Speaker:

There is so much out there to get mad about. Social injustices, class warfare, continued

Speaker:

colonization, the act of destruction of our planet by those focused on prophets and not

Speaker:

people. We can find it overwhelming at times. The good news is there are equally as many,

Speaker:

if not more, stories of people coming together and rising up against the forces at play. So

Speaker:

the creators of Blueprints of Disruption have added a new weekly segment, Ravel Rants, where

Speaker:

we will unpack the stories that have us most riled up, share calls to action, and most importantly,

Speaker:

celebrate resistance. Welcome back to Ravel Rants. We've got a lot to talk about today.

Speaker:

We're gonna keep talking about Palestine, though as usual, it will have that Canadian connection.

Speaker:

We really need to update you from the stories that we included in our last rabble rant, namely

Speaker:

MLA Selena Robinson and her downfall. We're also going to talk about reports coming out

Speaker:

of Nicaragua and perhaps an ICJ case looming against Canada. We're also going to get into

Speaker:

Canada's so-called special visa program and the other performative shit that's coming out

Speaker:

of our federal government. But... Like I said, an update on Selena Robinson. So Santiago,

Speaker:

she did get some punishment, right? In our last episode, we were really frustrated that almost

Speaker:

nobody, but I think Charlie Angus at that point, and Matthew Green came out quickly soon after.

Speaker:

We did see Jagmeet Singh make a statement a little bit wishy washy. There were some folks

Speaker:

that were very clear within the NDP that they were displeased with. MLA Robinson, but surely

Speaker:

it was the relentless actions of activists that solidified her resignation from the, her minister's

Speaker:

position. So she's still in MLA. She's trying to hold onto that. She's still in the party,

Speaker:

but she's not in the cabinet anymore. This didn't get a lot of airtime, but her position in the

Speaker:

cabinet is actually significant. She was in charge of post-secondary education. And she

Speaker:

had used that position to have a teacher fired for their Palestinian views. And so it's really

Speaker:

ironic that there's backlash to the backlash when the person being targeted here has a history

Speaker:

of holding people accountable for their political views, if they don't jive with the folks that

Speaker:

make decisions. And I think a lot of people are trying to argue that it shouldn't be the

Speaker:

electorate. or constituents or NDP members that should actually determine if she stays in office.

Speaker:

So when I say the activists were relentless, I mean, they showed up at a caucus retreat

Speaker:

and it looked like some of them from the videos that they posted got inside. And what really

Speaker:

frustrated me was you could hear them calling for the MLAs that they could get into eyeshot

Speaker:

with, calling them by name. with a real familiar tone as though they've worked with them before.

Speaker:

And I imagine if you're an activist in BC, you've had to work with members of the ruling party,

Speaker:

especially the NDP at this point. And so, but that got them nowhere. The political class

Speaker:

is really closing ranks on this issue. And I think that's for multiple reasons, not just

Speaker:

because some of them actually hold Zionist views. but because they didn't like the way that their

Speaker:

own base held them accountable. They didn't like the way they were potentially being removed

Speaker:

from office without having an election. It's, it's, they're always trying to drive home this

Speaker:

artificial point that the ballot box is the be-all end-all of democracy. And everything

Speaker:

outside of that is labeled as like intimidation, harassment. Premier Ebb use that old line that

Speaker:

we've heard so many times in the NDP, at least people who are trying to reform it, that those

Speaker:

protesters were just trying to divide the party, right? Trying to sow discord in politics, like

Speaker:

that was their only goal and it wasn't to actually hold somebody accountable. So I'm actually

Speaker:

loving how the ruling political class and adjacent are. really upset about the backlash that Robinson

Speaker:

faced. Yeah, there's a certain level of irony there though, isn't there? Talking about, you

Speaker:

know, ballot box and democracy as, you know, David Eby, how did he get into power? I mean,

Speaker:

at the end of the day, it was uncontested because they expelled the only candidate that was running

Speaker:

against them, right? So it's not like the ballot box got him there in the first place, right?

Speaker:

And I think that there's, you know, I don't know if I was expecting them to remove her,

Speaker:

but I think it's important to like, you know, because everyone's drawing the comparisons

Speaker:

between this and Sarah Jama, right? And it needs to be mentioned like, yeah, they didn't do

Speaker:

this out of a sense of morality or what is right, you know, they did this, as you said, because

Speaker:

of the pressure. And it took them. quite a few days to do so, right? It's not like with Sarah

Speaker:

Jammer, which was quick, right? This was, they had to because of the pressure. Yeah, Robinson,

Speaker:

you know, tried to issue an apology. We talked about that in the last episode and then they

Speaker:

tried to seed a little bit more by agreeing to take anti-Islamophobia training, which I

Speaker:

need to point out is like not the issue. again, not all Palestinians are Muslim, and it's a

Speaker:

very unique type of racism that Palestinians and their allies face. And it needs to be named

Speaker:

that way, in the fact that they couldn't even acknowledge or say Palestine in response to

Speaker:

all of that she's done in the past few months. Because in the end, it wasn't just those statements

Speaker:

and a few tweets that she— People then poured over her accounts that she's now deleted. And

Speaker:

it was endless by her and her husband just completely perpetuating the worst Zionist narratives.

