1
00:00:00,000 --> 00:00:17,280
Hello listeners, welcome to Social Skills Coaching on June 25, 2025, where you become more likeable, more charismatic, and more productive.

2
00:00:17,280 --> 00:00:30,480
Today's featured book from Patrick King is Practical Intelligence, How to Think Critically, How to Construct Situations, Analyze Deeply, and Never Be Fooled.

3
00:00:30,480 --> 00:00:36,360
Our episode today comes from chapter 2, entitled Watch Yourself.

4
00:00:36,360 --> 00:00:50,160
In this chapter, we talk about the concept of metacognition, or thinking about our thoughts and how taking that step back and looking at a different level can assist us in our day-to-day lives.

5
00:00:50,160 --> 00:00:58,200
We'll explore how becoming aware of our thinking patterns is crucial for maintaining clear and logical thoughts.

6
00:00:58,200 --> 00:01:16,640
So get ready to discover the battle between system one and system two thinking, if you're familiar with Daniel Kahneman, and understand why overcoming the brain's natural inclination towards quick, instinctual thoughts is vital for accurate decision making.

7
00:01:16,640 --> 00:01:31,080
We'll also unravel the concept of cognitive biases, those mental shortcuts that can lead us astray, and we'll learn about common pitfalls like the availability heuristic or confirmation bias.

8
00:01:31,080 --> 00:01:38,760
Through this episode, you'll gain insights into powerful strategies to overcome these biases and improve your thinking habits.

9
00:01:38,760 --> 00:01:48,360
And also, we'll delve into the world of logical arguments, uncovering the truth behind statements and learning to identify flaws in reasoning.

10
00:01:48,360 --> 00:01:59,280
This is a lengthy episode, so get prepared for an enlightening journey as we equip ourselves with tools to enhance our cognitive abilities and navigate the complexities of thought.

11
00:01:59,280 --> 00:02:03,960
And don't forget, if you get lost or need a quick summary, check out the show notes.

12
00:02:03,960 --> 00:02:11,160
There'll be a time link there to get a summary of the highlights, a summary of takeaway points at the end of the episode.

13
00:02:11,160 --> 00:02:12,720
Thanks for joining us today.

14
00:02:12,720 --> 00:02:17,640
Let's get it on.

15
00:02:17,640 --> 00:02:27,360
In the first chapter of this book, we discussed how our psyches are pre-programmed to make the wrong judgments about what we see in a world that often isn’t what it seems to be.

16
00:02:27,360 --> 00:02:33,800
We also talked about how skepticism and critical thinking can help us vanquish those errors in discernment.

17
00:02:33,800 --> 00:02:43,240
In this chapter, we’ll face many of the same issues, but this time, we’ll start by talking about how biological factors can lead us to the same errors in judgment.

18
00:02:43,240 --> 00:02:52,760
We are biologically programmed to lack self-awareness in many ways, and when we don’t know what is driving us, we will often be driven right off the cliff.

19
00:02:52,760 --> 00:03:04,160
A doctor probably shouldn’t operate unless they know the true causes of an illness; we should understand the baseline that our brains operate from in order to properly move forward.

20
00:03:04,160 --> 00:03:08,200
The brain seems like a complex machine, and in many ways, it is.

21
00:03:08,200 --> 00:03:13,520
But you could view it as nothing more than an electrical network housed inside your skull.

22
00:03:13,520 --> 00:03:19,440
Information goes from neuron to neuron via electrical impulses that flicker across the synapses.

23
00:03:19,440 --> 00:03:22,480
Nothing more than trains and relay stations.

24
00:03:22,480 --> 00:03:31,200
Just like the electric currents flowing from power outlets, the brain impulses that control our thoughts prefer to follow the path of least resistance.

25
00:03:31,200 --> 00:03:36,960
The brain maintains these easy passageways of thought for maximum effectiveness and speed.

26
00:03:36,960 --> 00:03:48,800
This means that the more you think about a certain thing, the more the brain isolates and reinforces the path that thought travels along—therefore making it easier to think about that thing again in the future.

27
00:03:48,800 --> 00:03:51,200
That’s both good and bad news.

28
00:03:51,200 --> 00:03:57,160
It’s good in that refining those thought pathways makes certain mental tasks easier to accomplish.

29
00:03:57,160 --> 00:04:01,360
It’s helpful for creating good habits and reinforcing positivity.

30
00:04:01,360 --> 00:04:10,520
But it’s bad because if we latch on to negative or errant thoughts, they can become our default thought patterns, and this can be difficult to avoid.

31
00:04:10,520 --> 00:04:19,240
This is exactly where bad habits come from, and it’s why even though we logically know the spider won’t eat us, we can’t bear to face it.

32
00:04:19,240 --> 00:04:27,840
Our biological makeup overrules smart and clear thinking, and in effect robs us of our common sense and practical intelligence.

33
00:04:27,840 --> 00:04:34,880
Our brains become wired for flawed thinking, and this chapter uncovers how that happens and how to reverse it.

34
00:04:34,880 --> 00:04:41,040
You can take measures to counteract the faulty thoughts that take hold in the brain, and gain clarity of thought.

35
00:04:41,040 --> 00:04:46,960
It takes some dedicated and deliberate monitoring of our mental processes and understanding how they work.

36
00:04:46,960 --> 00:04:55,920
We call this practice metacognition—very simply, thinking about our thinking and watching yourself dispassionately and objectively.

37
00:04:55,920 --> 00:04:59,120
Two Systems of Thought

38
00:04:59,120 --> 00:05:00,760


39
00:05:00,760 --> 00:05:03,000
The brain is a wonder of biology.

40
00:05:03,000 --> 00:05:08,000
However, just like all our body parts, it gets exhausted when it’s overused.

41
00:05:08,000 --> 00:05:15,880
To prevent exhaustion, the brain regulates some of its processes so it can conserve the energy needed to power all its functions.

42
00:05:15,880 --> 00:05:23,200
This means it’s always seeking shortcuts, so we don’t have to think every last thing through, thereby conserving energy.

43
00:05:23,200 --> 00:05:32,360
In reality, the brain ends up cutting corners and ignoring important information in the interest of saving precious energy.

44
00:05:32,360 --> 00:05:38,240
In past eras, this was helpful because it allowed us to prioritize survival instincts above all else.

45
00:05:38,240 --> 00:05:41,160
But it’s much less useful to us now.

46
00:05:41,160 --> 00:05:51,120
The brain’s search for shortcuts has led to two systems of thought—one focused on speed and conservation of energy, and the other on accuracy and analysis.

47
00:05:51,120 --> 00:05:57,440
This is something we must be vigilant about, especially when we are introduced to new information or concepts.

48
00:05:57,440 --> 00:06:06,080
The brain would rather save energy for survival situations, but little does it realize that it can actually cause them through flawed thinking.

49
00:06:06,080 --> 00:06:13,200
This concept was popularized by professor Daniel Kahneman in his seminal book Thinking, Fast and Slow.

50
00:06:13,200 --> 00:06:26,280
Through a series of experiments, Kahneman developed a model that explains the separate processes the brain uses to absorb and react to various bits of information, imaginatively titled System 1 thinking and System 2 thinking.

51
00:06:26,280 --> 00:06:28,920
System 1 is “fast” thinking.

52
00:06:28,920 --> 00:06:32,040
This mode is automatic and instinctive.

53
00:06:32,040 --> 00:06:44,760
It’s what we use when we happen upon a situation that we’re familiar with and don’t need to process that much, like recognizing a friend, riding a bicycle, or doing single-digit math calculations.

54
00:06:44,760 --> 00:06:53,720
Since it’s intuitive, System 1 thinking is also associated with emotional reactions, like crying or laughing when seeing an old photograph.

55
00:06:53,720 --> 00:06:57,280
The main facet of System 1 thinking is effortlessness.

56
00:06:57,280 --> 00:07:08,200
It doesn’t require anything in the way of analysis or consideration, instead using a framework of associations that we’ve already experienced time and time again.

57
00:07:08,200 --> 00:07:17,520
System 1 is a series of mental shortcuts—called heuristics—that help us decode situations very quickly (more on those soon).

58
00:07:17,520 --> 00:07:25,280
And because there’s little time or effort used in System 1 thinking, it expends less energy and isn’t terribly exhausting.

59
00:07:25,280 --> 00:07:30,160
You’re not going to need a list of pros and cons to make decisions with System 1.

