushing. Israeli forces completely out of the Lebanese borders

Speaker:

and liberating the occupied Lebanese territories to 99 percent, 98 percent. We still have some

Speaker:

Lebanese territories that are occupied in the south of Lebanon. There are the Shebaa Farms,

Speaker:

we call them the Mazarra Shebaa, which are historically Lebanese villages that are still currently

Speaker:

under Israeli occupation. So if we want to talk about, like, the United Nations. demarcation

Speaker:

line or like the actual borders of Lebanon and North Palestine. Those villages lie within

Speaker:

the Lebanese borders, which are still under Israeli occupation. So this is just historically

Speaker:

up until 2000, our liberation from Israel. In 2006, Israel waged a war on Lebanon, which

Speaker:

is known as the July war, the 33 day war, whatever you want to call it. That was its biggest.

Speaker:

military operation post its exit from Lebanon, post its push from Lebanon. So before we get

Speaker:

to current events, I wanna dig in a little bit to the 2006 July war. Yeah. Because you describe

Speaker:

it as an Israeli aggression. That's not how most listeners would have been told the story,

Speaker:

and if you check. most of your kind of mainstream sources. It is written very similar to the

Speaker:

narrative that surrounds October 7th, that particular conflict began on a very specific day where

Speaker:

Hezbollah soldiers crossed the border, took hostages, IDF soldiers, and brought them back

Speaker:

into Lebanon as leverage. to release other prisoners. So right away we know obviously the conflict

Speaker:

didn't start then because you already have incurred political prisoners that need freeing, which

Speaker:

is very similar to Hamas's motivations, which someone can discuss and argue, to have political

Speaker:

prisoners freed, right? We call them political prisoners, but the reality of it is that a

Speaker:

lot of these prisoners are civilian prisoners. that have been taken without really any reason

Speaker:

to take them. So, and they've been kept under military occupation, like under military detention.

Speaker:

That's an important distinction to make because it does imply, you know, a guerrilla militia

Speaker:

figure, a political prisoner. And that's definitely not always the case. And some of them, some

Speaker:

of them were, some of them were resistance fighters. Some of them were leader figures or religious

Speaker:

figures within the frame of the Lebanese Islamic resistance. Some of them weren't. Some of them

Speaker:

were just villagers who were in the South, who were just abducted for just being there. Another

Speaker:

one of the narratives that surrounds 2006 conflict between Lebanon and Israel is that it is a

Speaker:

proxy war. And in this region, it is no proxy wars are not new, right? Typically we're talking

Speaker:

about between the United States and Russia, but in this case, it's implied that it is between

Speaker:

Israel and Iran and that anything bad that happens in the region is surely funded and sponsored

Speaker:

by Iran. What do you say to that positioning? Because you call that a war of liberation.

Speaker:

I find it silly that we have to look at it from a lens, from a very Western lens of proxy wars

Speaker:

when we want to refuse to look at, for example, why would we want to look... Okay, I'll reorganize

Speaker:

my words a little bit better. Why would we want to look at it as a proxy war in terms of Iran

Speaker:

funding, let's say, and helping out one element, but we want to refuse to see that, for example,

Speaker:

the US or Western allies are funding vigorously. And like... with no checks, their arm in the

Speaker:

region, Israel. I don't see it as a proxy war. I see it as a war of resources, as a settler

Speaker:

colonial war. We've talked about wars of liberation. These are nations that have been occupied over

Speaker:

and over and over again. From the time like... post-Turkish Ottoman Empire to the establishment

Speaker:

of the current Palestine, Lebanon, Jordan, Syria maps, which were divided by the Brits and the

Speaker:

French. They were not left to be decided upon by the indigenous people who lived on those

Speaker:

lands, because there's a big argument in the region for a greater Syria, for example. You

Speaker:

still talk to a socialist in Lebanon who would talk about the greater Syria region, which

Speaker:

is geographically the Levant, which is Lebanon, Syria, part of Palestine and Jordan. Like it's

Speaker:

not, I don't like to talk about it as a proxy war. And I say that because I grew up there,

Speaker:

because it is more personal to me than just sitting out and talking about these wars on

Speaker:

a foreign land. and how they're just part of a cold war, part of a proxy war. I think that's

Speaker:

the purpose though, right, of them pushing that particular narrative. One, because everyone

Speaker:

quite quickly sees Iran as a bad guy, whereas the war of liberation, we understand that differently.

Speaker:

Those are the good guys. And so, it also belittles. the liberation movement and the fact that it

Speaker:

even exists, like as though people don't rise up on their own with assistance, but driven

Speaker:

from a need for liberation and a just right for liberation. And a proxy war just is so

Speaker:

much easier to dismiss and then shape further narratives around, especially when you start

Speaker:

talking about a regional... conflict and the involvement of US troops, right? It becomes

Speaker:

almost automatic every time the idea of Iran being involved. And so like, to be fair, I

Speaker:

think most people do look at US interventions as proxy wars, like what they do in training

Speaker:

militia and arming Israel. I think most people do see it that way. But trying to paint...