Speaker:

Some things that even Zionists don't even try to argue, like that all Jewish people have

Speaker:

a birthright to Israel. And that it was just astonishing, the breadth of it. And she has

Speaker:

been elected since 2013. I imagine people have encountered her racism many, many times over

Speaker:

and she's maintained power. So it's absolutely to the credit of the people who put pressure

Speaker:

in all kinds of ways. I mean, they were forced to cancel a big fundraiser and that would have

Speaker:

cost them a lot of money, right? They'd already booked the venue, everything. It was probably

Speaker:

the day before that they canceled. So they were really feeling the heat in BC. and rightly

Speaker:

so. But then you have folks like Abby Lewis coming out this morning and calling the action

Speaker:

outside of Selena Robinson's office childish and feeding into our detractors narrative that

Speaker:

it was just inherently anti-Semitic because she's Jewish. It was Post-It notes and shock.

Speaker:

And again, it's like that episode we did with Skye Johnson where papers on windows are getting

Speaker:

people to really clutch their pearls and frame it as something more than what it is. And I

Speaker:

think, again, that goes back to the point of the ruling elite just being really afraid.

Speaker:

They're seeing themselves in these politicians, even if they're not elected. And they don't

Speaker:

like that idea. They don't want to be a Melanie Jolie and have their house and their neighborhood

Speaker:

disrupted. And Like I've said before, I believe it is part of their role to rein us in, always.

Speaker:

These folks that, especially folks like Avi Lewis and Naomi Klein, because we know that

Speaker:

they know the urgency. Like if you're talking about climate action or if you're talking about

Speaker:

stopping a genocide in Palestine and they're like what then advocating for really measured

Speaker:

responses and... stick to petitions and respectful protest. And that's the opposite of what the

Speaker:

movement needs to progress. And it's always from this really privileged political position

Speaker:

where they're used to getting a phone call back from people they need to speak to. They're

Speaker:

used to having a huge platform, book tours, where they can share their ideas and people

Speaker:

will listen and then share on. Not everybody has that access. Some people need to leave

Speaker:

post-it notes on their MLAs window because that's the only time they can actually communicate

Speaker:

with them. Your emails don't actually go to them. Your phone calls don't get through to

Speaker:

them. And it's again, this political elitist class trying to cut off avenues for actual

Speaker:

change, right? And trying to keep us in this really narrow definition of protest. And they

Speaker:

have no right to be doing that. You know, it comes back to the conversation we had last

Speaker:

episode, I think about standards, right? The standards that were held to versus the standards

Speaker:

that they're held to, right? Because this is the most tame shit. Like, some chalk, some

Speaker:

papers that can be taken down, you know? That is incredibly, incredibly mild. Like, there's

Speaker:

no actual permanent... damage here whatsoever. It's people communicating with their politicians

Speaker:

and holding them accountable. And I mentioned the double standards because, you know, look

Speaker:

at how much it took for something, for action to be taken. It took blatantly racist comments.

Speaker:

It took a pattern of blatantly racist comments. You know, this was something that has been

Speaker:

happening over time. It took all of this public outrage and it still took them days to come

Speaker:

to this decision. That is not the standard that we're held to whatsoever. It's not fair and

Speaker:

it's fucked up, but that's the situation. We know who has the power here. Like we know where

Speaker:

the loyalties of those in power lie. And it's not with the people who are putting up messages

Speaker:

with chalk. It's with... the people who get outraged at messages with chalk. One thing

Speaker:

that bugs me about what Avi Lewis did as well was not just that he criticized a tactic, which

Speaker:

I really don't appreciate, especially when it comes from the powerful, to be honest.

Speaker:

But that wasn't it. It was like he was pleading with journalists to do the right thing. please

Speaker:

don't associate this with the movement. As though one, he spoke for the fucking movement, which

Speaker:

I don't know how that's possible. That's a really arrogant way to position yourself. But two,

Speaker:

be pleading with the same people who have already set this narrative that anything that they

Speaker:

do is a pro-Khamas, anti-Jewish hate rally. You know, there's already that narrative that

Speaker:

exists in the media and he's pleading with them? Like, please, please don't judge me by those

Speaker:

actions. Like, how dare you? How dare you? And I'm gonna give a little bit of, maybe I won't.

Speaker:

I mean, I'll say that like it's quite ironic and given his history, right? You know, I've

Speaker:

talked to Javi Lewis before and, you know, he, for example, has told me, Like he's about,

Speaker:

oh yeah, you know, I apologize and condemn for the actions of my family, my dad and grandfather.