60
00:07:30,160 --> 00:07:36,720
Although System 1 is quicker, it’s aimed at doing the fast thing versus the right thing.

61
00:07:36,720 --> 00:07:39,440
System 2, on the other hand, is “slow” thinking.

62
00:07:39,440 --> 00:07:47,640
This style is much more contemplative and analytical, and it’s generally used when we’re absorbing a new experience or learning.

63
00:07:47,640 --> 00:07:52,880
It’s employed for any situation that requires more mental labor and effort.

64
00:07:52,880 --> 00:08:02,680
System 2 controls decision-making in events that could result in high consequences, like choosing a college, buying a new car, or quitting your job.

65
00:08:02,680 --> 00:08:19,280
You also use System 2 when you’re doing something that needs more focus or effort, like driving through a foggy night, striving to hear someone speak in a noisy room, trying to recall a conversation you had a few weeks ago, or learning a complex school subject that’s new to you.

66
00:08:19,280 --> 00:08:26,560
Skepticism and critical thinking, like the kind we discussed earlier in this book, fall under System 2.

67
00:08:26,560 --> 00:08:34,640
Whereas System 1 thinking is fluid and instinctive, System 2 thinking is the opposite: it’s deliberate, conscious, and methodical.

68
00:08:34,640 --> 00:08:42,240
System 1 thinking is the proverbial skydiver, where System 2 thinking is the proverbial cautious lawyer.

69
00:08:42,240 --> 00:08:53,280
System 2 needs time and labor to process new information—and as a result, it uses more brain energy and can be tiring or draining.

70
00:08:53,280 --> 00:09:03,240
That flustered and fatigued feeling you might get while studying or reading a book isn’t because you can’t understand it or are bored; it’s an actual biological imperative.

71
00:09:03,240 --> 00:09:05,200
You’re using up your System 2 energy.

72
00:09:05,200 --> 00:09:11,600
Both systems of thinking are important to us, as we use them for different situations.

73
00:09:11,600 --> 00:09:17,800
Most times, you don’t need to stop and think about whether to go at a green light or hug a close friend you haven’t seen in a while.

74
00:09:17,800 --> 00:09:26,080
They’re just things you automatically do, and there aren’t a lot of considerations or analyses you have to make before you do them.

75
00:09:26,080 --> 00:09:30,280
You draw from your past experiences and make an instant decision.

76
00:09:30,280 --> 00:09:41,800
On the other hand, if you’re reading a calculus textbook, planning a family budget, or deciding whether to ask someone to marry you, you can’t just think casually or rely on your instincts to pull you through.

77
00:09:41,800 --> 00:09:47,320
There’s a time and place for both System 1 and 2 thinking.

78
00:09:47,320 --> 00:09:51,400
Remember when we said the brain prefers the path of least resistance?

79
00:09:51,400 --> 00:10:04,160
This means it favors System 1 thinking whenever possible, and you must force yourself to take a step back and switch into System 2 thinking, which is what we’re after most of the time in clear thinking.

80
00:10:04,160 --> 00:10:11,680
System 1 thinking is ultimately quite limiting, which is unfortunate because it’s where our minds go first and foremost.

81
00:10:11,680 --> 00:10:22,160
It makes us susceptible to accepting things and situations at first glance, not thinking skeptically, being more gullible, and overall faulty thinking.

82
00:10:22,160 --> 00:10:27,760
It makes us impulsive and rash without considering consequences or implications.

83
00:10:27,760 --> 00:10:29,720
It makes us think dumber.

84
00:10:29,720 --> 00:10:38,800
For things you encounter on a regular basis or have deep familiarity with, it’s great—this is where System 1 thinking shines.

85
00:10:38,800 --> 00:10:45,760
If you have a plethora of experience with a situation, this system can indeed help you make a good decision.

86
00:10:45,760 --> 00:10:55,760
It’s also obviously useful when dangerous elements are present, as System 1 thinking springs you into action where analysis and careful consideration would leave you dead.

87
00:10:55,760 --> 00:11:04,800
But in situations you’re a stranger to (most situations), the instincts of System 1 are almost worthless.

88
00:11:04,800 --> 00:11:10,040
System 1 uses familiarity and pre-existing associations to work.

89
00:11:10,040 --> 00:11:19,680
Your instincts are based on what you’ve already known, seen, or experienced; they won’t do you any good in a completely unfamiliar situation.

90
00:11:19,680 --> 00:11:30,640
You can’t go straight from driving a car to operating a sailboat—even though you know how to change direction with a steering wheel, those instincts won’t help you when you’re trying to change direction with sails.

91
00:11:30,640 --> 00:11:35,720
System 1 also presents certain road bumps in learning.

92
00:11:35,720 --> 00:11:42,240
Remember, your brain’s preferred default mode is easy (some would say lazy).

93
00:11:42,240 --> 00:11:51,120
When presented with new material to learn, there’s always a chance your brain will take a look at the information and attempt to reduce and simplify all the nuance out of it.

94
00:11:51,120 --> 00:11:57,120
Perhaps Kahneman’s overall lesson is that we must fight our natural instinct to be lazy thinkers.

95
00:11:57,120 --> 00:12:00,880
But System 2 ain’t always what it’s cracked up to be either.

96
00:12:00,880 --> 00:12:05,240
We can’t do it all the time because it would be impractical and too time-consuming.

97
00:12:05,240 --> 00:12:13,000
But more importantly, it’s plain exhausting, especially if you have to keep forcing yourself to do it.

98
00:12:13,000 --> 00:12:25,600
Maintaining your self-control, which is what metacognition is, is an exhausting effort—if you use up all your resources to force yourself to do something, chances are, you’ll be less able to do it next time.

99
00:12:25,600 --> 00:12:31,040
This leads to a side effect called ego depletion.

100
00:12:31,040 --> 00:12:42,000
Expending the mental energy required in System 2 thinking can leave one so drained that it turns their brain into mush and prevents them from exercising it in the near future.

101
00:12:42,000 --> 00:12:57,200
If you’re pushing yourself to read a chapter of James Joyce’s Ulysses—not the easiest work of fiction to consume, a System 2 book if there ever was one—you might not feel up to it next time unless you’ve formed a System 1-type connection with the material.

102
00:12:57,200 --> 00:13:00,040
It’ll just be too much.

103
00:13:00,040 --> 00:13:05,800
Hand over that cheap romance novel with Fabio’s chiseled jawline on the cover.

104
00:13:05,800 --> 00:13:17,600
Ego depletion simply leads to mental fatigue, which doesn’t just cause System 1 thinking; it leads to incredibly poor decision-making out of stress, discomfort, and anxiety.

105
00:13:17,600 --> 00:13:27,440
After a bruising day at work, it’d be understandable if you decided not to make dinner from scratch—which would probably taste better and be healthier—and just warm up something in the microwave.

106
00:13:27,440 --> 00:13:45,600
(On a side note, additional studies on ego depletion have turned up inconclusive results, but we can still make a credible argument that consciously having to think about ten tasks in a day is more mentally strenuous than thinking about two tasks in a day.)

107
00:13:45,600 --> 00:13:46,600
What can we do about this?

108
00:13:46,600 --> 00:13:56,320
First and foremost, attempt to be aware that there are two levels of thinking, and realize that you are probably using System 1 more often than not.

109
00:13:56,320 --> 00:14:01,680
Consciously ask yourself if you are making the right choice or merely the quick one.

110
00:14:01,680 --> 00:14:05,120
Ask what is driving you—truth or speed.

111
00:14:05,120 --> 00:14:11,440
In other words, use metacognition and watch yourself dispassionately and objectively.

112
00:14:11,440 --> 00:14:19,200
Draw a contrast between the two types of thinking and become familiar with what each feels like to you.

113
00:14:19,200 --> 00:14:24,160
Awareness is the first step to any type of change, because it lets you know where you need to go.

114
00:14:24,160 --> 00:14:35,520
Second, and this is much more difficult, is to transform your System 2 diligence and struggles into System 1 instincts through intentional repetition.

115
00:14:35,520 --> 00:14:38,760
Think of chess masters.

116
00:14:38,760 --> 00:14:45,840
For extended periods of time, they have to employ System 2 thinking to understand all the complexities of the game.

117
00:14:45,840 --> 00:14:53,320
But after years of experience, they’ve catalogued thousands of scenarios, effective strategies, and defenses.

118
00:14:53,320 --> 00:15:06,240
With all that information now at immediate disposal, they can make most of their opening moves without thinking, as all combinations are mere patterns they have seen before, and they only have to switch to System 2 if they run into trouble in the game.

