Speaker:

There is so much out there to get mad about. Social injustices, class warfare, continued

Speaker:

colonization, the act of destruction of our planet by those focused on prophets and not

Speaker:

people. We can find it overwhelming at times. The good news is there are equally as many,

Speaker:

if not more, stories of people coming together and rising up against the forces at play. So

Speaker:

the creators of Blueprints of Disruption have added a new weekly segment, Ravel Rants, where

Speaker:

we will unpack the stories that have us most riled up, share calls to action, and most importantly,

Speaker:

celebrate resistance. Someone tweeted out today, has the Canadian media gone into some sort

Speaker:

of meltdown mode? And I totally was feeling that. This last week has just been particularly

Speaker:

enraging. Like I know we've talked in the last since October 7th. We have talked many, many

Speaker:

times before that. Well before that, our frustrations with mainstream media and forced narratives

Speaker:

and manufactured consent. But like this last week has been something else. So there's a

Speaker:

few cases that particularly demonstrate the absurdity, maybe the desperation. that's on

Speaker:

display in order to justify what we're seeing in Gaza. Because in the end, all of the arguments

Speaker:

that happen, I feel they're all part of that justification. And we're going to get into

Speaker:

that as we go through this week's rant. But yeah, there's a few figures within the Canadian

Speaker:

media and just the political scene in general that have particularly drawn my ire. I'm going

Speaker:

to start with the most ridiculous because it really pissed me off and even like my family

Speaker:

doesn't often hear about my Twitter interactions. But when Warren Consilla came out, this is

Speaker:

a former advisor to Jean Cratchani, a liberal advisor, he thinks he's something else, he

Speaker:

tweets out and writes a column to go along with it. that says anybody at the pro-Palestinian

Speaker:

rally that particular weekend should either be deported if they weren't citizens of Canada

Speaker:

or arrested. We're talking about tens of thousands of people in city centers and even smaller

Speaker:

towns, like across Canada, and that's the literal definition of fucking fascism. Because that

Speaker:

isn't even like common opinion. Right? We know three out of four Canadians actually don't

Speaker:

even agree with the Israeli apartheid. So this is strictly the opinion of the very, very top.

Speaker:

Right now it looks like Justin Trudeau and his closest friends, to be honest. But, and if

Speaker:

you don't agree with them, if you bother to stand out in the street and speak against them,

Speaker:

you have media pundits and political advisors calling for mass arrests. And this isn't to

Speaker:

be dis- This isn't to dismiss these folks, like when I make fun of who he really is and the

Speaker:

fact that Ben Mulrooney backed him up. It's happening. An organizer in Calgary has been

Speaker:

arrested by police and charged with disrupting the peace for leading a chant, the chant that

Speaker:

we talk about many, many times now, from the river to the sea, Palestine will be free. And

Speaker:

not just disrupting the peace, they've added a hate motivation charge. So like these kinds

Speaker:

of narratives that these folks are printing out there are happening. They're being realized.

Speaker:

And that is fucking fascism. But, you know, on the good side of that story, even after

Speaker:

Warren Consilla deleted his tweet, obviously he was feeling the heat on that one because

Speaker:

it was just unquestionably awful. So xenophobic as well to go back to the deport them, right?

Speaker:

They don't agree with Canadian values. Deport them. And it's some white man in an office

Speaker:

deciding what Canadian values are. But Ben Mulrooney, for folks that don't know, you know, this is

Speaker:

Brian Mulrooney's son, part of the Canadian empire of brown envelopes stuffed with cash

Speaker:

from capitalists. He doubles down on this shit over and over again, to the point where he's

Speaker:

lost his ambassadorship with the CNIB, the Canadian National Institute for the Blind. So, you know,

Speaker:

cancel culture strikes again. But this stuff just reverberates. Like you have prominent,

Speaker:

I say that, e-news talk fame, but semi-prominent people openly calling for fascist solutions

Speaker:

to dissent. And yeah, it's that and what we're seeing from a lot of other groups is just creating

Speaker:

this atmosphere where it's impossible to talk about this constructively. without having to

Speaker:

deflect all of these ridiculous claims on top of it, right? And these sidetrack issues that

Speaker:

really, I think, just serve to remove Palestinian voices from the conversation, right? Look to

Speaker:

like center anything else but what's happening to the people in Gaza. Right. Here's the good

Speaker:

news is I think that is a sign that they've lost control of the narrative. fully, right?

Speaker:

They're going into these fascist tactics for a reason, because they can see, you know, like,

Speaker:

how many people showed up in Toronto this weekend? I don't even know what the number is. No one

Speaker:

can give us an accurate number ever. A shit ton of people is what it was. Yeah. You know,

Speaker:

I'm seeing, you know, I'm overhearing conversations as I walk through the streets, where I'm hiring

Speaker:

people. talk about how, oh, like they didn't know anything about this issue, and they've

Speaker:

gone and they've read and they're concerned about this and they're concerned. They're like,

Speaker:

oh, but like, Israel's clearly the one with all the power here. So they're like, you know,

Speaker:

this oppression of the Palestinians, that can't be right. What's going on? Literal conversations

Speaker:

I'm hearing on streetcars, you know, like I'm seeing Palestinian pins everywhere. I'm seeing,

Speaker:

like in my day to day walk, and I mean, that's my anecdotal experience. And I know that that's

Speaker:

what that like that. Anecdotal is what anecdotal is. But my point being like, you're seeing

Speaker:

on mass the narrative shift away from, from what it was in the first few weeks, from what

Speaker:

the major sources of information have been trying, the narrative that they've been trying to craft

Speaker:

and they've been left with nothing but to try these fascist tactics to try and regain it.

Speaker:

Oh, we're just not going to let you say this. We're gonna start arresting people. We're gonna

Speaker:

strike fear in you. Well, I wanna make you feel a little better. It's not just anecdotal. That

Speaker:

might be your anecdote from the week, what you've heard, but Toronto wasn't an isolated situation.

Speaker:

The Prime Minister of England told them, don't you dare use arms to stay, Remembrance Day,

Speaker:

to protest. Don't you dare come to our streets on Veterans Day. And surely almost a million

Speaker:

people did. So just like we're trying to figure out if that was the largest protest Toronto's

Speaker:

ever seen on November 12th, November 11th saw something unimaginable in London, again, we

Speaker:

said it on the show, this is repeated in many, many cities. Like I spent, I felt like all

Speaker:

day yesterday just retweeting people from different cities around Canada and their shots of how

Speaker:

big the crowd was. Even I was in Barrie and I'd say that there was about a hundred people

Speaker:

there and this started, the first time I went to Barrie for this, it was like 12th. And he...

Speaker:

there was more than 12 flags this time. And it's not just anecdotal. More people are learning

Speaker:

about the occupation and apartheid. More people are understanding what Zionism is and the actual

Speaker:

goals of Israel. These conversations are happening, but just not in the most prominent spaces.