Speaker:

They were people who were some of the people involved in breaking up the waffle back in

Speaker:

the day, right? Then he's going and doing the same things, right? Yeah, like moderating the

Speaker:

left, trying to keep us kind of bottled up. That's how it feels. Like, especially with

Speaker:

you and I working so hard to get people to realize their power and to explore so many avenues

Speaker:

to pressure power and to build community and solidarity. And it's just, it feels like they're

Speaker:

trying to do the opposite, but with the same fucking knowledge that we have. And so that

Speaker:

really makes me mad. And I could spend time criticizing the fact that, you know, Lisa McLeod

Speaker:

is also up in arms about how we are harassing politicians and that conservatives think exactly

Speaker:

the same way Selena Robinson does. And clearly a lot of liberals, right? Melanie Jolie will

Speaker:

not go on skate in this episode. But the reason I end up focusing on the NDP or people that

Speaker:

present themselves as leftists is because, again, like I said, they know better, but they have

Speaker:

this sphere of influence in the same set of people we're going to need to rely on to do

Speaker:

something more. And so if they are listening to them and holding them on the pedestal that

Speaker:

we tend to do with people, especially rich people, especially people who have platforms, you know,

Speaker:

that's what platforms are. right, pedestals. And they have the ability to prevent meaningful

Speaker:

change. And I wonder if they know that they're doing it, if it's that discomfort that they

Speaker:

just naturally feel, especially coming from a political family, like do they see daddy's

Speaker:

office being plastered and vandalized and harassed at dinner and they just don't want that for

Speaker:

them or themselves? Or is it like, do they think it's actually a bad tactical maneuver? And

Speaker:

if I would say that they're wrong, but they're entitled to have a difference of opinion, but

Speaker:

they're not entitled to use those platforms to actually slam people who are doing good

Speaker:

work or doing work. Like, you don't have to agree with everybody's tactics, right? But

Speaker:

like, stop drawing the line of fucking post-it notes and shock. Like, surely there's further

Speaker:

extremes you're going to allow people to go to stop a genocide. Yeah, yeah, no, it's one

Speaker:

of these things where it's like, in this current moment, saying these things is just so particularly

Speaker:

offensive, I think. Right? Because we should be doing much more. I mean, you know, in Montreal,

Speaker:

they were just blocking up some train tracks, you know, there's been, you know, the barricading

Speaker:

of some arms manufacturers in Canada, you know, good work. stuff that we should be doing. It's

Speaker:

a lot more direct than some chalk. Like some chalk is like what I expect. These things are

Speaker:

what I, and it's the same thing, you know, like in Humber, you know, a student was going around

Speaker:

putting stickers and they got kicked out for it. I mean, eventually they had to apologize

Speaker:

to him, but it's, you know, it's the same thing where it's like, really, is this that offensive

Speaker:

to you? Is this that inconvenient for you? Get like some... Get a hose, wash it away. We'll

Speaker:

come back and chalk it up again. But like, fuck, this takes minimal effort for you to address.

Speaker:

This is not an inconvenience on you. You know what is an inconvenience? Genocide. A lot more

Speaker:

than an inconvenience. And that's what's happening. And we're directly complicit and responsible

Speaker:

in it. So like, focus, like, I don't know about you. Like, I'm pretty tired, you know, running

Speaker:

around, lots of things going on. I had to pick and choose where I spend my energy right now,

Speaker:

you know? There's a lot more happening than what I can possibly address or participate

Speaker:

in, so I had to pick and choose. I can't imagine being in a position where I'd have the energy

Speaker:

to be talking about chalk instead of talking about a genocide, you know? I cannot fathom

Speaker:

that. So like, fuck off.

Speaker:

Like, it's almost comical to have to, like, I don't know what to say about this, fuck off.

Speaker:

Like. Okay, I'm gonna give them a kernel of credibility in that clearly it's not the chalk

Speaker:

or the post-it notes that's really upsetting. I think it's just the overall harassment like

Speaker:

the thing was plastered. really plastered and that's kind of hit in the feels of some folks

Speaker:

who that were talking about but there was the use of the word Nazi that has triggered a certain

Speaker:

response. Obviously the word Nazi, when you're also talking about a Jewish person, will invoke

Speaker:

certain, you know, intergenerational trauma, shall we say? So, this is a difficult one for

Speaker:

me because I don't tend to use that language to describe Israel, but not because you can't

Speaker:

make a fair comparison. I, that is, that can be done. But it's because it generates responses

Speaker:

like this, this knee-jerk reaction almost shuts down the conversation, very reactive language.

Speaker:

However, I will defend people's right to do it because it is not a form of Holocaust denial.

