Greetings friends. My name is Jess McLean and I'm here to provide you with some blueprints
Speaker:of disruption. This weekly podcast is dedicated to amplifying the work of activists, examining
Speaker:power structures and sharing the success stories from the grassroots. Through these discussions,
Speaker:we hope to provide folks with the tools and the inspiration they need to start to dismantle
Speaker:capitalism, decolonize our spaces and bring about the political revolution that we know
Speaker:we need. Palestinian workers have issued calls for solidarity, specifically to their fellow
Speaker:workers inside the imperialist core. That is most of us. They are asking work be done to
Speaker:enlist the labor movement in ending not just the current siege on Gaza, but the occupation
Speaker:of Palestine. These next two guests are answering some of those key demands, which are, at their
Speaker:core, economic disruptions aimed to isolate Israel politically. and cut off their well-funded
Speaker:supply of arms. We talked about the blockade of Incas in Toronto on our episode, Shutting
Speaker:It Down for Palestine. It was an action organised by a coalition of workers from different organisations
Speaker:who stood side by side outside the facility where technology, used in Israeli aggression,
Speaker:is made. We will hear what that was like first hand and how they got there in terms of strategy.
Speaker:But we'll also hear the ideology behind an internationalist struggle. for human emancipation, one that
Speaker:focuses on disarming the imperialist powers rather than negotiate with them. Once we get
Speaker:there and agree that an escalation of tactics is needed, the question becomes how to generate
Speaker:the critical mass needed to really disrupt that system, to stop the bombs on Gaza and liberate
Speaker:Palestine for our own liberation. A key component is clearly organized labor. Globally, workers
Speaker:are taking a stand and refusing to transport Israeli weapons or refusing to offload them
Speaker:at major ports. Just as I record this intro, activists in Vancouver are occupying the offices
Speaker:of Zim, Israel's largest shipping line that supplies weapons to the IOF. This is part of
Speaker:the larger block the boat and stop arming Israel actions taking place all across the world.
Speaker:This week also saw activists in Oakland cling to the side of a ship. loaded with weapons
Speaker:destined for Israel, a boat that had been used to do the same in the Iraq and Afghanistan
Speaker:wars. They prevented it from leaving for nine hours. As the boat left, they chanted, we will
Speaker:see you at the next stop, implying comrades across the water will help stop, or at least
Speaker:slow, the flow of arms to be used against the Palestinian people. And that's exactly what
Speaker:has been happening. That same boat was stalled up the coast in Tacoma, Washington. where canoes
Speaker:used by Coast Salish territory activists were blocking the boat from leaving the port. Workers
Speaker:in Barcelona have refused to load shipments bound for Israel. Australian activists have
Speaker:done the same and are planning more for November 11th. This is indeed a global movement. Canadian
Speaker:workers also have a role to play here too. So we get into that and just how we get them to
Speaker:come along in such a critical moment in the struggle. against imperialism. So let's get
Speaker:started. Welcome to the show. Can you introduce yourself please? Hi, I'm Martin. I work as
Speaker:a caretaker. I'm a rank and file member of Toronto education workers, QP local 4400. And I'm part
Speaker:of the Communist Workers Circle, communist study group that focuses on blue collar unionized
Speaker:workers. Hi, my name is Kay. I'm a member of Canada, Philippines solidarity organization,
Speaker:CPSO. CPSO is a group of non-Filipinos, primarily, who organize in solidarity with the National
Speaker:Democratic Revolution in the Philippines, against the semi-colonial and semi-feudal control of
Speaker:the Philippines by imperialist countries, primarily the United States, but also Canada, Japan,
Speaker:and China as well. And as you know, the United States happens to be also the biggest supporter
Speaker:of the Zionist entity. known as Israel. So there's certainly a shared struggle between the Filipino
Speaker:people and Palestinian people. I'm also a campaign co-chair of the International League of People's
Speaker:Struggle, ILPS Canada, an alliance of anti-imperialist organizations which CPSO is a member of. I
Speaker:attended INCA's action as a representative of ILPS. Its objectives align with our ongoing
Speaker:anti-militarization campaign. and our support for the rights of Palestinians, including their
Speaker:right to resist the occupation by any means necessary. Definitely want to ask you about
Speaker:efforts for revolution in the Philippines. But you brought up the Incas protests, so let's
Speaker:actually start there because when I cast out a net, you folks came in, I needed to talk
Speaker:to people who had escalated the actions in terms of ending the siege on Gaza. We've seen mass
Speaker:actions, we've seen sit-ins. We've seen all kinds, but a blockade in front of a weapons
Speaker:manufacturer here in Toronto, for me, kind of signaled an escalation, a much needed escalation.
Speaker:And we'd seen similar actions, a lot of them in the United Kingdom. And there were some
Speaker:really telling images that came from those that I found inspiring. And I think it answers the
Speaker:call, both for the Palestinian resistance to stop the bombs. We can plead with our politicians,
Speaker:but in the end they want the bombs to stop falling on them. I think folks can understand why that
Speaker:particular manufacturer was targeted. But when you say that Action K fit with the ILPS' mandate,
Speaker:do you want to get into that a little bit more in terms of what led you to that particular
Speaker:blockade that day? Yeah, so this action was in response to a call from Palestinian workers,
Speaker:which is a coalition of Palestinian trade unions and community organizations. In their statement,
Speaker:they say, Palestinian trade unions call on our counterparts internationally and all people
Speaker:of conscience to end all forms of complicity with Israel's crimes. Most urgently, halting
Speaker:the arms trade with Israel. as well as all funding and military research. It goes on to list the
Speaker:demands of these five of them. One is to refuse to build weapons destined for Israel. And second
Speaker:is to refuse to transport weapons to Israel. And third is to pass motions in their trade
Speaker:unions to this effect. And four, to take action against complicit companies involved in implementing
Speaker:Israel's brutal and illegal siege, especially if they have contracts with your institution.
Speaker:Five. pressure governments to stop all military trade with Israel, and in the case of the US,
Speaker:funding to it. So I think what's really important in this list of demands is that we have these
Speaker:institutions in Canada that are either directly responsible or complicit in the enabling of
Speaker:the genocide in Palestine. We operate under the understanding that Zionism is a product
Speaker:of imperialism. Like I said previously, it's... The United States is the biggest supporter
Speaker:of so-called Israel, but Canada is deeply complicit in it, to say the least. Canada is an imperious
Speaker:country, as Lenin defined it. I'm not going to list them all, the qualifications of what
Speaker:an imperious country is, but you know, yeah. Yeah, export of capital, right, as opposed
Speaker:to commodities. Importantly, the dividing up of the world. It's a contest for hegemony and
Speaker:domination. know, some of the biggest capitalist state. No, we've made that case here on the
Speaker:show and I think the audience would mostly agree with you. I mean, we use colonial tactics at
Speaker:home and abroad. Because I think like there's a lot of people that we're encountering in
Speaker:discussions that don't really, they don't fully understand Canada's complicity. I think because
Speaker:they can't understand its motivation. But it's because we don't have a real understanding
Speaker:of our, the level of arms manufacturing that we do here, or the extent that the Canadian
Speaker:government will act on behalf of capital, right? Everyone's always looking for like the Canadian
Speaker:reason, like why would Canada back Israel? Like what is the tie there? And why would they do
Speaker:what we say that they're doing in South America? And it's to facilitate mining, to increase
Speaker:our arms trade, right? We already, what was it, 2022, $21 million from the Canadian. arms
Speaker:manufacturers, you know, exported to Israel. I just want to add another number to backup
Speaker:what Kay is saying when he says that the US is a huge supporter of Israel and their military.
