00:00:18.280 --> 00:00:22.580
Welcome to the Neurodiversity and Improv Podcast from Flat Improv.
00:00:22.580 --> 00:00:28.360
I'm Jen deHaan, and I do improv stuff, and I like thinking about improv things too.
00:00:28.360 --> 00:00:32.380
These podcasts here are not for telling you what to do.
00:00:32.380 --> 00:00:44.220
They are just explanations about some cognitive stuff to help classes, teams, and improv in general be a little bit more inclusive, and maybe a little bit easier for some of us that think the way that we do.
00:00:44.220 --> 00:00:51.340
They're certainly not for diagnosis, so please don't use these episodes to diagnose yourself or anyone else.
00:00:51.340 --> 00:00:56.880
These episodes are just to think about the way that we think cognitively.
00:00:56.880 --> 00:01:03.160
Basically, these podcasts are for big improv nerds to be improv nerds.
00:01:03.160 --> 00:01:09.580
Like if you are subscribed or listening to this kind of thing, you are probably an improv nerd.
00:01:09.580 --> 00:01:10.960
So let's get started.
00:01:10.960 --> 00:01:13.900
Welcome to episode 10 of the series.
00:01:14.220 --> 00:01:17.660
We are keeping it really niche for this episode.
00:01:17.660 --> 00:01:23.060
In fact, I'm not even sure what a non-niche episode would even be in this series.
00:01:23.060 --> 00:01:24.880
I'm quite curious.
00:01:24.880 --> 00:01:35.200
Anyways, this episode will describe what hyperphantasia is and how this form of visual imagination can be utilized in improv.
00:01:35.200 --> 00:01:39.900
It's especially useful for memory over, say, a long form set.
00:01:39.900 --> 00:01:50.180
And it's especially great for creating characters or, say, figuring out what to do for a particular emotion word that you've been given to work with.
00:01:50.180 --> 00:01:53.000
Say that's an issue for you like it is for me.
00:01:53.000 --> 00:02:03.600
I'll cover what hyperphantasia and related visual processing is, and I'll provide an overview of how that affects and is used in improv.
00:02:03.600 --> 00:02:12.360
And I'll cover much more detail about characters and memory and memory recall in a future, even more, Nishi episode.
00:02:12.360 --> 00:02:13.320
Is Nishi a word?
00:02:13.320 --> 00:02:16.680
I don't like that word, but I'm, you know what, I'm going to leave it in.
00:02:16.680 --> 00:02:18.020
So the basics now.
00:02:18.020 --> 00:02:19.940
What is hyperphantasia?
00:02:21.160 --> 00:02:32.240
Hyperphantasia is described as a photorealistic imagination, a particularly strong ability to imagine visual details.
00:02:32.240 --> 00:02:35.220
Hyperphantasia is that one end of a spectrum.
00:02:35.220 --> 00:02:37.700
The other end of that spectrum is aphantasia.
00:02:37.920 --> 00:02:46.040
The spectrum is the general amount of visual imagination or visual processing you cognitively do.
00:02:46.040 --> 00:02:51.880
Most humans have some amount of visual imagination, just bearing degrees of use.
00:02:51.880 --> 00:02:59.300
So I think that most of you will probably know what I'm talking about, at least in a general sense.
00:02:59.300 --> 00:03:04.840
So hyperphantasia is a particularly vivid mental imagery or imagination.
00:03:05.060 --> 00:03:11.880
It's as vivid as you would see something with your eyes, but of course, imagined in your head.
00:03:11.880 --> 00:03:14.540
It's not actually seeing things.
00:03:14.540 --> 00:03:22.800
It's described and certainly true for me, as also connected to other elements of an environment like sound, humidity, emotions and so on.
00:03:22.800 --> 00:03:31.560
So when I remember something, say I'm recalling something from my past, I will potentially see that environment as vivid as I originally did.
00:03:31.760 --> 00:03:38.480
And I would also perhaps be remembering the sounds, humidity, emotions that I felt at the time, that kind of thing.
00:03:38.480 --> 00:03:42.700
I'll process all of these along with those visuals.
00:03:42.700 --> 00:03:53.620
Hyperphantasia is often tested on a casual basis by asking people to describe what they see in specific scenarios that are often very seen like in nature.
00:03:53.620 --> 00:04:01.420
Simple tests around recall of like what you had for breakfast the previous day and the level of detail that you remember of that breakfast.
00:04:01.620 --> 00:04:04.340
These sort of tests are described online.
00:04:04.340 --> 00:04:12.200
Like do you remember and feel everything as though you were sitting down there again, repeat and looking right at your breakfast?
00:04:12.200 --> 00:04:13.720
What was the light like?
00:04:13.720 --> 00:04:14.780
What was the room like?
00:04:14.780 --> 00:04:15.660
What were you hearing?
00:04:15.660 --> 00:04:16.560
What were you feeling?
00:04:16.560 --> 00:04:17.400
What was the plate?
00:04:17.400 --> 00:04:19.320
What was the type of fork you were using?
00:04:19.320 --> 00:04:20.380
Can you see it?
00:04:20.380 --> 00:04:23.620
Can you see the glints of light on that fork still?
00:04:23.620 --> 00:04:28.920
It's kind of like scene painting, but you're eating your breakfast from yesterday morning for real.
00:04:29.180 --> 00:04:37.080
Of note, though, there are studies with MRI tests, decoding and behavioral, psychophysical experiments and so on.
00:04:37.080 --> 00:04:41.440
But this is a niche field and access to getting those kind of tests is very limited.
00:04:41.440 --> 00:04:45.760
So most of us are left to reading on the Internet and doing those Internet tests.
00:04:45.760 --> 00:04:52.760
So it kind of comes down to if someone describes something to you, can you see a picture of it in your mind?
00:04:52.760 --> 00:04:59.060
If you try to recall a few days ago a particular scenario, can you see that again in your mind?
00:04:59.060 --> 00:05:03.420
If it was a particularly strong or notable thing that happened to you?
00:05:03.420 --> 00:05:07.900
How strong or what's missing in the level of detail is the spectrum?
00:05:07.900 --> 00:05:13.160
So it's also important to add what this is not about.
00:05:13.160 --> 00:05:15.360
What is hyperphantasia not?
00:05:15.360 --> 00:05:19.060
Hyperphantasia is not the same as photographic memory.
00:05:19.060 --> 00:05:26.000
Photographic memory is a short term and highly precise visual recall of something that you have seen.