Speaker:

these wars of liberation, because you get the same comments being made about Hamas, that

Speaker:

it is simply just an extension of Iran and all the credit for any advancements and funding

Speaker:

and everything just kind of goes to this one state that they've spent so much time demonizing

Speaker:

that it's just like the go-to card, regardless if it's grounded in any context, because we

Speaker:

know that's part of revolutionary movements, right? Aid by other states. Cuba is famous

Speaker:

for this. And guerrilla warfare often relies on training from experienced revolutionaries.

Speaker:

So either way, I ask you about these narratives, hopefully not to further it, but for folks

Speaker:

listening that are going to hear these narratives and then be able to deconstruct it from your

Speaker:

lived experience, right? Rather than just scoffing it off. Because I think Yeah, the war for liberation.

Speaker:

And every time we talk about Lebanon and its relations with Israel, one can't help see the

Speaker:

parallels with Gaza, with Palestine. We owe it big time, I think, to Palestinians and to

Speaker:

the Palestinian diaspora to have changed over the last 90 days a lot of the way we speak.

Speaker:

Like... I grew up in Lebanon talking about the Lebanese resistance. The term resistance and

Speaker:

how uncomfortable it makes people feel here in the West. When you talk about Hezbollah

Speaker:

as a resistance movement or Hamas as a resistance, you want to dissect about or you want to talk

Speaker:

about how they're bad guys or how it's a terrorist group.

Speaker:

The challenging of the narrative in terms of terms that we use to describe these movements

Speaker:

as a resistance to the occupation forces is something that has been very costly to Palestinians.

Speaker:

And I think the Palestinian diaspora knows that it's so very costly, yet they have not been

Speaker:

silenced and yet they have not have refused to let go of using those terms.

Speaker:

You know, as an armchair observer, prior to October 7th, you would see some of the use

Speaker:

of words, martyr is another use of language there to refer to someone killed by the Israeli

Speaker:

forces, civilian or soldier. And you know, there's probably other examples that in your mind,

Speaker:

you know, you go, that's That's risky language to use. You'd go that because of how you've

Speaker:

been taught, the narratives you grow up hearing here. Not just that, like as someone who's

Speaker:

worked in politics, you understand that like sometimes your language should be measured,

Speaker:

right? You're trying to encapsulate as big a crowd as possible so you don't wanna alienate

Speaker:

people. Like there's other thoughts involved, but I was just. Once you kind of got to October

Speaker:

7th and realized that any form of resistance was now going to be like really criminalized,

Speaker:

it was going to like we saw that reaction and that's for me that's why I asserted myself

Speaker:

right from the beginning is like this is a right. I don't condone civilians dying but this armed

Speaker:

resistance is a right. This is not a criminal act up on face. It became clear to me why that

Speaker:

language had always been important. but I was naive, right? And I didn't criticize them for

Speaker:

it. I'm hopefully a better ally than that. But in my mind, sometimes I'm going, ooh, wow,

Speaker:

that, you know, it hit you a different way when you'd read it and you would know which groups

Speaker:

were using this language and which groups were maybe trying to do what I was talking about,

Speaker:

being a little more broad, being a little more

Speaker:

delicate with the settlers. So I'm gonna take from what you just said. I'm gonna take a point

Speaker:

that talks about when you mentioned having to talk about, like, we don't condone the killing

Speaker:

of civilians, right? And I'd like, I'm going to ask a question to the audience or to listeners.

Speaker:

And it's like, if we were to look at the resistance movement in Lebanon or the resistance movement

Speaker:

in Palestine and to look at the target of their resistance. Who are they targeting in their

Speaker:

resistance? Are they really going after civilians in a vicious way? Or are they, is there war

Speaker:

against the military occupying machine? Will there be civilian casualties in that process?

Speaker:

War is ugly. Liberation wars are not something, Koshy, they're not a piece of cake. They're

Speaker:

not something comfortable to engage in. And yes, there'll be civilian casualties, right?

Speaker:

But what is the target versus when you look at the settler occupying forces in Israel and

Speaker:

their targets and the way they go about their military missions, be it in Lebanon or be it

Speaker:

in Palestine. The casualties are the civilians on that end, way more than the resistance they're

Speaker:

trying to fight. Or quote unquote, like the terrorist organization there. And I use the

Speaker:

word terrorist from their point of view. I won't argue that. And it gets really complex too

Speaker:

when you look at the act of settling. The act of act of settling. Like I think I'm not trying

Speaker:

to remove myself from any responsibility, but I think there's a difference. in this moment

Speaker:

of, and maybe I will regret this and rethink this, but between like Canadian settlers and

Speaker:

Israeli settlers that are continuing to violently encroach on land. But on the other side, when

Speaker:

we talk about guerrilla warfare, and that is one of, I do enjoy reading that book written

Speaker:

by Che Guevara. And civilian deaths. are to be prevented for not just like moral reasons,

Speaker:

but also strategic reasons. Like let's war is dirty war. Like in all wars, civilian deaths

Speaker:

are very high. Chigavere writes about the need to win over the populace. So it has a bit of

Speaker:

a different application when you are talking about a civilian force that is recruited into

Speaker:

the army and that is actively settling against your cause. The Cuban revolution was done in

Speaker:

a way that liberated the people in the territories the guerrillas needed to pass through. But

