Anthony Perl:

Shared responsibility. Why workshop success depends on everyone playing their part. Join passionate automotive trainer and coach Andrew Uglow as he examines the common technician complaint, the breakdown of shared responsibility in modern workshops. In this episode, you'll learn why workshop success requires both technical excellence and emotional intelligence. Discover how to create accountability without blame and understand why technicians and management. Must share ownership of outcomes Along the way, you'll hear stories about the automotive industry's complexity and how it demands a new approach to teamwork and why the old us versus them mentality is killing workshop profitability. I'm your co-host Anthony Pearl, and this is the Frictionless Workshop podcast. Let's get cranking. Andrew. Here's my. Favorite quote that you hear it in all jobs, and maybe it's because we're getting a little bit older, but there's no good people anymore that that specifically in an area that is quite technical and with this scale of development that happens with cars and managing everything to do with them these days, there's no good people anymore. That's something that comes up all the time, isn't it?

Andrew Uglow:

It's funny you should say that. And at risk of, of getting on a soapbox and, and perhaps this is why I do a podcast to, to get on a soapbox, but when you've been in doing something, anything for a long time, you, you, you start to notice patterns, right? You start to notice things, things recur. There's, there's cycles to how things operate. Just looking back when I first started in the industry forever ago, it was really hard to find good people and then it became, it's really hard to find people. And then, and that's what we were hearing from management. That's what we're hearing from workshop owners. That's what we're hearing from industry, industry bodies. Oh, there's, it's really hard to find good people, or it's really hard to find people. Now I'm hearing this from other technicians. I like, the people that I work with are peanuts. You know, they're really not very good. They, they, I, I can't use the exact words because, you know, language warnings on podcasts, but they have a lot of opportunity to improve. And I question, you know. Whether they should be in the industry at all, let alone are they employable. It feels like a Monty Python skill. It's not what it was in my day exactly, but, but this is the thing, like if it was one person, I'd just go, okay, well you're just really unlucky to have got a bad dude or dude that in your workplace. But when I start to hear again, and again, and again from foreman, from technicians, you know, we've got insert person and they're useless. They're absolutely useless. I end up fixing all of their problems. I end up spending all this extra time. I go back to the, the other things that we've spoken about. I'm not getting paid any more to fix their problems. I'm not getting any recognition because of all the, the things that I do. So you can sort of see that these are recurring loops and cycles within cycles. And so there's this lament, you know, where have all the good people gone. And the flip side is these young people these days, you know, that's, that's what they said about me when I joined the trade. Young people these days look at, they have no discipline. They've got, you know, and you go back and track, like honestly, go back and track the things that tick you off as a service manager. What are they? Okay, so we've got mistakes. Technically we've got lack of attention, but for also got, they didn't turn up, they didn't ring me. All of these basic human skills. They just disappeared at lunchtime because they were stressed, because mental health, because in the war, in Ukraine, because global warming, because who knows? And we have rules in how we operate. And these people don't seem to fit within these rules. They don't seem to hold the same values. They don't seem to care about their reputation. They don't seem to perceive the world the way that we perceive the world. And so this whole idea that plays out for that at a management level. But when we look at this through technician lenses, this guy's getting away with everything. He does this, he does this, he doesn't do that. He should have done this, da da da da. I'm doing all the right things and we're getting paid the same. Hang on a minute, hang on a minute. And so you can appreciate, you know, what's that saying? Bad company corrupts good habits That if I have suboptimal or underperformers in my business, there is a time period at which we want to upskill them or, or get rid of them because they will do more harm than not having a warm body there. And sometimes, and I know businesses that do this, I go, I just need a warm body. They create all of this hell. And without that, I just simply can't cope with the amount of work. 'cause I don't have enough people. And the hope is that we can find or upskill them enough, we can progress them enough. We can take them from being profoundly suboptimal to being semi suboptimal. And that's kind of the thing. And yet possibly, but when I start hearing this from technicians that I don't know about you, but that raises some red flags for me. The people that are working with these people. Even if they've been trade, like I've had a 30 year apprentice come to me and go, all of the other apprentices in my workshop are just horrendous. I dunno why they put them on like, okay, that I don't know about you, but that throws up a whole variety of questions and red flags for me. So going back to the testing, the idea is there in fact no good people anymore. You know, the frustration of working with not good people, you know, where have all the good people gone, young people these days, all of those versions of that claim. Is it true? And I'm gonna go, yeah, it's true without question. We, we don't just have a gill shortage in terms of the number of people available. The people that we have also don't have the skills. If feel like we have a people shortage and we have a skills that people don't have. Shortage or issue. And so it's a two part thing. And so is there a drop in quality of talent in the workshops? I'm gonna go, yeah. Yeah, there is. And you take that idea and then you layer over the non incremental, the massive exponential change in technology that's come through cars. And even if you go back 10 years, you know, what's changed for plumbers? What's changed for carpenters? What's changed for, you know, air conditioning techs? What's changed? Like they're sure there's changes, but nothing like the automotive industry has seen like nothing. Nothing at all. And so not only do we, we now have people that perhaps don't have the people skills, don't have the values, don't have, uh, comprehension. If they've come from another part of the world, perhaps they don't share the same ideals and the same concepts of what's acceptable and what's not for us. And we see that a lot too, that it's not just a people clash, it's a cultural clash. And that's to, is, that's a whole nother kettle of fish, right? There's, there's a whole nother level of skill. If I'm a manager slash leader, how do I lead through that? We have that, but we also have the change in technology. And again, automotive, tragic, automotive light bulb. I, I had the benefit of seeing this incremental change. We went from cars being largely mechanical systems to, with a few electrical circuits, you know, lights and charging systems and spark ignition stuff to cars being an entirely networked vehicle, highly networked vehicle with a few mechanical components. Yeah, we still got brakes. Electric motor. Now that does the put. Hopefully

