If you've ever listened to any of my podcasts before, you have seen our guest
Speaker:then because he has been around for quite some time. And every time I get
Speaker:the chance, I will talk to him and ask him. He is quite
Speaker:far, far and away my favorite podcast lawyer. In fact, he is
Speaker:the podcast lawyer. We are chatting with Gordon Firemark, the
Speaker:podcast lawyer. You can learn more about him at gordanfiremark.com,
Speaker:checking out his easy legal for podcasters course, giving
Speaker:you all the things you need in order to protect your podcast, to protect
Speaker:your brand. And he's also got
Speaker:podcastlawforms.com, a great place for
Speaker:legal templates to help you get your stuff underway. Gordon, thank you for
Speaker:joining me, and great to see you again, sir. Great to see you, Matthew. It's
Speaker:always a pleasure. I'm glad to be here. So, of course, you know, again, I've
Speaker:I've heard this, but for those who've never heard before, tell us how did you
Speaker:get your start into podcasting? Not just on the law side, but generally, like,
Speaker:when did you first pick up the microphone? I got involved
Speaker:in in theater audio, at a very young age.
Speaker:I I I mean, I I got hooked into the theater world when I was,
Speaker:like, five years old, six years old, kindergartner. And, by the time I was in
Speaker:junior high, I was running the lights and sound at school variety shows and things
Speaker:like that. Did that all through high school and into college as a professional sound
Speaker:engineer in in live theater environments. And it
Speaker:was only after college when I shifted into radio, TV, and film
Speaker:as my major, that I thought about going to law school.
Speaker:And so this has been with me for a really long time. And
Speaker:then the podcasting thing came about when I started my
Speaker:own practice, and I was looking for ways to market. Pretty much as soon as
Speaker:podcasting became a thing, I,
Speaker:I geeked out on it. What so I
Speaker:mean alright. So you've been doing, you know, podcast
Speaker:since, what, like, 02/2009, '2 thousand '10 ish? I was first asked
Speaker:as a guest on some shows in about 02/2006, I think it was.
Speaker:And and when that guy who we ended up doing a show together for
Speaker:about a year, and then, eventually, his boss made him stop
Speaker:because he was moonlighting according to the boss. And,
Speaker:so I by that time, I was hooked, and I decided I would go out
Speaker:and find a cohost and get started. And then my wife and I well, my
Speaker:wife had the baby. I'd I was there for the fun part. But
Speaker:but, so that, you know, hung things up for a
Speaker:few months. But, yeah, it was mid two thousand nine when we launched. That's, what,
Speaker:sixteen years ago now. So at the at the time, you
Speaker:were thinking about how to market your well, it was a step
Speaker:ostensibly entertainment law firm, but then you decided,
Speaker:well, there's a lot going on in the podcasting world. Maybe I should have a
Speaker:little bit more of a core focus in this space in particular. Well, I
Speaker:still practice a broad base of entertainment law. It just happens that podcasters
Speaker:are are you know, they're my people, so I like to work with them. And
Speaker:and, I've targeted a lot of my marketing in that direction. The fact of it
Speaker:is the show, the that original show from sixteen years ago, still going strong.
Speaker:It's a monthly entertainment law roundup kind of a
Speaker:show we do call entertainment law update, real original name.
Speaker:And, Yeah. We've been doing it consistently on a
Speaker:monthly basis since 02/2009. So we're at recording a hundred and seventy
Speaker:seventh episode next week or the later this week, actually. So Wow.
Speaker:Congratulations. Feels pretty good. So as someone who's been
Speaker:in this space for quite some time, have seen podcasters from all levels, right, just
Speaker:starting out to veterans who have been around for, I guess, I can now say
Speaker:decades. You know, what are some of the most
Speaker:common legal stumbles that
Speaker:podcasters are making or are bound to make,
Speaker:if they're not putting too much thought into this process? Well, I mean, the first
Speaker:thing is is that that thing you just said, not putting too much
Speaker:thought into this or or waiting too long to start getting themselves
Speaker:organized from a legal standpoint. But, you know, from there, it's
Speaker:it's just not taking taking it seriously as
Speaker:a kind of a business thing. You know, if you're if you're podcasting as the
Speaker:business, then you need to think about setting it up as a business with the
Speaker:corporation or an LLC or something like that, and and
Speaker:having good contracts and those kinds of things in place, especially if you're
Speaker:working with a cohost or something like that. Having what I call a
Speaker:podcast prenup, kinda articulates the
Speaker:relationship and and addresses not only what happens when things are going well, but
Speaker:also what if it doesn't. You know? How do we how do we go our
Speaker:separate ways in a way that everybody's comfortable with? And,
Speaker:and so that prenup becomes a cohost agreement or collaboration
Speaker:agreement or joint venture, whatever, you know, can take different forms.
