Hello and welcome back to Data Driven. In this episode,
Speaker:Frank and Andy interview Aviad Harrell, managing partner
Speaker:at Team 8. Aviad sheds light on team 8's unique
Speaker:model of partnering with founders even before they have fully formed
Speaker:ideas, emphasizing the importance of critical thinking,
Speaker:understanding problems intimately, and having a systematic process for
Speaker:success. Aviad's insights into the evolution of venture
Speaker:capital capital and the AI revolution are sure to intrigue and
Speaker:inspire. Now on to the show.
Speaker:Alright. Hello, and welcome back to Data Driven, the podcast where we explore the
Speaker:emergent fields of AI, data science, and, of course, data
Speaker:engineering. With me on this epic road trip down the information
Speaker:superhighway of data.
Speaker:Andy Leonard. How's it going, Andy? It's going pretty good, Frank. How are you,
Speaker:sir? I'm doing alright. You and I are both suffering from the
Speaker:pollen wave that has hit, Virginia, Maryland.
Speaker:We're at least half of Maryland. The southern the the kind of coastal
Speaker:half. I was in Pittsburgh. Out of town, and I was up in you were
Speaker:north. I was in Pittsburgh, and Yeah. Everyone up there is complaining about
Speaker:allergies, but, yeah, it wasn't at the degree. It didn't bother me. And then it's
Speaker:literally as soon as I crossed interstate 81, in
Speaker:Hagerstown, boom. Like, it just hit like a wave.
Speaker:But with me, with us today is
Speaker:Aviad Harel. He is a, management partner
Speaker:at team 8, and, he's gonna tell
Speaker:us all about what team 8 is because I've heard it used, I've heard it
Speaker:referenced, but I'd like to know more. Welcome to the show, Aviad. Hi, Frank.
Speaker:Hi, Andy. Happy to be on your show today. Cool. Good to have you.
Speaker:So It was my pleasure. You are, you're an
Speaker:investor. You're, an adviser, and
Speaker:you have a history of of being a founder, actually. You you
Speaker:were a founder and COO of
Speaker:Sisense. So tell us about what is team 8? Let's start
Speaker:there. Yep. So team
Speaker:8 is, is a VC to begin with. It's
Speaker:an Israeli based VC, quite large one,
Speaker:but, it has, a spill. It's a VC with
Speaker:a spill, and I'll try to explain what, makes it, unique.
Speaker:We at Teammate, we really like to partner with
Speaker:founders very early in their journey.
Speaker:Sometimes before they have a very established idea of what they're going to
Speaker:build, we usually look for founders
Speaker:that, we we become big believers
Speaker:in in their capabilities, and
Speaker:we are also interested in founders that are interested in the
Speaker:same verticals that we are interested.
Speaker:Part of our day to day is to build
Speaker:thesis for ideas. What does it mean? We don't like to be
Speaker:passive. We don't like to sit on our on our chairs and waiting for,
Speaker:founding, teams to come to us and pitch us ideas. We
Speaker:do that, and we like that, but we also really, really
Speaker:like to be very active on the ideation part. So even
Speaker:before we find founders, we work very hard to build our own thesis in
Speaker:our, in our specific verticals that we're interested
Speaker:in. But we're building the thesis in a way
Speaker:that is like we are going to start that company.
Speaker:So we come up with an idea. We connect to
Speaker:the market, to specific companies that potentially can become design
Speaker:partners or even customers, of that idea, and
Speaker:we try to validate that idea together with them.
Speaker:If we were able to validate the idea
Speaker:in in in a very systematic way, and we have a very
Speaker:elaborated, book of processes, how we, validate
Speaker:our teasers. And then we also found the right
Speaker:founders that, we feed them, they feed us, and they feed the
Speaker:teasers. Then we usually don't just bet
Speaker:on them, we triple bet on them. It starts with the size
Speaker:of the check. Usually, we invest in
Speaker:precede, rounds. We invest 2 x to
Speaker:5 x of the average check size in these founders and
Speaker:ideas. We do not invest
Speaker:in many companies every year. We invest in only very few
Speaker:because we want to give them our full attention. And lastly, at
Speaker:team 8, we have, an establishment we call
Speaker:the, the platform. It's actually a group
Speaker:of 85 professionals on the payroll of teammate that
Speaker:includes, developers and product people and
Speaker:sales people and business people, that they have two purposes
Speaker:in, teammate. 1, help us in, validating
Speaker:thesis, and secondly started
Speaker:it. So from the
Speaker:perspective of the founders, if we decided,
Speaker:to partner with them, we give them large
Speaker:checks very early on in the process. They give they get
Speaker:the bandwidth of, the managing partner such as
Speaker:myself and my, partner, and they're augmented,
Speaker:at day 0 with the platform, the 85, professional,
Speaker:part of, teammate. This is a very expensive motion.
Speaker:We were able to execute on that motion
Speaker:if and only if we're able to build a very strong conviction
Speaker:on the problem, the solution, and the founders. So
Speaker:we do very little, but the little we do, we
Speaker:triple bet on that. So this is this is
Speaker:my way to explain the difference, or the
Speaker:different motion of teammate versus a more typical VCs.
Speaker:Right. And, you know, VCs, at least in America at
Speaker:least in the Valley, the Valley model, it sounds like you're very different than the
Speaker:Valley model. It seems like you're you're kind of, like, a step or
Speaker:2 ahead of you you bet. And that's not fair to the valley based ones.
Speaker:Right? Like, because there there's a stereotype. Right? Like, and and I'm sure they're they're
Speaker:painfully aware of the survey. But it sounds like you don't just invest in the
Speaker:idea, but you also invest in the people. Right? Correct. Correct.
