Speaker:

Greetings, friends. My name is Jess McLean, and I'm here to provide you with some blueprints

Speaker:

of disruption. This weekly podcast is dedicated to amplifying the work of activists, examining

Speaker:

power structures, and sharing the success stories from the grassroots. Through these discussions,

Speaker:

we hope to provide folks with the tools and the inspiration they need to start to dismantle

Speaker:

capitalism, decolonize our spaces, and bring about the political revolution that we know

Speaker:

we need. Okay, so earlier you would claim that like it's illegal to occupy or to march on

Speaker:

the street. So here's the thing, we allow it, we give you that, we use our discretion to

Speaker:

allow it. actually, it is still there's not. not allowed to march on the street. Also, it's

Speaker:

critical infrastructure. is downtown Toronto. There's hospitals. There's a lot of major roads

Speaker:

that use roads. Street is a major throwaway to other hospitals. What is the legal basis

Speaker:

of this? Because it's not supported by the criminal code. It's the highway traffic. That's if you're

Speaker:

blocking the road. It's not if you're like... It doesn't matter. No, if you're moving. is.

Speaker:

Listen, just get on the road. Just get on the sidewalk, guys. I know it's probably going

Speaker:

to on the sidewalk. You're spread yourselves out. You're going have to tell your people.

Speaker:

What you just heard was our next guest Ben Nolan talking to a Toronto police officer during

Speaker:

a vigil to honour five Al Jazeera journalists murdered by Israel in Gaza. He's telling Ben

Speaker:

that the ability to march in the streets of Toronto is entirely up to police. He cites

Speaker:

the Highway Traffic Act. That isn't true, but this kind of interaction is becoming quite

Speaker:

typical. In fact, Ben's got a laundry list of apparent policy changes at TPS that no one

Speaker:

wants to admit to, but that are certainly being deployed on protesters. He's witnessed them

Speaker:

firsthand. And like many of us, he's frustrated with the lobsided reporting that parrots the

Speaker:

police bullshit and maligns the Palestinian Solidarity Movement. Well, one particular media

Speaker:

spot with the chief of police got him really riled up. justifiably, so he wrote a piece

Speaker:

about it for The Grind. And just to come full circle a little bit, after we recorded the

Speaker:

discussion you're about to hear, Ben let me know that he was actually inspired by something

Speaker:

he heard The Grind's publisher and editorial director, Dave Gray Donald, say in one of our

Speaker:

interviews with him back in October 2024. It was about taking responsibility for reporting

Speaker:

from within the movements themselves. To not leave it up to mainstream media to represent

Speaker:

these very important moments, particularly when it comes to dealing with the police. It

Speaker:

felt good knowing our show played a tiny role in all of that. The piece Ben wrote is great.

Speaker:

It's linked in the show notes, along with some other resources that are part of the discussion.

Speaker:

We also link related episodes there. If you're really up for binge listening, you can also

Speaker:

check out the playlists we've got posted up to our sub stack. I want to thank T for maintaining

Speaker:

that space so well for us. Please check it out. Now let's meet Ben. Good morning, Ben. Hi,

Speaker:

Jessalyn. How's it going? It's good. I'm glad to have you back in the studio. It's been a

Speaker:

while. I had to scroll way back. So you will have to reintroduce yourself to our friends

Speaker:

here. Hi, my name is Benjamin Nolan. I'm an activist and organizer based in North Toronto.

Speaker:

I've worked with a bunch of the different orgs that have been involved in the Palestine Solidarity

Speaker:

Movement, but I'm not representing or speaking for any of them in this interview or with the

Speaker:

article that we're talking about. I will say that my kind of organizational home right now

Speaker:

is a little collective called the Mutual Aid Direct Action North Toronto Collective, Mad

Speaker:

Ant Collective. can find us on Instagram, although we're trying to really focus on in-person stuff

Speaker:

so we don't have a huge online presence but we'll post a link to that but you know you're

Speaker:

gonna have to come back in the studio with your comrades there and talk about Stitchin' Bitchin'

Speaker:

Bitchin' Stitchin' because yeah we need more mutual aid episodes like real how-to's because

Speaker:

it's amazing what people can just get up and start doing on their own but You didn't list

Speaker:

one of the reasons I brought you into the studio today. You didn't say you were a journalist

Speaker:

or a writer. I mean, you may not consider yourself as such, but you just finished writing something

Speaker:

for The Grind in their summer issue. Please support The Grind. um They do some great work

Speaker:

and Ben, now you are amongst that great work. Although it's maddening. I usually don't call

Speaker:

people in here for like really uplifting articles that they've written. Although you give us

Speaker:

some tools. It's about the Toronto police. The Toronto police chief went on a radio show

Speaker:

and Ben, you did just really a great job of not, it wasn't just a commentary on how poorly

Speaker:

he did on that show or the lies that he told, but it opens up so many em cans of worms around

Speaker:

police violence at protests, project resolutes, you know, the collusion between Toronto council,

Speaker:

police and media. whether intentional or not, it's intentional. So let's kind of unpack

Speaker:

some of that. But as you stated at the beginning, you knew the police chief was going to call

Speaker:

into talk radio shows, so you weren't going to miss it. I mean, a friend of mine who monitors

Speaker:

police socials uh noticed them shouting out that this was going to happen. I forget whether

Speaker:

it was Chief Demkew's account or whether it was like one of the other TPS. uh, like public

Speaker:

relations accounts, but they'd shouted out that this was going to happen and that people should

Speaker:

prepare their questions and call in. I mean, I'd imagine that they thought, you know, news

Speaker:

talk 10 10, you know, it's an audience that like judging from the other questions that

Speaker:

got through is mostly, you know, like kind of, think probably lower rich suburban driver types.