Speaker:They call it defense spending, but we won't call it that here. We know better. 55% of US
Speaker:foreign military aid, 55% of all the money that they throw out to armed groups everywhere,
Speaker:55% of it goes to Israel. I thought that was astonishing. And so when folks ask like, what
Speaker:role can the West play? Like, what are all these protests doing? What would a Canadian politician
Speaker:even do? Like, they just can't remove themselves that easily. You know, they're intrinsically
Speaker:tied. So I appreciate Kay making that point. Yeah, I think like our neighbors, I had my
Speaker:neighbor just, I come out and he's like, what are we gonna do? What's Canada's role in this?
Speaker:And I went off, but I felt like there's probably a lot of them out there that just think this
Speaker:is none of our business, you know, but. It's big business here. I'm going to just hop to
Speaker:Martin. The Incas protest was a solidarity action, right? It was a bit of an alliance because
Speaker:I know that the labor for Palestine was also there. Labor against the arms trade was there.
Speaker:It was a real collection of folks. That's kind of unusual. I think for such a subversive action,
Speaker:right? It's easy to get everyone to come out to a rally, but it's hard to convince people
Speaker:to put their name on. something more disruptive than that, something that might get bad press,
Speaker:might end up in arrests. That's a jump that not everybody's willing to make yet. But what
Speaker:was it like for your folks getting involved with this and the reasons behind it? Yeah,
Speaker:thank you. The big three groups organizing this, so far as I could tell, were Labor for Palestine,
Speaker:Labor Against the Art of Interest Trade, and World Beyond War. The way this was organized
Speaker:was very like point to point, people who had other people's signal, contact, and who you
Speaker:knew from actions, getting into touch with each other and seeing who it is we could get out.
Speaker:Part of I think what made this coalition, what made all these groups come together is the
Speaker:fact that it was very much the. right up of the action, what it is you were told is like,
Speaker:you're showing up here. I wasn't told I was told about a week out. I wasn't told it was
Speaker:an arms factory. But due to the level of secrecy and everything, I figured that's what it was
Speaker:or something along those lines. But the groups were not advertising themselves very heavily
Speaker:in that. One can understand that. So you were you were willing to show up, right? Put it
Speaker:on the line without needing full details. Yeah. Yeah, absolutely. I mean, we all know what's
Speaker:going on with Israel bombing Gaza relentlessly, genociding, trying to, it seems, liquidate
Speaker:Gaza. I mean, that has to be stopped. We have to do everything in our power to stop that
Speaker:here with the massive amount of military aid that Canada gives, as well as other aid. And
Speaker:Incas is one of many points that is doing that. I approach politics and anti-capitalism with
Speaker:the understanding to boil it down very heavily that capitalism only cares about money. There's
Speaker:only so much that begging a politician is going to do if you're not messing up their friend's
Speaker:money in the background. I mean, I think it's a similar approach we have to take to this
Speaker:that we have to take to strike action, right? That you have to fuck up their money so bad
Speaker:that they realize it is not profitable for them to keep doing this stuff. And that is... the
Speaker:goal and the hope and I think the approach we need to be looking at going forward in trying
Speaker:to lay out Palestinian solidarity and solidarity with oppressed peoples of the world. Awesome.
Speaker:We've brought it up a few times. Let's focus on labor's role in all of this, right? So we
Speaker:see the two of the main groups that organized that blockade against Incas are related to
Speaker:labor. Kind of, are they official caucuses within the labor or just kind of loosely formed by
Speaker:interested individuals? I don't know, we should probably have them on here to answer that.
Speaker:But either way, they're unionized workers that think, and I'm sure you're going to agree with
Speaker:me, Kay, and them, that labor has a role to play in dismantling the arms trade and fighting
Speaker:imperialism. Tell me, Kay, you got a call from workers in Palestine to take, you know, they
Speaker:had clear demands. And one of those was to pass motions within the trade unions, right? To
Speaker:get... unions officially to take a position on this. Is that doable? Is that work that's
Speaker:being done? Or is it going to be kind of more of like a wildcat? We're seeing a lot of longshoremen
Speaker:unions refusing to offload weapons destined for Israel disruptions in that way. Can we
Speaker:see Canadian Labor Act this way? Well, I echo what the comrades said earlier about really
Speaker:you got to hit where it hurts the most. for the ruling class, the wallet. It's really essential
Speaker:strategically and tactically to target these corporations, these arms manufacturers who
Speaker:are getting rich off the misery and the genocide of not only the Palestinians but oppressed
Speaker:masses of the world. And at the level of the principle, I echo what Gassan Qanafani said.
Speaker:He was a poet and writer. and revolutionary activist for the liberation of Palestine, said,
Speaker:quote, The Palestinian cause is not a cause for Palestinians only, but a cause for every
Speaker:revolutionary, wherever they are, as a cause of the exploited and oppressed masses in our
Speaker:era. This remains true today. It has been over half a century since he said this. But this
Speaker:era he talks about is the era of imperialism and what Lenin called the highest stage of
Speaker:capitalism. The liberation of Palestine would make a massive contribution to the liberation
Speaker:of the working class and oppressed people around the world. Mentally or materially? Both, I
Speaker:would say. I think it would deal a huge blow to the US imperialism and the creation of the
Speaker:single secular democratic state. for everyone in the Palestine would really, to say the least,
Speaker:loosen the grip of the US-led Western imperialism in the Middle East, West Asia, but world as
Speaker:a whole. It's nice to think about, isn't it? Like, just sit on that for a second, because
Speaker:I felt good to hear we're so caught up right now in saving Gaza that I think envisioning
Speaker:what... a free Palestine means to the entire world at this point, was kind of hard to think
Speaker:about until Kay said that. It would have an immense impact, both a positive one and a negative
Speaker:one on imperialists. So certainly just wanted to sit on that feeling for just a second because
Speaker:I think a lot of people agree, well, like they're nodding, right? They're going, absolutely.
Speaker:It's our duty. Yeah. Yeah, I'm there. I want to figure out how you get people to start doing.
