There is so much out there to get mad about. Social injustices, class warfare, continued
Speaker:colonization, the act of destruction of our planet by those focused on prophets and not
Speaker:people. We can find it overwhelming at times. The good news is there are equally as many,
Speaker:if not more, stories of people coming together and rising up against the forces at play. So
Speaker:the creators of Blueprints of Disruption have added a new weekly segment, Ravel Rants, where
Speaker:we will unpack the stories that have us most riled up, share calls to action, and most importantly,
Speaker:celebrate resistance. Someone tweeted out today, has the Canadian media gone into some sort
Speaker:of meltdown mode? And I totally was feeling that. This last week has just been particularly
Speaker:enraging. Like I know we've talked in the last since October 7th. We have talked many, many
Speaker:times before that. Well before that, our frustrations with mainstream media and forced narratives
Speaker:and manufactured consent. But like this last week has been something else. So there's a
Speaker:few cases that particularly demonstrate the absurdity, maybe the desperation. that's on
Speaker:display in order to justify what we're seeing in Gaza. Because in the end, all of the arguments
Speaker:that happen, I feel they're all part of that justification. And we're going to get into
Speaker:that as we go through this week's rant. But yeah, there's a few figures within the Canadian
Speaker:media and just the political scene in general that have particularly drawn my ire. I'm going
Speaker:to start with the most ridiculous because it really pissed me off and even like my family
Speaker:doesn't often hear about my Twitter interactions. But when Warren Consilla came out, this is
Speaker:a former advisor to Jean Cratchani, a liberal advisor, he thinks he's something else, he
Speaker:tweets out and writes a column to go along with it. that says anybody at the pro-Palestinian
Speaker:rally that particular weekend should either be deported if they weren't citizens of Canada
Speaker:or arrested. We're talking about tens of thousands of people in city centers and even smaller
Speaker:towns, like across Canada, and that's the literal definition of fucking fascism. Because that
Speaker:isn't even like common opinion. Right? We know three out of four Canadians actually don't
Speaker:even agree with the Israeli apartheid. So this is strictly the opinion of the very, very top.
Speaker:Right now it looks like Justin Trudeau and his closest friends, to be honest. But, and if
Speaker:you don't agree with them, if you bother to stand out in the street and speak against them,
Speaker:you have media pundits and political advisors calling for mass arrests. And this isn't to
Speaker:be dis- This isn't to dismiss these folks, like when I make fun of who he really is and the
Speaker:fact that Ben Mulrooney backed him up. It's happening. An organizer in Calgary has been
Speaker:arrested by police and charged with disrupting the peace for leading a chant, the chant that
Speaker:we talk about many, many times now, from the river to the sea, Palestine will be free. And
Speaker:not just disrupting the peace, they've added a hate motivation charge. So like these kinds
Speaker:of narratives that these folks are printing out there are happening. They're being realized.
Speaker:And that is fucking fascism. But, you know, on the good side of that story, even after
Speaker:Warren Consilla deleted his tweet, obviously he was feeling the heat on that one because
Speaker:it was just unquestionably awful. So xenophobic as well to go back to the deport them, right?
Speaker:They don't agree with Canadian values. Deport them. And it's some white man in an office
Speaker:deciding what Canadian values are. But Ben Mulrooney, for folks that don't know, you know, this is
Speaker:Brian Mulrooney's son, part of the Canadian empire of brown envelopes stuffed with cash
Speaker:from capitalists. He doubles down on this shit over and over again, to the point where he's
Speaker:lost his ambassadorship with the CNIB, the Canadian National Institute for the Blind. So, you know,
Speaker:cancel culture strikes again. But this stuff just reverberates. Like you have prominent,
Speaker:I say that, e-news talk fame, but semi-prominent people openly calling for fascist solutions
Speaker:to dissent. And yeah, it's that and what we're seeing from a lot of other groups is just creating
Speaker:this atmosphere where it's impossible to talk about this constructively. without having to
Speaker:deflect all of these ridiculous claims on top of it, right? And these sidetrack issues that
Speaker:really, I think, just serve to remove Palestinian voices from the conversation, right? Look to
Speaker:like center anything else but what's happening to the people in Gaza. Right. Here's the good
Speaker:news is I think that is a sign that they've lost control of the narrative. fully, right?
Speaker:They're going into these fascist tactics for a reason, because they can see, you know, like,
Speaker:how many people showed up in Toronto this weekend? I don't even know what the number is. No one
Speaker:can give us an accurate number ever. A shit ton of people is what it was. Yeah. You know,
Speaker:I'm seeing, you know, I'm overhearing conversations as I walk through the streets, where I'm hiring
Speaker:people. talk about how, oh, like they didn't know anything about this issue, and they've
Speaker:gone and they've read and they're concerned about this and they're concerned. They're like,
Speaker:oh, but like, Israel's clearly the one with all the power here. So they're like, you know,
Speaker:this oppression of the Palestinians, that can't be right. What's going on? Literal conversations
Speaker:I'm hearing on streetcars, you know, like I'm seeing Palestinian pins everywhere. I'm seeing,
Speaker:like in my day to day walk, and I mean, that's my anecdotal experience. And I know that that's
Speaker:what that like that. Anecdotal is what anecdotal is. But my point being like, you're seeing
Speaker:on mass the narrative shift away from, from what it was in the first few weeks, from what
Speaker:the major sources of information have been trying, the narrative that they've been trying to craft
Speaker:and they've been left with nothing but to try these fascist tactics to try and regain it.
Speaker:Oh, we're just not going to let you say this. We're gonna start arresting people. We're gonna
Speaker:strike fear in you. Well, I wanna make you feel a little better. It's not just anecdotal. That
Speaker:might be your anecdote from the week, what you've heard, but Toronto wasn't an isolated situation.
Speaker:The Prime Minister of England told them, don't you dare use arms to stay, Remembrance Day,
Speaker:to protest. Don't you dare come to our streets on Veterans Day. And surely almost a million
Speaker:people did. So just like we're trying to figure out if that was the largest protest Toronto's
Speaker:ever seen on November 12th, November 11th saw something unimaginable in London, again, we
Speaker:said it on the show, this is repeated in many, many cities. Like I spent, I felt like all
Speaker:day yesterday just retweeting people from different cities around Canada and their shots of how
Speaker:big the crowd was. Even I was in Barrie and I'd say that there was about a hundred people
Speaker:there and this started, the first time I went to Barrie for this, it was like 12th. And he...
Speaker:there was more than 12 flags this time. And it's not just anecdotal. More people are learning
Speaker:about the occupation and apartheid. More people are understanding what Zionism is and the actual
Speaker:goals of Israel. These conversations are happening, but just not in the most prominent spaces.