Speaker:I I I would not be, very quick to say that,
Speaker:the Silicon Valley VCs do not invest in people. They do invest in
Speaker:people, But, we invest
Speaker:in people very early. Right. And,
Speaker:we take bigger chances because we build bigger conviction
Speaker:more than average at least on the problem statement and the solution for that.
Speaker:Mhmm. Nice. That makes a lot of sense.
Speaker:No. And I don't mean to track the value of these. It's
Speaker:just it's a different what you're doing is is I think being people first,
Speaker:if that's if that's a a a good way to think of it. How did
Speaker:you come to that I'm sorry. Go ahead. Yeah. We're big
Speaker:believers in, people. You know?
Speaker:I think the number one, attribute to success of a
Speaker:venture is the people we partner with and the
Speaker:market. Right? These are the 2 most important, attributes, to
Speaker:that. So we try to partner with the best founders we can. Now best
Speaker:founders we can partner with is a combination of few qualities.
Speaker:1st, the the people, and secondly, they're matched
Speaker:to the teases, to the idea that they are after.
Speaker:Interesting. Interesting. How did you
Speaker:come to that model of being kind of a people first approach as opposed
Speaker:to what I've seen as more of a product
Speaker:based approach or an offering based approach?
Speaker:Yeah. So first, teammate, was
Speaker:founded way before I joined. I joined a little bit over a year ago, so
Speaker:it's not a a model I invented. But I think,
Speaker:this model, was
Speaker:created based on few things. 1st, I think
Speaker:the people that founded team 8 basically,
Speaker:had a very good understanding of a specific vertical they started
Speaker:with and cybersecurity. Teammate was found by
Speaker:the x 8200, commander. It was the the
Speaker:intelligence, technical intelligence unit out of IDF.
Speaker:And, he and his team came with,
Speaker:a set of understanding deep understanding of, the
Speaker:vertical, and, they wanted to
Speaker:be very active in regards to what they're going to build and not just
Speaker:wait for, ideas to come to them. So they started to build few teasers,
Speaker:and they part of the process of building or or building a
Speaker:factory to build, startups, they also started
Speaker:to, meet or date potential, founders.
Speaker:And, they had a very good initial success, And I think this
Speaker:is what, set, set the structure going on
Speaker:forward of, how, things are, taking
Speaker:place at Team 8. Well, that whole that whole seeking
Speaker:out people, I know I know that's what other, VCs do.
Speaker:But most of the time, you know, those of us on the outside of the
Speaker:market, hear of people going to pitch
Speaker:their ideas in a shark tank kind of way. Is that on my side
Speaker:or your side? So that on my side, that's what
Speaker:I hear. You know, my understanding is Got a little bit dumb. Invested.
Speaker:So you got a little bit disconnected. Technical glitches. Yeah.
Speaker:So from my side, what I see as a person on the outside is
Speaker:that usually engagement with venture capitalists
Speaker:involves someone like me going to someone like you
Speaker:and sharing an idea and creating a pension oh, I'm sorry.
Speaker:I still see him. Oh, no. I still see you. Can you
Speaker:still hear me, Andy? I hear both of you. Yeah. And I've had a couple
Speaker:of glitches over here, but that's kinda normal. Am I back in
Speaker:sync? You look like you are.
Speaker:Okay. Can you hear me? Typing. I can hear you. Can you hear
Speaker:me talking when and see my mouse moving into the system? You for,
Speaker:few to, 10 of seconds. Okay. Can you hear me now?
Speaker:Daphne says she can hear me. Okay. Weird. Oh,
Speaker:well. Sorry about He's moving. Yeah. I can see
Speaker:I think the video is good. You come in and go. I'm trying to check
Speaker:my network. It seems okay. Yeah. It's probably me.
Speaker:I'll let my team Teams. I like blaming Teams. Hold on. Frank, you know what
Speaker:I you got the gist of what I'm about to do. Yeah.
Speaker:So I will I will ask in behalf of Andy because it's okay. So
Speaker:from the outside, right, and and to be clear, last time I had any kind
Speaker:of interactions with, venture capitalists would have been the dotcom
Speaker:boom. Right? So this is, like, a lifetime ago. And,
Speaker:one of the things is, like, when when we when people tend to when people
Speaker:on the outside of the industry, they tend to think of something like Shark
Speaker:Tank. Right? Where a a a, entrepreneur
Speaker:goes to a bunch of venture capitalists, and they do a pitch deck or a
Speaker:pitch. Has that changed? Like, what is what is what is kinda normal for the
Speaker:industry now?
Speaker:Can you still hear me?
Speaker:Oh, wow. Okay. He's not moving, so you come and go.
Speaker:Okay. Yeah. Let me prep a Google Meet
Speaker:just in case.
Speaker:I think now it's a little bit better. Now it's better.
Speaker:Yeah. Maybe we should turn off cameras just to be We
Speaker:can. Yeah. Sorry about that, guys. No worries.
Speaker:Alright. How's that? Can you I can
Speaker:hear you perfectly. Yeah. Excellent. Alright.
Speaker:This is gonna happen over the course of 8 years of podcasting.
Speaker:Alright. 1st time. Go ahead, Andy. We'll we'll take it from the top.
