Lastly, I know you may be thinking, well, Paul, you missed three planets.

Well, I was talking about the way the ancients looked up at the planets.

I know in modern astrology they have worked in the use of Neptune, Uranus and Pluto and they have their own significations.

But in terms of astrology, these three are still very new.

We have ideas of what their significations could be, but the ones I spoke on have come from looking up and then down for thousands of years.

We've only been looking up at the last three for maybe a little bit over a hundred and think they found Neptune 175 years ago.

We may have a little more observant to do when it comes to those three.

Yeah, and we, for some reason we're not looking up, we're kind of just looking into this box that we have in front of us.

Yeah, yeah.

So that was my presentation on the planets.

Nice.

Do any questions, anything you wanna.

I'm curious to know if, Let me see, what was I, I had a question earlier.

It's gonna come back to me, but I'm curious like, I'm kind of curious to know if like what the additional three planets, like, do they change anything from like the original seven?

Like because there's new, there's three new planets.

Like would it change in a, I guess like in, I don't know, in a very specific way.

Like some of the significations of those seven planets, like does the arrangement kind of change?

Well, the reason I didn't present them is because I'm kind of leaning.

The presentation I just gave was more of a Hellenistic point of view.

And Hellenistic astrologers really don't use those three.

That's why.

But I also, like, I dabble with the modern, that's where I started at with the modern astrology.

So I don't really poo poo those three positions just yet.

I was just trying to present what the ancients looked at.

That's why I said, hey, maybe we need to.

We, even though we think we know what these planets signify, we still have some more observation to do.

I agree.

I just, I think that, I mean just the way that I see it, even though, like, even though it might seem like I'm technically debunking astrology, which I'm not because I also practice astrology, but the way I'm thinking about it is sort of like outside of the box, I guess, in the way that, you know, the ancients used to look up at the stars and they would only see seven planets.

But those other three had to be in there somewhere.

In there.

Yes.

I guess I know what you kind of getting at.

Actually I was just watching a.

Listening to a podcast and a guy was talking about that, and we can't actually, like, for instance, they have charts from way back, but we can't actually go pull them charts back up and then try to place Neptune and all of that into those charts because maybe that society wasn't ready for that consciousness yet.

Oh, okay, I like that.

So.

So 175 years ago, when we found Neptune, maybe us as a collective was just being ready for Neptune consciousness to be interjected into the situation.

Which is interesting because Neptune's supposed to represent the hidden, right?

Yeah.

So we discovered that there was something hidden in us.

Yeah, yeah.

And actually that would.

That has something to do with why they put it in Pisces and stuff like that.

But one of the re.

The way they have it now, it fall.

It doesn't make sense.

In the calculations of how the ancients lined up all the planets, the significations, the malefics and benefics and all that stuff, everything had male, female, yin yang, all that stuff.

And with, with the introduction of these three.

That's why, that's why I'm saying we haven't.

They haven't been around long enough.

I mean, how long is.

How long have we known about Pluto?

Not that long.

Exactly.

It's been even less than Neptune, right?

Yes, I think, I think, I don't

even think it's been 200 years because

technically now Neptune was 175.

175.

And then Uranus was after that.

And then Pluto, I think Pluto was like 19, like 10 or something like that somewhere around there.

So.

Okay, wait, because then.

Well, hold on, because I actually did not know that.

I didn't know that Pluto was discovered way after all the other ones.

So even though Pluto was technically discovered in the 19th, the early 1900s with astrology, still today, people will pull up the charts of the United States and will include Pluto in it.

And I was talking about the chart from like 1774 when we had the independence.

Pluto was February 18, 1930.

In astrology or like just, just we

found a planet, period.

We found out, oh, there's a planet out there.

And that was in 1930.

That'd be an interesting.

It actually hasn't been even 100 years yet.

I know, that's what I'm saying.

That would be an interesting follow up for you to do because in the charts of the United States as a nation, taken from, like, the original, like, when they signed the Declaration of Independence or whatever.

You know, people, astrologers, continue to pull up Pluto in that chart, but technically, Pluto hadn't been discovered till 200 years after that.

Yes.

So technically, they're not really supposed to be using it in the chart because it may not have been part of collective consciousness yet.

So technically, now, in the next couple of years, when Pluto transitions into Aquarius, that is when the US Will really feel that shakeup, depending on the type

of astrology you follow.

Well, yeah, yeah, yeah, of course.

But I'm just thinking about it in, like, terms of, like, like, when we signed the Declaration, the Declaration of Independence, you know, Pluto wasn't around.

So, you know, everybody talking about the.

The US Having its Pluto return and its Pluto return, that's technically false.

Yeah.

According to this guy who was on that podcast who was one of the.

I think his name was.

I forgot his name.

But he.

He is one of the original people who brought Hellenistic astrology back.