00:05:26.300 --> 00:05:38.640
It's often described as like seeing a page of text very briefly and then that person is able to recite all of the words from memory, but they don't necessarily see the image anymore visually.
00:05:38.640 --> 00:05:44.700
If someone has eidetic memory, this person has a longer recall and they see the image.
00:05:44.700 --> 00:05:50.300
And both of these things are considered to be extremely rare, especially in adults.
00:05:50.300 --> 00:05:53.260
And they're also both unproven scientifically.
00:05:53.500 --> 00:05:58.240
Some of these things might be ability or training, memorization, etc.
00:05:58.240 --> 00:06:10.060
Hyperphantasia is more about photorealistic visualization or imagination, say of any kind of environment, a described one or a particularly notable memory of your past.
00:06:10.060 --> 00:06:27.120
For example, it's like visualizing while you read a book, what is described on the page, or recreating that memory of that thing that you've experienced in the past, and it doesn't necessarily have that same amount of detail specifically from the memory.
00:06:27.120 --> 00:06:35.900
The other two conditions, photographic memory and eidetic, are near perfect recall of very highly specific details.
00:06:35.900 --> 00:06:51.940
Anyways, the differences between these three things and these three specific topics as well in the scientific sense are beyond the scope of this podcast, and there's lots of information out there for you to go find on these other things if you're interested and want to do that deep dive.
00:06:51.940 --> 00:07:02.140
So, fantasia is on a spectrum and the two ends of the spectrum, hyperphantasia and aphantasia, each hold about two to three percent of the population.
00:07:02.140 --> 00:07:06.060
So, we're talking about four to six percent of the population in total.
00:07:06.060 --> 00:07:09.280
Everyone else is somewhere in between.
00:07:09.280 --> 00:07:13.920
So, the other end of the spectrum from hyperphantasia is aphantasia.
00:07:13.920 --> 00:07:23.320
And this is where the mind, the imagination does not form or construct mental images or visual representations of objects or environments.
00:07:23.320 --> 00:07:29.020
It doesn't mean that the memory is weakened and there is no cognitive impairment involved.
00:07:29.020 --> 00:07:37.180
Someone with aphantasia can still describe a scene like a sunset, but they just don't create a mental picture of it while they do so.
00:07:37.180 --> 00:07:44.620
Obviously, I don't know what the aphantasia experience is like, or of note other conditions in this general space.
00:07:44.620 --> 00:08:01.900
I do know great improvisers with aphantasia, because of course other forms of memory and recall are being used by them, and I'd be fascinated to hear more about improvising with the lack of visual imagery, and what other forms of recall are being used, and what that's like.
00:08:01.900 --> 00:08:04.600
But I don't know, so I'll leave it at that.
00:08:04.600 --> 00:08:08.660
So is hyperphantasia and aphantasia a neurodivergence or what?
00:08:08.660 --> 00:08:22.800
Hyperphantasia and aphantasia have been called neutral neurodivergence, or straight up a form of neurodivergence, a neurocognitive phenomenon, a psychophysical condition, and so on.
00:08:22.800 --> 00:08:24.380
They've been called a lot of things.
00:08:24.380 --> 00:08:29.740
They're also not generally considered to be disorders at this time.
00:08:29.740 --> 00:08:41.240
According to the sources I have come across, at least most of the science on the condition is focused on visual aspects as well, and there's a lot of disagreement in the literature.
00:08:41.440 --> 00:08:46.500
So, I won't get into the science because I won't do it any justice.
00:08:46.500 --> 00:08:53.040
And I'm also not sure there's a whole lot of relevance in this episode to the science part of it anyways.
00:08:53.040 --> 00:08:56.300
And I reckon that you aren't here for that deep dive either.
00:08:56.300 --> 00:08:59.840
But it's out there to access online if you're interested.
00:08:59.840 --> 00:09:09.640
And as with all of these variables that I've already mentioned and will mention, there are lots of overlaps with other forms of neurodivergence.
00:09:09.740 --> 00:09:16.260
So it's gonna be very, very different for everyone depending on what you have going on.
00:09:16.260 --> 00:09:22.080
So in this part of the podcast, I'm gonna talk about what is hyperphantasia like?
00:09:22.080 --> 00:09:23.860
What is the experience like?
00:09:23.860 --> 00:09:29.620
Because I don't know what it's like for aphantasia and I can't speak to that, but I'm very curious about that.
00:09:29.620 --> 00:09:48.220
So I should probably describe for you what my experience is like, because that might help you understand what you're experiencing a little bit more, how relevant this is to you, or maybe if you're teaching people or coaching people, this will help you understand what some of your students might be experiencing.
00:09:48.220 --> 00:09:59.480
Because even if it's not hyperphantasia, a lot of people could be very high on the fantasia spectrum towards it and might be experiencing things in their improv like this anyways.
00:09:59.480 --> 00:10:05.560
Or some of these tips might be helpful for you if you are average fantasia, like right in the middle of that spectrum.
00:10:05.560 --> 00:10:06.020
I don't know.
00:10:06.360 --> 00:10:09.820
Anyways, I'll explain what my experience is like.
00:10:09.820 --> 00:10:16.800
For a long time, I really thought that everyone thought and saw things kind of the same way.
00:10:16.800 --> 00:10:23.640
And this is really the very common neurodivergent experience of, wait a minute, doesn't everyone think this way?
00:10:23.640 --> 00:10:26.100
And then you're finding out that they don't.
00:10:26.100 --> 00:10:30.940
And this comes up a lot for us, I think, in the improv learning process, at least.
00:10:31.180 --> 00:10:44.120
And remember that it doesn't really matter what you specifically have, it's just how you end up using whatever processing skills you have wired in, how these personally affect you.
00:10:44.120 --> 00:10:50.000
I find having this sort of very heightened or hyperphantasia thing quite useful.
00:10:50.000 --> 00:10:56.260
I deal with the negative parts of it, especially in my real life, and I just kind of leave it at that.
00:10:56.480 --> 00:11:01.880
This is a tool like all the other tools we have in our brains, really.
00:11:01.880 --> 00:11:10.600
And for most of my life, I used hyperphantasia, and I didn't care or think much about it until improv.
00:11:10.600 --> 00:11:17.680
So first of all, let's think about the outside of improv experience of hyperphantasia.
00:11:17.680 --> 00:11:23.840
So the very basic fundamental use of hyperphantasia is to just remember things.
00:11:24.120 --> 00:11:28.060
You'd be remembering going to your grandmother's house.