Speaker:Okay. So my question was, you know, I'm I'm a person outside of,
Speaker:venture capital. I've not interacted with, with with
Speaker:venture capitalists at all. And my understanding has
Speaker:been that the way you engage with a venture capitalist
Speaker:is you do a pitch deck. You go to a meeting that's a lot like
Speaker:the TV show Shark Tank, and they ask
Speaker:questions and you give answers. And, you know, at the end
Speaker:of that, they you know, the venture capitalists go thumbs up,
Speaker:thumbs down. And what I hear you saying, it sounds like that, yes,
Speaker:you're doing that, but you're also actively seeking out
Speaker:founders and that that's a bit different from what we've
Speaker:what we've expected. Okay. I think Cool. I think I think you
Speaker:described it, well. We seek out founders sometimes even
Speaker:before they have ideas. And in parallel, we also seek
Speaker:ideas regardless of founders. Now that's an interesting
Speaker:approach going after the that you know, I've never heard anybody say
Speaker:that before, that you're looking for, I guess, you're looking
Speaker:for leadership or, enthusiasm or
Speaker:intelligence or some combination of all of the above. You're you're
Speaker:looking for a person, and then y'all are all
Speaker:gonna get together, you and that person and your team,
Speaker:and you're gonna come up with an idea for that person to
Speaker:lead. Is that accurate? It is. It is. I just,
Speaker:even make it more, more,
Speaker:concrete. We look for entrepreneurs. Right? Entrepreneur
Speaker:is a little bit, of mixture of of, everything you listed,
Speaker:earlier. Uh-huh. But it also has the x factor.
Speaker:You know, someone that, will be able to get,
Speaker:in the room from the cracks in the floor. Right?
Speaker:So that x factor is a must,
Speaker:a must be, fairy dust on the qualities you described earlier.
Speaker:But, yeah, we're focused on that. Interesting.
Speaker:Interesting. What is what is kind of like
Speaker:because last time I interacted with any kind of venture capital would have been during
Speaker:the dotcom boom in the late nineties. Yep. How how has the industry
Speaker:changed since then? Well, this is this is
Speaker:a a a great, question. So,
Speaker:I'll try to answer it from, my own experience. So,
Speaker:before I joined team 8, I was a
Speaker:founder of, business intelligence and analytics company called Sisense.
Speaker:I started it 18 years ago. It's a long
Speaker:period of time when I say it, like that, and I spend there 15 years,
Speaker:holding, all the various position, you can,
Speaker:think of. I remember few things
Speaker:from the early days of, Sisense. 1st,
Speaker:it feels like it was way
Speaker:less professional than it is today. In the
Speaker:sense that when me and my cofounders
Speaker:wanted to start a Sisense, we were completely clueless.
Speaker:Right? We were completely clueless of what it means to start a
Speaker:company. We were completely clueless what it means to build a product.
Speaker:We were completely clueless of what it means to define a product
Speaker:or to build a team or to raise money.
Speaker:Today, many years after, I meet
Speaker:many teams and I see that the level of understanding,
Speaker:and, the knowledge that the teams, the founders that I
Speaker:meet today have is a few orders of
Speaker:magnitude, higher than what I had when I
Speaker:started. So this is one thing. Secondly,
Speaker:the first money I raised to my company was half a
Speaker:$1,000,000, I think. It was a long time ago.
Speaker:It's a different ball game today. Yeah. It used to be a lot of money.
Speaker:It used to be a lot of money, and I gave
Speaker:a big equity chunk for that half a1000000 dollars
Speaker:worth of, funding. Today, it's a different ball game.
Speaker:This is pay more for much smaller part
Speaker:of, of, the company. So this is
Speaker:a a second, difference. And lastly,
Speaker:I think the ecosystem is much more mature. The
Speaker:ecosystem of startups and that, that
Speaker:cradle the the the founders and support them. Right? I'll give you a
Speaker:few example. When you want to start,
Speaker:a venture and you raise money from any VC
Speaker:by the way, many many VCs are really good
Speaker:VCs in, provide you,
Speaker:air coverage of building your, company. They will,
Speaker:introduce you to relevant potential, customer or design partners.
Speaker:They will help you with future found of running funding.
Speaker:Sorry. They will introduce to you
Speaker:potential, key hires to your company. They used to
Speaker:do it in the past, but, in in much less systemized
Speaker:manner. So I think that on one
Speaker:in one way, it's easier or more systematic,
Speaker:to be a founder these days. However, it's more competitive
Speaker:than it used to be back then. Interesting.
Speaker:What do you think has driven that the kind of the evolution? Just a
Speaker:few aside from inflation and being that, you know, half
Speaker:$1,000,000 isn't what it used to be. Well, I I think many
Speaker:factors. 1st, you know, the industry
Speaker:matured in in I don't know. 20
Speaker:years ago, there weren't so many tech
Speaker:startups out there. And as a
Speaker:derivative of that, there wasn't so so
Speaker:much of, institutional money to be invested in
Speaker:it. It wasn't a thing to invest in start up. It was, more of
Speaker:a hobby. Now it's more, matured
Speaker:and incorporated in many ways.
Speaker:So the the industry, like many other industries, matured
Speaker:along, the way. Now, secondly,
Speaker:the world is becoming more tech, savvy or more
Speaker:tech driven, compared to what it was, 20 years
Speaker:ago. Right? That's true. Look at the Fortune,
Speaker:500, companies. Who are the companies that now lead the Fortune
Speaker:500 compared to who led the Fortune 500,
Speaker:least 20 years ago? Yeah. It's definitely tech heavy
Speaker:now. Yep. Yes. Absolutely. No. Those are
Speaker:good points. Those are good points. It's interesting to see how
Speaker:just unintended consequences of, you know, things becoming more
Speaker:tech, heavy has changed things like the, you know,
Speaker:the S and P and, as well as the weighting of
Speaker:the Dow Jones, but also kind of our daily lives, but also,
Speaker:you know, the better venture capital industry. Like, it's a it's more sounds like it's
Speaker:more of a proper discipline now as opposed to, you know,
Speaker:a hobby. Like, you know, kinda like we said, it was kinda,
Speaker:but now it's more of a professional discipline with with with
Speaker:proper kind of structure and form
Speaker:around it, I guess, would be a good way to put it. Yep. I agree.
