Superannuation is a cornerstone of retirement in Australia,
Speaker:and any tinkering with the system makes people sit up and
Speaker:take notice. Instead of taxing unrealized gains, the
Speaker:new proposal focuses on increasing the tax rate for super balancers
Speaker:above a certain threshold. So if the new proposal becomes law, Labor
Speaker:is still stealing your retirement savings. Above
Speaker:$3 million, it's 10%, and above $10 million, it's
Speaker:a whopping 40%. Insane. So
Speaker:if the government could tax unrealized gains today, what's
Speaker:to stop them from moving the goalposts again in
Speaker:the future? Right? Nothing. I'm Matthew Fraser and
Speaker:this is Crypto Collective. After making millions with Amazon
Speaker:and e-commerce, I realised that if I was starting again
Speaker:today, crypto would be my first choice. I'm here
Speaker:to help you take your first steps and build real wealth. Ready
Speaker:to set yourself up for life? Let's go. Guys, let's
Speaker:talk about the Australian Labor Party's about face on
Speaker:the proposed unrealized capital gains tax for superannuation funds.
Speaker:What I've always said was the theft of
Speaker:people's retirement savings. So what led to
Speaker:this massive backlash? Was it a political blunder? Or
Speaker:was there something more strategic going on? I'll also unpack
Speaker:in this episode the new proposal. what it means
Speaker:for your super, and whether Bitcoin in a self-managed super
Speaker:fund might just be the ticket to protecting your nest egg.
Speaker:Superannuation is a cornerstone of retirement in
Speaker:Australia, and any tinkering with the system makes people
Speaker:sit up and take notice. Earlier this year, the Labor
Speaker:government floated a bold plan to tax
Speaker:unrealized capital gains in superannuation. Now,
Speaker:for anyone not steeped in tax lingo, that means you'd have to be taxed
Speaker:not when you actually sell an asset, but when its
Speaker:value goes up on paper even if you haven't pocketed
Speaker:a single cent, even if you haven't sold the asset. The whole thing is ludicrous,
Speaker:right? So the government's rationale was to target
Speaker:so-called super rich, super balancers, arguing
Speaker:that a small cohort, only a small cohort, of Australians were
Speaker:enjoying outsized tax benefits. The line was,
Speaker:look, we need to ensure fairness and sustainability in
Speaker:the system. You may have heard Jim Chalmers talking about this line of,
Speaker:we need to make it fair. But as we'll see, the
Speaker:way they went about it sparked a lot more than just a
Speaker:policy debate. The backlash was almost instant. Everyday
Speaker:Aussies, including myself, fund managers, and
Speaker:even some within the Labor's own ranks, including
Speaker:Paul Keating and Bill Kelty, for example, they started
Speaker:ringing the alarm bells. The media was awash with headlines
Speaker:about raiding retirement savings and government overreach,
Speaker:which I guess I actually don't think the media went far enough.
Speaker:They spoke about it a little bit. There were town hall meetings, talkback
Speaker:radio meltdowns, and a flood of angry letters to
Speaker:MPs. So people feared the slippery slope.
Speaker:And I was talking about this relentlessly on my social
Speaker:media channels because this affects every single
Speaker:person who holds Bitcoin in their SMSF. So
Speaker:if the government could tax unrealized gains today, And
Speaker:I was also saying this relentlessly, what's to stop them
Speaker:from moving the goalposts again in the future, right?
Speaker:Nothing. So the pressure built up so much that
Speaker:eventually Labor scrapped the plan. The
Speaker:speed of the reversal was almost as shocking as
Speaker:the proposal itself. Was it a classic case, though, of
Speaker:listening to the people? Yeah, we just put our ear to the ground, no.
Speaker:Or was there something more to this story? So here's where
Speaker:it gets really interesting. Was this backflip a
Speaker:sign of government incompetence or a deliberate political
Speaker:strategy? Now, some pundits reckon Labor
Speaker:floated a test balloon proposing something
Speaker:extreme to gauge the public reaction, then walking
Speaker:it back to appear responsive and reasonable. Yeah,
Speaker:Chalmers and Albo, you know, being very reasonable, of course. But
Speaker:others argue it was simply a miscalculation, a
Speaker:policy cooked up in the Canberra bubble without fully
Speaker:grasping how fiercely Aussies guard their super.
Speaker:And we do. We're forced to put this money into our retirement
Speaker:savings fund, right? We've been told by governments for the last 20, 30 years
Speaker:that this is what you must do. And now the goalposts are changing. No,
Speaker:we weren't going to have it. So either way, the government got a loud wake
Speaker:up call about just how sensitive retirement savings are
Speaker:as political issues. And let's not forget, superannuation isn't
Speaker:just an economic lever, it's an emotional one.
Speaker:For many, it's the don't touch part of the Aussie dream.
Speaker:And I agree with that. We don't want politicians seeing
Speaker:the $4.2 trillion honeypot and just thinking they can just
Speaker:dip into it whenever they want. So what's
Speaker:on the table now? After the dust settled, labor
Speaker:came back with a revised approach. Instead of taxing unrealized
Speaker:gains, the new proposal focuses on increasing the tax rate
Speaker:for super balances above a certain threshold. So currently
Speaker:set at $3 million. Now, earnings on balances
Speaker:over that cap would attract a higher tax rate, but
Speaker:only on realized gains and income. So
Speaker:what's the key difference? No more taxing on phantom
Speaker:gains. The government's sticking to taxing real money
Speaker:that actually lands in your pocket. It's a less controversial move,
Speaker:but some say it still sets a tricky precedent for
Speaker:moving the goalposts on superannuation rules, and I would personally
Speaker:agree with that. So if the new proposal becomes law, Labor is
Speaker:still stealing your retirement savings. 15% up
Speaker:to $3 million. And guess what else? Above $3 million,
Speaker:it's 10%. And above $10 million, it's
Speaker:a whopping 40%. Insane.