00:11:28.060 --> 00:11:38.400
You might kind of do a visual walkthrough of that, or remember a very specific, notable dinner that you went to, and you would just see those things in your mind's eye.
00:11:38.400 --> 00:11:47.940
And based on where you are on that spectrum would be the level of detail, perhaps, that you remember about those specific events.
00:11:47.940 --> 00:11:51.520
And you're going to be bringing in other memories as well when you think back.
00:11:51.720 --> 00:11:58.240
Visually, it will bring up the emotional memory, those other senses, what weather was like, what was it like outside.
00:11:58.240 --> 00:12:03.800
You're going to remember potentially what time of day it is based on what the light is, that kind of thing.
00:12:03.800 --> 00:12:13.000
And you might have other experiences, different ones that don't involve remembering the past, but things that happen in real time as well.
00:12:13.000 --> 00:12:24.520
Say you're having a conversation with a friend about aging, and you might actually kind of see yourself and your friend and your mind's eye in real time, aged.
00:12:24.520 --> 00:12:28.280
So it can be things that come up in conversation in real time.
00:12:28.280 --> 00:12:31.000
And that's a lot closer, of course, to improv.
00:12:31.000 --> 00:12:38.160
You can also just sit on the couch and place yourself in an environment that you know or you don't.
00:12:38.160 --> 00:12:43.440
The more relaxed you are, for me at least, the easier and better it seems to be.
00:12:43.440 --> 00:12:57.500
You know, or I might be out gardening and start kind of teaching a dance fitness class because I have my earbuds in and a song comes on and I will kind of, in my mind's eye, see a group of people in front of me, but they're actually in my garden.
00:12:57.500 --> 00:12:59.840
I can kind of see that in my mind.
00:12:59.840 --> 00:13:03.000
It's weird and it's very hard to explain.
00:13:03.000 --> 00:13:05.600
It's like there but not there.
00:13:05.600 --> 00:13:08.140
And all of this is really wired in.
00:13:08.140 --> 00:13:12.380
It's kind of like just feels like using a body part because it is really.
00:13:12.380 --> 00:13:18.720
I can remember all the way back to imagining things like this when I was in elementary school.
00:13:18.720 --> 00:13:20.800
You don't think it's real.
00:13:20.800 --> 00:13:22.840
That's the other thing to realize.
00:13:22.840 --> 00:13:24.780
Like I know this isn't real.
00:13:24.780 --> 00:13:26.480
I'm not, you know, hallucinating.
00:13:26.480 --> 00:13:28.060
I'm not actually seeing these things.
00:13:28.060 --> 00:13:32.100
I know that it's just something that I'm conjuring up mentally.
00:13:32.100 --> 00:13:38.500
And also hyperphantasia or heightened levels of fantasia is not all positive.
00:13:38.500 --> 00:13:40.780
This isn't some really cool trick.
00:13:40.780 --> 00:13:48.140
There are certainly drawbacks to having this, like photorealistic recall of very negative events in your life.
00:13:48.140 --> 00:13:57.640
Or things that you watch, like I can't watch violent realistic movies or shows or even moderately violent ones or graphic ones for this reason.
00:13:57.640 --> 00:14:06.820
Like the other night, I made it through about four minutes of four different movies that I tried to watch before I gave up and just went back to comedy.
00:14:06.820 --> 00:14:12.800
And I really wanted to watch those movies too and would have really enjoyed them if it just wasn't for those graphic elements.
00:14:13.140 --> 00:14:21.900
There's also issues around disassociation, distraction, overanalysis of scenarios, for making predictive assessments.
00:14:21.900 --> 00:14:25.680
Like some of these things are pretty good, like problem solving.
00:14:25.680 --> 00:14:33.600
But there's also bad elements around the distraction or just being too in your head for long periods of time of analysis.
00:14:33.600 --> 00:14:36.300
It's a big time waster at times.
00:14:36.300 --> 00:14:42.220
So in this next section, I'm going to detail what hyperphantasia is like for me in an improv sense.
00:14:42.220 --> 00:14:48.300
So doing scenes or doing exercises around improv, what that experience feels like.
00:14:48.300 --> 00:14:55.460
So I'm going to start off with probably the most basic, obvious, common sense one that you would expect, which is scene painting.
00:14:55.460 --> 00:15:06.580
So for example, if you wanted me to scene paint a basement, for example, I would start off by putting myself in that basement in my mind.
00:15:06.720 --> 00:15:12.260
And I would just describe what I see, what I feel and hear as well, perhaps.
00:15:12.260 --> 00:15:15.040
I don't really make it up as I go.
00:15:15.040 --> 00:15:19.520
In other words, I don't say a thing and then visualize or see it.
00:15:19.520 --> 00:15:25.380
I see those things first and then I describe them, kind of looking at them in my mind's eye.
00:15:25.380 --> 00:15:36.200
I don't know if most improvisers do it in that order, but I will again put myself in that room first, look around and then describe it.
00:15:36.340 --> 00:15:43.260
I can kind of just see the things in that room, down to a very specific detail, like as if I was really seeing it.
00:15:43.260 --> 00:15:47.380
And this room might be one that I've been in.
00:15:47.380 --> 00:15:49.820
It might be a room that I've never seen before.
00:15:49.820 --> 00:15:51.720
It's completely fictional.
00:15:51.720 --> 00:15:55.560
I haven't seen it even in a movie or visualized it before.
00:15:55.560 --> 00:15:56.580
It's brand new.
00:15:56.580 --> 00:16:01.160
But the most common one for me is kind of melding those two things together.
00:16:01.160 --> 00:16:08.260
Like it might be kind of a place I've possibly been or maybe even seen in a movie or something like that.
00:16:08.260 --> 00:16:10.720
And also kind of fictionalized.
00:16:10.720 --> 00:16:13.400
There's usually a lot of variation in there as well.
00:16:13.400 --> 00:16:19.740
Of course, if you're doing a scene or you're scene painting with other people, you're building something together.
00:16:19.740 --> 00:16:22.780
This is almost always the case, of course, in Improv.
00:16:22.780 --> 00:16:29.900
And in this case, the room will shift to be whatever that space becomes that you've all made together.
00:16:30.200 --> 00:16:44.180
So I will generally have a full, complete room, space, environment, character, depiction, whatever, initially, and then it will just keep changing as that new information is added to the environment.
00:16:44.180 --> 00:16:59.880
If something conflicts, like say I have a big table in my mind's eye in the middle of the room and then somebody says there's a rug and the room is empty in the center, that table just disappears and it immediately updates to whatever the other person has said.