Anthony Perl:

we still got

Andrew Uglow:

brakes. Yeah, yeah, yeah, absolutely. That's a trivial detail. You know, that we have mechanical doors that still open and close. You know, they aren't curtains or force fields or something that keep us in the car. You know, we haven't gone that far yet, but there's a few mechanical things in the car, but it's now an electrical electronic device with a few mechanical bit. And so I've seen that change gradually over time for people who step into the industry today, like that's like drinking from a fire hose, you know, wrapping your lips around the end of that nozzle and turning that hose on high. It's a lot of information to get down in a really short space of time. And so that just compounds what the individual is experiencing in trying to find their feet in an industry and underperforming while they do it.

Anthony Perl:

And I think that the challenge here as well is that people coming from. Different backgrounds in terms of, you know, if you came in as a technician 40 years ago, your perception of how you learn things and experience things along the way is gonna be very different to someone who's just getting their first job now because they're being trained on a completely new way of doing things and a new type of engine. So their experience is always going to be different. So they're not gonna make 'em like they used to because. They can't and they shouldn't.

Andrew Uglow:

Right. And, and, and so like, if we dive into this and we start to look at things a little bit deeper than the surface level, and usually this is expressed in frustration. I've gotta fix up all this person's screw ups, I've constantly, you know, holding their hand and wiping up after them. There's two big chunks that, that are at play. The first chunk is the environment that they're working in. People respond to the environment they work in. And if I've got a suboptimal environment, if I'm applying financial management. Methodologies to humans, I'm never gonna get a good result. I just can't. It's not possible. So I need to have leadership. I need to have a, an environment that is suitable for humans, suitable for people that considers those people things. Sure I have to make a profit. Don't get me wrong, they're parallel, but. I, I just find that the environment that often these people find themselves in is not useful. It doesn't serve, it doesn't help, doesn't help the business, doesn't help the customers. It certainly doesn't help the individual. The second element is, the reality is that people today aren't the same. They just aren't. Different culture, different world. Like we talk about people being tech dependent, as in technology dependent. Like I remember a long time ago on a galaxy far, far away, when there was no internet, we never had it. You were left to your own devices to be resourceful to figure it out. Now I just asked chat, Hey, chat. How I fix this car? Well, Andrew, you need to da da da da. And it may or may not be correct, like AI's been known to hallucinate once or twice before, and if I give it bad information, I get a bad response back. And so now it's chat's fault, not mine. But the reality is that people don't have the same foundations. The behaviors that we see are symptoms of things that aren't there. And so the reality is, if I want this person to perform, I'm gonna have to do the in install. You know, it's like complaining that my car didn't come with leather seats. Well. So it doesn't come with leather seats. If you want leather seats, you're gonna have to put them in yourself. You know? You want the people to hold these values, you're gonna have to install them. That's the reality. Sucks to be you. Sure. But that's the reality. Like if you want this, you're gonna have to do the work. And so this becomes a problem because one, we don't have in the industry, we don't have good systems and processes for doing the install. We put them through an apprenticeship and that does some work. That's good. That's useful, but it's, it's incomplete. It's insufficient. We certainly don't have any mechanism for doing the install for these values and skills and behaviors and stuff. We have compliance, but that's not, you know, that's like using a hammer to fix everything. It's not gonna work well. We don't have any training for people in the business for how to do this. We don't have any industry-wide things that develop this, that look at people and go, look, this is how we need to operate. If you wanna work in this environment, you need these skills. So let's go and develop those skills and the people skills, not the technical skills. Sure, we do technical skills really well, but we just don't do the other side really well. And so back to this complaint, we can either keep bagging our head against the wall. Having a soy la la moment over it and complaining, oh, we gonna, or we can suck it up. You know, we can go, okay, so they don't have this, how am I gonna get that to them? And we get the pushback, oh, well they don't want to, they don't this, they don't. Yeah. Okay. That's all very external. What are you gonna do about it? You know, who's got two thumbs and holds of responsibility here? Well, that's leadership, that's management. So if you are the service manager, you are the foreman. This is on you. If we go back historically and look at how Foreman did, sure. They were the technical gurus. They were the knowledge holders, they were the problem solvers. They were the ones that did stuff, but they also led the culture. And we don't train them how to do that anymore. That's gone. Foreman is Andrew, how much longer Andrew customers waiting? Andrew, why isn't that job done? And we have this whole financial framework over managing people and it just sucks. Just as awful. It's inappropriate. It's like using a hammer to fix everything and sure, there's things that need a hammer. There's things that need a hammer and a run up. There's also things that need, things that need finesse, things that don't need a hammer.

