Speaker:

Greetings friends. My name is Jess McLean and I'm here to provide you with some blueprints

Speaker:

of disruption. This weekly podcast is dedicated to amplifying the work of activists, examining

Speaker:

power structures and sharing the success stories from the grassroots. Through these discussions,

Speaker:

we hope to provide folks with the tools and the inspiration they need to start to dismantle

Speaker:

capitalism, decolonize our spaces and bring about the political revolution that we know

Speaker:

we need. Palestinian workers have issued calls for solidarity, specifically to their fellow

Speaker:

workers inside the imperialist core. That is most of us. They are asking work be done to

Speaker:

enlist the labor movement in ending not just the current siege on Gaza, but the occupation

Speaker:

of Palestine. These next two guests are answering some of those key demands, which are, at their

Speaker:

core, economic disruptions aimed to isolate Israel politically. and cut off their well-funded

Speaker:

supply of arms. We talked about the blockade of Incas in Toronto on our episode, Shutting

Speaker:

It Down for Palestine. It was an action organised by a coalition of workers from different organisations

Speaker:

who stood side by side outside the facility where technology, used in Israeli aggression,

Speaker:

is made. We will hear what that was like first hand and how they got there in terms of strategy.

Speaker:

But we'll also hear the ideology behind an internationalist struggle. for human emancipation, one that

Speaker:

focuses on disarming the imperialist powers rather than negotiate with them. Once we get

Speaker:

there and agree that an escalation of tactics is needed, the question becomes how to generate

Speaker:

the critical mass needed to really disrupt that system, to stop the bombs on Gaza and liberate

Speaker:

Palestine for our own liberation. A key component is clearly organized labor. Globally, workers

Speaker:

are taking a stand and refusing to transport Israeli weapons or refusing to offload them

Speaker:

at major ports. Just as I record this intro, activists in Vancouver are occupying the offices

Speaker:

of Zim, Israel's largest shipping line that supplies weapons to the IOF. This is part of

Speaker:

the larger block the boat and stop arming Israel actions taking place all across the world.

Speaker:

This week also saw activists in Oakland cling to the side of a ship. loaded with weapons

Speaker:

destined for Israel, a boat that had been used to do the same in the Iraq and Afghanistan

Speaker:

wars. They prevented it from leaving for nine hours. As the boat left, they chanted, we will

Speaker:

see you at the next stop, implying comrades across the water will help stop, or at least

Speaker:

slow, the flow of arms to be used against the Palestinian people. And that's exactly what

Speaker:

has been happening. That same boat was stalled up the coast in Tacoma, Washington. where canoes

Speaker:

used by Coast Salish territory activists were blocking the boat from leaving the port. Workers

Speaker:

in Barcelona have refused to load shipments bound for Israel. Australian activists have

Speaker:

done the same and are planning more for November 11th. This is indeed a global movement. Canadian

Speaker:

workers also have a role to play here too. So we get into that and just how we get them to

Speaker:

come along in such a critical moment in the struggle. against imperialism. So let's get

Speaker:

started. Welcome to the show. Can you introduce yourself please? Hi, I'm Martin. I work as

Speaker:

a caretaker. I'm a rank and file member of Toronto education workers, QP local 4400. And I'm part

Speaker:

of the Communist Workers Circle, communist study group that focuses on blue collar unionized

Speaker:

workers. Hi, my name is Kay. I'm a member of Canada, Philippines solidarity organization,

Speaker:

CPSO. CPSO is a group of non-Filipinos, primarily, who organize in solidarity with the National

Speaker:

Democratic Revolution in the Philippines, against the semi-colonial and semi-feudal control of

Speaker:

the Philippines by imperialist countries, primarily the United States, but also Canada, Japan,

Speaker:

and China as well. And as you know, the United States happens to be also the biggest supporter

Speaker:

of the Zionist entity. known as Israel. So there's certainly a shared struggle between the Filipino

Speaker:

people and Palestinian people. I'm also a campaign co-chair of the International League of People's

Speaker:

Struggle, ILPS Canada, an alliance of anti-imperialist organizations which CPSO is a member of. I

Speaker:

attended INCA's action as a representative of ILPS. Its objectives align with our ongoing

Speaker:

anti-militarization campaign. and our support for the rights of Palestinians, including their

Speaker:

right to resist the occupation by any means necessary. Definitely want to ask you about

Speaker:

efforts for revolution in the Philippines. But you brought up the Incas protests, so let's

Speaker:

actually start there because when I cast out a net, you folks came in, I needed to talk

Speaker:

to people who had escalated the actions in terms of ending the siege on Gaza. We've seen mass

Speaker:

actions, we've seen sit-ins. We've seen all kinds, but a blockade in front of a weapons

Speaker:

manufacturer here in Toronto, for me, kind of signaled an escalation, a much needed escalation.

Speaker:

And we'd seen similar actions, a lot of them in the United Kingdom. And there were some

Speaker:

really telling images that came from those that I found inspiring. And I think it answers the

Speaker:

call, both for the Palestinian resistance to stop the bombs. We can plead with our politicians,

Speaker:

but in the end they want the bombs to stop falling on them. I think folks can understand why that

Speaker:

particular manufacturer was targeted. But when you say that Action K fit with the ILPS' mandate,

Speaker:

do you want to get into that a little bit more in terms of what led you to that particular

Speaker:

blockade that day? Yeah, so this action was in response to a call from Palestinian workers,

Speaker:

which is a coalition of Palestinian trade unions and community organizations. In their statement,

Speaker:

they say, Palestinian trade unions call on our counterparts internationally and all people

Speaker:

of conscience to end all forms of complicity with Israel's crimes. Most urgently, halting

Speaker:

the arms trade with Israel. as well as all funding and military research. It goes on to list the

Speaker:

demands of these five of them. One is to refuse to build weapons destined for Israel. And second

Speaker:

is to refuse to transport weapons to Israel. And third is to pass motions in their trade

Speaker:

unions to this effect. And four, to take action against complicit companies involved in implementing

Speaker:

Israel's brutal and illegal siege, especially if they have contracts with your institution.

Speaker:

Five. pressure governments to stop all military trade with Israel, and in the case of the US,

Speaker:

funding to it. So I think what's really important in this list of demands is that we have these

Speaker:

institutions in Canada that are either directly responsible or complicit in the enabling of

Speaker:

the genocide in Palestine. We operate under the understanding that Zionism is a product

Speaker:

of imperialism. Like I said previously, it's... The United States is the biggest supporter

Speaker:

of so-called Israel, but Canada is deeply complicit in it, to say the least. Canada is an imperious

Speaker:

country, as Lenin defined it. I'm not going to list them all, the qualifications of what

Speaker:

an imperious country is, but you know, yeah. Yeah, export of capital, right, as opposed

Speaker:

to commodities. Importantly, the dividing up of the world. It's a contest for hegemony and

Speaker:

domination. know, some of the biggest capitalist state. No, we've made that case here on the

Speaker:

show and I think the audience would mostly agree with you. I mean, we use colonial tactics at

Speaker:

home and abroad. Because I think like there's a lot of people that we're encountering in

Speaker:

discussions that don't really, they don't fully understand Canada's complicity. I think because

Speaker:

they can't understand its motivation. But it's because we don't have a real understanding

Speaker:

of our, the level of arms manufacturing that we do here, or the extent that the Canadian

Speaker:

government will act on behalf of capital, right? Everyone's always looking for like the Canadian

Speaker:

reason, like why would Canada back Israel? Like what is the tie there? And why would they do

Speaker:

what we say that they're doing in South America? And it's to facilitate mining, to increase

Speaker:

our arms trade, right? We already, what was it, 2022, $21 million from the Canadian. arms

Speaker:

manufacturers, you know, exported to Israel. I just want to add another number to backup

Speaker:

what Kay is saying when he says that the US is a huge supporter of Israel and their military.