Speaker:

still, I still feel grounded in saying that in any kind of war for liberation, the goal

Speaker:

should still be to avoid civilian death. but it's not my role ever to second-guess acts

Speaker:

of resistance like this. And in this fog of war that exists particularly around this conflict,

Speaker:

there's, you know, it's not even fully understood exactly how everything unfolded or the motivations

Speaker:

or the plans. So, and that becomes almost besides the point because it's still always framed

Speaker:

as... this insinuating or this initiating event, which it is not. It is a response to severe

Speaker:

oppression and violence. And again, you can speak to some of the similarities that the

Speaker:

people of Lebanon have been experiencing, like not just in the occupied territories, but the

Speaker:

impact that war, both of those wars that we've referenced have had on. the people of Lebanon

Speaker:

over all these years who are still, you know, so now you've got the, you know, we're kind

Speaker:

of, we're moving into modern times and you're going to lead here because you know more. But

Speaker:

I want to just kind of throw in that it's not just the leaders of Hamas that were targeted

Speaker:

in Lebanon. The U.S. intelligence has reported that they have hit many Hezbollah targets,

Speaker:

many civilian targets, and they've also hit the LAF targets, which is really upsetting

Speaker:

the Americans because that is the US trained and backed alternative that they'd like to

Speaker:

have for. And again, this is just a mirror of what they're attempting in Palestine. And I'm

Speaker:

sure we can name many other states where- So we're gonna talk the Lebanese armed forces

Speaker:

who have lost, and I'm gonna say martyrs, because- Their job is, like their purpose as an armed

Speaker:

force is to protect, technically to protect your borders. In the South for us is to protect

Speaker:

our borders from the Israeli occupying forces. To ensure the sovereignty of the Lebanese people,

Speaker:

right? To die in the line of duty is kind of the definition of your martyrdom there. And

Speaker:

they've, like the Israeli military forces have targeted Lebanese armed forces. The Lebanese

Speaker:

army forces based some one of the bases a few weeks ago Multiple times killing I think not

Speaker:

just one. I think more than one officer on duty for soldiers But again the Lebanese armed force

Speaker:

is a weakened military force that is like you said the alternative solution that the US is

Speaker:

trying to provide. But we're talking about a Lebanese armed forces who still have tanks

Speaker:

from the 1970s, whose all their modern gear is decommissioned gear that's from the US that

Speaker:

is no longer allowed to be used in the US that is now donated or sold. Okay, so when I say

Speaker:

U.S. trained and backed, we're not talking about like Israeli style U.S. trained and backed.

Speaker:

No, see there's a big difference between a German, let's say military that goes and trains in

Speaker:

the U.S. or an Israeli military that goes and trains in the U.S. or Canadian military that

Speaker:

trains in conjunction with the U.S. military versus kind of like throwing your crumbs at

Speaker:

and leftovers and saying we're training you and we're providing you with help. Because

Speaker:

there's much to be said. And people have argued, and there's evidence, that Benjamin Netanyahu

Speaker:

funded Hamas, or at least encouraged its development. And that- In a divide and conquer move. Absolutely.

Speaker:

And so there's a vested interest in kind of having a continued struggle rather than a clear

Speaker:

winner. And this is again, you know, equally applied to Palestine and Lebanon. And so I

Speaker:

think people can start to see why there has been so many rocket launches from Lebanon into

Speaker:

Israeli territories in response to the siege on Gaza. So we'll jump into the Lebanese side

Speaker:

of this that started to happen at the start of October, the second week of October. Israel

Speaker:

started to bomb heavily, to bomb the north of Gaza heavily. I think the Lebanese resistance

Speaker:

took it upon itself to start targeting military outposts all across the southern Lebanese southern

Speaker:

borders as a way to alleviate a little bit of the pressure. In doing so, it has drawn a huge

Speaker:

amount of the Israeli reserve forces and the Israeli military forces towards the Lebanese

Speaker:

northern. borders. So had it not done so, Israel would have, let's say, sent those forces or

Speaker:

a big chunk of them to the borders with the West Bank or with Gaza. So by doing so, I think

Speaker:

the Lebanese arm, the Lebanese resistance has just taken it upon itself to partake in this,

Speaker:

let's say, act of resistance. Someone has to. I hope most people can hear this and understand.

Speaker:

When we call representatives here to force them to ask for a cease-fire, to demand a cease-fire,

Speaker:

that's us partaking in an act of resistance to a genocide that we're witnessing. With the

Speaker:

Lebanese resistance and its military capability, it's able to target military outposts. And

Speaker:

I think, in the last couple days, Hassan Nasrallah, the... the head of the Lebanese Islamic Resistance,

Speaker:

aka Hezbollah, talked about the fact that they are intentionally not targeting civilians that

Speaker:

are left in the settlements on the northern borders. They are avoiding targeting civilians,

Speaker:

although they are fully within the reach of their artillery, their missiles, their whatever

Speaker:

ammunition they have. Their target has been on a daily basis, the military basis. And Israel

Speaker:

has some really big bases along its northern borders that serve as surveillance and drone

Speaker:

control and like, I don't know all the military terms for all that stuff. There's a few other.