Speaker:

It's not antisemitism. Surely that's obvious now. as we see the remaining population of

Speaker:

Gaza, with much of Palestine now, pushed into a tiny parcel of land that's now surrounded

Speaker:

by openly genocidal troops that have proven bent on eliminating everything Palestinian

Speaker:

or adjacent, and they have been squeezing these people and isolating them and exiling them

Speaker:

and killing them because of who they are for many, many years. And it's all based on an

Speaker:

ideology that pins one type of person as more worthy than others, and spends a lot of its

Speaker:

resources dehumanizing and isolating a certain set of peoples and torturing them slowly. So

Speaker:

there's fucking parallels to be made, right? But the Holocaust was fucking horrific, that's

Speaker:

the point, because this is horrific. This has the same patterns. And it was It's the same

Speaker:

attempt to scapegoat, remove, and then erase an entire set of people who don't fit a certain

Speaker:

image. And people should be allowed to make those comparisons, but they should also know,

Speaker:

like we talked in the last episode about like protecting the movement and making certain

Speaker:

calls about messaging, then sometimes when you use certain messaging, although it might be

Speaker:

valid, it causes problems that you perhaps shouldn't have had to deal with. don't want to deal with.

Speaker:

Right? So that's a tough one. I get that. But at the same time, it comes back to like just

Speaker:

the current moment and, you know, the overwhelming amount of things that are happening. And it's

Speaker:

like, you know, I just could not imagine that catching my attention more than other things,

Speaker:

you know? But you're not Jewish. No, I know. But in Canadian education, we know that like

Speaker:

we're taught. very clearly about, you know, World War II, the Nazis, this is like the great

Speaker:

evil. It's what comes, when horrible things happen, it's what comes to mind. Like, I get

Speaker:

that, right? Is there a level of sensitivity we had? Of course there is. But look at what

Speaker:

we're talking about right now. Like, we're talking about an active genocide being occurred. Like,

Speaker:

maybe there are bigger things to focus on, you know? Just... Perhaps. I just, I don't have,

Speaker:

like right now, and I guess I'll segue a little bit here, but you know, Nicaragua was just

Speaker:

sending a message to Canada, UK, Germany, and Netherlands about the possibility of taking

Speaker:

them to the ICJ over complicits, complicitness, of being complicit. in genocide, right? They

Speaker:

send a very strongly worded memo about this, talking about, you know, the continued arms,

Speaker:

the continued support financially with arms to Israel, the cutting off of UNRWA, which

Speaker:

they describe as collective punishment, which, you know, again, not allowed, and, you know,

Speaker:

the lack of action because Once there is even the possibility of a genocide happening, it

Speaker:

demands action, yet everything we're doing is doubling down, right? That was happening at

Speaker:

the same time as all of these things. This has been happening for a few days now. It's gotten

Speaker:

very, very little attention, but it's showing, you know, the eyes of the world are seeing

Speaker:

what's going on here in Canada. They're seeing the actions of our government. And yet, what

Speaker:

are we focusing on? You know, these are people in power with platforms. Are they doing everything

Speaker:

in their ability to hold Canada accountable? No, they're part of it. I just, I just don't

Speaker:

have a lot of room for them to be making moral arguments when they're failing to their moral

Speaker:

obligations, you know, like we'll criticize. When people in our movement step out of line,

Speaker:

you know, we. We're happy to do that because we're living up to our end of things as much

Speaker:

as we can. You don't get to do that if you're not doing what you have to do. And when you're

Speaker:

someone in power, when Avi Lewis, for example, has a fucking massive platform, he talks, people

Speaker:

listen. Is he doing everything he could do? No, I don't think so. And it's one of those

Speaker:

things where I have a lot of room for understanding of like, everyone has their own. own limitations

Speaker:

of how much energy they can or cannot put into something, he can be doing more. And not doing

Speaker:

it to me, just shut up. Don't talk. Like I don't want to hear you if you're not. And definitely

Speaker:

don't claim to represent me. You know, you trying to talk for the movement, you don't talk for

Speaker:

me. I wanna go back to that Nicaragua memorandum that went out to folks that I know you're still

Speaker:

trying to dig up some details and it's still to be seen how that goes, but it really does

Speaker:

open up a discussion on. Canada being named in the very few countries that are named. Now,

Speaker:

folks might notice that the United States isn't in the list of countries that Nicaragua has

Speaker:

targeted in, and surely a case can be made, or the case can be made that Israel, I even

Speaker:

get them mixed up, that the United States is more than complicit in this, but when I went

Speaker:

to go find what I could, you Google, Nicaragua and the ICJ and you get hits on a case from

Speaker:

1984 where Nicaragua took the United States to the same court we saw South Africa and Israel

Speaker:

in. They were challenging the U.S. on their usual tactics of supplying, arming, training

Speaker:

paramilitaries to operate within Nicaragua and also using their own U.S. military to operate

Speaker:

on sovereign Nicaraguan soil and they won, obviously, because there's no lack of evidence that the

Speaker:

United States not only does this, but has a pattern of doing this. And although the United

Speaker:

States showed up at court at first and used the same Israeli tactic of trying to say, you

Speaker:

know, you don't have jurisdiction over us, like, I don't know why the world court wouldn't and

Speaker:

why the world court gets to decide. And then in turn, yes, we do. But either way, that's

Speaker:

what happened. So once that happened, United States, well, we're just not coming anymore.