Speaker:

But it doesn't matter. They're still taking foot. I'm going to center on a word there,

Speaker:

apartheid, because I had a recent realization, I guess, that people aren't as familiar with

Speaker:

the concept of apartheid as I believe they would be. It happened several times where, you know,

Speaker:

I've been discussing apartheid and someone's like, what's apartheid? Or, you know, like

Speaker:

people were asking, like, what does that mean? What is that word? And you know, when you explain

Speaker:

it to people, they're like, oh, that's bad. Because I think that like, based on like, you

Speaker:

know, like the things that we've been taught and the thing, you know, like, you know, you

Speaker:

know, slavery bad and all these things. And like, you know, people, people look at apartheid

Speaker:

and, you know, most people get it. Oh, that's not the world that we want to build. And it's

Speaker:

part of the reason why they've made such an effort to, to not have that be part of the

Speaker:

narrative. Oh yeah. Because I asked you when you told me this, do they not teach apartheid

Speaker:

in school? And I'm so old, it's been so long since I've been in school. And my family taught

Speaker:

me about South Africa and apartheid. And Santiago, we're like, no, like, of course not. We can't

Speaker:

be showing Canadian children the model, right? Like, because they're going to draw too many

Speaker:

parallels between our history and apartheid. And even when we had Chris Ramp's groups on

Speaker:

justice for migrant workers, I mean, he was able to make the very strong argument that

Speaker:

what those folks are experiencing is a form of apartheid. So. But I would love to see,

Speaker:

and actually we could look it up now, but I probably won't, the trends of terms. So how

Speaker:

often are people now looking up apartheid versus what they were doing 40 days ago? Israeli occupation,

Speaker:

like certain phrases that we needed in the narrative a long time ago are catching fire. now. And

Speaker:

there's no putting this back in the box. We can talk about people having short-term memory

Speaker:

loss when it comes to politics, but this is something else. This is another one of those

Speaker:

global collective traumas that we've experienced because we've watched what's happening firsthand

Speaker:

to the people of Palestine. And so there's no erasing those images from people's minds ever

Speaker:

again. You can then repackage it afterwards if that's possible. I just don't think you'll

Speaker:

have the political capital to do that anywhere. But... Even if you do try, this is something

Speaker:

else. This isn't something you could rewrite now thanks to the reach of social media and

Speaker:

whatnot. But I want to go back into that desperation that we're seeing, right? The stuff that really

Speaker:

kind of got me pissed off this week centered on what you see in social media. And that has

Speaker:

a huge impact. And in particular, CJA. That is the... Center for Israeli and Jewish Affairs,

Speaker:

they sent out two really awful tweets that had the fingerprints of actually being manipulated

Speaker:

and surely, blatantly, I can say with confidence, were completely misrepresented with purpose,

Speaker:

with malice. So the first one, I'm sure we've all seen protesters confronting one another

Speaker:

at Concordia University, fully showing everyone's face, tried to dox her, saying she said one

Speaker:

word. Other people say she said another word. I can't repeat either of the words on here,

Speaker:

but there's no attempt to verify. It's just immediately sent out with the most sensationalist

Speaker:

purposes, and we've seen that they've taken down that tweet after considerable heed and

Speaker:

pushback. But I think the worst one was just so obvious, so reeked of desperation and manipulation,

Speaker:

and completely designed to stoke fear into the Jewish community that they claim to represent.

Speaker:

They took a video of protesters outside of an Ontario high school. that were clearly chanting

Speaker:

a chant we've all heard at every rally in the last 30 days, Trudeau Trudeau, you can't hide,

Speaker:

we'll charge you with genocide. And they put it out there and said, and put the caption

Speaker:

as though the students were saying, Judah, you can't hide, we will charge you with genocide.

Speaker:

And I can't verify this, but to my ear, it sounded like it was even sped up the audio. And even

Speaker:

with that sped up or manipulated sound, it was still clear to me what they were saying. And

Speaker:

again, they take this tweet down, but only after all these sensationalist claims that we've

Speaker:

seen around war, which, you know, this war, or we can't call this war, around this conflict,

Speaker:

like all conflicts, it goes out there. There's no putting it back in the box again. Even the

Speaker:

retractions come so quietly, like in this case, they just deleted the tweet. There was no acknowledgement

Speaker:

that they completely manipulated the situation. And so you go from students actually targeting

Speaker:

a liberal prime minister, a valid target of a chant, a person you could actually charge

Speaker:

with war crimes, to making it look like a mob of students hunting down Jews. But that is

Speaker:

a huge difference. This framing of all of these rallies as being against Jewish people, that's

Speaker:

inciting so much fear in the Jewish community. So I do not deny when the Jesse Browns out

Speaker:

there say, you know, your Jewish neighbours are not doing well. Like they're, you know,

Speaker:

someone firebombed a fucking synagogue and you've got a Jewish school in Montreal that has been

Speaker:

shot at twice. So There is already fear within the Jewish community who has already experienced

Speaker:

hate crimes and antisemitism for generations. But then you have Sijah who's tasked with fighting

Speaker:

this antisemitism, making shit up. That's making it worse. And then it's de-validating all the

Speaker:

work that genuinely goes into fighting antisemitism. to pointing it out within our very own movement

Speaker:

because it exists. You know, it's not black or white. It's not like, oh, this movement

Speaker:

isn't anti-Semitic. It isn't at its core, but that's not to say there aren't anti-Semites

Speaker:

within it, but to then conflate these legitimate targets like a prime minister or a Zionist

Speaker:

business and say to the Jewish community that you have so much influence over, right? That

Speaker:

you get your newsletter, you're prominent in their eyes, and you tell them, that actually

Speaker:

all of this means they hate you, knowing that that's not actually what's happening. I can't

Speaker:

help but feel that that's inciting the most amount of fear around this. Because if you're

Speaker:

in those rallies, you don't experience, nobody brings the Jewish people into discussion unless

Speaker:

they are there asserting themselves as Jews against genocide, for example. I've not heard

Speaker:

one speech, I've not heard personally one chant ever. that has been directed at Jewish people

Speaker:

whatsoever. And in fact, if you showed up to a pro-Palestinian rally with your kippah on,

Speaker:

with obvious Jewishness, right? A sign that identifies you as, or whatever, you would be

Speaker:

so warmly welcomed, you know, if you weren't waving an Israeli flag in their face while

Speaker:

they're committing genocide. You know, like that is not an unwelcome space for Jewish people

Speaker:

and anybody from the Jewish organizations that have been part of these actions. Can you tell

Speaker:

you that? So I'm very upset with Sijah right now. I mean, these are the same people who

Speaker:

were absolutely relentless in their pursuit of Sarah Jemma. Right? Like they focused in

Speaker:

on her, but yet tweet out today that the harassment Canadian politicians who support Israel are

Speaker:

facing is unacceptable. That that is some sort of violence. They've lost all legitimacy. CJ

Speaker:

is one of those organizations that you look at and you're like, oh yeah, you were operating

Speaker:

in absolute bad faith. Like they know exactly what they're doing, you know. There's no, um,

Speaker:

oh, there's been misunderstandings or, you know, like, no, they, they're, they're a propaganda

Speaker:

machine. You know, their, their goal is to get people behind the Israeli... war crimes, occupation,

Speaker:

genocide, apartheid of the Palestinians. And, you know, this is something, you know, nothing

Speaker:

new under the sun, but this is something you see in wars. And I feel that we're as the public

Speaker:

were not really prepared enough for this kind of propaganda. You know, it's something, you

Speaker:

know, you see it constantly. You saw how. In 9-11, people, after 9-11, people were afraid.