Speaker:

They call it defense spending, but we won't call it that here. We know better. 55% of US

Speaker:

foreign military aid, 55% of all the money that they throw out to armed groups everywhere,

Speaker:

55% of it goes to Israel. I thought that was astonishing. And so when folks ask like, what

Speaker:

role can the West play? Like, what are all these protests doing? What would a Canadian politician

Speaker:

even do? Like, they just can't remove themselves that easily. You know, they're intrinsically

Speaker:

tied. So I appreciate Kay making that point. Yeah, I think like our neighbors, I had my

Speaker:

neighbor just, I come out and he's like, what are we gonna do? What's Canada's role in this?

Speaker:

And I went off, but I felt like there's probably a lot of them out there that just think this

Speaker:

is none of our business, you know, but. It's big business here. I'm going to just hop to

Speaker:

Martin. The Incas protest was a solidarity action, right? It was a bit of an alliance because

Speaker:

I know that the labor for Palestine was also there. Labor against the arms trade was there.

Speaker:

It was a real collection of folks. That's kind of unusual. I think for such a subversive action,

Speaker:

right? It's easy to get everyone to come out to a rally, but it's hard to convince people

Speaker:

to put their name on. something more disruptive than that, something that might get bad press,

Speaker:

might end up in arrests. That's a jump that not everybody's willing to make yet. But what

Speaker:

was it like for your folks getting involved with this and the reasons behind it? Yeah,

Speaker:

thank you. The big three groups organizing this, so far as I could tell, were Labor for Palestine,

Speaker:

Labor Against the Art of Interest Trade, and World Beyond War. The way this was organized

Speaker:

was very like point to point, people who had other people's signal, contact, and who you

Speaker:

knew from actions, getting into touch with each other and seeing who it is we could get out.

Speaker:

Part of I think what made this coalition, what made all these groups come together is the

Speaker:

fact that it was very much the. right up of the action, what it is you were told is like,

Speaker:

you're showing up here. I wasn't told I was told about a week out. I wasn't told it was

Speaker:

an arms factory. But due to the level of secrecy and everything, I figured that's what it was

Speaker:

or something along those lines. But the groups were not advertising themselves very heavily

Speaker:

in that. One can understand that. So you were you were willing to show up, right? Put it

Speaker:

on the line without needing full details. Yeah. Yeah, absolutely. I mean, we all know what's

Speaker:

going on with Israel bombing Gaza relentlessly, genociding, trying to, it seems, liquidate

Speaker:

Gaza. I mean, that has to be stopped. We have to do everything in our power to stop that

Speaker:

here with the massive amount of military aid that Canada gives, as well as other aid. And

Speaker:

Incas is one of many points that is doing that. I approach politics and anti-capitalism with

Speaker:

the understanding to boil it down very heavily that capitalism only cares about money. There's

Speaker:

only so much that begging a politician is going to do if you're not messing up their friend's

Speaker:

money in the background. I mean, I think it's a similar approach we have to take to this

Speaker:

that we have to take to strike action, right? That you have to fuck up their money so bad

Speaker:

that they realize it is not profitable for them to keep doing this stuff. And that is... the

Speaker:

goal and the hope and I think the approach we need to be looking at going forward in trying

Speaker:

to lay out Palestinian solidarity and solidarity with oppressed peoples of the world. Awesome.

Speaker:

We've brought it up a few times. Let's focus on labor's role in all of this, right? So we

Speaker:

see the two of the main groups that organized that blockade against Incas are related to

Speaker:

labor. Kind of, are they official caucuses within the labor or just kind of loosely formed by

Speaker:

interested individuals? I don't know, we should probably have them on here to answer that.

Speaker:

But either way, they're unionized workers that think, and I'm sure you're going to agree with

Speaker:

me, Kay, and them, that labor has a role to play in dismantling the arms trade and fighting

Speaker:

imperialism. Tell me, Kay, you got a call from workers in Palestine to take, you know, they

Speaker:

had clear demands. And one of those was to pass motions within the trade unions, right? To

Speaker:

get... unions officially to take a position on this. Is that doable? Is that work that's

Speaker:

being done? Or is it going to be kind of more of like a wildcat? We're seeing a lot of longshoremen

Speaker:

unions refusing to offload weapons destined for Israel disruptions in that way. Can we

Speaker:

see Canadian Labor Act this way? Well, I echo what the comrades said earlier about really

Speaker:

you got to hit where it hurts the most. for the ruling class, the wallet. It's really essential

Speaker:

strategically and tactically to target these corporations, these arms manufacturers who

Speaker:

are getting rich off the misery and the genocide of not only the Palestinians but oppressed

Speaker:

masses of the world. And at the level of the principle, I echo what Gassan Qanafani said.

Speaker:

He was a poet and writer. and revolutionary activist for the liberation of Palestine, said,

Speaker:

quote, The Palestinian cause is not a cause for Palestinians only, but a cause for every

Speaker:

revolutionary, wherever they are, as a cause of the exploited and oppressed masses in our

Speaker:

era. This remains true today. It has been over half a century since he said this. But this

Speaker:

era he talks about is the era of imperialism and what Lenin called the highest stage of

Speaker:

capitalism. The liberation of Palestine would make a massive contribution to the liberation

Speaker:

of the working class and oppressed people around the world. Mentally or materially? Both, I

Speaker:

would say. I think it would deal a huge blow to the US imperialism and the creation of the

Speaker:

single secular democratic state. for everyone in the Palestine would really, to say the least,

Speaker:

loosen the grip of the US-led Western imperialism in the Middle East, West Asia, but world as

Speaker:

a whole. It's nice to think about, isn't it? Like, just sit on that for a second, because

Speaker:

I felt good to hear we're so caught up right now in saving Gaza that I think envisioning

Speaker:

what... a free Palestine means to the entire world at this point, was kind of hard to think

Speaker:

about until Kay said that. It would have an immense impact, both a positive one and a negative

Speaker:

one on imperialists. So certainly just wanted to sit on that feeling for just a second because

Speaker:

I think a lot of people agree, well, like they're nodding, right? They're going, absolutely.

Speaker:

It's our duty. Yeah. Yeah, I'm there. I want to figure out how you get people to start doing.