00:16:59.880 --> 00:17:06.880
Again, I reckon that this is somewhat common, but that is how it is experienced for me with hyperphantasia.
00:17:06.880 --> 00:17:12.120
And that this is really happening during the scene is really the neat part of it.
00:17:12.120 --> 00:17:16.780
That's what I love about this, because this is all the stuff that you can use.
00:17:16.780 --> 00:17:17.840
It's helping you.
00:17:17.840 --> 00:17:22.520
You're mixing up what you actually see, what your mind sees.
00:17:22.520 --> 00:17:25.500
It's all changing as your scene partner does.
00:17:25.700 --> 00:17:27.840
And you're using all of that together.
00:17:27.840 --> 00:17:34.300
And I think really that focus through the changing is something that really kind of helps in a way.
00:17:34.300 --> 00:17:37.280
This, of course, can also be the somewhat harder part of it.
00:17:37.280 --> 00:17:40.980
Like, did you mention something that you saw?
00:17:40.980 --> 00:17:49.660
And was that thing established or is it something that your brain just added that's never been talked about before and should have been possibly?
00:17:49.660 --> 00:17:52.900
But then I realized at some point it just doesn't really matter.
00:17:53.380 --> 00:18:00.360
I used to be quite worried and concerned about that, but then I just realized it doesn't really matter.
00:18:00.360 --> 00:18:07.060
And I'm sure that there's some other aspects of it that make improv harder that I haven't considered yet.
00:18:07.060 --> 00:18:15.320
Or perhaps it's even a crutch that I'm using and some other version of memory recall might be better for some of these things.
00:18:15.320 --> 00:18:16.940
But who really knows?
00:18:16.940 --> 00:18:18.980
We're just using what we're given.
00:18:18.980 --> 00:18:20.320
We take these good parts.
00:18:20.440 --> 00:18:24.580
We acknowledge that there's often difficulties associated with them.
00:18:24.580 --> 00:18:28.780
And we just ultimately roll with all of it the best that we can.
00:18:28.780 --> 00:18:38.200
So the other aspect that's quite neat about hyperphantasia and improv is just the remembering of scenes that you've done.
00:18:38.200 --> 00:18:48.440
Of course, this isn't one of the important things other than really understanding and analyzing the improv that you've done to help you with future improv.
00:18:48.680 --> 00:18:59.380
So just like the note about remembering events that really happened in your real life, I can still place myself in certain scenes that I was in years ago.
00:18:59.380 --> 00:19:14.760
And I can kind of describe that environment down to the minute detail, like the time of day where the sun was in the sky and the level of humidity in the air, along with, you know, the color of the bricks on the wall in the alleyway.
00:19:14.760 --> 00:19:17.880
I have a lot of alleyway scenes at my head that I remember.
00:19:18.040 --> 00:19:18.900
I don't know why.
00:19:18.920 --> 00:19:26.000
Anyways, I can remember one of the very first scenes I did in Improv, the first one where Hyperphantasia really kicked in.
00:19:26.000 --> 00:19:28.300
It was one of those back alley scenes.
00:19:28.300 --> 00:19:30.320
I'm just remembering about it right now.
00:19:30.320 --> 00:19:35.560
And I can remember all of those elements, including what my character looked like.
00:19:35.560 --> 00:19:47.320
So if there is a really strong base reality, a very strong visual element built up, I'll remember that scene like I was actually in that imagined location.
00:19:47.580 --> 00:19:55.920
It's like a really strong or disturbing dream that you had and you were having that dream as you woke up.
00:19:55.920 --> 00:19:59.880
It's like that scene happened for real in your memory.
00:19:59.880 --> 00:20:04.020
And you can remember scenes like it actually took place for real.
00:20:04.020 --> 00:20:09.120
And I figure that's probably normal, maybe, for improvisers.
00:20:09.120 --> 00:20:12.600
It might just vary in the level of photorealism.
00:20:12.600 --> 00:20:20.360
And I also reckon that this is just a memory device that I lean on because it's something that I have in my real life.
00:20:20.360 --> 00:20:22.420
Of course, we're using the same memory.
00:20:22.420 --> 00:20:25.560
And it's just one of many possibilities.
00:20:25.560 --> 00:20:26.660
It's not the right one.
00:20:26.660 --> 00:20:27.940
It's not the best one.
00:20:27.940 --> 00:20:31.860
It's just one way of remembering information.
00:20:31.860 --> 00:20:47.360
Another odd aspect that I've noticed of remembering scenes with hyperphantasia, or at least the way that I do, is I most often remember the scenes as though it was shot by a camera from a different angle, like you're watching a movie.
00:20:47.360 --> 00:20:49.860
I'm not seeing it from the first person.
00:20:49.860 --> 00:20:55.260
I'm seeing it as though a camera shot it, so I can look at my character as well and see my character.
00:20:55.260 --> 00:21:07.120
This is something I actually do in my mind's eye all the time, to see my character, which helps me with the acting and getting into that character's persona and point of view and physicality and everything.
00:21:07.120 --> 00:21:18.960
And I figure that the difference between, say, hyperphantasia, what I have and other amounts of fantasia that people have is just how many visual details are present in these memories.
00:21:18.960 --> 00:21:25.280
And I figure a lot of the things that I remember are simply just not important or relevant.
00:21:25.280 --> 00:21:33.960
So in this next part, I'm going to talk about how hyperphantasia or visual processing is used in improv.
00:21:33.960 --> 00:21:40.240
Of course, it comes up in so many different areas of our practice, as I've already been talking about.
00:21:40.460 --> 00:21:50.620
Some of the areas that visual processing, visual memory, hyperphantasia affects the most are when, of course, we're setting up the base reality of a scene.
00:21:50.620 --> 00:22:00.960
We're setting up where it is, what that looks like, what's in the environment, what are we like as characters, because I use it as a character creation technique.
00:22:00.960 --> 00:22:05.840
All of those sorts of things are very important in the early stages of a scene.
00:22:05.840 --> 00:22:17.960
When we're dealing with emotions, especially if you have a problem connecting a word to a feeling, I find that hyperphantasia is absolutely essential for me in that regard.
00:22:17.960 --> 00:22:24.720
Like I've mentioned, I use hyperphantasia or visual techniques extensively when creating characters.
00:22:24.720 --> 00:22:29.180
I use it in memory and recall of details, visual and not visual.
