Trevor:

Hello, dear listener.

Trevor:

Episode 437 of the Iron Fist and the Velvet Glove podcast, where we talk about

Trevor:

news and politics and sex and religion.

Trevor:

I'm Trevor.

Trevor:

On the screen there, the slumlord of regional Queensland, Scott, how are you?

Trevor:

Good thanks, Trevor.

Trevor:

Yourself?

Trevor:

I'm well.

Trevor:

And Joe, the tech guy, how are you?

Joe:

Good, Neil.

Trevor:

Joe, you've got a task first up, is to explain what happened with that,

Trevor:

uh, whole incident on the internet, but we'll get to that in a moment.

Trevor:

If you're in the chat room, say hello, um, I've got the chat up

Trevor:

on my screen so I can see that.

Trevor:

Yes, well, of course we're going to talk about Biden pulling out of the race, and

Trevor:

I've got various clips by various just crazy Americans, so, you know, Scott,

Trevor:

there's not a lot happening in local.

Trevor:

Australian politics is there.

Trevor:

So I know we could be accused of just running a pretty USA centric podcast

Trevor:

episode on this occasion, but there's just not much really happening.

Scott:

Not a hell of a lot's happening, no.

Trevor:

No, so it's not every day that a sitting president pulls out

Trevor:

of the race, right at the death.

Trevor:

So, um.

Trevor:

You did see that meme I sent you?

Trevor:

Which one was that, Joe?

Joe:

Nation with increasingly limited access to birth control,

Joe:

thanks man for pulling you out.

Trevor:

Yeah, I did say yes.

Trevor:

Thank you for that, Joe.

Trevor:

Um, so, before we get into the, that sort of stuff, um, Joe,

Trevor:

CloudStrike, what happened?

Trevor:

CloudStrike.

Trevor:

Yeah, what happened?

Joe:

Uh, alright, so it's an advanced antivirus program.

Joe:

It's a corporate antivirus program.

Joe:

Amongst other things.

Joe:

And, um, it phones home for updates and it also reports everything that's going

Joe:

on on your computer so that, uh, corporate IT can have an idea of dodgy behavior,

Joe:

um, going around the corporation.

Joe:

Uh, because it's an antivirus program and it's looking for

Joe:

abnormal behavior, it hooks very deeply into the operating system.

Trevor:

It's got a lot of permissions.

Joe:

It's got a lot of permissions.

Joe:

It, it's deep, deep inside, and, and it's loaded immediately upon Boot up.

Scott:

Mm-Hmm,

Scott:

. Joe: So what happened was, uh, an update was pushed out by CrowdStrike.

Scott:

To the Falcon Sensor, and it looks like it was a corrupt file, which when it loaded

Scott:

up, um, caused the program to crash, but that took down the whole operating system,

Scott:

uh, and because it's an initial, uh, loaded program, even though they rolled

Scott:

back, once they figured out what was going on, they rolled back, uh, the software

Scott:

update, or sorry, the file update, Um, the affected computers couldn't actually

Scott:

be booted up long enough to contact the internet to download the new file.

Scott:

And even worse, if you had an encrypted hard drive, you couldn't boot into

Scott:

recovery mode to delete the dodgy file to get it back up and running.

Scott:

So you have to then find your secret key.

Scott:

For each individual computer, go around each individual computer in turn, boot

Scott:

them into save mode with the recovery key and then roll back the software update.

Trevor:

So some organizations with literally thousands of computers had to

Trevor:

physically manually reboot and somebody stand there and catch it at a stage and

Trevor:

get it, get that initial thing out of there so it could then boot up properly.

Joe:

So the real big question is, yeah, um.

Joe:

Most corporations have learned through painful experience that you don't roll out

Joe:

software updates as soon as they come out.

Joe:

You test them on a limited subset of computers.

Joe:

Uh, and now obviously, antivirus, you want the latest updates as

Joe:

soon as possible because bad people out there are doing bad things.

Joe:

And, uh, People just, a crowd striker running on 60 percent of the Fortune

Joe:

500, Fortune 1000 enterprises, so they've captured a large section

Joe:

of the market, uh, and this was their way of doing business.

Scott:

Mm.

Joe:

And um, yeah, the question is why was this out of date update

Joe:

pushed out on a Thursday night and why hadn't it been properly tested?

Joe:

Mm.

Joe:

Because the fact that it brought down so many computers so quickly means

Joe:

that it hadn't been adequately tested.

Trevor:

Interesting.

Trevor:

Showing how vulnerable our society is Oh, absolutely.

Trevor:

Is something as simple as that.

Trevor:

Whereas things crashing down,

Joe:

it only affected windows.

Joe:

Um, there was a kind of.

Joe:

Schadenfreude from people who run Linux and Macs, but really no

Joe:

big crowing about it, um, because realistically, Could it happen to them?

Joe:

Any operating system can be affected, and again, the same with the

Joe:

virus, antivirus, um, providers.

Joe:

Um, it's easy enough to say, oh, it had never happened to us, but, you know,

Joe:

until you're absolutely sure that your processes are up to spec, it's And in the

Joe:

security field, a lot of people have been going, yeah, people test for compliance

Joe:

rather than testing for or planning for, um, what happens when it all goes wrong.

Trevor:

I was listening to this podcast with this guy, he was an IT guy.

Trevor:

It was a podcast about something completely different, a bit like this one,

Trevor:

where the guy happens to be an IT guy.

Trevor:

And he was saying that they try and encourage all of their staff

Trevor:

to switch off their computers when they leave at the end of the day.

Trevor:

And one of the ideas is that if something like this happens at midnight, then,

Trevor:

um, you could, you don't have to fix it.

Trevor:

Well, you sort of cut it off at the pass and in the, in the morning, quickly

Trevor:

make sure people don't reboot their computers until the danger has passed.

Trevor:

Is that good practice, Joe?

Trevor:

Turn your computer off?

Joe:

I mean, saving electricity for a start, um, I mean, hopefully

Joe:

your IT is better than just relying on updates overnight.

Joe:

It looks like Trevor's lost his audio again.

Joe:

It does.

Scott:

Yeah, I was wondering what happened with them.

Joe:

Yeah, um.

Joe:

There was a number of comments that were saying things like, well, of

Joe:

course, you know, the best form of antivirus is for you not to be online.

Joe:

So, uh, obviously they fulfilled that purpose.

Joe:

You can't get a virus if you're not online to get it.

Scott:

Very true.

Scott:

Yeah.

Joe:

Um, I, I think a lot of people, I mean, obviously, um, CrowdStrike

Joe:

are going to get absolutely hammered by their customers.

Joe:

Just for the cost of rebuilding all these computers or fixing all these computers.

Joe:

Yeah, think of the overtime bill, uh, and the loss of business

Joe:

for a lot of, um, customers.

Joe:

Uh, we were lucky because we were going into Friday afternoon.

Joe:

Um, I think the US who were just coming into Friday morning would

Joe:

have had a full day of outage.

Joe:

And therefore a much bigger impact for them.

Joe:

No, we can't hear

Scott:

you.

Joe:

Hang on, you're on mute.

Trevor:

Speaking of crazy tech things, I just don't know why this thing does

Trevor:

it when in this restream podcast.

Trevor:

Um, anyway, hopefully it's only the one time.

Trevor:

There's another mystery, internet mystery.

Trevor:

Right.

Trevor:

Okay.

Trevor:

Was that everything on the cloud strike, uh, that would be relevant?

Trevor:

Um,

Joe:

that was one other thing.

Joe:

I'm just trying to, you'd mentioned something, but I can't

Joe:

remember off the top of my head.

Trevor:

Okay.

Trevor:

Might come back to Ah, Scott.

Trevor:

The whole, um, Joe Biden pulling out of the race, and I

Scott:

think he had to do it.

Trevor:

Yes.