Speaker:

was lots of questions about like, I don't know how dastardly pedestrians are in. when you're

Speaker:

trying to turn right and they get in your way. The Nimbies love them, right? Yeah, yeah,

Speaker:

yeah. So I mean, think I think Demke thought that this is going to be a very friendly venue

Speaker:

for him to open himself up to public questions. And I think a lot of us took an independent

Speaker:

interest in, know, in seeing how this is going to play out and in trying to call in. I mean,

Speaker:

I tried to call in, I got screened out by the screener. I wondered that and I teased you

Speaker:

about it because there's a Ben quoted at the end of your article. I'm like, you didn't even

Speaker:

try. You couldn't have used it. I mean, that's not me. have not, you know, yet and thankfully

Speaker:

been subjected to the neon neck technique. But I do actually know who that is. And I mean,

Speaker:

I think that he's fine with my letting you know who it is. It's Adam Melanson, who was attacked

Speaker:

by the cops, I think, in I think it was November of 2023 at um a protest. And, you know, it's

Speaker:

funny, he told me, cause I reached out to him, you know, once I knew that I was going to be

Speaker:

writing this article to ask him about like what his experience was of getting on the air. He

Speaker:

actually had tried to call in under his real name and gave the screener his real question

Speaker:

and immediately got told to kind of take a hike politely. um So then he tried to call back

Speaker:

again, told them his name was Ben and... said that his question was going to be about how

Speaker:

TPS can hire top talent considering like the hiring initiatives in Peel region, which, you

Speaker:

know, is like obviously a question that the public is deeply concerned with and would want

Speaker:

to hear about. Yes, yes. Because it's not very often folks get to go face to face with the

Speaker:

police chief and ask some really hard questions. And you say a few of you were following it

Speaker:

personally. Why? you know, state the obvious, say the quiet part out loud. You knew what

Speaker:

he would do. I've had a bit of a front row seat to some of the big incidents of police violence

Speaker:

over the last couple of years. Um, I mean, one of the things that really kind of like motivated

Speaker:

me to get a lot more involved in the movement was I was at the Avenue 401. Uh, it was a vigil,

Speaker:

like a kind of like silent protest walk that a few folks had organized to protest. The ban

Speaker:

that the police had arbitrarily put on protesting at the Avenue 401 Overpass on the basis of

Speaker:

the false claims by Cija and other orgs that this is an exclusively Jewish neighbourhood

Speaker:

and that the protest was targeting a Jewish neighbourhood. Obviously not true. These were

Speaker:

banner drops that were modelled on similar banner drops that were done by Ukraine solidarity

Speaker:

activists, obviously to no complaints, to raise awareness about You what was happening

Speaker:

in Gaza and Canada's complicity in it. I mean, it was targeting like raising awareness for

Speaker:

drivers on the 401. They tended to happen on Saturdays. I don't know. And I mean, it's not

Speaker:

a Jewish neighborhood. It's a diverse neighborhood. It's a neighborhood that I live in. It's a

Speaker:

neighborhood who's, I mean, I the closest religious institution to the overpass is a Catholic church.

Speaker:

So I don't know. I mean, I felt. pre-activated by the police just arbitrarily declaring a

Speaker:

no protest zone in my neighbourhood. So I showed up to this and there was maybe like 20 of us

Speaker:

and we were met by, I mean, what looked like hundreds of cops. It was probably like 60 or

Speaker:

something like that. I think we shared the video of the incident in the article. Yeah. And we

Speaker:

talked about this a little bit when you were on the show with some of your comrades there

Speaker:

from the area. Yeah. Yeah. And I mean, the police basically just hyped up, attacked us, uh shoving

Speaker:

people to like icy ground, shoving people into the on-ramp lane we had been on the sidewalk

Speaker:

uh and causing a number of injuries. I think three people went to the hospital. Three people

Speaker:

were arrested on charges that were dropped because they were baseless and a huge excess of police

Speaker:

authority. so, yeah, so I, you know, I was also at the jail support rally that had happened

Speaker:

on September 11th of 2024. which as the grant reported, like essentially was a police caused

Speaker:

riot. I mean, I was like, I'd gone, I'd driven down just to drop off some water, dropped off

Speaker:

the water, went to park my car, walked back and there was tear gas everywhere. There was

Speaker:

like people being punched in the face by the cops. There was like just total mayhem. um

Speaker:

So yeah, so mean, this is why I was motivated to talk to the chief, unlike Heather Reisman.

Speaker:

who, as the breach reported, has Myron Demke on a direct line and can call whenever she

Speaker:

wants. That's not a thing anyone, think, in the regular public has access to. It's really

Speaker:

remarkable, I think, that he's been totally insulated from not only just regular movement

Speaker:

participants in the city, but movement leaders. I know that there have been lots of attempts

Speaker:

to sort of reach out and try to have a conversation about this. like the hyper policing of these

Speaker:

protests and there's just been no, like there's been no way to access these powerful people.

Speaker:

mean, even, I think I had an opportunity to ask Olivia Chow. I think we've all seen that

Speaker:

video. Yeah, like what the fuck is going on? And she basically said that the police aren't

Speaker:

her response. She doesn't have any power with police. I don't know. I don't know who they're

Speaker:

accountable to. Apparently Heather Reisman. What let's while you just describe the violence

Speaker:

you saw firsthand, plus we've seen and read about Adam's account. We will link a lot of

Speaker:

these kind of references in the show notes for folks to see for themselves. But let's quickly

Speaker:

then contrast that to the responses the chief gave of how he feels his officers have responded

Speaker:

in these matters, right? So he, you do get, or maybe you don't, but people do call in

Speaker:

and press. And what was his take? Like, what did he try to sell to 1010 Radio audience?