119
00:15:06,240 --> 00:15:14,920
Simply put, exposure and consistency shifts us from System 2 to System 1 thinking over time.

120
00:15:14,920 --> 00:15:17,720
It eventually becomes the path of least resistance for you.

121
00:15:17,720 --> 00:15:26,000
When you can turn something that requires concentrated effort into something you do habitually, it can be dramatically transformative.

122
00:15:26,000 --> 00:15:34,880
The hardest part of any new thing—starting a diet, a new job, learning to drive—always comes at the beginning, when you’re using System 2.

123
00:15:34,880 --> 00:15:45,600
But after a while, and it’s usually not that long, you start to feel more natural in what you’re doing, and it becomes a positive habit that you don’t have to think too much about (System 1).

124
00:15:45,600 --> 00:15:54,600
If you want chess to be less mentally taxing, it takes time to move all the strategy and combinations from System 2 to System 1.

125
00:15:54,600 --> 00:15:59,000
It’s exactly the same way with critical thinking.

126
00:15:59,000 --> 00:16:01,840
You are mired in bad thinking habits in System 1.

127
00:16:01,840 --> 00:16:09,600
Therefore, begin to intentionally slow yourself down and walk through the steps of analytical and skeptical thinking.

128
00:16:09,600 --> 00:16:18,960
It will take time, but it will eventually become a habit, and a habit is really just another way of saying that something has moved from System 2 to System 1 thinking.

129
00:16:18,960 --> 00:16:23,440
And eventually it’ll be something you just automatically do.

130
00:16:23,440 --> 00:16:26,560
Battling Biases

131
00:16:26,560 --> 00:16:26,560


132
00:16:26,560 --> 00:16:31,880
Another way in which we must watch our thinking is in relation to cognitive biases.

133
00:16:31,880 --> 00:16:48,320
In short, they are additional ways in which the brain instinctively seeks shortcuts and the path of least resistance, which then result in faulty thinking that distorts or misinterprets the truth and could subsequently lead to bad decisions.

134
00:16:48,320 --> 00:16:56,840
A cognitive bias is a pattern of thought that favors one’s own experience, beliefs, and subjectivity over reason and objectivity.

135
00:16:56,840 --> 00:17:02,400
We all have our own perceptions and opinions about the world and how it works.

136
00:17:02,400 --> 00:17:09,480
These beliefs come from our own experience, and we use them to make predictions and judgments about what happens.

137
00:17:09,480 --> 00:17:16,960
The problem with cognitive biases is that they only reflect a single, solitary person’s experience: yours.

138
00:17:16,960 --> 00:17:18,120
(Or mine.)

139
00:17:18,120 --> 00:17:22,520
Your memory of a certain event is colored by your own beliefs about it.

140
00:17:22,520 --> 00:17:26,400
And let’s face it—that viewpoint is probably biased.

141
00:17:26,400 --> 00:17:39,200
Every time a relationship breaks up, each person has their own perception of what went wrong and tends to retell the story of the breakup in ways that make themselves look better and alleviate their fault in the matter.

142
00:17:39,200 --> 00:17:46,520
Now imagine this tendency as applied to each and every situation that has open-ended interpretations.

143
00:17:46,520 --> 00:17:59,400
Other times, cognitive biases are a byproduct of downright incorrect thinking and interpretations of the world that, once again, are caused by the brain’s proclivity for certainty and System 1 thinking.

144
00:17:59,400 --> 00:18:06,560
If we aren’t aware that we are operating from a sorely limited worldview and perspective, then we are doomed.

145
00:18:06,560 --> 00:18:15,440
Biases can also come from the two ways in which we organize the limited information we have about the world: schemas and heuristics.

146
00:18:15,440 --> 00:18:21,800
They serve to put what we know about the world into action and facilitate quick decision-making.

147
00:18:21,800 --> 00:18:26,560
Each of them goes a long way in producing our psychological triggers.

148
00:18:26,560 --> 00:18:29,040
Schemas.

149
00:18:29,040 --> 00:18:35,240
A schema is a model by which we arrange and decipher the information we’re currently receiving.

150
00:18:35,240 --> 00:18:50,480
It allows us to say, “Okay, based on these three factors I can observe, I know what this is and how to act.” Imagine a schema as a snapshot of a certain situation, and we use that snapshot to arrange unfamiliar information.

151
00:18:50,480 --> 00:18:59,160
Introduced by psychologist Jean Piaget, schemas are contextual, and we have schemas for different types of situations.

152
00:18:59,160 --> 00:19:06,200
Schemas develop throughout our entire lives, though they’re most prevalent when we’re learning about something for the first time.

153
00:19:06,200 --> 00:19:12,680
But while schemas are extremely useful, they can steer us toward unwarranted biases or errors.

154
00:19:12,680 --> 00:19:15,480
Heuristics.

155
00:19:15,480 --> 00:19:25,640
Where schemas help (and hurt) us in learning and interpreting certain things, heuristics are more about how quickly we solve problems and make decisions.

156
00:19:25,640 --> 00:19:34,680
A heuristic is a shortcut our minds take when choosing a certain course of action, and as with a schema, it can be helpful or harmful.

157
00:19:34,680 --> 00:19:36,160
How do they differ?

158
00:19:36,160 --> 00:19:45,040
Where schemas are about understanding a situation at large, heuristics are about your role in a situation and how to act within it.

159
00:19:45,040 --> 00:19:50,600
“If this is the situation,” a heuristic says, “then I should act in this way.”

160
00:19:50,600 --> 00:19:50,600


161
00:19:50,600 --> 00:19:54,360
We make hundreds of decisions every day.

162
00:19:54,360 --> 00:20:09,120
Most of them are small, ultimately trivial ones: what we’ll have for lunch, what radio station we’ll listen to on the way home, what grocery store we’re going to shop at, and so forth, unlike major life decisions that could have long-term consequences.

163
00:20:09,120 --> 00:20:15,800
We simply can’t evaluate every last detail or possible ramification of small decisions.

164
00:20:15,800 --> 00:20:19,680
It would be a waste of valuable time and mental energy.

165
00:20:19,680 --> 00:20:22,000
That’s where heuristics come in.

166
00:20:22,000 --> 00:20:27,840
They’re mental guidelines based on past experiences that we use to make basic daily decisions.

167
00:20:27,840 --> 00:20:39,120
Think of heuristics as flashcards: they give us quick, abbreviated information to help us make speedy choices about daily decisions that we can’t stop and deliberate over.

168
00:20:39,120 --> 00:20:51,960
Like the prior section discusses, our brains are crazy about System 1 thinking and using schemas and heuristics: they take less effort, energy, and time, and make everything simple.

169
00:20:51,960 --> 00:20:58,360
Cognitive biases enforce that preference because they encourage snap judgments and quick decisions.

170
00:20:58,360 --> 00:21:05,960
As convenient as they are, they blind us to the complex realties that dwell underneath almost everything under the sun.

171
00:21:05,960 --> 00:21:10,560
Cognitive biases do have their uses, however.

172
00:21:10,560 --> 00:21:20,040
Sometimes you have to clear the decks of your brain’s queue, and to do that, certain positive applications of cognitive bias can be good things.

173
00:21:20,040 --> 00:21:25,960
But even in those situations, you need to be aware enough to keep your bias from becoming too strong.

174
00:21:25,960 --> 00:21:33,800
Having acknowledged this, there are four particular life scenarios where cognitive bias can actually be beneficial:

175
00:21:33,800 --> 00:21:33,800


176
00:21:33,800 --> 00:21:36,040
First.

177
00:21:36,040 --> 00:21:39,160
When there’s too much information to absorb.

178
00:21:39,160 --> 00:21:48,800
We live in a time when there’s a deluge of facts, data, statistics, stories, accounts—basically too much information.

179
00:21:48,800 --> 00:21:55,680
The overload can be exhausting, and usually contains at least some bits of info that are of no use to us whatsoever.

180
00:21:55,680 --> 00:21:58,720
We can become overwhelmed and paralyzed.

181
00:21:58,720 --> 00:22:05,280
So it becomes necessary to filter out the information that’s relevant and retain only the parts we can use.

182
00:22:05,280 --> 00:22:10,640
Cognitive bias can help reinforce that filter, and it does so in several ways.

183
00:22:10,640 --> 00:22:21,200
The brain tends to latch on to the most repeated or recently activated memories (something called the availability heuristic, which we’ll explain more in a bit).