Speaker:But it doesn't matter. They're still taking foot. I'm going to center on a word there,
Speaker:apartheid, because I had a recent realization, I guess, that people aren't as familiar with
Speaker:the concept of apartheid as I believe they would be. It happened several times where, you know,
Speaker:I've been discussing apartheid and someone's like, what's apartheid? Or, you know, like
Speaker:people were asking, like, what does that mean? What is that word? And you know, when you explain
Speaker:it to people, they're like, oh, that's bad. Because I think that like, based on like, you
Speaker:know, like the things that we've been taught and the thing, you know, like, you know, you
Speaker:know, slavery bad and all these things. And like, you know, people, people look at apartheid
Speaker:and, you know, most people get it. Oh, that's not the world that we want to build. And it's
Speaker:part of the reason why they've made such an effort to, to not have that be part of the
Speaker:narrative. Oh yeah. Because I asked you when you told me this, do they not teach apartheid
Speaker:in school? And I'm so old, it's been so long since I've been in school. And my family taught
Speaker:me about South Africa and apartheid. And Santiago, we're like, no, like, of course not. We can't
Speaker:be showing Canadian children the model, right? Like, because they're going to draw too many
Speaker:parallels between our history and apartheid. And even when we had Chris Ramp's groups on
Speaker:justice for migrant workers, I mean, he was able to make the very strong argument that
Speaker:what those folks are experiencing is a form of apartheid. So. But I would love to see,
Speaker:and actually we could look it up now, but I probably won't, the trends of terms. So how
Speaker:often are people now looking up apartheid versus what they were doing 40 days ago? Israeli occupation,
Speaker:like certain phrases that we needed in the narrative a long time ago are catching fire. now. And
Speaker:there's no putting this back in the box. We can talk about people having short-term memory
Speaker:loss when it comes to politics, but this is something else. This is another one of those
Speaker:global collective traumas that we've experienced because we've watched what's happening firsthand
Speaker:to the people of Palestine. And so there's no erasing those images from people's minds ever
Speaker:again. You can then repackage it afterwards if that's possible. I just don't think you'll
Speaker:have the political capital to do that anywhere. But... Even if you do try, this is something
Speaker:else. This isn't something you could rewrite now thanks to the reach of social media and
Speaker:whatnot. But I want to go back into that desperation that we're seeing, right? The stuff that really
Speaker:kind of got me pissed off this week centered on what you see in social media. And that has
Speaker:a huge impact. And in particular, CJA. That is the... Center for Israeli and Jewish Affairs,
Speaker:they sent out two really awful tweets that had the fingerprints of actually being manipulated
Speaker:and surely, blatantly, I can say with confidence, were completely misrepresented with purpose,
Speaker:with malice. So the first one, I'm sure we've all seen protesters confronting one another
Speaker:at Concordia University, fully showing everyone's face, tried to dox her, saying she said one
Speaker:word. Other people say she said another word. I can't repeat either of the words on here,
Speaker:but there's no attempt to verify. It's just immediately sent out with the most sensationalist
Speaker:purposes, and we've seen that they've taken down that tweet after considerable heed and
Speaker:pushback. But I think the worst one was just so obvious, so reeked of desperation and manipulation,
Speaker:and completely designed to stoke fear into the Jewish community that they claim to represent.
Speaker:They took a video of protesters outside of an Ontario high school. that were clearly chanting
Speaker:a chant we've all heard at every rally in the last 30 days, Trudeau Trudeau, you can't hide,
Speaker:we'll charge you with genocide. And they put it out there and said, and put the caption
Speaker:as though the students were saying, Judah, you can't hide, we will charge you with genocide.
Speaker:And I can't verify this, but to my ear, it sounded like it was even sped up the audio. And even
Speaker:with that sped up or manipulated sound, it was still clear to me what they were saying. And
Speaker:again, they take this tweet down, but only after all these sensationalist claims that we've
Speaker:seen around war, which, you know, this war, or we can't call this war, around this conflict,
Speaker:like all conflicts, it goes out there. There's no putting it back in the box again. Even the
Speaker:retractions come so quietly, like in this case, they just deleted the tweet. There was no acknowledgement
Speaker:that they completely manipulated the situation. And so you go from students actually targeting
Speaker:a liberal prime minister, a valid target of a chant, a person you could actually charge
Speaker:with war crimes, to making it look like a mob of students hunting down Jews. But that is
Speaker:a huge difference. This framing of all of these rallies as being against Jewish people, that's
Speaker:inciting so much fear in the Jewish community. So I do not deny when the Jesse Browns out
Speaker:there say, you know, your Jewish neighbours are not doing well. Like they're, you know,
Speaker:someone firebombed a fucking synagogue and you've got a Jewish school in Montreal that has been
Speaker:shot at twice. So There is already fear within the Jewish community who has already experienced
Speaker:hate crimes and antisemitism for generations. But then you have Sijah who's tasked with fighting
Speaker:this antisemitism, making shit up. That's making it worse. And then it's de-validating all the
Speaker:work that genuinely goes into fighting antisemitism. to pointing it out within our very own movement
Speaker:because it exists. You know, it's not black or white. It's not like, oh, this movement
Speaker:isn't anti-Semitic. It isn't at its core, but that's not to say there aren't anti-Semites
Speaker:within it, but to then conflate these legitimate targets like a prime minister or a Zionist
Speaker:business and say to the Jewish community that you have so much influence over, right? That
Speaker:you get your newsletter, you're prominent in their eyes, and you tell them, that actually
Speaker:all of this means they hate you, knowing that that's not actually what's happening. I can't
Speaker:help but feel that that's inciting the most amount of fear around this. Because if you're
Speaker:in those rallies, you don't experience, nobody brings the Jewish people into discussion unless
Speaker:they are there asserting themselves as Jews against genocide, for example. I've not heard
Speaker:one speech, I've not heard personally one chant ever. that has been directed at Jewish people
Speaker:whatsoever. And in fact, if you showed up to a pro-Palestinian rally with your kippah on,
Speaker:with obvious Jewishness, right? A sign that identifies you as, or whatever, you would be
Speaker:so warmly welcomed, you know, if you weren't waving an Israeli flag in their face while
Speaker:they're committing genocide. You know, like that is not an unwelcome space for Jewish people
Speaker:and anybody from the Jewish organizations that have been part of these actions. Can you tell
Speaker:you that? So I'm very upset with Sijah right now. I mean, these are the same people who
Speaker:were absolutely relentless in their pursuit of Sarah Jemma. Right? Like they focused in
Speaker:on her, but yet tweet out today that the harassment Canadian politicians who support Israel are
Speaker:facing is unacceptable. That that is some sort of violence. They've lost all legitimacy. CJ
Speaker:is one of those organizations that you look at and you're like, oh yeah, you were operating
Speaker:in absolute bad faith. Like they know exactly what they're doing, you know. There's no, um,
Speaker:oh, there's been misunderstandings or, you know, like, no, they, they're, they're a propaganda
Speaker:machine. You know, their, their goal is to get people behind the Israeli... war crimes, occupation,
Speaker:genocide, apartheid of the Palestinians. And, you know, this is something, you know, nothing
Speaker:new under the sun, but this is something you see in wars. And I feel that we're as the public
Speaker:were not really prepared enough for this kind of propaganda. You know, it's something, you
Speaker:know, you see it constantly. You saw how. In 9-11, people, after 9-11, people were afraid.