Speaker:

So they just stopped showing up the proceedings. Obviously the ruling went against them and

Speaker:

nothing happened from it. They just ignored it. They pretended it didn't happen and it

Speaker:

really didn't benefit Nicaragua all that much. I mean, I'm sure they felt very validated and

Speaker:

history will show that that's in fact exactly what the United States was doing there. but

Speaker:

it just speaks to that conversation around international law and how we're gonna hold these countries,

Speaker:

including our own, accountable. And I don't think it's those institutions that are gonna

Speaker:

do it, right? If you want Melanesia Lee to know just how horrible her actions are and Trudeau,

Speaker:

I think you are gonna have to show up and fight their house. You are gonna have to make sure

Speaker:

they cannot dine in peace. You are gonna have to remove them from their positions because

Speaker:

otherwise all these avenues are kind of just... set up as performative and resource wasting,

Speaker:

frankly, you know, like it's great to have validation, but we've had no impact on Israel since the

Speaker:

ICJ ruling. I know, you know, Dimitri and we spent a good chunk of that episode talking

Speaker:

about the positives, like the confirmation that kind of came from that and that it, you know,

Speaker:

it didn't ask for a ceasefire. But in... It did. However, as we anticipated, it has not

Speaker:

really manufactured anything for the people of Gaza. They have not seen the fruits of that

Speaker:

at all. So, and our government has not responded in a way, like you mentioned, that says that

Speaker:

this court ruling happened. They've doubled down. We just need Melanesia Lee sanction Hamas.

Speaker:

What the fuck?

Speaker:

It's one of those things where it's like, if Canada on October 7th comes out and says, we're

Speaker:

sanctioning the leaders of Hamas, yada yada, you're making a statement here. To do it early

Speaker:

February, after the ICJ ruling, after everything, kind of out of nowhere, it kind of speaks volumes

Speaker:

about... what kind of message they're trying to send to us. You know, I think Melanie Jolie

Speaker:

has just, oh God, she's been absolutely awful. I think she makes Chrisia Freeland very proud.

Speaker:

Like the CBC Pitchbot is not satire anymore. It stopped being satire like a hundred days

Speaker:

ago. Someone fund the CBC Pitchbot to actually do coverage because I'm guaranteed it'll do

Speaker:

better journalism than the CBC at this point. non-stop get it they get it like you guys haven't

Speaker:

done enough damage already like Withdrawing aid and now trying to sanction Hamas and sure

Speaker:

yeah, okay I get what you're saying about if they had done it earlier I mean people would

Speaker:

have been totally justified you get it and I'm not saying that things that happened on October

Speaker:

7th are Are to be celebrated. All right, but at this point At this point, there's only one

Speaker:

set of people with arms that are willing to stop snipers, Israeli snipers from shooting

Speaker:

children. Right? Like, we are watching a set of people that are now herded into a tiny area.

Speaker:

Leaflets are being dropped on Rafah, the last place, and ground troops are encircling it.

Speaker:

Carpet bombing is happening in this last safe zone. And the only people, the only armed entity

Speaker:

to the Houthi rebels, okay, so no, that's not right, but okay, so the only armed entities

Speaker:

that dare stop them, whether it be Hezbollah, Hamas, the Houthi rebels, Iran, they're all

Speaker:

just immediately painted as bad guys and you want to disarm them all. But also at the same

Speaker:

time, you're not willing to like send in your peacekeepers. You're not willing to sanction

Speaker:

Israel. You're still arming them to the teeth. Like at what point does this not become insane?

Speaker:

Are peacekeepers even still a thing? Like, like I remember learning about that in elementary

Speaker:

school and thinking, Oh, that's the coolest thing ever. You know, it's that that's not

Speaker:

a thing. Right. Like. You think that they would have already sent them if it was a thing. It's

Speaker:

a very selective thing. I think we've no one's really met their obligations in terms of peacekeeping.

Speaker:

They've not ever been peacekeepers. So, like, I hope everyone heard the irony in my voice

Speaker:

when I said that. And that's the thing is that, like, you know, Canada, you know, Lester B.

Speaker:

Pearson was supposed to be like the founder of that whole thing, right? We're it's supposed

Speaker:

to be part of like I was taught as a kid that like that was Canadian identity, the Canada

Speaker:

goes. to ensure peace in the world. Now we're like, Israel has a right to carpet bomb whoever

Speaker:

they want to carpet bomb for whatever reason that they want to carpet bomb, which I mean,

Speaker:

that's a subtext behind it all, right? And I mean, like there are performative things that

Speaker:

we could be doing that we're not doing. You know what I mean? There are like things that

Speaker:

don't change anything at all. Like we could be putting out messages like we strongly condemn.