Speaker:The other area of areas, of course, are intellectual
Speaker:property. You know, you you,
Speaker:neglect copyright law at your peril, both as a creator where you
Speaker:own the copyrights and if you don't do what you can to protect them, you
Speaker:may find others using your content. But also when you use people's music
Speaker:or clips in your show, you better know the rules and do it right, or
Speaker:or you're gonna have, pushback there. And I'd say
Speaker:the most important legal thing to
Speaker:do for most podcasters is, look at your title, make
Speaker:sure it's a distinctive brand name that you can protect with a
Speaker:trademark. And registering a trademark is a an important step
Speaker:in making sure you don't end up at one of the 12 shows with the
Speaker:same title in the marketplace. Or worst case, you are copying
Speaker:somebody who already has that trademark. You've launched the show, and now you gotta go
Speaker:back and redo a bunch of stuff or undo a bunch of things. Yeah. Do
Speaker:a search before you choose your title if you're if you can so that, you
Speaker:know, you're not stepping on somebody's toes. How do you know if if when you
Speaker:search for a name, whether or not that name is protected
Speaker:versus just being common or popular?
Speaker:Well, what can be protected under the law is
Speaker:distinctive. So it has to be it has to reach a a
Speaker:certain threshold of distinctiveness. So if I call my show the biz
Speaker:the the basket weaving podcast, then there can be 12 basket
Speaker:weaving podcasts, and nobody's gonna have a claim because it's
Speaker:purely descriptive of what you get. Now over time,
Speaker:I mentioned my own show, Entertainment Law Update. You know, I've been doing it for
Speaker:sixteen years. It has acquired some distinctiveness and in the sense
Speaker:that there's a secondary meaning. When when people go looking
Speaker:for my show, they know they're looking for my show, Entertainment Law Update.
Speaker:So that is now protectable and registerable as a trademark.
Speaker:But, how do you know well, first of all, it doesn't
Speaker:matter whether it's registered or not. If you're not the first in the marketplace with
Speaker:that title, think about choosing a different title. Don't be
Speaker:following in other people's footsteps with with your title because that's
Speaker:leads to confusion, and that's what trademark law is really about protecting against.
Speaker:At what point does a you know,
Speaker:it makes sense. You're a business. Right? You're a brand. There's a lot more things
Speaker:that you have to think about and protect, and, you know, you've got clients
Speaker:and sponsors and all that. But if I'm just
Speaker:average Joe, average Jane, thinking about starting up a podcast,
Speaker:how much do I really have to worry about this? Well, there
Speaker:I would say there's different kinds of podcasters. There's Average Joe or
Speaker:Jane doing a podcast as sort of a hobby, a side thing that they're just
Speaker:have doing for the fun of it. And, you know, they wanna maybe make have
Speaker:a little impact and influence, but is it really a a business?
Speaker:Probably not. They don't need to necessarily worry too much, certainly not
Speaker:about the business structure, the LLC, or the corporation.
Speaker:Trademark stuff, I think you still don't want someone else coming along and
Speaker:using the same name. That's gonna be,
Speaker:it's gonna dilute the value of what you build over time. So
Speaker:that, I think, is still pretty important. Then there are those who are doing it
Speaker:as a business, and they need to think very hard about this, about protecting
Speaker:what they're building structurally, in
Speaker:terms of ownership as well as the the title and things like that and and
Speaker:having really good strong contracts with the folks that they do business with.