184
00:22:21,200 --> 00:22:29,520
It also tends to remember events or people that are strange or humorous, and notices more strongly when something has changed.

185
00:22:29,520 --> 00:22:43,760
So especially when you’re in a situation where you experience a lot of repetition—like a day-to-day “grind” job—your brain tends to relate more to what it already knows, as well as when something is odd or different about it.

186
00:22:43,760 --> 00:22:55,920
Of course, when we’re experiencing a flood of information, we could fall prey to confirmation bias and deliberately exclude anything that doesn’t support our most highly cherished beliefs.

187
00:22:55,920 --> 00:23:00,360
And that could mean we’re missing out on something extremely important.

188
00:23:00,360 --> 00:23:02,560
Second.

189
00:23:02,560 --> 00:23:06,560
When we’re struggling to find “meaning” in certain things.

190
00:23:06,560 --> 00:23:13,680
We need context for the confusing and varied events that happen in our lives and the things we observe in the world.

191
00:23:13,680 --> 00:23:19,680
If we can’t derive any meaning or significance from them, we feel adrift and lost.

192
00:23:19,680 --> 00:23:23,560
This puts us in an immediate state of vulnerability.

193
00:23:23,560 --> 00:23:30,480
To avoid that, we take whatever information we’ve already filtered and try to find patterns and connections.

194
00:23:30,480 --> 00:23:35,200
Cognitive bias has already reduced the amount of information we have.

195
00:23:35,200 --> 00:23:40,360
Now the brain tries to find a certain story in that limited data.

196
00:23:40,360 --> 00:23:50,080
In doing so, it relies on our personal experience, looking for past events to compare with this new happening so that it makes some kind of sense to us.

197
00:23:50,080 --> 00:23:59,680
The risk in this, however, is that the brain may rely on outdated stereotypes we have set up or sweeping generalities and judgments we already believe.

198
00:23:59,680 --> 00:24:10,200
Also, the brain tends to favor people or things we’re comfortable or familiar with—it considers them “better” than people or things we don’t like or don’t know much about.

199
00:24:10,200 --> 00:24:13,760
The brain considers that information too.

200
00:24:13,760 --> 00:24:19,360
In this situation, the cognitive bias won’t give a full picture, of course.

201
00:24:19,360 --> 00:24:22,840
It’s all based on our very limited past experience.

202
00:24:22,840 --> 00:24:28,640
But for a moment or two, it’s enough for our brains to develop some meaning from the situation.

203
00:24:28,640 --> 00:24:31,080
Third.

204
00:24:31,080 --> 00:24:33,240
When we need to act quickly.

205
00:24:33,240 --> 00:24:36,600
Time puts us into a crunch.

206
00:24:36,600 --> 00:24:39,560
Decisions need to be made in fast order.

207
00:24:39,560 --> 00:24:47,440
If we let ourselves get bogged down by inactivity or don’t react swiftly enough, we can fall behind or risk our survival.

208
00:24:47,440 --> 00:24:53,320
Cognitive biases can be helpful in that regard—although, again, not without potential hazards.

209
00:24:53,320 --> 00:24:56,400
Our egos have a role in this action.

210
00:24:56,400 --> 00:25:01,120
We have to feel that we’re capable of making a positive and important impact.

211
00:25:01,120 --> 00:25:08,800
So the cognitive bias may fill us with a sense of confidence (or, more likely, overconfidence) to get the motor running.

212
00:25:08,800 --> 00:25:12,160
In doing this, we may jump to conclusions.

213
00:25:12,160 --> 00:25:15,320
But we’ll get stuff done and things will be in motion.

214
00:25:15,320 --> 00:25:19,080
Sometimes this is indeed the most important factor.

215
00:25:19,080 --> 00:25:26,600
Cognitive biases cause us to fall back on the things that are most familiar and comfortable to us.

216
00:25:26,600 --> 00:25:30,360
We rely on the most immediate and available resources.

217
00:25:30,360 --> 00:25:36,720
We focus on the present situation, preferring to ponder that instead of the past or the future.

218
00:25:36,720 --> 00:25:44,880
We concentrate on things we can more easily relate to and eschew tools or assets that don’t make as much sense to us.

219
00:25:44,880 --> 00:25:54,960
We strongly prefer solutions that look simple, thorough, and relatively risk-free, rather than answers that are overly complicated, vague, or unsafe.

220
00:25:54,960 --> 00:26:00,920
When the clock’s running low, this may be a perfectly reasonable course of action.

221
00:26:00,920 --> 00:26:04,480
And it’s almost entirely fueled by cognitive bias.

222
00:26:04,480 --> 00:26:11,320
But since it comes fast and furious, there might be some cleanup required once everything’s settled down.

223
00:26:11,320 --> 00:26:13,800
Fourth.

224
00:26:13,800 --> 00:26:17,280
When we’re deciding what we need to remember for the future.

225
00:26:17,280 --> 00:26:23,560
The final scenario in which cognitive bias might be of assistance concerns memory.

226
00:26:23,560 --> 00:26:33,480
If only fragments of our constant information overload are useful to us now, then even less of it will be relevant to us in the days and years to come.

227
00:26:33,480 --> 00:26:38,120
So again, we have to cherry-pick the things and details that we remember.

228
00:26:38,120 --> 00:26:42,520
Our cognitive bias steps in to shape these memories.

229
00:26:42,520 --> 00:26:46,160
This process basically involves reduction.

230
00:26:46,160 --> 00:26:52,280
We’ll discard some of the finer specifics of things and events and form broader, more general memories.

231
00:26:52,280 --> 00:26:58,960
We trim some of the multiple smaller events off and reshape them into a few basic key points.

232
00:26:58,960 --> 00:27:04,760
Maybe we’ll pick out only a couple events and elevate them so they represent the whole experience.

233
00:27:04,760 --> 00:27:13,640
In processing these new memories, our cognitive bias again defers to those that are most meaningful or familiar to the brain.

234
00:27:13,640 --> 00:27:28,360
It will also “edit” certain memories so they become more accessible to us, but in this process, certain details might accidentally be removed or inserted—so we remember the event slightly differently than how it really happened.

235
00:27:28,360 --> 00:27:41,760
And our memory of the experience is more affected by outside circumstances (our condition while the memory was happening, how the information’s being presented, and so forth) than by how crucial the information might be.

236
00:27:41,760 --> 00:27:50,760
There are times when cognitive bias can help you, but biases are decidedly not the path to practical intelligence.

237
00:27:50,760 --> 00:27:54,400
In fact, they veritably put a blindfold on you.

238
00:27:54,400 --> 00:28:02,080
Thus, we must delve into a few of the most prominent biases to understand how to battle them when we can.

239
00:28:02,080 --> 00:28:06,960
Four Cognitive Biases to Watch Out For

240
00:28:06,960 --> 00:28:06,960


241
00:28:06,960 --> 00:28:11,320
Nobody gets by without cognitive biases.

242
00:28:11,320 --> 00:28:15,240
They are, by definition, patterns of thought that are undetectable.

243
00:28:15,240 --> 00:28:26,480
Cognitive biases lead one to jump to conclusions and make instant rash assessments—and you just can’t build a meaningful relationship with practical intelligence if they’re all you depend upon.

244
00:28:26,480 --> 00:28:32,080
There’s reality, and then there’s the version of it that your biases create.

245
00:28:32,080 --> 00:28:39,480
In order to use practical intelligence, you must have a firm grasp on reality in its objective form.

246
00:28:39,480 --> 00:28:48,120
There are a few specific cognitive biases we’ll take a brief look at in hopes that you’ll be aware of them and can keep them under control.

247
00:28:48,120 --> 00:28:53,120
I’m not going to suggest you avoid them, because sometimes they’re unavoidable.

248
00:28:53,120 --> 00:29:03,720
But I will say they’re ones to watch out for—to try to realize when they’re happening so you can pause and make at least a brief attempt to think more deeply when they come up.

249
00:29:03,720 --> 00:29:05,880
More metacognition.

250
00:29:05,880 --> 00:29:11,160
The availability heuristic.

251
00:29:11,160 --> 00:29:16,480
The brain tends to prefer information that’s most readily available or comes to awareness rapidly.

252
00:29:16,480 --> 00:29:25,520
If something simply comes to mind swiftly or is easily rememberable, we tend to attach an importance to it that it might not really deserve.

253
00:29:25,520 --> 00:29:35,120
This heuristic excludes supporting information that might be important to consider, along with countering details that might be used to argue against it.

