Speaker:

Welcome to Blueprints of Disruption. I'm your host, Jessa McLean. Very rarely does a day

Speaker:

go by that I'm not faced with the question of what we should do about the NDP. Or rather,

Speaker:

what does the left do about electoral politics since the NDP has become an institution run

Speaker:

by consultants and hostile to reformists? This discussion started long before the recent

Speaker:

downgrading of the party. It's a discussion that frankly has been going on for generations.

Speaker:

If you listened to last week's re-upping of an episode with my dad, you would have heard

Speaker:

about attempts by the Waffle Party to pull the NDP left and the work the Lewis family did

Speaker:

to prevent that. I myself have been part of attempts at reform, or maybe you could call

Speaker:

them revolt. Either way, You're not going to find me encouraging people to spend energies

Speaker:

there. In fact, quite the opposite. So then the question becomes, if not the NDP, then

Speaker:

what? Surely we don't support the liberals or conservatives here. I don't want to get started

Speaker:

about the Green Party, but clearly folks are looking for alternatives. And that's exactly

Speaker:

what drove our next guest to do what they did. Start their own party. We'll get their origin

Speaker:

story. the hurdles they're facing and what they think distinguishes them from the NDP.

Speaker:

Their platform, they've kept it pretty focused. It boils down to three main points. Food and

Speaker:

shelter as a human right, tax the rich and electoral reform. But the discussion goes well

Speaker:

beyond policy points. The three candidates that have joined us from the revolution party are

Speaker:

quite candid about the high chaos that comes from starting a political party from scratch.

Speaker:

Lots of layers to figure out beyond enlisting volunteers and more candidates. They need to

Speaker:

figure out how they're going to prevent things like leadership cults or ensure the elected

Speaker:

are held accountable. What about registering with Elections Canada? Hearing the struggles

Speaker:

of these infancy stages, but also the determination of the folks navigating it together, provides

Speaker:

lessons for all of us. If you're a regular listener, you know this isn't an endorsement of a political

Speaker:

party. I can hardly endorse electoral politics at all. But I know the audience includes people

Speaker:

like our guests who are equally disappointed with the NDP but don't want to give up on that

Speaker:

realm of influence. And I support getting where we're going through many routes. This is why

Speaker:

we do what we do here. share stories from people on the ground doing the work, whether that's

Speaker:

intervening in elections or building blockades. Our library is full of blueprints of disruption.

Speaker:

If you'd like to support our work, there are links in the show notes to become a patron,

Speaker:

but sharing our content is also a huge boost. We're also looking to expand our team over

Speaker:

here, so If you'd like to contribute to our mission of amplifying and equipping the grassroots,

Speaker:

reach out to us on any of our platforms. And now, as promised, the Revolution Party of

Speaker:

Canada. All right, we're here. Welcome, everybody. We've got three comrades in the studio with

Speaker:

us today. I am Kira Loughlin. I am a candidate for the Revolution Party of Canada in the Parkland

Speaker:

Riding of Alberta. I don't look at currently because I just got back from an appointment,

Speaker:

but I am usually a hardcore goth girl and I am 100 % proud about that. But yeah, this

Speaker:

is my first foray into anything political. I haven't even done city level stuff. So big

Speaker:

P political, because like everything we do is political. Yeah, yeah. Big P political. I'm

Speaker:

one of those people that gets really annoyed at somebody that says I don't like to talk

Speaker:

politics because I'm like, everything is politics. Yeah, I can't see someone who's like never

Speaker:

been political joining the Revolution Party. So there had to have been a bit of a kernel

Speaker:

there, but I get where you're coming from. definitely was. My name is Mathieu Labeltasse. I'm from

Speaker:

the writing of Saint-Michel and Saint-Laurent in Montreal. I started in politics as being

Speaker:

a pretty hard right winger. And then after that, by reading and going to university, I

Speaker:

became a full on leftist. I tried to join Québec solidaire into a provincial writing,

Speaker:

but I decided to move on to the entire federal level now. Interesting. Interesting. You saw

Speaker:

my mouth open there when you mentioned you were a hard right winger, but the pipeline of education

Speaker:

is real, thankfully. Troy, welcome. Hello, my name is Troy Roberts. I'm the presumptive

Speaker:

candidate for the Niagara South Riding in Ontario. I'm a longtime socialist, and I've been searching

Speaker:

for a political home for almost as long as I have been one. I haven't really managed to

Speaker:

find anything that fits. As soon as I heard about the Revolution Party, I went straight

Speaker:

to the website, checked it out, and I was a member minutes later. This place is exactly

Speaker:

what I've always been searching for, and I decided to represent it because of that. You guys are

Speaker:

real rainbow collection of political background from seemingly none, Kira, let's stop, but

Speaker:

you know, none, the right wing to, you know, Solidaire kind of worked her way through the

Speaker:

system and Troy, a lot of people can resonate with your not having a political home. I mean,

Speaker:

now we'll talk about where you're at now and why that excites you so much, but You know,

Speaker:

from a leftist perspective, you folks even say it in the press conference you gave during

Speaker:

the federal election. I will link that to the episode. Folks need to watch that as they really

Speaker:

go into detail. But you mentioned kind of being the alternative to the NDP for leftists. So

Speaker:

everyone's seen the implosion. I mean, we saw it coming before the election, but now it's

Speaker:

official. So the discussion naturally goes to what do we do now? And I see some comrades

Speaker:

trying to reform the NDP. So maybe they want to save this episode for later. I don't know.