Speaker:And then there's the third group who are podcasting as an
Speaker:adjunct or as a branch of their business, oftentimes a marketing arm
Speaker:for the business. Let's say you run a law practice and you wanna
Speaker:attract more folks to your practice. You hold yourself out, put yourself out there
Speaker:as an expert. Maybe they don't need the LLC, but
Speaker:they still need to protect the brand and and think about
Speaker:not saying the wrong thing, hurting someone's reputation, defamation
Speaker:kinds of things, or infringing on copyright. So I think
Speaker:everybody needs to be mindful of you
Speaker:not using content they don't own. I guess that's the that's probably the most
Speaker:common complaint I see. Yeah. And that's that's always one of the common
Speaker:questions that you see in a lot of support groups and support chats
Speaker:around podcasting. You know? Can I use this song? Can I use this
Speaker:music? And, you know, I think ever since I met you, my
Speaker:my test for that has been very simple. Do you own it? Nope. Then no.
Speaker:Right, like, it's it's just that simple. So for those who
Speaker:are really this is more serious. They've got plans for
Speaker:monetization, for building a brand off of it, for making a
Speaker:ton of money off of it, or it's or it's building upon an existing
Speaker:brand, which has other assets and things that are worth protecting.
Speaker:You have the, you know, the podcasters easy
Speaker:legal for podcasters. What is that all about? What is that
Speaker:system like? What will people expect to get if they sign up for this program?
Speaker:Well, so when I started practicing as an as a as a podcast lawyer
Speaker:specifically, I I realized that I was doing these things for folks
Speaker:who could afford and wanted to hire lawyers to do these things, forming the
Speaker:LLC or the corporation, doing the trademarks, the copyrights, the the
Speaker:contracts, getting it all getting it all, squared away
Speaker:for them, the done for you kind of a model. And then I realized there's
Speaker:a lot of folks who want to get this stuff done or need to get
Speaker:this stuff done, but don't have the resources or the inclination
Speaker:to hire me to do it for them. So I wanted to create something that
Speaker:was a little more accessible and and would allow them to do it
Speaker:themselves with guidance and
Speaker:instruction and forms and templates from me. So the Easy Legal for
Speaker:Broadcasters program is a is a four part course that
Speaker:teaches these things along with literally
Speaker:step by step how to instructional videos on how to form that
Speaker:LLC, how to register that trademark, that copyright, what to put in where in
Speaker:the contract. And we give you all the contracts and templates and things that
Speaker:you need to to get your business up and running, as
Speaker:smoothly and quickly as possible. So it is what it says. Easy
Speaker:legal for podcasters. And it is in fact just that. Now, again,
Speaker:you're not someone now we're talking to someone again. Back to that average Joe, average
Speaker:Dane. You have these podcast law forms. What are some of
Speaker:the common ones that someone who's hearing this is like, ugh, I don't think I
Speaker:need all that, but there's definitely probably a few things that are probably helpful. What
Speaker:are some of those real helpful forms and resources that law forms
Speaker:would be good for that, you know, just starting out podcast or that indie podcast?
Speaker:Well, I think that podcast prenup is definitely one. If you're starting a show with
Speaker:other people, you wanna establish the nature of that relationship. And
Speaker:it's, you know, it's fundamentally a partnership agreement of some sort, but it
Speaker:outlines the specifics of who's responsible for doing what, those kinds
Speaker:of things. If you are, working with guests, I offer a
Speaker:free guest release agreement that is essentially getting
Speaker:written consent for the recording and the editing and the publication
Speaker:of the episode without which, you may find yourself with a
Speaker:guest who later comes back and says, I don't like that. Take it down. And
Speaker:you're kinda kind of in a rock and hard place situation,
Speaker:especially if you have sponsors that are paying to have that episode up, and now
Speaker:you've got a issue there. So, obviously, you don't wanna
Speaker:alienate good friends who are guests, but at the same time, you put a lot
Speaker:of effort into making a show, so you wanna keep that up.
Speaker:I will admit I'm one of those people who definitely started using the podcast
Speaker:guest disclaimer form. Not that I've ever had a problem with it, but
Speaker:it's one of those places, and this is true of many facets of
Speaker:the law, where it's not a problem until it is.
