Greetings, friends. My name is Jess McLean, and I'm here to provide you with some blueprints
Speaker:of disruption. This weekly podcast is dedicated to amplifying the work of activists, examining
Speaker:power structures, and sharing the success stories from the grassroots. Through these discussions,
Speaker:we hope to provide folks with the tools and the inspiration they need to start to dismantle
Speaker:capitalism, decolonize our spaces, and bring about the political revolution that we know
Speaker:we need. Okay, so earlier you would claim that like it's illegal to occupy or to march on
Speaker:the street. So here's the thing, we allow it, we give you that, we use our discretion to
Speaker:allow it. actually, it is still there's not. not allowed to march on the street. Also, it's
Speaker:critical infrastructure. is downtown Toronto. There's hospitals. There's a lot of major roads
Speaker:that use roads. Street is a major throwaway to other hospitals. What is the legal basis
Speaker:of this? Because it's not supported by the criminal code. It's the highway traffic. That's if you're
Speaker:blocking the road. It's not if you're like... It doesn't matter. No, if you're moving. is.
Speaker:Listen, just get on the road. Just get on the sidewalk, guys. I know it's probably going
Speaker:to on the sidewalk. You're spread yourselves out. You're going have to tell your people.
Speaker:What you just heard was our next guest Ben Nolan talking to a Toronto police officer during
Speaker:a vigil to honour five Al Jazeera journalists murdered by Israel in Gaza. He's telling Ben
Speaker:that the ability to march in the streets of Toronto is entirely up to police. He cites
Speaker:the Highway Traffic Act. That isn't true, but this kind of interaction is becoming quite
Speaker:typical. In fact, Ben's got a laundry list of apparent policy changes at TPS that no one
Speaker:wants to admit to, but that are certainly being deployed on protesters. He's witnessed them
Speaker:firsthand. And like many of us, he's frustrated with the lobsided reporting that parrots the
Speaker:police bullshit and maligns the Palestinian Solidarity Movement. Well, one particular media
Speaker:spot with the chief of police got him really riled up. justifiably, so he wrote a piece
Speaker:about it for The Grind. And just to come full circle a little bit, after we recorded the
Speaker:discussion you're about to hear, Ben let me know that he was actually inspired by something
Speaker:he heard The Grind's publisher and editorial director, Dave Gray Donald, say in one of our
Speaker:interviews with him back in October 2024. It was about taking responsibility for reporting
Speaker:from within the movements themselves. To not leave it up to mainstream media to represent
Speaker:these very important moments, particularly when it comes to dealing with the police. It
Speaker:felt good knowing our show played a tiny role in all of that. The piece Ben wrote is great.
Speaker:It's linked in the show notes, along with some other resources that are part of the discussion.
Speaker:We also link related episodes there. If you're really up for binge listening, you can also
Speaker:check out the playlists we've got posted up to our sub stack. I want to thank T for maintaining
Speaker:that space so well for us. Please check it out. Now let's meet Ben. Good morning, Ben. Hi,
Speaker:Jessalyn. How's it going? It's good. I'm glad to have you back in the studio. It's been a
Speaker:while. I had to scroll way back. So you will have to reintroduce yourself to our friends
Speaker:here. Hi, my name is Benjamin Nolan. I'm an activist and organizer based in North Toronto.
Speaker:I've worked with a bunch of the different orgs that have been involved in the Palestine Solidarity
Speaker:Movement, but I'm not representing or speaking for any of them in this interview or with the
Speaker:article that we're talking about. I will say that my kind of organizational home right now
Speaker:is a little collective called the Mutual Aid Direct Action North Toronto Collective, Mad
Speaker:Ant Collective. can find us on Instagram, although we're trying to really focus on in-person stuff
Speaker:so we don't have a huge online presence but we'll post a link to that but you know you're
Speaker:gonna have to come back in the studio with your comrades there and talk about Stitchin' Bitchin'
Speaker:Bitchin' Stitchin' because yeah we need more mutual aid episodes like real how-to's because
Speaker:it's amazing what people can just get up and start doing on their own but You didn't list
Speaker:one of the reasons I brought you into the studio today. You didn't say you were a journalist
Speaker:or a writer. I mean, you may not consider yourself as such, but you just finished writing something
Speaker:for The Grind in their summer issue. Please support The Grind. um They do some great work
Speaker:and Ben, now you are amongst that great work. Although it's maddening. I usually don't call
Speaker:people in here for like really uplifting articles that they've written. Although you give us
Speaker:some tools. It's about the Toronto police. The Toronto police chief went on a radio show
Speaker:and Ben, you did just really a great job of not, it wasn't just a commentary on how poorly
Speaker:he did on that show or the lies that he told, but it opens up so many em cans of worms around
Speaker:police violence at protests, project resolutes, you know, the collusion between Toronto council,
Speaker:police and media. whether intentional or not, it's intentional. So let's kind of unpack
Speaker:some of that. But as you stated at the beginning, you knew the police chief was going to call
Speaker:into talk radio shows, so you weren't going to miss it. I mean, a friend of mine who monitors
Speaker:police socials uh noticed them shouting out that this was going to happen. I forget whether
Speaker:it was Chief Demkew's account or whether it was like one of the other TPS. uh, like public
Speaker:relations accounts, but they'd shouted out that this was going to happen and that people should
Speaker:prepare their questions and call in. I mean, I'd imagine that they thought, you know, news
Speaker:talk 10 10, you know, it's an audience that like judging from the other questions that
Speaker:got through is mostly, you know, like kind of, think probably lower rich suburban driver types.