Speaker:

They've launched the blimp. I don't know, people might have seen that. It's a giant blimp that

Speaker:

has massive kind of radar capability, completely a gift of the United States military regime.

Speaker:

But it's been trying to just weaken the capability of Israel to engage in an all-out war. And

Speaker:

there's real validity to this because the Washington Post reports that US intelligence is telling

Speaker:

Israel that they likely cannot afford to engage in a full-on battle with Hezbollah at this

Speaker:

time, with all of the resources going into fucking genocide that they've left themselves stretched

Speaker:

too thin. Now Israel's reporting that they've ended combat in the North. However, we know

Speaker:

that they're just headed. to the south where everyone has been squeezed into a smaller and

Speaker:

smaller space to make it easier for them to kill. However, you know, this is just to say

Speaker:

those actions by Hezbollah are not fluff, right? They have impact and justification, frankly,

Speaker:

right? Because they are actually doing what they're meant to, right? They're making Israel

Speaker:

question that northern front a little bit. and drawing away genocidal resources. They're resource-breeding

Speaker:

the Israeli military, which is, there was, there's at some point a report, or a report that an

Speaker:

American ex-military spoke about how the attacks that... the Palestinian resistance is doing.

Speaker:

When they launch their Qassam rockets, which are cheaply made rockets, of a few, like, thousand

Speaker:

dollars per rocket. When they launch them onto the iron, and the Iron Dome has intercepted

Speaker:

them, the Iron Dome is spending about a hundred thousand dollar per interception. So you throw

Speaker:

a thousand dollar rocket, you get intercepted with a hundred thousand. So then when you throw

Speaker:

a hundred of those rockets, you're now bleeding into the millions of dollars with every, like,

Speaker:

response. It's a, the resistance movements in the Middle East are not dumb movements.

Speaker:

The level of education that is involved within those movements is insane. You ever get the

Speaker:

chance to sit and talk with people who actually are involved in resistance and you realize

Speaker:

the level of education that they have just dedicated. to understand what is economic warfare, what

Speaker:

is political warfare, what is military warfare. Like, it's just, so, it's not just attacking

Speaker:

Israel to draw them into a war. No, it's more attacking them into bleeding their resources

Speaker:

economically. And again, like you see the narrative shaped around not that maybe those attacks

Speaker:

are stupid, but perhaps they're futile. And that isn't the case at all. And one of the

Speaker:

main tenets of resistance, particularly guerrilla style resistance, is the need to wear down

Speaker:

your enemy. You can't meet your enemy head on. That is the purpose of guerrilla warfare. We

Speaker:

didn't really kind of- It's not two military forces that are equal in capabilities. That's

Speaker:

why they can't meet head on, right? And so sneak attacks and- There's a lot of strategy involved

Speaker:

and it's not only applicable in warfare, right? It's how, you know, the way that you describe

Speaker:

this is what Lebanon is doing with the resources it has. And it gives validity to the tactics

Speaker:

that we're seeing here to make blockades, to shut down Indigo one day at a time. To talk

Speaker:

about BDS. Yes, yes. And so, like, everyone has a role to play there, but it is. part of

Speaker:

legitimate resistance. And it does work, right? In certain circumstances and learning about

Speaker:

previous successes because guerrilla warfare is not new, right? We had a guest on from the

Speaker:

IRA and talking about how everything that they did and built on were previous revolutions

Speaker:

from all over the globe. And we'll talk, well, I'll throw in a small bone for those who Was

Speaker:

it last year that they marched on Ottawa? Who? The convidients? With, yeah, with convoys to

Speaker:

pretty much block the economic wheel of the capital. And the border, right? Isn't that

Speaker:

a form of, technically in their eyes, a form of resistance, right? Don't you give them that

Speaker:

credit, Mo. No, but we got to give credit where credit is due in terms of... what it's done.

Speaker:

But the dissonance to not be able to see what's happening now on the ground as a form of resistance,

Speaker:

that dissonance, that like schizophrenia almost. It's maddening sometimes. It's insane. And

Speaker:

it's not even a right-left hypocrisy. It's kind of permeated everywhere. And it's, yeah, it

Speaker:

is, I describe it as the Twilight Zone sometimes. I think I've said that. It's not right-left

Speaker:

whatsoever. It's, yeah. I wanna go back, like I feel like, I'm going back to July, that July

Speaker:

war, because the more I read about it, the more it was kind of the writing was on the wall.