Speaker:And how many people used that fear to justify all kinds of horrible things that were really
Speaker:just personal agendas, mainly for capital purposes, right? CJ is weaponizing fear. And there's
Speaker:always people to weaponize fear. And it's really hard to... Like for the people who they're
Speaker:trying to weaponize their fear, it's really hard to make yourself immune to that when you're
Speaker:afraid, when you actively are afraid, when you're actively are concerned, when you're in these
Speaker:emotionally vulnerable states, it's really hard to shield yourself from those effects. And
Speaker:I find that just the lack of concern over this. It's quite telling of something, right? Because,
Speaker:you know, CJA has no accountability. There's nobody holding them accountable. Just like
Speaker:last few years, people have been screaming about Russian propaganda and Russian interference
Speaker:in Canadian politics. Meanwhile, you have an organization that really, like legitimately
Speaker:is a propaganda arm of the Israeli state operating with impunity in Canada. No accountability.
Speaker:Let me just back that up a little bit. Sorry, let me just back that up a little bit because...
Speaker:Dave Gray Donald posted an excellent thread on Twitter that gave the history of Sija and
Speaker:how it was started by Heather Reisman. And we're going to go back to Heather because she's the
Speaker:founder of Indigo. So when we talk about a Jewish-owned bookstore, Jesse Brown says Jewish-owned bookstore,
Speaker:it makes you think like a mom and pop shop, right? Is vandalized. And in fact, he's talking
Speaker:about indigo books. Heather Reisman basically founded CJA in a knee-jerk reaction response
Speaker:to a protest where Netanyahu was unable to speak at an event because students made it so. And
Speaker:they understood that they needed to do a little, a lot more Israeli propaganda here in Canada,
Speaker:that there was a lot of work to do. And so they created CJA. A lot of folks have described
Speaker:it as a hostile takeover of the Canadian Jewish Congress, which was a democratic body, had
Speaker:elections, and was designed to represent the interests of Jewish people in Canada, right?
Speaker:And whatever that means. Even in the name itself, the Center for Israeli and Jewish Affairs.
Speaker:Canada isn't even in the name. And these, again, these are points that David Graydonnell brought
Speaker:up in his thread.
Speaker:So yeah, they don't even pretend to represent Canadian interests. They are secretive about
Speaker:their budget, what it is and where a lot of it comes from. And we do know that they spend
Speaker:like tens of millions of dollars alone just in reiterating Israeli propaganda, almost line
Speaker:by line with the ruling party over there. And So, Santiago isn't just generalizing. There's
Speaker:history there, where they have taken what should have been Jewish interests here in Canada and
Speaker:centered it now on Israeli, and have intrinsically tied those two together as though they're one
Speaker:in the same. And we've spent considerable time here on the show talking, especially with Jeremy
Speaker:Appel, on how Judaism and Zionism are not one in the same. And that is the prominent voice
Speaker:now here in Canada when the media or let's say the Toronto District School Board, for example,
Speaker:are looking for prominent voices, authoritarian voices on what anti-Semitism is. These are
Speaker:the people that they're going to. And that's a huge problem. Yeah. And one more thing about
Speaker:like, you know, when I say they're operating bad faith. You know, and I say this as someone,
Speaker:you know, like I'm learning all the journalistic ethics and everything, you know, seizure operates
Speaker:in a way that's a very much like, with an awareness that the first lie is the one that sticks,
Speaker:you know, they, they post knee jerk, you know, reactionary shit immediately, such as, you
Speaker:know, the, the whole claim of Judah, you can't hide, you know, like they delete it. later.
Speaker:But they know that doesn't really matter. You know, it doesn't really matter that they delete
Speaker:it, you know, they're not somebody who has to respond to elections or accountability of any
Speaker:kind, right? So people are still going to remember that and believe that, you know, and there's
Speaker:people who trust this organization, who trust that this organization is looking out for their
Speaker:interests. They're taking advantage of that. And they're taking advantage of like the human
Speaker:psychology and the way even how social media works. Right. Like you can see how many people
Speaker:would share that video, be like, look at this. But how many people are going to share a tweet
Speaker:that mentions that someone deleted a tweet. Right. Like that's not as sensational. That
Speaker:is not going to get the same algorithm. Because right now, you know. whenever there's times
Speaker:of wars, people are faced and this happens on mass, like everyone's faced with like this
Speaker:uncomfortableness because we, many of us hold like different levels of humanitarian values
Speaker:and such. And then war calls into question all of our values, you know? And if, if you're
Speaker:buying into, you know, one side or the other, whatever, you know, buying into the idea of
Speaker:war in general, like, you're going to have this rationalization to make, right? And so you're,
Speaker:prowl for any information to help you soothe that discomfort, right? So you see something
Speaker:like this and it's like, oh, hey, oh, see, see that thing. See, my concerns are valid, you
Speaker:know. And so, like, it's incredibly powerful. It's an incredibly effective and powerful thing.
Speaker:See, that's why I avoid though, like I've come across plenty of videos. plenty of infographics
Speaker:that show the most horrific actions by Israeli soldiers. I mean, I don't share graphic content
Speaker:pretty much ever because I don't know who's in my feed that's going to be triggered by
Speaker:it. If I consumed it, that's enough. It's for other people to decide whether they consume
Speaker:that. But I purposely, purposely try not to share things that enraged me so much because...
Speaker:You can never really even verify a lot of these videos when they were taken. I am not an expert
Speaker:at identifying soldier uniforms or any of that, right? And so I don't know. And I know that
Speaker:the hate and the rage that it actually generated in me in that moment need not be replicated.