Speaker:And something I've always said to my kids to an annoying level, and if
Speaker:you ask them, they'll, you know, repeat it back to you with kind of that
Speaker:groan, snarky tone. Right? It's better to have it and not need it than need
Speaker:it and not have it. And I imagine that is a cornerstone of a lot
Speaker:of what you do. It it's also I agree a %, but I also
Speaker:think that when you present your
Speaker:your face to the guest or whoever as a business, hey. I'm,
Speaker:you know, I'm serious about this. There's this thing I need you to look at
Speaker:and sign or click the box or whatever it is. Now they
Speaker:take it seriously too, and they will remember. You know?
Speaker:Maybe maybe among those people who've never been a problem,
Speaker:someone once got a little irritated and started thinking, I should get them to take
Speaker:it out, but I signed that thing. So you never heard anything more
Speaker:about it. Mission accomplished. Yeah. Well, that's that's the lucky
Speaker:way to go. One place that I'm sure you've been discussing a lot, we we've
Speaker:only kinda, you know, dipped around the the edges a little bit, but I'm curious
Speaker:what you're seeing. What what's happening with AI and
Speaker:podcasting? More so on the on the
Speaker:folks who are using AI to completely generate or
Speaker:create their content, what are some pitfalls that they're gonna need to be watching out
Speaker:for? What are some things on the horizon that you think are coming down the
Speaker:pipeline for them? Great, great question, and it is definitely the
Speaker:hot topic these days. The the AI is a bit of a double edged sword.
Speaker:You know? It's a great tool. It's very useful, very helpful. In
Speaker:order to do that, of course, it has had to go out and slurp up
Speaker:a lot of content from the Internet, and and that it's being all the AI
Speaker:companies are being sued over this ingestion and
Speaker:training based on existing copyrighted works, and these
Speaker:lawsuits are, mostly just in the beginning stages. One of them
Speaker:recently came down, in a verdict that said not a
Speaker:verdict, a court ruling that said what the AI
Speaker:company had done ingesting this particular content was not fair
Speaker:use, So that means it is copyright infringement. And now we move on
Speaker:to how much they have to pay that phase. So that's one
Speaker:side of it. But the other side, the the creator side is we
Speaker:use these tools somewhat at our peril because, a, they
Speaker:don't always get it right. So if you use the AI to write a script
Speaker:about a particular topic, it could be filled with some
Speaker:errors and the mistakes can be troublesome, especially if you're talking about a
Speaker:particular there was a situation where someone used an AI to write an article about
Speaker:a person and the AI kind of assumed
Speaker:a different person was the person we were talking about. And that person
Speaker:had a criminal record, and the person we were really talking about didn't, and it
Speaker:became the whole defamation thing. The publisher of the show who put
Speaker:that out was in the crosshairs of the lawsuit
Speaker:over false information that hurt this person's reputation.
Speaker:So that's apparel. Another side of this is
Speaker:that the copyright office has generally held that material
Speaker:that's generated by artificial intelligence isn't entitled
Speaker:to copyright protection. So if you're using it to craft the whole episode,
Speaker:you're not gonna be able to claim ownership of that episode
Speaker:and prevent other people from copying it.
Speaker:That's interesting. Yeah. And the theory is that copyright is about protecting
Speaker:human authorship. So no human author and this is true
Speaker:of photographs that have been taken by
Speaker:there's a there was a monkey selfie case a number of years ago. There was
Speaker:a case involving an elephant that painted using a paintbrush it held
Speaker:in its trunk. And, again, the Copyright Office has consistently said, nope. Those don't get
Speaker:copyright. They don't they're not protected. Now just recently,
Speaker:like in the last week or two, there was a case where the copyright
Speaker:office did grant copyright to an AI generated work
Speaker:because the author had done so much additional prompting
Speaker:to craft the work to be just what he wanted. And,
Speaker:the work is called a single slice of American cheese or it's a just a
Speaker:visual artwork. But if you wanna go look it up, it it's actually kind of
Speaker:a fun thing to look at. But that's a very specific use case with
Speaker:a a very, deliberate effort to
Speaker:prove what could be done. So Interesting. So I
Speaker:I wanna go back real quickly to right. We've talked a lot about, you know,
Speaker:as far as how you can protect
Speaker:yourself from stealing other people's content, taking music, taking
Speaker:show titles. But, right, as an indie podcaster, we don't really
Speaker:contemplate too much about protecting our own work, our own
Speaker:craft. Are there situations or have you seen a
Speaker:situation where some big network or big show starts to
Speaker:dabble with an independent podcaster's material and
Speaker:that podcaster had some sort of recourse that they should take? Well,
Speaker:there have been cases where, podcast actually,
Speaker:networks have, have ended up carrying a
Speaker:podcast that wasn't supposed to be on that network. I'm not gonna name
Speaker:names, but, and, you know, it was pretty easy to get it removed
Speaker:from the network. They don't want the trouble, and and they'll just take it down.