254
00:29:35,120 --> 00:29:40,360
For example, you might see the topic “tsunamis” trending on Twitter.

255
00:29:40,360 --> 00:29:47,520
You follow a couple links to recent “news” reports that say tsunamis are expected to happen more often in the near future.

256
00:29:47,520 --> 00:29:49,320
The reports are compelling.

257
00:29:49,320 --> 00:29:51,200
You feel a little nervous.

258
00:29:51,200 --> 00:29:54,200
You become worried that you’ll be a tsunami victim.

259
00:29:54,200 --> 00:29:56,680
You start thinking that you haven’t prepared enough.

260
00:29:56,680 --> 00:30:04,520
You get to the point where you think it’s inevitable that someday you’ll get swallowed up by a tsunami and there’s nothing you can do about it.

261
00:30:04,520 --> 00:30:14,720
In all this concern, you temporarily forget that you live in Kansas, a landlocked state in the middle of the United States where tsunamis never happen.

262
00:30:14,720 --> 00:30:20,800
Tsunamis require a large body of water and are best known for happening to small island nations.

263
00:30:20,800 --> 00:30:34,160
That’s the availability heuristic in a nutshell: you got spooked by a bunch of instantly accessible information that made you forget the chances of you getting swept away by a tsunami in Kansas are virtually impossible.

264
00:30:34,160 --> 00:30:43,880
When you are asked about your fears, you answer “tsunamis” and ignore the rash of home burglaries that might be occurring, or that you are in danger of losing your job.

265
00:30:43,880 --> 00:30:53,800
Just because something is available or notable does not mean it is important or representative.

266
00:30:53,800 --> 00:30:54,680
Gambler’s fallacy.

267
00:30:54,680 --> 00:31:01,560
This common cognitive bias magnifies the importance of past events in the prediction of future outcomes.

268
00:31:01,560 --> 00:31:14,520
The bias dictates that conditions and previous results point to the inevitability of something happening down the road—when in reality, each subsequent event is independent of the previous.

269
00:31:14,520 --> 00:31:19,200
This bias wants to create a cause-and-effect relationship where none exists.

270
00:31:19,200 --> 00:31:28,640
For instance, just because a coin has flipped to the heads side one hundred times in a row doesn’t mean it’s more likely for the next flip to land on the tails side.

271
00:31:28,640 --> 00:31:31,520
There is no relationship between each flip.

272
00:31:31,520 --> 00:31:40,400
This particular cognitive bias is called “gambler’s fallacy” because it’s responsible for a lot of out-of-control gambling addictions.

273
00:31:40,400 --> 00:31:56,400
Somebody betting on a football game may say a certain side will win because they’ve always done so before, or because they’ve lost so many times that they are due for a win: “The Packers are due a win this week after all the tough losses, and they are going to get it against the Lions!”

274
00:31:56,400 --> 00:31:56,400


275
00:31:56,400 --> 00:32:04,160
Forget that this guy would be a terrible gambler if that’s the information he used to lay a bet, but it illustrates the point.

276
00:32:04,160 --> 00:32:11,800
The past history of the Packers-Lions rivalry doesn’t have anything to do with how well those teams have played in recent years.

277
00:32:11,800 --> 00:32:16,880
The Packers’ losses in recent weeks don’t mean their turn for a win is coming.

278
00:32:16,880 --> 00:32:21,640
Just because something happened doesn’t mean something else will happen.

279
00:32:21,640 --> 00:32:27,240
But someone employing gambler’s fallacy would not pay those factors any mind.

280
00:32:27,240 --> 00:32:31,280
Post-purchase rationalization.

281
00:32:31,280 --> 00:32:38,760
This cognitive bias seeks to reduce regret, and it’s based on a fairly common consumer behavior.

282
00:32:38,760 --> 00:32:41,760
Say you’re shopping for home theater equipment.

283
00:32:41,760 --> 00:32:44,800
You go to a showroom and see a couple different models.

284
00:32:44,800 --> 00:32:51,720
One set of speakers is extremely expensive, features a lot of bells and whistles, and takes up a lot of space.

285
00:32:51,720 --> 00:32:58,600
The other’s a bit cheaper and smaller, but to the naked ear, doesn’t seem to be much different in terms of quality.

286
00:32:58,600 --> 00:33:05,880
You might be persuaded to buy the bigger and more expensive one because, since it’s bigger and more expensive, it must work better.

287
00:33:05,880 --> 00:33:10,760
But it puts a serious dent in your bank account and is too big for your living room.

288
00:33:10,760 --> 00:33:15,280
And you might not even really be able to tell how well the sound’s working.

289
00:33:15,280 --> 00:33:24,520
If you employed post-purchase rationalization, you’d convince yourself that you made the right decision, that it’s what you wanted to do all along.

290
00:33:24,520 --> 00:33:31,600
You’d tell yourself that you can hear the difference in sound, and you do indeed need fifteen different plugs and ports.

291
00:33:31,600 --> 00:33:37,720
You might know deep down inside that you went overboard, but that knowledge makes you uneasy.

292
00:33:37,720 --> 00:33:41,040
Regret makes you feel stupid, and no one likes that.

293
00:33:41,040 --> 00:33:46,120
So you talk yourself into believing you did the right thing and got exactly what you wanted.

294
00:33:46,120 --> 00:33:54,680
No more regret, just eating boxed macaroni and cheese for dinner for the next two months because you spent so much on new speakers.

295
00:33:54,680 --> 00:34:01,280
This type of post-anything justifying behavior extends far beyond purchases.

296
00:34:01,280 --> 00:34:08,160
These are more commonly known as defense mechanisms, and they allow us to defend our egos from scrutiny and shame.

297
00:34:08,160 --> 00:34:17,160
We do this sometimes when we defend ourselves from others, but here, instead of trying to convince someone else, we are trying to convince ourselves.

298
00:34:17,160 --> 00:34:20,400
Sometimes, we are not even aware we are using them.

299
00:34:20,400 --> 00:34:22,200
That’s the scary part.

300
00:34:22,200 --> 00:34:25,480
Confirmation bias.

301
00:34:25,480 --> 00:34:39,040
Confirmation bias is when we want to believe in a certain “fact” so badly that we only look for and agree with information that supports the belief—and ignore compelling evidence that disproves it.

302
00:34:39,040 --> 00:34:47,280
Instead of “I’ll believe it when I see it,” confirmation bias dictates a standpoint of “I’ll see it when I believe it.”

303
00:34:47,280 --> 00:34:47,280


304
00:34:47,280 --> 00:34:50,760
Confirmation bias happens all the time.

305
00:34:50,760 --> 00:35:01,040
Those of us with any type of political beliefs tend to consume news from sources that support our opinions and block out legitimate sources that offer countering views.

306
00:35:01,040 --> 00:35:12,680
If you are looking to buttress a certain stance that you believe in, you will feel that each supporting source is legitimate and thorough, while each critical source is flawed or has an agenda.

307
00:35:12,680 --> 00:35:18,320
There is only one view that you’ve pre-decided, and you’ll mold the evidence to fit it.

308
00:35:18,320 --> 00:35:20,320
You see it when you believe it.

309
00:35:20,320 --> 00:35:33,600
Even scientists who supposedly hold objectivity in high esteem might suppress or ignore data that challenges their findings just so they have a better chance of getting published by scientific journals.

310
00:35:33,600 --> 00:35:46,720
In fact, this is why an experimental technique called the “double blind” was invented—so scientists didn’t know who they were subjecting to certain conditions, and therefore couldn’t act in confirmatory ways.

311
00:35:46,720 --> 00:35:52,760
We practice confirmation bias because, quite simply, it hurts to be wrong.

312
00:35:52,760 --> 00:36:03,560
Taking the emotional component out of our “truths” as much as possible and being open-minded about divergent views help us combat confirmation bias and think smarter.

313
00:36:03,560 --> 00:36:06,680
Beating Cognitive Bias

314
00:36:06,680 --> 00:36:06,680


315
00:36:06,680 --> 00:36:12,000
So how do we work to defeat cognitive biases that show up in our thinking?

316
00:36:12,000 --> 00:36:17,280
The list of four is helpful, but nowhere close to exhaustive.

317
00:36:17,280 --> 00:36:28,360
The one thing you can start doing immediately, now that you know what cognitive biases are, is become aware of them in your thinking and interactions and note how they affect your sense of belief.