Speaker:

But then there's a lot of people who are just done. They don't want to give up electoral

Speaker:

politics, though. And they want to know, you know, more about the Revolution Party, but

Speaker:

also, you know, what it took to create something from scratch. That's a big jump to just People

Speaker:

seem to be stuck in that reform stage. Some people just leave altogether. I'm kind of

Speaker:

drifted away from electoral politics altogether. But then there's you folks, and you've done

Speaker:

something about it. So how did the Revolution Party come about? I asked you for your origin

Speaker:

story. It was about three years ago when Jamie, he was the bald fellow with a beard in both

Speaker:

of the press conferences. Yeah, it was three years ago when he started, he just kind of

Speaker:

got the name, he bought the domain and his mom was like, you're crazy. And he was like,

Speaker:

whatever. And I think it was only within the last year or so that like they actually started

Speaker:

looking for members and they really got people going. I think the origin story of the Revolution

Speaker:

Party of Canada is it started in Jamie's room. They all got to start somewhere. Right. They

Speaker:

got to start somewhere. least it was in the garage. sounds like so cliche, you do have

Speaker:

to start somewhere. But that is what stops people from doing something. I mean, a lot of things

Speaker:

do the lack of electoral reform and the struggle of a small upstart party trying to make impact

Speaker:

electorally. just the daunting process of rather than stepping into an institution, no matter

Speaker:

how marred it is, seems a lot easier than starting from the basement and trying to build

Speaker:

from there. But you've grown quite a lot since just Jamie. So quickly. Yeah. I think we're

Speaker:

up to about 50 candidates confirmed right now. So these are folks that are just like ready

Speaker:

to run in a federal election. Well, whether it be five months from now or four years from

Speaker:

now. Yes, they're all ready. Yeah, basically. Really as a party. The stuff that we're working

Speaker:

on currently is we're getting our inaugural caucus sorted out. Right now it is high chaos

Speaker:

in the party, right? It's very disorganized. It's hard to tell what's going on, but with

Speaker:

all of the planning that's going on, we're getting meetings together for the various regions,

Speaker:

for various candidates, instead of just all one meeting like we were doing before. Yeah,

Speaker:

the inaugural caucus is currently our primary focus and we're... three to six months on that,

Speaker:

although I would add another three months on top of that. People tend to underestimate how

Speaker:

long a project takes. Indeed. So it's your goal to kind of create a shadow cabinet of sorts?

Speaker:

Essentially. So what we're going to be doing is the inaugural caucus is going to be what's

Speaker:

responsible for voting on literally everything that we're going to do as a party. Might add

Speaker:

some red tape, but we're also making it so that our manifesto and our platform is the absolute,

Speaker:

right? It can be changed, obviously, but it will require a majority vote. We're going to

Speaker:

be introducing pretty tight term limits for leaders of the party, and we're going to have

Speaker:

a triumvirate. What's that? That is when three people are in the lead and they work within

Speaker:

or they work with one another to lead the party or entity or of some sort. So we're trying

Speaker:

our absolute best to make sure that this is not going to become a one person party. All

Speaker:

right. I'm down with like abolishing leadership cult. Have you ever, has anybody here ever

Speaker:

experienced this structure before? You know, with three... No, can't say I ...shared leaders?

Speaker:

What did you call it again? A triumvirate. I did, but it wasn't three. It was two party.

Speaker:

It's a... Three in the green party? No. The Quebec, Quebec Solidaire, they have the male

Speaker:

candidates and the female candidates. They support something that's called the parité, which I

Speaker:

do not know the word in English. Gender parity. Yeah, gender parity. Yeah. And they want to

Speaker:

try to have like equal amount of women candidates as equal amount of male candidates. And they

Speaker:

want to have that amount of people inside as candidates. And they want to win that that

Speaker:

way. Do folks approach equity that way? Not to that same one to one level, I don't think

Speaker:

we are trying to get as much representation for as many different communities as we can,

Speaker:

like actively so. But we're not breaking it down to the math. just trying to attract as

Speaker:

much diversity as we can. Yeah, I will say I'm a lesbian. I haven't faced any issues within

Speaker:

the party. I've not had any of those people that go up to you and say, you're only a lesbian

Speaker:

because you haven't been with the right guy. That's a low bar, Kira. It is a low bar, but

Speaker:

unfortunately, that is the bar of reality, right? This is just kind of the situation that

Speaker:

we're in as people who are part of the 2SLGBTQIA. Oh, and there's also quite a few trans people

Speaker:

who have joined as well. And it's been amazing to see that there's been a lot of support for

Speaker:

the trans folk in the community. We've seen a lot of women join, honestly. Like, it hasn't

Speaker:

really been something that's crossed my mind because it hasn't seemed like we needed it,

Speaker:

right? We're a very, very diverse bunch, it feels like. Did you experience the most growth

Speaker:

during the federal election or were you a robust team going into it? The most growth we got

Speaker:

was right after our initial press conference and Steve Boots made a video on us. We owe

Speaker:

a lot to Steve Boots. I joined because of Steve as well. So. Right. There's so many people

Speaker:

who have joined because of Steve. Yeah. And both of the videos he's made, we've had a huge

Speaker:

influx of people from them. Did all of you run as candidates, like a campaign? We only

Speaker:

ran the five, but next time it's going to be quite a lot more than Yeah, but they weren't

Speaker:

they weren't seen as the revolutionary party. They were seen as independence. Yeah, the party

Speaker:

itself and get registered in time. That is what folks are daunted by though, too, right? So

Speaker:

how do I start a new party with Elections Canada? How do I start taking in donations? How do

Speaker:

we become an official party down the road? I mean, there are parts of starting a new

Speaker:

party that folks are just... It's a very esoteric thing. Yeah, because it's like chicken and

Speaker:

the egg as well, right? You really need somebody who can do... put a lot of hours into doing

Speaker:

a lot of aspects about partisan politics to, you know, get into an election and be effective.

Speaker:

But at the same time, that requires funds and you have to grow before you can even start

Speaker:

taking in funds. you know, participating in the election definitely isn't limited to any

Speaker:

kind of... party status and we definitely know it's not limited to official party status.

Speaker:

I get it. mean, just look at the longest ballot initiative. Yeah. I mean, you still went through

Speaker:

the process and probably learned so many lessons from the federal election as a new party.

Speaker:

What, what really threw you for a loop if anything? For me, it's how ignored by media

Speaker:

we are. Yeah. Yeah. Like in both of our press conferences, we didn't get a single question

Speaker:

from the media that was present there. we haven't gotten any other media attention besides independent,

Speaker:

right? Like on YouTube or on here. It's a hidden card, you know, like it's a hidden card. Like

Speaker:

I know that the media will not want to talk to us unless we do something major or unless

Speaker:

we grab their attention or unless we grab the attention of everybody. Like when I mean everybody,

Speaker:

I mean like everybody. One of the things I was impressed by was by how well some of our

Speaker:

candidates did. had one of our candidates get triple digit votes from a party that got,

Speaker:

think 111, I believe you said something like that. Uh, but a fair few for somebody that

Speaker:

nobody's ever heard of. One of the things that I believe is that when people hear our message

Speaker:

and the things we have to say and the reasons that we're saying them and they hear it clearly,

Speaker:

I think it's going to be really, really popular. And I feel like that initial result sort of

Speaker:

bolsters my opinion there. you have you sat Greg down and have him completely dissect

Speaker:

his campaign for you folks to replicate? I remember correctly, Greg didn't really run

Speaker:

much of a campaign. think he was mostly grassroots within the Edmonton area. And yeah, he still

Speaker:

managed to get triple digits out of that. And yeah, as far as I'm aware, it was fully grassroots

Speaker:

on his part. Just door knocking. Yeah, well, I mean, ask him what he was saying to people

Speaker:

at the door and how he managed to even have like that many, especially as an independent.