Speaker:Economic disruption. How you pulling people along to get to that point? Because I think
Speaker:we're sold on its necessity, but There's courage needed right to realize yeah That's it. Yeah,
Speaker:and this is like one of these pivotal moments in history that if we did secure a victory
Speaker:such a visible victory it would be Immeasurably, I don't know how to describe it You guys know
Speaker:what I'm saying like that It's such an important goal right now and it feels like it is within
Speaker:our reach right even though it looks awful at the moment. We need more people showing up
Speaker:at facilities like Incas, you know, and there's an Elbit facility in Nova Scotia and probably
Speaker:a million other ways that we could get workers to use their power to really grind it to a
Speaker:halt. How do we get there? Yeah. So to bring it back to the working class, right? As I said,
Speaker:this is a call directly coming from the Palestinian workers. Even though the Palestinian struggle
Speaker:is struggle for national liberation, right? It concerns not just the working class, but
Speaker:you know, farmers and bedouins and you know, just the dispossessed people in general, you
Speaker:know, if you think about Gaza, the employment, youth unemployment rate is close to 70%. It's
Speaker:a simple definition of the proletariat or the working class doesn't really fit in. So it
Speaker:is a sort of like an attempt at broader class alliance and building a united front. The Looking
Speaker:at a long-term perspective on liberation, not just in Palestine, but around the world, the
Speaker:working class is the vanguard of socialism. They control the means of production, they
Speaker:create value. It's really important to situate this in a theoretical perspective in order
Speaker:to understand the importance of this action being carried out right now to target the economics
Speaker:of imperialism, to the economics of war. How is it integrated? How is the war industry?
Speaker:you know, arms manufacturer integrated into the workings of imperialism. So on how to get
Speaker:everyone or get more workers out, get the workers, the organizations of labor involved in it,
Speaker:we first off, we've seen labor is capable of getting involved, not so much in Canada, as
Speaker:far as I know, the groups, the labor groups that were involved in this are like, they're
Speaker:not official or under the protection of the larger labor bodies. These are groups. As far
Speaker:as I'm aware, mostly of staffers and white collar professionals. So not people on the shop floor
Speaker:so much, not factory workers or stuff like that, which is where you really need that organization
Speaker:to hit in order to massively affect these things. Someone from a university can't shut down,
Speaker:can't go on strike and shut down an arms factory. So a big part of getting this going is getting...
Speaker:there's understanding these politics to directly to these points, directly to people in factories
Speaker:that can make that impact. And we've seen that happen in Italy, in Belgium and South Africa.
Speaker:Belgium, three million workers all encompassed in these massive unions said they are not building
Speaker:and they are not touching anything going to Israel. Similar in Italy, similar in South
Speaker:Africa. So it is possible. Now, how it is we get there, I think. The victory for Palestine
Speaker:is a massive boon for the fight for socialism everywhere. That's a huge part of what keeps
Speaker:me going. I'm not doing this in charity. I'm not doing this in self-sacrifice. That's involved.
Speaker:It exists. But I'm doing this in solidarity. I'm doing this because every single blow against
Speaker:the Canadian imperialist war machine, the NATO imperialist war machine against Israel is a
Speaker:step towards my own liberation. It's a step towards seeing the friends that I've had since
Speaker:high school get out of working two jobs. It's a step towards not having my rent and grocery
Speaker:bill take up, you know, the vast majority of my pay and my life. And I think that's a really
Speaker:big part of working class politics that a lot of people don't really get at and have a hard
Speaker:time explaining and seeing. And I think... A large part of that is that they're not necessarily
Speaker:understanding that. That's why we emphasize, you know, theory and reading so much. Your
Speaker:brain tells your body what to do. I saw the transition happening. So you're talking about
Speaker:bringing the knowledge and the politics to the shop floor. I know that you are part of the
Speaker:communist worker circle reading group. And, you know, we go from blockading weapons manufacturers
Speaker:to talking about a reading group. Some may think like these are not the same tactics and it's
Speaker:all part of the same. class war, right? It is part of how you get there. And I think and
Speaker:I know you know this. I know, you know, people look at Marxist reading groups and roll their
Speaker:eyes and have some critiques around the accessibility of learning theory. So I'm going to give you
Speaker:some space to yeah. Oh, yeah, don't you worry. I wouldn't throw something like that and not
Speaker:let you say but take a moment to kind of talk about the importance of doing the educating
Speaker:together, you know collectively. So we'll let Kay hit on this as well, because I'm sure part
Speaker:of the internationalist movement is convincing people it needs to be an internationalist movement
Speaker:and beyond, right? A lot of people are even afraid of the word revolution. So let me let
Speaker:you defend your reading group first, because I kind of, you know, threw all that trash that
Speaker:people probably throw on you. And I'm sure you've heard it. Oh, absolutely. Absolutely. Yeah.
Speaker:I mean, I completely agree. I did not expect that. That's... My time as a communist has
Speaker:not been very long now. I got into it, I was introduced to it in the last round of my union
Speaker:bargaining, and have gotten more and more involved and more studied and active over the time.
Speaker:So this was like four years ago now. And the first few reading groups I joined really sucked.
Speaker:It was very much a go read this on your own. and then come back with questions. And then
Speaker:there's my ADHD blue collar self, eyes crossed staring at this book, trying to not like run
Speaker:away from it. You need to study buddy. Yeah, well, and this is an issue that a lot of blue
Speaker:collar workers have. We are used to working with our hands and we are very much kept away
Speaker:from academics or reading or anything like that. Like I finished high school, I didn't go back
Speaker:to a book. At that time, it had been two, three years since I'd picked up a book. And so the
Speaker:approach we have in the Common Worker Circle, the CWC, is we read out loud and we discuss
Speaker:as we go. It's slow, but as long as you're doing it consistently and you're talking with people,
Speaker:like you get through it, you get through a lot of reading. The books we're reading, like these
Speaker:are dense, dense books. So if you're staying consistent with them, you can actually get
Speaker:through a whole lot of theory with that very quickly. The other thing it really does, which
Speaker:can be a bit of an issue with like an academic approach to this study, is it keeps us from
Speaker:kind of learning this stuff in like hundred year old English, or an academic language or
Speaker:stuff like that. I like to say we learn at one time. in the language of Marx and then we learn
Speaker:it another time in the language of the proletariat. I like that. And that's the over the course
Speaker:of discussion, right? So that you can bring it to the workplace, you can bring it to conversations
Speaker:at the bar, you can bring it to wherever it is you're at and it doesn't sound or feel alien
Speaker:to the workers. Like you're trying to indoctrinate people. Yeah, exactly. Yeah, and there's like,
Speaker:there's levels to that, like as you become more accustomed to someone, you don't want to...