Speaker:

Economic disruption. How you pulling people along to get to that point? Because I think

Speaker:

we're sold on its necessity, but There's courage needed right to realize yeah That's it. Yeah,

Speaker:

and this is like one of these pivotal moments in history that if we did secure a victory

Speaker:

such a visible victory it would be Immeasurably, I don't know how to describe it You guys know

Speaker:

what I'm saying like that It's such an important goal right now and it feels like it is within

Speaker:

our reach right even though it looks awful at the moment. We need more people showing up

Speaker:

at facilities like Incas, you know, and there's an Elbit facility in Nova Scotia and probably

Speaker:

a million other ways that we could get workers to use their power to really grind it to a

Speaker:

halt. How do we get there? Yeah. So to bring it back to the working class, right? As I said,

Speaker:

this is a call directly coming from the Palestinian workers. Even though the Palestinian struggle

Speaker:

is struggle for national liberation, right? It concerns not just the working class, but

Speaker:

you know, farmers and bedouins and you know, just the dispossessed people in general, you

Speaker:

know, if you think about Gaza, the employment, youth unemployment rate is close to 70%. It's

Speaker:

a simple definition of the proletariat or the working class doesn't really fit in. So it

Speaker:

is a sort of like an attempt at broader class alliance and building a united front. The Looking

Speaker:

at a long-term perspective on liberation, not just in Palestine, but around the world, the

Speaker:

working class is the vanguard of socialism. They control the means of production, they

Speaker:

create value. It's really important to situate this in a theoretical perspective in order

Speaker:

to understand the importance of this action being carried out right now to target the economics

Speaker:

of imperialism, to the economics of war. How is it integrated? How is the war industry?

Speaker:

you know, arms manufacturer integrated into the workings of imperialism. So on how to get

Speaker:

everyone or get more workers out, get the workers, the organizations of labor involved in it,

Speaker:

we first off, we've seen labor is capable of getting involved, not so much in Canada, as

Speaker:

far as I know, the groups, the labor groups that were involved in this are like, they're

Speaker:

not official or under the protection of the larger labor bodies. These are groups. As far

Speaker:

as I'm aware, mostly of staffers and white collar professionals. So not people on the shop floor

Speaker:

so much, not factory workers or stuff like that, which is where you really need that organization

Speaker:

to hit in order to massively affect these things. Someone from a university can't shut down,

Speaker:

can't go on strike and shut down an arms factory. So a big part of getting this going is getting...

Speaker:

there's understanding these politics to directly to these points, directly to people in factories

Speaker:

that can make that impact. And we've seen that happen in Italy, in Belgium and South Africa.

Speaker:

Belgium, three million workers all encompassed in these massive unions said they are not building

Speaker:

and they are not touching anything going to Israel. Similar in Italy, similar in South

Speaker:

Africa. So it is possible. Now, how it is we get there, I think. The victory for Palestine

Speaker:

is a massive boon for the fight for socialism everywhere. That's a huge part of what keeps

Speaker:

me going. I'm not doing this in charity. I'm not doing this in self-sacrifice. That's involved.

Speaker:

It exists. But I'm doing this in solidarity. I'm doing this because every single blow against

Speaker:

the Canadian imperialist war machine, the NATO imperialist war machine against Israel is a

Speaker:

step towards my own liberation. It's a step towards seeing the friends that I've had since

Speaker:

high school get out of working two jobs. It's a step towards not having my rent and grocery

Speaker:

bill take up, you know, the vast majority of my pay and my life. And I think that's a really

Speaker:

big part of working class politics that a lot of people don't really get at and have a hard

Speaker:

time explaining and seeing. And I think... A large part of that is that they're not necessarily

Speaker:

understanding that. That's why we emphasize, you know, theory and reading so much. Your

Speaker:

brain tells your body what to do. I saw the transition happening. So you're talking about

Speaker:

bringing the knowledge and the politics to the shop floor. I know that you are part of the

Speaker:

communist worker circle reading group. And, you know, we go from blockading weapons manufacturers

Speaker:

to talking about a reading group. Some may think like these are not the same tactics and it's

Speaker:

all part of the same. class war, right? It is part of how you get there. And I think and

Speaker:

I know you know this. I know, you know, people look at Marxist reading groups and roll their

Speaker:

eyes and have some critiques around the accessibility of learning theory. So I'm going to give you

Speaker:

some space to yeah. Oh, yeah, don't you worry. I wouldn't throw something like that and not

Speaker:

let you say but take a moment to kind of talk about the importance of doing the educating

Speaker:

together, you know collectively. So we'll let Kay hit on this as well, because I'm sure part

Speaker:

of the internationalist movement is convincing people it needs to be an internationalist movement

Speaker:

and beyond, right? A lot of people are even afraid of the word revolution. So let me let

Speaker:

you defend your reading group first, because I kind of, you know, threw all that trash that

Speaker:

people probably throw on you. And I'm sure you've heard it. Oh, absolutely. Absolutely. Yeah.

Speaker:

I mean, I completely agree. I did not expect that. That's... My time as a communist has

Speaker:

not been very long now. I got into it, I was introduced to it in the last round of my union

Speaker:

bargaining, and have gotten more and more involved and more studied and active over the time.

Speaker:

So this was like four years ago now. And the first few reading groups I joined really sucked.

Speaker:

It was very much a go read this on your own. and then come back with questions. And then

Speaker:

there's my ADHD blue collar self, eyes crossed staring at this book, trying to not like run

Speaker:

away from it. You need to study buddy. Yeah, well, and this is an issue that a lot of blue

Speaker:

collar workers have. We are used to working with our hands and we are very much kept away

Speaker:

from academics or reading or anything like that. Like I finished high school, I didn't go back

Speaker:

to a book. At that time, it had been two, three years since I'd picked up a book. And so the

Speaker:

approach we have in the Common Worker Circle, the CWC, is we read out loud and we discuss

Speaker:

as we go. It's slow, but as long as you're doing it consistently and you're talking with people,

Speaker:

like you get through it, you get through a lot of reading. The books we're reading, like these

Speaker:

are dense, dense books. So if you're staying consistent with them, you can actually get

Speaker:

through a whole lot of theory with that very quickly. The other thing it really does, which

Speaker:

can be a bit of an issue with like an academic approach to this study, is it keeps us from

Speaker:

kind of learning this stuff in like hundred year old English, or an academic language or

Speaker:

stuff like that. I like to say we learn at one time. in the language of Marx and then we learn

Speaker:

it another time in the language of the proletariat. I like that. And that's the over the course

Speaker:

of discussion, right? So that you can bring it to the workplace, you can bring it to conversations

Speaker:

at the bar, you can bring it to wherever it is you're at and it doesn't sound or feel alien

Speaker:

to the workers. Like you're trying to indoctrinate people. Yeah, exactly. Yeah, and there's like,

Speaker:

there's levels to that, like as you become more accustomed to someone, you don't want to...