Speaker:There's this mechanism, the DMCA, Digital Millennium Copyright Act, that
Speaker:allows for takedowns. When there's infringing work,
Speaker:the owner of that work can just notify the hosting company or
Speaker:the network or whatever and say, hey. That's infringing my stuff. Take it
Speaker:down. You have to follow a particular procedure and form,
Speaker:for sending that notice. But then the company, in order to avoid being
Speaker:sued itself, will take it down right away and just
Speaker:basically let's say, okay. If you think that's still valid and should be up
Speaker:there, you guys go fight it out and let us know. And and that's you
Speaker:know, we've all seen a YouTube video that we were linked to that wasn't there
Speaker:anymore or something like that. That that's the DMCA takedown. So it's actually
Speaker:a relatively, what's the word, painless and
Speaker:easy process to to get material taken
Speaker:down in this day and age of the web. Now if there's been a lot
Speaker:of profit generated from it, there may be a reason to actually go and sue
Speaker:the the infringers and things like that, but it does happen.
Speaker:Fortunately, well, or maybe it's unfortunate,
Speaker:podcasts aren't necessarily a a ripe target for this kind of stuff.
Speaker:I mean, I guess there are some shows that have such a big audience that
Speaker:they're you know, people wanna use their stuff. I've
Speaker:I couldn't imagine clips of some of those top shows out there being
Speaker:repurposed and and rebroadcast and things like that. And, in fact,
Speaker:I was just telling you before we started, there's a recent case in
Speaker:the copyright claims board involving
Speaker:a podcast that was doing a critique of this particular
Speaker:online influencer and her lawyer who were going after people.
Speaker:And, of course, when they used a clip from the from that influencer's
Speaker:content and that lawyer's content, they then sued the
Speaker:podcast, and the podcasters just just won last week, a
Speaker:finding that what they were doing was fair use. And that's that
Speaker:defense to copyright infringement that's meant for
Speaker:education and criticism and commentary kinds of material.
Speaker:So there is a way. And I guess that does lead
Speaker:to the other big issue, which is, right, if you are
Speaker:using somebody else's stuff, right, you're using a song, you're using
Speaker:clips, what whatever it is. Typically, what is it gonna look like as the
Speaker:podcast? Or what are you going to experience? Is it going to be
Speaker:you know, are you gonna get subpoena to a lawsuit? Are you just gonna get
Speaker:a takedown? Are you just getting an email? Like, what is the what what is
Speaker:the evolution of of trouble gonna look like for
Speaker:you? Well, there are some law firms out there that have made a
Speaker:business of going after folks that infringe on these sort of
Speaker:smallish scales. And, you know, they
Speaker:they come at you with a threat of a what I what I would call
Speaker:a nuisance lawsuit. You know, pay us a few hundred or a few thousand dollars,
Speaker:and we won't sue you. And, you know, it's easier to pay
Speaker:it than it is to fight it. So you might see that. Most often, it's
Speaker:gonna be that DMCA takedown. And, you know, it's at best, it's
Speaker:an embarrassment if your show goes live on Monday
Speaker:and it's down on Tuesday or or Wednesday or even months later. That
Speaker:episode missing from your feed kind of leaves a gaping
Speaker:hole, at least in some shows. So that
Speaker:embarrassment and if you then push to get it put back up because
Speaker:you think it was legal, then you get into the
Speaker:these claims in the copyright claims board or or going to,
Speaker:full grown federal court over these kinds of things. It does happen, but,
Speaker:fortunately, not that often. Gotcha.