00:22:29.180 --> 00:22:32.700
I use it for remembering names on occasion.
00:22:32.700 --> 00:22:35.480
I use it, and this is very rare.
00:22:35.480 --> 00:22:36.400
It just happens.
00:22:36.520 --> 00:22:37.460
I don't really use it.
00:22:37.460 --> 00:22:38.440
It just happens.
00:22:38.440 --> 00:22:47.740
For sorting out very complicated details in a scene, things can sort of materialize or appear during the scene visually in my mind's eye.
00:22:47.740 --> 00:22:54.100
Sometimes they disappear and change, but it actually will sometimes give me information that I can then verbally say.
00:22:54.100 --> 00:23:04.560
And I will cover some of these character creation memory and some of these other detail processing oriented elements in a later episode, so I can really focus on them.
00:23:04.800 --> 00:23:14.200
But I will continue to cover some of these basic usages in this episode, what it's like and maybe how you can strengthen some of these techniques.
00:23:14.200 --> 00:23:20.100
So Hyperphantasia has always been there in Improv for me and has been useful from the very beginning.
00:23:20.100 --> 00:23:28.820
I think that it turned up in the most strong, evident ways in scenes where perhaps they just kind of went well and I could relax.
00:23:28.820 --> 00:23:41.160
This might have been because of my scene partner, maybe they were much more experienced in kind of driving the scene and I could relax a little bit in it or they were adding a lot of the details or maybe it was just by chance.
00:23:41.160 --> 00:23:49.220
For example, some of my really early, strong visual scene memories are when I created a character visually.
00:23:49.220 --> 00:23:59.440
Then I would kind of more naturally, I guess, see the environment that that character was in maybe because I was already using those visual techniques by chance.
00:23:59.980 --> 00:24:04.080
Then as such, they sort of burn themselves into memory.
00:24:04.080 --> 00:24:08.920
So I could still recall them today using hyperphantasia.
00:24:08.920 --> 00:24:19.300
However, I probably didn't use much of the memory recall techniques that you can use hyperphantasia for within these early scenes.
00:24:19.300 --> 00:24:24.820
I think again, a lot of the clarity that I experienced was by accident.
00:24:24.820 --> 00:24:30.940
It was just sort of kicking in naturally or because of my scene partner, they were adding a lot of details.
00:24:30.940 --> 00:24:34.860
So I could see these things because they were describing them.
00:24:34.860 --> 00:24:42.620
So it is something that was there for me at the beginning and it was in use without any improv training.
00:24:42.620 --> 00:24:48.260
These were scenes that I did in GEMS before I had any improv instruction.
00:24:48.260 --> 00:24:52.820
I didn't know yes and I didn't know what denying things were.
00:24:52.820 --> 00:24:54.340
I didn't know how to add detail.
00:24:54.340 --> 00:24:55.540
I didn't know anything.
00:24:55.540 --> 00:24:58.180
So I had no improv training at that time.
00:24:58.440 --> 00:25:00.000
And these things were kicking in.
00:25:00.000 --> 00:25:02.400
So they don't require learning.
00:25:02.400 --> 00:25:03.500
They are just there.
00:25:03.500 --> 00:25:08.860
But there was some kind of setup that made these things stronger and work.
00:25:08.860 --> 00:25:14.820
So I believe that it's very useful and improv at any stage without any training.
00:25:14.820 --> 00:25:24.300
And as such, you can set yourself up to use this natural wiring more and more with reps and experience and training and learning.
00:25:24.620 --> 00:25:36.320
And so I didn't find hyperphantasia particularly useful, like really useful as a memory or as a character creation or skills tool until later on.
00:25:36.320 --> 00:25:45.180
I did use them to a certain extent for these things, but not really in a lot of a really conscious way, I wouldn't say.
00:25:45.180 --> 00:25:51.740
I didn't even realize that I could because I didn't even know how to create characters.
00:25:51.740 --> 00:25:53.480
I wasn't even really thinking about it.
00:25:53.580 --> 00:26:00.180
So I was just kind of on autopilot for those things until I actually started learning about improv.
00:26:00.180 --> 00:26:05.700
So those things of how to recall and kind of loosening up and relaxing.
00:26:05.700 --> 00:26:08.060
So you could really use hyperphantasia.
00:26:08.060 --> 00:26:20.880
That came along with learning, with noticing that that was even there, and then focusing on the hyperphantasia a little bit to use it more in an automated way.
00:26:21.300 --> 00:26:31.180
And again, being much more relaxed in a scene meant that those visual techniques could just appear and I could just kind of use them.
00:26:31.180 --> 00:26:35.840
So I'll get more into this creation of memory again in a future episode.
00:26:35.840 --> 00:26:45.680
So this is all very complicated to try to explain because we're talking about things that I can't show you and it's different between all of us.
00:26:45.680 --> 00:26:55.860
But I, at any rate, I found that as I got better at listening and remembering things in improv, all the hyperphantasia elements just got better.
00:26:55.860 --> 00:26:56.960
It got clearer.
00:26:56.960 --> 00:26:59.300
It was more frequent in place.
00:26:59.300 --> 00:27:03.880
Like the visual clarity itself was about the same.
00:27:03.880 --> 00:27:08.860
Like I could still see, for example, a book in the same amount of detail.
00:27:08.860 --> 00:27:17.100
But it was just easier to recall because you aren't focusing on all those other elements of improv that we have to remember.
00:27:17.100 --> 00:27:19.720
You can just think right back to that book.
00:27:19.980 --> 00:27:26.200
That you saw earlier and you can read the letters on the spine and remember what they looked like.
00:27:26.200 --> 00:27:32.640
Another thing in improv that this helps me a lot with is with emotions.
00:27:32.640 --> 00:27:34.040
Like I mentioned earlier.
00:27:34.040 --> 00:27:45.140
I'll talk about this more again in an episode about alexithymia but I also used hyperphantasia to work around the issue of applying words to emotions.
00:27:45.140 --> 00:27:48.800
Alexithymia is quite common amongst people with autism.
00:27:49.060 --> 00:27:59.960
I have some difficulty in the space and I think it sort of self-resolved almost accidentally finding hyperphantasia and flash memory.
00:27:59.960 --> 00:28:15.020
If there's an exercise for example where you need to apply an emotion word, you're given a word or you need to think of a word yourself or the very less common case where it's specifically endowed to you and you're not already expressing that.
00:28:15.260 --> 00:28:22.160
I'll figure out a place where I felt that thing or a thing I want to put into the scene.