Speaker:

like it's never about dumbing it down or anything like that. We trust the working class to be

Speaker:

able to understand this stuff, to be able to take on, you know, a new word here and there

Speaker:

or whatever. Because people inherently feel it, right? Sometimes they just need the words

Speaker:

to explain it, but even when you talk to, you know, your conservative neighbor about issues,

Speaker:

like they feel oppressed, like they talk, they just don't know where to punch. Sometimes,

Speaker:

right? They've been taught to punch down and you know, you got to kind of redirect them

Speaker:

but They they do feel oppressed as workers all of them. Yep. Yes, I can see how people quickly

Speaker:

Come along once You know, they have the theory I paid for my education like I went to political

Speaker:

science is my degree. So I guess we could call those reading circles of sorts, you know, that

Speaker:

isn't accessible for everybody I think a lot of people get frustrated especially when we

Speaker:

talk about the labor movement and why they're not more progressive as a whole, right? As

Speaker:

though it's like some leftist group and not just a representation of a portion of the working

Speaker:

class, right? And so how to bring their politics along is a part of a lot of the discussions,

Speaker:

right? And how we get a general strike when we need it. How do we get more militant leaders

Speaker:

to the top of unions who understand what their role is, what their role is supposed to be,

Speaker:

right? And a lot of that has to do with getting people that political education that they no

Speaker:

longer get. I'll PS in general, but particularly at CPSO, you know, we take political education

Speaker:

very seriously. You know, we sort of inherit that tradition of the revolutionary movement

Speaker:

in the Philippines. Where we do this thing called Eds, which stands for educational discussions.

Speaker:

There are certain texts that all members of the organization have to go through. You know,

Speaker:

read and discuss. One of them is Philippine society and revolution. The Philippines through

Speaker:

a Marxist perspective, how the country developed and how it became colonized, forced by Spain,

Speaker:

the United States, and Japan, back to the United States, and how that revolutionary movement

Speaker:

developed. In response to that, you know, with the desire to create a new society, liberated

Speaker:

Philippines, moving towards socials. And another text is called Araring Activista. In Tagalog,

Speaker:

it means activist studies. It's more a practical text. It's more about organization. It's about

Speaker:

democratic centralism, just the Marxist method of leadership, combining democracy and centralized

Speaker:

leadership, a community system. So this is where we discuss more of what it means to be an activist,

Speaker:

how we should organize, how we should advance the revolution, how do we work with the masses,

Speaker:

and things like that. These are really important we go through. And we also do other like EDs

Speaker:

that are, you know, cater to particular topics like migrant workers, peasants and what have

Speaker:

you, right? So that's the sort of tradition I come out of. And I'm quite proud of that

Speaker:

and really clarified how I think about activism and organizing in general. And another point

Speaker:

that I want to make is that, you know, we've been talking about theory and practice, you

Speaker:

know, how do we synthesize them? How do we, you know, have a clear understanding of its

Speaker:

interrelation, their interrelation. And I just want to say that the practice itself can be

Speaker:

educational. So talking about this particular action, right? Learning on the line, you mean?

Speaker:

Yes, exactly. Putting the boots on the ground and what have you. So this action, like other

Speaker:

actions that I participated in the past, disrupting business as usual really exposes the contradictions

Speaker:

of capitalism, imperialism, and settler colonialism. that are usually hidden under the facade of

Speaker:

normals, these actions really explore them out in the open. At this action, we saw an unhinged

Speaker:

anger of Inca employees and executives. And Fuo happened to be like hardcore pro-Zionist,

Speaker:

terrorizing us, terrorizing the protesters, snatching and destroying our signs and banners.

Speaker:

They actually took our ILPS banner and ripped it apart. And they did that to other... cameras

Speaker:

there as well and lots of pushing and shoving. Not to mention that they all were protected

Speaker:

and escorted by the armed agents of the state, the Toronto police. Despite all the violence

Speaker:

that these Zionists committed against us, it was us, seven of us who got arrested. None

Speaker:

of them, for all the pushing and shoving, none of them got arrested. So obviously don't have

Speaker:

to lecture you about this complicity of the police. Yeah, it was really out in the open.

Speaker:

really exposed it and it was, I think, a big learning moment for all of us. And in a way,

Speaker:

really reenacted the violence Palestinians experience every day inside so-called Israel and the occupied

Speaker:

territories. It's a bit of an exaggeration, I admit, but it does really kind of, to quote

Speaker:

this old slogan by the Weather Underground, you know, bringing the war home, like bringing

Speaker:

the occupation of Palestine back to Canada. Actions like this are hugely educational. It

Speaker:

definitely was educational for me. And yeah, there's a lot we can learn from it. So I think

Speaker:

you've demonstrated, and I know before we started recording, Martin spoke of his experience at

Speaker:

Victoria Park Collegiate protest, counter protest to protect trans youth and had similar reaction

Speaker:

from protesters antagonizing and being protected by police. and then the arrests being one sided.

Speaker:

So certainly anybody who goes to these actions and lives and experiences this, you know, the

Speaker:

mask is gone, right? Quickly, you understand what police are actually there for when you

Speaker:

do experience. I totally understand what you're talking about, but it drives home the point

Speaker:

there that although escalated tactics are needed, community defense actions are needed, they

Speaker:

aren't without risk. because you are going up against an incredible machine, right? And they

Speaker:

all work and connected with one another. And it surprises me the employees that workers

Speaker:

felt the need to do that, you know, like they just had no class consciousness whatsoever.

Speaker:

I mean, it does surprise me and it doesn't but obviously the police responses a surprise me

Speaker:

at all. How do you prepare like let's get a little practical. How do you prepare people

Speaker:

going into these actions? Right? To stay as safe as possible or... It's a tough one, right?

Speaker:

Because when you put that call out, you are asking a lot of people. So I think there is,

Speaker:

as an organizer, I would think it would be an inherent responsibility of mine to at least

Speaker:

adequately prepare them. I know some legal fund solidarity actions are necessary, but I'm talking

Speaker:

about like before the fact. So do either of you have any kind of tips for people? going

Speaker:

to actions that are going to be met with resistance. I mean, all of our actions are kind of now

Speaker:

being met with resistance, but I mean police force, right? So anytime a railway is blocked,

Speaker:

anytime real economic stops are put in, injunctions surely follow and then police action. So Martin.

Speaker:

So I think first and foremost, no one there... Even at the point of getting contacted, no

Speaker:

one there was new to this. I recognize a great number of the faces from previous actions and

Speaker:

this, that, and the other thing. Everyone had the experience to be there. And that was part

Speaker:

of that approach to organizing of going point-to-point. You have to go in with the understanding, you

Speaker:

have to tell people that there's the possibility you get arrested. There is the possibility

Speaker:

that stuff gets violent. This protest was... in some way, the use of cars. So there are

Speaker:

two lines. I was at one that was more involved in blocking cars at the front. I've blocked

Speaker:

a lot of cars in my time. These guys were putting the cars into the line. I have never had a

Speaker:

car make contact with me. It happened three times on this line, as well as one time where

Speaker:

a car sped by so quick within a half meter of one of the... protestors and swerved up onto

Speaker:

the side of the road right next to our lines in front of a police in front of the police.

Speaker:

I also wanted to say I don't as any military office and also in case in Canada does a lot

Speaker:

of like moving money. They have massive armored vehicles, they go pick up ATMs and stuff. They

Speaker:

have a massive security force there, as you'd expect from what I saw the workers that I saw.