Anthony Perl:

Hey, everyone just interrupting for a moment to remind you that the Frictionless Workshop Podcast is brought to you by Solutions Culture. For details on how to get in touch with Andrew, consult the show notes and don't forget to subscribe so you don't miss an episode of the podcast. Now, back to the show. How you sell it in is everything, right, and the funny thing is, is they know how to do that when it comes to the car. It's how they do it with the individual. Because you know, we were talking before, come in and you go, okay, say to me, you need new breaks. Now if they say you need new breaks, but. You need it in the next six months is very different to the urgency of saying, look, your breaks are down to the final bits. You need to get your breaks done in the next week. Otherwise you risk having a serious accident. Yeah. And selling it to me that way goes, okay, let's do the breaks now. Let's get onto it. I can't put this off. And it's the same way that you have to deal with. Technicians in wanting them to develop and do more things along the way. It's how you sell it into them. When you get that complaint saying you know that you're just banging your head against a brick wall, that they're not really that interested how you sell it might be the key to what the response is from them.

Andrew Uglow:

Sure. I'm gonna offer, what we have is, if you imagine two axes, right? The first axes is technical skill. Technical ability. I like the word ability better. 'cause ability is skill times knowledge, right? It's what I can actually produce. So we have this machine that over time produces technical ability. Okay. So if we look at the scale of things and, and where we expect our people to be, we expect 'em to be high technical ability. And so that's efficiency, that's professionalism, that's fixed versus visits. All those metrics that we track. Conversely, for leadership, we don't have really, we have management as the other horizontal, and it's kind of one or the other. We have high management skill or high technical ability. And if we zoom in and go back to the idea of, well, who's responsible for this? Sure. It's the management. Without question management of the business, management of the workshop, without question, the buck stops with them. And, well, what have they put in place to do this? Because the service manager's got a thousand different things to manage and putting out fires and doing all the stuff that they do. What system have we got in place to look after this? And there's some, there's some stuff and there's some leadership that, that we see coming through and I go, you know, 80 20, 20% of businesses do this. Well, 80% not yet. I go back into the piece that's missing in all this. The piece that's been overlooked in all this is the foreman who has the face time with the technicians, the foreman who has the influence with the technicians, the foreman who has the ability to do the install of the values and the behaviors and the the methods, and the way we roll the cultural things. Well, that's the foreman's job. Sure. They have the technical responsibility as well, but we've never trained them to do the people part. We've never given them people ability. We've given them technical ability. We've never given them people ability. And so this is one of the things I feel like I'm, I'm on my soapbox all over again, but this is one of the things that, what's the word I'm looking for? I confounds me is why haven't we trained our, our foreman on how to do this? Like, have we expect high technical ability yet? Great. But that's not their role. And that alone is not their role. And using them for that is to underutilize them. The reality is we should be teaching them to how to influence people, how to deal with the human side of things, how to install values, how to install culture, how to install professionalism, how to do micro learning. So that, and again, back to the idea that I get feedback from Foreman, I've told him again and again and again and again, okay, so you keep telling him, telling isn't working, what else should you do? And they'd look at me blankly. 'cause they don't have anything else. No one's explained to them. This is how you install information into someone who doesn't have it. They don't have a framework for that. They don't have a tactic for that. They don't even have good practice for that. We just, just get outta hammer and start banging. And we're surprised we're not.

Anthony Perl:

We just keep work. And how often is it that people could just keep explaining the same thing in the same way? And that's not going to make it any clearer for someone who doesn't know. You have to change your approach to how you're delivering that information and the explanation and the information you make available to them to be able to learn. Otherwise, you're just repeating.