Trevor:

And we were sort of arguing before we came to Yeah, not arguing, but, um,

Trevor:

I was saying, like, it just doesn't matter if Kamala Harris gets in.

Trevor:

Um, she'll just continue what Joe Biden would have done.

Trevor:

And Trump is going to continue a lot of the same things.

Trevor:

Does it really make any difference?

Scott:

It does because, you know, Trump is going to turn his back on

Scott:

world trade and everything else.

Scott:

Now, I know you've got some issues with that, but, um,

Scott:

the worldwide Biden's already

Trevor:

doing that.

Trevor:

Kamala Harris will do that when it comes to China and chips.

Scott:

With China and chips and everything else, they're doing that.

Scott:

They've got their reasons for that.

Scott:

I don't actually subscribe to their reasons, but they do

Scott:

have their reasons for that.

Scott:

So,

Trevor:

there's no difference there, yeah?

Scott:

No, okay, that's one thing that there's no difference there.

Scott:

Yeah, there would be a hell of a difference for bodily

Scott:

autonomy in the United States.

Scott:

If you actually had a situation that Trump could get another term in, and if

Scott:

he could actually do what Project 2025 actually calls for, then you'd end up

Scott:

with a, you'd end up with a blanket ban on abortion across the whole country,

Scott:

which would then result in people going south of the border or north of

Scott:

the border to have a termination done.

Scott:

Isn't that a stylish thing?

Scott:

It's a state issue now, however, the Yanks have actually talked about, there

Scott:

have been some lunatic, on the lunatic right, that have actually talked about

Scott:

having a national ban on abortions.

Scott:

They're actually, they're actually talking about having a law in the federal, in

Scott:

the federal arena that would actually supersede anything the states would have.

Joe:

If the Supreme Court could rule that a fetus was a living human being.

Joe:

They would.

Joe:

No, but, so if a case made it as far as the Supreme Court, and the Supreme Court

Joe:

ruled that a fetus was a human being, then federal laws, state laws against murder.

Joe:

Automatically kick in.

Scott:

Exactly.

Trevor:

Okay.

Trevor:

I'll grant you, there may be some minor differences on.

Trevor:

I don't

Scott:

think they're minor differences.

Scott:

I think they're major

Trevor:

differences.

Trevor:

Effectively they're minor because even if.

Scott:

I wouldn't call that minor.

Scott:

That is a, that is, that is something that you cannot

Scott:

possibly call a minor difference.

Scott:

It is a major difference.

Scott:

These are bedroom issues.

Scott:

This is cultural stuff.

Scott:

It's a, it's a bedroom issue.

Scott:

However, it is actually being done now.

Scott:

Roe v.

Scott:

Wade is now on the Ash Heap of history.

Scott:

Yes.

Scott:

And that, that is ridiculous because you've got six or seven states in the US

Scott:

that have actually had their trigger laws have now kicked in and they've actually

Scott:

gone to this ridiculous stage saying you can't abort if it's after five weeks.

Scott:

And then, if you got that, Most women don't even know they're knocked up until

Scott:

8 or 12 weeks or something like that.

Scott:

So it's too late for them to get a legal abortion, so they're going to cross

Scott:

the border over into the California.

Scott:

You've had, you've had some of those right wing nutjob AGs in those southern states

Scott:

actually speaking out loud, saying the quiet bit out loud, and they're saying

Scott:

that they're going to prosecute women that leave the state to have a termination.

Scott:

Here's what I'm

Trevor:

saying.

Trevor:

Here's what I'm saying.

Trevor:

There's going to be no difference is say, Kamala Harris gets in.

Trevor:

Roe v.

Trevor:

Wade's there.

Trevor:

There's going to be states, redneck states, that are maintaining

Trevor:

their abortion um, bans.

Trevor:

And, and she won't be able to do anything about it,

Scott:

really.

Scott:

Well, I agree that it's going to be pretty hard for her to do something

Scott:

about it unless she's got, unless she's got congressional support.

Scott:

So, for starters,

Trevor:

she's going to have to get a majority of the Congress.

Scott:

Yeah.

Trevor:

And, then, pass a federal law.

Trevor:

Which will then be challenged in courts that are dominated by

Trevor:

Republican appointees who are not going to like the federal law and are

Trevor:

going to be upholding states rights.

Trevor:

AOC is

Joe:

trying to impeach two of the Supreme Court justices.

Trevor:

What's that, Joe?

Trevor:

Sorry.

Trevor:

AOC is trying

Joe:

to impeach two of the Supreme Court justices.

Trevor:

Yeah.

Joe:

So if they go Or, or Big Ifs.

Joe:

No, no, but yeah, yours were

Trevor:

Big Ifs as well.

Trevor:

So Alison in the chat room went, Trevor, exclamation mark, exclamation mark.

Trevor:

And I don't blame her.

Trevor:

I'm not saying, I'm not saying that bedroom issues aren't a big deal.

Trevor:

I'm saying the difference that will effectively happen.

Trevor:

isn't going to happen.

Scott:

But the abortion rock show

Trevor:

is going to continue exactly the same way it has and Kamala Harris

Trevor:

won't be able to do anything about it.

Trevor:

That's my point is that there's no effective difference is going

Trevor:

to result from her election.

Trevor:

Even though, yes, they want to fix that issue, but it just won't happen.

Joe:

Well, but, but even if they, she can't make it any better, at least she

Joe:

can stop it getting worse, which is the suspicion that will happen under Trump.

Trevor:

Well, if every state becomes just more and more redneck,

Trevor:

then what can she do about it?

Scott:

Well, I think she could actually try, she could actually try and

Scott:

have a federal law that would get.

Scott:

And

Trevor:

try and run

Scott:

it through this Supreme Court.

Scott:

Yeah, okay, you've got that, but you know, um, that Supreme Court is only a decree.

Scott:

So I guarantee there'll be a difference.

Scott:

If

Joe:

the justices die, she gets to appoint more Supreme Court justices.

Scott:

Well, she gets to nominate them.

Scott:

Well, you know what, they won't let her.

Trevor:

The Republicans won't, they will stall.

Trevor:

Supreme Court appointment

Joe:

for four years.

Joe:

But hang on.

Joe:

Don't forget the Supreme Court has ruled that she can, within her remit as

Joe:

president, do anything that a president can do with no criminal charges.

Joe:

She could assassinate some of them.

Joe:

She could assassinate whoever she wants.

Joe:

Like,

Trevor:

okay.

Trevor:

So there's going to be an argument over abortion, but it's going to be a, a,

Trevor:

um, They're just an argument that's not going to make any effective change.

Trevor:

That's, that's what I'm saying.

Trevor:

What else is going to be different?

Trevor:

We've also got

Scott:

the other thing too about Supreme Court justice that waxes

Scott:

lyrically and all that sort of stuff.

Scott:

And he says, well, maybe we should, maybe we should revisit the gay marriage thing.

Trevor:

Yes.

Scott:

You know, and that is something that I honestly believe

Scott:

they could actually take off if they got their opportunity to.

Trevor:

And if it rolls off to the Supreme Court and the Supreme

Trevor:

Court makes that decision again.

Trevor:

Yeah.

Trevor:

She might never do anything about it.

Scott:

Well, she could actually, she could actually have some sort

Scott:

of marriage law act in the, in the federal, federal government.

Trevor:

Which will then roll through the courts, end up at the Supreme

Trevor:

Court and be told, for some, whatever crazy reason, you can't do it.

Scott:

Anyway, I just think that, um, there are people like

Scott:

yourself that are making light of Trump possibly coming back.

Trevor:

No, I'm not making light of it.

Scott:

Well, I think you are, because you, you're actually quite

Scott:

excited about AUKUS being knocked on the head, which I agree with.

Scott:

But that's a big issue.