Speaker:

So it wasn't even, you know, the word revolution that drew people to check that box, right?

Speaker:

They seem to have gone in there with his name in mind to vote an independent. So we have

Speaker:

a communist. Well, there's communists all over the place running, but, you know, in Barry.

Speaker:

They max out at 100 votes and they have an entire established party. People understand

Speaker:

what the name means, even if they don't have any idea who the candidate is. So, you know,

Speaker:

there might be secrets there in Gregory's campaign that I would do a postmortem, you know, from

Speaker:

as well as the other candidates. But what's going to make the next one different for you

Speaker:

folks? You think you'll be registered as a party and be able to run under a banner? Yeah, that's

Speaker:

the plan. Right now, what we're telling candidates who are just antsy for things to do is get

Speaker:

out there, do the grassroots stuff. We have people participating in the Alberta protests

Speaker:

against the separatism referendums. have candidates just meeting together in general, getting to

Speaker:

know one another, trying to operate on the same ground. At least that's what's happening

Speaker:

here in Edmonton. Generally speaking, we're just encouraging every candidate to be as grassroots

Speaker:

as possible. Get the name out there, do anything you can just to first make people less scared

Speaker:

of Revolution Party of Canada because it's a name that we have gotten a lot of pushback

Speaker:

on so far of a lot of people being like, that's a scary name. You guys are crazy. But I love

Speaker:

it. It triggers the lips. I mean. It does. It gets a lot of people a little riled up.

Speaker:

that's kind of, there's some of us in the party who really like that. And some of us who are

Speaker:

like, oh, we probably shouldn't do that. I'm a big proponent of the name, specifically because

Speaker:

of the idea of the scary bit. We have more and more people that are, I mean, look what happened

Speaker:

to the NDP, right? More and more people are, they don't want the status quo. They know things

Speaker:

are going wrong. They know things are going poorly. They want some kind of change. And

Speaker:

a lot of people just don't really know what kind of change to go for. So when we talk about

Speaker:

revolution, we're talking about a massive change from the status quo. And again, we've got all

Speaker:

these policies and opinions that I think people are really going to like. And I think a lot

Speaker:

of people are going to decide that our kind of revolution is what they want. Well, let's

Speaker:

test your theory, Troy. You folks ran on a kind of a nice, simple three point. I mean, it's

Speaker:

not as cut and dry as three points. They go a little deeper than that. But your platform,

Speaker:

your platform was three. major points. You folks each want to run through one. I'm sure you've

Speaker:

done the spiel and you know what makes you revolutionary. mean food and water as a human

Speaker:

right. That's a big one. There I think a lot of food deserts. I think of small towns that

Speaker:

have been gutted by companies moving away and they can't afford food. It's difficult to get

Speaker:

food in. I think of up north communities Nunavut, Yukon where you see prices from there, it's

Speaker:

like 40 bucks for a watermelon, just because there's no profit to be made from doing it

Speaker:

any other way. The idea that food and water should be available to everybody at all times

Speaker:

seems very, very basic to me because of the whole staying alive thing. Yeah, an important

Speaker:

thing to note as well is that we want to get this codified in the Canadian Charter of Rights

Speaker:

so that it cannot be revoked by whatever next party comes after us. Into the Charter? Yeah,

Speaker:

the right to specifically to food and water? Yeah, food, water and shelter. You one of the

Speaker:

biggest problems with the charter is that it doesn't secure any economic rights, right?

Speaker:

Like everything can be trumped or kind of whisked away based on public safety and the

Speaker:

lack of funds. We know there isn't a lack of funds, but the governments are allowed to

Speaker:

just simply say there are. So. The charter is perhaps not always the tool people wished

Speaker:

it could be. But surely I think folks will agree with you on food, shelter, water being

Speaker:

secured. One of the ideas I drew from your website that I think folks will find interesting is

Speaker:

the idea of nationalizing food banks. Yeah. So that would just be, I think, the start

Speaker:

of it because that's not a long-term solution, but the beginning with nationalizing food banks,

Speaker:

think is a great idea because so many food banks are so wildly underfunded. lot of folks would

Speaker:

suggest perhaps nationalizing grocery chains and the food supply. Yeah. These are kind

Speaker:

of baby steps to get us there. Yeah. So the the babyest of baby steps is pretty much

Speaker:

if we can get electoral reform through, if we can help push that through with the agreement

Speaker:

between liberals and the NDP or whatever ends up happening. Then our next goal is to introduce

Speaker:

a wealth flight tax of some kind. in the wild scenario that we all got, we got elected as

Speaker:

a majority party, wealth flight tax would be the first thing that we did, followed by taxing

Speaker:

the wealthy, which is the other, or one of our other three priorities, which is making

Speaker:

them pay their fair share. introducing new tax brackets like a 51 % income tax on people

Speaker:

who make over a million dollars a year. That's often the answer there to people like, oh,

Speaker:

if you tax the rich, they'll just leave, right? So that's your solution. And then it would

Speaker:

also give us the ability to issue warrants for their arrest on Interpol because then

Speaker:

they would be evading Canadian taxes and such like that. Where are you focused on policing?

Speaker:

So you start with defund the police at a minimum, right? Move a lot of the police budgets into

Speaker:

other areas that are better able to handle some of the jobs that the police do now that they're

Speaker:

not good at. You don't need a guy with a gun showing up at a medical emergency, for example.