Speaker:That there are enough facts that I know to be true, enough historical context to provide
Speaker:to prove that. the Israeli Zionist government is illegitimate, that the occupation is illegal
Speaker:and oppressive. Because by sharing shit like that, you're purposely stoking just pure anger
Speaker:and you're not even directing it, right? It's not like you have a group of people, you're
Speaker:making a speech, you have a call to action at the end and you're like, and see, I need you
Speaker:to know how bad it is so you will act. You are literally just putting it out there and it's
Speaker:like undirected rage that you don't even know if it's true, right? So when we get into Jesse
Speaker:Brown, I know you kind of mentioned that sometimes people are just looking for that confirmation
Speaker:bias, right? That it justifies what they're feeling or perhaps allows them to blanket over
Speaker:some of the stuff that they don't want to look at. And often it serves to center themselves.
Speaker:And, you know, I tweeted when I, I'm talking about Jesse Brown's tweet today too. He is
Speaker:a Canadian media publisher, Canada land. fellow podcaster, I suppose. And he did the very same
Speaker:things that we're talking about Ceeja. Like he's purposely sent out two tweets that got
Speaker:a lot of traction and they were complete bullshit. And the first one I'm going to get into is
Speaker:the boycott on Indigo that we hinted at. And he had framed that as an anti-Semitic targeting
Speaker:of a Jewish business. And we've seen Olivia Chow repeat, and a lot of people repeat these
Speaker:refrains when it comes to actually Zionist business. I mean, we talked about Aroma Cafe on a previous
Speaker:episode, but Indigo is a different beast altogether. And Jesse Brown has been in the game long enough
Speaker:to know that Indigo has been a valid boycott target since 2007, since it became apparent
Speaker:that Heather Reisman, the founder... Not only was that the center of what we talked about
Speaker:earlier in terms of CJA, but she founded HESEC Foundation. That's H-E-S-E-G, Foundation for
Speaker:Lone IDF Soldiers. What it is, it's a recruitment program for foreigners to join the IDF that
Speaker:operates on Canadian soil. I hate saying Canadian soil, that's such an awful term. You know what
Speaker:I'm talking about. So That's illegal, really. It's done under the list like guise of a charitable
Speaker:foundation. But you are recruiting for a foreign military service in another country. That is
Speaker:illegal in Canada, but the IDF do it all the time. So it's not a Jewish-owned business.
Speaker:Reisman is Jewish. But that's not what her identity is based on when you look at the work that
Speaker:she's done. It's a Zionist. That is what her predominant work has been done. It's about
Speaker:centering Israel and their needs, not as a Jewish-owned business. And so he knows this. Jesse Brown
Speaker:knows this. Like when we're talking about bad faith actors and arguments, he became one when
Speaker:he printed that. And then, you know, buried in the replies, he's acknowledged that he's
Speaker:gone off base, but he doesn't remove the tweet. You know, like there's such importance placed
Speaker:on, you know, people's own prominence and place and centering their feelings that were valid
Speaker:in the moment or whatever his excuse is, but they remain. And for me, that is so problematic
Speaker:because if this isn't a right-wing publication, this is considered a left-wing. media publication,
Speaker:independent media, things that we have promoted on the show, not Canada Land specifically,
Speaker:but the need for publications like this. And so he's coming out sounding like the rebel.
Speaker:And I don't know, like that, I got particularly upset with this, especially, we always talk
Speaker:about when it comes from within and he does it again. There's a CTV article that he republishes.
Speaker:using their awful headline, and we've seen so many awful headlines these days, you know,
Speaker:like CP24 called the last weekend a Hamas-Israeli rally in Toronto. Like, that was their headline.
Speaker:But, you know, Jesse Brown, he repeats this stuff. If you read deep within the article,
Speaker:the police say it was not hate related. There were no anti-Semitic messages left. And I'm
Speaker:not one to side with the fucking police. But believe me, they would be loving to lay hate
Speaker:crime charges. We've already given examples of them doing that. And if they were presented
Speaker:with no evidence of the contract, you know what I mean? And Jesse doesn't even bother to mention
Speaker:this within his description of it. Yeah, I don't even know. It's, it's, it's exactly what we
Speaker:were just talking about. Right. And I think that, you know, I don't know that I feel like
Speaker:this story in a way has a certain emotional connection for a lot of people in the sense
Speaker:of like, well, maybe, maybe this is just like a me thing, but Indigo, Indigo chapters, bookstores
Speaker:like that. Like. Something like as a kid, I really enjoyed spending time in, I was a bookworm,
Speaker:being surrounded by all these books. And I used to go to mall, what was the first place I wanna
Speaker:go to? Indigo chapters. Right, so there's a certain like, oh fuck, really? The learning
Speaker:that like. You know the connection. Yeah, that's the face my family makes when they find out
Speaker:there's yet another business we have to boycott, right? Yeah, just make me a list of who we
Speaker:can shop at but what does that feeling feel like initially it feels like I Don't want this
Speaker:to be true. So let me make it not true, you know like oh Let me find some way to justify
Speaker:this is the first feeling. And it is a human thing that we all, you know, like you don't
Speaker:want it to be true. How do I make this not true? How do I change this? You know, it's not that
Speaker:you're narrating that in your head, but that's what the feeling is, right? But I feel like
Speaker:for Jesse, it's not so much as like, Oh, we should be allowed to shop at Indigo, like trying
Speaker:to give people permission to shop at Indigo. He's trying to frame. all the actions of pro-Palestinian
Speaker:work as anti-Semitic. He says he's not. Yeah. But step by step he's doing that. Jesse's completely
Speaker:lost it there. I'm more saying about the effectiveness that this has on the public reading it. reading
Speaker:about this, this is something that people are going to be feeling. And there's a reason that
Speaker:these, like, these are things that no one seems to think about, like, in terms of, like, whenever
Speaker:we're like, spreading information, it's like, we have to like, think of, like, how will these
Speaker:things be perceived? How will these things be received? You know? And that's kind of like
Speaker:what I'm trying to think about here, because like, I know that, like, I didn't want it to
Speaker:be true, you know? But then it's like, okay, that's exactly it. Like, Jesse, I mean, Clint
Speaker:is supposedly a journalist, right? Like, you have Responsibility here than to like figure
Speaker:out these points, you know, you have to it's like there is a responsibility to the public
Speaker:You know because no there was an empty set there was not anti-semitism happening there so you
Speaker:spreading this information means that you're spreading misinformation and like You know
Speaker:like if you want to claim your left it like there are certain like responsibilities here
Speaker:The figure thinking these things out and it goes for all of us, you know, it goes for us,
Speaker:too, you know, like Just to create a bit of an example here, it's so frustrating that feeling
Speaker:of like, oh, there's this horrible oppression happening and nobody seems to be paying attention.