Scott:

AUKUS is a big issue and it should be knocked on the head.

Scott:

However, there are other things going along there that would, that would

Scott:

make the American people suffer more under a Trump presidency than they

Scott:

would under a Harris presidency.

Trevor:

Like what?

Trevor:

Like, I'm not excited by a Trump presidency.

Trevor:

Good lord,

Scott:

I think you are.

Trevor:

Only from the point of view that I think it will most likely lead to Aukus

Trevor:

being officially cancelled before it's eventually cancelled in 10 years time.

Trevor:

That doesn't make me excited about or wanting Trump, but

Trevor:

we're just kidding ourselves.

Trevor:

This is so performative.

Trevor:

Where the way that the U.

Trevor:

S.

Trevor:

conducts itself in foreign relations and military affairs and also just its own

Trevor:

people, um, it's still going to continue.

Joe:

They're

Trevor:

singing from the same song sheet, these people.

Joe:

Trump handed Afghanistan back to the Taliban, he was quite happy about that.

Trevor:

Well hang on, wasn't it Biden who pulled out of Afghanistan?

Trevor:

No.

Trevor:

Didn't they criticise Biden for

Joe:

doing it too quickly?

Scott:

They did.

Scott:

But, you know, Trump was the one that started it.

Scott:

But Trump had signed

Joe:

the agreement with the Taliban and Trump had said, we're pulling

Joe:

these troops out by this date.

Joe:

So Biden had to do that.

Joe:

Right.

Trevor:

So, what are you saying?

Joe:

So what I'm saying is You know, uh, there is a difference

Joe:

between them and, um, Well, they

Trevor:

both, I mean, if Biden wanted to, he could have said, I've changed

Trevor:

my mind, we're starting in Afghanistan.

Trevor:

They both wanted to at that point.

Joe:

I think by that time, um, if they changed their mind, the

Joe:

infrastructure wasn't in place.

Joe:

They'd pulled back enough of the infrastructure to make it

Joe:

very difficult for them to stay.

Scott:

There'll be one difference.

Scott:

I think the Taliban was already moving across the country by

Scott:

the time that In foreign policy,

Trevor:

there will be a difference.

Trevor:

Trump will pull out of assisting The Paris Accord.

Trevor:

Will pull out of assisting Ukraine.

Trevor:

Yes.

Trevor:

So Ukraine will be forced to enter into a negotiated peace with Russia.

Joe:

Another state like Belarus.

Joe:

So,

Trevor:

um, so that would be one difference in foreign policy,

Joe:

but

Trevor:

you know, the, what's going on in Gaza, the support of

Trevor:

Israel and what's going on there.

Trevor:

The expansion of NATO into ENC China if it can.

Joe:

No, no, no.

Joe:

He's not za that at all.

Joe:

He doesn't want na, he doesn't know nato.

Scott:

Actually, you might be

Joe:

right

Scott:

there.

Scott:

Well, he's

Trevor:

actually, yes, he might.

Trevor:

He might actually tear that back.

Trevor:

You're quite right.

Trevor:

He

Scott:

said to NATO members and unless they, unless they pay 2% of their GDPs

Scott:

in the defense that he's, then I think he said, well, I would encourage the Russians

Scott:

to do whatever the hell they wanted to.

Trevor:

You know what we've just decided amongst us.

Trevor:

He's going to probably cause a peace in the Ukraine and pull NATO back from China.

Trevor:

Maybe I am starting to get excited.

Scott:

It's not peace in the Ukraine at all.

Scott:

It would be a bloody disaster.

Scott:

More

Trevor:

of a disaster than what's happening now?

Scott:

If they were forced to negotiate with that bastard Putin, all he would

Scott:

do is slice up the country bit by bit.

Scott:

And he'd come, he'd go back in, he'd go across beyond his border, lick his

Scott:

wounds, rebuild his troops, go back in for another bite, until the whole bloody

Scott:

country was absorbed as part of Russia.

Trevor:

More of a disaster than what's happening now.

Scott:

Um, yeah.

Scott:

In terms of lives being lost, no, there would be less lives being lost, however.

Scott:

It's not, you can't just roll your eyes and say that's not a bad idea.

Scott:

It's one of those things, it's something that you cannot just say.

Scott:

Yeah,

Joe:

if only the Allies during the 1940s had just rolled over when

Joe:

Hitler wanted the whole of Europe.

Joe:

You know, uh, and less lives would have been lost.

Joe:

Do

Trevor:

you reckon the surviving Ukrainians agree with me or you?

Joe:

I would say that a lot of the surviving Ukrainians want Russia out.

Joe:

They don't like life under Russian rule.

Joe:

Do

Trevor:

you reckon a fair number of them would agree with me?

Trevor:

Possibly.

Scott:

A small

Trevor:

number would.

Scott:

Yeah.

Trevor:

What if it is,

Scott:

what if it is a

Trevor:

majority of the Ukrainians agree with me?

Trevor:

If it's a

Scott:

majority of Ukrainians agree with you, then that would be fine,

Scott:

it would show, it would mark you out.

Scott:

They're not

Trevor:

allowed to vote.

Trevor:

He's cancelled the election.

Trevor:

It says he can't run one.

Scott:

Because he's being invaded by a foreign country.

Scott:

Yeah.

Scott:

I know the Russians like It's because his democracy

Trevor:

is under threat.

Trevor:

I

Scott:

mean, this is the thing, it might well be the

Trevor:

case, if he had an election, everyone would boot him out

Trevor:

because they've had enough of it.

Trevor:

They want their remaining men.

Trevor:

Uh, to live.

Scott:

Potentially, and if that is the result of the Ukrainian

Scott:

election, you have to stand by it.

Trevor:

We won't know, you won't hold one.

Scott:

Well, we'll have to wait and see.

Joe:

I know people who definitely would rather be at war than be under Putin.

Trevor:

I'm sure there would be people with the opposite view.

Trevor:

We just have no idea of Of the percentages or whatever.

Trevor:

Yeah,

Joe:

I look in the UK.

Joe:

Anyway, who cares

Trevor:

what people think.

Trevor:

Democracies are, get things wrong anyways.

Trevor:

Exactly.

Scott:

I cannot believe you're turning your back on democracy.

Scott:

And you know,

Joe:

um, President for life, Trump.

Joe:

He's been eyeing up Mugabe's, uh, reign of power.

Joe:

Has

Trevor:

he been, has he been applauding Mugabe, has he?

Joe:

No, he hasn't, but I'm sure he would.

Joe:

If you'd ever heard of Mugabe, I'm sure he'd be, you know, he's a strong man.

Joe:

Yeah,

Trevor:

yeah.

Trevor:

Do

Joe:

you honestly think if Trump gets into power, he will

Joe:

leave at the end of four years?

Trevor:

Uh, uh, I have n no, no.

Trevor:

I dunno what he would do.

Trevor:

I have, I have no idea.

Trevor:

I think wanna, probably not.

Trevor:

I, I think he would, I think he would probably, um, try and install his son

Trevor:

or daughter or something like that.

Trevor:

So I think he'd try and.

Trevor:

I

Joe:

mean, the way he was cozying up to Kim, I think he would very much like the

Joe:

USA to be his own private North Korea.

Scott:

Yeah.

Scott:

And that really wouldn't surprise me because, you know, North Korea has locked

Scott:

itself off from the rest of the planet.

Trevor:

Quite possible.

Trevor:

Quite possible.

Scott:

I just think he's an idiot.

Scott:

That's all.

Scott:

And I, I cannot believe that anyone would be actually applauding

Scott:

him coming back to office.

Trevor:

Yeah.

Trevor:

Well, it looks like a majority of Americans are.

Scott:

Well, that's very true, and I just don't understand

Joe:

it.

Joe:

No, I don't think it's going to be a majority of Americans.

Joe:

It never has been

Trevor:

a majority of Americans.