Speaker:And I guess the the big thing here is that even if
Speaker:you are I don't wanna say even if you're in the
Speaker:right, but, typically, no matter
Speaker:what, this experience is going to be painful for you even if you're
Speaker:right. Is that true? Like, if you're facing takedown
Speaker:notices, if somebody is claiming you're using their property incorrectly
Speaker:or, you know, a lot of people like to say, but it's fair use. Right?
Speaker:Like, fair use maybe, but it's still gonna
Speaker:be painful. Yeah. Yeah. So,
Speaker:painful yeah. I mean, tell me choose your pain, I guess.
Speaker:Having your episode taken down and just living with it is is a kind of
Speaker:pain, and it's sort of an embarrassment I was was talking about. Fighting it is
Speaker:a painful process. It takes a long time. It takes a lot of back and
Speaker:forth and hiring people like me to help you and represent you in these
Speaker:cases. And, yeah, I mean, I've I've I've never met
Speaker:anybody who's been a party in a lawsuit who is enjoying the process.
Speaker:Fair use is an interesting thing because it is a defense in copyright
Speaker:infringement. So if you're gonna if you have to say, but it's fair
Speaker:use, chances are someone's already threatening or suing
Speaker:you. And, you know, that's just
Speaker:by then, you you're experiencing some of that pain already, and I would caution
Speaker:against it. If if what you're doing is real critic like movie
Speaker:criticism or music criticism or teaching real education kinds
Speaker:of stuff, then maybe there's an argument that fair use is is the way to
Speaker:go with what you're doing. I would say, you know,
Speaker:invest in a small a short consultation with someone like me to,
Speaker:make sure you're on the right path. Alright. That
Speaker:that is very fair. And, yeah, again, it's you know, if if the
Speaker:question you have to ask yourself is if you wanna use that piece of music
Speaker:in your episode and you believe that you have this
Speaker:fair use defense, will the cost
Speaker:of hiring lawyers, going to courts, dealing with all this
Speaker:stuff at the end of the day, was it did it
Speaker:improve your show by that much? Right? Like, was this battle worth it? Was your
Speaker:was your content so much better because you include that little music clip,
Speaker:or is it really just a giant headache for you? You know, I would say
Speaker:nine out of 10 times, it's not worth it. It's a big headache and or
Speaker:or big expense one way or the other, and it's better just to, you know,
Speaker:avoid you know, take the path of least resistance and and avoid
Speaker:using the thing. If you are doing something where you have to use a clip
Speaker:of the music to talk about the fact that the artist did this and
Speaker:was was exposed to that. You know? What a great either what a great or
Speaker:what a terrible person the artist is, those kinds of things. You know?
Speaker:The newsier, the better, I guess. And there are some situations where I'd
Speaker:say go ahead. And some shows where
Speaker:it's their their method of doing things. So I
Speaker:think they've done their legwork and figured out how
Speaker:to carve out those niches and do it right. As a reminder, we
Speaker:are chatting with Gordon Firemark. He is the podcast
Speaker:lawyer. You can get more about him at gordanfiremark.com.
Speaker:You can also check out his easy legal for podcasters
Speaker:program and his podcast law forms. Great resources
Speaker:for those of you who are looking for ways to protect your
Speaker:shows, protect your properties, without having to go, you
Speaker:know, too crazy on spending money for
Speaker:legal defenses and legal assistance. Gordon has been doing this for
Speaker:many, many years. I've known many, many, many podcasters who have
Speaker:taken advantage of his resources, present company included, and those who have
Speaker:worked with him, and you're getting a great product and a great service. So
Speaker:cannot encourage you to check him out enough. Gordon, before we let you
Speaker:go, we have questions we like to ask every podcast. So the first one is,
Speaker:is there a place in podcasting in general where you'd like to see improvement
Speaker:from distribution, production, creation,
Speaker:even from consumption? You know, something about podcasts, you were just like, god, I wish
Speaker:we did this better. Well, I think discoverability is the big gap
Speaker:in podcasting. It's just, you know, if I listen to a show
Speaker:that is about a particular topic or that has a particular I
Speaker:probably would like to hear other shows about it. And, you know, as an
Speaker:example of folks that are doing it really well, YouTube
Speaker:and their algorithm is brilliant at this. And, yeah, you you can we can get
Speaker:into the debate of whether what YouTube is calling podcasting is podcasting,
Speaker:but they're doing a good job of feeding you more stuff that they think you're
Speaker:gonna like. And the podcast community, they're just the mechanism
Speaker:isn't there. I think that's something that could be developed.