Speaker:

that were aggressive. But from what I saw, the workers were sitting across the street. Like,

Speaker:

that's weird, eh? They were not the aggressive ones. It was managers. It was security. It

Speaker:

was lead hands who were really attacking our lives. I was going to say, I won't lie, like

Speaker:

as a worker, if I showed up and there was a picket line across the gate to get in, I'd

Speaker:

be kind of stoked. Right. Like, I mean, that's my personal bias. But yeah, playing into that.

Speaker:

And to your point, though, Martin. You want to bring people along though, right? So yes,

Speaker:

definitely warn people that they're going to be arrested. Having access to someone willing

Speaker:

to act as a legal representative is also kind of critical work to do ahead of time. I'll

Speaker:

warn folks, I mean, back in the day when we used to organize, I mean, like back in G20

Speaker:

days, we would write the number of legal aid on our arm. We now know better not to do that.

Speaker:

you need to memorize a phone number or write it somewhere inconspicuous because police will

Speaker:

use that to target you. But yes, mentally preparing people is important and training people, even

Speaker:

if you feel like they're prepared. But I understand like there's some actions like this where you

Speaker:

really just got to find some trusted individuals. And I think that's quite how the coordinated

Speaker:

sit-ins worked. across Canada, a lot of people are like, why didn't I know about this? I wanted

Speaker:

to do it. And the reality is, is you gotta make sure those are absolutely trusted comrades

Speaker:

that understand the risk and have a modicum of understanding on how to react in those situations,

Speaker:

right? But it is, like if you wanna pull people along, we've gotta make sure like they, they're

Speaker:

not just fired up because they know, but they feel like they're equipped as well. You can't

Speaker:

prepare yourself for anything, but. hearing about the violence on the lines. That has just

Speaker:

been an increasing trend. And then the other big thing is making sure that there's a clear

Speaker:

defined leadership on the lines or in the action, who when you don't know what's going on, what

Speaker:

it is you're supposed to be doing, that you can turn to and, you know, ask what's up. Again,

Speaker:

in the Inca's action, that was the... There were two picket captains we were all instructed

Speaker:

to go to. And that is huge for making it possible for new people to join up. Find that person

Speaker:

with a tattered up flag when things get, get heavy. Find the person with, you know, busted

Speaker:

boots. You know, the type who's been marching and ask them what's up. Well. They usually,

Speaker:

they should be wearing a reflective vest if they know their shit, right? At least. The

Speaker:

bottom line is that there's no like 100% safety, right? Like there's no risk-proof protest action.

Speaker:

I think of what Mao said, revolution is not a dinner party, right? There's always going

Speaker:

to be risk. There's always going to be a risk of arrest, doxing, and what have you. And you

Speaker:

know, certain actions have definitely increased the risk than others. So I think that's the

Speaker:

bottom line. So, you know, it shouldn't really let us paralyze and not do anything. The stake

Speaker:

is really high. However, you know, there are precautions we can take to, you know, to quote

Speaker:

the often used slogan, you know, we keep each other safe. That's the name of our first episode.

Speaker:

Oh, okay. You know, go in groups, don't go alone, you know, especially to actions like this,

Speaker:

right? Have a signal chat. communicate, and have a rendezvous spot, discuss what the plans

Speaker:

are. You know, the recent rallies and marches that I went with my comrades, you know, we

Speaker:

first we gather in a big group and form a like a buddy system, smaller groups, and you know,

Speaker:

we stay together, you know, don't leave each other, don't wander out, just stick together.

Speaker:

You know, it really requires an organization and a collective effort to ensure the security

Speaker:

of your comrades. Yeah, that's what I recommend to do in addition to what you and Martin said

Speaker:

already. Yeah, I will definitely link in the show notes some of our you know, the infographics

Speaker:

that folks have put together for you know, basic safety at protests. I want to go back to something

Speaker:

Kay said at the beginning of the interview, because like I said, I think a lot of people

Speaker:

are sold on the need to escalate actions, right? They've been to a few marches.

Speaker:

The weapons flow has not stopped. And Kay, you mentioned the need to resist by any means necessary.

Speaker:

You can't drop something like that without me giving you the space to explain that. I feel

Speaker:

like I know what you mean. And I feel a lot of people, and we've talked about it on the

Speaker:

show, for people not to shy away from Palestinian right to armed resistance. as part of capitulating

Speaker:

in this moment, as part of just trying to get more people along for the ceasefire. And the

Speaker:

demands to disarm Hamas would be to remove all matter of defense from Palestinians in Gaza.

Speaker:

So we're friends on this front, right? You're not going to find me arguing with you on that

Speaker:

point. But what people are going to hear sometimes, right, is what... has been weaponized against

Speaker:

the left in recent days and weeks, particularly, you know, Fred Hahn has a good high profile

Speaker:

example of then almost being accused of celebrating the most horrific acts of an armed group, any

Speaker:

armed group. Right. And so that makes bringing people along difficult. Right. This the narrative

Speaker:

that's going around Palestinian resistance, right? You've heard it, you've felt it, right?

Speaker:

So it's an uncomfortable place to be right now to assert that point. So expand on it a little

Speaker:

bit. I think it's really important to know, especially now with the barrage of propaganda

Speaker:

coming from the Zionist state and its allies, imperialist allies, media wing. Hamas is only

Speaker:

one organization among others who are resisting the occupation. There are other organizations

Speaker:

that are more secular or even some of them are even more conservative than Hamas. So we have

Speaker:

Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine, Democratic Front for the Liberation of Palestine,

Speaker:

and Islamic Jihad and many others. The Palestinian resistance is a united front. It's a national

Speaker:

united front. They may have some disagreements at the level of ideology, but they all agree

Speaker:

on resisting it. the occupation and the genocide by any means necessary. You know, obviously

Speaker:

by any means necessary goes both ways, right? We all know that there is a variety of tactics

Speaker:

employed to politically isolate the Zionist entity. The point is to make them look unreasonable,

Speaker:

to put it mildly, and you know, they're the ones who are doing aggression. It's becoming

Speaker:

clear and clear every day that they're breaking all international law you can think of. You

Speaker:

know, anyone with any sense of humanitarian conscience would... object to it. But we also

Speaker:

at the same time have to acknowledge that these resistance organizations are at the forefront

Speaker:

of the resistance. You know, there is a telegram channel called Resistance News Network, where

Speaker:

they update every tactical operation. Statements coming out of the political bureau, it's all

Speaker:

there. It's basically my phone has been ringing nonstop. These nonstop notifications coming

Speaker:

from... So if folks haven't subscribed to it, I recommend, highly recommend. signing up to

Speaker:

it. But yeah, these are the people we should be listening to because they're on the front

Speaker:

line. You know, we hear a lot about ceasefire, but at this point, none of these organizations

Speaker:

are endorsing ceasefire. So, you know, which makes sense because, you know, ceasefire implies

Speaker:

there are two belligerent parties involved in armed conflict, which is true to a certain

Speaker:

extent, but it's not that the power dynamic is completely disproportionate. There's only

Speaker:

one side that is committing genocide. You know, there's only one side that are killing thousands

Speaker:

and thousands of children, you know, and they even call it like mowing the grass, right?