Trevor:

And a majority of the, uh, what's it called?

Joe:

The, uh, Electoral Council?

Joe:

No.

Trevor:

Yeah.

Trevor:

The Electoral College.

Trevor:

The Electoral College, yes.

Trevor:

Looks like enough of them will.

Trevor:

Which is close enough.

Trevor:

It's huge numbers anyway.

Trevor:

But, um, yeah, John Simmons is in the chat room.

Trevor:

He's 30 minutes behind catching up.

Trevor:

Right.

Scott:

He's not going to catch up that conversation, is he?

Trevor:

Wow.

Trevor:

That was a good old fashioned argument there.

Trevor:

Yeah.

Trevor:

Let's have some more.

Trevor:

Because

Scott:

you're wrong.

Scott:

What part am I wrong again?

Scott:

You're wrong about the United States.

Scott:

You're wrong about the United

Trevor:

States.

Trevor:

Was

Scott:

I wrong?

Scott:

You honestly believe that it doesn't really matter which side wins.

Joe:

Were you here for the full 10 minute argument?

Trevor:

Yeah, yeah, yeah, that's true.

Trevor:

I think, for the most part, it doesn't matter.

Trevor:

I think that the, the rock show will continue pretty much as it

Trevor:

has, except for the Ukraine, and probably defunding of NATO, keeping

Trevor:

them out of threatening China.

Trevor:

But, um,

Scott:

otherwise I don't think, I don't think The sorts

Trevor:

of things that affect most people Other than some culture war issues,

Trevor:

which are very big issues, I think Kamala

Joe:

Harris will be the best.

Joe:

Right-wing government go, um, president they've had since, um, Obama.

Joe:

She, she will be the what, the best right-wing president

Joe:

they'll have had since Obama.

Joe:

Right.

Trevor:

So you're agreeing with me in the sense that, that the economy

Trevor:

and the running of the economy.

Trevor:

Well,

Joe:

the choice is right or far right.

Joe:

There is no left wing in American politics.

Trevor:

An extractive capitalism that favours the 1 percent run by Donald Trump,

Trevor:

or the same thing run by Kamala Harris?

Joe:

Well, a slightly less bad.

Joe:

There is a difference.

Joe:

It's not great.

Trevor:

Yeah.

Trevor:

You know, arguably, I was listening to something about, um, It was the

Trevor:

donors pulling out of funding for the Democrats that was one of the driving

Trevor:

forces for them getting onto Biden and saying, you've got to pull out.

Trevor:

So.

Joe:

Trump in, in the one paragraph going on about how great Elon Musk was and

Joe:

how we ought to make life easy for Elon Musk and the next breath saying he gives

Joe:

me 45 million a month, was it, for some stupid amount of money into his super PAC?

Joe:

Right.

Joe:

Literally in the same paragraph, he was saying, He's a great guy,

Joe:

and by the way, he's a big donor.

Joe:

And he's a big donor of mine.

Scott:

Yeah, which is just crazy, because it was only 10 minutes earlier

Scott:

that he was blasting electric vehicles.

Scott:

Yeah,

Joe:

yeah.

Joe:

And you know, he was there to drain the swamp, remember?

Trevor:

Yeah.

Trevor:

Yeah.

Trevor:

Well.

Trevor:

Anyway, I like what, uh, Caitlin Johnston had to say, basically, that the rock

Trevor:

show's gonna be run the same way.

Trevor:

She put it this way, Every few years the U.

Trevor:

S.

Trevor:

Empire has this weird little festival where it pretends the government

Trevor:

is changing hands and will now begin operating in a way that is

Trevor:

meaningful, meaningfully different from the way it was operating before.

Trevor:

And she says, The elections themselves are a performative ritual put on to

Trevor:

help people feel good about themselves.

Trevor:

Like a religious sacrament performed by a priest.

Trevor:

You guys disagree, but that's good.

Trevor:

Yeah.

Trevor:

Ah, anyway, we can't be sure.

Trevor:

I think

Scott:

that Caitlin Johnson probably lives in California or somewhere like that.

Scott:

She lives in Melbourne.

Scott:

She lives in Melbourne.

Scott:

Does she?

Scott:

Okay.

Scott:

Well, she, she doesn't have to worry about the sort of nonsense that is

Scott:

being considered by the Supreme Court.

Scott:

She doesn't have to worry about paying a fortune for her drugs or anything else.

Scott:

You know, it's crazy that, um, the Yanks do not have, um,

Scott:

insulin at an affordable price.

Scott:

And what did

Trevor:

Biden do about

Scott:

that?

Scott:

Well, he did actually lower the price of insulin.

Trevor:

Right.

Trevor:

Okay, so they do have insulin at a good price.

Scott:

It's a better price.

Scott:

It's not as cheap as it is in Australia, but it is a better price than what it was.

Scott:

Right.

Scott:

See, it's utterly crazy that, uh, anyway, we can talk about the American

Scott:

healthcare system if you wanted to, but, um, it's one of those things.

Scott:

I just don't understand why the Yanks have got this, look at

Scott:

me, I pay for my own healthcare.

Scott:

Well, big deal, you know, you're a fucking idiot.

Trevor:

Yeah, well, attaching it to, as part of your work package, remuneration

Trevor:

package is a disastrous idea, so, yeah.

Trevor:

Anyway.

Trevor:

Will Kamala Harris get the nod?

Trevor:

Uh, there'll be a Democratic National Convention.

Trevor:

Yeah, what's your theory on that one, Scott?

Scott:

Uh, well, I mean, I think that, I think that she probably will

Scott:

get the nod because Biden is, Biden's delegates and everything are there.

Scott:

They're probably going to be more inclined to actually vote the way he wants them to.

Scott:

So he wants them to vote for Kamala Harris.

Joe:

Uh, my feeling is she's a black woman.

Joe:

Is she gonna get the support of America?

Joe:

I mean, you're gonna get the misogynistic racists outta the woodworks anyway.

Joe:

Yeah, exactly.

Joe:

They'll be everywhere.

Joe:

Are you gonna get enough people who would support her or are they

Joe:

gonna be enough of the fence?

Trevor:

Voted.

Trevor:

They voted for Obama.

Trevor:

So the They did, but he was a man.

Trevor:

Yes.

Trevor:

So, yeah.

Scott:

But he might have been a man and everything else, but he was

Scott:

also a black man and he was a hell.

Scott:

Well, he was.

Scott:

No, he was.

Scott:

He was

Joe:

half a black man.

Scott:

Well, he was half a black man.

Scott:

She was, well, she was, um, half Indian, half, um, half Indian,

Scott:

half, um, Caribbean, almost slave.

Trevor:

Yeah.

Trevor:

Grant Clark says she's deeply unpopular.

Scott:

Oh, that's Landon Hardbottom.

Scott:

I know she's deeply unpopular because she was the AG of, um, she was

Scott:

the AG in California, wasn't she?

Scott:

She

Joe:

was a prosecutor in California.

Joe:

she's very conservative.

Joe:

Hmm.

Trevor:

Same.

Trevor:

Yeah.

Trevor:

Okay.

Trevor:

Um, what else have I got here?

Trevor:

Um, so yeah, we'll find out, Democratic National Convention on the 19th of August.

Trevor:

Uh, I read an article in the Courier Fail, which said one of the reasons why

Trevor:

it took so long to get Biden to quit.

Trevor:

Of course it seems it was his wife, and apparently she hates

Trevor:

Kamala Harris, because as part of a debate they were having in 2019.

Trevor:

Kamala Harris suggested Biden was a racist for opposing busing

Trevor:

used to desegregate schools.

Trevor:

So because Harris suggested Biden was a racist, um, Biden's wife, um,

Trevor:

has hated Kamala Harris ever since.

Trevor:

And one of the reasons why she resisted so long.