318
00:36:28,360 --> 00:36:36,040
But still, that feels inadequate against some of these thought patterns that have been left unchecked our entire lives.

319
00:36:36,040 --> 00:36:43,280
There are a few specific mental exercises that can help retrain your thinking to become clear-minded and measured.

320
00:36:43,280 --> 00:36:48,200
Practice thinking of alternative explanations.

321
00:36:48,200 --> 00:36:57,320
Instead of making a snap decision about why a certain thing is the way it is, try to think of multiple reasons or causes.

322
00:36:57,320 --> 00:37:01,200
Reserve your judgment and stop jumping to conclusions.

323
00:37:01,200 --> 00:37:06,560
You don’t need to find an answer immediately; emphasize the truth instead of speed.

324
00:37:06,560 --> 00:37:16,040
For example, if you’re sitting in your favorite coffee shop and you notice a huge drop-off in business, you might think it’s because the quality of the coffee has declined.

325
00:37:16,040 --> 00:37:24,360
But it could also be because more people are making their own espresso drinks, or because it’s summer and more people are doing other things outside.

326
00:37:24,360 --> 00:37:29,200
Or perhaps it’s that the prices the store is charging are keeping people away.

327
00:37:29,200 --> 00:37:31,760
(It’s usually that, actually.)

328
00:37:31,760 --> 00:37:36,040
In a sense, this is like reverse storytelling.

329
00:37:36,040 --> 00:37:40,160
You are starting with the conclusion, but you aren’t sure what’s happened.

330
00:37:40,160 --> 00:37:47,440
Instead of jumping to conclusions, you would work backward and theorize what could have contributed to what you currently see.

331
00:37:47,440 --> 00:37:56,640
You might try an exercise of taking a scene, a person, or any other thing, and observing five details or characteristics about it.

332
00:37:56,640 --> 00:38:04,600
Then, for each of those details, write down five possible causes that may have led that particular detail to be the way it is.

333
00:38:04,600 --> 00:38:11,920
Try to vary the potential causes you list, ranging from the plainly realistic to the downright bizarre.

334
00:38:11,920 --> 00:38:24,080
This will train your ability to create a story around every detail, thus giving you twenty-five trains of thought instead of defaulting to the quickest and easiest for your brain to process.

335
00:38:24,080 --> 00:38:29,600
Most of us think only linearly in terms of cause and effect.

336
00:38:29,600 --> 00:38:33,200
But that’s ineffective at best in understanding a situation.

337
00:38:33,200 --> 00:38:37,600
Reword your statements as questions.

338
00:38:37,600 --> 00:38:42,240
Think of something you consider a declarative, absolute truth.

339
00:38:42,240 --> 00:38:48,440
For example: “E-books and e-readers are killing literature.” That’s a pretty strong statement.

340
00:38:48,440 --> 00:39:08,320
But try rephrasing it: “Are e-books and e-readers really killing literature?” The mere act of turning it into a question makes your brain start looking for answers: “Well, maybe e-readers are encouraging more people to read—that’s good.” “They may be changing how we read, but they’re not really killing how literature is made.

341
00:39:08,320 --> 00:39:19,320
Maybe I’m just overly sentimental about physical books.” With just that one shift in your statement, you’ve opened up your mind to a new line of inquiry and exploration.

342
00:39:19,320 --> 00:39:23,640
Get behind and challenge your assumptions.

343
00:39:23,640 --> 00:39:35,280
Let’s say you have a very broad belief about poor people: “They’re poor because they don’t want to work.” Challenge that assumption immediately: “Do poor people just not want to work?

344
00:39:35,280 --> 00:39:37,840
Or do they really have less opportunities?

345
00:39:37,840 --> 00:39:43,600
They’ve been closing plants and stores in town for a few years now—maybe they don’t have anywhere else to go.

346
00:39:43,600 --> 00:39:47,840
And it’s hard to get the proper training for a skilled position when you can’t afford it .

347
00:39:47,840 --> 00:39:47,840
.

348
00:39:47,840 --> 00:39:47,840
.

349
00:39:47,840 --> 00:39:51,160
What if there is something else that causes poverty?

350
00:39:51,160 --> 00:40:06,320
What if there are about fifty shades of gray to this matter?” The harsh truth is that whatever you think you know about a topic, especially if it involves people’s thoughts and motivations, you probably know only about 10 percent of what’s truly happening.

351
00:40:06,320 --> 00:40:20,000
It’s always best to be proactive about challenging your assumptions through self-interrogation and especially through valid news and information sources—including people who have deep experience in the subject you’re thinking of.

352
00:40:20,000 --> 00:40:26,600
It’s uncertain where many of our assumptions come from anyway, so it’s good to reevaluate them from time to time.

353
00:40:26,600 --> 00:40:32,120
Remove pride, ego, and your need to be right.

354
00:40:32,120 --> 00:40:45,240
The truth is a separate pursuit entirely from each of those things, and sometimes there is a stark contrast because you want to feel a certain way about yourself, especially in front of others.

355
00:40:45,240 --> 00:40:55,320
Truth becomes a lot easier to discern when you take your emotional rewards (and punishments) out of the equation and simply try to determine what’s real.

356
00:40:55,320 --> 00:41:04,240
If you face opposition, it’s just going to cause you to dig your heels in and deny, defend, and stonewall.

357
00:41:04,240 --> 00:41:08,840
You’ll be seduced into caring more about dominating someone than understanding.

358
00:41:08,840 --> 00:41:14,920
You’ll want to avoid that sour feeling of shame when conceding defeat to someone—anyone.

359
00:41:14,920 --> 00:41:19,680
Even if you’re right, very few people make friends by saying “I told you so.”

360
00:41:19,680 --> 00:41:19,680


361
00:41:19,680 --> 00:41:27,000
Picture how a desperately stubborn person would act—is that similar to how you are acting?

362
00:41:27,000 --> 00:41:30,320
Could anyone make an honest comparison between the two?

363
00:41:30,320 --> 00:41:31,760
Hopefully not.

364
00:41:31,760 --> 00:41:38,320
Even more so, explore being wrong and understand the feelings that outcome evokes.

365
00:41:38,320 --> 00:41:41,480
Play out scenarios where you are indeed wrong.

366
00:41:41,480 --> 00:41:43,920
What feelings will you experience?

367
00:41:43,920 --> 00:41:51,440
There may be embarrassment, anger, humiliation, or shame—but do they affect the world or your life?

368
00:41:51,440 --> 00:41:53,440
Only if you let them.

369
00:41:53,440 --> 00:41:57,320
Logical Arguments

370
00:41:57,320 --> 00:41:57,320


371
00:41:57,320 --> 00:42:07,040
A final element of watching yourself from afar (not dissimilar to a voyeur) is recognizing the naked truth of what’s being said.

372
00:42:07,040 --> 00:42:14,840
This is deceptively difficult, because just like with cognitive biases, by nature, illogical arguments go unnoticed.

373
00:42:14,840 --> 00:42:24,120
It’s rare that we dissect statements just to understand their logical underpinnings, and that makes for habitually sloppy arguments and poor understanding.

374
00:42:24,120 --> 00:42:30,400
It’s easier than you might think, and it is equally frustrating to see people commit these errors on a daily basis.

375
00:42:30,400 --> 00:42:47,400
There’s a funny, if somewhat cynical, piece of “advice” for people who are a little unsettled about speaking in public: “If you can’t dazzle them with brilliance, baffle them with B.S.” In this context, “B.S.” does not stand for “Bachelor of Science.”

376
00:42:47,400 --> 00:42:47,400


377
00:42:47,400 --> 00:42:57,280
We’ve all been in conversations at least once or twice in our lives in which we realize that the person we’re speaking with is making not one shred of sense.

378
00:42:57,280 --> 00:43:04,040
They might be talking about a crazy theory they have or speaking from a viewpoint that has no basis in reality.

379
00:43:04,040 --> 00:43:11,040
Someone may try to convince you that things are a certain way, but for whatever reason, their words don’t add up.

380
00:43:11,040 --> 00:43:17,480
It causes a cognitive clog in your brain, and you might end up feeling disoriented or lost.

381
00:43:17,480 --> 00:43:23,880
They probably think they’re making sense—they don’t think they’re trying to baffle you with B.S.

382
00:43:23,880 --> 00:43:26,320
But on the other hand, maybe they are.

383
00:43:26,320 --> 00:43:31,640
They might be trying to convolute your thinking with distorted logic and crazy talk.