Speaker:And you just want to find a way to get through to people and break through to people. So when
Speaker:horrible things happen... When you hear about something horrible, you immediately want to
Speaker:spread that everywhere because you want to believe like, look, this will be the thing, this will
Speaker:be the thing and people will see how bad it is. And so we're prone to, if someone was to
Speaker:attempt to use our frustration to spread misinformation, I'm sure many of us would be susceptible to
Speaker:it, right? But that's why we have to be constantly vigilant. That's why we have to be making an
Speaker:effort because that frustration, it lies in all of us, right? And so, but like, if you
Speaker:call yourself a journalist, that goes fucking, not even double, that goes like five times
Speaker:for you. You have a fucking responsibility to make sure that your information, you dot your
Speaker:I's, cross your T's, you know what's going on. If there's antisemitism happening, report on
Speaker:it. you need to verify these things right so it's just really frustrating because you know
Speaker:a lot of people you know this one's hitting a lot of people you know a lot of people trusted
Speaker:them a lot of people like really care about you know Canada land and it's like we've lost
Speaker:enough things right like there's nothing sacred you know like We don't have many spaces or
Speaker:places that we can turn to that we feel safe for information. And like, it's all like, it's
Speaker:all leaves us feeling lost and confused and everything. And it's fucking frustrating, you
Speaker:know? And I wanna be clear, cause I did send out something that could be perceived as a
Speaker:bit callous. And it was about the way Jesse and others in the media, but also... politicians,
Speaker:and even like your friends, are continuing to really want to center the feelings of the Jewish
Speaker:community. And well-intentioned people will just say, you know, it is a time that you can
Speaker:recognize the grief of all humans or the impacts to many communities. And that isn't wrong.
Speaker:I do feel for Jewish comrades. And I can imagine that this is a very traumatic experience in
Speaker:itself. But there's two things there. If you have been supportive of the state of Israel
Speaker:in your time, you should be feeling some discomfort in this moment. You should not fear for your
Speaker:life. You should not fear for your safety. You should not fear for your job. But if you have
Speaker:been even quietly propping up Zionism and Israel, buying Israeli bonds, and then seeing what
Speaker:this money has done and what this ideology is doing. there is a discomfort that should be
Speaker:experienced. And I shouldn't center the needs of those people feeling that discomfort at
Speaker:this moment, right? If you have supported the occupier and you are now feeling guilt in any
Speaker:way, that is for you to work through. That is not for me to center while a genocide is being
Speaker:happening, while I'm watching Palestinian voices being almost completely absent from the media.
Speaker:And when they are there, they're cut horribly, like the edits are just horrendous. Like there's
Speaker:just... In this moment, we're talking about over 11,000 dead Palestinians. A land invasion,
Speaker:an annexation, ethnic cleansing. That is happening. It's not being implied in a chant, right? Because
Speaker:of how you've been told to perceive from the river to the sea. It's not being implied in
Speaker:a boycott that people don't like Jewish people. It's, it's actually happening right now. So
Speaker:for me, it's important to be centering Palestinian people in this moment. This is a crisis. It
Speaker:is urgent. There is no actual time and space for us to work through that other shit. I'm
Speaker:sorry. And it comes off as really white supremacy to say that, yeah, but, yeah, but what about
Speaker:how Jewish people are feeling right now? And, you know, I'm not completely rejecting what
Speaker:about ism either, because I've played that. You know, when we were funding Ukraine, I did
Speaker:say, what about Palestine? We were, and we were criticized for that. You know, Joe Roberts
Speaker:went down in flames famously for saying that the left just absolutely cannot mention Palestine
Speaker:in this moment because that is to legitimize it. But at the same time, like this what about-ism
Speaker:and centering Jewish fear, it's a problem because Netanyahu is using that fear to justify what
Speaker:he's doing right now. All of what you're seeing happening in Gaza and the West Bank is being
Speaker:justified out of fear of what might happen. Because you can't take back what Hamas has
Speaker:already done. That's not going to happen. Those people aren't coming back. You likely won't
Speaker:get the hostages back either. If you've seen Gaza, this is sold on the premise that it's
Speaker:defense on what might happen next. That fear. So don't take that fucking fear right now as
Speaker:we're trying to stop that genocide and put it in my face because I don't want to see it right
Speaker:now. Okay, because it's been used to just justify so much shit that you don't get to center it
Speaker:right now. You deal with that on your own right now. And we deal with actual cases of antisemitism
Speaker:and the absolute rise of Islamophobia. Toronto City Council, you know, they're working on
Speaker:essentially
Speaker:And folks, on face value, you can read Pasternak's motion, and it looks like a real genuine attempt
Speaker:to address anti-Semitism and Islamophobia. However, pro-Israeli rallies, you know, at Christie
Speaker:Pitts, are never labeled as pro-genocide rallies. You may see snide comments here and there on
Speaker:the internet, but no media outlet, no politician is going to point at those rallies and say,
Speaker:Right? They're not doing that. That's not labeled Islamophobia when they raised the Israeli flag.
Speaker:But it is when you raise the Palestinian flag. Many times over, like the Maple has put together
Speaker:a great piece on all the people who've lost their job, been arrested, criminalized, silenced,
Speaker:kicked off boards because simply they are asking for an end to the Gaza bombing or asserting
Speaker:Palestinian humanness. You know, that is actively being sold as Criminal intent terrorist intent.
Speaker:So when you see motions like this before City Council and Olivia child looking like she's
Speaker:ready to support it. I believe it passed first reading or I believe it passed I Would need
Speaker:to link it. Um, yeah, I think I think it did so
Speaker:It's not just an attempt to lessen hate. It is, and if you look at James Pasternak, the
Speaker:person who, the counselor who brought this to motion, like he has warned kids to not go to
Speaker:school, to not participate in these anti-Israeli rallies. Like he has really whipped people
Speaker:up along the narratives that we've been talking about today. And so he is the author of that
Speaker:motion. You can bet your bottom dollar it is not designed to address Islamophobia whatsoever.
Speaker:that it's strictly there to do this. And so from the media pundits to the political personalities
Speaker:that we thought we could fucking trust, they've almost all let us down. Absolutely, absolutely.
Speaker:It's what we've just been talking about here, just weaponization. And like, it's history
Speaker:repeating itself. That's the, I think that's one of the most frustrating parts about watching
Speaker:everything unfold. It's just like... how much it's all just a cycle of history. How many
Speaker:times we've seen such things play out again. People wanna paint the narrative that like,
Speaker:there's something unique and special and complicated and different about this. No, there isn't.
Speaker:We've seen this kind of situation play out time and time again. I brought it up before when
Speaker:I talk about trusty propaganda, but in justification of the Gulf Wars, there was that story of the...