Trevor:

and encouraged her husband to keep going was because it was probably

Trevor:

likely that Harris would get the nod.

Trevor:

She really didn't want that.

Trevor:

So that is according to an article in the Courier Failed.

Trevor:

So take that with a grain of salt.

Trevor:

You know, this would have been, um, see, according to insiders,

Trevor:

which could, it could mean anybody.

Trevor:

Yeah.

Trevor:

Right.

Trevor:

Well, Trump announced a, um, a vice presidential running mate.

Trevor:

And, uh, just a reminder that the reason he had to pick a new VP is because his

Trevor:

own supporters tried to kill his last one.

Scott:

Well, he

Trevor:

was also

Joe:

a theocrat.

Trevor:

Yes.

Trevor:

So, um, this time we've got, uh, this guy, J.

Trevor:

D.

Trevor:

Vance.

Trevor:

Um, let's have a bit of a listen to him break things up with a bit of a clip here.

Vance:

I think in this movement of national conservatism, what we need more

Vance:

than inspiration, is we need wisdom.

Vance:

And there is a wisdom in what Richard Nixon said approximately 40, 50 years ago.

Vance:

He said, and I quote, the professors are the enemy.

Joe:

Cultural revolution.

Trevor:

What's that Joe?

Joe:

Cultural revolution.

Joe:

Yeah.

Trevor:

Yeah.

Joe:

Yeah, like the Chinese did, just take them out and kill them.

Trevor:

Yeah, won't even bother re educating them.

Joe:

Yeah.

Trevor:

Yeah.

Trevor:

Um, I did a quick Google search, uh, what did Nixon actually say?

Trevor:

Apparently this comes from tapes that were recovered.

Trevor:

Um, he said, um, never forget, he tells National Security Advisors

Trevor:

Henry Kissinger and Alexander Haig in a conversation, December 14th, 1972.

Trevor:

This is Nixon.

Trevor:

Never forget, the press is the enemy.

Trevor:

The press is the enemy.

Trevor:

The establishment is the enemy.

Trevor:

The professors are the enemy.

Trevor:

The professors are the enemy.

Trevor:

Write that on a blackboard a hundred times.

Trevor:

That's what Nixon said.

Trevor:

I don't know why Vance missed out on, um, the press and the establishment.

Trevor:

You know, he remembered the professors, but um.

Trevor:

Well, I just think he was trying to make the

Scott:

point about the education system because, you know, he wants to

Scott:

abolish the Department of Education.

Trevor:

Yes.

Trevor:

Uh, does he?

Joe:

Yeah.

Joe:

You know when your work is too educated, otherwise they get ideas.

Joe:

Yeah,

Trevor:

kind of that.

Trevor:

Uh, the Republican convention was full of people kissing the ring.

Scott:

Mmm.

Trevor:

Most notably, Nikki Haley.

Trevor:

Here's a little bit of her.

Haley:

Donald Trump has my strong endorsement, period.

Clip:

That was

Haley:

Donald Trump has my strong endorsement, period.

Clip:

That was Nikki Haley on the convention floor last night.

Clip:

And here's a reminder of what she used to sound like just four short months ago.

Clip:

Of course, many of the same politicians who now publicly

Clip:

embrace Trump privately dread him.

Clip:

They know what a disaster he's been and will continue to be for our party.

Clip:

They're just too afraid to say it out loud.

Clip:

Well, I'm not afraid to say the hard truths out loud.

Clip:

I feel no need to kiss the ring.

Trevor:

Well, she didn't then.

Trevor:

Four months later, she felt the need to kiss the

Joe:

ring.

Joe:

Where's her sticking plaster?

Trevor:

Yes, for those unaware, people at the Republican Convention were wearing a

Trevor:

big wad of sticking, of sort of a bandage on their left ear, right ear, as support.

Trevor:

for Donald Trump, who was wearing a very oversized bandage on his ear, so, uh

Trevor:

The supporters were just wearing that.

Trevor:

Did you not see that, Scott?

Scott:

Yeah, I did see it.

Scott:

That was ridiculous that he had such a huge bandage and everything over on his,

Scott:

um, on his ear because the whole thing was, it was just a, it was just a little

Scott:

nick, yes, with an AR 15, which yes, would have been fatal had it been quarter

Scott:

of an inch over, but you know, it's.

Scott:

Just ridiculous that he actually wore something like that.

Scott:

And then you had this other situation that people were cutting up sanitary

Scott:

napkins and that sort of stuff to tape them to their ears so that

Scott:

they could look like Donald Trump.

Scott:

It was a joke.

Joe:

I did see the comment that, uh, it's not since Stormy Daniels

Joe:

has a woman, uh, have women been so disappointed by two inches.

Joe:

Yeah.

Trevor:

Um, so yeah, shameless, uh, Nikki Haley, just completely shameless.

Trevor:

Carrie Lake was the governor in Arizona who was disputing that the, um, election

Trevor:

was valid and interesting interview where the interviewer really nails it.

Trevor:

This is a great example of an interviewer knowing their stuff, keeping

Trevor:

their cool and being able to just.

Trevor:

Um, Not Let Go, with an interviewee who's just talking shit.

Trevor:

So, this is a little bit of a longish one, but pay attention to the, the way

Trevor:

that this particular journalist had such a, a really good grasp of the facts,

Trevor:

and I thought conducted this as about as well as you possibly could, so, um.

Trevor:

So, yeah, in the chat room, Mike Tyson, this is from Greg, Mike Tyson

Trevor:

bit off a guy's ear off, and he didn't wear as big a bandage as Trump did.

Trevor:

Alright, here's, uh, Carrie Lake, um, yeah, we'll play some of this.

Clip:

I actually think you need your head examined.

Clip:

Can you answer that?

Clip:

I think you need your head examined.

Clip:

Donald Trump has talked, Ms.

Clip:

Trump's talked about the need for a new, uh, Tone in politics, a

Clip:

civility in politics, a kind of unity.

Clip:

What does that mean to you?

Clip:

I actually think the tone has always been good.

Clip:

I believe that what we're trying to push is a strong economy, secure borders.

Clip:

These are policies everybody wants.

Clip:

You don't think the tone in American politics got out of hand?

Clip:

I think the tone It's really disturbing when the media is calling

Clip:

a man like Donald Trump, Hitler.

Clip:

They're comparing him to Hitler.

Clip:

Like J.

Clip:

D.

Clip:

Vance.

Clip:

Like the media is doing.

Clip:

But J.

Clip:

D.

Clip:

Vance was probably, like many Americans, they listen to the media.

Clip:

And for eight years, the media has been tearing President Trump apart.

Clip:

A good man who everybody loved before he ran.

Clip:

Imagine having a smear campaign going on about you for eight years.

Clip:

Pretty soon, everyone wouldn't like you.

Clip:

And so I applaud the fact that people like J.

Clip:

D.

Clip:

Vance and others, we've seen Amber Rose.

Clip:

She did a speech.

Clip:

People are coming over going, Whoa, the media was lying and I believed it.

Clip:

And it's so irresponsible.

Clip:

And you falsely claimed that Trump won in 2020.

Clip:

You called for the imprisonment of those who accepted Trump's defeat, including

Clip:

your own opponent in Arizona, Katie Hobbs.

Clip:

Why did you do that?

Clip:

Called for the imprisonment of what?

Clip:

Of opponents like Katie Hobbs who accepted Trump's defeat.

Clip:

Why did you falsely claim that Trump won in 2020?

Clip:

Well, I'm not going to sit here and go through all of

Clip:

the evidence of what happened.

Clip:

Do you believe Joe Biden won 81 million votes?

Clip:

Do you think he's more popular?

Clip:

A guy who can't string two sentences together.

Clip:

You believe he's more Obama?

Clip:

I'm asking you, do you believe that he is the most popular president in history?