Speaker:

And how many people used that fear to justify all kinds of horrible things that were really

Speaker:

just personal agendas, mainly for capital purposes, right? CJ is weaponizing fear. And there's

Speaker:

always people to weaponize fear. And it's really hard to... Like for the people who they're

Speaker:

trying to weaponize their fear, it's really hard to make yourself immune to that when you're

Speaker:

afraid, when you actively are afraid, when you're actively are concerned, when you're in these

Speaker:

emotionally vulnerable states, it's really hard to shield yourself from those effects. And

Speaker:

I find that just the lack of concern over this. It's quite telling of something, right? Because,

Speaker:

you know, CJA has no accountability. There's nobody holding them accountable. Just like

Speaker:

last few years, people have been screaming about Russian propaganda and Russian interference

Speaker:

in Canadian politics. Meanwhile, you have an organization that really, like legitimately

Speaker:

is a propaganda arm of the Israeli state operating with impunity in Canada. No accountability.

Speaker:

Let me just back that up a little bit. Sorry, let me just back that up a little bit because...

Speaker:

Dave Gray Donald posted an excellent thread on Twitter that gave the history of Sija and

Speaker:

how it was started by Heather Reisman. And we're going to go back to Heather because she's the

Speaker:

founder of Indigo. So when we talk about a Jewish-owned bookstore, Jesse Brown says Jewish-owned bookstore,

Speaker:

it makes you think like a mom and pop shop, right? Is vandalized. And in fact, he's talking

Speaker:

about indigo books. Heather Reisman basically founded CJA in a knee-jerk reaction response

Speaker:

to a protest where Netanyahu was unable to speak at an event because students made it so. And

Speaker:

they understood that they needed to do a little, a lot more Israeli propaganda here in Canada,

Speaker:

that there was a lot of work to do. And so they created CJA. A lot of folks have described

Speaker:

it as a hostile takeover of the Canadian Jewish Congress, which was a democratic body, had

Speaker:

elections, and was designed to represent the interests of Jewish people in Canada, right?

Speaker:

And whatever that means. Even in the name itself, the Center for Israeli and Jewish Affairs.

Speaker:

Canada isn't even in the name. And these, again, these are points that David Graydonnell brought

Speaker:

up in his thread.

Speaker:

So yeah, they don't even pretend to represent Canadian interests. They are secretive about

Speaker:

their budget, what it is and where a lot of it comes from. And we do know that they spend

Speaker:

like tens of millions of dollars alone just in reiterating Israeli propaganda, almost line

Speaker:

by line with the ruling party over there. And So, Santiago isn't just generalizing. There's

Speaker:

history there, where they have taken what should have been Jewish interests here in Canada and

Speaker:

centered it now on Israeli, and have intrinsically tied those two together as though they're one

Speaker:

in the same. And we've spent considerable time here on the show talking, especially with Jeremy

Speaker:

Appel, on how Judaism and Zionism are not one in the same. And that is the prominent voice

Speaker:

now here in Canada when the media or let's say the Toronto District School Board, for example,

Speaker:

are looking for prominent voices, authoritarian voices on what anti-Semitism is. These are

Speaker:

the people that they're going to. And that's a huge problem. Yeah. And one more thing about

Speaker:

like, you know, when I say they're operating bad faith. You know, and I say this as someone,

Speaker:

you know, like I'm learning all the journalistic ethics and everything, you know, seizure operates

Speaker:

in a way that's a very much like, with an awareness that the first lie is the one that sticks,

Speaker:

you know, they, they post knee jerk, you know, reactionary shit immediately, such as, you

Speaker:

know, the, the whole claim of Judah, you can't hide, you know, like they delete it. later.

Speaker:

But they know that doesn't really matter. You know, it doesn't really matter that they delete

Speaker:

it, you know, they're not somebody who has to respond to elections or accountability of any

Speaker:

kind, right? So people are still going to remember that and believe that, you know, and there's

Speaker:

people who trust this organization, who trust that this organization is looking out for their

Speaker:

interests. They're taking advantage of that. And they're taking advantage of like the human

Speaker:

psychology and the way even how social media works. Right. Like you can see how many people

Speaker:

would share that video, be like, look at this. But how many people are going to share a tweet

Speaker:

that mentions that someone deleted a tweet. Right. Like that's not as sensational. That

Speaker:

is not going to get the same algorithm. Because right now, you know. whenever there's times

Speaker:

of wars, people are faced and this happens on mass, like everyone's faced with like this

Speaker:

uncomfortableness because we, many of us hold like different levels of humanitarian values

Speaker:

and such. And then war calls into question all of our values, you know? And if, if you're

Speaker:

buying into, you know, one side or the other, whatever, you know, buying into the idea of

Speaker:

war in general, like, you're going to have this rationalization to make, right? And so you're,

Speaker:

prowl for any information to help you soothe that discomfort, right? So you see something

Speaker:

like this and it's like, oh, hey, oh, see, see that thing. See, my concerns are valid, you

Speaker:

know. And so, like, it's incredibly powerful. It's an incredibly effective and powerful thing.

Speaker:

See, that's why I avoid though, like I've come across plenty of videos. plenty of infographics

Speaker:

that show the most horrific actions by Israeli soldiers. I mean, I don't share graphic content

Speaker:

pretty much ever because I don't know who's in my feed that's going to be triggered by

Speaker:

it. If I consumed it, that's enough. It's for other people to decide whether they consume

Speaker:

that. But I purposely, purposely try not to share things that enraged me so much because...

Speaker:

You can never really even verify a lot of these videos when they were taken. I am not an expert

Speaker:

at identifying soldier uniforms or any of that, right? And so I don't know. And I know that

Speaker:

the hate and the rage that it actually generated in me in that moment need not be replicated.