Speaker:I agree. It's I think it's fair to describe it that way. Yeah. I
Speaker:like the way you're approaching it. It's very systematic. It it
Speaker:feels, you know, it feels kind of appropriate
Speaker:in that there's, that there's a framework that
Speaker:you're following, a system that you're following, kind of a, like Frank
Speaker:said, a disciplined approach to it. And, it it feels
Speaker:self similar. So you're investing in technologies.
Speaker:Maybe you're looking for or maybe part of what you're looking for
Speaker:is someone who has the ability to
Speaker:perhaps create methodologies to solve business problems,
Speaker:technical problems. And, you know, and and in
Speaker:doing that, you're applying this methodology that you've already built,
Speaker:you and your partner. I think it's,
Speaker:the right way to put it. In a way,
Speaker:if you want to become better in what you're
Speaker:doing, you must have a system. Doesn't matter
Speaker:which discipline you're involved with. But if you want to constantly
Speaker:improve, you must have a system. Because without a system, you won't be
Speaker:able to look back in a retrospective and understand in a
Speaker:systematic manner what worked and what didn't work and
Speaker:how to improve it. So in order to have the the the the
Speaker:the base ground to analyze what worked and what didn't
Speaker:work, you need to have a a a framework, a systematic framework that
Speaker:will help you to do so. So you're describing an
Speaker:advanced, or mature. There's a capability maturity
Speaker:models that are applied in software all the time. And what you're describing sounds
Speaker:very, very similar to that. And it's,
Speaker:you know, the same sort of thing that I recall from an article that
Speaker:I I read. I wanna say it was back in the nineties. And it was
Speaker:about the team that developed software for the Space Shuttle,
Speaker:for NASA Space Shuttle here in the US. And
Speaker:one of the things that, that they would do, an approach that they
Speaker:took was if there was a
Speaker:failure in the code, they didn't
Speaker:go fix the failure. They went back to their process
Speaker:and found where that failed and let that failure in the code
Speaker:through. So it's it's funny that you
Speaker:describe it that way because of 2 things. 1st, I think the the
Speaker:people you referred to are very smarter than I am, and they
Speaker:build much greater things in a in a bigger unknown,
Speaker:environment. But, in in in
Speaker:regards to that, internally at team 8,
Speaker:the the system we've built to how to IDA,
Speaker:to how to validate, to how to build a company,
Speaker:we actually, we actually call it the machine and and for a
Speaker:reason. We try to build a machine, that will help
Speaker:us build great companies. That that really
Speaker:sounds impressive, and I'd love to know more about that. And I
Speaker:know we're, and I know we we have a limited amount
Speaker:of time, but I I'm fascinated by that application,
Speaker:you know, of this in a different field because
Speaker:I've seen, people try to attempt other methodologies
Speaker:that do great in software. My my number one experience was
Speaker:with the scrum agile method. Yep. And I was at a
Speaker:business where that was introduced, and we all learned it. I learned it there for
Speaker:the first time. But then I saw the the
Speaker:business, part of that try and adopt,
Speaker:and and, you know, adapt from and adapt it to,
Speaker:applying it to business principles and business decisions. And in that
Speaker:particular instance, it failed miserably. And it was
Speaker:like I don't know what they did differently because I'm I wasn't that
Speaker:high up in the business. I was a low level manager. But
Speaker:but seeing that having that experience, seeing that fail
Speaker:was eye opening. And it's really cool to see
Speaker:somebody applying this in a to a to a business model
Speaker:and especially to, venture capitalism and the
Speaker:funding of founders and the building of ideas,
Speaker:and taking an idea from actually taking it from before the
Speaker:idea even exists, just finding a founder
Speaker:and then building an idea and then building that idea
Speaker:to some product or service. That that's just very impressive
Speaker:to me. It's exciting to hear that that's happening. It sounds like the movie
Speaker:inception. Right? Like Doesn't it? Yeah. You get it? That you
Speaker:can move before it's really a fully formed idea. You kinda nudge
Speaker:it along. Yeah. So so you know what? Let let let
Speaker:me give you a manifestation of, this process that, relates to
Speaker:our discussion, today. One of the things that,
Speaker:we build, at teammate as
Speaker:assets that we use to, to execute upon that
Speaker:motion is what we refer to as the villages. We
Speaker:have a couple of them. We have the CISA village, the system
Speaker:information security officer village, and,
Speaker:the data village. The Cisco village obviously is
Speaker:a network of, great CISOs from
Speaker:across the globe. Many Fortune 500, companies CISOs
Speaker:are part of, that network. And in the data village, we have,
Speaker:CDOs and and head of, data operations in different
Speaker:companies all across the globe. And the reason why we
Speaker:build these, networks that, we work very hard to maintain
Speaker:and to create engagement in these networks, it's not only because of
Speaker:the of the social, for
Speaker:exactly
Speaker:for exactly what we've talked to. For example,
Speaker:recently, and we do it on a on a cadence. We reach out
Speaker:to our network to learn about their day to day
Speaker:and top of mind issues and challenges that they
Speaker:face in the real life. And, we use
Speaker:that, as an input for us to map
Speaker:the world and understand which areas are,
Speaker:mostly painful for, the the,
Speaker:network, members of ours. And it's a great
Speaker:indication for us to start investigating whether there is a potential to
Speaker:build a company there. Right? So this is one thing. And the
Speaker:second part of it, is later in the process. So,
Speaker:let's say we build a thesis. Let's say I came up with a thesis in
Speaker:a data infrastructure, vertical. Now
Speaker:I really like, my thesis, but, nobody cares about the fact
Speaker:that I like them. I need the network to like them. Right? Because they're their
Speaker:potential, buyer eventually. So I take
Speaker:the thesis that, we processed internally at, at,
Speaker:team 8 that we worked on it, and I bring it to their table.