Clip:

You have to have evidence.

Clip:

Half you gotta have brain cells.

Clip:

Okay, so you don't believe that Joe Biden won the election in 2020 The

Clip:

election was run fraudulently and you refuse to concede in 2022 as well your

Clip:

own contest Well, obviously obviously you're sitting across the pond and you

Clip:

don't understand what's happened and I'm not gonna argue about it for defamation

Clip:

Because this is how corrupt the system

Trevor:

Goes on

Joe:

Because Biden got more votes than Obama deed Therefore it's fraud.

Joe:

It couldn't be that people were worried about Trump getting back in and therefore

Joe:

turned out and droves to vote for Biden whether they liked him or not.

Scott:

I think there was a hell of that because you did have a higher turnout.

Scott:

Yeah, absolutely.

Scott:

People had actually seen what the Trump presidency was like and

Scott:

they didn't want to repeat it.

Trevor:

Anyway, good work by the interviewer there and the rest of

Trevor:

that interview she nails her but it's probably a little bit too long for this.

Trevor:

Um, A little bit of, um, just crazy American stuff.

Trevor:

Article from the New York Times, so it must be true.

Trevor:

Um, in Las Vegas and surrounding communities, more than 97, sorry, 970, 000

Trevor:

feet of electrical wiring, uh, that's the equivalent of 184 miles, have gone missing

Trevor:

from streetlights over the past two years.

Trevor:

The lights are going out across American citizens, they're going out across

Trevor:

American cities, As a result of a brazen and opportunistic type of crime, thieves

Trevor:

have been stripping copper wire out of thousands of streetlights and selling

Trevor:

it to scrap metal recyclers for cash.

Trevor:

Oh, there's a good sign of the decline of the entirety of the world.

Trevor:

I

Joe:

have actually heard that, I think in the UK.

Joe:

Right.

Joe:

That, um, it was, it was public parks, they'd been pulling up the cable to

Joe:

steal, going to light poles in the parks.

Joe:

Right.

Joe:

Yeah.

Joe:

But that's under 14 years of Conservative government, rather

Joe:

than under two years of Joe Biden.

Joe:

Ah, dear.

Joe:

I think people are doing it tough all over the world.

Trevor:

Yes, that is doing it tough.

Trevor:

I haven't heard of that in Australia yet, of people pulling up public wiring in, in

Scott:

They don't, they only steal if it hasn't actually been, if it hasn't

Scott:

been, if it hasn't been used, it's it.

Scott:

So they do have a problem with, um, uh, the cables and that sort of stuff

Scott:

going missing from, uh, the yards and whatnot over there, and Energex.

Scott:

So stuff will go missing from there.

Scott:

And if you also, any of the.

Scott:

One of the more security conscious builders and everything up here is

Scott:

actually really worried about their job sites until they can get them secure

Scott:

because the copper, the copper pipes and everything are going missing.

Scott:

So people do actually knock that sort of stuff off.

Trevor:

You know when they have the sort of, um, street dump thing

Trevor:

where you put your rubbish out on the footpath to get collected?

Trevor:

If you put out an appliance with an electric cord and people

Trevor:

come along and snip the cord and leave the appliance behind?

Trevor:

Yes, that happens.

Joe:

Um, I remember talking to a telecoms guy who'd been in Africa

Joe:

and was saying, you know, they had such a problem with people digging

Joe:

up the phone lines for the copper.

Joe:

When fibre came in, they went, great, we won't have this problem anymore.

Joe:

And a couple of weeks later, the fibre optics had been dug

Joe:

up and turned into a table lamp.

Trevor:

Landon Hardbottom says, thanks for the side hustle idea, Fist.

Scott:

I can't imagine Landon actually getting out and doing it himself.

Trevor:

He'd probably pay minions to do it.

Trevor:

Yeah.

Trevor:

Liz Truss, former British PM, and now very pro Republican.

Trevor:

He's been hanging around that convention and making speeches.

Joe:

Nigel Farage has gone over there as well.

Trevor:

Yes.

Trevor:

He

Joe:

was going to go and become Trump's aide or something, wasn't he?

Trevor:

Yes.

Trevor:

But that's Nigel Farage.

Trevor:

We've got Liz Cruster.

Trevor:

He's a former British Prime Minister.

Joe:

Well, she's just as nutty.

Joe:

Yeah,

Scott:

I know.

Scott:

But isn't Nigel Remember, she tanked

Joe:

the British economy in 40 days.

Joe:

Yeah.

Joe:

Yeah.

Joe:

Yeah.

Scott:

Yeah.

Scott:

Isn't Nigel Farage an MP in the British government?

Scott:

He is now an MP.

Scott:

Yeah, he's not in the British government, but anyway, he is

Scott:

an MP in British Parliament.

Trevor:

Yeah, anyway, this is what the UK is missing out on with

Trevor:

Liz Truss not in power anymore.

Clip:

I have to confess I've never been to Pennsylvania, but I do

Clip:

have in my possession a liberty.

Clip:

I have to confess I've never been to Pennsylvania, but I do

Clip:

have in my possession a liberty.

Clip:

A Liberty Bell Showerhead, which is, which is an exact replica of the

Clip:

showerhead that President Reagan has in his ranch in California, which I

Clip:

recently visited, and I will be proudly installing this showerhead as a symbol.

Clip:

of liberty and democracy, and of course, Pennsylvania.

Clip:

Because you all know, you all know why you're so important, which is this is a

Clip:

crucial state in order for President Trump to be reinstalled in the White House.

Scott:

Yep, she was in there.

Trevor:

There you go, Landon, there's another idea.

Trevor:

Start manufacturing Liberty Bell shower heads.

Trevor:

Mate, you are going to clean up.

Trevor:

If you can make those widely available.

Trevor:

Oh, that's the former Prime Minister.

Trevor:

It's just, it's so sad that this, there we go.

Trevor:

That's, that's where we've reached.

Trevor:

Ah, what else have I got here?

Trevor:

Um, Yeah, I mean we could make fun of Americans and crazy people all

Trevor:

day, which we will continue to do.

Trevor:

Um, this one coming up is, what have I got here?

Trevor:

It's um,

Trevor:

Donald Jr's girlfriend, Kimberly Guilfoyle.

Trevor:

She gets to make speeches at this convention.

Trevor:

Good God.

Trevor:

Um, hers was a cracker.

Trevor:

Um, I'll play, I'll play some of hers.

Trevor:

Um, here we go.

Clip:

It is no wonder that the heroes who stormed the beaches of Normandy

Clip:

and faced down communism sadly say they don't recognize our country anymore.

Clip:

This is not

Trevor:

There you go, um Stormed Normandy to face down communism.

Scott:

Yeah, no.

Scott:

Well, they did face down communists once they, once they got to the,

Scott:

uh, river in the center of Germany and they linked hands with them.

Trevor:

Yeah, well, that wasn't facing them down, was it?

Scott:

No, it was facing them, that's all.

Scott:

But, you know, Yes,

Trevor:

yes.

Trevor:

I think it just

Scott:

had so much Botox in there, it's no longer working, it's fucked up her brain.

Joe:

If you want, for a mere 72.

Joe:

31 from Amazon, you can buy a Liberty Bell shower head.

Trevor:

And they're available already.

Joe:

Yeah.

Trevor:

There you go.

Trevor:

Of course they would be.

Joe:

Well, that's where she got hers from, I think.

Trevor:

Right.

Trevor:

72.

Joe:

Yeah.

Scott:

US.

Trevor:

Plus postage.

Scott:

There we go.

Scott:

Maybe Landon was ahead of the game after all.

Scott:

Yeah.

Trevor:

Yeah.

Trevor:

What else have I got here?

Trevor:

Um, an old clip of Joe Biden when he still had his marbles.

Trevor:

Um, play this one.