Speaker:was lots of questions about like, I don't know how dastardly pedestrians are in. when you're
Speaker:trying to turn right and they get in your way. The Nimbies love them, right? Yeah, yeah,
Speaker:yeah. So I mean, think I think Demke thought that this is going to be a very friendly venue
Speaker:for him to open himself up to public questions. And I think a lot of us took an independent
Speaker:interest in, know, in seeing how this is going to play out and in trying to call in. I mean,
Speaker:I tried to call in, I got screened out by the screener. I wondered that and I teased you
Speaker:about it because there's a Ben quoted at the end of your article. I'm like, you didn't even
Speaker:try. You couldn't have used it. I mean, that's not me. have not, you know, yet and thankfully
Speaker:been subjected to the neon neck technique. But I do actually know who that is. And I mean,
Speaker:I think that he's fine with my letting you know who it is. It's Adam Melanson, who was attacked
Speaker:by the cops, I think, in I think it was November of 2023 at um a protest. And, you know, it's
Speaker:funny, he told me, cause I reached out to him, you know, once I knew that I was going to be
Speaker:writing this article to ask him about like what his experience was of getting on the air. He
Speaker:actually had tried to call in under his real name and gave the screener his real question
Speaker:and immediately got told to kind of take a hike politely. um So then he tried to call back
Speaker:again, told them his name was Ben and... said that his question was going to be about how
Speaker:TPS can hire top talent considering like the hiring initiatives in Peel region, which, you
Speaker:know, is like obviously a question that the public is deeply concerned with and would want
Speaker:to hear about. Yes, yes. Because it's not very often folks get to go face to face with the
Speaker:police chief and ask some really hard questions. And you say a few of you were following it
Speaker:personally. Why? you know, state the obvious, say the quiet part out loud. You knew what
Speaker:he would do. I've had a bit of a front row seat to some of the big incidents of police violence
Speaker:over the last couple of years. Um, I mean, one of the things that really kind of like motivated
Speaker:me to get a lot more involved in the movement was I was at the Avenue 401. Uh, it was a vigil,
Speaker:like a kind of like silent protest walk that a few folks had organized to protest. The ban
Speaker:that the police had arbitrarily put on protesting at the Avenue 401 Overpass on the basis of
Speaker:the false claims by Cija and other orgs that this is an exclusively Jewish neighbourhood
Speaker:and that the protest was targeting a Jewish neighbourhood. Obviously not true. These were
Speaker:banner drops that were modelled on similar banner drops that were done by Ukraine solidarity
Speaker:activists, obviously to no complaints, to raise awareness about You what was happening
Speaker:in Gaza and Canada's complicity in it. I mean, it was targeting like raising awareness for
Speaker:drivers on the 401. They tended to happen on Saturdays. I don't know. And I mean, it's not
Speaker:a Jewish neighborhood. It's a diverse neighborhood. It's a neighborhood that I live in. It's a
Speaker:neighborhood who's, I mean, I the closest religious institution to the overpass is a Catholic church.
Speaker:So I don't know. I mean, I felt. pre-activated by the police just arbitrarily declaring a
Speaker:no protest zone in my neighbourhood. So I showed up to this and there was maybe like 20 of us
Speaker:and we were met by, I mean, what looked like hundreds of cops. It was probably like 60 or
Speaker:something like that. I think we shared the video of the incident in the article. Yeah. And we
Speaker:talked about this a little bit when you were on the show with some of your comrades there
Speaker:from the area. Yeah. Yeah. And I mean, the police basically just hyped up, attacked us, uh shoving
Speaker:people to like icy ground, shoving people into the on-ramp lane we had been on the sidewalk
Speaker:uh and causing a number of injuries. I think three people went to the hospital. Three people
Speaker:were arrested on charges that were dropped because they were baseless and a huge excess of police
Speaker:authority. so, yeah, so I, you know, I was also at the jail support rally that had happened
Speaker:on September 11th of 2024. which as the grant reported, like essentially was a police caused
Speaker:riot. I mean, I was like, I'd gone, I'd driven down just to drop off some water, dropped off
Speaker:the water, went to park my car, walked back and there was tear gas everywhere. There was
Speaker:like people being punched in the face by the cops. There was like just total mayhem. um
Speaker:So yeah, so mean, this is why I was motivated to talk to the chief, unlike Heather Reisman.
Speaker:who, as the breach reported, has Myron Demke on a direct line and can call whenever she
Speaker:wants. That's not a thing anyone, think, in the regular public has access to. It's really
Speaker:remarkable, I think, that he's been totally insulated from not only just regular movement
Speaker:participants in the city, but movement leaders. I know that there have been lots of attempts
Speaker:to sort of reach out and try to have a conversation about this. like the hyper policing of these
Speaker:protests and there's just been no, like there's been no way to access these powerful people.
Speaker:mean, even, I think I had an opportunity to ask Olivia Chow. I think we've all seen that
Speaker:video. Yeah, like what the fuck is going on? And she basically said that the police aren't
Speaker:her response. She doesn't have any power with police. I don't know. I don't know who they're
Speaker:accountable to. Apparently Heather Reisman. What let's while you just describe the violence
Speaker:you saw firsthand, plus we've seen and read about Adam's account. We will link a lot of
Speaker:these kind of references in the show notes for folks to see for themselves. But let's quickly
Speaker:then contrast that to the responses the chief gave of how he feels his officers have responded
Speaker:in these matters, right? So he, you do get, or maybe you don't, but people do call in
Speaker:and press. And what was his take? Like, what did he try to sell to 1010 Radio audience?