Speaker:

July 2006 for our listeners. Yes, thank you. Yeah. We'll have some show notes in there for

Speaker:

folks to do a little bit more digging. But, you know, when you read about it, it also ended,

Speaker:

which is really, you know, uh, typical on how we write wars or definitely how we depict,

Speaker:

um, movements of liberation. So there's a definite date that it was ended, but part of the process

Speaker:

became a discussion on, you know, who would. police the area, who would, there were, a UN

Speaker:

resolution was passed to disarm Hezbollah. They were not a legitimate resistance anymore. They,

Speaker:

in the eyes of the world, right, that was the result. And hopefully I don't have to draw

Speaker:

those parallels where everyone is asking for Hamas to disarm and then we have Biden and

Speaker:

Netanyahu in negotiations talking about who should rule. Right now they're talking about

Speaker:

the north of Gaza because that's essentially been annexed. Listen, Hamas will disarm, let's

Speaker:

say. Someone else will pick up arms within the next five years, 10 years. If we want to be

Speaker:

realistic. Hamas won't disarm. I think that's just empirically impossible, the way that what's

Speaker:

happened has happened, just like Hezbollah does not disarm. And... In the end, the U.S. did

Speaker:

not get to decide who controlled. If anything, the Lebanese resistance has grown stronger

Speaker:

from 2006 till now. The U.S. military actually issued a report for its personnel post the

Speaker:

2006 war in terms of here are the things that we should not be doing, like learn from the

Speaker:

mistakes that Israel has done in its war in Lebanon. They clearly stated that Israel lost

Speaker:

in every possible way. in that war. And it's, Hezbollah has managed to grow from then till

Speaker:

now. That's 2006. We're talking, we're 2024 now, almost 20 years. But the human toll was

Speaker:

huge for... Yeah, no, they didn't learn their lesson though, or at least Israel didn't learn

Speaker:

their lesson, or perhaps this is the intention. You know, you say they lost. but they still

Speaker:

occupy territories. They pummeled parts of Beirut. Oh, they, like the destruction we're seeing

Speaker:

in Gaza is now folds and folds of what also we witnessed in Beirut, but for the density

Speaker:

of what Beirut is. So Beirut is about... 600 kilometers squared, really small, highly populated

Speaker:

because it's not laid out like cities here. There's no homes, it's all apartment building.

Speaker:

I like to call it the concrete jungle. It's just apartment buildings. They pummeled the

Speaker:

southern suburbs of the city. And when we talk about the southern suburbs of the city, it's

Speaker:

like talking about like two, three kilometers away from you. Like anywhere where you are

Speaker:

in Beirut, you're about two, three kilometers away, radius-wise, from anywhere. They pummeled

Speaker:

apartment buildings down. They were just dropping unguided bombs, unguided bombs, and vacuum

Speaker:

bombs, and just for the sheer point of destruction. No, no, no. They were trying to get the hostages

Speaker:

back, Mo. Right? Wasn't that the premise? That was... the major incursion, that was the start

Speaker:

of the war. There's always a reason. When a tantrum is thrown by a child, the ex-child

Speaker:

will always find a reason for their tantrum. And they will cling on to that reason as their

Speaker:

tantrum is getting wilder and wilder, and as their rage is becoming bigger and bigger. No,

Speaker:

because you're letting Israel off the hook there because they are not children. They have crafted

Speaker:

these situations. They are the child of their settler, mother and father in the West. But

Speaker:

yeah, but they're also not reacting to outside stimuli. They are creating said, you know what

Speaker:

I mean? Like they create the conditions for armed resistance against them and so that they

Speaker:

can use any, they were waiting. They were waiting for Hamas's next big move. to do this, whether

Speaker:

it happened on October 7th, or whether something happened six months later, or maybe it would

Speaker:

be like another great return. In the meantime, they were just starving. They already were

Speaker:

starving. And like the UN had the report, the United Nations had the report, was it four

Speaker:

or five years ago, about the unlivable conditions in the Gaza Strip? Like it was already deemed

Speaker:

unlivable. This is before any... October. It was already deemed. It's hard for people to

Speaker:

go back and remember that or have time to talk. I know it's our short term memory. Yeah. The

Speaker:

ability to forget. Yeah. The block paid on Gaza has been for years and I can't even remember

Speaker:

if I've talked about it on the show, but it includes things like baby bottles and dairy

Speaker:

products. It includes everything for people, like people in the West. People in the West

Speaker:

struggle to understand that everything,

Speaker:

everything that went into Gaza through the crossing borders, on their Western crossing borders

Speaker:

with occupied Palestine, or on the Southern crossing border with Egypt, was controlled

Speaker:

by Israel. Like Egypt was not fully in control of what was going in and out. And then when

Speaker:

people would be like, well, why did they build tunnels out of us? I was like, would you not

Speaker:

build tunnels out of your house if someone just blocked all the doors and fed you through the

Speaker:

window one piece of bread every two weeks? Like, would you not dig tunnels with your nails to

Speaker:

sneak food to your kids? You would. They would. And that's why it's important to keep people

Speaker:

reminding the conditions that existed for so long before October 7th. And... I kind of want

Speaker:

to go back to the food in the blockades and the unlivable conditions because not only are

Speaker:

the bombs killing people now, but we know that folks are also dying of starvation in Gaza.

Speaker:

And this is by design. It's not just because they're surrounded by soldiers and it's just

Speaker:

logistically impossible to get food. It's because those motherfuckers have targeted bakeries

Speaker:

and farms and... This is on top of the blockade that exists on the entire region. And they,

Speaker:

and this is historically how they've attacked settlements as well, by raising all of farms

Speaker:

and destroying the trees and strawberry fields. And we've all seen footage of this. And like

Speaker:

famine has been used many, many times in warfare. And we're absolutely seeing it again, except

Speaker:

this time around, they admit to it. And And maybe not in this context, they've explicitly

Speaker:

said, you know, we will starve them until they hand over from us. This is also, and this is

Speaker:

where it's. more enraging the fact that we are now witnessing. the sheer belligerence, like

Speaker:

the dutch, from the politicians to the settlers, to military commanders, Israeli military commanders,

Speaker:

Israeli politicians, Israeli settlers, Israeli parliament members. The fact that we are witnessing

Speaker:

it with our eyes, it's not like they're speaking about this behind closed doors or off the records.