Speaker:I want to hear a candid feedback from, these,
Speaker:village members, what they think about it, and, why,
Speaker:we don't know what we're talking about or the opposite. Why this is the the
Speaker:best thing since sliced bread?
Speaker:Right. Right. Yeah. It's it's almost like it takes a village,
Speaker:you know, or takes Exactly. You know? Exactly. The approach.
Speaker:Interesting.
Speaker:No. This is fascinating. Like, you know, it's it's it's fascinating to see kind of
Speaker:how this this world works as someone who is kind of, you know, on
Speaker:the outside and kind of I watched our tank. There's actually a
Speaker:knockoff version of the show called elevator pitch, which I've
Speaker:seen. You know, it's not my client's
Speaker:getting shark tank, but so what
Speaker:would be your advice to entrepreneurs?
Speaker:Like and and, like, what would be your advice for
Speaker:them in general? They have an idea. And what would
Speaker:be your advice to them to, like, say, hey. I wanna execute
Speaker:on this idea. Like, what how would they best approach a venture
Speaker:capitalist in today's kind of terms? Right? Because it used to be you have to
Speaker:write this huge document way back, then it became, oh, you see the PowerPoint
Speaker:deck. Right? I'm pretty sure it's evolved to something else now. What what what
Speaker:what would be your advice to somebody in that position? So,
Speaker:I'm trying to address this, question, holistically and not,
Speaker:tactically. First, I think
Speaker:that, having a founder that, operates
Speaker:in that specific domain for some time is very important.
Speaker:To have an intimate relationship with a problem, I think it's a get
Speaker:great indicator, for a great,
Speaker:problem understanding and potentially to solve that problem. So this
Speaker:is one thing. Secondly, critical
Speaker:thinking. Right? Sometimes all of us,
Speaker:fall in love with our ideas. Right?
Speaker:And and and this could be the the one of the the
Speaker:biggest detractors or or company destroyers
Speaker:out there, to fall in love with what you do. I mean, you should fall
Speaker:in love with it, but you should also be very judgmental
Speaker:about everything you do and question every step
Speaker:you take. For example, I give you the example. We come up with a
Speaker:thesis that sounds to us or feel to us very
Speaker:good, and we have, a lot of confidence with that. It's
Speaker:nice, but it doesn't mean a lot. I need the actual market,
Speaker:the actual, friction of the market,
Speaker:to indicate the same thing. So we try to be
Speaker:as critical thinkers as, possible.
Speaker:The people, we talked about it. Building your,
Speaker:founding team is crucial, for your
Speaker:success. And, it's one of the those things
Speaker:that I believe that you should build a team in a way that 1
Speaker:+1equal 3, meaning the sum of the people,
Speaker:or the the the value of the group is bigger than the sum of, the
Speaker:people. And to make sure you have a a good distribution of, skill
Speaker:set in that team, you have someone that is more business oriented, someone
Speaker:is more technical oriented, someone is more, focused on a
Speaker:product. These are great indicators or
Speaker:initial great indicators for, a good founding
Speaker:team, and and and and a good venture.
Speaker:I I love that approach. I love the overlapping bends,
Speaker:for both passion and for skill.
Speaker:The thing you said earlier, though, that that really, that I wanna
Speaker:go back to is the idea of an
Speaker:idea, if you will. So, yes, people can,
Speaker:I think, approach with a a great idea? And I see this all of the
Speaker:time on a much smaller scale, just managing teams of individuals
Speaker:that people will look at a a solution or look at a problem that needs
Speaker:to be solved and come up with a solution that
Speaker:is okay. Maybe not great, maybe it'll solve it, but
Speaker:it would be so much better if they just added a couple
Speaker:of, you know, a couple of tweaks to that idea. And it could
Speaker:be too. That that's one part
Speaker:of it. The other part of working with others, and this is the crucial part
Speaker:of that, building that team that you're talking about. And it's my experience
Speaker:with it is that, sometimes you need
Speaker:somebody to look you in the eye and say, that's a bad idea.
Speaker:And it really it can go a couple of ways from there. So one way
Speaker:it can go, and I think this is often overlooked, so I'm gonna mention it
Speaker:first, is that they may be wrong about that. It
Speaker:may be a great idea, and somebody's got a passion for it, and they
Speaker:want to, to build this thing. But here's an
Speaker:option. You don't you can build it, but maybe you don't have to
Speaker:build it right now. If you build this other idea, which
Speaker:is, you know, what everyone agrees that you should build, now
Speaker:everyone's engaged. You've got the power of all of those
Speaker:blends of skills and passions, and you can
Speaker:produce this product now. Go ahead and do that. Spend a few
Speaker:years on it. Make your money, and then you can go off and build your
Speaker:passionate project. And it could be that that also
Speaker:succeeds. So that just I that's just that take
Speaker:on it. I I really like that idea, though, the team. I
Speaker:think anybody who's ever worked in a good team has enjoyed
Speaker:that experience and seeks to repeat that experience because it
Speaker:is truly an awesome thing. It's a great feeling when the
Speaker:team clicks. I couldn't agree more
Speaker:with you, Andy. One thing that,
Speaker:was, I heard between the words of
Speaker:what you said is something that I also relate to, and
Speaker:this is the process. Right? We talked about the team.