Speaker:the Iraqi soldiers were taking Kuwait babies out of their incubators and leaving them to
Speaker:die, right? That ended up, turned out was fabricated by a think tank, right? But that got spread
Speaker:everywhere and people were afraid and angry and all of these emotions and then how many
Speaker:people died because of that fake story, you know? Like, the weaponization here, it's horrible
Speaker:because like... Fuck, it's not like, this is not like a symmetrical situation. All this
Speaker:time, like even if, like eventually, you know, Western powers get involved, stop the funding,
Speaker:you know, like we get the things we're demanding, like every day that goes by is unimaginable
Speaker:loss in Palestine, you know? And you can see that they're not, they don't fucking feel that,
Speaker:they don't feel that. And I know, I know that like, at some point it does get difficult,
Speaker:you know, like as these things draw on, it does get fucking difficult to remind yourself, hey,
Speaker:that this is real, that what's happening here is real and devastating and you can't turn
Speaker:away from it. Because you know, we only have like, humans have an incredible capacity to,
Speaker:to adapt to horrible things. And like a new normal. Yeah. So it starts feeling like, oh,
Speaker:this is normal, you know? No, it's not. Do not suppress your humanity. It's not. We need to
Speaker:feel it. We need to feel it. And fucking fight for something better, you know? And you know,
Speaker:actually, you know what? That brings us to the next thing, I guess, which is, you know, there's
Speaker:been all kinds of calls, you know, for a ceasefire. Ceasefire this, ceasefire that. Not even because
Speaker:Trudeau says, what does he call it? A humanitarian pause. You know, Bible almost ceasefire. Do
Speaker:you have that clip? I feel like we should just throw it in here, but I could recreate it.
Speaker:It was like cease. Uh, I mean, humanitarian pause. What I meant to say was cease escalation
Speaker:of hostilities. Like he worked really hard to make sure he did not say the C word. Yeah.
Speaker:They can barely say ceasefire, right? Humanitarian pause, all these things. But then again, you
Speaker:get a ceasefire. Then what? You still have a genocide. You still have the apartheid. You
Speaker:know, it doesn't change the realities. You know what we're not talking about? We're not talking
Speaker:about actual solutions here. And I think that we need to talk about that because we are a
Speaker:part of the problem. You know, Western nations created this problem. Like we've created so
Speaker:many problems in the Middle East by going and drawing up borders for our own convenience
Speaker:without any consideration and under the false belief in, in ethno states as something that
Speaker:should be created in any kind of way. Like what a ridiculous concept, right? And so, you know,
Speaker:this week I wrote an article, an op-ed for the Humber paper, where I was essentially arguing
Speaker:in favor of the one state solution of a, but to be clear, when I say a one state solution,
Speaker:I mean a democratic, secular state with equal rights for all. And I felt- I think socialist
Speaker:would just be a bonus. Yeah, no, I mean, the hope is that would be socialist. But, but the
Speaker:reason I did that was because I was like, you know, like, so frustrated because nobody can
Speaker:tell me what happens next. Nobody can tell me what happens the day after the ceasefire. Nobody
Speaker:can, nobody seems to have any long term solutions. Oh, like, there's a lot of people calling for
Speaker:like the 1967 borders, right? But that just felt Oh, I've seen people just like draw a
Speaker:line in the middle to a north end is Israel. We'll make the bottom Palestine. Everyone has
Speaker:from the river to the sea. We're good. We're done. I can't help but feel like that is such
Speaker:a Western colonialist solution. The idea that we draw lines on a map and that solves our
Speaker:problems. What the fuck? It goes like it goes against like the idea of humanity that like
Speaker:we're. that there's more that brings us in common and together with each other than is a part,
Speaker:you know? You see like Palestinians and Jewish people, anti-Zionist Jews, hand in hand at
Speaker:these protests and you're telling me, oh wait, we need to keep everyone separate? I just cannot
Speaker:believe such a thing. It does not make sense and part of it is informed by the fact You
Speaker:know, I'm Lebanese and my dad, I've been having a lot of conversations with him that I found
Speaker:really interesting because, you know, as somebody who actually fucking lived through horrible
Speaker:war,
Speaker:I get perspectives from him that I'm just not getting elsewhere, right? Like he seen horrible
Speaker:things and he... is fighting so like he is arguing so much in favor of like Palestinian liberation
Speaker:here even though his family fought against the Palestinians right and you know I was talking
Speaker:to him and he was telling me about how in his work there's a there's a Jewish man who looks
Speaker:more like him than anybody who he's ever worked with. Right. And because, you know, he doesn't
Speaker:see a lot of people who look like, I don't see a lot of people who look like me in my day
Speaker:to day, you know, and how he was thinking and like how people always compare how they look
Speaker:alike and stuff. And he was like, yeah, because we're the same people, you know, there's, we're
Speaker:not different Palestinians and, and Israelis are not different. You know, They were not
Speaker:different. And at the end of the day, the Holy Land, like it's sacred to all the Abrahamic
Speaker:religions, not just Judaism and Islam, not just Christianity, but also many smaller, lesser
Speaker:known religions like the Druze or the Samaritans. You know, like there, this is a land that is
Speaker:important to many people and it should be accessible to all people. And if you create some two state
Speaker:dividing things, then. You're just furthering this idea of separation. You're furthering
Speaker:this idea that people are different and that they're enemies of each other and that they're
Speaker:separate because they can't live together because they're so fundamentally different. We can't
Speaker:gather. That's such a racist trope. Yeah. Because they don't mean Israelis can't live peacefully,
Speaker:right? It's always that it's the Muslim population that is framed as inherently violent or Palestinians
Speaker:in particular. And it ignores history. Horrible things happen. That's history. But people find
Speaker:a way to build again afterwards. Lebanon went through decades of civil war. And today in
Speaker:Lebanon, the conflicts are not on sectarian lines. They're based on the corruption of the
Speaker:government in general. But people live together. You know, and I'm not going to paint Lebanon
Speaker:as a fucking success story because it's anything but and honestly, and one of my big criticisms
Speaker:is a lot is the idea of putting like, oh, the president has to be Maronite Christian and
Speaker:the Prime Minister is Sunni and Speaker of Shia or whatever the fuck it is, right? I think
Speaker:that's such a horrible system. I think whenever you try it, like some people are, because there's
Speaker:arguments of creating a bi-national state, right? Where you split the power. Horrible idea. Why?