Speaker:Yeah. So actually the first caller that got through, um, was someone else that I actually
Speaker:recognized from the protest movement. Her name is Liz and she's often been involved in like
Speaker:marshaling or being the police liaison. And she asked him about police violence. And so,
Speaker:so she, she asked since October, 2023, it seems like the Toronto police. has been attacking
Speaker:pro-Palestine supporters, including at least two documented instances of the controversial
Speaker:neon neck technique. Dozens of people have ended up in the hospital as a result of police
Speaker:force, including broken bones, concussions, torn ligaments. And I'm just wondering, is
Speaker:the Toronto police perhaps using excessive force? So Demke's response to this was first to
Speaker:kind of downplay police violence, talking about how there have been like hundreds of quote
Speaker:unquote, planned and unplanned events that they've policed. And most of these have not resulted
Speaker:in any arrests or violence. And then he went on to say that there are occasions when they've
Speaker:had to use violence since, and of course he drops October 7th, 2023, and arrests by their
Speaker:very nature, quote, involve some amount of use of force, unquote. But we do so, and he said,
Speaker:proportionately to the circumstances each and every time. So that word proportionate really
Speaker:kind of stuck out to me because I'd been talking to the Orange Hats who'd shared or been kind
Speaker:of sharing around these numbers of injuries that they've directly documented. And I mean,
Speaker:it should be said that this list of injuries is not, like they're not claiming that this
Speaker:is every single case. You couldn't, like some people just go home after getting hurt and
Speaker:they... they don't say or do anything. exactly. And so this is just the cases that they've
Speaker:been able to sort of like confirm and document with people. over the like, basically since
Speaker:January 2024, I mean, the highlight to me is there have been 48 brain injuries caused by
Speaker:police violence of protesters. These have overwhelmingly I mean, the orange hats collect this data at,
Speaker:you know, all kinds of different protests. But overwhelmingly, these cases have been at pro
Speaker:Palestine events. Well, let's be honest, that's where most of the violence is reserved for.
Speaker:Right. That and Indigenous-led protests. Yeah, although, I I have to say I've been at a bunch
Speaker:of Indigenous protests over the past couple of years as well. And, you know, there have
Speaker:been the odd comments thrown out there by the police liaison that, like, we know you guys...
Speaker:I mean, it's bullshit, but, like, favorably contrasting... other protests to the violent,
Speaker:hateful pro-Palestine crowd, which again is like a fabrication. I don't know, maybe this
Speaker:is a good chance to read Liz's response to Demke's answer. Yeah. So I approached Liz because again,
Speaker:I recognized her voice and asked her for comment on Demke's response. And she said, quote, it's
Speaker:so hypocritical that they demand safety from the protesters when they're the ones escalating
Speaker:actions and putting people in the hospital. I haven't seen any protesters put anyone in
Speaker:the hospital. And the fact that they consider that a quote proportionate response says a
Speaker:lot about the Toronto police department. Honestly, the fact that they're blaming the victims of
Speaker:these assaults on the absolutely baseless claims of hateful actions or behavior is nonsense
Speaker:and despicable. And I mean, I just, really want to highlight that, you know, I know that there's
Speaker:like disagreements about strategy, but it has just been the case that there's been a strategic
Speaker:decision on the part. of the major movement orgs in the city to pursue a strategy of nonviolence.
Speaker:And I think the actual record of these protests has reflected that. mean, the average Habs
Speaker:playoff win or loss, I think, has resulted in more property destruction or assault or
Speaker:whatever than has been documented at almost two years of... hundreds of protests involving
Speaker:tens and tens of thousands of people. We have to ask, what is this, where is this perception
Speaker:coming from of this aura of violence that's been attached to these protests? And I mean,
Speaker:I think the answer is like, they're racialized, there's a campaign to smear them. Liz mentions
Speaker:it near the end. It's that framing of hate, hate crime, right? We often see attempts to
Speaker:add hate. related charges or aggravating factors, totally unbased, right? But that has been
Speaker:the tactic of the Zionist lobby, right? To frame just anything Palestinian as inherently
Speaker:related to terrorism. You know, you had that, I don't remember her name, I think my mind
Speaker:blocks out some of these clowns, but school trustee getting up there in front of everybody
Speaker:full chest saying, you know, wearing a kaffir. is makes her feel unsafe, makes everyone
Speaker:around them feel unsafe. it's like this. Shelly Laskin? No, she has like a hyphenated name.
Speaker:Okay. Okay. It sounds like Shelly Laskin. Well, I was just about to say it's very invasive.
Speaker:Like it's everywhere. Like it's like garlic mustard. But it's, um it underlies everything
Speaker:and provides a justification. And like you, uh highlighted something for me in the article
Speaker:that I hadn't heard uh one of the police representatives there actually calling these protests, Resolute
Speaker:protests. Because, okay, for the audience, in case you missed our like, kajillion episodes
Speaker:on the evolving lawfare being uh used against particularly Toronto protesters. there's Project
Speaker:Resolute, which uh it explicitly did say, you know, It's tasked with investigating protests
Speaker:related to the Middle East. Like they were pretty implicitly racist from the beginning, but we
Speaker:knew that really didn't just mean the Middle East. It meant Palestine specifically. And
Speaker:now they're just saying that out loud, right? Like I asked you, that a Freudian slip or what?
Speaker:Like, is that just how they refer to all of these as, it's almost like a What did you
Speaker:call it? The shorthand or like a funding code, right? Like all of this must be costing so
Speaker:much money. Like we'll get into that. But yeah. So Project Resolute is now a web of various
Speaker:kinds of police responses, right? From the harassment that goes on to activists after
Speaker:to the deployment of incredible resources on site to the networking of police. across probably
Speaker:the country at this point, but I thought that was astonishing that he got caught kind of
Speaker:calling them. I will say I don't want to take credit for that one. I was quoting from uh
Speaker:a piece that was run a couple of weeks ago in the New Arab by uh Aparajita Ghosh uh called
Speaker:Drones, No-Go Zones and Weaponized Policing Inside Project Resolute Canada's Crackdown
Speaker:on Palestine speech. So she's the one that actually reproduced that quote from the deputy
Speaker:police chief calling these quote project resolute demonstrations and protests. uh That's deputy
Speaker:police chief Rob Johnson. And she quotes him saying that in January. folks who don't understand,
Speaker:like they're approaching even a vigil for slain journalists as some sort of hate crime filled
Speaker:gathering, not just in their minds and their language, but you've seen in terms of resource
Speaker:and heavy-handed police violence. Do you want to describe what kind of deployments you're
Speaker:seeing at maybe even some of the more innocuous gatherings? know, there's consistently been
Speaker:these massive police deployments to any protest marked pro-Palestine going back to essentially
Speaker:Mayor Chao on October 9th insinuating that they're terrorists sympathizing or whatever. um It's
Speaker:been really clear that the police understanding of what they're doing is that they're protecting
Speaker:the public from these demonstrations that are a threat to it or something. They don't recognize
Speaker:the demonstrations as an expression of the public or as part of the public. mean, frankly,
Speaker:if we were to accept their line that they should be protecting, if we had it our way, they
Speaker:would just fuck off entirely. um But uh there's been a gradual increase in the demands being
Speaker:put on protests backed up by this threat of really immediate violence and force that,
Speaker:again, will almost almost certainly result in charges that will later be withdrawn as
Speaker:baseless because police are overreaching beyond any legal authority that they currently have,
Speaker:although again, rising fascism, who knows how long until they're empowered to just beat us
Speaker:arbitrarily. But yeah, I mean, you reference this vigil. This was a vigil that was held
Speaker:a couple weeks ago, immediately after the murder of Anas al-Sharif and the Al Jazeera team.