Speaker:

Or somebody having a mental crisis and having like five policemen coming to your place because

Speaker:

the person is mentally unstable instead of bringing somebody that can, you know, bring a freaking

Speaker:

social worker. When like policemen all they have is a hammer and they treat everything

Speaker:

like if it's a nail. Well, you won't get any revolution with a well trained or well funded

Speaker:

police force, my friends. Well, they need to be trained differently. With the budget they

Speaker:

already have. Yeah, because a lot of progress like the NDP and a lot of progressives will

Speaker:

do this. They will. say that it's just kind of different training, that it's not a systemic

Speaker:

issue. Like they weren't here to create, like just to protect capital and further marginalize

Speaker:

people. Yeah, it's a systemic issue. Troy, you got to start with the first point. There's

Speaker:

two more. Save electoral reform for last. We have tax the rich. That's right. How can I

Speaker:

forget that one? Yeah. So as I brought up, there was the the wealth flight tax and then introducing

Speaker:

a larger income tax. But that's for just the rich, not the super wealthy, right? That's

Speaker:

not for Galen Weston Jr. The wealth flight tax is for Galen Weston Jr. So he can't just fuck

Speaker:

off to one of his Scottish castles. But in those cases, we want to have a scaling annual

Speaker:

wealth tax on billionaires. have on our website, we have a button called Eat the Rich, and

Speaker:

it is just a list of every Canadian billionaire. Oh, yeah, the wall of shame. Yeah, the wall

Speaker:

of shame. It starts with Elon Musk at the top, Galen Weston Jr. and everybody else. Because

Speaker:

Canadian billionaires are incredibly good at being quiet about how rich they are. Right.

Speaker:

They're very sneaky little bastards. Yeah, we don't celebrate them in the same way. No, we

Speaker:

don't. Right. Like they lay low. I dragons den we have. right or one of those shows has sharks

Speaker:

or something I don't know but they've got a show of their own but otherwise yes they have

Speaker:

a pretty Gaylen Weston just takes the hits for all of them Elon no one even remembers

Speaker:

he's Canadian so I thought that was funny he's kind of the first face just to remind people

Speaker:

we can't disown him like I'm like oh those crazy South Africans or Yankees it's like yeah

Speaker:

I'm own a little bit of this one because he's got the most money yeah and then We want to

Speaker:

also introduce a surtaxes on businesses where CEOs make more than 10 times their lowest paid

Speaker:

employee that can scale up to 100%. And that will just hopefully make a big difference in

Speaker:

the wealth or the income gap between minimum wage and well, Galen West and fucking junior.

Speaker:

Yeah. Matthew, do you want to talk about the last point there? Electoral reform is something

Speaker:

you folks talk a lot about. I get it. Yeah. Yeah, because one of the big problems that

Speaker:

we have in this country is something that's called strategic voting. I've never heard of

Speaker:

that. Oh my God. You never heard of that? Tell me, what is it? It forces Canada in picking

Speaker:

two parties that they literally hate. You have literally a bowl of shit and another bowl of

Speaker:

shit. Um, and basically it forces people only to choose for two parties because if you don't

Speaker:

choose for, uh, one party, you're going to help the other one win. And you get shamed for it

Speaker:

too. Yeah. And get shamed as well for it. Like if you say like, yeah, I decide to vote for

Speaker:

NDP because I believe in what they stand for. Oh no, you're helping the conservative to win

Speaker:

your writing or. Oh I'm going to vote for the Bloc because I'm a French person and I

Speaker:

don't like how my government is running in Ottawa and they never attend the needs of Quebec.

Speaker:

Oh, you're helping the conservatives win in Quebec. All of that. Look, any type of electoral

Speaker:

reform would be good. But apparently the one that we have is proportional voting. So that

Speaker:

way anybody can have a Anybody can have a voice. Most of the time, happens is that whoever's

Speaker:

in power, let's just say like if it's the liberals, the western part of the the country starts

Speaker:

being unhappy or start saying like, they're marginalizing us or they're not listening to

Speaker:

us. And if some of the conservative women then Quebec and the Maritimes starts yelling and

Speaker:

bickering, saying like, oh, nobody listens to us. Can I just say? Let's normalize not calling

Speaker:

Alberta the West. We are not the West. As a lifetime Albertan, we are Midwest at best.

Speaker:

Okay. That's too many categories for us. God, the separatism going on in Alberta right now.

Speaker:

can't handle it. It's like, can we all just be Turtle Island? Everyone I think can understand,

Speaker:

especially, there's already proponents for electoral reform. on the left. think that's a big sticking

Speaker:

point for a lot of people. Even liberals wanted it. I mean, it was what Trudeau promised and

Speaker:

originally brought him to power. want to know why Trudeau won his first election in Quebec?

Speaker:

Like why he was so why Quebec was so red when he when he started running? Why? Because one,

Speaker:

he's from a dynasty that was loved by the boomers in Quebec. And secondly, he introduced electoral

Speaker:

reform. He said that it was going to be the last election with electoral reform. He won,

Speaker:

he had 10 years to do it, he didn't do it. He sat on it and he said like, oh, it's too

Speaker:

hard, or the Senate. Look, he was in power and he knew that if he would have done electoral

Speaker:

reform, he would have hurt his own party, hurt the conservative, hurt Quebec, hurt all the

Speaker:

parties that... had like this big proportional group and help all the other smaller parties.

Speaker:

So no matter who's going to be to power, they don't want to kill. They don't want to shoot

Speaker:

themselves in the foot. They just don't want to do that. See, I would argue, yes, all that.

Speaker:

Yes. But the NDP for the same reason you folks understand how badly you need electoral reform

Speaker:

to make a greater impact. Like that must be just so friggin obvious, especially going

Speaker:

through a federal election, right? And seeing how hard it is to eat out space there. But

Speaker:

the NDP is threatened by parties like you. I mean, you've openly declared yourself as

Speaker:

a threat to the NDP, right? So your growth or your ability to get a foothold into the

Speaker:

electoral system with electoral reform is a threat. to the NDP, I'm not sure if they had

Speaker:

maintained themselves as the only leftist party in an actual leftist party, then yes, like

Speaker:

that would help the smaller parties. But the way that they've done it, there's so many

Speaker:

people ready to take up this position that you have where you're like, fine, we'll do it

Speaker:

ourselves. And under electoral reform, that becomes a lot more promising. So it's why

Speaker:

the NDP had never really fully put their shoulders into getting that done. Jagmeet even admitted

Speaker:

it was like he tried to get it as part of the supply agreement and you know, but it was

Speaker:

like half-hearted. It definitely wasn't a priority. And like this is coming from a party that

Speaker:

had already promised it. So you think it would have been an easy sell, but no, nobody ever

Speaker:

intended on really doing it. So I understand why that's like a cornerstone. of what you

Speaker:

folks are demanding because I mean, it'll help make all this work a little more worthwhile,

Speaker:

right? Maybe brighten the prospects. And it's just a more democratic way of doing things

Speaker:

as well. Like First Past the Post is inherently anti-democratic and we are very pro-democracy.