Speaker:

the killing of any civilians and we ask Israel to cease hostilities.

Speaker:

We could be performative about this. We could be saying things and not actually changing

Speaker:

anything. We're not even doing that. Oh, we are. I've got one for that. I got one for that

Speaker:

category. Our so-called special visa program for... people trapped in Gaza. So, you know,

Speaker:

we're good. We welcome refugees, right? We brought over tens of thousands of Ukrainian refugees

Speaker:

and yeah, fundraisers. You know, we have these special kind of visa programs that they instituted

Speaker:

here for getting people out of Gaza who had family here in Canada. And the liberals were

Speaker:

celebrated. We, you know. Total disclaimer, we've always been wary of the attempt to relocate

Speaker:

Palestinians as the only mechanism of Canadian involvement. I mean, that's just feeding into

Speaker:

the exile of more Palestinians. But people do need to escape Gaza, right? Folks are injured,

Speaker:

folks want to get out of there for obvious reasons. And so our special visa program, now if you've

Speaker:

heard our other episode, a reminder that Israel holds the secure- the last say on security

Speaker:

clearance for these folks. So to start, but it's only for a thousand people and for three

Speaker:

years only. And those people that qualify have to agree that their family will support them

Speaker:

the entire time. So that means no social assistance. It's likely not even a working visa. You have

Speaker:

to have. at least economically stable relatives over here that will look after you for three

Speaker:

years and the premises after three years they're going to send you back. I don't... Average

Speaker:

Canadian can't afford a $500 emergency. Where the hell are people going to have the money

Speaker:

to support people like that? Come on. Yeah, and not only that, in three years, what are

Speaker:

we facing? We don't even know what Gaza will look like in three years. We don't know if

Speaker:

Israel will allow them to return. That part is just a farce to begin with. But Santiago,

Speaker:

1,000 people are allowed to escape. And we are, what, 130 days into this. Guess how many people

Speaker:

have qualified under that program? Did anyone? No. Not one. And there's a CBC story that I'll

Speaker:

link. And It talks about a family that was essentially wiped out while waiting for a response. There's

Speaker:

like a third step to the qualification process. My guess, my speculation is that's the security

Speaker:

clearance part and likely being held up by Israel, but I wouldn't put it past us to have just

Speaker:

made this entire visa program another one of your performative things that we're talking

Speaker:

about. where we said we would pull people out, we would do family reunification, and we never

Speaker:

had any intention of doing that at all. And there won't even be people left to bring over

Speaker:

on the list because there's nowhere left safe in Gaza. Have you seen the charts where it

Speaker:

shows, you know, population density in Gaza versus where the bombing in Gaza has happened?

Speaker:

When we talk about there's nowhere safe, it's there bombing everywhere where there's people.

Speaker:

Yeah, those two pictures are the same, and folks should take... time, if they haven't already,

Speaker:

to look up a map of the Gaza Strip and imagine that entire population is now into that bottom

Speaker:

southern corner, south of Chanyunis, and that's about 1.6 million people. The numbers are really

Speaker:

hard to define at this point, but you know, you've got definitely over a million people.

Speaker:

all displaced, most of them living on the streets are in tents, and now they're being treated

Speaker:

the same way in the North, where they're being told to evacuate, and there's absolutely no

Speaker:

work for them to go. And during this kind of movement from Khan Yunus, where a lot had settled,

Speaker:

to Ra'afah, was when Mansour Soumin was reported missing. Now if you, again, have been living

Speaker:

under a rock or something and haven't heard about Canadian-Palestinian journalist Mansour

Speaker:

Soumin, he was... reported to have been abducted by the IDF. None of that has been confirmed.

Speaker:

All that we do know is his family and his support team lost contact with him for about two weeks.

Speaker:

And the response here, Canada side, was immense. There was a petition that went out that quickly

Speaker:

gained lots of signatures and you even got the Prime Minister actually making a statement.

Speaker:

trying to express some bullshit concern. I don't know what. what happened, but we do know that

Speaker:

he is back on air. He is back reporting from a conunis in the Gaza Strip. And you can, I'll

Speaker:

link his IG, his Instagram account, so people can see for themselves. But I think that was

Speaker:

a relief for people. But it also again brings up the discussion how like no journalists are

Speaker:

safe. And the Canadian media here is doing such an abysmal job. Jesse

Speaker:

This man is not even pretending to be a journalist anymore. He had nothing to say about Selena

Speaker:

Robinson's anti-Palestinian racism, like, at all, even though that was the story in Canadian

Speaker:

media for the entire weekend. The only time he chimed in was, of course, to comment on

Speaker:

the awful vandalism that happened outside of her office and to label it as anti-Semitism.