Speaker:

That there are enough facts that I know to be true, enough historical context to provide

Speaker:

to prove that. the Israeli Zionist government is illegitimate, that the occupation is illegal

Speaker:

and oppressive. Because by sharing shit like that, you're purposely stoking just pure anger

Speaker:

and you're not even directing it, right? It's not like you have a group of people, you're

Speaker:

making a speech, you have a call to action at the end and you're like, and see, I need you

Speaker:

to know how bad it is so you will act. You are literally just putting it out there and it's

Speaker:

like undirected rage that you don't even know if it's true, right? So when we get into Jesse

Speaker:

Brown, I know you kind of mentioned that sometimes people are just looking for that confirmation

Speaker:

bias, right? That it justifies what they're feeling or perhaps allows them to blanket over

Speaker:

some of the stuff that they don't want to look at. And often it serves to center themselves.

Speaker:

And, you know, I tweeted when I, I'm talking about Jesse Brown's tweet today too. He is

Speaker:

a Canadian media publisher, Canada land. fellow podcaster, I suppose. And he did the very same

Speaker:

things that we're talking about Ceeja. Like he's purposely sent out two tweets that got

Speaker:

a lot of traction and they were complete bullshit. And the first one I'm going to get into is

Speaker:

the boycott on Indigo that we hinted at. And he had framed that as an anti-Semitic targeting

Speaker:

of a Jewish business. And we've seen Olivia Chow repeat, and a lot of people repeat these

Speaker:

refrains when it comes to actually Zionist business. I mean, we talked about Aroma Cafe on a previous

Speaker:

episode, but Indigo is a different beast altogether. And Jesse Brown has been in the game long enough

Speaker:

to know that Indigo has been a valid boycott target since 2007, since it became apparent

Speaker:

that Heather Reisman, the founder... Not only was that the center of what we talked about

Speaker:

earlier in terms of CJA, but she founded HESEC Foundation. That's H-E-S-E-G, Foundation for

Speaker:

Lone IDF Soldiers. What it is, it's a recruitment program for foreigners to join the IDF that

Speaker:

operates on Canadian soil. I hate saying Canadian soil, that's such an awful term. You know what

Speaker:

I'm talking about. So That's illegal, really. It's done under the list like guise of a charitable

Speaker:

foundation. But you are recruiting for a foreign military service in another country. That is

Speaker:

illegal in Canada, but the IDF do it all the time. So it's not a Jewish-owned business.

Speaker:

Reisman is Jewish. But that's not what her identity is based on when you look at the work that

Speaker:

she's done. It's a Zionist. That is what her predominant work has been done. It's about

Speaker:

centering Israel and their needs, not as a Jewish-owned business. And so he knows this. Jesse Brown

Speaker:

knows this. Like when we're talking about bad faith actors and arguments, he became one when

Speaker:

he printed that. And then, you know, buried in the replies, he's acknowledged that he's

Speaker:

gone off base, but he doesn't remove the tweet. You know, like there's such importance placed

Speaker:

on, you know, people's own prominence and place and centering their feelings that were valid

Speaker:

in the moment or whatever his excuse is, but they remain. And for me, that is so problematic

Speaker:

because if this isn't a right-wing publication, this is considered a left-wing. media publication,

Speaker:

independent media, things that we have promoted on the show, not Canada Land specifically,

Speaker:

but the need for publications like this. And so he's coming out sounding like the rebel.

Speaker:

And I don't know, like that, I got particularly upset with this, especially, we always talk

Speaker:

about when it comes from within and he does it again. There's a CTV article that he republishes.

Speaker:

using their awful headline, and we've seen so many awful headlines these days, you know,

Speaker:

like CP24 called the last weekend a Hamas-Israeli rally in Toronto. Like, that was their headline.

Speaker:

But, you know, Jesse Brown, he repeats this stuff. If you read deep within the article,

Speaker:

the police say it was not hate related. There were no anti-Semitic messages left. And I'm

Speaker:

not one to side with the fucking police. But believe me, they would be loving to lay hate

Speaker:

crime charges. We've already given examples of them doing that. And if they were presented

Speaker:

with no evidence of the contract, you know what I mean? And Jesse doesn't even bother to mention

Speaker:

this within his description of it. Yeah, I don't even know. It's, it's, it's exactly what we

Speaker:

were just talking about. Right. And I think that, you know, I don't know that I feel like

Speaker:

this story in a way has a certain emotional connection for a lot of people in the sense

Speaker:

of like, well, maybe, maybe this is just like a me thing, but Indigo, Indigo chapters, bookstores

Speaker:

like that. Like. Something like as a kid, I really enjoyed spending time in, I was a bookworm,

Speaker:

being surrounded by all these books. And I used to go to mall, what was the first place I wanna

Speaker:

go to? Indigo chapters. Right, so there's a certain like, oh fuck, really? The learning

Speaker:

that like. You know the connection. Yeah, that's the face my family makes when they find out

Speaker:

there's yet another business we have to boycott, right? Yeah, just make me a list of who we

Speaker:

can shop at but what does that feeling feel like initially it feels like I Don't want this

Speaker:

to be true. So let me make it not true, you know like oh Let me find some way to justify

Speaker:

this is the first feeling. And it is a human thing that we all, you know, like you don't

Speaker:

want it to be true. How do I make this not true? How do I change this? You know, it's not that

Speaker:

you're narrating that in your head, but that's what the feeling is, right? But I feel like

Speaker:

for Jesse, it's not so much as like, Oh, we should be allowed to shop at Indigo, like trying

Speaker:

to give people permission to shop at Indigo. He's trying to frame. all the actions of pro-Palestinian

Speaker:

work as anti-Semitic. He says he's not. Yeah. But step by step he's doing that. Jesse's completely

Speaker:

lost it there. I'm more saying about the effectiveness that this has on the public reading it. reading

Speaker:

about this, this is something that people are going to be feeling. And there's a reason that

Speaker:

these, like, these are things that no one seems to think about, like, in terms of, like, whenever

Speaker:

we're like, spreading information, it's like, we have to like, think of, like, how will these

Speaker:

things be perceived? How will these things be received? You know? And that's kind of like

Speaker:

what I'm trying to think about here, because like, I know that, like, I didn't want it to

Speaker:

be true, you know? But then it's like, okay, that's exactly it. Like, Jesse, I mean, Clint

Speaker:

is supposedly a journalist, right? Like, you have Responsibility here than to like figure

Speaker:

out these points, you know, you have to it's like there is a responsibility to the public

Speaker:

You know because no there was an empty set there was not anti-semitism happening there so you

Speaker:

spreading this information means that you're spreading misinformation and like You know

Speaker:

like if you want to claim your left it like there are certain like responsibilities here

Speaker:

The figure thinking these things out and it goes for all of us, you know, it goes for us,

Speaker:

too, you know, like Just to create a bit of an example here, it's so frustrating that feeling

Speaker:

of like, oh, there's this horrible oppression happening and nobody seems to be paying attention.