Speaker:

It's funny. Jamie says the same thing over and over and it's that he wishes the NDP would

Speaker:

steal our entire platform. I run on that, right? It's not that we as the revolution party of

Speaker:

Canada want to win. It's that we want our policies to win. want what we stand for to be what

Speaker:

gets put through what makes lives of Canadians better. Right. And if the fucking financier

Speaker:

ghouls behind the NDP have to fall for that, then yeah, absolutely. You know, maybe they

Speaker:

shouldn't be so set in their ways and thinking that, we have to keep moving towards the center

Speaker:

instead of further left like everybody wants. Well, I mean, if you can demonstrate success

Speaker:

or any other leftist institutions start to demonstrate success with a different strategy,

Speaker:

perhaps. I think a lot of them are just so wealthy in the institution that they've created

Speaker:

and the mechanisms now there are so anti-democratic that it's almost impossible for them to reform

Speaker:

themselves so that even if they did say you guys have great ideas and you're right it's

Speaker:

selling right like look at that look you're gaining traction i'll do this marketing plan

Speaker:

too right like because they don't actually believe like i'll it just it sells it keeps us relevant

Speaker:

that that's enough for us they're so poisoned in the way that they operate now that it's

Speaker:

really not healthy so how do you folks internally differ I don't know if any of you have been

Speaker:

inside the NDP to know how it might be different, but Troy says, you know, we believe in democracy

Speaker:

or, know, that is what we're about. How else does that manifest inside your party? Well,

Speaker:

we don't charge a membership fee. That's the biggest one. We do not charge a membership

Speaker:

fee for either regular members or candidates. There is no fees. Another big one is that we

Speaker:

will not be accepting donations at the federal limit. which I believe is $1,100 per person.

Speaker:

I mean, the talks that we've been having, we're thinking about like maybe $100 per person.

Speaker:

And even that is like, everybody's a little, ooh, that's a little high. We're trying to

Speaker:

get money out of the equation as much as possible. We understand that we're going to need money

Speaker:

to run. We fully understand that, but we don't want it to be the reason that we run, right?

Speaker:

We want the reason that we run to be making Canada better, making the lives of fellow Canadians

Speaker:

better. And, you know, hopefully being a bastion that the rest of the world looks to and goes,

Speaker:

hey, they did socialism and it's working. The other thing that I think of is you see in the

Speaker:

news, I'm seeing articles right now about how the NDP leadership is trying to like fix it

Speaker:

their way to get the candidate that they want to be leader as opposed to actually going to

Speaker:

the party. Everything we do is going to the party. There is no upper echelon of control.

Speaker:

Everything comes down to a vote like. all the policies, all the candidates are going to be

Speaker:

primaries. If there's more than one candidate, the leadership is going to be voted on just

Speaker:

right down at membership level. There isn't going to be any sort of centralized from the

Speaker:

top control. We're from the bottom up every time. Well, that is surely different than the

Speaker:

NDP who are highly centralized. Yeah. And also the NDP, you know, like they're doing their,

Speaker:

their, little leadership race right now. And I saw what you had to do and like the amount

Speaker:

of money. I don't think I have that amount of money. You're supposed to raise that amount

Speaker:

of money. It's a test of... It's to keep poor folks out. It's to keep grassroots candidates

Speaker:

out. But they'll tell you it's to test your prowess as a leader and part of politics to

Speaker:

them. most of the major, like all the major parties, is your ability to raise funds. So

Speaker:

surely these points set you apart in that regard. You talk about, you know, being happy, or at

Speaker:

least That's what Jamie said, but you folks nodded along there that if the NDP would just

Speaker:

take or, you know, help the ruling liberals took your platform. All right. Like let's just

Speaker:

take our fucking platform. Sure. Sure. How do you help folks get there? So what I mean

Speaker:

is where will your energy go between elections to make space or progress on things like the

Speaker:

three key points that you folks drove home there. You know, can start with electoral reform

Speaker:

or any of them. Like some of them are really kind of, radical ideas, they're revolutionary

Speaker:

ideas. They're not like things we haven't heard, but really right now there's no space for it

Speaker:

and you're not gonna be a majority party, right? And like that was one of the flaws I think

Speaker:

of the NDP's campaign at the beginning. They kind of shifted, but you know, we knew the

Speaker:

NDP wouldn't rule. and he kept speaking like that and I'll be honest your website reads

Speaker:

like that I would change it. The way you say we will do this we will do that like that's

Speaker:

so far off for you to be able to you know implement these policies. You need to explain to people

Speaker:

how you're going to get there without majority power. Right we needed to hear from the NDP

Speaker:

like here's how I'll behave with 24 seats. Unfortunately, in reality, he should have been

Speaker:

like, hey, even if you give us a dozen seats, here's what we can do with it. Here's what

Speaker:

we're going to do with your donations and your energy to make sure that the liberals don't

Speaker:

do X, Y, and Z. A lot of it is defense too at this point. And they don't mobilize people

Speaker:

to this end. So they don't get, we don't get any closer to electoral reform because They

Speaker:

don't do anything beyond say it on the floor. So what can you folks do even if you're not

Speaker:

on the floor, but you are taking the energy of folks, right? They still want to get to

Speaker:

that spot. How are you going to do that? I would think that especially at the beginning when

Speaker:

we're small, keeping the message out there, you talk about talking about it on the floor.

Speaker:

That's one thing, but talking about it in the community as well. The more that message gets

Speaker:

spread and the more people are talking about it, the more pressure that puts on even a majority

Speaker:

government and the more people are. protesting against things that they understand because

Speaker:

they've heard what we said or they're in the streets because they're fired up about something

Speaker:

that we said. There needs to be a bunch of us talking that all the time everywhere we can,

Speaker:

even if we don't have any power. Yeah, and in fewer words, we want to shift the Overton window

Speaker:

over towards the left where it's okay and expected to talk about these things where, the government

Speaker:

empowered the minority or majority will feel the pressure from people just talking about,

Speaker:

actually, I really do want a universal basic income. Why the hell does Galen Weston Jr.

Speaker:

have more money than anyone could ever spend in their single lifetime or even generations

Speaker:

of their family, right? I'm struggling to buy bread in the morning. I need a universal basic

Speaker:

income. But right now, that's not what people are talking about. The Overton window has shifted

Speaker:

further to the right than we really want it to be. The ideas are also out there, right?