Speaker:We talked about, the perspective of being a judgmental or
Speaker:critical thinker about everything you do. But one thing that I think
Speaker:is overlooked sometime is the process itself. I mean,
Speaker:I hear on a on an average week at least
Speaker:20, 30 new ideas. Right? Ideas
Speaker:are at best at best, 20% of the success of
Speaker:a new start up at best.
Speaker:80% if not more, it's all about the execution of
Speaker:the idea. Right. The execution of the idea. And,
Speaker:there there are many many layers to this statement.
Speaker:You start with the idea. Right? But, then reality
Speaker:happens. Right? And you see that, yeah. And
Speaker:then you see that the idea well, the the the origin
Speaker:of the idea is right, but, you need to constantly
Speaker:navigate the idea, the product vision,
Speaker:you know, with the conjunction of, the reality. And Sure.
Speaker:The best teams, others are the ones that
Speaker:can navigate, in a very up,
Speaker:open and critical thinking way the product
Speaker:from the the initial idea to the actual,
Speaker:embodiment or the actual manifestation of the product that it that
Speaker:they will, end up with. So the
Speaker:process itself is super important in my mind.
Speaker:Yeah. I I so agree with that. We have a there's a a famous
Speaker:military statement, but what you said reminded me of a modification of
Speaker:it. It's like no idea survives contact with
Speaker:reality. Mike Tyson is
Speaker:also known for for a similar quote where everybody has a plan until they
Speaker:get punched in the face. That's right. But I think I think that
Speaker:ties into something, you had said earlier, Adiad, was, you know, like, you you you
Speaker:wanna love your idea and you wanna fall in love with your idea, but I
Speaker:don't think you want your love to blind your common sense.
Speaker:So here is a a a quote I really like, to use.
Speaker:Don't fall in love with your solution. Fall in love with the problem.
Speaker:Right? Make sure you have yeah. Make sure you're
Speaker:you're very, very familiar with the problem.
Speaker:You really relate to it, you understand it in a very intimate
Speaker:manner, the right solution will evolve, will
Speaker:evolve throughout the process if if if you're a strong leader.
Speaker:Right. Wow. Yes. That's good. That's
Speaker:really good. That's a quotable. Definitely. I
Speaker:know we're short on time, and, normally, we do all these questions, but I think
Speaker:we can do an abbreviated one. I think the first question I'd have for you
Speaker:is how did you get how did you find your way into into
Speaker:being a VC? Right? Like, did did it find you or did you find
Speaker:it? So probably a little bit of both. So,
Speaker:as I mentioned, before I joined T9, I was, I spent
Speaker:15 years in a company I founded, a AI analytics
Speaker:company. And it was a great success. Right? When I left the company, it was
Speaker:at 100 and $60,000,000 of reoccurring revenue, and we had
Speaker:more than 800, employees, globally. But
Speaker:I did it for a very long period of time, 15 years. And I
Speaker:started that company out of college. It's almost, the the cliche
Speaker:of, founding up, a startup. You're
Speaker:doing brilliant. Yeah. And I wanted to to
Speaker:to, you know, to experience few other things.
Speaker:So when I started to have these existential thoughts, I informed the board
Speaker:of directors of, my company, and it took some time until I departed.
Speaker:But, during my last
Speaker:few years at Sisense, I also became an
Speaker:active angel investor. So I tried to start,
Speaker:giving back to the community of, entrepreneurship in Tel Aviv,
Speaker:by meeting founders and offering them my candid
Speaker:support and advice. That's it. And, I started to do
Speaker:that. And every once in a while, I met up, founders or a
Speaker:team that I got really excited, from. And,
Speaker:I I I asked them if I can also invest some of my
Speaker:own money. And this is how I started my, angel investment,
Speaker:journey. When I departed from teammate,
Speaker:You mean Sisense? Yep. Sorry. Sisense.
Speaker:I, had a lot of free time on my plate. So,
Speaker:naturally, I became more and more active
Speaker:in my angel investments. If you ask
Speaker:me when I when I left, Sisense, if I'll, if I
Speaker:want to become a VC, the answer would have probably been
Speaker:no way. I'm a founder. I'm a founder. I'm going
Speaker:to start a new company. And, I was very close
Speaker:to start up, a new company, after Sisense,
Speaker:but the reality is that it didn't happen. Now
Speaker:I can talk for hours about the psychological,
Speaker:reasons for that, but it didn't happen. And,
Speaker:I I can think of why not, but, eventually,
Speaker:after, I became, quite, active
Speaker:angel investor, I met the teammate, people.
Speaker:And, they talked to me for quite some time, and I remember the first
Speaker:few talk, that they asked me about the, about potentially
Speaker:working together. I told them I will never become a VC.
Speaker:But after some kind of, relationship for a long term,
Speaker:they came to me and told me, but, Aviad, you you were saying you're
Speaker:not you don't want to be a VC, but you actually invest in companies for
Speaker:your living. This is what you're doing currently. So join us. Don't
Speaker:fool yourself. Look at the mirror and join us, and it made
Speaker:sense. And, this is how I became a,
Speaker:a VC. You understand? That sounds
Speaker:like, Frank and I talk often about divine appointments, and
Speaker:it sounds very much like like one of those. You happen to run into
Speaker:the these people and it happened or, you know, your first
Speaker:reaction was not positive. That's great.