Speaker:

Yeah. So actually the first caller that got through, um, was someone else that I actually

Speaker:

recognized from the protest movement. Her name is Liz and she's often been involved in like

Speaker:

marshaling or being the police liaison. And she asked him about police violence. And so,

Speaker:

so she, she asked since October, 2023, it seems like the Toronto police. has been attacking

Speaker:

pro-Palestine supporters, including at least two documented instances of the controversial

Speaker:

neon neck technique. Dozens of people have ended up in the hospital as a result of police

Speaker:

force, including broken bones, concussions, torn ligaments. And I'm just wondering, is

Speaker:

the Toronto police perhaps using excessive force? So Demke's response to this was first to

Speaker:

kind of downplay police violence, talking about how there have been like hundreds of quote

Speaker:

unquote, planned and unplanned events that they've policed. And most of these have not resulted

Speaker:

in any arrests or violence. And then he went on to say that there are occasions when they've

Speaker:

had to use violence since, and of course he drops October 7th, 2023, and arrests by their

Speaker:

very nature, quote, involve some amount of use of force, unquote. But we do so, and he said,

Speaker:

proportionately to the circumstances each and every time. So that word proportionate really

Speaker:

kind of stuck out to me because I'd been talking to the Orange Hats who'd shared or been kind

Speaker:

of sharing around these numbers of injuries that they've directly documented. And I mean,

Speaker:

it should be said that this list of injuries is not, like they're not claiming that this

Speaker:

is every single case. You couldn't, like some people just go home after getting hurt and

Speaker:

they... they don't say or do anything. exactly. And so this is just the cases that they've

Speaker:

been able to sort of like confirm and document with people. over the like, basically since

Speaker:

January 2024, I mean, the highlight to me is there have been 48 brain injuries caused by

Speaker:

police violence of protesters. These have overwhelmingly I mean, the orange hats collect this data at,

Speaker:

you know, all kinds of different protests. But overwhelmingly, these cases have been at pro

Speaker:

Palestine events. Well, let's be honest, that's where most of the violence is reserved for.

Speaker:

Right. That and Indigenous-led protests. Yeah, although, I I have to say I've been at a bunch

Speaker:

of Indigenous protests over the past couple of years as well. And, you know, there have

Speaker:

been the odd comments thrown out there by the police liaison that, like, we know you guys...

Speaker:

I mean, it's bullshit, but, like, favorably contrasting... other protests to the violent,

Speaker:

hateful pro-Palestine crowd, which again is like a fabrication. I don't know, maybe this

Speaker:

is a good chance to read Liz's response to Demke's answer. Yeah. So I approached Liz because again,

Speaker:

I recognized her voice and asked her for comment on Demke's response. And she said, quote, it's

Speaker:

so hypocritical that they demand safety from the protesters when they're the ones escalating

Speaker:

actions and putting people in the hospital. I haven't seen any protesters put anyone in

Speaker:

the hospital. And the fact that they consider that a quote proportionate response says a

Speaker:

lot about the Toronto police department. Honestly, the fact that they're blaming the victims of

Speaker:

these assaults on the absolutely baseless claims of hateful actions or behavior is nonsense

Speaker:

and despicable. And I mean, I just, really want to highlight that, you know, I know that there's

Speaker:

like disagreements about strategy, but it has just been the case that there's been a strategic

Speaker:

decision on the part. of the major movement orgs in the city to pursue a strategy of nonviolence.

Speaker:

And I think the actual record of these protests has reflected that. mean, the average Habs

Speaker:

playoff win or loss, I think, has resulted in more property destruction or assault or

Speaker:

whatever than has been documented at almost two years of... hundreds of protests involving

Speaker:

tens and tens of thousands of people. We have to ask, what is this, where is this perception

Speaker:

coming from of this aura of violence that's been attached to these protests? And I mean,

Speaker:

I think the answer is like, they're racialized, there's a campaign to smear them. Liz mentions

Speaker:

it near the end. It's that framing of hate, hate crime, right? We often see attempts to

Speaker:

add hate. related charges or aggravating factors, totally unbased, right? But that has been

Speaker:

the tactic of the Zionist lobby, right? To frame just anything Palestinian as inherently

Speaker:

related to terrorism. You know, you had that, I don't remember her name, I think my mind

Speaker:

blocks out some of these clowns, but school trustee getting up there in front of everybody

Speaker:

full chest saying, you know, wearing a kaffir. is makes her feel unsafe, makes everyone

Speaker:

around them feel unsafe. it's like this. Shelly Laskin? No, she has like a hyphenated name.

Speaker:

Okay. Okay. It sounds like Shelly Laskin. Well, I was just about to say it's very invasive.

Speaker:

Like it's everywhere. Like it's like garlic mustard. But it's, um it underlies everything

Speaker:

and provides a justification. And like you, uh highlighted something for me in the article

Speaker:

that I hadn't heard uh one of the police representatives there actually calling these protests, Resolute

Speaker:

protests. Because, okay, for the audience, in case you missed our like, kajillion episodes

Speaker:

on the evolving lawfare being uh used against particularly Toronto protesters. there's Project

Speaker:

Resolute, which uh it explicitly did say, you know, It's tasked with investigating protests

Speaker:

related to the Middle East. Like they were pretty implicitly racist from the beginning, but we

Speaker:

knew that really didn't just mean the Middle East. It meant Palestine specifically. And

Speaker:

now they're just saying that out loud, right? Like I asked you, that a Freudian slip or what?

Speaker:

Like, is that just how they refer to all of these as, it's almost like a What did you

Speaker:

call it? The shorthand or like a funding code, right? Like all of this must be costing so

Speaker:

much money. Like we'll get into that. But yeah. So Project Resolute is now a web of various

Speaker:

kinds of police responses, right? From the harassment that goes on to activists after

Speaker:

to the deployment of incredible resources on site to the networking of police. across probably

Speaker:

the country at this point, but I thought that was astonishing that he got caught kind of

Speaker:

calling them. I will say I don't want to take credit for that one. I was quoting from uh

Speaker:

a piece that was run a couple of weeks ago in the New Arab by uh Aparajita Ghosh uh called

Speaker:

Drones, No-Go Zones and Weaponized Policing Inside Project Resolute Canada's Crackdown

Speaker:

on Palestine speech. So she's the one that actually reproduced that quote from the deputy

Speaker:

police chief calling these quote project resolute demonstrations and protests. uh That's deputy

Speaker:

police chief Rob Johnson. And she quotes him saying that in January. folks who don't understand,

Speaker:

like they're approaching even a vigil for slain journalists as some sort of hate crime filled

Speaker:

gathering, not just in their minds and their language, but you've seen in terms of resource

Speaker:

and heavy-handed police violence. Do you want to describe what kind of deployments you're

Speaker:

seeing at maybe even some of the more innocuous gatherings? know, there's consistently been

Speaker:

these massive police deployments to any protest marked pro-Palestine going back to essentially

Speaker:

Mayor Chao on October 9th insinuating that they're terrorists sympathizing or whatever. um It's

Speaker:

been really clear that the police understanding of what they're doing is that they're protecting

Speaker:

the public from these demonstrations that are a threat to it or something. They don't recognize

Speaker:

the demonstrations as an expression of the public or as part of the public. mean, frankly,

Speaker:

if we were to accept their line that they should be protecting, if we had it our way, they

Speaker:

would just fuck off entirely. um But uh there's been a gradual increase in the demands being

Speaker:

put on protests backed up by this threat of really immediate violence and force that,

Speaker:

again, will almost almost certainly result in charges that will later be withdrawn as

Speaker:

baseless because police are overreaching beyond any legal authority that they currently have,

Speaker:

although again, rising fascism, who knows how long until they're empowered to just beat us

Speaker:

arbitrarily. But yeah, I mean, you reference this vigil. This was a vigil that was held

Speaker:

a couple weeks ago, immediately after the murder of Anas al-Sharif and the Al Jazeera team.