Speaker:

So... The fact that this guy still has his platform is astonishing. I wonder what their subscription

Speaker:

list looks like now. Yeah, no, I mean, it's such a free fall. The way that Jesse Brown

Speaker:

has just completely fallen apart. And it's not even just like Israel Palestine stuff. He's

Speaker:

like talking about like, he's like defending AI porn and stuff, like making people's image

Speaker:

and like, what the hell? Like this guy completely lost it. What the hell is wrong with him? Speaking

Speaker:

of people who lost their way, Joe Roberts is no longer with J-Space. We can speculate all

Speaker:

we want. We're going to tell ourselves that they finally rid themselves of that Zionist.

Speaker:

Fun fact, the very next day, or at least like maybe two days, but very soon after they announce

Speaker:

his departure. they release a statement that Canada should reinstate funding to UNRWA. So

Speaker:

I wonder if maybe Joe was holding that statement back, because as we know, Zionists don't actually

Speaker:

make up the majority of the Jewish population, and the views that they hold are not inherently

Speaker:

Jewish. And so that was nice to see coming out of J-Space to take that stand, that had gone

Speaker:

too far. But, yeah, it's... Unfortunately, there's no shortage of figures on the left. All of

Speaker:

these feel like they should be in quotations that are really feeding into the narratives

Speaker:

that we try so hard to tear down. And so I guess that's why we have such gripes with them. It

Speaker:

feels like we're having to undo their handiwork all the time or maybe vice versa. Yeah, no,

Speaker:

I mean, it's. It's it's. Sorry, I don't even know where to go with this because it's so...

Speaker:

Like it's comical, but it also shows like, you know, don't put anyone on a pedestal. Least

Speaker:

of us don't put us on a pedestal, you know? Like don't put... No, nobody, no one figure

Speaker:

represents the left and we're all, you know, people that need to be held accountable. Those

Speaker:

of us who are searching for platforms, those of us who are trying to like speak. We all

Speaker:

need to be held accountable, you know? Like, I sure hope that like, if I ever said something

Speaker:

that fucking absurd, that people would be holding me accountable, and I hope that I would be,

Speaker:

you know, mature enough to listen. But yeah, it's, there are no heroes, you know? This is

Speaker:

about all of us. It's not about any one of us. And... So the Jesse Rob, the Jesse Browns and

Speaker:

the Joe Roberts and everyone like, you know, it's, heed the warning signs, right? Yeah,

Speaker:

clearly there's no heroes because I'm a little bit older. I feel like I grew up surrounded

Speaker:

by music that was a little bit revolutionary. I'm not gonna start naming artists, but I just

Speaker:

kind of grew up with the impression that musicians often use their music for a cause. Should and

Speaker:

perhaps that's just my whole mentality that anybody with a platform should use it in particularly

Speaker:

times like this

Speaker:

Again we've talked about how I don't really possess a filter So I perhaps can never maybe

Speaker:

that's why I never apply one But I'm kind of talking about the entertainment industry and

Speaker:

the Grammys just happened I didn't watch them. I don't watch those things generally, but you

Speaker:

know, you can't help but get a summary of events through social media. And I guess I expected

Speaker:

in this moment somebody to get up or multiple people to try to press this issue to perhaps

Speaker:

be dressed in black, red, white, and green. Anything to try to draw attention to use. this

Speaker:

kind of huge platform. And only Annie Lennox did, right? There was an immemorial portion

Speaker:

that they get through and she did, she held up her fist and she made comments there. And

Speaker:

that was it. And it was hosted by a South African. So my disappointment in Trevor Noah extends

Speaker:

far beyond the Grammys. I mean, I once heard him tell a joke about... South African miners

Speaker:

just being completely slaughtered by police. And it was a real kind of class war joke that

Speaker:

rubbed me the wrong way. So I've not liked him for since I heard that. But it does disappoint

Speaker:

me because he has been on the record for Palestine as have other artists. But some of them are

Speaker:

just so silent now. And shit like Roger Waters just got dropped from his label. That man has

Speaker:

been part of the BDS movement for Decades he has been so outspoken his concert backgrounds

Speaker:

are often a political message mostly about Palestine and Now they decide to drop them. I mean, I

Speaker:

don't know like you said there are no heroes and I shouldn't expect it But I think I did

Speaker:

at least out of musicians But as a musician Can you agree with me here? Do you? You just

Speaker:

think it's the same old, same old, that particular industry, like every other industry. Just,

Speaker:

there's no space for it. And to be fair, it's not all musicians, right? It's the ones that

Speaker:

get platforms like the Grammys, right? Um, because, you know, I mean, I might use the example of

Speaker:

Low-Key, you know, one of my favorite rappers. And I discovered him through his music, not

Speaker:

through his commentary, but he hasn't taken a day off. Since then, I'm not sure he's sleeping.

Speaker:

No, like he's been a relentless warrior for the cause, right? So, you know, shout out again,

Speaker:

as always, to Loki. You know, people like Macklemore put out a statement. Shout out to him, you

Speaker:

know, I wasn't surprised by that. People are surprised that he's always spoken about these

Speaker:

things. But I guess there are some people that were there that I expect him maybe do more.