00:28:22.160 --> 00:28:28.140
I'll quickly flash memory myself there and with the hyperphantasia I'll actually be there.
00:28:28.140 --> 00:28:32.720
I'll see everything, I'll feel it again and then I just take that feeling and go in the scene.
00:28:32.720 --> 00:28:40.960
Now this is not perfect and the scene, the emotions that I feel will absolutely change during the scene almost guaranteed.
00:28:41.060 --> 00:28:46.180
Like if I have to stay that same initial emotion through the whole scene it won't happen.
00:28:46.180 --> 00:28:55.300
So I won't hold that emotion very long like it's going to change when it's going to change but it seems to be enough to do the assignment.
00:28:55.300 --> 00:28:58.660
More on that in an episode on alexithymia.
00:28:58.660 --> 00:29:13.980
And just a side note out of potential interest for one or two of you out there, I actually didn't even know that emotional recall aspect was specifically part of hyperphantasia until after I was doing this in improv.
00:29:13.980 --> 00:29:31.180
I didn't even notice that I was doing this at all until a teacher sort of inquired why I didn't use one word to describe my emotion but instead used an entire paragraph to describe it because I never had a word.
00:29:31.360 --> 00:29:38.360
I just took myself to a place where I'm like, I felt really strong during this and then I just took that emotion and I had no word for it.
00:29:38.360 --> 00:29:42.400
So I had to describe it and they're like, well, it'd be a lot easier if you just thought of a word.
00:29:42.400 --> 00:29:44.640
And I'm like, you know, I can't.
00:29:44.640 --> 00:29:47.120
So I did this and I realized what I did.
00:29:47.120 --> 00:29:48.400
That's what I thought it in my head.
00:29:48.400 --> 00:29:53.180
Anyways, that was how I figured out what I was doing at all in improv.
00:29:53.180 --> 00:30:02.700
And then at some point after that, I ran into that they actually test for hyperphantasia using that specific thing around emotions.
00:30:02.700 --> 00:30:07.420
And then I thought, well, there's more confirmation that I probably do have this thing.
00:30:07.420 --> 00:30:21.080
So if you're not sure about how you might use visual processing in improv, I'll just provide some things that you can use to kind of check in with yourself and see what you're doing.
00:30:21.080 --> 00:30:27.560
And some of this is very similar to the tests that they do for hyperphantasia, but they're all very improv-y.
00:30:27.860 --> 00:30:29.740
So I think that you'll probably get it.
00:30:29.740 --> 00:30:33.640
Of course, the first thing you can do is just adding visuals.
00:30:33.640 --> 00:30:37.920
Of course, hyperphantasia tests are very improv-y.
00:30:37.920 --> 00:30:42.700
You're picking an object or an environment to describe.
00:30:42.700 --> 00:30:45.760
You will see that environment and you'll describe it.
00:30:45.760 --> 00:30:50.160
Now, also, I encourage you to try it the other way around.
00:30:50.160 --> 00:30:53.700
Describe something and then see what you see.
00:30:53.700 --> 00:30:58.140
Or I mean, this is just as simple as reading a book and seeing what appears in your mind.
00:30:58.140 --> 00:31:00.520
Can you see what the author is describing?
00:31:00.520 --> 00:31:09.320
Like I did an interview about hyperphantasia and the interviewer who has aphantasia asked me to essentially just scene paint a room.
00:31:09.320 --> 00:31:11.960
And I did a fully fictional room.
00:31:11.960 --> 00:31:16.980
I looked around the room, put myself in it and described it just like I do in improv.
00:31:16.980 --> 00:31:20.840
And that is kind of describing hyperphantasia.
00:31:20.840 --> 00:31:27.700
So on that note, try describing an area that you know really well already in real life.
00:31:27.700 --> 00:31:30.440
Not one that you're presently in, but somewhere else.
00:31:30.440 --> 00:31:39.940
And do a scene paint as you walk through that environment, say room to room in a building or around a community park down the street.
00:31:39.940 --> 00:31:43.620
Analyze what you see as you do this walk through.
00:31:43.620 --> 00:31:49.300
Describe it verbally and notice how much detail is there in your memory.
00:31:49.480 --> 00:31:54.620
Can you see everything in that environment as if you were there?
00:31:54.620 --> 00:31:56.620
Or what are those details like?
00:31:56.620 --> 00:31:58.320
Are they more shapes, et cetera?
00:31:58.320 --> 00:32:01.160
Just notice the level of detail that you notice.
00:32:01.160 --> 00:32:04.580
Now try this out, but in an area that's fictional this time.
00:32:04.580 --> 00:32:08.680
Try describing it as you go, saying things as you see them.
00:32:08.680 --> 00:32:13.480
Then flip it around and see if before you start describing it, what do you see?
00:32:13.480 --> 00:32:16.880
And how does each of these tasks, how does it feel to you?
00:32:17.180 --> 00:32:18.440
Does it feel really natural?
00:32:18.440 --> 00:32:20.300
Does it feel forced, etc.?
00:32:20.300 --> 00:32:27.580
So now in this next section, I'm going to talk a little bit about what you can do in improv scenes in this regard.
00:32:27.580 --> 00:32:31.800
So obviously, first of all, you can add details to that base reality.
00:32:31.800 --> 00:32:33.240
It's really going to set you up.
00:32:33.240 --> 00:32:35.700
But how are you doing that?
00:32:35.700 --> 00:32:43.260
What helps for me is to just pause and take a second right at the top of the scene, as opposed to just rushing in.
00:32:43.260 --> 00:32:49.560
It's natural to kind of rush in because you've got that adrenaline, a little bit of nerves, a little bit of anxiety going on.
00:32:49.560 --> 00:32:55.780
But if you just pause and take a second, notice where you're standing, notice maybe what you look like.
00:32:55.780 --> 00:33:06.540
Even if the scene has started, you can just take a beat and kind of think about these things, as opposed to rushing right in of mentioning things before you see them.
00:33:06.540 --> 00:33:18.380
So take a second to at least put yourself in an environment, even if you don't use it, even if that entire environment changes in a few lines, put yourself somewhere and see what that feels like.
00:33:18.380 --> 00:33:20.360
I think that works a little bit better.
00:33:20.360 --> 00:33:26.560
I haven't done this before and just rushed in and didn't really think about what it looks like.
00:33:27.000 --> 00:33:40.480
I find it a little bit better if at least you kind of have something to start with visually, again, even if it completely changes, which of course it will because your scene partner is going to immediately add things.