Speaker:

uh in Gaza by Israel by a targeted airstrike um that was accompanied again by a smear campaign

Speaker:

trying to paint this person that had been on air live every day constantly for two years

Speaker:

as a quote fake journalist and as some kind of secret Hamas operative. Yeah, so anyway,

Speaker:

it was a vigil to not only those slain journalists, but the I think it's like approaching 300 journalists

Speaker:

that have been killed in Gaza over the last two years, which I think was recently found

Speaker:

to be more journalists than were killed in like all of the major 20th century wars combined.

Speaker:

um And so yeah, I was at this vigil which was held um outside the old Much Music building,

Speaker:

which is kind of branded with CTV, Queen and John. Yeah, et cetera. um And I was working

Speaker:

with the Marshall team and uh like before the protest or the vigil, wasn't even a it was

Speaker:

a vigil. Before the vigil had been assembled. Police liaison, uh, Nerubin, backed by Roger

Speaker:

Ford, approached us and basically said, you're not going to be allowed to march in the streets

Speaker:

unless you tell us your route. I mean, of course it wasn't planned to be a march. So we were

Speaker:

like, what are you talking about? Yeah, it's illegal for you guys to march and you get to

Speaker:

do it at our pleasure. Blah, blah, blah, blah. I think we were like, listen, this is a vigil.

Speaker:

We don't want this to be about confrontation with the cops. He said specifically, we have

Speaker:

enough deployments to arrest everyone. So like the police response to the public wanting

Speaker:

to have a vigil to journalists being murdered by an apartheid state was again, violent threats.

Speaker:

And so he then approached me again as the crowd built up to the point that it started

Speaker:

to spill into the street. And kind of I asked him to clarify it. Like he reiterated this

Speaker:

threat and asked him to clarify it. Like what is the legal basis? that you're claiming for

Speaker:

this. And he cited the fact that all streets downtown are critical infrastructure. And he

Speaker:

cited the Highway Traffic Act and said explicitly that basically protests are only allowed to

Speaker:

take the street at police discretion under the Highway Traffic Act. So I did some research

Speaker:

and I think it's like section 141 that empowers police to direct traffic. which I guess they're

Speaker:

interpreting is like crowning them absolute dictators of all streets everywhere. doesn't

Speaker:

take much for them to get that green light though, right? Like any kind of encouragement. G20

Speaker:

did a lot for them there. And I mean, and the Highway Traffic Act is not part of the criminal

Speaker:

code. Like it's like Ontario legislation. And so essentially where that they think that that

Speaker:

empowers them to criminalize people is Essentially, if you violate their directives, they can arrest

Speaker:

you or charge you with obstruction. Or mischief is a common charge for folks for blocking the

Speaker:

roadway. Yeah. And like you said, these charges end up getting dropped down the road. like

Speaker:

just quickly, we should note that even though charges are dropped, people go through incredible

Speaker:

trauma. You know, that isn't to scare folks from protesting because there's support systems.

Speaker:

I mean, like you're doxxed with these police statements. You You know, have to face repercussions,

Speaker:

your family, your job may find out that you've been arrested and then they add that stupid

Speaker:

tagline and investigated for possible hate crimes, you know, just because you've been tagged with

Speaker:

the resolute tag, right? And that's an automatic basically hate crime investigation. And then

Speaker:

you have to possibly spend a few days in jail, fight bail conditions or live under awful

Speaker:

bail conditions. We've told so many stories of people spending months and months or longer.

Speaker:

with ridiculous bail conditions that are unconstitutional. So we've done so many episodes. That's just

Speaker:

why I kind of gave the fast version there, because it's that process of punishment that they

Speaker:

use. when they threaten Ben going, we have enough people to arrest you, it's not like

Speaker:

they're just going to arrest you and ticket you for trust or jaywalking or whatever they

Speaker:

think you're doing. They will charge you under the criminal code unjustly, because it's no

Speaker:

sweat off their back at all. They move on. their arrest record and conviction record is

Speaker:

not a concern for them whatsoever, right? They will just move on to the next project, Resolute

Speaker:

Protest, and round them up. And I think watching London round up 500 plus people in one day

Speaker:

is setting a tone as well, because you get to a certain amount of numbers and you think,

Speaker:

they can't arrest us all. And then they're showing up on site saying, we absolutely fucking

Speaker:

can, and we will. Did you record that? confession from that cop or that cop telling you that

Speaker:

he is the law. Yeah, yeah. So I did record his clarification, which I think was really

Speaker:

helpful because I interpreted that. So this happened on the Tuesday ahead of last Saturday's

Speaker:

kind of big march that was meeting at Yonge and Dundas Square. I kind of interpreted this

Speaker:

as essentially a shot off the bow, trying to intimidate organizers ahead of that march.