Speaker:uh in Gaza by Israel by a targeted airstrike um that was accompanied again by a smear campaign
Speaker:trying to paint this person that had been on air live every day constantly for two years
Speaker:as a quote fake journalist and as some kind of secret Hamas operative. Yeah, so anyway,
Speaker:it was a vigil to not only those slain journalists, but the I think it's like approaching 300 journalists
Speaker:that have been killed in Gaza over the last two years, which I think was recently found
Speaker:to be more journalists than were killed in like all of the major 20th century wars combined.
Speaker:um And so yeah, I was at this vigil which was held um outside the old Much Music building,
Speaker:which is kind of branded with CTV, Queen and John. Yeah, et cetera. um And I was working
Speaker:with the Marshall team and uh like before the protest or the vigil, wasn't even a it was
Speaker:a vigil. Before the vigil had been assembled. Police liaison, uh, Nerubin, backed by Roger
Speaker:Ford, approached us and basically said, you're not going to be allowed to march in the streets
Speaker:unless you tell us your route. I mean, of course it wasn't planned to be a march. So we were
Speaker:like, what are you talking about? Yeah, it's illegal for you guys to march and you get to
Speaker:do it at our pleasure. Blah, blah, blah, blah. I think we were like, listen, this is a vigil.
Speaker:We don't want this to be about confrontation with the cops. He said specifically, we have
Speaker:enough deployments to arrest everyone. So like the police response to the public wanting
Speaker:to have a vigil to journalists being murdered by an apartheid state was again, violent threats.
Speaker:And so he then approached me again as the crowd built up to the point that it started
Speaker:to spill into the street. And kind of I asked him to clarify it. Like he reiterated this
Speaker:threat and asked him to clarify it. Like what is the legal basis? that you're claiming for
Speaker:this. And he cited the fact that all streets downtown are critical infrastructure. And he
Speaker:cited the Highway Traffic Act and said explicitly that basically protests are only allowed to
Speaker:take the street at police discretion under the Highway Traffic Act. So I did some research
Speaker:and I think it's like section 141 that empowers police to direct traffic. which I guess they're
Speaker:interpreting is like crowning them absolute dictators of all streets everywhere. doesn't
Speaker:take much for them to get that green light though, right? Like any kind of encouragement. G20
Speaker:did a lot for them there. And I mean, and the Highway Traffic Act is not part of the criminal
Speaker:code. Like it's like Ontario legislation. And so essentially where that they think that that
Speaker:empowers them to criminalize people is Essentially, if you violate their directives, they can arrest
Speaker:you or charge you with obstruction. Or mischief is a common charge for folks for blocking the
Speaker:roadway. Yeah. And like you said, these charges end up getting dropped down the road. like
Speaker:just quickly, we should note that even though charges are dropped, people go through incredible
Speaker:trauma. You know, that isn't to scare folks from protesting because there's support systems.
Speaker:I mean, like you're doxxed with these police statements. You You know, have to face repercussions,
Speaker:your family, your job may find out that you've been arrested and then they add that stupid
Speaker:tagline and investigated for possible hate crimes, you know, just because you've been tagged with
Speaker:the resolute tag, right? And that's an automatic basically hate crime investigation. And then
Speaker:you have to possibly spend a few days in jail, fight bail conditions or live under awful
Speaker:bail conditions. We've told so many stories of people spending months and months or longer.
Speaker:with ridiculous bail conditions that are unconstitutional. So we've done so many episodes. That's just
Speaker:why I kind of gave the fast version there, because it's that process of punishment that they
Speaker:use. when they threaten Ben going, we have enough people to arrest you, it's not like
Speaker:they're just going to arrest you and ticket you for trust or jaywalking or whatever they
Speaker:think you're doing. They will charge you under the criminal code unjustly, because it's no
Speaker:sweat off their back at all. They move on. their arrest record and conviction record is
Speaker:not a concern for them whatsoever, right? They will just move on to the next project, Resolute
Speaker:Protest, and round them up. And I think watching London round up 500 plus people in one day
Speaker:is setting a tone as well, because you get to a certain amount of numbers and you think,
Speaker:they can't arrest us all. And then they're showing up on site saying, we absolutely fucking
Speaker:can, and we will. Did you record that? confession from that cop or that cop telling you that
Speaker:he is the law. Yeah, yeah. So I did record his clarification, which I think was really
Speaker:helpful because I interpreted that. So this happened on the Tuesday ahead of last Saturday's
Speaker:kind of big march that was meeting at Yonge and Dundas Square. I kind of interpreted this
Speaker:as essentially a shot off the bow, trying to intimidate organizers ahead of that march.