Speaker:like it's never about dumbing it down or anything like that. We trust the working class to be
Speaker:able to understand this stuff, to be able to take on, you know, a new word here and there
Speaker:or whatever. Because people inherently feel it, right? Sometimes they just need the words
Speaker:to explain it, but even when you talk to, you know, your conservative neighbor about issues,
Speaker:like they feel oppressed, like they talk, they just don't know where to punch. Sometimes,
Speaker:right? They've been taught to punch down and you know, you got to kind of redirect them
Speaker:but They they do feel oppressed as workers all of them. Yep. Yes, I can see how people quickly
Speaker:Come along once You know, they have the theory I paid for my education like I went to political
Speaker:science is my degree. So I guess we could call those reading circles of sorts, you know, that
Speaker:isn't accessible for everybody I think a lot of people get frustrated especially when we
Speaker:talk about the labor movement and why they're not more progressive as a whole, right? As
Speaker:though it's like some leftist group and not just a representation of a portion of the working
Speaker:class, right? And so how to bring their politics along is a part of a lot of the discussions,
Speaker:right? And how we get a general strike when we need it. How do we get more militant leaders
Speaker:to the top of unions who understand what their role is, what their role is supposed to be,
Speaker:right? And a lot of that has to do with getting people that political education that they no
Speaker:longer get. I'll PS in general, but particularly at CPSO, you know, we take political education
Speaker:very seriously. You know, we sort of inherit that tradition of the revolutionary movement
Speaker:in the Philippines. Where we do this thing called Eds, which stands for educational discussions.
Speaker:There are certain texts that all members of the organization have to go through. You know,
Speaker:read and discuss. One of them is Philippine society and revolution. The Philippines through
Speaker:a Marxist perspective, how the country developed and how it became colonized, forced by Spain,
Speaker:the United States, and Japan, back to the United States, and how that revolutionary movement
Speaker:developed. In response to that, you know, with the desire to create a new society, liberated
Speaker:Philippines, moving towards socials. And another text is called Araring Activista. In Tagalog,
Speaker:it means activist studies. It's more a practical text. It's more about organization. It's about
Speaker:democratic centralism, just the Marxist method of leadership, combining democracy and centralized
Speaker:leadership, a community system. So this is where we discuss more of what it means to be an activist,
Speaker:how we should organize, how we should advance the revolution, how do we work with the masses,
Speaker:and things like that. These are really important we go through. And we also do other like EDs
Speaker:that are, you know, cater to particular topics like migrant workers, peasants and what have
Speaker:you, right? So that's the sort of tradition I come out of. And I'm quite proud of that
Speaker:and really clarified how I think about activism and organizing in general. And another point
Speaker:that I want to make is that, you know, we've been talking about theory and practice, you
Speaker:know, how do we synthesize them? How do we, you know, have a clear understanding of its
Speaker:interrelation, their interrelation. And I just want to say that the practice itself can be
Speaker:educational. So talking about this particular action, right? Learning on the line, you mean?
Speaker:Yes, exactly. Putting the boots on the ground and what have you. So this action, like other
Speaker:actions that I participated in the past, disrupting business as usual really exposes the contradictions
Speaker:of capitalism, imperialism, and settler colonialism. that are usually hidden under the facade of
Speaker:normals, these actions really explore them out in the open. At this action, we saw an unhinged
Speaker:anger of Inca employees and executives. And Fuo happened to be like hardcore pro-Zionist,
Speaker:terrorizing us, terrorizing the protesters, snatching and destroying our signs and banners.
Speaker:They actually took our ILPS banner and ripped it apart. And they did that to other... cameras
Speaker:there as well and lots of pushing and shoving. Not to mention that they all were protected
Speaker:and escorted by the armed agents of the state, the Toronto police. Despite all the violence
Speaker:that these Zionists committed against us, it was us, seven of us who got arrested. None
Speaker:of them, for all the pushing and shoving, none of them got arrested. So obviously don't have
Speaker:to lecture you about this complicity of the police. Yeah, it was really out in the open.
Speaker:really exposed it and it was, I think, a big learning moment for all of us. And in a way,
Speaker:really reenacted the violence Palestinians experience every day inside so-called Israel and the occupied
Speaker:territories. It's a bit of an exaggeration, I admit, but it does really kind of, to quote
Speaker:this old slogan by the Weather Underground, you know, bringing the war home, like bringing
Speaker:the occupation of Palestine back to Canada. Actions like this are hugely educational. It
Speaker:definitely was educational for me. And yeah, there's a lot we can learn from it. So I think
Speaker:you've demonstrated, and I know before we started recording, Martin spoke of his experience at
Speaker:Victoria Park Collegiate protest, counter protest to protect trans youth and had similar reaction
Speaker:from protesters antagonizing and being protected by police. and then the arrests being one sided.
Speaker:So certainly anybody who goes to these actions and lives and experiences this, you know, the
Speaker:mask is gone, right? Quickly, you understand what police are actually there for when you
Speaker:do experience. I totally understand what you're talking about, but it drives home the point
Speaker:there that although escalated tactics are needed, community defense actions are needed, they
Speaker:aren't without risk. because you are going up against an incredible machine, right? And they
Speaker:all work and connected with one another. And it surprises me the employees that workers
Speaker:felt the need to do that, you know, like they just had no class consciousness whatsoever.
Speaker:I mean, it does surprise me and it doesn't but obviously the police responses a surprise me
Speaker:at all. How do you prepare like let's get a little practical. How do you prepare people
Speaker:going into these actions? Right? To stay as safe as possible or... It's a tough one, right?
Speaker:Because when you put that call out, you are asking a lot of people. So I think there is,
Speaker:as an organizer, I would think it would be an inherent responsibility of mine to at least
Speaker:adequately prepare them. I know some legal fund solidarity actions are necessary, but I'm talking
Speaker:about like before the fact. So do either of you have any kind of tips for people? going
Speaker:to actions that are going to be met with resistance. I mean, all of our actions are kind of now
Speaker:being met with resistance, but I mean police force, right? So anytime a railway is blocked,
Speaker:anytime real economic stops are put in, injunctions surely follow and then police action. So Martin.
Speaker:So I think first and foremost, no one there... Even at the point of getting contacted, no
Speaker:one there was new to this. I recognize a great number of the faces from previous actions and
Speaker:this, that, and the other thing. Everyone had the experience to be there. And that was part
Speaker:of that approach to organizing of going point-to-point. You have to go in with the understanding, you
Speaker:have to tell people that there's the possibility you get arrested. There is the possibility
Speaker:that stuff gets violent. This protest was... in some way, the use of cars. So there are
Speaker:two lines. I was at one that was more involved in blocking cars at the front. I've blocked
Speaker:a lot of cars in my time. These guys were putting the cars into the line. I have never had a
Speaker:car make contact with me. It happened three times on this line, as well as one time where
Speaker:a car sped by so quick within a half meter of one of the... protestors and swerved up onto
Speaker:the side of the road right next to our lines in front of a police in front of the police.
Speaker:I also wanted to say I don't as any military office and also in case in Canada does a lot
Speaker:of like moving money. They have massive armored vehicles, they go pick up ATMs and stuff. They
Speaker:have a massive security force there, as you'd expect from what I saw the workers that I saw.