Speaker:

So I imagine all of you, well, we've got Alberta, Niagara region here in Ontario, Montreal. So,

Speaker:

you know, fair vote Canada. not, I don't want to shade anyone working for them. I mean,

Speaker:

they're there, they're doing their thing. They're going for electoral reform. That's an example.

Speaker:

But I mean, some of the other issues that you folks talk about, and that you support. they're

Speaker:

being championed by people too already, right? Probably somewhere in your community. Are

Speaker:

you planning on working with them or amplifying their work or is there ways, you know, when

Speaker:

you say, I didn't kind of press you on it earlier, you used the term like be as grassroots as

Speaker:

possible. You're talking to a whole lot of like activists and organizers who know exactly

Speaker:

what it means to kind of work in their communities. What exactly is that going to kind of look

Speaker:

like from a party perspective? Right? So again, we'll kind of hate to compare you constantly,

Speaker:

but the parties generally operate with writing associations. Traditionally, those writing

Speaker:

associations just prepare for the next election. They might have some fundraisers here and there,

Speaker:

maybe a town hall to push the party messaging, right? Like if they're pushing on education.

Speaker:

They'll have education town halls and do what you're saying, kind of pull people in, have

Speaker:

them hear what they have to say, and hopefully that will draw them into the fold even further.

Speaker:

Do you have plans to kind of replicate that or, you know, the flip side I think is working

Speaker:

with organizations that are already doing the work that these ideas will naturally percolate

Speaker:

from? Yeah, so we are very intent on working with organizations. With everything that Jamie

Speaker:

has been doing as interim leader, he has been wildly busy and hard to get a hold of recently,

Speaker:

but I think he's been working with a lot of local communities across Ontario to just

Speaker:

get things going to show that, hey, we support this, we're a political party, we're going

Speaker:

to be an official political party, we support you and we want to see you go forward. In

Speaker:

my case, like I'm in a very deep blue riding. The moment it existed, became blue and it

Speaker:

has never been anything else. And I'm in Alberta, which itself is incredibly deep blue. I don't

Speaker:

think I'm going to win a seat from the Parkland riding, but at the very least I can talk to

Speaker:

people in my little city of Spruce Grove and say, hey, things can be better. We don't have

Speaker:

to just vote blue because they're the team that you play for, right? It's not a hockey game

Speaker:

anymore. Politics has never been a hockey game. Let's stop treating it like it is. We need

Speaker:

these things and we need them now, or we need them to be fought for. So in my case, my work

Speaker:

as a candidate between elections is very much going to be getting my name out there. Even

Speaker:

if it's potentially dangerous to me in some aspect or another, it feels like I have a moral

Speaker:

obligation to stand up for the revolution party where nobody else would. I'll say too with

Speaker:

the coalition building with all the other groups out there that are doing this work, we've already

Speaker:

reached out to a bunch of them. We're planning to reach out to as many as we can. And one

Speaker:

of the things that we have as well is we're seeking power to actually influence change

Speaker:

from within the government. Whereas they're more just about getting the message out. I

Speaker:

know I just talked about the importance of getting the message out, especially when we're new,

Speaker:

if we have any power, but it's a good mix. I belong to other organizations that were just

Speaker:

about like trying to spread awareness and trying to endorse candidates, things like that. And

Speaker:

I got frustrated because it didn't feel like there was any attempt to actually gain power

Speaker:

to effect change. And that's one of the things we're trying to do here eventually. you think

Speaker:

great change will come through the ballot box? I don't think it's impossible. I talked about

Speaker:

an upwards loop not that long ago. I think that could be the way it goes. I'm not a wizard

Speaker:

or anything, but it's possible. If people really feel like they're getting behind what we're

Speaker:

trying to push for, we could see success in the ballot box, right? But before then we have

Speaker:

to put, we really have to put the heat under the pants of the NDP before they are completely

Speaker:

dissolved, for example, or we have to talk to Bloch-Quebec-Oise because, you know, they're

Speaker:

the next highest seats. We have to do everything that we can to affect change. in the ways

Speaker:

that we are able to, which currently is not federally. And I think that is something that

Speaker:

we have to accept is that we don't currently have the power to make federal change, but

Speaker:

we can run municipal candidates or we can run provincial candidates. That's mainly down to

Speaker:

individuals more than the party right now. Until after our inaugural caucus, we're not

Speaker:

planning on anything relating to like organizations or any provincial party organizations. Sorry.

Speaker:

We're primarily focused on the federal party right now, but once the inaugural caucus is

Speaker:

set up and we're off to the races with the federal, we might start thinking about provincial presences.

Speaker:

Don't stretch yourselves too thin, folks. I do that too often. Where could you use the

Speaker:

most help? I want to say getting yourself registered as a party. Like there's probably bureaucratic.

Speaker:

items that y'all need to take care of, but are there, are you doing a good job of drawing

Speaker:

resources from all these folks that have found you, whether through boots or because of the

Speaker:

campaigns that were run during this last federal election? Where are you putting these people

Speaker:

and where do you still need help? I'm going to say that as of yet, we're not doing it well.

Speaker:

We need to have 90 % of the the country covered. So we need more candidates. We're doing good.

Speaker:

Like we have 50, around 50, we're getting close to 50. The volunteers are also going to be

Speaker:

a big help because they're going to help those candidates knock on doors, getting those

Speaker:

grassroots, getting that word out, getting that message out. I think those are the two

Speaker:

most impactful help that we can get. Matthew kind of gave like a kind of broad overview

Speaker:

of like the the things you need most is candidates and volunteers. But there are a lot of things

Speaker:

to do, right? Social media to run meetings, you're building a caucus, so there's administrative

Speaker:

things that have happened. Do you have a lot of these positions filled or are you still

Speaker:

looking to grow that core? I know you're not centralized, but you need people to take responsibility

Speaker:

to organize folks across the country like that, right? So we're, we're looking, we're looking

Speaker:

for people for doing that. We're looking for the people on the back end. We're looking for

Speaker:

that, for, for that core, uh, somebody for social media. We have candidates that have

Speaker:

position like that, but candidates also have to run their campaigns. They also have to get

Speaker:

their message out there. So They can't always do that job. Like I think even one of our candidates

Speaker:

is the one that's going to put our website in French eventually when that gets done. Yeah.