Speaker:And so we were like really wanting to try to figure out how we could push back against this
Speaker:and, you know, get it clarified, get it on the public record that there's no legal basis for
Speaker:this thing. So, you know, we showed the recording to Shane Martinez, who's a criminal law lawyer
Speaker:here in Toronto, who's defended a lot of people in the movement to folks at the criminal community
Speaker:justice collective, you know, and they were all basically unanimous in saying, There is
Speaker:no legal basis for this claim. That doesn't mean that they're not gonna arrest you, possibly
Speaker:violently, possibly sticking you with these onerous bail conditions, sticking you in like
Speaker:a cold room overnight. This must be so frustrating for lawyers, right? Like trying to advise the
Speaker:movement because everything comes with, yeah, but like in the past they wouldn't have, but
Speaker:now we don't know or by law they can't, but that means doesn't mean they won't. And they
Speaker:brag about... the arrest numbers. like to them, I remember on the anniversary of October 7th,
Speaker:October 7th, 2024, think Demeque issued this long statement, you know, which was directed
Speaker:towards the small minority in Toronto that are aggressively pro-Israel, reassuring them that
Speaker:like, look, look how much we're protecting you. Look how many people we are violently arresting.
Speaker:So to them, the arrest numbers are themselves a thing that they can kind of make bank off
Speaker:of. And it doesn't matter that the arrests later get thrown out as baseless. You know, it doesn't
Speaker:matter that people's reputations get ruined, not only because of just the press releases
Speaker:that get like stenographically reproduced by CP24, City News, et cetera, with no follow-up,
Speaker:no investigation. Which, know, again, it's not like necessarily the journalists themselves
Speaker:fault. They're under these like crazy strict deadlines. They don't have time to do actual
Speaker:reporting. But I mean, maybe we need to recognize that this news is coming from people that don't
Speaker:have time to do actual reporting. And, you know, that should be an asterisk next to absolutely
Speaker:everything that appears in these, on these websites, you know, and then these get picked up by
Speaker:activists, like pro genocide activists that see any expression of dissent against Israel's
Speaker:genocide against Canada's support for Israel's genocide as something that is convictable
Speaker:immediately. And they launched these campaigns to like disparage and um get people fired and
Speaker:get people harassed. And I mean, I believe that the police know this and this is why I
Speaker:know that at the Legal Support Committee, they have like the process of the punishment as
Speaker:a bit of a mantra. You know, basically the presumption of innocence doesn't exist, you
Speaker:know? I just want to interject for a second because you said something about pro-Israeli
Speaker:activists picking up on these releases. I would suggest they are fed to them. Because we know,
Speaker:like, we've had an episode on Project Resolute itself and the people that are actually running
Speaker:it. within the Ontario Attorney General's office. And we know that there's been cases where they
Speaker:have had contacts inside the Israeli embassy well before anybody else could. And so I
Speaker:would suggest there is a pipeline of charges to those that would dox HonestReporting.com
Speaker:or whatever it is. they, this is not just someone like waiting for police feeds and getting lucky
Speaker:and finding things. I'm imagining. It's fed to them and just to double back again on them
Speaker:bragging about their arrests, that's not just for the folks that you mentioned. It's the
Speaker:only way to justify the means to the next one, right? And their budget, right? You can't just
Speaker:keep deploying hundreds of officers and then go back and have no arrests, right? Because
Speaker:over and over, it's one thing to be like, oh, you we were ultra cautious. And then look,
Speaker:we had to arrest 12 people. So let's be extra. cautious, extra deployed. Next time, let's
Speaker:get more bells and whistles, new training, more drones, you know, all of it. just it snowballs,
Speaker:right? Because every time they manifest these arrests, it just justifies even more spending,
Speaker:which is more police violence, which is even more arrests. And because they won't ever
Speaker:be satisfied with with their budget or their growth, right? So it's just a feeding frenzy.
Speaker:Well, and then it becomes it becomes a resource sink for the movement to fight all of these
Speaker:all of these kind of petty things that again, I mean, it's it's it's like kind of effective
Speaker:counterinsurgency being pushed by again, these activists supporting the genocide that's being
Speaker:committed with Canadian complicity in Gaza. You know, suddenly we're like only we're talking
Speaker:about and we're focused on like getting these unjust charges thrown out. The story is about
Speaker:this police response or whether or not the police are responding to us. You know, poses external
Speaker:threat well enough, you know, whatever, when it's people that are out there protesting the
Speaker:genocide that's being committed in our name. And like, again, any excuse to sort of bury
Speaker:that headline is something that I think the police are deeply complicit in participating
Speaker:in, you know, suppressing. I can see why you were so eager to tune in and fact check this
Speaker:shit. It's astonishing that the mainstream media isn't. We did mention this with another guest
Speaker:where it's just how many times have they been provided evidence, like Adam's case is probably
Speaker:one of the best ones, where multiple outlets were there to witness his beating and then
Speaker:arrest. And actually... published something along the lines of, actually, you know, according
Speaker:to a global, you know, global news cameraman on site, but that often does not happen. Like
Speaker:they just happen to get lucky and they were there. They do not seek out the other story.
Speaker:So we brought in a gur from the movement media hub, right? And he talks about using similar
Speaker:tactics as the police. Like he didn't say they were similar, but I'm drawing the similarities
Speaker:where like you were just feeding the press what they need, your own your own police report,
Speaker:you know, it's not a mugshot and whatnot, but it's everything, all the counterpoints that
Speaker:any journalist might need to tell at least half of that other side of the story. And still
Speaker:it's hard to get traction that way. You know what I mean? So there's this inherent bias,
Speaker:even when it's made easy for the journalists. So, so to pick up on the story following up
Speaker:from the vigil, I had that recording and we saw this again as a shot off the bow warning
Speaker:us essentially that they're going to be even more. draconian uh on Saturday at the big march.