Speaker:that were aggressive. But from what I saw, the workers were sitting across the street. Like,
Speaker:that's weird, eh? They were not the aggressive ones. It was managers. It was security. It
Speaker:was lead hands who were really attacking our lives. I was going to say, I won't lie, like
Speaker:as a worker, if I showed up and there was a picket line across the gate to get in, I'd
Speaker:be kind of stoked. Right. Like, I mean, that's my personal bias. But yeah, playing into that.
Speaker:And to your point, though, Martin. You want to bring people along though, right? So yes,
Speaker:definitely warn people that they're going to be arrested. Having access to someone willing
Speaker:to act as a legal representative is also kind of critical work to do ahead of time. I'll
Speaker:warn folks, I mean, back in the day when we used to organize, I mean, like back in G20
Speaker:days, we would write the number of legal aid on our arm. We now know better not to do that.
Speaker:you need to memorize a phone number or write it somewhere inconspicuous because police will
Speaker:use that to target you. But yes, mentally preparing people is important and training people, even
Speaker:if you feel like they're prepared. But I understand like there's some actions like this where you
Speaker:really just got to find some trusted individuals. And I think that's quite how the coordinated
Speaker:sit-ins worked. across Canada, a lot of people are like, why didn't I know about this? I wanted
Speaker:to do it. And the reality is, is you gotta make sure those are absolutely trusted comrades
Speaker:that understand the risk and have a modicum of understanding on how to react in those situations,
Speaker:right? But it is, like if you wanna pull people along, we've gotta make sure like they, they're
Speaker:not just fired up because they know, but they feel like they're equipped as well. You can't
Speaker:prepare yourself for anything, but. hearing about the violence on the lines. That has just
Speaker:been an increasing trend. And then the other big thing is making sure that there's a clear
Speaker:defined leadership on the lines or in the action, who when you don't know what's going on, what
Speaker:it is you're supposed to be doing, that you can turn to and, you know, ask what's up. Again,
Speaker:in the Inca's action, that was the... There were two picket captains we were all instructed
Speaker:to go to. And that is huge for making it possible for new people to join up. Find that person
Speaker:with a tattered up flag when things get, get heavy. Find the person with, you know, busted
Speaker:boots. You know, the type who's been marching and ask them what's up. Well. They usually,
Speaker:they should be wearing a reflective vest if they know their shit, right? At least. The
Speaker:bottom line is that there's no like 100% safety, right? Like there's no risk-proof protest action.
Speaker:I think of what Mao said, revolution is not a dinner party, right? There's always going
Speaker:to be risk. There's always going to be a risk of arrest, doxing, and what have you. And you
Speaker:know, certain actions have definitely increased the risk than others. So I think that's the
Speaker:bottom line. So, you know, it shouldn't really let us paralyze and not do anything. The stake
Speaker:is really high. However, you know, there are precautions we can take to, you know, to quote
Speaker:the often used slogan, you know, we keep each other safe. That's the name of our first episode.
Speaker:Oh, okay. You know, go in groups, don't go alone, you know, especially to actions like this,
Speaker:right? Have a signal chat. communicate, and have a rendezvous spot, discuss what the plans
Speaker:are. You know, the recent rallies and marches that I went with my comrades, you know, we
Speaker:first we gather in a big group and form a like a buddy system, smaller groups, and you know,
Speaker:we stay together, you know, don't leave each other, don't wander out, just stick together.
Speaker:You know, it really requires an organization and a collective effort to ensure the security
Speaker:of your comrades. Yeah, that's what I recommend to do in addition to what you and Martin said
Speaker:already. Yeah, I will definitely link in the show notes some of our you know, the infographics
Speaker:that folks have put together for you know, basic safety at protests. I want to go back to something
Speaker:Kay said at the beginning of the interview, because like I said, I think a lot of people
Speaker:are sold on the need to escalate actions, right? They've been to a few marches.
Speaker:The weapons flow has not stopped. And Kay, you mentioned the need to resist by any means necessary.
Speaker:You can't drop something like that without me giving you the space to explain that. I feel
Speaker:like I know what you mean. And I feel a lot of people, and we've talked about it on the
Speaker:show, for people not to shy away from Palestinian right to armed resistance. as part of capitulating
Speaker:in this moment, as part of just trying to get more people along for the ceasefire. And the
Speaker:demands to disarm Hamas would be to remove all matter of defense from Palestinians in Gaza.
Speaker:So we're friends on this front, right? You're not going to find me arguing with you on that
Speaker:point. But what people are going to hear sometimes, right, is what... has been weaponized against
Speaker:the left in recent days and weeks, particularly, you know, Fred Hahn has a good high profile
Speaker:example of then almost being accused of celebrating the most horrific acts of an armed group, any
Speaker:armed group. Right. And so that makes bringing people along difficult. Right. This the narrative
Speaker:that's going around Palestinian resistance, right? You've heard it, you've felt it, right?
Speaker:So it's an uncomfortable place to be right now to assert that point. So expand on it a little
Speaker:bit. I think it's really important to know, especially now with the barrage of propaganda
Speaker:coming from the Zionist state and its allies, imperialist allies, media wing. Hamas is only
Speaker:one organization among others who are resisting the occupation. There are other organizations
Speaker:that are more secular or even some of them are even more conservative than Hamas. So we have
Speaker:Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine, Democratic Front for the Liberation of Palestine,
Speaker:and Islamic Jihad and many others. The Palestinian resistance is a united front. It's a national
Speaker:united front. They may have some disagreements at the level of ideology, but they all agree
Speaker:on resisting it. the occupation and the genocide by any means necessary. You know, obviously
Speaker:by any means necessary goes both ways, right? We all know that there is a variety of tactics
Speaker:employed to politically isolate the Zionist entity. The point is to make them look unreasonable,
Speaker:to put it mildly, and you know, they're the ones who are doing aggression. It's becoming
Speaker:clear and clear every day that they're breaking all international law you can think of. You
Speaker:know, anyone with any sense of humanitarian conscience would... object to it. But we also
Speaker:at the same time have to acknowledge that these resistance organizations are at the forefront
Speaker:of the resistance. You know, there is a telegram channel called Resistance News Network, where
Speaker:they update every tactical operation. Statements coming out of the political bureau, it's all
Speaker:there. It's basically my phone has been ringing nonstop. These nonstop notifications coming
Speaker:from... So if folks haven't subscribed to it, I recommend, highly recommend. signing up to
Speaker:it. But yeah, these are the people we should be listening to because they're on the front
Speaker:line. You know, we hear a lot about ceasefire, but at this point, none of these organizations
Speaker:are endorsing ceasefire. So, you know, which makes sense because, you know, ceasefire implies
Speaker:there are two belligerent parties involved in armed conflict, which is true to a certain
Speaker:extent, but it's not that the power dynamic is completely disproportionate. There's only
Speaker:one side that is committing genocide. You know, there's only one side that are killing thousands
Speaker:and thousands of children, you know, and they even call it like mowing the grass, right?