Speaker:

And you just want to find a way to get through to people and break through to people. So when

Speaker:

horrible things happen... When you hear about something horrible, you immediately want to

Speaker:

spread that everywhere because you want to believe like, look, this will be the thing, this will

Speaker:

be the thing and people will see how bad it is. And so we're prone to, if someone was to

Speaker:

attempt to use our frustration to spread misinformation, I'm sure many of us would be susceptible to

Speaker:

it, right? But that's why we have to be constantly vigilant. That's why we have to be making an

Speaker:

effort because that frustration, it lies in all of us, right? And so, but like, if you

Speaker:

call yourself a journalist, that goes fucking, not even double, that goes like five times

Speaker:

for you. You have a fucking responsibility to make sure that your information, you dot your

Speaker:

I's, cross your T's, you know what's going on. If there's antisemitism happening, report on

Speaker:

it. you need to verify these things right so it's just really frustrating because you know

Speaker:

a lot of people you know this one's hitting a lot of people you know a lot of people trusted

Speaker:

them a lot of people like really care about you know Canada land and it's like we've lost

Speaker:

enough things right like there's nothing sacred you know like We don't have many spaces or

Speaker:

places that we can turn to that we feel safe for information. And like, it's all like, it's

Speaker:

all leaves us feeling lost and confused and everything. And it's fucking frustrating, you

Speaker:

know? And I wanna be clear, cause I did send out something that could be perceived as a

Speaker:

bit callous. And it was about the way Jesse and others in the media, but also... politicians,

Speaker:

and even like your friends, are continuing to really want to center the feelings of the Jewish

Speaker:

community. And well-intentioned people will just say, you know, it is a time that you can

Speaker:

recognize the grief of all humans or the impacts to many communities. And that isn't wrong.

Speaker:

I do feel for Jewish comrades. And I can imagine that this is a very traumatic experience in

Speaker:

itself. But there's two things there. If you have been supportive of the state of Israel

Speaker:

in your time, you should be feeling some discomfort in this moment. You should not fear for your

Speaker:

life. You should not fear for your safety. You should not fear for your job. But if you have

Speaker:

been even quietly propping up Zionism and Israel, buying Israeli bonds, and then seeing what

Speaker:

this money has done and what this ideology is doing. there is a discomfort that should be

Speaker:

experienced. And I shouldn't center the needs of those people feeling that discomfort at

Speaker:

this moment, right? If you have supported the occupier and you are now feeling guilt in any

Speaker:

way, that is for you to work through. That is not for me to center while a genocide is being

Speaker:

happening, while I'm watching Palestinian voices being almost completely absent from the media.

Speaker:

And when they are there, they're cut horribly, like the edits are just horrendous. Like there's

Speaker:

just... In this moment, we're talking about over 11,000 dead Palestinians. A land invasion,

Speaker:

an annexation, ethnic cleansing. That is happening. It's not being implied in a chant, right? Because

Speaker:

of how you've been told to perceive from the river to the sea. It's not being implied in

Speaker:

a boycott that people don't like Jewish people. It's, it's actually happening right now. So

Speaker:

for me, it's important to be centering Palestinian people in this moment. This is a crisis. It

Speaker:

is urgent. There is no actual time and space for us to work through that other shit. I'm

Speaker:

sorry. And it comes off as really white supremacy to say that, yeah, but, yeah, but what about

Speaker:

how Jewish people are feeling right now? And, you know, I'm not completely rejecting what

Speaker:

about ism either, because I've played that. You know, when we were funding Ukraine, I did

Speaker:

say, what about Palestine? We were, and we were criticized for that. You know, Joe Roberts

Speaker:

went down in flames famously for saying that the left just absolutely cannot mention Palestine

Speaker:

in this moment because that is to legitimize it. But at the same time, like this what about-ism

Speaker:

and centering Jewish fear, it's a problem because Netanyahu is using that fear to justify what

Speaker:

he's doing right now. All of what you're seeing happening in Gaza and the West Bank is being

Speaker:

justified out of fear of what might happen. Because you can't take back what Hamas has

Speaker:

already done. That's not going to happen. Those people aren't coming back. You likely won't

Speaker:

get the hostages back either. If you've seen Gaza, this is sold on the premise that it's

Speaker:

defense on what might happen next. That fear. So don't take that fucking fear right now as

Speaker:

we're trying to stop that genocide and put it in my face because I don't want to see it right

Speaker:

now. Okay, because it's been used to just justify so much shit that you don't get to center it

Speaker:

right now. You deal with that on your own right now. And we deal with actual cases of antisemitism

Speaker:

and the absolute rise of Islamophobia. Toronto City Council, you know, they're working on

Speaker:

essentially

Speaker:

And folks, on face value, you can read Pasternak's motion, and it looks like a real genuine attempt

Speaker:

to address anti-Semitism and Islamophobia. However, pro-Israeli rallies, you know, at Christie

Speaker:

Pitts, are never labeled as pro-genocide rallies. You may see snide comments here and there on

Speaker:

the internet, but no media outlet, no politician is going to point at those rallies and say,

Speaker:

Right? They're not doing that. That's not labeled Islamophobia when they raised the Israeli flag.

Speaker:

But it is when you raise the Palestinian flag. Many times over, like the Maple has put together

Speaker:

a great piece on all the people who've lost their job, been arrested, criminalized, silenced,

Speaker:

kicked off boards because simply they are asking for an end to the Gaza bombing or asserting

Speaker:

Palestinian humanness. You know, that is actively being sold as Criminal intent terrorist intent.

Speaker:

So when you see motions like this before City Council and Olivia child looking like she's

Speaker:

ready to support it. I believe it passed first reading or I believe it passed I Would need

Speaker:

to link it. Um, yeah, I think I think it did so

Speaker:

It's not just an attempt to lessen hate. It is, and if you look at James Pasternak, the

Speaker:

person who, the counselor who brought this to motion, like he has warned kids to not go to

Speaker:

school, to not participate in these anti-Israeli rallies. Like he has really whipped people

Speaker:

up along the narratives that we've been talking about today. And so he is the author of that

Speaker:

motion. You can bet your bottom dollar it is not designed to address Islamophobia whatsoever.

Speaker:

that it's strictly there to do this. And so from the media pundits to the political personalities

Speaker:

that we thought we could fucking trust, they've almost all let us down. Absolutely, absolutely.

Speaker:

It's what we've just been talking about here, just weaponization. And like, it's history

Speaker:

repeating itself. That's the, I think that's one of the most frustrating parts about watching

Speaker:

everything unfold. It's just like... how much it's all just a cycle of history. How many

Speaker:

times we've seen such things play out again. People wanna paint the narrative that like,

Speaker:

there's something unique and special and complicated and different about this. No, there isn't.

Speaker:

We've seen this kind of situation play out time and time again. I brought it up before when

Speaker:

I talk about trusty propaganda, but in justification of the Gulf Wars, there was that story of the...