Speaker:

And so we were like really wanting to try to figure out how we could push back against this

Speaker:

and, you know, get it clarified, get it on the public record that there's no legal basis for

Speaker:

this thing. So, you know, we showed the recording to Shane Martinez, who's a criminal law lawyer

Speaker:

here in Toronto, who's defended a lot of people in the movement to folks at the criminal community

Speaker:

justice collective, you know, and they were all basically unanimous in saying, There is

Speaker:

no legal basis for this claim. That doesn't mean that they're not gonna arrest you, possibly

Speaker:

violently, possibly sticking you with these onerous bail conditions, sticking you in like

Speaker:

a cold room overnight. This must be so frustrating for lawyers, right? Like trying to advise the

Speaker:

movement because everything comes with, yeah, but like in the past they wouldn't have, but

Speaker:

now we don't know or by law they can't, but that means doesn't mean they won't. And they

Speaker:

brag about... the arrest numbers. like to them, I remember on the anniversary of October 7th,

Speaker:

October 7th, 2024, think Demeque issued this long statement, you know, which was directed

Speaker:

towards the small minority in Toronto that are aggressively pro-Israel, reassuring them that

Speaker:

like, look, look how much we're protecting you. Look how many people we are violently arresting.

Speaker:

So to them, the arrest numbers are themselves a thing that they can kind of make bank off

Speaker:

of. And it doesn't matter that the arrests later get thrown out as baseless. You know, it doesn't

Speaker:

matter that people's reputations get ruined, not only because of just the press releases

Speaker:

that get like stenographically reproduced by CP24, City News, et cetera, with no follow-up,

Speaker:

no investigation. Which, know, again, it's not like necessarily the journalists themselves

Speaker:

fault. They're under these like crazy strict deadlines. They don't have time to do actual

Speaker:

reporting. But I mean, maybe we need to recognize that this news is coming from people that don't

Speaker:

have time to do actual reporting. And, you know, that should be an asterisk next to absolutely

Speaker:

everything that appears in these, on these websites, you know, and then these get picked up by

Speaker:

activists, like pro genocide activists that see any expression of dissent against Israel's

Speaker:

genocide against Canada's support for Israel's genocide as something that is convictable

Speaker:

immediately. And they launched these campaigns to like disparage and um get people fired and

Speaker:

get people harassed. And I mean, I believe that the police know this and this is why I

Speaker:

know that at the Legal Support Committee, they have like the process of the punishment as

Speaker:

a bit of a mantra. You know, basically the presumption of innocence doesn't exist, you

Speaker:

know? I just want to interject for a second because you said something about pro-Israeli

Speaker:

activists picking up on these releases. I would suggest they are fed to them. Because we know,

Speaker:

like, we've had an episode on Project Resolute itself and the people that are actually running

Speaker:

it. within the Ontario Attorney General's office. And we know that there's been cases where they

Speaker:

have had contacts inside the Israeli embassy well before anybody else could. And so I

Speaker:

would suggest there is a pipeline of charges to those that would dox HonestReporting.com

Speaker:

or whatever it is. they, this is not just someone like waiting for police feeds and getting lucky

Speaker:

and finding things. I'm imagining. It's fed to them and just to double back again on them

Speaker:

bragging about their arrests, that's not just for the folks that you mentioned. It's the

Speaker:

only way to justify the means to the next one, right? And their budget, right? You can't just

Speaker:

keep deploying hundreds of officers and then go back and have no arrests, right? Because

Speaker:

over and over, it's one thing to be like, oh, you we were ultra cautious. And then look,

Speaker:

we had to arrest 12 people. So let's be extra. cautious, extra deployed. Next time, let's

Speaker:

get more bells and whistles, new training, more drones, you know, all of it. just it snowballs,

Speaker:

right? Because every time they manifest these arrests, it just justifies even more spending,

Speaker:

which is more police violence, which is even more arrests. And because they won't ever

Speaker:

be satisfied with with their budget or their growth, right? So it's just a feeding frenzy.

Speaker:

Well, and then it becomes it becomes a resource sink for the movement to fight all of these

Speaker:

all of these kind of petty things that again, I mean, it's it's it's like kind of effective

Speaker:

counterinsurgency being pushed by again, these activists supporting the genocide that's being

Speaker:

committed with Canadian complicity in Gaza. You know, suddenly we're like only we're talking

Speaker:

about and we're focused on like getting these unjust charges thrown out. The story is about

Speaker:

this police response or whether or not the police are responding to us. You know, poses external

Speaker:

threat well enough, you know, whatever, when it's people that are out there protesting the

Speaker:

genocide that's being committed in our name. And like, again, any excuse to sort of bury

Speaker:

that headline is something that I think the police are deeply complicit in participating

Speaker:

in, you know, suppressing. I can see why you were so eager to tune in and fact check this

Speaker:

shit. It's astonishing that the mainstream media isn't. We did mention this with another guest

Speaker:

where it's just how many times have they been provided evidence, like Adam's case is probably

Speaker:

one of the best ones, where multiple outlets were there to witness his beating and then

Speaker:

arrest. And actually... published something along the lines of, actually, you know, according

Speaker:

to a global, you know, global news cameraman on site, but that often does not happen. Like

Speaker:

they just happen to get lucky and they were there. They do not seek out the other story.

Speaker:

So we brought in a gur from the movement media hub, right? And he talks about using similar

Speaker:

tactics as the police. Like he didn't say they were similar, but I'm drawing the similarities

Speaker:

where like you were just feeding the press what they need, your own your own police report,

Speaker:

you know, it's not a mugshot and whatnot, but it's everything, all the counterpoints that

Speaker:

any journalist might need to tell at least half of that other side of the story. And still

Speaker:

it's hard to get traction that way. You know what I mean? So there's this inherent bias,

Speaker:

even when it's made easy for the journalists. So, so to pick up on the story following up

Speaker:

from the vigil, I had that recording and we saw this again as a shot off the bow warning

Speaker:

us essentially that they're going to be even more. draconian uh on Saturday at the big march.