Speaker:Our next question is, what is your favorite part of your current
Speaker:gig? Very easy answer. Working
Speaker:with great founders. By far, meeting the
Speaker:teams, identify that these are great,
Speaker:great entrepreneurs. This is what makes me tick. And
Speaker:spending as much time, with them. I don't care doing what? Spending
Speaker:time with them? This is my favorite part of, my current gig. That
Speaker:is awesome. Very cool. We
Speaker:have 3 complete the sentences. When I'm not working, I enjoy blank.
Speaker:Well, it's a little bit embarrassing because, I don't have
Speaker:many hobbies. I really like, I really like, working.
Speaker:I I mean, obviously, my family. I love my family. So if I have spare
Speaker:time, I'm gonna I'm gonna spend it with, my wife and,
Speaker:kids. But if I'm not doing that, I'm probably working.
Speaker:No. I'm right there with you. Don't be embarrassed. You're I
Speaker:I don't know if you're in good company, but you have a lot of company.
Speaker:That's right. That's right. That's right. That's an interesting way to phrase
Speaker:it. So our second
Speaker:complete sentence, I think the coolest thing in technology today
Speaker:is blank. Oh, so many cool new things in
Speaker:technology. I think the most prominent one is the
Speaker:AI revolution we're all experiencing. It's
Speaker:disrupting so many verticals, and
Speaker:very, very quickly, probably more, or faster than
Speaker:anything I've seen in the past. I thought when the
Speaker:cloud movement started, I don't know, 10 years ago, I thought this
Speaker:is the the quickest, evolution or revolution
Speaker:in technologies that I've seen. Nothing compared to, the speed
Speaker:of AI, and and how quickly it changes so
Speaker:many
Speaker:in it's in I thought we had reached kind of, a
Speaker:certain plateau of pace. But then when
Speaker:Chat GPT came out, I mean, it did just, like, just
Speaker:accelerated. You know? What do you think made Cheggipt,
Speaker:becoming the pivotal thing in the perception of everyone that
Speaker:is, the reason for the the
Speaker:change in perception around AI? I
Speaker:personally think is the way that it was presented.
Speaker:It has you know, there's 2 factors to
Speaker:it. 1, it's a chatbot. Right? So people can kinda relate to that. Right? That's
Speaker:it the the the and big deal. Right? There's been chatbots around for number
Speaker:of years. But I think the real thing that blew people away
Speaker:was it destroyed the notion that AI can't be
Speaker:creative. Well, this is very close to what I think.
Speaker:Mhmm. I was dazzled. I mean, I heard
Speaker:about bots. I played with many bots in the past. But the first
Speaker:time I started to play with JetJPT, I was dazzled by the
Speaker:quality, how good it was. And it was light
Speaker:years, better than anything else, any other
Speaker:chatbot that I've seen, and and it was very apparent that this is a
Speaker:revolution for me at least. That was that was my reaction. Right? So
Speaker:when it came out, I was presenting because we we launched a product to Red
Speaker:Hat about the same time and at at AWS reinvent.
Speaker:Right? So I was kind of in AWS reinvent
Speaker:land. And I go I get to the airport at
Speaker:Vegas because early because when you wanna leave Vegas, you do you wanna
Speaker:leave. Right? So I get to the airport early, and I'm like, you
Speaker:know, I a lot of people I know have been, like, raving about chat GBP
Speaker:and saying how great it is. And I'm like, alright. Alright. So let me just
Speaker:ask it. How do I start how do I get started with SageMaker? I think
Speaker:that was the original question I asked it. And I had a expectation of,
Speaker:well, you do this, you do this, you do this. But, like, the the the
Speaker:answer behind it was so coherent and so cogent.
Speaker:Like you said, it was light years beyond my expectations.
Speaker:And I'm continually amazed at, like, what it can do. Right? Like, it
Speaker:and it blows my mind to this day and this is, like, what's
Speaker:going on 2 years later. Absolutely. Absolutely.
Speaker:Alright. Andy, you want the the next complete the sentence or has the allergies
Speaker:gotten you?
Speaker:Alright. I will I will ask you for him so we stay on some kinda
Speaker:sketchy. Sneezing. He's probably sneezing. Alright. Complete the sentence.
Speaker:I look forward to the day when I can use technology to blank.
Speaker:Take away the vast majority of my day to day
Speaker:bureaucracy. Right? Dealing with the bank and taxes.
Speaker:And I think we're getting quickly towards that.
Speaker:Quickly towards that. I'm involved in a company that,
Speaker:is actually building, disruptive technology in,
Speaker:filing your taxes every year. And they do it, yeah, doing
Speaker:it automatically in a in a very good manner.
Speaker:I met up, founding team in in legal deck that they
Speaker:build, a technology that can summarize
Speaker:thousands of, legal document very, very quickly and just
Speaker:do, the red lines very, very quickly and replace,
Speaker:you know, the the tedious work of, endless, hours of,
Speaker:lawyers in that regard. So I think we're at the right direction
Speaker:towards that, but, it's a brave new word, I
Speaker:think. I don't know what the tax code is outside the US, but
Speaker:in the US, it's very convoluted and confusing. Yep. So if you can have an
Speaker:AI that you can explain it to you like you're 5, you know what I
Speaker:mean, that would be very useful. There are a few very exciting
Speaker:technologies that, are after that goal, so stay tuned.
Speaker:I will eagerly be awaiting that.
Speaker:So share something different about yourself. It's a family podcast.