Speaker:Like it's, it's fascism plain and simple. It doesn't really make any sense at this point
Speaker:to, to ask the resistance to stop firing. We need to demand, stop the bombings of Gaza,
Speaker:right? Stop the massacres, stop the genocide. I want to just develop on that point for a
Speaker:second, because that's going to be hard for people to hear, right? Because that's the like
Speaker:one message you've been able to get liberals, some liberals to utter. And it's like, this
Speaker:point, right? This like, if we could just get them to demand a ceasefire, you know, they're
Speaker:good, right? That's all we need Biden to do. One, we shouldn't be celebrating such a small,
Speaker:small gesture in terms of ending the occupation, but it's that issue of ceasefire or no ceasefire.
Speaker:Because one would think there is only one call, right? Like it does seem pretty united here
Speaker:in the West that folks are demanding a ceasefire. But what they're actually asking is for the
Speaker:bombs to stop dropping on their heads. And folks need to remember in the sense of the occupation,
Speaker:that's not over. And we still assert that there's the are they have a right to resist the occupation
Speaker:with arms, with violence. I'm not going to get into what kind of violence that it's an illegal
Speaker:occupation. They can resist it. If a ceasefire is called the bombs may stop dropping on Gaza,
Speaker:but the resistance still needs to remain. So what do they do? They will be in violation
Speaker:of a ceasefire when they start to resist again, when they need to resist again, right? Because
Speaker:they're gonna need to resist again. They're still under occupation. Life is not going to
Speaker:get better in Gaza, especially now, right? So the need for a free Palestine has never even
Speaker:been more important. So there's no way you can turn to this network, right? So thank you for
Speaker:making that very important point that it's not just Hamas, that it is a coalition of people
Speaker:of all ideological, because that uses a gotcha. They're very conservative. How can you be backing
Speaker:Hamas and their resistance and whatnot? We're backing a Palestinian collective resistance
Speaker:that is determined by Palestinians. And so I understand a ceasefire. This is me like pleading
Speaker:with the audience because I know that my guests understand. Yes, a ceasefire. Yes, we want
Speaker:what is happening in Gaza to stop. But you have to understand the importance of K making that
Speaker:point of how that frames the entire conflict then. Everyone's always searching for a word,
Speaker:like conflict doesn't seem adequate. It's not a war, right? So a ceasefire technically isn't
Speaker:the term, but it would really hamper the ability for Palestinians to resist after that. And
Speaker:it would only take the smallest fucking excuse from Israel to say that the ceasefire had been
Speaker:broken and then, and then whatever they do would be justified fully, right? Cause it would be
Speaker:like, they broke the ceasefire. We finally agreed to that. We were reasonable. They would come
Speaker:off looking reasonable. and they would be able to continue their erasure of Gaza after that.
Speaker:Because the armed resistance will not stop. Even if some leaders get into a room and sign
Speaker:ceasefire papers, or if that's how it fucking happens, I don't even know these days, right?
Speaker:You know, that won't matter to the people of Palestine who are losing their land in the
Speaker:West Bank and are continually confined in Gaza. Especially now you've got to picture Gaza,
Speaker:it's cut in half. Israel's bragged this morning about cutting it in half. So they won't ever
Speaker:relent that line. you are going to have a north and south Gaza if they even let Palestinians
Speaker:back in the north. And so surely, surely armed resistance will be necessary. I didn't know
Speaker:if we'd get around to that point. We've kind of been tossing it around on the show, but
Speaker:Kay you really set us up to kind of get at that. And again, it's one of those, another uncomfortable
Speaker:spots because we feel like we're building on ceasefire language, right? We're trying to
Speaker:get everyone to come to that point, but that point isn't enough. Right. Linda Sarsour, she
Speaker:had a great speech that I screen recorded because, you know, it did something for me there. But
Speaker:she's like, after the park, you know, after the ceasefire, you cannot turn your back on
Speaker:us. We are still here. We are still resisting. Like, this is not that is not over. Yeah, I've
Speaker:been grappling with that myself. So I appreciate you bringing it up. OK, Martin, you've had
Speaker:your head up for so long. I feel bad. But I needed to let go on that. No, absolutely. That's
Speaker:I mean, I think that's. The ceasefire demand in the West is the biggest political question
Speaker:we have right now. And I think figuring that out is integral to developing harder tactics
Speaker:and to solidifying resistance here. I wanted to come in with a quote first off by Walter
Speaker:Rodney, who's an Afro-Guyanese revolutionary. But what standard of morality can the violence
Speaker:used by a slave to break his chains? be considered the same as the violence of a slave master.
Speaker:I think that's a really important way to approach this, a way to consider the whole situation.
Speaker:I have been skeptical and I'm now pretty solidly opposed to the ceasefire demand. I think that
Speaker:is a both sides argument and a both sides position. Encased in the idea of a ceasefire is Palestinians
Speaker:dropping their guns. There are situations in which a ceasefire is necessary and correct.
Speaker:I'm for stopping the bombs on Gaza. I am for beating Israel here at home, cutting off their
Speaker:military support, but an internationally mandated, a UN mandated or agreed upon ceasefire. I don't
Speaker:think it makes sense in the current time. So like a ceasefire, it's not this ideological
Speaker:thing, everyone comes, shakes hands, it's cool. It's usually put in place or agreed upon that
Speaker:there's a protectorate. put in place here? Who's going to be the protector of Palestine in the
Speaker:world today? Who is it that the US is going to agree to, to allow to be the protector and
Speaker:the Palestinians to agree to be the protector? You have historically, you have a couple different
Speaker:Arab nations coming in to be the protector of Palestine. And then not caring as Israel goes
Speaker:and takes it on. And also who is it that has the military power to face this massive military
Speaker:base in the West. Like the people who maybe are separate enough in this, that aren't pro-US
Speaker:enough in this, are never going to be allowed to be the arbiter of the ceasefire. So it's
Speaker:going to be Palestine relying on people who have funded their genocide. And I think that's
Speaker:really a... I don't think that can happen functionally. We also know, we've all known about Palestine.
Speaker:and research Palestine in this last little bit, enough to know exactly what you were saying.
Speaker:Whatever, Israel is not gonna stop. There have been lines drawn on the map and Israel has
Speaker:always pushed forward beyond them. The state of Israel is going to continue to take out
Speaker:Palestine. And if it's not the state actively doing it, they're endorsing settlers to do
Speaker:it. What's gonna happen in a ceasefire is that settlers are going to continue to attack. There's
Speaker:going to be occasional bombings. It's gonna... revert to what it was last year, where there's
Speaker:only a few hundred Palestinians dying constantly and a few hundred getting taken to prison camps
Speaker:instead of the thousands a day. But then once the next October 7th happens, once the next
Speaker:time a olive farmer shoots back because there's a hundred Israeli settlers coming at their
Speaker:house, it's going to be Hamas attacked civilians. It's going to be Palestine broke the ceasefire.