Speaker:Because whenever you're trying to divide things on sectarian lines, it leads to the rise of
Speaker:authoritarians like Benjamin Netanyahu, the fucking fascist that he is. People like him,
Speaker:they don't just happen. It's the consequences. How is it that Israel got to this point? It's
Speaker:a consequence of trying to create a nation state because it's inherently built on the idea of
Speaker:supremacy, which is an authoritarian idea that lends itself to other authoritarian ideas that
Speaker:lends itself to the rise of fascism. We cannot have that. This is not the kind of world that
Speaker:we should be building. So the idea, yeah, just point of it being that like, and, and just
Speaker:another example, of course, being Bosnia and Herzegovina where, you know, um, just a bi-national
Speaker:nation, I still don't believe in the concept of bi-national nations either, but you know,
Speaker:they separate, they have like three presidents of like Croatia, Serbia, and then the Bosnian
Speaker:president. But you know. It's one country. Like. Anyways, my point being more along the lines
Speaker:of. We like when I'm looking at this situation, I'm looking at my values. I wanted to something
Speaker:to reflect it. And I think the idea of having a state where all peoples have equal rights
Speaker:and freedom to practice their religions, where they live together, where, you know, we're
Speaker:not furthering these fucking. supremacist ideas because that's what it is these colonialist
Speaker:ideas you're not going to fix colonialism with more colonialism You know, oh there's some
Speaker:people that say you can't call what's happening colonialism or imperialism Like you know, they
Speaker:want to remove that literally created by the west You know, this was the brainchild of the
Speaker:uk and Like this was literally colonialism just like the creation of all of the fucking borders
Speaker:in the middle east were colonialism Like it's not just Israel-Palestine, it's every fucking
Speaker:border there. It's most of the fucking Africa, you know? I think the more you point that out,
Speaker:the more easier it becomes to understand why Canada has taken this hyper-Israeli defensive
Speaker:position, almost to the isolating on the world stage. Right? We are really out of step and
Speaker:a lot of people scratch their head and we've talked about the colonial imagination. But-
Speaker:you know, defending this model and not calling it into question, or framing it as colonial,
Speaker:you know, is super important to the Canadian state for itself to remain legitimate because
Speaker:Bob Ray, a lot of folks, you know, you got the former UN ambassadors, Canadian ambassadors
Speaker:to the UN, just aghast. at our recent voting record in the UN, especially when you put it
Speaker:into context of what's happening right now, that we've actually reversed our position.
Speaker:So much gains had been made in terms of the Palestinian diaspora and political maneuvering
Speaker:and whatnot that's happened to get Canada to come around a little bit on its position within
Speaker:the UN and on the state of the illegal occupation. But even before this fall's escalation in hostilities...
Speaker:Canada started to really change its tact again. And I watched a really great six minute video
Speaker:by Breach Media, as always I'll link that. They do a really good job of explaining the relationship
Speaker:between Canada and Israel, and they talk on the colonial aspect as well. But really what
Speaker:it boils down to is US interests. and aligning with US interests and wanting to appear as
Speaker:like major players on the stage. But just to give folks how out of step of the rest of the
Speaker:globe that we are, many states now have recalled US ambassadors or have recalled their Israeli
Speaker:ambassadors. They have cut political ties. There's motions going to the UN very rapidly now to
Speaker:deal with the situation and Canada has... either abstained or voted no. And on the most recent
Speaker:one, it was so basic too. We got into a discussion about the UN and its lack of teeth, that a
Speaker:lot of it essentially are just really statements that don't have any tangible repercussions
Speaker:tied to them or anything. But this one here on November 12th, it was really just for Israel,
Speaker:force Israel to fall under... the fourth Geneva Convention, right? It's Israel to accept the
Speaker:fact that they need to apply to those standards, which means if you occupy somewhere, you need
Speaker:to make sure that you don't bomb their fucking hospitals. So you need to make sure that they
Speaker:have medical care. You also, there's, you know, there's all sorts of criteria that are set
Speaker:in the Geneva Convention on how you're supposed to act if you do occupy somewhere, even though
Speaker:you're not supposed to occupy anywhere. So just to speak to the meaning list of this shit.
Speaker:But even Canada... Oh, before. Another one of the criteria is important to mention there
Speaker:for this convention is that you're not supposed to be transferring your population into the
Speaker:occupied territory. Meaning you're not supposed to be ethnically cleansing this occupied territory.
Speaker:Right? If it's just to secure your own borders or whatever justification you've given it,
Speaker:you're not actually supposed to take it. that's annexing it, that is then, yeah, that's ethnic
Speaker:cleansing, then you're falling into what we're seeing genocide. Because not only have they
Speaker:been systemically eating away at the West Bank illegally, right? This is all established illegal
Speaker:by international law, ruled like 2004, something ridiculous. And they just incrementally taking,
Speaker:taking. But now we've actually seen them annex Gaza, right? The complete north of Gaza is
Speaker:like essentially under the control of the Israeli army. They say they were not going to cede
Speaker:security of the area to it. I can't see them doing so. And so even Canada, when asked to
Speaker:just have them at least take on the role of an occupier, the legal framework, Canada's
Speaker:like, no, no. And we voted only with the US, Israel, Hungary, and like these three micro
Speaker:Asia, micro Asia, these three small island nations. Pacific Island nations, which for the record,
Speaker:the colonialism there, no one fucking talks about, but half of the Pacific Islands is still
Speaker:owned by the France, the US or England. Not only that, but they rely on Western nations
Speaker:to on a lot of aid and they are completely, these are islands that will soon be underwater.
Speaker:And so they're completely beholden to Western nation support because of climate disaster.
Speaker:So it gets even more awful as you look at it, right? So obviously their votes are being leveraged,
Speaker:but these are the actors that Canada is standing with. Santiago, fucking Russia and Ukraine
Speaker:voted together on this, okay? They voted that yes, as an occupier, you need to at least follow
Speaker:these rules. Israel, will you at least agree to that? You know, like they won't, they could
Speaker:come together on this, but Canada still stands apart? Like that is... fucking horrible. So
Speaker:Bob Ray's really drawn the ire of this, right? He is the focal point. Obviously, he's not
Speaker:making all of the decisions. Like this is a man whose job, like if you looked at his feed,
Speaker:you would not know that there's a genocide happening. And he is our ambassador to the UN. He has
Speaker:a role to play here. And someone pointed out, Michael Bookhart made a great point that if
Speaker:you look at his feed and the last time he spoke of El Chifa was to repeat those Israeli claims
Speaker:that there is a Hamas headquarter underneath it. And now we know 15 days after that tweet,
Speaker:that hospital is completely surrounded by Israeli tanks, after being bombarded, after being blockaded
Speaker:of water, medicine, and anything possible. This is the hospital that has the 39 babies in incubators
Speaker:to have already passed away. I haven't gotten any updates as to their situation because the
Speaker:World Health Organization can no longer really communicate with them there. Side note, what's
Speaker:up with Hungary? Because I noticed that they're frequently a descending voice here. One of
Speaker:those is like, you'll see a vote like this, like Canada, US, Hungary. What's up with Hungary?
Speaker:I don't know. One of our viewers has to tweet at us and see if they can explain that to us.