Speaker:

Like it's, it's fascism plain and simple. It doesn't really make any sense at this point

Speaker:

to, to ask the resistance to stop firing. We need to demand, stop the bombings of Gaza,

Speaker:

right? Stop the massacres, stop the genocide. I want to just develop on that point for a

Speaker:

second, because that's going to be hard for people to hear, right? Because that's the like

Speaker:

one message you've been able to get liberals, some liberals to utter. And it's like, this

Speaker:

point, right? This like, if we could just get them to demand a ceasefire, you know, they're

Speaker:

good, right? That's all we need Biden to do. One, we shouldn't be celebrating such a small,

Speaker:

small gesture in terms of ending the occupation, but it's that issue of ceasefire or no ceasefire.

Speaker:

Because one would think there is only one call, right? Like it does seem pretty united here

Speaker:

in the West that folks are demanding a ceasefire. But what they're actually asking is for the

Speaker:

bombs to stop dropping on their heads. And folks need to remember in the sense of the occupation,

Speaker:

that's not over. And we still assert that there's the are they have a right to resist the occupation

Speaker:

with arms, with violence. I'm not going to get into what kind of violence that it's an illegal

Speaker:

occupation. They can resist it. If a ceasefire is called the bombs may stop dropping on Gaza,

Speaker:

but the resistance still needs to remain. So what do they do? They will be in violation

Speaker:

of a ceasefire when they start to resist again, when they need to resist again, right? Because

Speaker:

they're gonna need to resist again. They're still under occupation. Life is not going to

Speaker:

get better in Gaza, especially now, right? So the need for a free Palestine has never even

Speaker:

been more important. So there's no way you can turn to this network, right? So thank you for

Speaker:

making that very important point that it's not just Hamas, that it is a coalition of people

Speaker:

of all ideological, because that uses a gotcha. They're very conservative. How can you be backing

Speaker:

Hamas and their resistance and whatnot? We're backing a Palestinian collective resistance

Speaker:

that is determined by Palestinians. And so I understand a ceasefire. This is me like pleading

Speaker:

with the audience because I know that my guests understand. Yes, a ceasefire. Yes, we want

Speaker:

what is happening in Gaza to stop. But you have to understand the importance of K making that

Speaker:

point of how that frames the entire conflict then. Everyone's always searching for a word,

Speaker:

like conflict doesn't seem adequate. It's not a war, right? So a ceasefire technically isn't

Speaker:

the term, but it would really hamper the ability for Palestinians to resist after that. And

Speaker:

it would only take the smallest fucking excuse from Israel to say that the ceasefire had been

Speaker:

broken and then, and then whatever they do would be justified fully, right? Cause it would be

Speaker:

like, they broke the ceasefire. We finally agreed to that. We were reasonable. They would come

Speaker:

off looking reasonable. and they would be able to continue their erasure of Gaza after that.

Speaker:

Because the armed resistance will not stop. Even if some leaders get into a room and sign

Speaker:

ceasefire papers, or if that's how it fucking happens, I don't even know these days, right?

Speaker:

You know, that won't matter to the people of Palestine who are losing their land in the

Speaker:

West Bank and are continually confined in Gaza. Especially now you've got to picture Gaza,

Speaker:

it's cut in half. Israel's bragged this morning about cutting it in half. So they won't ever

Speaker:

relent that line. you are going to have a north and south Gaza if they even let Palestinians

Speaker:

back in the north. And so surely, surely armed resistance will be necessary. I didn't know

Speaker:

if we'd get around to that point. We've kind of been tossing it around on the show, but

Speaker:

Kay you really set us up to kind of get at that. And again, it's one of those, another uncomfortable

Speaker:

spots because we feel like we're building on ceasefire language, right? We're trying to

Speaker:

get everyone to come to that point, but that point isn't enough. Right. Linda Sarsour, she

Speaker:

had a great speech that I screen recorded because, you know, it did something for me there. But

Speaker:

she's like, after the park, you know, after the ceasefire, you cannot turn your back on

Speaker:

us. We are still here. We are still resisting. Like, this is not that is not over. Yeah, I've

Speaker:

been grappling with that myself. So I appreciate you bringing it up. OK, Martin, you've had

Speaker:

your head up for so long. I feel bad. But I needed to let go on that. No, absolutely. That's

Speaker:

I mean, I think that's. The ceasefire demand in the West is the biggest political question

Speaker:

we have right now. And I think figuring that out is integral to developing harder tactics

Speaker:

and to solidifying resistance here. I wanted to come in with a quote first off by Walter

Speaker:

Rodney, who's an Afro-Guyanese revolutionary. But what standard of morality can the violence

Speaker:

used by a slave to break his chains? be considered the same as the violence of a slave master.

Speaker:

I think that's a really important way to approach this, a way to consider the whole situation.

Speaker:

I have been skeptical and I'm now pretty solidly opposed to the ceasefire demand. I think that

Speaker:

is a both sides argument and a both sides position. Encased in the idea of a ceasefire is Palestinians

Speaker:

dropping their guns. There are situations in which a ceasefire is necessary and correct.

Speaker:

I'm for stopping the bombs on Gaza. I am for beating Israel here at home, cutting off their

Speaker:

military support, but an internationally mandated, a UN mandated or agreed upon ceasefire. I don't

Speaker:

think it makes sense in the current time. So like a ceasefire, it's not this ideological

Speaker:

thing, everyone comes, shakes hands, it's cool. It's usually put in place or agreed upon that

Speaker:

there's a protectorate. put in place here? Who's going to be the protector of Palestine in the

Speaker:

world today? Who is it that the US is going to agree to, to allow to be the protector and

Speaker:

the Palestinians to agree to be the protector? You have historically, you have a couple different

Speaker:

Arab nations coming in to be the protector of Palestine. And then not caring as Israel goes

Speaker:

and takes it on. And also who is it that has the military power to face this massive military

Speaker:

base in the West. Like the people who maybe are separate enough in this, that aren't pro-US

Speaker:

enough in this, are never going to be allowed to be the arbiter of the ceasefire. So it's

Speaker:

going to be Palestine relying on people who have funded their genocide. And I think that's

Speaker:

really a... I don't think that can happen functionally. We also know, we've all known about Palestine.

Speaker:

and research Palestine in this last little bit, enough to know exactly what you were saying.

Speaker:

Whatever, Israel is not gonna stop. There have been lines drawn on the map and Israel has

Speaker:

always pushed forward beyond them. The state of Israel is going to continue to take out

Speaker:

Palestine. And if it's not the state actively doing it, they're endorsing settlers to do

Speaker:

it. What's gonna happen in a ceasefire is that settlers are going to continue to attack. There's

Speaker:

going to be occasional bombings. It's gonna... revert to what it was last year, where there's

Speaker:

only a few hundred Palestinians dying constantly and a few hundred getting taken to prison camps

Speaker:

instead of the thousands a day. But then once the next October 7th happens, once the next

Speaker:

time a olive farmer shoots back because there's a hundred Israeli settlers coming at their

Speaker:

house, it's going to be Hamas attacked civilians. It's going to be Palestine broke the ceasefire.