Speaker:

It is... pretty well documented by their own media, pretty well documented by the world's

Speaker:

media, pretty well spread out on every social media. And we are still trying to convince

Speaker:

people of the vile and like the evil that is the settler state, the apartheid state of Israel.

Speaker:

That is what's tiring. This is what would takes a big toll on me. Like why are we still, like

Speaker:

instead of at this point, having all of us already knowing that this is just wild. Do I really

Speaker:

need to convince you with all the evidence that is out there? If you are, like, I don't know

Speaker:

how twisted or how, I'll go back to the episode of fascism that you guys did a few weeks ago.

Speaker:

And maybe that's what it is. It's the fascism that we are now living in that just denies

Speaker:

us. Canadians are kind of our own breed of obliviousness. We have a real kind of vision of what our role

Speaker:

is and our persona, and it's usually quite the opposite of what we're doing as a state. I

Speaker:

started reading the Tyler Trippley book that you guys, you had the episode about a month,

Speaker:

a month and a half ago. about the role of Canada and the world, especially in terms of settler

Speaker:

colonial, not just our role as settlers here and the genocide, the ongoing genocide we're

Speaker:

still pushing onto the indigenous population of Turtle Island, where it's just our role

Speaker:

in the global settler colonial system is just... Yeah. Part of our role we look at as a virtue.

Speaker:

And I'm talking about accepting refugees. And now before we go into this conversation in

Speaker:

no part, one of my favorite t-shirts is, it just says welcome refugees. And I love to wear

Speaker:

it around my conservative fucking town. I am of the position that everyone has the right

Speaker:

to migrate wherever they want to go, right? I don't. believe in borders. Yes, I know they

Speaker:

exist. I just believe they shouldn't. Okay. So before we get into that, know that, but

Speaker:

you know what, just, you know what, you're not the only one. You know who also has that belief?

Speaker:

Indigenous people who have lived here from time memorial. They are the ones who were welcoming

Speaker:

to the settlers when the settlers arrived. Let's not forget that. They didn't take up arms from

Speaker:

the start. And it's the same thing for indigenous Palestinians when we go back in history. They

Speaker:

were welcoming

Speaker:

to the Jewish settlers that had fled Nazi Europe, but then tables turned and political... movements

Speaker:

start to grow and Zionism starts to grow and military Zionism starts to take shape. and

Speaker:

at that point, you start to take arms. Residential schools here start to happen. Forced migration

Speaker:

starts to happen. Starvation and famine and diseases start to happen. And then you take

Speaker:

up arms. And at that point you then get labeled as the terrorist by no one other than the powerful

Speaker:

settler. You take up arms or perhaps you flee. So like back to the refugee question. not to

Speaker:

advocate for us, not to let the people of Gaza come. But that is a bit of a delicate situation

Speaker:

because I believe this push, there was a tweet sent out by Lowkey and he was reporting, I

Speaker:

should have grabbed the source there, but Tony Blair has been recruited by Israel to lobby

Speaker:

refugees as possible. We ourselves are exploring this. The Canadian government, the cabinet

Speaker:

just decided they'll let just under a thousand folks who have family here. There's criteria.

Speaker:

The fucked up thing about that one though is that Israel is doing the security screening.

Speaker:

I just want to explore this for a second because I find Israel has put itself in a bit of a

Speaker:

conundrum. So in order to complete the genocide, right, they can't literally wipe everybody

Speaker:

else out, or at least I'm telling myself that the goal is to displace folks as well as martyr

Speaker:

them. And in order to do that, they do need nations to take them in because they don't

Speaker:

actually want a refugee camp. They want the whole land. They don't want any resistance

Speaker:

building. They want these folks dispersed throughout the globe. That's what completes the genocide

Speaker:

because it's really hard to maintain your culture. Although the Palestinian diaspora is a great

Speaker:

example of resilience in this, but that's not the point. They deserve to live in fucking

Speaker:

Palestine. They deserve to live in a safe Palestine. And I know that doesn't exist. So I don't I

Speaker:

understand that people are trying to flee. And yes, there should be safe havens for anyone

Speaker:

trying to flee. But for us to latch on to now the refugee narrative and to think that can

Speaker:

absolve us from not stopping this. with whatever means necessary, and we will just simply take

Speaker:

the victims in. For me, that is, especially coming from the Canadian state, because it's

Speaker:

not benevolence, it's never fucking will be, right? It's complicity in this genocide. By

Speaker:

entering in those agreements that I bet you started well before October 7th. I imagine

Speaker:

the... Taking of as many Palestinian refugees as possible has always been part of the discussion

Speaker:

between Israeli diplomats and their counterparts throughout the world. They want, they always

Speaker:

want all Palestinians out of Palestine, clearly. You just need to see the shrinking map, the