Clip:

Our conversation with Zaganoff was repeated with Leavitt.

Clip:

They talked about they don't want this NATO expansion.

Clip:

They know it's not in their security interest and on and on

Clip:

and said, well, and if you do that, we may have to look to China.

Clip:

And I couldn't help using the colloquial expression from my

Clip:

state by saying to Zaganoff, lots of luck in your senior year.

Clip:

Um, you know, uh, good luck.

Clip:

And if that doesn't work, try Rand.

Clip:

Um, and uh, I'm serious.

Clip:

I said that to them and these were, uh, And, and, and they know, I

Clip:

knew, they knew, everybody knows.

Clip:

That that is not an option and everybody knows every one of those leaders

Clip:

acknowledges and needs and they resent it But they need, they need to look West and

Clip:

the question is where this is deserved.

Trevor:

Well, actually they don't, turns out.

Trevor:

So Russia has turned to Iran and China and Going quite well for

Trevor:

them in terms of their economy.

Trevor:

So let's just go just to show how the world has changed that it was just

Trevor:

laughable um for Russia to consider teaming up with Iran and China as

Trevor:

if that would help them in any way.

Trevor:

And now, of course, they're completely able to bypass the U.

Trevor:

S.

Trevor:

system.

Trevor:

And times have changed.

Trevor:

He was more, um, had more vigor back in the day.

Trevor:

He was younger.

Trevor:

Yeah.

Trevor:

Had more hair.

Trevor:

Yeah.

Trevor:

Um, what else have I got here?

Trevor:

Shall we talk about, um, the Labor Party and religion?

Scott:

Yeah, I think so.

Trevor:

So, private schools, Scott.

Scott:

Yeah, I know.

Trevor:

In the five years to 2022, private schools in New

Trevor:

South Wales spent an estimated 1.

Trevor:

5 billion on capital projects.

Trevor:

1.

Trevor:

5 billion, private schools, New South Wales, five years.

Trevor:

Building funds, which parents are encouraged to donate to, are given tax

Trevor:

deductible status by the Commonwealth.

Trevor:

New South Wales.

Trevor:

The Australian Productivity Commission called for these building

Trevor:

funds to be stripped of their tax deductible status in a report,

Trevor:

and the response from the Albanese government was swift and unequivocal.

Trevor:

Andrew Lee said the proposed changes are not being considered.

Trevor:

So, there we go.

Trevor:

A productivity commission says, here's an idea.

Trevor:

Remove a religious privilege.

Trevor:

Labor.

Trevor:

The first thing it does in response to the report is say,

Trevor:

uh, not that particular idea.

Trevor:

That's not happening.

Joe:

It's not necessarily religion.

Joe:

It could be completely a religious private schools.

Joe:

The point is that private schools are getting funded by the taxpayer

Joe:

in terms of tax breaks, and none of that money is flowing down into the

Joe:

public schools that are underfunded.

Trevor:

Yeah.

Trevor:

But either way.

Trevor:

Yes, true.

Trevor:

It doesn't have to be religious.

Trevor:

No, that's true.

Trevor:

So yes, disappointing federal Labor from that point of view.

Trevor:

We were talking earlier about the difference between, you know,

Trevor:

what does it matter whether the Republicans or the Democrats get in?

Trevor:

Did it make much difference having Albanese and not having Scott

Trevor:

Morrison, other than stage 3 tax cuts?

Trevor:

Was there any other issue where we could have said things are different because

Trevor:

of Albanese rather than Scott Morrison?

Scott:

Not really.

Scott:

You know, that's just a, um, that's symptomatic of our compulsory voting

Scott:

system and everything over here.

Scott:

It forces both parties to compete for the centre.

Scott:

So you've got the centre right and the centre left.

Scott:

It is a preferable system because you do not have to try and motivate

Scott:

your base by throwing out red meat to the left wing or red meat to the

Scott:

right wing to get them out to vote for you, which is a preferable system.

Scott:

So I honestly believe that because there's not that much difference between the

Scott:

right wing of the Labor Party and the left wing of the Liberal Party, then you've

Scott:

got a position that's going to be fairly much the same regardless of who wins.

Scott:

Now, clearly that was preferable what Albanese did with the Stage 3 tax cuts.

Scott:

But that is probably the only real difference between the two parties.

Scott:

And, you know, looking at the religion treatment and that sort of stuff, they're

Scott:

pretty much on a line ball call with that.

Scott:

Mm.

Scott:

You know, that, that was ridiculous.

Scott:

Like, you know, they, they could have actually, they could have actually said,

Scott:

well, the um, uh, they could have actually said, well, you know, the, um, who was it?

Scott:

Productivity Commission said you scrap it, didn't they?

Scott:

Yeah.

Scott:

Yeah, they could have actually used that as cover.

Scott:

They could have said, well, the Productivity Commission sold us to remove

Scott:

this, so that's why we're doing it.

Scott:

But they didn't do that.

Scott:

No.

Scott:

God knows why.

Scott:

Yeah.

Trevor:

Well, Scott, it's just going to make it easier when you eventually are

Trevor:

in that voting booth and you put down a vote for the, for um, the Greens.

Trevor:

I'm not looking

Scott:

forward to that.

Trevor:

I'm

Scott:

not looking forward to it at all.

Trevor:

Just keep that sort of issue in mind as you put that little stroke

Trevor:

of the pencil for the number one.

Trevor:

Yeah, don't

Joe:

forget, when you preference the greens, that tells Labor that you're

Joe:

not happy with their centrist position and you want them further left.

Scott:

Yeah,

Trevor:

that'll feel good, Scott.

Scott:

I'll have to wait and see.

Trevor:

Locally?

Trevor:

No, still federally.

Trevor:

Um, Speaker of the House of Representatives, Milton Dick, is set

Trevor:

to appear alongside controversial religious figures at an event

Trevor:

promoting the influence of conservative Christianity throughout Australia.

Trevor:

It's the RAW 24 Leaders Summit in Brisbane.

Trevor:

And early September.

Trevor:

Are they raw dogging too?

Trevor:

What's that?

Joe:

I said are they raw dogging too?

Trevor:

Well.

Trevor:

Raw 24.

Trevor:

Um, Critics of the event, The Rationalist Society, called the

Trevor:

summit an event promoting the Seven Mountains Mandate ideology.

Trevor:

Now, there's going to be a bunch of hard cored Christians, and, um.

Trevor:

Speaker of the House, Milton Dick, is gonna be there.

Trevor:

They're just as captured by religion as the rest of them.

Trevor:

Ah, finally, here's an interesting one.

Trevor:

This might cause more arguments.

Trevor:

The CFMEU, they're not so bad, are they?

Trevor:

Okay, go on, give it to us.

Trevor:

This was an article in Crikey.

Joe:

Mm, I read it.

Trevor:

Yeah, Guy Rundle.

Trevor:

And what he's essentially saying is that, that the CFMEU is one of the few unions or

Trevor:

perhaps the only union that has actually made sure that workers got their share

Trevor:

of, of the money that's flying around.

Trevor:

And that.

Joe:

Unlike the shoppies.

Trevor:

Unlike the shoppies and many other unions.

Trevor:

And in this whole sort of debate about the worth or value of the CFMEU, there's

Trevor:

very little discussion where people go, uh, you know, we've got guys who

Trevor:

are actually earning good money and living good lifestyles as a result

Trevor:

of, of the union, um, on their behalf.

Trevor:

So that was sort of Guy Rundle's argument.

Trevor:

And he, in his, in the article also, sort of hinting that a lot of the

Trevor:

allegations against them are a beat up and what would you expect from

Trevor:

someone like, um, the Fairfax Papers.

Trevor:

Um, what else can we say that he says here?

Trevor:

Um, let's see if I can find some interesting bits.