Speaker:

the Iraqi soldiers were taking Kuwait babies out of their incubators and leaving them to

Speaker:

die, right? That ended up, turned out was fabricated by a think tank, right? But that got spread

Speaker:

everywhere and people were afraid and angry and all of these emotions and then how many

Speaker:

people died because of that fake story, you know? Like, the weaponization here, it's horrible

Speaker:

because like... Fuck, it's not like, this is not like a symmetrical situation. All this

Speaker:

time, like even if, like eventually, you know, Western powers get involved, stop the funding,

Speaker:

you know, like we get the things we're demanding, like every day that goes by is unimaginable

Speaker:

loss in Palestine, you know? And you can see that they're not, they don't fucking feel that,

Speaker:

they don't feel that. And I know, I know that like, at some point it does get difficult,

Speaker:

you know, like as these things draw on, it does get fucking difficult to remind yourself, hey,

Speaker:

that this is real, that what's happening here is real and devastating and you can't turn

Speaker:

away from it. Because you know, we only have like, humans have an incredible capacity to,

Speaker:

to adapt to horrible things. And like a new normal. Yeah. So it starts feeling like, oh,

Speaker:

this is normal, you know? No, it's not. Do not suppress your humanity. It's not. We need to

Speaker:

feel it. We need to feel it. And fucking fight for something better, you know? And you know,

Speaker:

actually, you know what? That brings us to the next thing, I guess, which is, you know, there's

Speaker:

been all kinds of calls, you know, for a ceasefire. Ceasefire this, ceasefire that. Not even because

Speaker:

Trudeau says, what does he call it? A humanitarian pause. You know, Bible almost ceasefire. Do

Speaker:

you have that clip? I feel like we should just throw it in here, but I could recreate it.

Speaker:

It was like cease. Uh, I mean, humanitarian pause. What I meant to say was cease escalation

Speaker:

of hostilities. Like he worked really hard to make sure he did not say the C word. Yeah.

Speaker:

They can barely say ceasefire, right? Humanitarian pause, all these things. But then again, you

Speaker:

get a ceasefire. Then what? You still have a genocide. You still have the apartheid. You

Speaker:

know, it doesn't change the realities. You know what we're not talking about? We're not talking

Speaker:

about actual solutions here. And I think that we need to talk about that because we are a

Speaker:

part of the problem. You know, Western nations created this problem. Like we've created so

Speaker:

many problems in the Middle East by going and drawing up borders for our own convenience

Speaker:

without any consideration and under the false belief in, in ethno states as something that

Speaker:

should be created in any kind of way. Like what a ridiculous concept, right? And so, you know,

Speaker:

this week I wrote an article, an op-ed for the Humber paper, where I was essentially arguing

Speaker:

in favor of the one state solution of a, but to be clear, when I say a one state solution,

Speaker:

I mean a democratic, secular state with equal rights for all. And I felt- I think socialist

Speaker:

would just be a bonus. Yeah, no, I mean, the hope is that would be socialist. But, but the

Speaker:

reason I did that was because I was like, you know, like, so frustrated because nobody can

Speaker:

tell me what happens next. Nobody can tell me what happens the day after the ceasefire. Nobody

Speaker:

can, nobody seems to have any long term solutions. Oh, like, there's a lot of people calling for

Speaker:

like the 1967 borders, right? But that just felt Oh, I've seen people just like draw a

Speaker:

line in the middle to a north end is Israel. We'll make the bottom Palestine. Everyone has

Speaker:

from the river to the sea. We're good. We're done. I can't help but feel like that is such

Speaker:

a Western colonialist solution. The idea that we draw lines on a map and that solves our

Speaker:

problems. What the fuck? It goes like it goes against like the idea of humanity that like

Speaker:

we're. that there's more that brings us in common and together with each other than is a part,

Speaker:

you know? You see like Palestinians and Jewish people, anti-Zionist Jews, hand in hand at

Speaker:

these protests and you're telling me, oh wait, we need to keep everyone separate? I just cannot

Speaker:

believe such a thing. It does not make sense and part of it is informed by the fact You

Speaker:

know, I'm Lebanese and my dad, I've been having a lot of conversations with him that I found

Speaker:

really interesting because, you know, as somebody who actually fucking lived through horrible

Speaker:

war,

Speaker:

I get perspectives from him that I'm just not getting elsewhere, right? Like he seen horrible

Speaker:

things and he... is fighting so like he is arguing so much in favor of like Palestinian liberation

Speaker:

here even though his family fought against the Palestinians right and you know I was talking

Speaker:

to him and he was telling me about how in his work there's a there's a Jewish man who looks

Speaker:

more like him than anybody who he's ever worked with. Right. And because, you know, he doesn't

Speaker:

see a lot of people who look like, I don't see a lot of people who look like me in my day

Speaker:

to day, you know, and how he was thinking and like how people always compare how they look

Speaker:

alike and stuff. And he was like, yeah, because we're the same people, you know, there's, we're

Speaker:

not different Palestinians and, and Israelis are not different. You know, They were not

Speaker:

different. And at the end of the day, the Holy Land, like it's sacred to all the Abrahamic

Speaker:

religions, not just Judaism and Islam, not just Christianity, but also many smaller, lesser

Speaker:

known religions like the Druze or the Samaritans. You know, like there, this is a land that is

Speaker:

important to many people and it should be accessible to all people. And if you create some two state

Speaker:

dividing things, then. You're just furthering this idea of separation. You're furthering

Speaker:

this idea that people are different and that they're enemies of each other and that they're

Speaker:

separate because they can't live together because they're so fundamentally different. We can't

Speaker:

gather. That's such a racist trope. Yeah. Because they don't mean Israelis can't live peacefully,

Speaker:

right? It's always that it's the Muslim population that is framed as inherently violent or Palestinians

Speaker:

in particular. And it ignores history. Horrible things happen. That's history. But people find

Speaker:

a way to build again afterwards. Lebanon went through decades of civil war. And today in

Speaker:

Lebanon, the conflicts are not on sectarian lines. They're based on the corruption of the

Speaker:

government in general. But people live together. You know, and I'm not going to paint Lebanon

Speaker:

as a fucking success story because it's anything but and honestly, and one of my big criticisms

Speaker:

is a lot is the idea of putting like, oh, the president has to be Maronite Christian and

Speaker:

the Prime Minister is Sunni and Speaker of Shia or whatever the fuck it is, right? I think

Speaker:

that's such a horrible system. I think whenever you try it, like some people are, because there's

Speaker:

arguments of creating a bi-national state, right? Where you split the power. Horrible idea. Why?