Speaker:

uh You know, recently they've taken to demanding protest routes uh and saying and enforcing

Speaker:

this completely bullshit rule that if the protest stops for like a speaker or something like

Speaker:

that, if it stops for more than five minutes, that's against the law or something like

Speaker:

that. This is the line that's being enforced, especially by Roger Ford, as I've seen, but

Speaker:

I mean, I know it's also been the case with some others. And so we wanted to kind of like

Speaker:

do some pushback on that. And so we gave the recording to some reporters at the Star who

Speaker:

said they were kind of interested in running a story on this policy change on the part of

Speaker:

the cops. A couple of us had been prepared to like give interviews to them. They said

Speaker:

they wanted to reach out to the cops first and get their statement. Of course. Yeah. And the

Speaker:

police denied that there's been any policy change. And also said of of Nourubin, the police liaison

Speaker:

that I recorded, that he, I forget exactly what the word was. think that he had misstated or

Speaker:

misled us about the law. Well, Nourubin can't show up as police liaison to any resolute protest

Speaker:

now, can he? Yeah. If you face him, you're going like, you have no credibility son. Like you

Speaker:

have none. Your boys in blue won't even back you. Yeah. mean, again, as- As some of the

Speaker:

lawyers I talked to said, mean, police talk, police don't know the law and they don't care

Speaker:

to know the law because it's not their business to know the law. They have this power to do

Speaker:

these arrests on the basis of whatever they decide the law is. And then it's for the courts

Speaker:

to figure it out later at the public's expense. I mean, this is not cheap. It's not cheap to

Speaker:

like, you know, baselessly put like place charges on. At this point, I 133 or more uh protest

Speaker:

participants that are overwhelmingly either going to be thrown out or result in discharges,

Speaker:

which is to say not convictions, which is again the other, I think, major piece of news that

Speaker:

got kind of broken in this, which is that like so far these arrests haven't resulted in any

Speaker:

convictions at all. Now, I mean, I don't. I don't expect that to hold up forever. they're

Speaker:

gonna, the court system is extremely hostile to Palestine solidarity. They're part of the

Speaker:

Canadian state that is supporting this genocide. And so, I mean, I think eventually they're

Speaker:

gonna come up with some conviction and then at that point it'll be like one out of 133,

Speaker:

right? Oh, and they will blow that one case up when they can, right? Like it's, I keep

Speaker:

thinking back to, London and you know I was just reading some discourse around those arrests

Speaker:

like 500 or more at one action is just like fucking astonishing but you hear a lot of people

Speaker:

talking about oh you police are just following orders you know you're talking about folks

Speaker:

you've got the Nuremberg defense yeah yeah like I don't know if they hear it when they say

Speaker:

it out loud but it was genuine pushback against like vilifying actual police officers. So like

Speaker:

the folks you're naming here are decision makers, Deputy police chiefs, police liaisons and

Speaker:

whatnot. But a lot of some of the tactics that folks have employed in LA is another example,

Speaker:

but in the UK as well is documenting each and every police officer at these actions in an

Speaker:

attempt to shame them, hold them accountable, document it. I mean, there's probably a multitude

Speaker:

of reasons why people are doing it. How are you feeling about, you know, pushing back against

Speaker:

police? I mean, I think it's, you know, by whatever means that we can do, I think we need

Speaker:

to sort of figure out how to, um, like call out and push back against this overreach. mean,

Speaker:

to the extent that Canada wants to pretend that it's democracy, like this is completely inconsistent

Speaker:

with that. I think that like the key thing right now is just to understand like the processes.

Speaker:

by which the decisions about these things are getting made. I mean, I don't know. mean,

Speaker:

TPS denied to the star that there's been a policy change, although we did still see an expression

Speaker:

of an apparent policy change at the level of the street on Saturday, where they did enforce

Speaker:

the demand for the route, where they did enforce this bullshit five minute restriction and where

Speaker:

they had an absolutely massive deployment, including of course, their like horses. that they had

Speaker:

used to trample all over protesters at the land day march in March of 2024. And which actually,

Speaker:

you it's funny on the radio call in show, I don't think this made it into the article,

Speaker:

but there was a question about, actually there were two questions that were led through about

Speaker:

public drug use. You know, and obviously like the end to the safe injection sites program

Speaker:

was never talked about by either Carol or by... Demp Q, no, m but Carol did mention that they

Speaker:

had tried trampling over the encampments with horses and funnily enough that didn't work.

Speaker:

So actually, I think you can find a recording of the whole episode linked to from the article

Speaker:

if you want to hear that snippet. I mean, I think the whole thing is worth listening to.

Speaker:

It is as long as you have something there to help center you, because I imagine it's quite

Speaker:

maddening to hear these two, you know, even the photo that you've used there where they're

Speaker:

hugging one another. And it's just you mentioned her and I forgot to I have Fuck Shelly Carroll

Speaker:

in my notes here. So um the complicit in the cooperation that Toronto Council is giving

Speaker:

all of this, most namely in the form of a bubble zone law, like whether or not that applies

Speaker:

to any of the confrontations that you're kind of talking about or not, it's just like this

Speaker:

other another tool that's been given to the police, almost very specifically to counter

Speaker:

pro-Palestinian protests and embolden them. right, to give them even more ability to

Speaker:

cordon off areas, no-go zones, and restrict the movement of protesters. Have you kind

Speaker:

of felt the impacts of that? I mean, when it came, we talked to the Orange Hats, and they

Speaker:

were great in saying, know, giving us plenty of examples of they already create bubble zones.

Speaker:

You talked about one on the overpass. When they want to make one, they'll make one. But now

Speaker:

it's, you know, there's a hundred thousand dollar possible fine. And then, you know, Carney's

Speaker:

talking about adding it to the criminal code. But are you finding cops emboldened by that

Speaker:

or utilizing it all? mean, I haven't heard them specifically invoke it yet. I'd imagine

Speaker:

that would change if it does get added to the criminal code because suddenly then it becomes

Speaker:

their problem in a big way. I mean, I think that the TPS response to the legislation, which

Speaker:

by the way, like their own legal counsel said was not constitutional, which their public

Speaker:

consent manufacturing exercise. 97%. Yeah, everyone said they don't want this. But I mean, TPS's

Speaker:

response was we already basically do this. So this isn't going to change anything. And I

Speaker:

mean, again, like the key kind of reference incident for this. Was a fucking fiction.