Speaker:

attacking civilians. And it's going to return exactly to where it is today, if not more so

Speaker:

because we have to remember that on October 7th, Israel was the weakest militarily it has

Speaker:

been in a very long time. And after that reminder, everyone in the West who supports Israel has

Speaker:

been pumping money in to Israel. So over the course of the ceasefire, over the course of

Speaker:

whatever that is, Israel is going to remilitarize, get stronger, and the possibilities for effective

Speaker:

resistance are going to become smaller and smaller. So if we're talking freeing Palestine and we're

Speaker:

talking supporting the resistance, I understand where it comes from. You see the atrocities

Speaker:

being committed and you need it to stop. I don't think a lot of people understand that ceasefire

Speaker:

means both sides drop the guns. We see it and we say we want our guns to stop. And I'm for

Speaker:

that. Yes, the common narrative is very frustrating to me that Hamas must disarm, but we wouldn't

Speaker:

even fathom asking that of Israel, despite the differential in casualties, civilian casualties.

Speaker:

Like it's state sanctioned violence only, right? Everyone swallows it, even though, you know,

Speaker:

anybody who has stepped back and looked at it, we throw our hands up in the air and go, Are

Speaker:

you guys serious? Can you not see the hypocrisy? But you know, we're so trained to only see

Speaker:

state violence as the only legitimate violence, right? And everyone else is a terrorist. Even

Speaker:

folks that should know better still kind of swallow that line whole, but we're eating away

Speaker:

at it bit by bit. But Martin brought us kind of full circle again to, yes, that is a good

Speaker:

point. Israel will likely be more armed after this because we've seen pledges of support

Speaker:

and billions more going. I just kind of scoffed when you said that though, like when they were

Speaker:

at their weakest. I'm like, well, they spend 12% of their budget on the military. They spend

Speaker:

more per capita on their military than anywhere else. They're kind of close to South Korea,

Speaker:

but still not even close. per capita, not even close to Russia. And they need help. So full

Speaker:

circle, we're back to cutting off the weapons supply for everyone. Well, going back to our

Speaker:

politicians over and over again for every kind of incremental change perhaps isn't the answer,

Speaker:

but a more internationalist movement like the ILPS and other internationalists propose. But

Speaker:

do you wanna kind of, where do we go from here? comment. You don't have to tell me what's going

Speaker:

on in your signal chat, or you can, if there's any. But where do folks go? Pan National Day

Speaker:

of Action is planned for November 12th. That's still six days away from the day that we're

Speaker:

recording this. Where do we go in terms of really disrupting imperialism and more specifically

Speaker:

the arms trade? Yeah, I just wanted to sort of add to what the comrade said earlier. There's

Speaker:

a saying in the... National Democratic Movement in the Philippines. The key is to be firm in

Speaker:

principle, but flexible in tactic. There's a lot of similarities between the Palestinian

Speaker:

resistance and the National Democratic Movement, namely that there are two aspects to the movement.

Speaker:

In the Philippines, the movement divides into legal mass movement, represented by various

Speaker:

mass organizations like Bayan Philippines, Anak Bayan, and Gabriela, and there are many, many

Speaker:

other organizations that represent particular sectors of Philippine society. These are the

Speaker:

legitimate mass organizations that relate directly to the masses, mostly in the cities. And there

Speaker:

is another aspect to it, which is an underground armed struggle led by the Communist Party of

Speaker:

the Philippines, New People's Army, which is an armed mass organization of the guerrilla

Speaker:

army of the movement. And there's also the National Democratic Front of the Philippines. So these

Speaker:

three organizations constitute a sort of triangle of the underground revolutionary movement.

Speaker:

And all three are outlawed. They're illegal in the Philippines, of course, in other countries

Speaker:

as well. I can only imagine the penalty would be stiff. Philippines is known for quite the

Speaker:

law and order approach. They use scare quotes there. Yeah. So we have the son of Marcus,

Speaker:

you know, Felde and the Marcus, Junior. He is the, you know, the Marcus dynasty is back in

Speaker:

power. Also, you know, together with the daughter of Rodrigo de Tiltes, who was notorious for

Speaker:

killing people left and right. Just, you know, take, you know, quote unquote, cleaning up

Speaker:

drug addicts from the streets, criminalizing activists, you know. being a rabid anti-communist,

Speaker:

just to name a few, right? But that's throughout the history. These are the puppet regimes of

Speaker:

imperialism, the US, Canada, and other states. My point is that these three, the underground

Speaker:

component is the primary field of struggle. They are the vanguard of the revolution. What

Speaker:

the legal mass movement does is to highlight the root cause. A lot of Filipinos people prefer

Speaker:

that there is no armed conflict. They prefer that there is justice, right? There's no peace

Speaker:

without justice. The objective of the legal mass movement is to highlight the underlying

Speaker:

issues, underlying relations of exploitation and oppression created by imperialism, the

Speaker:

root cause of the armed struggle. In a word, to highlight the legitimacy of the armed struggle.

Speaker:

It is a just struggle for liberation and for socialism. That's what is needed to bring justice

Speaker:

to Filipino people. So there's two aspects of it. The idea is to politically isolate the

Speaker:

Philippine state, you know, make them look very unreasonable and very, they are the ones that

Speaker:

for committing all the injustice. They're the PR firm of the movement. Yeah. They're getting

Speaker:

the talking points out and politically positioning the movement. Yes? Yeah, not necessarily, yeah,

Speaker:

PR, but like, they do the concrete. mass organizing with the working class and dispossessed masses,

Speaker:

peasants also, women, youth, many others. So they're not simply doing PR, but they're two

Speaker:

components of the movement. Even though they're separate, they represent their strive for the

Speaker:

same goal, the liberation of the Philippines from imperialism, semi-feudalism. and bureaucratic

Speaker:

capitalism. The third one is kind of like a very corrupt form of capitalism, represented

Speaker:

by the very close tie between government officials and bureaucrats with the private farms and

Speaker:

landed estates, you know, still operates with the mechanism inherited from the era of Spanish

Speaker:

colonialism, like hachiendas and plantations and what have you, right? Bringing it back

Speaker:

to the Palestinian resistance, I think there's a similar dynamic at play here. There's armed

Speaker:

resistance. is the forefront of the struggle. But there's various other organizations like

Speaker:

Palestinian workers, right, that they're just putting out the call, that they're, you know,

Speaker:

they're different in tactics, but they're striving for the same goal. One notable difference is

Speaker:

that the Philippines is semi-colonial and Palestine is colonial. It's directly occupied by hostile

Speaker:

colonial power, whereas the Philippines is formally independent, you know. I know when you say

Speaker:

semi, it means to me it sounds like half, but it's just like, it's really appearances sake,

Speaker:

right? It's a formality. Exactly. Precisely. Because in the material life of a Philippine

Speaker:

worker, it's colonial. The difference notwithstanding, there's a, you know, the similarity in tactics

Speaker:

and strategy that these two movements employ. And I think our job here in the Imperial Corps

Speaker:

is in the legal sphere, educate the people about the legitimacy. of the armed struggle, right?