Speaker:

embargoes, the starvation. And it's just hard. It doesn't take a smart human being to read

Speaker:

numbers. Very basic progression of numbers, of the number of indigenous Palestinian. Arab

Speaker:

Palestinians. And I'm going to refer, I'm going to call them Arab Palestinians, not Muslim

Speaker:

Palestinians, not Christian Palestinians, not Jewish Palestinians, Arab Palestinians. That

Speaker:

is just dwindling. But I think like Israel's also painted themselves into a corner here

Speaker:

though, right? Well, because they have spent the last, well, they've spent a long time,

Speaker:

but it's not- Starting five weeks plus 90 days. That's a good way of looking at it, because

Speaker:

it's like- this kind of asterisk in the last 90 days, like it's on hyper speed of what we've

Speaker:

seen for 75 years, but they've really demonized all Palestinians. So now they're in this position

Speaker:

of having to beg people to remove and take in Palestinians while painting them as all criminals,

Speaker:

as all terrorists, as all worthy of bombs dropping on their homes, right? So how can you turn

Speaker:

around and be like, here? here, why don't you take Hamas, right? Like, because they've sold

Speaker:

this narrative that there are no civilians in Gaza. That's, you know, those are things that

Speaker:

we've actually said. And so I think, yeah, it's a bit of a delirious situation. There is no

Speaker:

rhyme and reason, and there is no logic to any of their foreign diplomacy, any of their, I

Speaker:

don't know, I don't know. I don't know if it's just, those are all signs of... pariah state

Speaker:

that's just like a near collapse. I was gonna say that is an essential stage though, right?

Speaker:

Like people kind of gasp when we say that you have to politically isolate Israel, right?

Speaker:

It sounds like you want to erase them and I'm not gonna like get into the fact that an ethno

Speaker:

state shouldn't exist. We're talking about a state, we're not talking about a people. Let's

Speaker:

stop, let's stop feeding people. If I have to repeat that for my audience, I'm assuming they're

Speaker:

not listening anymore. Yeah, exactly. Don't worry. Exactly, like... But, yeah, it's...

Speaker:

We did that, we did that, we did that not a long time ago, within apartheid state in South

Speaker:

Africa. Absolutely. And I... You always read, and people... We've told each other, and I

Speaker:

felt warmth when people would say, like, all tyrannical, violent regimes fall. But I...

Speaker:

We can't rest on that, right? They don't fall on their own. They fall because they create

Speaker:

the conditions with which resistance is inevitable. It is the only logical choice for people. And

Speaker:

so when they get so terrible for so long, then you have created inherent resistance within

Speaker:

people and resilience. And so it becomes even more difficult, but.

Speaker:

because we had started talking about the July war in Lebanon, the 2006 war, and I forgot,

Speaker:

I think we drifted off. That happens when you have ADHD. Yeah, so we were talking about the

Speaker:

destruction and... 2006 that we witnessed in Lebanon. That again, what I'm seeing in Gaza

Speaker:

also is very similar to that destruction that I witnessed with my own eyes happen in Lebanon.

Speaker:

And I was there in 2006, like I was not far. I was about a kilometer and a half from the

Speaker:

southern suburb of Beirut. I was displaced out of my home, but I... purposefully moved out

Speaker:

of my home to go help with internally displaced refugees. There was, I think, about a million,

Speaker:

a million point two displaced, internally displaced refugees in the 2006 war that moved from the

Speaker:

south of Lebanon towards the central and the north side of Lebanon that were taken into

Speaker:

public schools all across Lebanon, into homes, public spaces, wherever possible. I left my

Speaker:

house and I helped with a whole bunch of my Scouts leaders at that point. I was part of

Speaker:

the Lebanese Scouts movement and we took care of refugees in a public school. We had 500

Speaker:

refugees that we were taking care of from 24-7 for the 40 days. It was 30 days of war but

Speaker:

refugees didn't just go back as soon as the war ended and turn into displaced refugees.

Speaker:

And that's, there's a part of that that... scares the shit out of me because I saw it firsthand

Speaker:

from my family member who lost homes in that 2006 war who didn't have homes to go back to.

Speaker:

So for the time being after the war they were still internally displaced refugees for months

Speaker:

and months and months at a time until the rebuilding process started to happen. And now in Lebanon

Speaker:

the rebuilding process started to happen. because we still had open borders with Syria, we had

Speaker:

open borders in our airport, I don't know what the rebuilding process will look like in Gaza.

Speaker:

If something doesn't happen, there's no rebuilding Gaza because Israel is annexing it and taking

Speaker:

it from the people of Palestine. So if it's rebuilt in their vision right now, it seems

Speaker:

like Gaza will be a resort city for Israeli settlers. So... Although, you know, when I

Speaker:

think of the rebuilding of Beirut and like there have been urban settings that have been demolished

Speaker:

in war and rebuilt, you make that point and Israel is kind of making the point that that's

Speaker:

not the plan here. When they say they've destroyed Hamas's infrastructure, they've destroyed all

Speaker:

infrastructure. But then they play under the agenda. This is a Hamas run. It has a strip.