Speaker:attacking civilians. And it's going to return exactly to where it is today, if not more so
Speaker:because we have to remember that on October 7th, Israel was the weakest militarily it has
Speaker:been in a very long time. And after that reminder, everyone in the West who supports Israel has
Speaker:been pumping money in to Israel. So over the course of the ceasefire, over the course of
Speaker:whatever that is, Israel is going to remilitarize, get stronger, and the possibilities for effective
Speaker:resistance are going to become smaller and smaller. So if we're talking freeing Palestine and we're
Speaker:talking supporting the resistance, I understand where it comes from. You see the atrocities
Speaker:being committed and you need it to stop. I don't think a lot of people understand that ceasefire
Speaker:means both sides drop the guns. We see it and we say we want our guns to stop. And I'm for
Speaker:that. Yes, the common narrative is very frustrating to me that Hamas must disarm, but we wouldn't
Speaker:even fathom asking that of Israel, despite the differential in casualties, civilian casualties.
Speaker:Like it's state sanctioned violence only, right? Everyone swallows it, even though, you know,
Speaker:anybody who has stepped back and looked at it, we throw our hands up in the air and go, Are
Speaker:you guys serious? Can you not see the hypocrisy? But you know, we're so trained to only see
Speaker:state violence as the only legitimate violence, right? And everyone else is a terrorist. Even
Speaker:folks that should know better still kind of swallow that line whole, but we're eating away
Speaker:at it bit by bit. But Martin brought us kind of full circle again to, yes, that is a good
Speaker:point. Israel will likely be more armed after this because we've seen pledges of support
Speaker:and billions more going. I just kind of scoffed when you said that though, like when they were
Speaker:at their weakest. I'm like, well, they spend 12% of their budget on the military. They spend
Speaker:more per capita on their military than anywhere else. They're kind of close to South Korea,
Speaker:but still not even close. per capita, not even close to Russia. And they need help. So full
Speaker:circle, we're back to cutting off the weapons supply for everyone. Well, going back to our
Speaker:politicians over and over again for every kind of incremental change perhaps isn't the answer,
Speaker:but a more internationalist movement like the ILPS and other internationalists propose. But
Speaker:do you wanna kind of, where do we go from here? comment. You don't have to tell me what's going
Speaker:on in your signal chat, or you can, if there's any. But where do folks go? Pan National Day
Speaker:of Action is planned for November 12th. That's still six days away from the day that we're
Speaker:recording this. Where do we go in terms of really disrupting imperialism and more specifically
Speaker:the arms trade? Yeah, I just wanted to sort of add to what the comrade said earlier. There's
Speaker:a saying in the... National Democratic Movement in the Philippines. The key is to be firm in
Speaker:principle, but flexible in tactic. There's a lot of similarities between the Palestinian
Speaker:resistance and the National Democratic Movement, namely that there are two aspects to the movement.
Speaker:In the Philippines, the movement divides into legal mass movement, represented by various
Speaker:mass organizations like Bayan Philippines, Anak Bayan, and Gabriela, and there are many, many
Speaker:other organizations that represent particular sectors of Philippine society. These are the
Speaker:legitimate mass organizations that relate directly to the masses, mostly in the cities. And there
Speaker:is another aspect to it, which is an underground armed struggle led by the Communist Party of
Speaker:the Philippines, New People's Army, which is an armed mass organization of the guerrilla
Speaker:army of the movement. And there's also the National Democratic Front of the Philippines. So these
Speaker:three organizations constitute a sort of triangle of the underground revolutionary movement.
Speaker:And all three are outlawed. They're illegal in the Philippines, of course, in other countries
Speaker:as well. I can only imagine the penalty would be stiff. Philippines is known for quite the
Speaker:law and order approach. They use scare quotes there. Yeah. So we have the son of Marcus,
Speaker:you know, Felde and the Marcus, Junior. He is the, you know, the Marcus dynasty is back in
Speaker:power. Also, you know, together with the daughter of Rodrigo de Tiltes, who was notorious for
Speaker:killing people left and right. Just, you know, take, you know, quote unquote, cleaning up
Speaker:drug addicts from the streets, criminalizing activists, you know. being a rabid anti-communist,
Speaker:just to name a few, right? But that's throughout the history. These are the puppet regimes of
Speaker:imperialism, the US, Canada, and other states. My point is that these three, the underground
Speaker:component is the primary field of struggle. They are the vanguard of the revolution. What
Speaker:the legal mass movement does is to highlight the root cause. A lot of Filipinos people prefer
Speaker:that there is no armed conflict. They prefer that there is justice, right? There's no peace
Speaker:without justice. The objective of the legal mass movement is to highlight the underlying
Speaker:issues, underlying relations of exploitation and oppression created by imperialism, the
Speaker:root cause of the armed struggle. In a word, to highlight the legitimacy of the armed struggle.
Speaker:It is a just struggle for liberation and for socialism. That's what is needed to bring justice
Speaker:to Filipino people. So there's two aspects of it. The idea is to politically isolate the
Speaker:Philippine state, you know, make them look very unreasonable and very, they are the ones that
Speaker:for committing all the injustice. They're the PR firm of the movement. Yeah. They're getting
Speaker:the talking points out and politically positioning the movement. Yes? Yeah, not necessarily, yeah,
Speaker:PR, but like, they do the concrete. mass organizing with the working class and dispossessed masses,
Speaker:peasants also, women, youth, many others. So they're not simply doing PR, but they're two
Speaker:components of the movement. Even though they're separate, they represent their strive for the
Speaker:same goal, the liberation of the Philippines from imperialism, semi-feudalism. and bureaucratic
Speaker:capitalism. The third one is kind of like a very corrupt form of capitalism, represented
Speaker:by the very close tie between government officials and bureaucrats with the private farms and
Speaker:landed estates, you know, still operates with the mechanism inherited from the era of Spanish
Speaker:colonialism, like hachiendas and plantations and what have you, right? Bringing it back
Speaker:to the Palestinian resistance, I think there's a similar dynamic at play here. There's armed
Speaker:resistance. is the forefront of the struggle. But there's various other organizations like
Speaker:Palestinian workers, right, that they're just putting out the call, that they're, you know,
Speaker:they're different in tactics, but they're striving for the same goal. One notable difference is
Speaker:that the Philippines is semi-colonial and Palestine is colonial. It's directly occupied by hostile
Speaker:colonial power, whereas the Philippines is formally independent, you know. I know when you say
Speaker:semi, it means to me it sounds like half, but it's just like, it's really appearances sake,
Speaker:right? It's a formality. Exactly. Precisely. Because in the material life of a Philippine
Speaker:worker, it's colonial. The difference notwithstanding, there's a, you know, the similarity in tactics
Speaker:and strategy that these two movements employ. And I think our job here in the Imperial Corps
Speaker:is in the legal sphere, educate the people about the legitimacy. of the armed struggle, right?