384
00:43:31,640 --> 00:43:38,640
Whatever the case, you can’t quite put your finger on what’s wrong, and thus you can’t form a rebuttal.

385
00:43:38,640 --> 00:43:41,200
That’s annoying, to say the least.

386
00:43:41,200 --> 00:43:48,040
Someone has gotten the last word on something you’re pretty sure is a bad argument, but you can’t figure out exactly why.

387
00:43:48,040 --> 00:43:57,120
It’s important for you to know that, when these bits of nuttiness are hurled in your direction, it’s not your brain’s fault that you’re not getting them.

388
00:43:57,120 --> 00:44:02,920
The problem isn’t with your comprehension or ability to think—in fact, it’s the opposite.

389
00:44:02,920 --> 00:44:11,480
You’re dealing with someone who is defying the laws of logic, and while your ears are taking it all in, your brain’s not having any of it.

390
00:44:11,480 --> 00:44:12,880
Rightly so.

391
00:44:12,880 --> 00:44:21,040
For the most part, this happens by accident in normal, everyday conversations where people are well-intentioned.

392
00:44:21,040 --> 00:44:31,400
People might be so eager to push a stance that they haven’t done their due diligence, or someone doesn’t pay attention to details and only wants simple sound bites.

393
00:44:31,400 --> 00:44:33,800
We’ve all done it before.

394
00:44:33,800 --> 00:44:43,800
We get caught up in making a firm point, get flustered if we’re not convincing enough, and end up making statements that don’t seem to make any sense, because they don’t.

395
00:44:43,800 --> 00:44:50,240
We spitball on earlier statements in an attempt to salvage an argument, and hope they aren’t picked apart.

396
00:44:50,240 --> 00:44:57,240
This is a situation where it’s beneficial to understand the basic nature of logical thinking and construction.

397
00:44:57,240 --> 00:45:02,960
In the world we live in, this understanding is a crucial mental skill to develop.

398
00:45:02,960 --> 00:45:06,480
It helps us ferret out the truth and process problems.

399
00:45:06,480 --> 00:45:12,520
It imparts the ability to parse arguments and statements and know if they need to be questioned further.

400
00:45:12,520 --> 00:45:19,400
In a way, it’s a mental model in itself—actually more of a mental supermodel.

401
00:45:19,400 --> 00:45:31,280
Dissecting logical arguments sounds complicated—something you’d need an advanced technical or philosophy degree for—but the foundation of logical thinking is actually pretty easy to understand.

402
00:45:31,280 --> 00:45:33,480
The concepts are straightforward.

403
00:45:33,480 --> 00:45:40,400
They use sentence structure and equations to illustrate how certain ways of thinking are more effective than others.

404
00:45:40,400 --> 00:45:47,920
Understanding them breaks down to assessing the different kinds of statements people make in explaining a concept or an argument.

405
00:45:47,920 --> 00:45:53,160
As a quick example, a friend may be trying to remember their shoe size.

406
00:45:53,160 --> 00:45:58,560
They say, “If I am wearing sandals, they will be size nine.” So far, so good.

407
00:45:58,560 --> 00:46:07,440
And then they say, “Therefore, if I am wearing size nine, I am wearing sandals.” Hopefully an alarm has been set off in your brain.

408
00:46:07,440 --> 00:46:11,520
That doesn’t logically add up, and you’re about to learn why.

409
00:46:11,520 --> 00:46:32,360
Conditional statements X -> Y. We’ll use a conditional statement as the core example for all these arguments: “If you feed my dog kibbles, then he’ll be friendly to you.” Just to make things easy to understand, let’s pretend in this discussion that this statement is always true.

410
00:46:32,360 --> 00:46:45,400
This is called a conditional statement because it says, “If this condition is met, then this result will 100 percent happen.” The condition is your feeding your friend’s dog kibbles.

411
00:46:45,400 --> 00:46:48,320
The result is that the dog will be friendly to you.

412
00:46:48,320 --> 00:46:55,520
There is a straight cause-and-effect relationship between the condition and the result, and it only functions in one direction.

413
00:46:55,520 --> 00:47:02,680
Once again, we’re pretending this will always be the case—every time you give this dog a kibble, he’s going to love you.

414
00:47:02,680 --> 00:47:05,760
Using this as a fact, the statement is sound.

415
00:47:05,760 --> 00:47:15,280
We also call the relationship between the condition and the result one of premise and conclusion—broader terms that can be used for other statements.

416
00:47:15,280 --> 00:47:21,080
If a certain premise is true, then you can expect the conclusion or outcome to be true as well.

417
00:47:21,080 --> 00:47:30,680
These types of statements generally don’t present as issues, unless someone is trying to pass off that the conclusion will always be true when it isn’t.

418
00:47:30,680 --> 00:47:34,280
It’s when you start to play with it that problems arise.

419
00:47:34,280 --> 00:47:38,600
Converse statements Y -> X.

420
00:47:38,600 --> 00:47:45,360
Now, consider this statement: “If my dog’s friendly to you, it’s because you fed him kibbles.”

421
00:47:45,360 --> 00:47:45,360


422
00:47:45,360 --> 00:47:53,120
Well—that’s certainly a possibility, since we’ve determined that feeding the dog kibbles is a surefire way to win his friendliness.

423
00:47:53,120 --> 00:47:56,200
But is it the only way to make the dog friendly?

424
00:47:56,200 --> 00:47:57,840
Maybe you petted him.

425
00:47:57,840 --> 00:48:01,760
Perhaps you spoke to him in a gentle, friendly tone of voice.

426
00:48:01,760 --> 00:48:08,280
Maybe you played a game of fetch with him that made him extremely happy, and he returned his happiness with affection.

427
00:48:08,280 --> 00:48:10,320
Maybe the dog is in a good mood.

428
00:48:10,320 --> 00:48:11,600
Dogs do that.

429
00:48:11,600 --> 00:48:24,120
This is an example of a converse statement: it reverses the conclusion and the premise, or the result and the condition—it is saying that the prerequisite is true if the end result is true.

430
00:48:24,120 --> 00:48:27,160
And it’s turned the statement into a logical flaw.

431
00:48:27,160 --> 00:48:31,000
It’s true that feeding the dog kibbles will make him your friend.

432
00:48:31,000 --> 00:48:36,120
But there’s no indication that he’s friends with you strictly because you fed him kibbles.

433
00:48:36,120 --> 00:48:39,360
There are other ways you can make a dog friendly to you.

434
00:48:39,360 --> 00:48:41,000
You’ve just caught someone.

435
00:48:41,000 --> 00:48:49,320
Remember, a statement only has cause and effect in one direction—from condition to result, and not the other way around.

436
00:48:49,320 --> 00:48:57,640
A converse statement is the direct parent of something called the false syllogism—basically, a false premise.

437
00:48:57,640 --> 00:49:04,200
Its fallacy is also exposed in making leaps of judgment based on misunderstood connections, like this:

438
00:49:04,200 --> 00:49:04,200


439
00:49:04,200 --> 00:49:06,240
• Dogs love kibbles.

440
00:49:06,240 --> 00:49:08,360
• Monkeys love kibbles.

441
00:49:08,360 --> 00:49:10,760
• Therefore, dogs are monkeys.

442
00:49:10,760 --> 00:49:14,720
In this statement, the two premises might be true.

443
00:49:14,720 --> 00:49:19,480
But the fact that both dogs and monkeys like kibbles doesn’t mean they’re the same thing.

444
00:49:19,480 --> 00:49:27,000
The premise used for establishing the conclusion—mutual kibble love—is therefore false, as is the conclusion.

445
00:49:27,000 --> 00:49:33,040
Inverse statements Not X -> Not Y.

446
00:49:33,040 --> 00:49:39,600
Okay, let’s try this one on for size: “If you don’t feed my dog kibbles, he won’t be friendly to you.”

447
00:49:39,600 --> 00:49:39,600


448
00:49:39,600 --> 00:49:40,800
Really?

449
00:49:40,800 --> 00:49:42,760
That’s the kind of dog you have?

450
00:49:42,760 --> 00:49:50,520
If I don’t feed him kibbles—if I’ve run out or, you know, just don’t carry kibbles on me out of habit—then he’s going to turn on me?

451
00:49:50,520 --> 00:49:51,920
What an ingrate.

452
00:49:51,920 --> 00:49:54,880
This is an inverse statement.

453
00:49:54,880 --> 00:50:09,800
It preserves the premise-conclusion relationship of the original statement but turns it into a negative: “If this doesn’t happen, then this won’t happen as a result.” It assumes a deeper relationship between the two than actually exists.