Speaker:uh You know, recently they've taken to demanding protest routes uh and saying and enforcing
Speaker:this completely bullshit rule that if the protest stops for like a speaker or something like
Speaker:that, if it stops for more than five minutes, that's against the law or something like
Speaker:that. This is the line that's being enforced, especially by Roger Ford, as I've seen, but
Speaker:I mean, I know it's also been the case with some others. And so we wanted to kind of like
Speaker:do some pushback on that. And so we gave the recording to some reporters at the Star who
Speaker:said they were kind of interested in running a story on this policy change on the part of
Speaker:the cops. A couple of us had been prepared to like give interviews to them. They said
Speaker:they wanted to reach out to the cops first and get their statement. Of course. Yeah. And the
Speaker:police denied that there's been any policy change. And also said of of Nourubin, the police liaison
Speaker:that I recorded, that he, I forget exactly what the word was. think that he had misstated or
Speaker:misled us about the law. Well, Nourubin can't show up as police liaison to any resolute protest
Speaker:now, can he? Yeah. If you face him, you're going like, you have no credibility son. Like you
Speaker:have none. Your boys in blue won't even back you. Yeah. mean, again, as- As some of the
Speaker:lawyers I talked to said, mean, police talk, police don't know the law and they don't care
Speaker:to know the law because it's not their business to know the law. They have this power to do
Speaker:these arrests on the basis of whatever they decide the law is. And then it's for the courts
Speaker:to figure it out later at the public's expense. I mean, this is not cheap. It's not cheap to
Speaker:like, you know, baselessly put like place charges on. At this point, I 133 or more uh protest
Speaker:participants that are overwhelmingly either going to be thrown out or result in discharges,
Speaker:which is to say not convictions, which is again the other, I think, major piece of news that
Speaker:got kind of broken in this, which is that like so far these arrests haven't resulted in any
Speaker:convictions at all. Now, I mean, I don't. I don't expect that to hold up forever. they're
Speaker:gonna, the court system is extremely hostile to Palestine solidarity. They're part of the
Speaker:Canadian state that is supporting this genocide. And so, I mean, I think eventually they're
Speaker:gonna come up with some conviction and then at that point it'll be like one out of 133,
Speaker:right? Oh, and they will blow that one case up when they can, right? Like it's, I keep
Speaker:thinking back to, London and you know I was just reading some discourse around those arrests
Speaker:like 500 or more at one action is just like fucking astonishing but you hear a lot of people
Speaker:talking about oh you police are just following orders you know you're talking about folks
Speaker:you've got the Nuremberg defense yeah yeah like I don't know if they hear it when they say
Speaker:it out loud but it was genuine pushback against like vilifying actual police officers. So like
Speaker:the folks you're naming here are decision makers, Deputy police chiefs, police liaisons and
Speaker:whatnot. But a lot of some of the tactics that folks have employed in LA is another example,
Speaker:but in the UK as well is documenting each and every police officer at these actions in an
Speaker:attempt to shame them, hold them accountable, document it. I mean, there's probably a multitude
Speaker:of reasons why people are doing it. How are you feeling about, you know, pushing back against
Speaker:police? I mean, I think it's, you know, by whatever means that we can do, I think we need
Speaker:to sort of figure out how to, um, like call out and push back against this overreach. mean,
Speaker:to the extent that Canada wants to pretend that it's democracy, like this is completely inconsistent
Speaker:with that. I think that like the key thing right now is just to understand like the processes.
Speaker:by which the decisions about these things are getting made. I mean, I don't know. mean,
Speaker:TPS denied to the star that there's been a policy change, although we did still see an expression
Speaker:of an apparent policy change at the level of the street on Saturday, where they did enforce
Speaker:the demand for the route, where they did enforce this bullshit five minute restriction and where
Speaker:they had an absolutely massive deployment, including of course, their like horses. that they had
Speaker:used to trample all over protesters at the land day march in March of 2024. And which actually,
Speaker:you it's funny on the radio call in show, I don't think this made it into the article,
Speaker:but there was a question about, actually there were two questions that were led through about
Speaker:public drug use. You know, and obviously like the end to the safe injection sites program
Speaker:was never talked about by either Carol or by... Demp Q, no, m but Carol did mention that they
Speaker:had tried trampling over the encampments with horses and funnily enough that didn't work.
Speaker:So actually, I think you can find a recording of the whole episode linked to from the article
Speaker:if you want to hear that snippet. I mean, I think the whole thing is worth listening to.
Speaker:It is as long as you have something there to help center you, because I imagine it's quite
Speaker:maddening to hear these two, you know, even the photo that you've used there where they're
Speaker:hugging one another. And it's just you mentioned her and I forgot to I have Fuck Shelly Carroll
Speaker:in my notes here. So um the complicit in the cooperation that Toronto Council is giving
Speaker:all of this, most namely in the form of a bubble zone law, like whether or not that applies
Speaker:to any of the confrontations that you're kind of talking about or not, it's just like this
Speaker:other another tool that's been given to the police, almost very specifically to counter
Speaker:pro-Palestinian protests and embolden them. right, to give them even more ability to
Speaker:cordon off areas, no-go zones, and restrict the movement of protesters. Have you kind
Speaker:of felt the impacts of that? I mean, when it came, we talked to the Orange Hats, and they
Speaker:were great in saying, know, giving us plenty of examples of they already create bubble zones.
Speaker:You talked about one on the overpass. When they want to make one, they'll make one. But now
Speaker:it's, you know, there's a hundred thousand dollar possible fine. And then, you know, Carney's
Speaker:talking about adding it to the criminal code. But are you finding cops emboldened by that
Speaker:or utilizing it all? mean, I haven't heard them specifically invoke it yet. I'd imagine
Speaker:that would change if it does get added to the criminal code because suddenly then it becomes
Speaker:their problem in a big way. I mean, I think that the TPS response to the legislation, which
Speaker:by the way, like their own legal counsel said was not constitutional, which their public
Speaker:consent manufacturing exercise. 97%. Yeah, everyone said they don't want this. But I mean, TPS's
Speaker:response was we already basically do this. So this isn't going to change anything. And I
Speaker:mean, again, like the key kind of reference incident for this. Was a fucking fiction.