Speaker:

was the, there was that hands off Rafa march in February of 2024, which went from the Israeli

Speaker:

consulate to the US consulate, which is on lower university. Hospital row. Yeah. So essentially

Speaker:

the march, I think went along college. And then if I remember right, the police actually directed

Speaker:

the march down the university. Yes, they did. And then there was this guy named Spider-Man

Speaker:

for Palestine that had been climbing lampposts and like- That's not his real name. You know,

Speaker:

whatever. Yeah, yeah. He'd been like climbing, you know, climbing buildings and waving the-

Speaker:

Scaffolding, usually. All the way down the protest route. Of course, there was one short, I think,

Speaker:

17-second clip of him climbing on Mount Sinai for a photo op for one second. The protest

Speaker:

did not stop, but this got picked up on by like- Weinstein by then Cija and all these other

Speaker:

orgs to claim that the protest had, quote, targeted Mount Sinai Hospital, a line that

Speaker:

was then validated by the entire political establishment, including fucking Jagmeet Singh, who, incidentally,

Speaker:

I bumped into shortly before the election in Kensington Market. He was just driving his

Speaker:

bike or whatever. And I asked him, like, why didn't you retract this once it became clear

Speaker:

this was a lie? And he said that he just like laughed it off and said, I don't, I don't remember.

Speaker:

You know, lots of things have happened. It's not significant to him. It's not significant

Speaker:

to him. And yet this is this key reference point. This entire, this fiction for painting the

Speaker:

protests as a violent and as targeting quote, a historically Jewish hospital that is a public

Speaker:

hospital. that like most of us are patients at in one form or another. feel like I think

Speaker:

my like I have a specialist that's at Mount Sinai. I like use my, why would we target a

Speaker:

hospital? know? The shit people got away with, we didn't plan on talking about this, but

Speaker:

there's no way. I think it was Lisa MacLeod and I might be wrong. Oh, who said that they'd

Speaker:

infiltrated? Yes, that they were like attacking Jewish doctors and patients inside the hospital.

Speaker:

That entrance was closed. It had been closed for hours. Yeah. Yeah. Oh, no, we go off

Speaker:

on that on this show here because just for the reason you say it was for so many, it's a

Speaker:

moment that's referenced by our enemies many times, and it just kind of helps set policy,

Speaker:

even though they would have grabbed onto anything. But it also for me, it was like the ridiculousness

Speaker:

of ever trying to manage the narrative by adjusting your parade route. Sorry. Your march. route

Speaker:

or, uh you know, worrying about how this might be perceived by the press ahead of time when

Speaker:

you can do something just so simple as, you know, dress in a costume and climb on something

Speaker:

and that changes the trajectory in a way. But yeah, it was like, it doesn't matter what

Speaker:

you do, they will come up with a story and twist it and it will be used to feed that narrative

Speaker:

that anything Palestinian is inherently violent, like just so explicitly racist. Yeah. And I

Speaker:

mean, it wasn't like the the sort of escalation of police, like police efforts to dominate

Speaker:

the protests had started before this. So you know that they were like waiting on an opportunity

Speaker:

and they validated every bullshit narrative about this, even though they were on scene,

Speaker:

they know exactly what had happened. But They'd already kind of signaled that their priority

Speaker:

was to crack down on the protest. think in January of 2024 was when they started to like really

Speaker:

try to police uh the truck, you know, the truck that usually leads the protest with the speaker.

Speaker:

like they started to demand that the driver give their driver's license. They started to

Speaker:

like, it decided that they needed to get to do a full check that all the speakers were

Speaker:

locked down that. No one was riding in the bed of the truck uh while it was moving at

Speaker:

five kilometers per hour, threatening that they would arrest you for like, I think stunt driving,

Speaker:

which is again an arrest that they then made on like one month later. Impounded. Impounding

Speaker:

the trunk for fucking stunt driving for just like going with five kilometers per hour up

Speaker:

the street. Obviously this legislation was intended to empower police to like uh stop. like illegal

Speaker:

drag racing like Fast and the Furious style. It has no relevance to this and yet this

Speaker:

is again the pretext that they're using on the ground to justify using these like excessive

Speaker:

measures to try to intimidate and put costs on people before there's any kind of actual

Speaker:

judicial evaluation of whether that's legitimate. And there's apparently no feedback mechanism

Speaker:

because when the courts tell them that it's not, it doesn't change their behavior. And

Speaker:

that's not a scandal because we don't have an independent press except for like these tiny

Speaker:

exceptions like the grind, the breach, know, the maple, Samira Moyadid, you know, there's

Speaker:

these tiny exceptions that don't have like huge audiences. They're pretty effectively restricted

Speaker:

in their reach by social media, et cetera. um But like, again, like the journalists are not

Speaker:

pressing back on this and there's no will on the part of these major media outlets to be

Speaker:

aggressive with this stuff. And again, the burden of proof that we're dealing with to register

Speaker:

anything in those venues is like as high as Everest. Whereas if you're a pro-Israel genocide

Speaker:

fear monger, you literally don't have to, you can make shit up and it gets run, you know?

Speaker:

Or corrected. Yeah. What was the latest maddening? I believe it was the Globe and Mail made a

Speaker:

correction labeling Gaza's starvation. was forced starvation. They corrected that it was that

Speaker:

that was an overstatement or something like that. I think I saw that on the show yesterday.

Speaker:

Yeah, through that pressure that you're talking about, you know, and that we've talked about

Speaker:

too on the show. So when they want to influence the story in the same way, you know, we bombard

Speaker:

MPs and MPPs with phone calls and emails and some facts. They're at these newsrooms, right?

Speaker:

Going, you didn't print it the way that we wanted to be printed, here's the correction, or ahead

Speaker:

of time, you know? I mean, if they were only bombarding the newsrooms, I don't think that

Speaker:

it would have the impact that it obviously has, because we're also, to some extent, bombarding

Speaker:

the newsrooms. That's right, that inherent bias is there already. Yeah, we're not, like, we're

Speaker:

not, like, when we call bullshit on some- And when we organize people to call or message

Speaker:

or email, it doesn't have the same effect. So I mean, at the end of the day, it's it's there's

Speaker:

a lot of shit happening behind the scenes in terms of the power elite in this country that

Speaker:

is like pretty, you know, it just renders ludicrous the idea that Canada is a fucking

Speaker:

democracy. It's not a democracy. know, oh, you drop that bomb at the end of the episode. I

Speaker:

don't know. I'm just angry that there's like, you know, we just had an election and there's

Speaker:

no. viable electoral option that has a serious proposal. I'm feeling every word. Yeah, that