Speaker:I don't know. Maybe it's more like a good reads where you you self
Speaker:curate by explaining what you like and what you don't like about that. I don't
Speaker:know. There's there's there's options. That's one. And the other area would
Speaker:be monetization with
Speaker:micropayments or crypto or something, and I know there are some folks working on
Speaker:it. I think that needs to be built out bigger and
Speaker:better and, frankly, just easier to do for both consumers
Speaker:and creators. Couldn't agree with you more there. What
Speaker:about is there any tech on your wish list, whether something that's out there that
Speaker:you just haven't bought yourself or something that you're like, god. Somebody needs to make
Speaker:this piece of hardware or software that would make my podcasting life a lot
Speaker:easier. I, you know, I haven't identified
Speaker:a major major I mean, I've got I've
Speaker:spent a lot of money on the studio and and equipment, and I'm using a
Speaker:good mic I I wish I had a, this the
Speaker:what is it? The Shure SM seven, but I'm pretty happy with my
Speaker:Heil PR 40 here.
Speaker:Beyond that, no. I mean, I I I'm sure there are things that would make
Speaker:it easier for those less technically inclined
Speaker:to create a podcast quickly and easily and maybe even publish it.
Speaker:There are yeah. I mean, I think some kind of a
Speaker:maybe a back end software that would take a live stream
Speaker:and automatically convert it and turn it into a a
Speaker:podcast episode or something like that. But I think most of the tools are
Speaker:getting pretty good. The the AI editing assists are are getting
Speaker:I know for podcast editors, they don't like to hear that part. But, they're
Speaker:getting pretty good at identifying the stuff that needs to
Speaker:go. So Well, and as someone who's been in the
Speaker:space since, you know, February, it's it's certainly gotten a lot
Speaker:better since we first started. Right. And,
Speaker:lastly, are there any podcasts on your playlist that are must listen
Speaker:tos, whether new episode comes out, you're gonna stop and check it out, or you're
Speaker:just you're not gonna let that episode go by without checking it out?
Speaker:You know, I I listen to a lot of business podcasts and and and marketing
Speaker:oriented stuff. I'm not a big entertainment content
Speaker:consumer. So most of what I listen to is, yeah,
Speaker:about how to how to do better in business, how to how to get more
Speaker:clients, get more traction with things and so on. So my one of my
Speaker:favorites is a a guy named Colin Boyd who is a coach and
Speaker:teacher of of public speaking and speaking to
Speaker:sell, basically. And his show is called
Speaker:The Expert Edge with Colin Boyd. He's an Australian gentleman, a
Speaker:client, and a friend as well. And, his show is
Speaker:is must have weekly listening. I also like Amy
Speaker:Porterfield's online marketing made easy show. Although, I just heard
Speaker:she's changing it up and calling it the Amy Porterfield show starting in March.
Speaker:So Well, wonder if she got it with a trademark. I doubt
Speaker:it. I think she's just pivoting the
Speaker:the the focus of things a bit. You are probably correct. Once again, we have
Speaker:been chatting with the incredible Gordon Firemark, the podcast
Speaker:lawyer. You can learn more about him and all of his services at
Speaker:gordonfiremark.com, including the easy legal for
Speaker:podcasters program, his podcast law forms, and, yes, he's a
Speaker:podcaster. Check out the Legit Podcast Pro podcast for
Speaker:some quick two minute, three minute tips, every week from this
Speaker:wonderful gentleman, Gordon. It's great to see you. Great to chat with you. Thanks for
Speaker:being here. Thank you. It's been great being here. Appreciate it.