Speaker:was the, there was that hands off Rafa march in February of 2024, which went from the Israeli
Speaker:consulate to the US consulate, which is on lower university. Hospital row. Yeah. So essentially
Speaker:the march, I think went along college. And then if I remember right, the police actually directed
Speaker:the march down the university. Yes, they did. And then there was this guy named Spider-Man
Speaker:for Palestine that had been climbing lampposts and like- That's not his real name. You know,
Speaker:whatever. Yeah, yeah. He'd been like climbing, you know, climbing buildings and waving the-
Speaker:Scaffolding, usually. All the way down the protest route. Of course, there was one short, I think,
Speaker:17-second clip of him climbing on Mount Sinai for a photo op for one second. The protest
Speaker:did not stop, but this got picked up on by like- Weinstein by then Cija and all these other
Speaker:orgs to claim that the protest had, quote, targeted Mount Sinai Hospital, a line that
Speaker:was then validated by the entire political establishment, including fucking Jagmeet Singh, who, incidentally,
Speaker:I bumped into shortly before the election in Kensington Market. He was just driving his
Speaker:bike or whatever. And I asked him, like, why didn't you retract this once it became clear
Speaker:this was a lie? And he said that he just like laughed it off and said, I don't, I don't remember.
Speaker:You know, lots of things have happened. It's not significant to him. It's not significant
Speaker:to him. And yet this is this key reference point. This entire, this fiction for painting the
Speaker:protests as a violent and as targeting quote, a historically Jewish hospital that is a public
Speaker:hospital. that like most of us are patients at in one form or another. feel like I think
Speaker:my like I have a specialist that's at Mount Sinai. I like use my, why would we target a
Speaker:hospital? know? The shit people got away with, we didn't plan on talking about this, but
Speaker:there's no way. I think it was Lisa MacLeod and I might be wrong. Oh, who said that they'd
Speaker:infiltrated? Yes, that they were like attacking Jewish doctors and patients inside the hospital.
Speaker:That entrance was closed. It had been closed for hours. Yeah. Yeah. Oh, no, we go off
Speaker:on that on this show here because just for the reason you say it was for so many, it's a
Speaker:moment that's referenced by our enemies many times, and it just kind of helps set policy,
Speaker:even though they would have grabbed onto anything. But it also for me, it was like the ridiculousness
Speaker:of ever trying to manage the narrative by adjusting your parade route. Sorry. Your march. route
Speaker:or, uh you know, worrying about how this might be perceived by the press ahead of time when
Speaker:you can do something just so simple as, you know, dress in a costume and climb on something
Speaker:and that changes the trajectory in a way. But yeah, it was like, it doesn't matter what
Speaker:you do, they will come up with a story and twist it and it will be used to feed that narrative
Speaker:that anything Palestinian is inherently violent, like just so explicitly racist. Yeah. And I
Speaker:mean, it wasn't like the the sort of escalation of police, like police efforts to dominate
Speaker:the protests had started before this. So you know that they were like waiting on an opportunity
Speaker:and they validated every bullshit narrative about this, even though they were on scene,
Speaker:they know exactly what had happened. But They'd already kind of signaled that their priority
Speaker:was to crack down on the protest. think in January of 2024 was when they started to like really
Speaker:try to police uh the truck, you know, the truck that usually leads the protest with the speaker.
Speaker:like they started to demand that the driver give their driver's license. They started to
Speaker:like, it decided that they needed to get to do a full check that all the speakers were
Speaker:locked down that. No one was riding in the bed of the truck uh while it was moving at
Speaker:five kilometers per hour, threatening that they would arrest you for like, I think stunt driving,
Speaker:which is again an arrest that they then made on like one month later. Impounded. Impounding
Speaker:the trunk for fucking stunt driving for just like going with five kilometers per hour up
Speaker:the street. Obviously this legislation was intended to empower police to like uh stop. like illegal
Speaker:drag racing like Fast and the Furious style. It has no relevance to this and yet this
Speaker:is again the pretext that they're using on the ground to justify using these like excessive
Speaker:measures to try to intimidate and put costs on people before there's any kind of actual
Speaker:judicial evaluation of whether that's legitimate. And there's apparently no feedback mechanism
Speaker:because when the courts tell them that it's not, it doesn't change their behavior. And
Speaker:that's not a scandal because we don't have an independent press except for like these tiny
Speaker:exceptions like the grind, the breach, know, the maple, Samira Moyadid, you know, there's
Speaker:these tiny exceptions that don't have like huge audiences. They're pretty effectively restricted
Speaker:in their reach by social media, et cetera. um But like, again, like the journalists are not
Speaker:pressing back on this and there's no will on the part of these major media outlets to be
Speaker:aggressive with this stuff. And again, the burden of proof that we're dealing with to register
Speaker:anything in those venues is like as high as Everest. Whereas if you're a pro-Israel genocide
Speaker:fear monger, you literally don't have to, you can make shit up and it gets run, you know?
Speaker:Or corrected. Yeah. What was the latest maddening? I believe it was the Globe and Mail made a
Speaker:correction labeling Gaza's starvation. was forced starvation. They corrected that it was that
Speaker:that was an overstatement or something like that. I think I saw that on the show yesterday.
Speaker:Yeah, through that pressure that you're talking about, you know, and that we've talked about
Speaker:too on the show. So when they want to influence the story in the same way, you know, we bombard
Speaker:MPs and MPPs with phone calls and emails and some facts. They're at these newsrooms, right?