Speaker:

has a serious proposal to address the biggest, like, housing environment stuff, like climate

Speaker:

changes, like, who can you vote for that will, like... I don't care. I don't really care anymore

Speaker:

because that's not the most effective way, but it just for people listening at the beginning

Speaker:

of the show, you know, there's a chant like, is what democracy looks like. Most of the time

Speaker:

that is, like, facetious. You know, like I am sometimes demonstrating the worst of democracy,

Speaker:

but also, you know, us in the streets, I think is better example of what democracy, you know,

Speaker:

could and should look like. uh Mob rule is something that, you know, people have such fear of. But

Speaker:

of course, when you when you frame it that way. have fear of the fact that that Heather

Speaker:

Reisman, who literally redirects Canadian tax credits to directly support the Israeli military

Speaker:

currently committing genocide has a direct line to, you know, the police, the chief of police,

Speaker:

whenever she wants. And we have to ambush him on a call in show because no matter what

Speaker:

we try, we can't get through. can't register as like people that are valid members of

Speaker:

the Canadian public, you know. uh And this again has been a strategy, like there's been an aggressive

Speaker:

strategy on the part of the pro-Israel lobby too. You know, at their rallies, they'll always

Speaker:

be waving the Israeli flag and the Canadian flag. And then they'll, you know, call for

Speaker:

the deportation, you know, of anyone involved in Palestine protest, implying that we're all

Speaker:

foreign agitators. I mean, I'm, I'm Métis, I'm not foreign to this. I mean, like, technically

Speaker:

this, like, whatever my homeland is the Red River or whatever, it's not true. So in that

Speaker:

sense, I guess I'm foreign in Toronto, fine, deport me to Winnipeg. But like, but there,

Speaker:

you know, if you look again at these pro-Israel protests that happened, they're overwhelmingly

Speaker:

white. And there is an aggressive attempt to racialize and play on the racism of Canadian

Speaker:

society to rationalize, again, criminalizing and using violence against these protests

Speaker:

that again have been overwhelmingly peaceful, you for better or worse. Which is why those

Speaker:

lines sell so easily, right? In the ridiculousness of the Spider-Man and the Mount Sinai, or just

Speaker:

the simple descriptions of these protests as hateful and disrupt- well, I would love for

Speaker:

them to be disruptive, but that has connotations for most, you know, Canadians. And so it's

Speaker:

quite easy for them to then look at these two sides and kind of be maybe unsure. or they're

Speaker:

buying it hook, line and sinker, right? They may believe in the Palestinian cause, but that

Speaker:

doesn't mean they're not still looking at the resistance movement here as inherently violent

Speaker:

because of what the media is telling them, right? What the police is telling them. And

Speaker:

that makes them perhaps reluctant to lean into the movement in the way that they could. So

Speaker:

yeah, it has detrimental impact even when people know, you know, right from wrong, maybe globally.

Speaker:

And I know we're moving people on Zionism as being untenable, as unsustainable, as wrong.

Speaker:

But how we feel about protests is still not very good, right? Like people hated the convoy

Speaker:

for obvious reasons. And then now folks are looking at other forms of protest as just too

Speaker:

disruptive. know, even a strike, Air Canada workers, you know, not everybody was with them

Speaker:

because it was going to disrupt our economy. uh So I think there's a little bit of work

Speaker:

to be done, you know, to counter that. And I'm glad that you're doing that kind of work to

Speaker:

call them on this bullshit and reframe it. Have you had a response, any notable response from

Speaker:

the article? Like, police chief call you? Yeah, I mean, not too much. Like, I know that it's

Speaker:

been generally well received in kind of activist circles. I mean, to me, the most important

Speaker:

thing was to just provide a venue to register some of these facts. that then can be uh referenced

Speaker:

by others because, know, like that just despite the efforts of groups like the Orange Hats

Speaker:

or groups like the Legal Support Committee to get these things registered in the media, it

Speaker:

just hasn't, they've been met with stonewalls. that's what's been important. And so I'm hoping

Speaker:

that it has a positive impact kind of in the longer term. I mean, just like The Grind,

Speaker:

I think published that account of what actually happened at Mount Sinai Hospital. that to me

Speaker:

has been really valuable to like reference in the future, like to reference on an ongoing

Speaker:

basis to blow up this myth that keeps being brought up to justify these crackdowns. I'm

Speaker:

hoping that this can be helpful for that in the future. It already has been. So thank you.

Speaker:

I will link it in the show notes for folks to read it in full. But again, yeah, please support

Speaker:

folks like The Grind and The Maple. They are really going above and beyond in these times

Speaker:

to kind of get the truth out there. Everyone's doing every little bit that they can on every

Speaker:

imaginable front. Ben, you're one of those people. appreciate the tidbits of wisdom. You drop

Speaker:

me a line every now and again and I get a scoop or whatnot. And I do appreciate you keeping

Speaker:

in touch with the show and keeping us updated as well. Thank you. Thanks, Jessa. I mean,

Speaker:

I really think that you're doing the Lord's work. I, I, I, these stories, again, I wish

Speaker:

not even just for like audience growth sake. mean, like they're just, everyone should hear

Speaker:

them. Cause like sometimes my measure is telling my mom and getting her reaction. And I imagine

Speaker:

that would be most, um, mainstream Canadians actions. Like what? No, they didn't, you know,

Speaker:

like that, they can't do that. And you know, I. If I could just generate that feeling

Speaker:

in as many people as possible paired with the what can I do about it? And then, uh yes, I

Speaker:

will feel like we're being productive. um But yeah, I can't do it without the guests. So

Speaker:

thanks again. And until next time. Cheers, Jessa. That is a wrap on another episode of

Speaker:

Blueprints of Disruption. Thank you for joining us. Blueprints of Disruption is an independent

Speaker:

production operated cooperatively. You can follow us on Twitter at BPofDisruption. If you'd like

Speaker:

to help us continue disrupting the status quo, please share our content. And if you have the

Speaker:

means, consider becoming a patron. Not only does our support come from the progressive

Speaker:

community, so does our content. So reach out to us and let us know what or who we should

Speaker:

be amplifying. So until next time, keep disrupting.