Speaker:

Because whenever you're trying to divide things on sectarian lines, it leads to the rise of

Speaker:

authoritarians like Benjamin Netanyahu, the fucking fascist that he is. People like him,

Speaker:

they don't just happen. It's the consequences. How is it that Israel got to this point? It's

Speaker:

a consequence of trying to create a nation state because it's inherently built on the idea of

Speaker:

supremacy, which is an authoritarian idea that lends itself to other authoritarian ideas that

Speaker:

lends itself to the rise of fascism. We cannot have that. This is not the kind of world that

Speaker:

we should be building. So the idea, yeah, just point of it being that like, and, and just

Speaker:

another example, of course, being Bosnia and Herzegovina where, you know, um, just a bi-national

Speaker:

nation, I still don't believe in the concept of bi-national nations either, but you know,

Speaker:

they separate, they have like three presidents of like Croatia, Serbia, and then the Bosnian

Speaker:

president. But you know. It's one country. Like. Anyways, my point being more along the lines

Speaker:

of. We like when I'm looking at this situation, I'm looking at my values. I wanted to something

Speaker:

to reflect it. And I think the idea of having a state where all peoples have equal rights

Speaker:

and freedom to practice their religions, where they live together, where, you know, we're

Speaker:

not furthering these fucking. supremacist ideas because that's what it is these colonialist

Speaker:

ideas you're not going to fix colonialism with more colonialism You know, oh there's some

Speaker:

people that say you can't call what's happening colonialism or imperialism Like you know, they

Speaker:

want to remove that literally created by the west You know, this was the brainchild of the

Speaker:

uk and Like this was literally colonialism just like the creation of all of the fucking borders

Speaker:

in the middle east were colonialism Like it's not just Israel-Palestine, it's every fucking

Speaker:

border there. It's most of the fucking Africa, you know? I think the more you point that out,

Speaker:

the more easier it becomes to understand why Canada has taken this hyper-Israeli defensive

Speaker:

position, almost to the isolating on the world stage. Right? We are really out of step and

Speaker:

a lot of people scratch their head and we've talked about the colonial imagination. But-

Speaker:

you know, defending this model and not calling it into question, or framing it as colonial,

Speaker:

you know, is super important to the Canadian state for itself to remain legitimate because

Speaker:

Bob Ray, a lot of folks, you know, you got the former UN ambassadors, Canadian ambassadors

Speaker:

to the UN, just aghast. at our recent voting record in the UN, especially when you put it

Speaker:

into context of what's happening right now, that we've actually reversed our position.

Speaker:

So much gains had been made in terms of the Palestinian diaspora and political maneuvering

Speaker:

and whatnot that's happened to get Canada to come around a little bit on its position within

Speaker:

the UN and on the state of the illegal occupation. But even before this fall's escalation in hostilities...

Speaker:

Canada started to really change its tact again. And I watched a really great six minute video

Speaker:

by Breach Media, as always I'll link that. They do a really good job of explaining the relationship

Speaker:

between Canada and Israel, and they talk on the colonial aspect as well. But really what

Speaker:

it boils down to is US interests. and aligning with US interests and wanting to appear as

Speaker:

like major players on the stage. But just to give folks how out of step of the rest of the

Speaker:

globe that we are, many states now have recalled US ambassadors or have recalled their Israeli

Speaker:

ambassadors. They have cut political ties. There's motions going to the UN very rapidly now to

Speaker:

deal with the situation and Canada has... either abstained or voted no. And on the most recent

Speaker:

one, it was so basic too. We got into a discussion about the UN and its lack of teeth, that a

Speaker:

lot of it essentially are just really statements that don't have any tangible repercussions

Speaker:

tied to them or anything. But this one here on November 12th, it was really just for Israel,

Speaker:

force Israel to fall under... the fourth Geneva Convention, right? It's Israel to accept the

Speaker:

fact that they need to apply to those standards, which means if you occupy somewhere, you need

Speaker:

to make sure that you don't bomb their fucking hospitals. So you need to make sure that they

Speaker:

have medical care. You also, there's, you know, there's all sorts of criteria that are set

Speaker:

in the Geneva Convention on how you're supposed to act if you do occupy somewhere, even though

Speaker:

you're not supposed to occupy anywhere. So just to speak to the meaning list of this shit.

Speaker:

But even Canada... Oh, before. Another one of the criteria is important to mention there

Speaker:

for this convention is that you're not supposed to be transferring your population into the

Speaker:

occupied territory. Meaning you're not supposed to be ethnically cleansing this occupied territory.

Speaker:

Right? If it's just to secure your own borders or whatever justification you've given it,

Speaker:

you're not actually supposed to take it. that's annexing it, that is then, yeah, that's ethnic

Speaker:

cleansing, then you're falling into what we're seeing genocide. Because not only have they

Speaker:

been systemically eating away at the West Bank illegally, right? This is all established illegal

Speaker:

by international law, ruled like 2004, something ridiculous. And they just incrementally taking,

Speaker:

taking. But now we've actually seen them annex Gaza, right? The complete north of Gaza is

Speaker:

like essentially under the control of the Israeli army. They say they were not going to cede

Speaker:

security of the area to it. I can't see them doing so. And so even Canada, when asked to

Speaker:

just have them at least take on the role of an occupier, the legal framework, Canada's

Speaker:

like, no, no. And we voted only with the US, Israel, Hungary, and like these three micro

Speaker:

Asia, micro Asia, these three small island nations. Pacific Island nations, which for the record,

Speaker:

the colonialism there, no one fucking talks about, but half of the Pacific Islands is still

Speaker:

owned by the France, the US or England. Not only that, but they rely on Western nations

Speaker:

to on a lot of aid and they are completely, these are islands that will soon be underwater.

Speaker:

And so they're completely beholden to Western nation support because of climate disaster.

Speaker:

So it gets even more awful as you look at it, right? So obviously their votes are being leveraged,

Speaker:

but these are the actors that Canada is standing with. Santiago, fucking Russia and Ukraine

Speaker:

voted together on this, okay? They voted that yes, as an occupier, you need to at least follow

Speaker:

these rules. Israel, will you at least agree to that? You know, like they won't, they could

Speaker:

come together on this, but Canada still stands apart? Like that is... fucking horrible. So

Speaker:

Bob Ray's really drawn the ire of this, right? He is the focal point. Obviously, he's not

Speaker:

making all of the decisions. Like this is a man whose job, like if you looked at his feed,

Speaker:

you would not know that there's a genocide happening. And he is our ambassador to the UN. He has

Speaker:

a role to play here. And someone pointed out, Michael Bookhart made a great point that if

Speaker:

you look at his feed and the last time he spoke of El Chifa was to repeat those Israeli claims

Speaker:

that there is a Hamas headquarter underneath it. And now we know 15 days after that tweet,

Speaker:

that hospital is completely surrounded by Israeli tanks, after being bombarded, after being blockaded

Speaker:

of water, medicine, and anything possible. This is the hospital that has the 39 babies in incubators

Speaker:

to have already passed away. I haven't gotten any updates as to their situation because the

Speaker:

World Health Organization can no longer really communicate with them there. Side note, what's

Speaker:

up with Hungary? Because I noticed that they're frequently a descending voice here. One of

Speaker:

those is like, you'll see a vote like this, like Canada, US, Hungary. What's up with Hungary?

Speaker:

I don't know. One of our viewers has to tweet at us and see if they can explain that to us.