Speaker:

And he's a candidate by the way, like my one is a candidate. Um, even I'm helping him with

Speaker:

the French version and, and, and, and yeah, like we, we need volunteers to be in that

Speaker:

backend and to fill out those roles. So the candidate can actually just. think on running,

Speaker:

getting the message out there and knocking on doors and getting those grassroots support.

Speaker:

Yeah, like in my case, I'm a member of both our marketing and social media teams where

Speaker:

we're currently waiting for the messaging team to kind of get themselves together because

Speaker:

we're very intrinsically connected with the messaging of the party. We don't want to be

Speaker:

releasing videos where one of us is just like. You know what? I actually don't like universal

Speaker:

basic income all that much, but here's why the party likes it. We have to make sure that we're

Speaker:

very consistent in that. And right now, to be a hundred percent honest, we are a chaotic

Speaker:

mess. Like right after the election happened, we kind of, we saw a huge influx of people

Speaker:

that we just were not ready to take on at that time. And since then we have been a hundred

Speaker:

percent focused on organization because we are so disorganized. is kind of wild. So we have

Speaker:

teams coming together for a party organization. We have teams coming together for the shadow

Speaker:

cabinet. We have teams coming together for the inaugural caucus, for social media, stuff like

Speaker:

that. We're getting there, but it's a slow process, right? We're trying to make sure that everybody

Speaker:

is okay with what we're doing because we're not a one person party. We're not built from

Speaker:

the top down. We're built from the bottom up. So we got to make sure everybody standing at

Speaker:

the bottom or sitting at the bottom is okay holding everybody else up. We've all been

Speaker:

there as organizers, right? Where there's been these moments where everything that we've done

Speaker:

is doing what it's supposed to do, but we still weren't ready for it. You like you peek, you

Speaker:

get a lot of engagement, you stir a lot of people's interest, and then how you capture and hold

Speaker:

that interest, it's hard to onboard people effectively. So that was part of my question.

Speaker:

like all these skill sets that you need to run a party in whatever way that you're gonna

Speaker:

do, they're gonna come from all of these people that saw you through a boots video or saw one

Speaker:

of your candidates and they're gonna have this secret superpower that you didn't even know

Speaker:

you needed. But you do, you know, like someone who knows how to get signs and frozen ground,

Speaker:

you know, it's just like a silly example, but. You know, in your core group, there'll be

Speaker:

so many skill sets, video editing and all these things. So yeah, get your shit together people

Speaker:

because yeah, you've got a lot of excited people that, you know, want to put their energy here

Speaker:

and you could do really great things as long as you kind of are able to multiply that

Speaker:

power, right? Like a volunteer isn't a volunteer until they have a task, right? Yeah. As a

Speaker:

D &D DM, the way that I'm looking at it is currently we're building the paddock that we're

Speaker:

going to herd all the cats into. We're in this political time where the liberals are going

Speaker:

to do everything the conservatives wanted to do anyway, except for maybe attack trans health

Speaker:

care and a few other social items. So I think we're far off from another election, federal

Speaker:

election. So you folks have breathing space to create your caucus. the paddock, all the

Speaker:

infrastructure you're going to need. May I suggest you talk to people who have been in

Speaker:

the thick of it, like Matthew, Matthew with the Solidair, Quebec Solidair, and folks who've

Speaker:

gone through the wringer with the NDP and find out where the pitfalls are as you start to

Speaker:

really solidify that core. Yeah, there's, there's quite a few of us who are like really hoping.

Speaker:

that with the NDP currently imploding, we're going to start seeing some NDP candidates just

Speaker:

kind of, you know, quietly shuffle over. So, oh, some candidates, yeah. You know, you got

Speaker:

some MPs who lost their seat. I think a lot of them are hanging out in the wings to see

Speaker:

how this leadership thing takes place. you do, what you do have out there are people who

Speaker:

have run these little mini infrastructures, even though they're kind of colonial structures

Speaker:

and they're not all that healthy. That are just done like entire writing associations

Speaker:

have walked away, know the people in that run them I've just walked away from the NDP entirely.

Speaker:

They've been treasurer. They've been social media managers They've run campaigns. They

Speaker:

you know me clipboards I have you know, like I have all kind I have everything you need

Speaker:

over in that little corner to run a fucking political campaign including a bunch of buttons

Speaker:

with my name on it, know what I thought I never want to see again, so you These people will

Speaker:

come and help you build but they need to know you are different from the NDP So yeah, like

Speaker:

I love you named a few things democratically that make you stand out Policy wise I think

Speaker:

it was kind of obvious to folks I mean deep down the NDP would advocate for some of these

Speaker:

things It is deep in the policy book and and and members hearts But to get somebody to say

Speaker:

it on camera is another thing. mean, before we started recording, we were talking about

Speaker:

their refusal to say like sex work is work when someone tries to shame them for having an OnlyFans

Speaker:

model on their bus and doing promos for them. So they're a long way away and you folks

Speaker:

are definitely distinguishing yourself. You know, like throwing somebody under the bus

Speaker:

with the NDP did that was horrible. And our party is never going to do that. Yeah. Well,

Speaker:

you might, but you got to have mechanisms in place to be able to hold people accountable.

Speaker:

It's like just like our politics where, you know, it's like four years, cross your fingers,

Speaker:

maybe sign a petition or two or whatnot, but otherwise no recourse. That is another problem

Speaker:

within the NDP that no one is answerable to the members. really to make those decisions.

Speaker:

someone does make a bad decision, a bad call on the campaign. You can't go to the party

Speaker:

for everything on the fly, right? There, some people will make bad decisions as leaders,

Speaker:

as people in key positions. It's how you folks deal with those mistakes that is going to set

Speaker:

you apart as well. Because even the Communist Party of Canada had issues. It's probably why,

Speaker:

you know, Kira even had this kind of disclaimer on her experience as a lesbian within the

Speaker:

group, right? Because there's there's been institutions where shit happens that is a

Speaker:

microcosm of the greater society. And the circle that exists around partisan politics

Speaker:

closes ranks and don't deal with it. And these aren't healthy places for people like us. We're

Speaker:

already considering a system in which the members can in adequate circumstances, just remove

Speaker:

a candidate from the party. Not necessarily as a member, just get them out. Get them off

Speaker:

of the spotlight, get them out of candidacy and put somebody else in who will do a better

Speaker:

job of it. It's so necessary. You said it yourself, things are going to happen. The big question

Speaker:

that I've always asked is when things happen, what do you do about it? It's a zero tolerance

Speaker:

thing where if somebody is openly against one of our policies or policies that members have

Speaker:

voted on because we've also been completely open to members introducing policies. We didn't

Speaker:

actually have anything relating to disability until somebody came in and was like, hey, you

Speaker:

guys really need to focus a lot on disability. And everybody was like, oh, yeah, actually

Speaker:

we do. I'm the one that pushed that. And like people have been individually coming in. have

Speaker:

a channel on our server where people can suggest policy. We've gotten so many really good policy

Speaker:

suggestions that we're going to be looking at during the inaugural caucus. There's all these

Speaker:

things that we can do. There are ideas that people have already, right? That I'm never

Speaker:

going to have, that Troy is never going to have, that Mathieu is never going to have, but we're

Speaker:

always trying to be open to those ideas. Yeah. Like, like, like if I ever do a town hall,

Speaker:

I'm going to ask two people, so what are your grievance right now? Like, Where's your pain?