Speaker:If we don't want Hamas and other resistance organizations to exist, the state of Israel
Speaker:has to dissolve and become a one democratic secular state for everyone, you know, whether
Speaker:Jewish, Arabs, Palestinians, similar in the Philippines. If you don't want this armed conflict
Speaker:to exist, this semi-feudal, semi-colonial system has to dissolve. And Philippines have to be...
Speaker:genuinely democratic. It has to be liberated from the imperialism first so it can move towards
Speaker:social. So yeah, the point is to basically, our job is to educate people about the right
Speaker:of armed struggle. The resistance is just and must be supported and we have to really nail
Speaker:that point to everybody. So in terms of moving forward, where do we go from here? So IOPs
Speaker:has an active anti-war campaign, anti-militarization campaign, around three... One is three point
Speaker:demands. One is Canada out of NATO. Second is to stop the technical port for reactionary
Speaker:regimes, including the Zionist regime, the Philippine state, and Saudi, Saudi Arabia. Do you guys
Speaker:have a list? The list goes on. It's a lot. Yeah, no, I'm like, I imagine that's a long list.
Speaker:There's like 196 countries. It's probably like 160 of them. And third demand is the stop the
Speaker:arms trade. So this is what drove me to this action, right? It's consistent with the campaign.
Speaker:And actually we co-organized the Kancuk protests in Ottawa in late May with Warp Beyond War.
Speaker:It was ILPS Canada and Warp Beyond War that put on the protests. It happens every year.
Speaker:It's been going on for decades actually. It was also very educational. Like I said earlier,
Speaker:it was, you know, we confronted a lot of these people in suits just walking into the venue
Speaker:of some of the biggest. arms trade show in the world. You know, the police was violent towards
Speaker:us. They were escorted and protected by the police. Same thing. That was part of our campaign
Speaker:as well. And we work with various other organizations who don't necessarily share our politics to
Speaker:oppose, you know, to put forward these demands and, you know, really fighting imperialism
Speaker:in the belly of the beast. And yeah, November 8th is the International Day of Action Against
Speaker:Arms Companies, Weapons Companies. profiting from the genocide in Palestine. There are actions
Speaker:planned all over North America and beyond. ILPS Canada is responding to this call by the resist
Speaker:US-led war movements. So they're the initiator of the Day of Action. So it's actually days
Speaker:of action. There are also actions planned on the 9th as well. But you know, this struggle
Speaker:is obviously continuing beyond these two days. So yeah, if you're interested in learning more
Speaker:about ILPS, if your organization is interested, IOPs is an alliance of organizations. So if
Speaker:your organization's interested, find us on social media. We're on both Instagram and Facebook.
Speaker:Don't worry about dropping that. I will make sure everyone is linked back to both of your
Speaker:work and your organizations so that they can learn more about you, but also perhaps get
Speaker:involved in what you're doing. Yeah, on my end, we've... focused more so on labor work, organizing
Speaker:within labor. Labor's response to this has been sad. Most of labor seems more, has put more
Speaker:effort into beating down Fred Hahn for not criticizing Hamas first, foremost, and above everything
Speaker:than it has doing anything to help Palestinians or even being pacifists and taking both sides.
Speaker:Functionally, they have taken a pro-Israeli stance. And that's despite the vast number
Speaker:of trade unionists I know, and like going to marches, I'm seeing a lot of union hats, I'm
Speaker:seeing a lot of union jackets, but no union flags, because people and trade unionists are
Speaker:scared about the repercussions that we're going to receive from our unions for not backing
Speaker:the Canadian imperialist government. That is pathetic because it's the same Canadian imperialist
Speaker:government that votes us back to work and break strikes. It's the same imperialist government
Speaker:that's been promising things to workers for generations now and has never done any of that,
Speaker:regardless of what party it is. Orange, red or blue, doesn't matter who. That's a t-shirt.
Speaker:And we need to get through that. The workers... The Palestinian youth movement of North America
Speaker:is right now the biggest mobilizer of workers that is out there, despite the unions not being
Speaker:on board with it. And so breaking through that, I think it's twofold. It's the political, it's
Speaker:getting over, because I think the unions see the peacefire demand for exactly what it is.
Speaker:And they're using that. It's a both sides argument. It's a both sides position. And when you're
Speaker:for both sides, or when you oppose both sides equally, And why do you do anything? So getting
Speaker:over that politically, I think is a massive importance. And then it's also building enough
Speaker:power from the base from not trying to rush through and go to the OFL or CUPI national,
Speaker:but from your local, from your building that you work at and demanding, or even just taking
Speaker:flags from a steward and showing up to these marches, not as individuals. but as part of
Speaker:a collection of workers, as part of a union, and demonstrating to, you know, the politicians
Speaker:of labor who think or who understand really at this point that if they step up, they're
Speaker:kind of going to be alone. They're not going to have the support because they don't see
Speaker:that support. So building from the base, showing that if you stand up to Israel, if you stand
Speaker:up for Palestine, that you're... not going to be thrown out of the House of Labour because
Speaker:we have so many people that have your back and that's the way we have to build in labour.
Speaker:That's how we're going to get to the point of forcing the OFL to say, no, we're not moving
Speaker:any arms for Israel. We're not building any arms for Israel. That's how we're going to
Speaker:get to the point of not a few hour long picket, but having picket lines set up at Incas every
Speaker:single second of every single day. until Palestine is free. That's how we're going to get to the
Speaker:point of really taking out the war machine that is Canada. So that's the goal. Slowly but surely,
Speaker:I've gotten two, three co-workers out to Palestine marches. So long way to go. But that's the,
Speaker:I mean, I think that's the next step for escalation on the labor front. Yes, Martin. Please remember,
Speaker:it's not your job to bring everybody along. So those are victories when you bring people
Speaker:along. that personal work, that local work is often a lot harder, right? It's more intimate
Speaker:and it does require that kind of heavy lifting that you have to do sometimes. Discussions,
Speaker:hard discussions. Again, I hope our audience is a little bit better equipped to have some
Speaker:of those discussions with people because they've heard from the both of you. I thank you very
Speaker:much for coming on the show and for the work that you do on the ground. I feel like we could
Speaker:talk about... this and so many other tangents. I feel like we could have probably pulled like
Speaker:three or four episodes out of here. I wasn't sure what I was going to focus in on, but we
Speaker:hit some really key points and yeah, I'm grateful for this discussion. So thank you, K and thank
Speaker:you, Martin. And please keep up your good work. Yeah, thank you so much for having me. Solidarity.
Speaker:That is a wrap on another episode of Blueprints of Disruption. Thank you for joining us. Also,
Speaker:a very big thank you to the producer of our show, Santiago Helu Quintero. Blueprints of
Speaker:Disruption is an independent production operated cooperatively. You can follow us on Twitter
Speaker:at BPofDisruption. If you'd like to help us continue disrupting the status quo, please
Speaker:share our content. And if you have the means, consider becoming a patron. Not only does our
Speaker:support come from the progressive community, so does our content. So reach out to us and
Speaker:let us know what or who we should be amplifying. So until next time, keep disrupting.