Speaker:

I guess my geopolitics isn't on point here. I've noticed this with a few votes. But anyways,

Speaker:

yeah, no, it's like... We even abstained from asking for humanitarian truths. So like, you

Speaker:

know, Trudeau won't say ceasefire, but, and he says over and over again to our face that

Speaker:

yes, he supports humanitarian pause. Like that's as far as we've been able to come along. But

Speaker:

when it's time to vote on humanitarian pauses, we abstain. So those two-faced assholes, they

Speaker:

don't even, aren't even doing what they're talking about in the media. Those small concessions

Speaker:

that we get them to make in the media still don't. don't fall into any fruition. And this

Speaker:

is why what we're doing here is so important. When we talk about the West being an active

Speaker:

participant, that's what we mean. They're actively not just funding and endorsing. They're funding

Speaker:

it. They're endorsing it. They're fighting for it on a global stage. We're actively complacent

Speaker:

in this. Not more than complacent. We're participants. Which is why we need to stand up, which is

Speaker:

why we need to keep putting pressure because what a fucking contrast to what Toronto looks

Speaker:

like, you know? Like the thousands and thousands of people in the marching industries of Toronto.

Speaker:

What a fucking contrast to that. It is. And I think that's a huge miscalculation.

Speaker:

Between like what their political careers will look like down the road, I believe they're

Speaker:

all going to suffer from this. But Also, the imperialist intent behind this has suffered.

Speaker:

The masks are off and there has never been this kind of support for Palestinian resistance

Speaker:

ever. And it wasn't created by the conditions Hamas created. Israel is to be credited for

Speaker:

really waking the world up. And our guest last week... talked about this when they talk about

Speaker:

delegitimizing Israel. by sometimes forcing state actors to demonstrate the level of cruelty

Speaker:

that they will go to is an unnecessary, sorry, is a necessary step in demonstrating the whole

Speaker:

illegitimacy of the occupation. And as horrible as that might imagine, like, and just like

Speaker:

the Israeli citizens that can't be brought back. despite the incredible violence that's been

Speaker:

vised upon Gaza. We won't get those 11,000 people back plus. Like, they won't come back, but

Speaker:

they are martyrs because I believe their deaths. must have purpose now. They have to if that's

Speaker:

all we can do. is give their deaths, because we try to stop it, right? Like every day we

Speaker:

try to stop it. We can't... It's not stopping. It's getting worse. So they have to have meaning.

Speaker:

They have to. And it's why like we need to, we can't stop imagining, you know, that better

Speaker:

world. And that's why, you know, one thing I talked about in my article was the West owes

Speaker:

some serious fucking reparations, you know.

Speaker:

We need to, like, the way I see it, we need to, like, that same money that we're fucking

Speaker:

pouring into, like, these endless wars and infinite arms as much as they want. Put that money and

Speaker:

go build some fucking infrastructure and build a home, you know? Build, well, you know, fund.

Speaker:

I know, I gave you that look because, you know, we don't want to rebuild it in the way that

Speaker:

Iraq was rebuilt. No, not in the way. Obviously, like, yeah. But like we need to go and like

Speaker:

people say, oh, the one say it's impossible. No, it's not. Not like you're telling me if

Speaker:

we were to go and actually facilitate this shit with some financing, it's impossible. No. And

Speaker:

that's what we need to do because we, it's our fault. Like it is our fault. And we're so far

Speaker:

away from that conversation right now. Like what we're seeing here is we're so fucking

Speaker:

far away. No one's even like the discourse is not even close to being that. But this is why

Speaker:

like we need to be bold in these times. We need to... Like in the face of darkness, we need

Speaker:

to imagine like what we need to remind us of what it is we're fighting for. What is that

Speaker:

better world? And I sound so fucking cheesy when I say shit like that, but you know, you

Speaker:

do, but it's important because how do you fight for something if you can't envision it, right?

Speaker:

Free Palestine is just a slogan. If when asked, what does that look like? You don't have an

Speaker:

answer, right? Then you can fight for people and for justness. and all of that and understand

Speaker:

that it's still a valid fight, but it takes a different meaning and a different level when

Speaker:

you can have that vision. And in the end, you know, that vision has to be determined by the

Speaker:

Palestinian people, right? What that rebuilding looks like, what that nation looks like, needs

Speaker:

to center the voices of Palestinian people because they've been completely erased for so long.

Speaker:

Right. And. Although there's clearly so much work to do in terms of bringing politicians

Speaker:

around or whatever that work is going to end up looking like, I am absolutely buoyed by

Speaker:

the fact that especially youth, are not going to let this go. And I think as awful as everything

Speaker:

has been, I believe we are closer to realizing a free Palestine than we ever have been. and

Speaker:

nobody wants to have gotten here this way. but all other efforts to bring people out in the

Speaker:

way that they've come out, right? And holding the line the way that the diaspora has been

Speaker:

begging us to do before this happened, before it escalated to this point, but it didn't,

Speaker:

right? We didn't do enough before it was too late. And like, we don't have to hold onto

Speaker:

that. That's not like to like sit with guilt, but it is certainly to like double our efforts

Speaker:

at this point. and not have. Like that discussion we had earlier Santiago about not making compromises

Speaker:

in those visions. because socialists are always accused of fighting for utopia, right? Like

Speaker:

framed as an unachievable utopic vision. But folks can't allow that to happen in this case,

Speaker:

right? Because there's been so much compromise and concessions made. And as we go through

Speaker:

this, there'll be so many people that want to water down that vision or colonize it. And

Speaker:

to maintain the Palestinian vision of what a free Palestine looks like is so important.

Speaker:

That's why I really get upset when people try to shut down from the river to the sea, because

Speaker:

it's not about what they think it means. Maybe some people have been told that's what it means,

Speaker:

and so that it scares them, but that's not what it fucking means. But it's been weaponized

Speaker:

because of the borders it suggests. An undoing of what has been done. And that is unacceptable.

Speaker:

to imperialists to go back to a full and recognized Palestinian freedom from the Jordan River to

Speaker:

the Mediterranean Sea like they were. Full restitution. Right? That is why that is being criminalized,

Speaker:

because that can't be normalized. That can't be the vision. That would be unacceptable to

Speaker:

U.S. interests in controlling oil in the region. And that's the bottom line. That is a wrap

Speaker:

on another episode of Blueprints of Disruption. Thank you for joining us. Also, a very big

Speaker:

thank you to the producer of our show, Santiago Halu-Quintero. Blueprints of Disruption is

Speaker:

an independent production operated cooperatively. You can follow us on Twitter at BPofDisruption.

Speaker:

If you'd like to help us continue disrupting the status quo, please share our content. And

Speaker:

if you have the means, consider becoming a patron. Not only does our support come from the progressive

Speaker:

community, so does our content. So reach out to us and let us know what or who we should

Speaker:

be amplifying. So until next time, keep disrupting.