Speaker:I guess my geopolitics isn't on point here. I've noticed this with a few votes. But anyways,
Speaker:yeah, no, it's like... We even abstained from asking for humanitarian truths. So like, you
Speaker:know, Trudeau won't say ceasefire, but, and he says over and over again to our face that
Speaker:yes, he supports humanitarian pause. Like that's as far as we've been able to come along. But
Speaker:when it's time to vote on humanitarian pauses, we abstain. So those two-faced assholes, they
Speaker:don't even, aren't even doing what they're talking about in the media. Those small concessions
Speaker:that we get them to make in the media still don't. don't fall into any fruition. And this
Speaker:is why what we're doing here is so important. When we talk about the West being an active
Speaker:participant, that's what we mean. They're actively not just funding and endorsing. They're funding
Speaker:it. They're endorsing it. They're fighting for it on a global stage. We're actively complacent
Speaker:in this. Not more than complacent. We're participants. Which is why we need to stand up, which is
Speaker:why we need to keep putting pressure because what a fucking contrast to what Toronto looks
Speaker:like, you know? Like the thousands and thousands of people in the marching industries of Toronto.
Speaker:What a fucking contrast to that. It is. And I think that's a huge miscalculation.
Speaker:Between like what their political careers will look like down the road, I believe they're
Speaker:all going to suffer from this. But Also, the imperialist intent behind this has suffered.
Speaker:The masks are off and there has never been this kind of support for Palestinian resistance
Speaker:ever. And it wasn't created by the conditions Hamas created. Israel is to be credited for
Speaker:really waking the world up. And our guest last week... talked about this when they talk about
Speaker:delegitimizing Israel. by sometimes forcing state actors to demonstrate the level of cruelty
Speaker:that they will go to is an unnecessary, sorry, is a necessary step in demonstrating the whole
Speaker:illegitimacy of the occupation. And as horrible as that might imagine, like, and just like
Speaker:the Israeli citizens that can't be brought back. despite the incredible violence that's been
Speaker:vised upon Gaza. We won't get those 11,000 people back plus. Like, they won't come back, but
Speaker:they are martyrs because I believe their deaths. must have purpose now. They have to if that's
Speaker:all we can do. is give their deaths, because we try to stop it, right? Like every day we
Speaker:try to stop it. We can't... It's not stopping. It's getting worse. So they have to have meaning.
Speaker:They have to. And it's why like we need to, we can't stop imagining, you know, that better
Speaker:world. And that's why, you know, one thing I talked about in my article was the West owes
Speaker:some serious fucking reparations, you know.
Speaker:We need to, like, the way I see it, we need to, like, that same money that we're fucking
Speaker:pouring into, like, these endless wars and infinite arms as much as they want. Put that money and
Speaker:go build some fucking infrastructure and build a home, you know? Build, well, you know, fund.
Speaker:I know, I gave you that look because, you know, we don't want to rebuild it in the way that
Speaker:Iraq was rebuilt. No, not in the way. Obviously, like, yeah. But like we need to go and like
Speaker:people say, oh, the one say it's impossible. No, it's not. Not like you're telling me if
Speaker:we were to go and actually facilitate this shit with some financing, it's impossible. No. And
Speaker:that's what we need to do because we, it's our fault. Like it is our fault. And we're so far
Speaker:away from that conversation right now. Like what we're seeing here is we're so fucking
Speaker:far away. No one's even like the discourse is not even close to being that. But this is why
Speaker:like we need to be bold in these times. We need to... Like in the face of darkness, we need
Speaker:to imagine like what we need to remind us of what it is we're fighting for. What is that
Speaker:better world? And I sound so fucking cheesy when I say shit like that, but you know, you
Speaker:do, but it's important because how do you fight for something if you can't envision it, right?
Speaker:Free Palestine is just a slogan. If when asked, what does that look like? You don't have an
Speaker:answer, right? Then you can fight for people and for justness. and all of that and understand
Speaker:that it's still a valid fight, but it takes a different meaning and a different level when
Speaker:you can have that vision. And in the end, you know, that vision has to be determined by the
Speaker:Palestinian people, right? What that rebuilding looks like, what that nation looks like, needs
Speaker:to center the voices of Palestinian people because they've been completely erased for so long.
Speaker:Right. And. Although there's clearly so much work to do in terms of bringing politicians
Speaker:around or whatever that work is going to end up looking like, I am absolutely buoyed by
Speaker:the fact that especially youth, are not going to let this go. And I think as awful as everything
Speaker:has been, I believe we are closer to realizing a free Palestine than we ever have been. and
Speaker:nobody wants to have gotten here this way. but all other efforts to bring people out in the
Speaker:way that they've come out, right? And holding the line the way that the diaspora has been
Speaker:begging us to do before this happened, before it escalated to this point, but it didn't,
Speaker:right? We didn't do enough before it was too late. And like, we don't have to hold onto
Speaker:that. That's not like to like sit with guilt, but it is certainly to like double our efforts
Speaker:at this point. and not have. Like that discussion we had earlier Santiago about not making compromises
Speaker:in those visions. because socialists are always accused of fighting for utopia, right? Like
Speaker:framed as an unachievable utopic vision. But folks can't allow that to happen in this case,
Speaker:right? Because there's been so much compromise and concessions made. And as we go through
Speaker:this, there'll be so many people that want to water down that vision or colonize it. And
Speaker:to maintain the Palestinian vision of what a free Palestine looks like is so important.
Speaker:That's why I really get upset when people try to shut down from the river to the sea, because
Speaker:it's not about what they think it means. Maybe some people have been told that's what it means,
Speaker:and so that it scares them, but that's not what it fucking means. But it's been weaponized
Speaker:because of the borders it suggests. An undoing of what has been done. And that is unacceptable.
Speaker:to imperialists to go back to a full and recognized Palestinian freedom from the Jordan River to
Speaker:the Mediterranean Sea like they were. Full restitution. Right? That is why that is being criminalized,
Speaker:because that can't be normalized. That can't be the vision. That would be unacceptable to
Speaker:U.S. interests in controlling oil in the region. And that's the bottom line. That is a wrap
Speaker:on another episode of Blueprints of Disruption. Thank you for joining us. Also, a very big
Speaker:thank you to the producer of our show, Santiago Halu-Quintero. Blueprints of Disruption is
Speaker:an independent production operated cooperatively. You can follow us on Twitter at BPofDisruption.
Speaker:If you'd like to help us continue disrupting the status quo, please share our content. And
Speaker:if you have the means, consider becoming a patron. Not only does our support come from the progressive
Speaker:community, so does our content. So reach out to us and let us know what or who we should
Speaker:be amplifying. So until next time, keep disrupting.