454
00:50:09,800 --> 00:50:16,120
Cause and effect certainly doesn’t work if the lack of a cause means the lack of an effect.

455
00:50:16,120 --> 00:50:21,080
Inverse statements are trickier, because not all of them are wrong.

456
00:50:21,080 --> 00:50:27,760
Sometimes they’re right: “If you don’t brush your teeth, then they won’t be healthy.” Well, that’s true.

457
00:50:27,760 --> 00:50:31,280
But it leaves out that there are other ways to make your teeth unhealthy.

458
00:50:31,280 --> 00:50:35,920
Constantly eating food that’s bad for your teeth, for example (even if you do brush).

459
00:50:35,920 --> 00:50:41,160
It could very well be that the dog rejects all who do not bring him kibbles.

460
00:50:41,160 --> 00:50:50,840
I don’t know this particular dog’s neurosis when it comes to being fed kibbles at the appropriate time; I suppose it’s possible lack of kibbles turns him into a hostile, nervous wreck.

461
00:50:50,840 --> 00:50:54,680
Still, the dog may be unfriendly for other reasons.

462
00:50:54,680 --> 00:50:59,560
Maybe he just got back from chasing a car that he didn’t catch, so he’s a little disappointed.

463
00:50:59,560 --> 00:51:01,280
Maybe he’s in a bad mood.

464
00:51:01,280 --> 00:51:03,280
Maybe you’ve insulted him.

465
00:51:03,280 --> 00:51:05,320
Maybe he was recently neutered.

466
00:51:05,320 --> 00:51:10,280
There are plenty of things that can tick this dog off besides kibble deprivation.

467
00:51:10,280 --> 00:51:15,600
So while certain inverse statements might be right, not all of them will be.

468
00:51:15,600 --> 00:51:19,360
Be extra cautious and don’t take them at face value.

469
00:51:19,360 --> 00:51:26,960
Many things will try to pass themselves off as true statements, but you can begin to see that most of them are logical flaws.

470
00:51:26,960 --> 00:51:33,440
Contrapositive statements Not Y -> Not X.

471
00:51:33,440 --> 00:51:39,920
These are statements that negate both the premise and the conclusion—both backward and forward.

472
00:51:39,920 --> 00:51:49,320
If the original conditional statement is correct, then the contrapositive is also always true, unlike the converse or inverse statements.

473
00:51:49,320 --> 00:51:54,080
This type of relationship does exist both ways, because it’s about a negative.

474
00:51:54,080 --> 00:52:04,920
In our trusty dog food analogy, the contrapositive would be “If my dog is unfriendly to you, then you didn’t give him kibbles.” This is true.

475
00:52:04,920 --> 00:52:09,680
There could be many reasons why the dog is being a jerk (see above).

476
00:52:09,680 --> 00:52:16,680
But one thing’s for sure: if he’s unfriendly, then for sure you haven’t given him any of his cure-all kibbles.

477
00:52:16,680 --> 00:52:19,680
If you did, the dog would be more agreeable.

478
00:52:19,680 --> 00:52:22,200
But he isn’t, so you haven’t.

479
00:52:22,200 --> 00:52:29,080
Remember, that part is a given, so if the result is not true, then the given is also not true.

480
00:52:29,080 --> 00:52:34,520
Another quick example: if you go swimming, you will be wet.

481
00:52:34,520 --> 00:52:37,720
What might the contrapositive statement sound like?

482
00:52:37,720 --> 00:52:40,880
If you are not wet, you did not go swimming.

483
00:52:40,880 --> 00:52:43,400
That certainly seems to make sense.

484
00:52:43,400 --> 00:52:52,120
It can take a bit of effort to decipher these types of logical statements, but once you do, you’ll find that you can understand the truth of matters instantly.

485
00:52:52,120 --> 00:52:52,560
3040

486
00:52:52,560 --> 00:52:55,400
Takeaways:

487
00:52:55,400 --> 00:52:55,400


488
00:52:55,400 --> 00:53:00,600
• This chapter has a tall task—to get you to think about your thinking.

489
00:53:00,600 --> 00:53:07,000
When we’re not engaging in what is known as metacognition, it’s easy to veer off the path of clear thought.

490
00:53:07,000 --> 00:53:11,360
You must become aware of your thought patterns and where you tend to stray.

491
00:53:11,360 --> 00:53:16,160
Watch yourself and try to evaluate what’s happening inside your brain.

492
00:53:16,160 --> 00:53:23,240
• This process begins with System 1 and 2 thinking, as conceived by Daniel Kahneman.

493
00:53:23,240 --> 00:53:29,840
System 1 thinking is quick, instinctual, and decisive—and also often incorrect.

494
00:53:29,840 --> 00:53:36,080
System 2 thinking is measured, calm, and analytical—and far slower and more difficult.

495
00:53:36,080 --> 00:53:48,000
Unfortunately, the brain operates on the principle of least resistance, so while System 1 thinking is first and foremost, we want to get into the habit of System 2 thinking on a consistent basis.

496
00:53:48,000 --> 00:53:58,480
The easier and more familiar a task becomes, the more instinctual and quick it can be, so the way to clearer thinking is consistent repetition and practice.

497
00:53:58,480 --> 00:54:11,880
• Cognitive biases are a similar concept, where we leap to conclusions because they appear to fit schema or heuristics we are familiar with, or are simply in line with our personal experiences.

498
00:54:11,880 --> 00:54:15,320
These can also be effective, but often wrong.

499
00:54:15,320 --> 00:54:32,360
Notable biases include: availability heuristic (I can remember it, so that means it is important), gambler’s fallacy (X happened, which means Y must happen), post-purchase rationalization (I made a good decision .

500
00:54:32,360 --> 00:54:32,360
.

501
00:54:32,360 --> 00:54:32,360
.

502
00:54:32,360 --> 00:54:36,920
), and confirmation bias (I only read what I want to read).

503
00:54:36,920 --> 00:54:44,200
• How can you overcome cognitive biases, aside from simple awareness and metacognition?

504
00:54:44,200 --> 00:54:59,000
There are four keys: alternative explanations and reverse storytelling, rewording statements and assumptions as questions, getting behind your implicit assumptions, and removing pride and ego from the equation.

505
00:54:59,000 --> 00:55:06,800
• Finally, it’s important to understand logical arguments—and especially illogical arguments.

506
00:55:06,800 --> 00:55:11,000
We hear these every day but may not be able to pick out their logical flaws.

507
00:55:11,000 --> 00:55:19,520
You can think of these as a combination of math and argumentation that allows us to see the reality versus what you see or hear.

508
00:55:19,520 --> 00:55:40,160
There is the conditional statement (X -> Y, true), the converse statement (Y -> X, usually a flaw), the inverse statement (Not X -> Not Y, usually a flaw), and the contrapositive statement (Not Y -> Not X, true).

509
00:55:40,160 --> 00:55:47,040
It’s not just word games; it’s understanding the foundations upon which real and false arguments are built.

510
00:55:47,040 --> 00:55:58,520
Alright, that brings us to the end of another episode, and that was a tough one.

511
00:55:58,520 --> 00:56:02,240
A lot of material in there, thanks for staying on to the very end.

512
00:56:02,240 --> 00:56:13,120
You know, by understanding the dual processing nature of our brains, we can learn to recognize when our thoughts may be leading us astray due to those cognitive biases we all have.

513
00:56:13,120 --> 00:56:25,480
And overcoming those biases is a challenging task, but with awareness and commitment, we can improve our decision-making abilities and navigate towards clearer thought processes.

514
00:56:25,480 --> 00:56:39,240
And remember that practice makes perfect in all endeavors of life, by consistently and consciously engaging in system 2 thinking and in analyzing the logical foundations upon which arguments are built.

515
00:56:39,240 --> 00:56:45,640
We can train ourselves, gradually, away from common pitfalls of incorrect reasoning.

516
00:56:45,640 --> 00:56:57,360
This not only makes us better thinkers, but also helps us become more adept at discerning truth amidst an ever-increasing sea of information that surrounds us daily.

517
00:56:57,360 --> 00:57:02,800
We'll leave you with a quote by Benjamin Franklin to help inspire your day.

518
00:57:02,800 --> 00:57:05,400
Tell me, and I forget.

519
00:57:05,400 --> 00:57:07,800
Teach me, and I may remember.

520
00:57:07,800 --> 00:57:14,280
Involve me, and I learn.