Speaker:

Killer Mike's an example. You know, Killer Mike, he does speak out for a lot of things, but

Speaker:

you know, he I don't even know who won Grammys. I don't even know anything about who was there.

Speaker:

I just know I saw some clips of Killer Mike there, so and I didn't hear about him speaking,

Speaker:

so um but yeah, I mean history also hasn't been kind to a lot of artists who have spoken out,

Speaker:

right? Sinead O'Connor comes to mind as someone who had it pretty rough for things that we

Speaker:

all now know. She was right about her. Well, Annie Lennox was actually singing one of her

Speaker:

songs during the memoriam because Sinead O'Connor passed away this year. So it's funny that you

Speaker:

had tied her to that. And even currently, you know, kind of like Hollywood related, but...

Speaker:

Susan Sarandon, she was dropped by her agency for showing up at Palestinian solidarity rallies.

Speaker:

There's the Scream franchise blew up, the young actress there, Melissa Barbera, she was openly

Speaker:

fired for her views on Palestine. And there's a great article of her kind of pushing back

Speaker:

on that in the Rolling Stone, being vindicated of sorts. But it's the same pressures that

Speaker:

exist in the academia. and the political world. So I think that's what made the Selena Robinson

Speaker:

case important for the points that we discussed already at the beginning of the episode. But

Speaker:

also, you know, it's one of the first times that we've seen somebody be removed from an

Speaker:

important position for being a Zionist. And I think, like, there's some people in my mentions

Speaker:

sometimes trying to... force me to make space for Zionism, as though I should tolerate Zionism,

Speaker:

and I don't, just for the record, I don't think it's a legitimate ideology. I think it's harmful.

Speaker:

I'm not talking about whether or not they should be able to say what they need to say. I just

Speaker:

think it shouldn't exist. There shouldn't be political systems based on Zionism. So it's

Speaker:

just, it feels like that's part of the tide turning. Although the retributions against

Speaker:

pro-Palestinian activists has surely not ended, the fact that pressure finally paid off against

Speaker:

the impunity for which Zionists had been operating, as though they could just hold these positions

Speaker:

that erase Palestinians in their mind and spout them and still hold a job in elected office.

Speaker:

And that's no longer the case. So May all the Zionists elected officials out there know that

Speaker:

we're coming for them. But to be clear, you can be a Zionist and be in political office.

Speaker:

You just can't be openly racist and a Zionist. And, you know, I disagree. I think in a Canadian

Speaker:

office, there shouldn't be a politician that believes one set of people are deserving of

Speaker:

an exclusive homeland. Sorry, let me be clear. I I don't think that they should be. I mean

Speaker:

more that like clearly they're allowed to, like clearly they get space to as long as they don't,

Speaker:

you know, as long as they're slick about it, right? As long as they hide these views. Yes,

Speaker:

so their policies will still reflect a Zionist ideology, but don't you dare spout that shit

Speaker:

in a Zionist lobby webinar that's going to be posted. online afterwards. So you'll have to

Speaker:

at least couch your language or be a little bit more careful. But the fact that it's just

Speaker:

like not legitimate anymore. And it had been for so long, like people have been saying this

Speaker:

nonsense for a long time, they still say it. But now we have an example of where we held

Speaker:

them accountable and we drew a line. So I hope that's a trend.

Speaker:

over until the genocide ends, until there's a free Palestine, like... We need to keep putting

Speaker:

that pressure. We need to keep fighting. We need to keep putting papers of tape and chalk

Speaker:

and much more than that on all the politicians' office. And people like Melanie Jolie shouldn't

Speaker:

get a peaceful night's sleep because I can tell you that the children of Gaza are not getting

Speaker:

a peaceful night's sleep with the bombs dropping over their head. So I see no reason why Melanie

Speaker:

Jolie should herself, so. Yeah, we need to keep at it and not expect, and also, like, I think

Speaker:

if there's a theme from all of this, it's not expecting those in power to act in the interests

Speaker:

of anyone other than those in power because they've shown you time and again what this

Speaker:

is. They have their class consciousness. They know who they are. And we know who we are,

Speaker:

you know. Don't confuse them as anything but. I don't know. That is a wrap on another episode

Speaker:

of Blueprints of Disruption. Thank you for joining us. Also, a very big thank you to the producer

Speaker:

of our show, Santiago Halu-Quintero. Blueprints of Disruption is an independent production

Speaker:

operated cooperatively. You can follow us on Twitter at BPofDisruption. If you'd like to

Speaker:

help us continue disrupting the status quo, please share our content. And if you have the

Speaker:

means, consider becoming a patron. Not only does our support come from the progressive

Speaker:

community, so does our content. So reach out to us and let us know what or who we should

Speaker:

be amplifying. So until next time, keep disrupting.