Trevor:

Um, yeah, he's kind of saying that, that in Victoria there was a huge

Trevor:

number of big infrastructure projects.

Trevor:

Which big companies were more than willing to, uh, get involved in, even though the

Trevor:

CFMEU would be controlling the worksites.

Trevor:

Because they were getting big money from the government, and if it wasn't

Trevor:

big enough to cover the expense, they could go back to the government.

Trevor:

And the government would give them more money to cover the expense.

Trevor:

So he's saying that there's all sorts of funny money flying around by the Victorian

Trevor:

Labour Party on big ticket infrastructure and the CFMEU made sure that their

Trevor:

members got a fair share of that fat pie that was there and that other unions.

Trevor:

So, um, uh, what else did he say here?

Trevor:

He's not saying that the leadership are innocent of misdoings, um, but he's also

Trevor:

pointing out that At different times, um, the developers hired bikies to keep the

Trevor:

CFMEU out of the, um, out of the picture.

Trevor:

And, uh, uh, anyway, it was an argument providing a sort of a flip

Trevor:

side to the narrative that's being put out there about the evil CFMEU.

Trevor:

They're basically pointing out, yes, but, at the end of the day, one of

Trevor:

the few unions that's actually got, undoubtedly, benefits for its members.

Trevor:

What do you think of that idea, Scott?

Trevor:

Well,

Scott:

I wondered whether or not there was another side to it,

Scott:

and I still haven't read Crikey.

Scott:

But it's, um, it's one of those things.

Scott:

Now, Sitka's obviously a vile human being, you know, he has been involved

Scott:

in some fairly ghastly things towards women and that sort of stuff, so, you

Scott:

know, I think that we could all pretty much understand that he's a prick, but

Scott:

I honestly believe that, um, there's probably a fair bit of envy going on down

Scott:

there, like the, um, other unions might be a bit envious of the CFMEU because they're

Scott:

getting good deals for their workers.

Scott:

You know, um, I hadn't read the, I haven't read the article, um, to go

Scott:

through it and that sort of stuff.

Scott:

So I will actually read it now.

Scott:

It doesn't surprise me that someone has actually taken the other

Scott:

side to it and had a look at it.

Scott:

Because, you know, the other thing is it's always just coming out of the

Scott:

right wing media saying that they're a bunch of bastards and everything

Scott:

else, which you could actually think of, well, they can't all be bastards.

Scott:

You know, now, sick is obviously a vile human being.

Scott:

But, you know, that doesn't mean that he didn't have the best interest

Scott:

of his union members at heart.

Scott:

And I would actually, I'd actually prefer to be part of a more militant

Scott:

union than the one I'm part of.

Scott:

But anyway, it is what it is.

Trevor:

Rundle says, does one really believe that wage theft in bars and

Trevor:

restaurants would have been so open, so gluttonous, so cruel and indifferent,

Trevor:

had hospitality and retail had a major union as militant as the CFMEU?

Scott:

No,

Trevor:

exactly.

Trevor:

Good point.

Scott:

It's one of those things, I just think that if we could go back to the way

Scott:

it was in the 70s, when, you know, yes, it was a pain in the ass, because every

Scott:

summer the trolley dolls wouldn't fly.

Scott:

Every winter the power got turned off and the beer wasn't made by,

Scott:

made by Christmas because the unions are actually closing it all down.

Scott:

However, we also had a lot fairer distribution of money and that sort of

Scott:

stuff between workers and the employers back then than what we have now.

Scott:

And I honestly believe if you did have militancy out there, just enough to

Scott:

scare the pants off the employers, So then they had to turn around and

Scott:

actually start giving their, giving their workforce a reasonable living.

Scott:

Then that would be enough to turn things around.

Scott:

So if we had a few more CFMEUs out there Just to scare the pants

Scott:

off the work, off the employers, that it would actually improve.

Scott:

Anyway,

Trevor:

Joe, were you about to say something?

Joe:

You know, I was on an infrastructure build down in Victoria 10, I don't know,

Joe:

15 years ago, and literally as I got on site, I was hit up when I was doing the

Joe:

health and safety, uh, by the union rep going, so, uh, what's your hourly rate?

Joe:

And you know, what, what penalties are you getting?

Joe:

To make sure I was getting a fair deal if I was coming on his work site.

Joe:

Uh, and you know, I'm all for that.

Joe:

I I've seen how not all employers, but some employers can screw, uh,

Joe:

workers over any way they can.

Joe:

And I think we need strong unions to protect.

Joe:

Yeah, the disparity between the haves and the have nots at the moment,

Joe:

I think, is very much down to a, um, a less unionized workforce.

Scott:

If we had a more unionized workforce, I don't think that

Scott:

they would get away with it as much as they are lately.

Scott:

But, it's one of those things, I don't know how you're going to reverse that,

Scott:

because you've got a lot of people in the private sector, even, even friends

Scott:

of mine that are miners, and that sort of stuff, they're saying they don't

Scott:

want to, they don't want to sign up to the union, because they reckon

Scott:

the union's only in it for the money.

Scott:

Have you

Joe:

seen the red unions?

Scott:

Sorry?

Joe:

Are you aware of the Red Unions?

Scott:

No, who are they?

Joe:

Uh, they are a bunch of new unions that have been set up allegedly by members

Joe:

of the LNP or former members of the LNP.

Scott:

Okay, gotcha.

Joe:

Um, so they were very pro supporting the health workers that were anti vax.

Joe:

So they're, yeah, pro liberty and pro this and pro that.

Scott:

Yeah, it's a load of nonsense, yeah.

Trevor:

Mm.

Trevor:

So just at the end of this article, Guy Rundle says, Through all this,

Trevor:

one comes neither to bury John Setka, nor to praise him, nor to romanticise

Trevor:

any violence that may have arisen.

Trevor:

The leadership is a collective, and who did what, good and bad,

Trevor:

is as much a mystery to outsiders as is any merry band of brothers.

Trevor:

But now is the time to show basic solidarity for a union whose main crime

Trevor:

appears to be to have gained, quite possibly, the best deal for manual

Trevor:

workers in the history of the world.

Trevor:

This goes on, unless one retains the bourgeois illusion that one

Trevor:

deserves to be paid more because of having done a degree in.

Trevor:

Semiotics or Film Noir still being paid off.

Trevor:

The success of the CFMEU should be taken by workers everywhere more as

Trevor:

an affirmative lesson, not a warning.

Trevor:

Forget the nonsense about lollipop sign holders etc etc.

Trevor:

Construction remains hard, long and sometimes dangerous work.

Trevor:

Good luck to anyone who got a share of the profits out of it by the CFMEU.

Trevor:

Solidarity can be built from it but It is made, not given, by

Trevor:

the hard labour of organising.

Trevor:

So, anyway, I thought it was an interesting sort of flip on the

Trevor:

narrative of just a bunch of bullies and you've got to remember, they've

Trevor:

achieved more for their members than any other union in Australia and through

Trevor:

collective solidarity, so good point, Guy Rundle, quite enjoy reading his stuff.

Trevor:

And there we have it, gentlemen.

Trevor:

That's a tick over the hour.

Trevor:

That was fun.

Trevor:

I really enjoyed the argument at the beginning.

Trevor:

That was almost, uh, 12th man ish.

Trevor:

It was.

Scott:

I would have thought we probably had a bit of a different point

Scott:

than what the 12th man would have.

Scott:

Exactly.

Trevor:

We haven't been meeting the spectator.

Trevor:

Yeah, but the style of, you know, good old fashioned disagreement.

Trevor:

I liked it.

Trevor:

Exactly.

Trevor:

Right, gentlemen, you're around next week.

Trevor:

Yeah, I'm around.

Trevor:

I'm around.

Trevor:

Joe's around.

Trevor:

Okay.

Trevor:

We'll talk to you then.

Trevor:

Bye for now.