Speaker:

If we don't want Hamas and other resistance organizations to exist, the state of Israel

Speaker:

has to dissolve and become a one democratic secular state for everyone, you know, whether

Speaker:

Jewish, Arabs, Palestinians, similar in the Philippines. If you don't want this armed conflict

Speaker:

to exist, this semi-feudal, semi-colonial system has to dissolve. And Philippines have to be...

Speaker:

genuinely democratic. It has to be liberated from the imperialism first so it can move towards

Speaker:

social. So yeah, the point is to basically, our job is to educate people about the right

Speaker:

of armed struggle. The resistance is just and must be supported and we have to really nail

Speaker:

that point to everybody. So in terms of moving forward, where do we go from here? So IOPs

Speaker:

has an active anti-war campaign, anti-militarization campaign, around three... One is three point

Speaker:

demands. One is Canada out of NATO. Second is to stop the technical port for reactionary

Speaker:

regimes, including the Zionist regime, the Philippine state, and Saudi, Saudi Arabia. Do you guys

Speaker:

have a list? The list goes on. It's a lot. Yeah, no, I'm like, I imagine that's a long list.

Speaker:

There's like 196 countries. It's probably like 160 of them. And third demand is the stop the

Speaker:

arms trade. So this is what drove me to this action, right? It's consistent with the campaign.

Speaker:

And actually we co-organized the Kancuk protests in Ottawa in late May with Warp Beyond War.

Speaker:

It was ILPS Canada and Warp Beyond War that put on the protests. It happens every year.

Speaker:

It's been going on for decades actually. It was also very educational. Like I said earlier,

Speaker:

it was, you know, we confronted a lot of these people in suits just walking into the venue

Speaker:

of some of the biggest. arms trade show in the world. You know, the police was violent towards

Speaker:

us. They were escorted and protected by the police. Same thing. That was part of our campaign

Speaker:

as well. And we work with various other organizations who don't necessarily share our politics to

Speaker:

oppose, you know, to put forward these demands and, you know, really fighting imperialism

Speaker:

in the belly of the beast. And yeah, November 8th is the International Day of Action Against

Speaker:

Arms Companies, Weapons Companies. profiting from the genocide in Palestine. There are actions

Speaker:

planned all over North America and beyond. ILPS Canada is responding to this call by the resist

Speaker:

US-led war movements. So they're the initiator of the Day of Action. So it's actually days

Speaker:

of action. There are also actions planned on the 9th as well. But you know, this struggle

Speaker:

is obviously continuing beyond these two days. So yeah, if you're interested in learning more

Speaker:

about ILPS, if your organization is interested, IOPs is an alliance of organizations. So if

Speaker:

your organization's interested, find us on social media. We're on both Instagram and Facebook.

Speaker:

Don't worry about dropping that. I will make sure everyone is linked back to both of your

Speaker:

work and your organizations so that they can learn more about you, but also perhaps get

Speaker:

involved in what you're doing. Yeah, on my end, we've... focused more so on labor work, organizing

Speaker:

within labor. Labor's response to this has been sad. Most of labor seems more, has put more

Speaker:

effort into beating down Fred Hahn for not criticizing Hamas first, foremost, and above everything

Speaker:

than it has doing anything to help Palestinians or even being pacifists and taking both sides.

Speaker:

Functionally, they have taken a pro-Israeli stance. And that's despite the vast number

Speaker:

of trade unionists I know, and like going to marches, I'm seeing a lot of union hats, I'm

Speaker:

seeing a lot of union jackets, but no union flags, because people and trade unionists are

Speaker:

scared about the repercussions that we're going to receive from our unions for not backing

Speaker:

the Canadian imperialist government. That is pathetic because it's the same Canadian imperialist

Speaker:

government that votes us back to work and break strikes. It's the same imperialist government

Speaker:

that's been promising things to workers for generations now and has never done any of that,

Speaker:

regardless of what party it is. Orange, red or blue, doesn't matter who. That's a t-shirt.

Speaker:

And we need to get through that. The workers... The Palestinian youth movement of North America

Speaker:

is right now the biggest mobilizer of workers that is out there, despite the unions not being

Speaker:

on board with it. And so breaking through that, I think it's twofold. It's the political, it's

Speaker:

getting over, because I think the unions see the peacefire demand for exactly what it is.

Speaker:

And they're using that. It's a both sides argument. It's a both sides position. And when you're

Speaker:

for both sides, or when you oppose both sides equally, And why do you do anything? So getting

Speaker:

over that politically, I think is a massive importance. And then it's also building enough

Speaker:

power from the base from not trying to rush through and go to the OFL or CUPI national,

Speaker:

but from your local, from your building that you work at and demanding, or even just taking

Speaker:

flags from a steward and showing up to these marches, not as individuals. but as part of

Speaker:

a collection of workers, as part of a union, and demonstrating to, you know, the politicians

Speaker:

of labor who think or who understand really at this point that if they step up, they're

Speaker:

kind of going to be alone. They're not going to have the support because they don't see

Speaker:

that support. So building from the base, showing that if you stand up to Israel, if you stand

Speaker:

up for Palestine, that you're... not going to be thrown out of the House of Labour because

Speaker:

we have so many people that have your back and that's the way we have to build in labour.

Speaker:

That's how we're going to get to the point of forcing the OFL to say, no, we're not moving

Speaker:

any arms for Israel. We're not building any arms for Israel. That's how we're going to

Speaker:

get to the point of not a few hour long picket, but having picket lines set up at Incas every

Speaker:

single second of every single day. until Palestine is free. That's how we're going to get to the

Speaker:

point of really taking out the war machine that is Canada. So that's the goal. Slowly but surely,

Speaker:

I've gotten two, three co-workers out to Palestine marches. So long way to go. But that's the,

Speaker:

I mean, I think that's the next step for escalation on the labor front. Yes, Martin. Please remember,

Speaker:

it's not your job to bring everybody along. So those are victories when you bring people

Speaker:

along. that personal work, that local work is often a lot harder, right? It's more intimate

Speaker:

and it does require that kind of heavy lifting that you have to do sometimes. Discussions,

Speaker:

hard discussions. Again, I hope our audience is a little bit better equipped to have some

Speaker:

of those discussions with people because they've heard from the both of you. I thank you very

Speaker:

much for coming on the show and for the work that you do on the ground. I feel like we could

Speaker:

talk about... this and so many other tangents. I feel like we could have probably pulled like

Speaker:

three or four episodes out of here. I wasn't sure what I was going to focus in on, but we

Speaker:

hit some really key points and yeah, I'm grateful for this discussion. So thank you, K and thank

Speaker:

you, Martin. And please keep up your good work. Yeah, thank you so much for having me. Solidarity.

Speaker:

That is a wrap on another episode of Blueprints of Disruption. Thank you for joining us. Also,

Speaker:

a very big thank you to the producer of our show, Santiago Helu Quintero. Blueprints of

Speaker:

Disruption is an independent production operated cooperatively. You can follow us on Twitter

Speaker:

at BPofDisruption. If you'd like to help us continue disrupting the status quo, please

Speaker:

share our content. And if you have the means, consider becoming a patron. Not only does our

Speaker:

support come from the progressive community, so does our content. So reach out to us and

Speaker:

let us know what or who we should be amplifying. So until next time, keep disrupting.