Speaker:Going, you didn't print it the way that we wanted to be printed, here's the correction, or ahead
Speaker:of time, you know? I mean, if they were only bombarding the newsrooms, I don't think that
Speaker:it would have the impact that it obviously has, because we're also, to some extent, bombarding
Speaker:the newsrooms. That's right, that inherent bias is there already. Yeah, we're not, like, we're
Speaker:not, like, when we call bullshit on some- And when we organize people to call or message
Speaker:or email, it doesn't have the same effect. So I mean, at the end of the day, it's it's there's
Speaker:a lot of shit happening behind the scenes in terms of the power elite in this country that
Speaker:is like pretty, you know, it just renders ludicrous the idea that Canada is a fucking
Speaker:democracy. It's not a democracy. know, oh, you drop that bomb at the end of the episode. I
Speaker:don't know. I'm just angry that there's like, you know, we just had an election and there's
Speaker:no. viable electoral option that has a serious proposal. I'm feeling every word. Yeah, that
Speaker:has a serious proposal to address the biggest, like, housing environment stuff, like climate
Speaker:changes, like, who can you vote for that will, like... I don't care. I don't really care anymore
Speaker:because that's not the most effective way, but it just for people listening at the beginning
Speaker:of the show, you know, there's a chant like, is what democracy looks like. Most of the time
Speaker:that is, like, facetious. You know, like I am sometimes demonstrating the worst of democracy,
Speaker:but also, you know, us in the streets, I think is better example of what democracy, you know,
Speaker:could and should look like. uh Mob rule is something that, you know, people have such fear of. But
Speaker:of course, when you when you frame it that way. have fear of the fact that that Heather
Speaker:Reisman, who literally redirects Canadian tax credits to directly support the Israeli military
Speaker:currently committing genocide has a direct line to, you know, the police, the chief of police,
Speaker:whenever she wants. And we have to ambush him on a call in show because no matter what
Speaker:we try, we can't get through. can't register as like people that are valid members of
Speaker:the Canadian public, you know. uh And this again has been a strategy, like there's been an aggressive
Speaker:strategy on the part of the pro-Israel lobby too. You know, at their rallies, they'll always
Speaker:be waving the Israeli flag and the Canadian flag. And then they'll, you know, call for
Speaker:the deportation, you know, of anyone involved in Palestine protest, implying that we're all
Speaker:foreign agitators. I mean, I'm, I'm Métis, I'm not foreign to this. I mean, like, technically
Speaker:this, like, whatever my homeland is the Red River or whatever, it's not true. So in that
Speaker:sense, I guess I'm foreign in Toronto, fine, deport me to Winnipeg. But like, but there,
Speaker:you know, if you look again at these pro-Israel protests that happened, they're overwhelmingly
Speaker:white. And there is an aggressive attempt to racialize and play on the racism of Canadian
Speaker:society to rationalize, again, criminalizing and using violence against these protests
Speaker:that again have been overwhelmingly peaceful, you for better or worse. Which is why those
Speaker:lines sell so easily, right? In the ridiculousness of the Spider-Man and the Mount Sinai, or just
Speaker:the simple descriptions of these protests as hateful and disrupt- well, I would love for
Speaker:them to be disruptive, but that has connotations for most, you know, Canadians. And so it's
Speaker:quite easy for them to then look at these two sides and kind of be maybe unsure. or they're
Speaker:buying it hook, line and sinker, right? They may believe in the Palestinian cause, but that
Speaker:doesn't mean they're not still looking at the resistance movement here as inherently violent
Speaker:because of what the media is telling them, right? What the police is telling them. And
Speaker:that makes them perhaps reluctant to lean into the movement in the way that they could. So
Speaker:yeah, it has detrimental impact even when people know, you know, right from wrong, maybe globally.
Speaker:And I know we're moving people on Zionism as being untenable, as unsustainable, as wrong.
Speaker:But how we feel about protests is still not very good, right? Like people hated the convoy
Speaker:for obvious reasons. And then now folks are looking at other forms of protest as just too
Speaker:disruptive. know, even a strike, Air Canada workers, you know, not everybody was with them
Speaker:because it was going to disrupt our economy. uh So I think there's a little bit of work
Speaker:to be done, you know, to counter that. And I'm glad that you're doing that kind of work to
Speaker:call them on this bullshit and reframe it. Have you had a response, any notable response from
Speaker:the article? Like, police chief call you? Yeah, I mean, not too much. Like, I know that it's
Speaker:been generally well received in kind of activist circles. I mean, to me, the most important
Speaker:thing was to just provide a venue to register some of these facts. that then can be uh referenced
Speaker:by others because, know, like that just despite the efforts of groups like the Orange Hats
Speaker:or groups like the Legal Support Committee to get these things registered in the media, it
Speaker:just hasn't, they've been met with stonewalls. that's what's been important. And so I'm hoping
Speaker:that it has a positive impact kind of in the longer term. I mean, just like The Grind,
Speaker:I think published that account of what actually happened at Mount Sinai Hospital. that to me
Speaker:has been really valuable to like reference in the future, like to reference on an ongoing
Speaker:basis to blow up this myth that keeps being brought up to justify these crackdowns. I'm
Speaker:hoping that this can be helpful for that in the future. It already has been. So thank you.
Speaker:I will link it in the show notes for folks to read it in full. But again, yeah, please support
Speaker:folks like The Grind and The Maple. They are really going above and beyond in these times
Speaker:to kind of get the truth out there. Everyone's doing every little bit that they can on every
Speaker:imaginable front. Ben, you're one of those people. appreciate the tidbits of wisdom. You drop
Speaker:me a line every now and again and I get a scoop or whatnot. And I do appreciate you keeping
Speaker:in touch with the show and keeping us updated as well. Thank you. Thanks, Jessa. I mean,
Speaker:I really think that you're doing the Lord's work. I, I, I, these stories, again, I wish
Speaker:not even just for like audience growth sake. mean, like they're just, everyone should hear
Speaker:them. Cause like sometimes my measure is telling my mom and getting her reaction. And I imagine
Speaker:that would be most, um, mainstream Canadians actions. Like what? No, they didn't, you know,
Speaker:like that, they can't do that. And you know, I. If I could just generate that feeling
Speaker:in as many people as possible paired with the what can I do about it? And then, uh yes, I
Speaker:will feel like we're being productive. um But yeah, I can't do it without the guests. So
Speaker:thanks again. And until next time. Cheers, Jessa. That is a wrap on another episode of
Speaker:Blueprints of Disruption. Thank you for joining us. Blueprints of Disruption is an independent
Speaker:production operated cooperatively. You can follow us on Twitter at BPofDisruption. If you'd like
Speaker:to help us continue disrupting the status quo, please share our content. And if you have the
Speaker:means, consider becoming a patron. Not only does our support come from the progressive
Speaker:community, so does our content. So reach out to us and let us know what or who we should
Speaker:be amplifying. So until next time, keep disrupting.