Andrew Uglow:

Right, and, and I go back to what's your goal here? Really as of this is what's your outcome? Are you just there to make money? Well, we've been doing that for decades and look at the state of their people and I think that we need to perhaps have a good hard look. And this plays right up and down. The, the idea of leadership is have a good hard look. 'cause if we don't take care of people, no one else is going to. We can't expect people to come into our business with all the pieces that we want them to have because that doesn't exist anymore. So we can so about it and go, oh, this and all that, and we can cycle through people and we can invest a million dollars plus a year on staff turn if we want to, or maybe we could invest less than that and start to work about developing the people side of things and make that part of people's. KPI. Hey, look, Anthony, we want you to learn how to manage people. We want you to learn how to install culture. We want you to learn how to do micro learning. Anthony, we want you to be able to manage customers as part of your role as a, a senior tech or a foreman or a controller. Andrew, we want you to be able lead millennials. Well, let's, let me show you how you do that, because. Until we do, I don't know about you, but I just see a self repeating cycle. I see the same complaint that we've been banging on about for 30 years plus happening again and again and again. I mean,

Anthony Perl:

I think if you were to jump in a time machine and go back 30 or 40 years and you were to have this conversation with them, they'd probably be saying exactly the same thing. Oh, we just can't get good people anymore. It's a story that we've been telling for so long that it almost becomes compulsory to tell the story rather than to address the problem.

Andrew Uglow:

Right. It's, yeah, it's easier to have a complaint than it is to, what is it? I must do something always achieves more than something must be done. And so I've taken this very personally. Anthony, just as we wrap up this idea, this is not a small, trivial thing for me. This has been burning my butt for years. Like, how do we solve this problem? How do we get around this? How do we facilitate outstanding financial performance for businesses when all of the things are tightening? Because they are like, pick one. Like this is what I'm saying about automotive. If you can be successful in automotive with everything stacked against you and still be successful, what can't you do? So given that environment, how do we run better? How do we operate better? How do we, given that it's, it's all the things that it is, how do we do that well? And ultimately it comes down to the technicians. In any workshop, the quality of my technicians are directly proportional to the profitability of my business. Sure I need good, efficient management. Sure, I need great systems. Sure I need great customer service people. That all helps amplify what the technicians do. But if I don't have good techs, I'm nowhere. And I go back to, well, whose job is it not to train the technicians? Whose job is it to develop the technicians? And that goes back to the service manager. And more specifically, it goes back to the foreman. Sure we want foreman that are high technical without question, but we need them to be high people as well. And we get that by training them and there's nothing there is absolutely zero. I can send them to TAFE and they can do a cert four and workplace leadership or workplace business management or workplace, whatever it is, and okay, nice piece of paper. And they'll learn some stuff, but it doesn't cut the mustard. It's not what they need. So I've gone and doubled down on this. I have far out, I have invested enormous amounts of time, research, energy. The reason I know all these complaints is I've been testing this over years with people, and so I've developed essentially what is a foreman school. How do you get your foreman up in the scale of people ability when you send them to foreman's school? Like you would send them to trade school to learn the technical, well send them to foreman school to learn the the other side, the people side. And so we've developed a program called the Professional Foreman Method, literally right about to launch. So this is, if you're watching this or listening to this, this is October, early October. We plan to be launching by the end of the month and taking enrollments for, how do you train your foreman? Well, this is how you train your foreman. This is, I'm gonna argue the first time that I know of that there is a foreman school that we teach, foreman and controllers how to manage people. Not how to manage business, not how to manage technical ability. We'll help with that for sure, but this is how to manage people how to, or better, how to lead people, how to install the culture, how to have the challenging conversations, how to get these millennials to do what you want them to do. Well, what if they wanted to do it? Wouldn't that be easier? Wouldn't that be a better solution? Instead of me pushing these people, wouldn't it be better if I led them, if I facilitated them doing their job? Wouldn't that be a far more sensible way to approach this? Instead of push, push, push, push, bang, bang, bang, or the hammer. Because it's not working. What we're doing now positively is not sure we get some results, but gee whiz, for what effort? What time, what cost?

Anthony Perl:

That almost brings our technician series to a powerful conclusion. But Andrew's got one more critical insight to. In our next episode, we are diving into what happens when the diagnostic approach meets real world implementation. We'll explore the complaint that management doesn't understand what it's really like and reveal practical strategies for bridging the communication gap between technicians. And decision makers. Andrew shares specific tools for translating technical challenges into business language and creating win-win solutions that actually work. Plus, we'll look at workshops that have successfully implemented these challenges and the dramatic results they've achieved. The implementation gap drops in a couple of weeks, so make sure you are subscribed so you never miss an episode. This is the Frictionless Workshop Podcast, produced by podcast done for you online. All details in the show notes.