Speaker:Like, it's a it's a family podcast in the sense of,
Speaker:we went into this before. Like, when I drive to where
Speaker:my my my wife's family is, it's about 3 hours. It's about 1 Joe Rogan
Speaker:episode away, but I can't listen.
Speaker:That's influence. Right? You measure time and distance based on your
Speaker:podcast. Right? That is true.
Speaker:But, so I don't listen to
Speaker:it because I have kids in the car. So what that's
Speaker:the rationale behind it. So what's your, you know, what
Speaker:what's, you know would you answer that? Yeah.
Speaker:So first thing that comes to mind that, not many
Speaker:people know about me, I, really love traveling,
Speaker:and I used to to backpack in South
Speaker:America for almost a year. Oh, wow. A while
Speaker:ago. A while ago. But backpack by myself
Speaker:as a decision. I wanted to backpack by myself in
Speaker:South America, and I did it for 11 months. Wow.
Speaker:That is very interesting. You must have gotten a lot of, like, clarity on
Speaker:things. Like, just along with your thoughts. It feels amazing. I
Speaker:have to admit. That's awesome. So, Audible is a sponsor.
Speaker:And if you go to the data driven book dotcom,
Speaker:you can sign up for a month. And if you decide to
Speaker:subscribe after that, then Frank and I get to buy a coffee.
Speaker:It it works out well because we both like coffee. We treasure every
Speaker:cup. Is there a a good audio book
Speaker:or just a a book that has influenced you,
Speaker:impacted you? Yeah.
Speaker:Actually, there is one. It's called the mom's test. I don't know if you heard
Speaker:about it, but a few of the thing,
Speaker:that, we talked earlier relate to that book. And the mom
Speaker:test is a book about how, this is
Speaker:my interpretation of it, how to properly validate
Speaker:ideas. Right? In a very, as I mentioned, a very
Speaker:critical thinking way and doubtful way,
Speaker:that I usually advise, founders that I meet to read. I
Speaker:think it's very valuable. Interesting. Okay. I
Speaker:see it on Audible. I tested the link earlier, the
Speaker:data driven book.com, and it took me right over to Audible like it was
Speaker:supposed to, and it's by Rob Fitzpatrick. Is that accurate?
Speaker:Okay. The mom test. I love that title. Yep.
Speaker:Very cool. You know, in a in a nutshell in a nutshell,
Speaker:when, when you question people about idea, it talks
Speaker:about few things we we've mentioned is to focus on the problem and not the
Speaker:solution. Right? If I'll tell you, hey, guys. I have an idea for a great
Speaker:app on your iPhone that organize your icons. I don't know. What do you think
Speaker:about it? And you'll probably say, oh, it's cool. That
Speaker:feedback is meaningless. I learned nothing from that feedback.
Speaker:Right? Right. So how you structure the questionnaire? How you structure
Speaker:the discussion in order to properly validate the problems, the solution, and
Speaker:such is at the at the core of this book, and I think it's
Speaker:super valuable. Well, I love it when authors read their own work,
Speaker:and he does. And so I grabbed it. It's, about
Speaker:almost 4 hours long, and that's that makes it kind of a
Speaker:short audiobook, which is also, perfect. I love that as
Speaker:well. So I appreciate you, recommending that, and I'm going
Speaker:to read that, and then I'm gonna connect with you on LinkedIn so I can
Speaker:give you feedback on that, on what I would do at work. I would love
Speaker:that. Well, this has been an
Speaker:amazing show, Frank. Absolutely. I I it
Speaker:was it was a pleasure, Aviat. Yep. Where where
Speaker:people reach out to find out more about you? That's what I was gonna
Speaker:say. You're most welcome, and I'm very accessible. If
Speaker:you want to talk again, just, have my email. Send me an
Speaker:email. I travel a lot to the US. So next time on, on the
Speaker:East Coast, I get to New York a lot. So if you're there, I'll be
Speaker:happy to meet for I'll buy you coffee. You said you like coffee.
Speaker:That would be outstanding, sir. Thank you so much. So if,
Speaker:where can people learn about your, the company you're working with now?
Speaker:Sorry. Say it again. So where where might
Speaker:people learn more about the, the group you're working with now? Team
Speaker:8. Team 8. Yes. So, we can
Speaker:do multiple things. 1st, check our website,
Speaker:teammate, dot v c. You can read all about
Speaker:this team 8, the motion, the the portfolio companies, the
Speaker:founders, and such. And,
Speaker:if you need more information, I'll be more than happy to share with you, you
Speaker:know, marketing information and everything you need.
Speaker:So that is for our listeners team, the word team, and then the
Speaker:number 8 dot v c. Correct.
Speaker:Pretty awesome. Okay. Excellent. Andy and
Speaker:Frank, I had a blast. Thank you very much. Same we did
Speaker:too. Same Learned a lot of you. Yeah. Great great
Speaker:conversation. Thank you so much. Well, excellent. You. With that, we'll
Speaker:let the nice British AI lady finish the show. Well, that's a wrap on
Speaker:another episode of data driven. We hope you enjoyed our chat
Speaker:with Aviad Harrell from team 8 as much as we did. If you
Speaker:found this episode insightful, please show your support by
Speaker:liking, subscribing, and leaving a review on your favorite podcast
Speaker:platform. Your support helps us continue to bring you
Speaker:fascinating conversations and the latest in AI, data
Speaker:science and data engineering. Stay connected with us on
Speaker:social media and visit our website for more content.
Speaker:Until next time, keep learning, keep innovating, and as
Speaker:always, stay data