Speaker:

How can I help you? Because even if I win my writing, I'm still going to have those down

Speaker:

holes and I'm still going to see like, I'm still going to want to see my candidates. Not my

Speaker:

candidate, but the constituents. I'm not going to do like, oh, I won this writing and I know

Speaker:

that I'm safe into it. I'm just going to disappear and not appear into any debate or anything

Speaker:

like that. I'm just going to disappear and... at Ottawa and say goodbye, say or no. I cannot

Speaker:

imagine willingly doing that while also getting paid $180,000 a year. Right. When you become

Speaker:

an MP and you have an income like that, you should be doing everything in your power to

Speaker:

talk to your constituents, right? Because they voted you in. You have to keep up to date on

Speaker:

what they want from you. Right. You can't just be like, hey, my assistant is handling all

Speaker:

of my emails. I occasionally see one or two. I'm mostly disconnected because I work in Ottawa.

Speaker:

What are the things that I got from the Atlantic regional communists who are on a similar path

Speaker:

as you folks, but less interested in electoral victories or even electoral work at the moment?

Speaker:

But one of the things that I admired about how they were going to build, you know, the

Speaker:

antithesis of what they had experienced so far. was like what you say, you know, should I

Speaker:

become an MP to be held accountable to be in constant contact? That's how they structured

Speaker:

their party within to write. anyone holding the treasurer position or all these other kind

Speaker:

of key roles, I know you don't want to be centralized, but again, there's going to be key roles that

Speaker:

need to be filled. They'll have to make decisions sometimes without the party, but creating

Speaker:

mechanisms where they were constantly constantly having to answer to the larger mass, right?

Speaker:

The larger, the membership. So volunteers, candidates, all on equal footing at that point and being

Speaker:

able to ask hard questions of the decisions that had been made, right? But it's one thing

Speaker:

to have it as a mantra, you say out loud, you know, this is how we're going to be and we're

Speaker:

not or not going to be, but it's finding what the actual mechanisms are, what that structure

Speaker:

looks like, what those meetings end up unfolding like to make sure that it remains democratic,

Speaker:

that it remains linear or decentralized even, right? So it'd be interesting. I would like

Speaker:

to check in with you folks perhaps a year from now. Uh, and see the hiccups that you'll

Speaker:

end up having to go through, how you manage them and you know, what, how much closer

Speaker:

you folks are to realizing, you know, ideal outcomes there. By then we'll have had our,

Speaker:

con our initial, um, uh, inaugural, inaugural caucus. Caucus. We'll have a lot of things

Speaker:

more sorted out by then. We'll have a lot more of the organization in place. Touching in again.

Speaker:

great. we will have a real group of leaders, not just interns. Well, you know, you talk

Speaker:

about term limits too. So rotation, rotation. Remember, the Greeks used to pull lots, right?

Speaker:

So it's like, Troy, you are the treasurer this year. And, you know, like it's there's all

Speaker:

sorts of ways you can structure yourself to make it fair and equitable and whatnot. It's

Speaker:

quite the adventure to start from scratch. Right. And you're going to be wrong. You're going

Speaker:

to do something you wish you hadn't. and you'll learn from it but what a roller coaster it's

Speaker:

going to be building a party like this I hope you know the audience here is your target audience

Speaker:

so in terms of getting your word out I may not have the reach of boots right because he's

Speaker:

done a lot for you folks that that is great to hear I hope you've kind of told him that

Speaker:

I'm sure you have but Yeah, we'll get you some a little bit of reach too. And in the show

Speaker:

notes, folks can see how they can get in touch with the party and volunteer or just start

Speaker:

to find out more about them. Any parting words, folks? We'll just we'll start with Kira. God,

Speaker:

I hope we get something. You know, I hope that something comes of this, because as Troy

Speaker:

said much earlier on in the show, there have been so many examples of somebody or a party

Speaker:

trying to be left and just not doing well enough, right? We need something. That's why I want

Speaker:

people to steal the damn platform. Just give us something. Give me anything. Yeah. I'll

Speaker:

do my best, friend. I'll do my best, comrade. Matthew. Me? Join the revolution. Come and

Speaker:

speak to us. We're not a close party. We take criticism from everybody. Even if it hurts

Speaker:

us. We even took criticism from a Steve Boots video, like in the comments, basically. And

Speaker:

I also heard also some right wingers actually criticizing us. And some of them were valid.

Speaker:

no, mean, like, seriously, sometimes just hearing how what people have to say actually helps

Speaker:

and we're going to take criticism where it is. And we're going to adjust. Gotta figure it

Speaker:

out somehow. We're new at this. Thank you, folks, for joining us and sharing that brutal honesty

Speaker:

too I love from from Kira that it was just like it's High chaos. I wrote it down on my

Speaker:

notes there and I know that feeling. I absolutely know that feeling. It is. I'm getting a buzz

Speaker:

from it over here. I can, I know what you guys are going through. I wish you a world of luck.

Speaker:

I will be checking in with you. I find this very intriguing and I'm sure the audience did

Speaker:

as well. So thank you very much. That is a wrap on another episode of Blueprints of Disruption.

Speaker:

Thank you for joining us. Blueprints of Disruption is an independent production operated cooperatively.

Speaker:

You can follow us on Twitter at BPofDisruption. If you'd like to help us continue disrupting

Speaker:

the status quo, please share our content. And if you have the means, consider becoming a

Speaker:

patron. Not only does our support come from the progressive community, so does our content.

Speaker:

So reach out to us and let us know what or who we should be amplifying. So until next time,

Speaker:

keep disrupting.