00:33:40.480 --> 00:33:45.680
They're going to respond or they're going to even initiate, and it might all change in a second.
00:33:45.680 --> 00:33:47.100
Of course, this is fine.
00:33:47.100 --> 00:33:47.720
It works.
00:33:47.720 --> 00:33:48.580
It's good.
00:33:48.580 --> 00:33:56.800
But I think there are some benefits of at least having a little bit of something to kind of ground yourself at that starting point.
00:33:56.800 --> 00:34:06.060
And if you can see your character as well at the very top of a scene or as soon as you're endowed, see what your character looks like.
00:34:06.060 --> 00:34:07.100
Take a moment.
00:34:07.100 --> 00:34:10.580
Treat it like it's a camera pointing at you.
00:34:11.160 --> 00:34:13.940
See what your character appears like.
00:34:13.940 --> 00:34:17.560
And this can help you so much in embodying that character.
00:34:17.560 --> 00:34:23.700
I find that the physicality comes in, voices come in, your body changes how you're holding it.
00:34:23.700 --> 00:34:29.380
And this can all help you develop that in the scene, which of course is a very important part.
00:34:29.380 --> 00:34:37.240
Even if you're playing someone like yourself, even if you look exactly like yourself, what do you look like today?
00:34:37.240 --> 00:34:38.120
Are you tired?
00:34:38.120 --> 00:34:39.020
Are you excited?
00:34:39.620 --> 00:34:40.800
Do you have your shoulders back?
00:34:40.800 --> 00:34:41.820
Are you hunched over?
00:34:41.820 --> 00:34:47.160
All of those things are very important in establishing everything at the top of the scene.
00:34:47.160 --> 00:34:52.840
I'll have more practical details about this, of course, in the next Hyperphantasia episode.
00:34:52.840 --> 00:34:56.520
But for now, visualize your character like it's a costume.
00:34:56.520 --> 00:35:00.780
You get all of these things for free, I find, for me at least this way.
00:35:00.780 --> 00:35:05.920
And I believe it's one of the most sort of forgotten elements or not communicated elements much.
00:35:06.180 --> 00:35:10.720
I haven't heard it communicated to me this sort of technique for character creation.
00:35:10.720 --> 00:35:14.000
And it's being the most important thing that I've done from day one.
00:35:14.000 --> 00:35:19.860
So I think that this benefit is probably one of the most useful ones of Hyperphantasia.
00:35:19.860 --> 00:35:25.780
Also, all of this will just get a lot better and a lot more useful when you can just let it happen.
00:35:25.780 --> 00:35:29.440
I tried forcing these things for a while, just for science.
00:35:29.440 --> 00:35:30.380
I was interested.
00:35:30.380 --> 00:35:34.300
I'm like, what can I do with this thing now that I realize I have it in my head?
00:35:34.520 --> 00:35:40.740
I wanted to see how much I could do and how much I could get for basically not free, if that makes sense.
00:35:40.740 --> 00:35:51.100
I tried things like forcing strings of numbers and I would like spray paint them against the sky if there was a sky in my mind's eye or a wall or whatever.
00:35:51.100 --> 00:35:51.940
And it worked.
00:35:51.940 --> 00:35:53.260
I mean, it technically worked.
00:35:53.260 --> 00:36:02.620
I could force the images there and I could remember long strings of numbers to do a callback, but it wasn't very long lasting in this case.
00:36:02.840 --> 00:36:05.860
And it just felt kind of gimmicky and annoying.
00:36:05.860 --> 00:36:07.720
And it was rarely useful.
00:36:07.720 --> 00:36:09.820
And I also didn't really enjoy it.
00:36:09.820 --> 00:36:11.600
It took the fun out of it too.
00:36:11.600 --> 00:36:16.320
So my recommendation now, if you get into this, is not to force it.
00:36:16.320 --> 00:36:17.740
Just try to notice it.
00:36:17.740 --> 00:36:26.160
And advancing your other skills in improv seemed to let you notice these things better and more often.
00:36:26.160 --> 00:36:34.460
And setting yourself up at the top of the scene just with strong visuals, which you're probably doing anyways, helps with all of this as well.
00:36:34.460 --> 00:36:37.300
And then you just don't need to force anything.
00:36:37.300 --> 00:36:48.680
So then when I did let things just sort of happen and flow, things then in hyperphantasia seemed to happen that were particularly useful.
00:36:48.680 --> 00:36:59.880
For example, for one scene, I had someone's name show up like behind them in this weird yellow gothic font letter, sort of behind them like titling in a movie.
00:36:59.880 --> 00:37:03.540
And that was very memorable and easy to recall.
00:37:03.540 --> 00:37:05.540
So I could remember their name in a scene.
00:37:05.540 --> 00:37:09.860
And I had some one point, it was really weird.
00:37:09.860 --> 00:37:15.260
I had like this grid of information that sort of arranged itself on a wall in a way.
00:37:15.260 --> 00:37:19.500
Like I wanted to say something and I couldn't really figure out this weird grouping.
00:37:19.620 --> 00:37:22.980
And so all the groupings appeared on the wall and then I could just read them out.
00:37:22.980 --> 00:37:24.820
And none of this was me doing it.
00:37:24.820 --> 00:37:26.120
Like I didn't do this.
00:37:26.120 --> 00:37:29.180
It just happened through hyperphantasia.
00:37:29.180 --> 00:37:32.060
So I don't know why or how.
00:37:32.060 --> 00:37:41.000
But it seemed to be related to just, you know, flowing with it and letting things happen as they are and just being relaxed and just going with it.
00:37:41.000 --> 00:37:46.380
So on that note, can you make yourself better at improv using this thing?
00:37:46.560 --> 00:37:52.800
And one of the really important things to remember about this is this is just your wiring.
00:37:52.800 --> 00:37:55.400
It's something that just shows up in brain scans.
00:37:55.400 --> 00:38:00.740
This isn't an impairment if you don't have a strong visual imagination.
00:38:00.740 --> 00:38:09.440
Everybody is just doing improv differently using the particular tools for recall and seeing the environment in different ways.
00:38:09.760 --> 00:38:18.620
As such, I don't really feel that anything I've described about visual processing in this episode is specifically trainable.
00:38:18.620 --> 00:38:25.940
Like you can't get better at this thing at whatever spot on the spectrum that you are.
00:38:25.940 --> 00:38:30.640
It's just all automatic, like a reflex, as far as I can tell.