Speaker:

And we again, we'll play, like this is a Hamas, democratically elected government that Israel

Speaker:

and the US both agreed that the elections were fair and square. And when they were elected

Speaker:

the first time, there was no foul play in those elections. But now... No, the powers that be.

Speaker:

It's a destruction. Yeah. Yeah, we're fine with what was happening. The destruction of not,

Speaker:

it's a scorched land. That's what they're doing. Like they're... Your last statement brought

Speaker:

up two points that I kind of want to hit before we sign off. But you talked about refugees

Speaker:

not returning home right away. And we talk about the delicacy or the delicateness of...

Speaker:

to leave Gaza or not to leave Gaza. How folks are likely struggling with, not between necessarily

Speaker:

armed resistance or leaving, but a variation of sorts. So you have journalists, you have

Speaker:

people that, like survivors of the NECBA, have the keys to their home and they wanna return.

Speaker:

They know and they've experienced generations of permanent displacement. And... That must

Speaker:

play into their decision on whether to apply for refugee status or not, whether or not to

Speaker:

flee if you can. And that's just not an option if you understand the borders of Gaza. It also

Speaker:

brought up another point that I wanted to make where I was corrected online in my language

Speaker:

that I had used. And it wasn't just nitpicking on my language. We talk about how language

Speaker:

is very important. And there was a few times where I referred to the people under siege

Speaker:

as Gazans. I know my pronounce, my accent there is horrible, but it's not my pronunciation

Speaker:

that was the problem, even though it is. It's the fact that they're not all from Gaza. Palestine

Speaker:

is full of internally displaced people still. That Gaza is... mostly a refugee camp. Yeah,

Speaker:

and that's what I was going to point out that these are not first time displaced people.

Speaker:

And we're talking, we're not talking about their families were displaced, some of them were

Speaker:

displaced in their lifetime once and twice already. Some of these people are, some of these people,

Speaker:

some of these people are originally from the north of occupied Palestine that have just

Speaker:

been driven away. Some of them are from the west of Palestine some of them are from all

Speaker:

across the occupied Palestinian territory and they've just landed and Gaza because That was

Speaker:

the two options. It was the West Bank and Gaza So like people I want people to kind of close

Speaker:

their eyes and imagine that shrinking map But we've made it our cover art. It's you can't

Speaker:

not have seen it the original 1947 map of Palestine and I think It should be a little more nuanced

Speaker:

than it is, but there's four variations. And the shrinkage that occurs is astonishing. And

Speaker:

you have to imagine that all of those people in the areas that are no longer labeled Palestine

Speaker:

on the world map. have either become part of the Palestinian diaspora that you see around

Speaker:

you, or they have gone into the West Bank at Umis and Gaza, which is why it's so densely

Speaker:

populated. For some of them, we also got to give it to those who are still on those territories

Speaker:

with third-class citizenship status with an Israeli. Like, they are Arab Israelis. Like,

Speaker:

Israel has granted citizenship to... Palestinians who decided to stay, but they are treated as

Speaker:

third class, not second class, third class citizens. When we talk about democratic state of Israel,

Speaker:

but we refuse to see the injustices of how that state goes about its own internal business,

Speaker:

it's mind boggling. And that's part of the apartheid argument, like the way that... your ethnicity

Speaker:

or your religion play part in how much you can participate democratically and the extent of

Speaker:

your right of movement in particular. And thank you for reminding me that I had left some Palestinians

Speaker:

out of the discussion. But the point is, imagine people, imagine you have been driven as a person,

Speaker:

as a family, as a generational culture. You've been driven to an area smaller and smaller

Speaker:

and smaller. And now that is under intense bombardment, you know, a war zone. And now it's like, do

Speaker:

you leave knowing the pattern of behavior, knowing Gaza is like the last bit, along with the West

Speaker:

Bank, the last bit, you know, hopefully not forever from the river to the sea, you know,

Speaker:

eventually Palestine will be free, but right now that's all it is. And if you leave, that's

Speaker:

it. You're leaving it to Israeli settlers. And will you ever get it back? Like it's been many,

Speaker:

many years since those original borders have existed with many attempts to regain some of

Speaker:

that territory, right? And so I can't imagine facing that choice as- And it's the urgency

Speaker:

of- Of mother. We either resist now or-

Speaker:

I don't, there's no waiting. There's no waiting to resist in the future or to wait to be hopeful

Speaker:

for a change in the future if you don't resist now. Absolutely, you don't wanna think about

Speaker:

what that or was, did you, you didn't wanna finish that. We always want hope, right? And

Speaker:

we always wanna cling on to hope, but hope comes with the act of resistance. That is a wrap

Speaker:

on another episode of Blueprints of Disruption. Thank you for joining us. Also, a very big

Speaker:

thank you to the producer of our show, Santiago Jaluc Quintero. Blueprints of Disruption is

Speaker:

an independent production operated cooperatively. You can follow us on Twitter at BPofDisruption.

Speaker:

If you'd like to help us continue disrupting the status quo, please share our content. And

Speaker:

if you have the means, consider becoming a patron. Not only does our support come from the progressive

Speaker:

community, so does our content. So reach out to us and let us know what or who we should

Speaker:

be amplifying. So until next time, keep disrupting.