Speaker:Hey guys, just quickly, this episode is brought to you by CoinStash, the
Speaker:Australian exchange I personally use to invest my
Speaker:SMSF into Bitcoin. and crypto. Now CoinStash is
Speaker:Australia's leading SMSF crypto exchange built for investors just
Speaker:like you. What really sets them apart is their service and
Speaker:expertise. If you're looking to invest in crypto through your SMSF, they
Speaker:make it simple. Just book a free call with their local team and
Speaker:they'll walk you through the entire process from setting up your crypto SMSF
Speaker:account to helping you stay compliant with Australian regulations, their
Speaker:experts guide you every step of the way. You'll get fast onboarding, dedicated
Speaker:support wherever you need it. You might be investing in digital assets,
Speaker:but with CoinStash, you're dealing with real people and that
Speaker:makes all the difference. So if you're ready to take control of your crypto
Speaker:super and make your SMSF crypto journey smooth sailing, hit
Speaker:the link in the show notes and book a free call with the CoinStash team
Speaker:today. Now, Back to the episode. So if
Speaker:the new proposal becomes law, Labor is still stealing
Speaker:your retirement savings. 15% tax
Speaker:up to $3 million, 30% tax up
Speaker:to $10 million, and a whopping 40% tax
Speaker:over $10 million. Now, you're going to say, oh, but how
Speaker:is it those people are going to get over $10 million? They should pay extra
Speaker:in tax. Well, the people who I know who have
Speaker:taken the chance, who have put their balls on the line and
Speaker:invested into Bitcoin within an SMSF,
Speaker:they are all expecting upwards of $3, $10, $20, $30 million
Speaker:balances, right? And just because they've done that, why should
Speaker:they now have to suffer under Labor's incompetence
Speaker:of managing money? They shouldn't. They should be able to keep every
Speaker:single cent, so to speak, of their Bitcoin. So what's
Speaker:the upshot for everyday Aussies? It is reportedly said
Speaker:that only 80-odd thousand people will be over $3 million
Speaker:in your super. But there's also now new reports to say
Speaker:that that initial reporting of the information that was given
Speaker:to us by the Labor Party is actually wrong. It could actually be upwards
Speaker:of now 500,000 people that'll be affected by
Speaker:these new tax rules above $3 million. But of course,
Speaker:critics warn that thresholds like this can be lowered
Speaker:in the future and drag more people into the net as
Speaker:account balances grow with inflation. There's
Speaker:also concern about the impact of fund performance. If funds
Speaker:have to sell assets to pay high taxes, especially
Speaker:in down markets, that could hurt returns for everyone. And maybe
Speaker:the biggest risk will be Aussies lose trust in the super
Speaker:system if the rules keep changing. And why wouldn't they lose trust?
Speaker:Because the government simply can't manage the budget so that after your
Speaker:retirement savings. Some commentators have gone as far as to
Speaker:label these moves as socialist. Which
Speaker:is exactly what I say. I also throw in communist, right?
Speaker:So let's just go with socialist, yeah? Or a form of
Speaker:government overreach. Well, I'm going to say it's both. It's definitely, the
Speaker:Labor Party in Australia is definitely a socialist, radical
Speaker:government. And it's also a form of government overreach, taking
Speaker:money that's not theirs. So the fear is that superannuation,
Speaker:once seen as untouchable, is now fair game for
Speaker:revenue-hungry governments. Is this just good fiscal
Speaker:management, or is it a threat to personal liberty? It's
Speaker:a fair question. The more government fiddles with super, the
Speaker:less people feel secure about their retirement. Australians are
Speaker:being asked to trust that today's changes won't turn into
Speaker:tomorrow's broken promises, and that trust is the bedrock of
Speaker:the whole system. So what should you do if you're concerned about
Speaker:these changes? First, stay informed. Read
Speaker:up on proposed policies and how they could affect you.
Speaker:Engage in advocacy. Write to your MP. Join a
Speaker:Superfund members forum or something and add
Speaker:your voice to the debate. and build your bag. I
Speaker:don't want to pay this ridiculous tax at all, but I'd
Speaker:rather be worried about paying tax on $100 million worth
Speaker:of Bitcoin than living in retirement on basics
Speaker:or even worse, the old age pension. In this instance, the
Speaker:only life raft for you is to allocate to Bitcoin in
Speaker:an SMSF. If you want to find out how to build generational wealth
Speaker:for your retirement, just click on the link in the show notes to the
Speaker:Crypto Collective. There you'll find hundreds and hundreds
Speaker:of other Aussies just like you who are already taking the steps or
Speaker:have taken the steps to set up an SMSF and
Speaker:allocate to Bitcoin. Why to Bitcoin? Because it's the number
Speaker:one performing asset and it's the life raft for your retirement future.
Speaker:Alright, take care. Hey, thanks for tuning into Crypto Collective. If you enjoyed
Speaker:this video, the best way to show your support is to subscribe to
Speaker:the channel, or if you're listening on Spotify, leave a five-star review.
Speaker:It really helps me to create more content just
Speaker:for you. Also, if you're ready to level up your
Speaker:crypto journey, make sure to check out CoinStash. It's
Speaker:the platform that I trust to buy, sell, and hold
Speaker:crypto with ease. You can also find more of me at
Speaker:I'm Matthew Fraser on all social media platforms. Take