00:38:30.640 --> 00:38:38.600
Like the thing that I was talking about about forcing that would be me trying to get better at this particular cognitive thing.
00:38:38.600 --> 00:38:47.400
And all I've noticed so far is just getting better at improv skills helps me just let it do what it already does.
00:38:47.400 --> 00:38:51.100
So it feels like it's getting better, but I don't think it is.
00:38:51.100 --> 00:38:52.820
I think it's no change.
00:38:52.820 --> 00:38:56.120
The only change is in the improv skills around it.
00:38:56.120 --> 00:39:13.840
And of course, you can focus like I'm going to add some more details about what I already see to the scene to help me just visually see everything a little bit better or clear, but it's not really changing the hyperphantasia at all, it's just improving your improv.
00:39:13.840 --> 00:39:25.680
So on that note, I do believe that being aware of hyperphantasia helps you notice it and notice how you are functioning in the scene better.
00:39:25.680 --> 00:39:29.520
And that helps you just use it, just being aware of it helped me.
00:39:29.820 --> 00:39:35.460
And then your improv skills around the hyperphantasia itself will change.
00:39:35.460 --> 00:39:40.400
And then everything together feels a little bit faster and easier or maybe better.
00:39:40.400 --> 00:39:52.620
So you can set yourself up and you can set the scene up for a bit more success, just being knowledgeable of your visual processing, your skills around the hyperphantasia around it change.
00:39:52.620 --> 00:40:03.420
And this is kind of how all of neurodivergence kind of seems to be, because it's our wiring and it's what we're doing around our wiring that makes the difference.
00:40:03.420 --> 00:40:07.940
Because there's just so many darn variables involved in this, aren't there?
00:40:07.940 --> 00:40:14.100
So this episode is yet another example of I could be completely wildly inaccurate.
00:40:14.100 --> 00:40:23.260
And I haven't heard most of the stuff described by anyone and that I haven't heard anyone specifically mention hyperphantasia or aphantasia.
00:40:23.260 --> 00:40:27.700
This just happens to be my analysis of how I do things.
00:40:27.960 --> 00:40:34.200
And describing visuals and seeing them is something most of us do all the time.
00:40:34.200 --> 00:40:37.500
So you all probably do a lot of this already.
00:40:37.500 --> 00:40:44.520
But I hope something in this episode will be useful to you or someone else or someone you teach or coach perhaps.
00:40:44.520 --> 00:40:49.800
And I've run a few exercises in my classes that seem to resonate in this particular space.
00:40:49.800 --> 00:40:53.260
And I will describe them in the next episode on this topic.
00:40:53.260 --> 00:40:54.140
I know I've said that a lot.
00:40:54.300 --> 00:40:58.140
Maybe some of these ideas will give you some things to try in your own practice.
00:40:58.140 --> 00:41:06.660
And from that, you'll find out something completely new and different than all of this that will work for you specifically.
00:41:06.660 --> 00:41:08.020
And that's what we're after.
00:41:08.020 --> 00:41:13.100
You'll discover more about the way your unique and wonderful brain works in improv.
00:41:13.100 --> 00:41:15.340
And that might be kind of neat.
00:41:15.340 --> 00:41:18.420
So I didn't want this episode to be this long, but here we are.
00:41:18.660 --> 00:41:19.500
And it is.
00:41:19.500 --> 00:41:23.260
So I will keep the plugs and the M bit quick.
00:41:23.260 --> 00:41:28.260
I'm going to have a random observation this week from my Neurodiversity friends out there after the plugs.
00:41:28.260 --> 00:41:29.120
But first, the plugs.
00:41:29.120 --> 00:41:39.920
Let's check out World's Greatest Improv School for great classes and improv at all levels, including many very unique advanced workshops in person and online.
00:41:39.920 --> 00:41:46.400
Many of the classes are online, so you can take them from anywhere and you can take those skills back to your home theaters if you want.
00:41:46.720 --> 00:41:48.920
wgimprovschool.com.
00:41:48.920 --> 00:41:53.480
I also have a site dedicated to online improv, podcasts and live streams.
00:41:53.480 --> 00:41:56.160
This one's my site, flatimprov.com.
00:41:56.160 --> 00:42:00.160
You can find that in the newsletter that I put out every second week.
00:42:00.160 --> 00:42:02.100
Again, flatimprov.com.
00:42:02.100 --> 00:42:07.760
And this podcast is at Substack and has a weekly newsletter attached to it.
00:42:07.760 --> 00:42:10.540
So you can get that if you want as well.
00:42:10.540 --> 00:42:16.760
You can subscribe to that and learn more about how to get your voice on this podcast as well at flatimprov.com/substack.
00:42:18.420 --> 00:42:20.020
Thank you for listening.
00:42:20.020 --> 00:42:23.380
And hey, I've got a random observation for the weirdos out there.
00:42:23.380 --> 00:42:26.060
If you're not neurodivergent, you don't got to listen to this.
00:42:26.060 --> 00:42:30.960
This is a new bit I'm adding for the weirdos or I guess any of you who are not sick of my voice yet.
00:42:30.960 --> 00:42:33.500
This is just a random thought that seems kind of weird.
00:42:33.500 --> 00:42:43.500
So how many of you out there stim music like listening to the same song over and over and over again and you find that like nice and relaxing or good in some way?
00:42:43.760 --> 00:42:51.580
I do and with the right songs, only some songs and I love like the loop, the repeat button with a little number one on it.
00:42:51.580 --> 00:43:05.020
Like I love it and I've been like listening to this one song by an indie artist and I don't know, I've probably listened to this song like I don't know, 800 times in the past couple of weeks, like a lot of times, too many times.
00:43:05.020 --> 00:43:12.440
I wonder because this is a very small time indie artist, like I always wonder do they notice like a stats bump on that one song?
00:43:12.620 --> 00:43:23.280
And like how big do does the artist have to be to not notice a weird stat on one song that you've like looped 876 times or whatever over the past couple of weeks?
00:43:23.280 --> 00:43:29.260
Or does like Spotify somehow like negate that as spam and like doesn't count the numbers?
00:43:29.260 --> 00:43:31.540
Like that seems like a good description.
00:43:31.540 --> 00:43:33.980
I'm self-spamming myself with this song.
00:43:33.980 --> 00:43:34.280
All right.
00:43:34.280 --> 00:43:35.760
Anyways, this got really weird.
00:43:35.760 --> 00:43:36.580
That's all.
00:43:36.580 --> 00:43:39.140
See you next week and now we're done.