It's the space between Christmas and New Year where time, at least whatever concept of
time you have, is weird.
2
00:00:10,376 --> 00:00:21,866
Today's post is a collection of thoughts about memory and goal setting and some
interesting research that is starting to merge in the field of psychology.
3
00:00:21,866 --> 00:00:23,487
I hope you enjoy.
4
00:00:24,709 --> 00:00:27,983
So in psychological terms, it makes...
5
00:00:27,983 --> 00:00:33,626
total sense that the way we perceive the calendar weeks gets distorted over this festive
period.
6
00:00:33,626 --> 00:00:44,191
You know, our routines are shifting and changing and the things that anchor the start and
end of our weeks, the ebb and the flow, they're all modelled up or not happening at all.
7
00:00:44,692 --> 00:00:55,884
There's also something about the countdown or the Advent to Christmas that builds up
anticipation only for it to be followed by this waiting period, this liminal period.
8
00:00:55,884 --> 00:00:59,396
before the universal fresh start of the new year.
9
00:00:59,537 --> 00:01:02,659
And this probably distorts our thinking.
10
00:01:03,200 --> 00:01:07,843
The space in between always makes me think of a roller coaster ride.
11
00:01:07,843 --> 00:01:15,548
But research shows that how you are perceiving this time and how I'm perceiving this time
are likely to be very, very different.
12
00:01:16,449 --> 00:01:23,084
The most obvious way in which we start to perceive time is through physical and cultural
constructs.
13
00:01:23,222 --> 00:01:30,587
If you live in a Western culture, then you'll be used to calendars and watches, that
electronic timekeeping.
14
00:01:30,787 --> 00:01:33,689
Also, we have this Monday to Friday working week.
15
00:01:33,689 --> 00:01:36,591
Perhaps you go to park run every Saturday.
16
00:01:36,631 --> 00:01:41,794
These are all things that influence the way we think about time.
17
00:01:42,135 --> 00:01:52,221
And how we visualise future time is intriguing because I always assumed that everyone had
a big long virtual timeline in their head.
18
00:01:52,262 --> 00:01:53,352
I've got one.
19
00:01:53,504 --> 00:01:57,216
It's about to curve back on itself because we're starting a new year.
20
00:01:57,216 --> 00:02:00,618
And I can see those months ahead quite clearly.
21
00:02:00,618 --> 00:02:04,900
There's a linear timeline, which is punctuated by some memorable dates.
22
00:02:04,900 --> 00:02:08,522
And these, you know, occur like road signs as I approach them.
23
00:02:08,522 --> 00:02:16,787
Valentine's Day in February, a 10K race in March, and a family holiday that I'm really
excited about going on in July.
24
00:02:17,688 --> 00:02:20,589
But perhaps your mental imagery is more circular.
25
00:02:20,589 --> 00:02:22,730
Or does it look like a calendar grid?
26
00:02:23,128 --> 00:02:29,622
There are cases of people who have really vivid memories and visualizations.
27
00:02:29,622 --> 00:02:35,545
And these people can also experience seeing words and sounds of specific colors and tastes
too.
28
00:02:35,545 --> 00:02:39,437
And their calendars appear as very vivid things.
29
00:02:39,437 --> 00:02:42,209
They're like the real thing hanging on the wall.
30
00:02:42,269 --> 00:02:46,891
And they can describe flicking through them mentally.
31
00:02:47,312 --> 00:02:50,734
But I suspect that my logical brain is less visual.
32
00:02:51,374 --> 00:02:59,197
20 years of managing very complex projects has contributed for sure the way that I think
about a timeline in my head.
33
00:02:59,297 --> 00:03:04,700
Although I think I've probably always seen time as a linear thing.
34
00:03:04,900 --> 00:03:14,805
So much to their bewilderment, I asked my mom and sister via WhatsApp how they thought
about time to see what our differences were.
35
00:03:14,805 --> 00:03:17,974
My mom sees like a wall calendar.
36
00:03:17,974 --> 00:03:23,616
and she thinks of months as numbers, so September is nine, and that feels very logical.
37
00:03:23,677 --> 00:03:32,940
And my sister was more linked to a visual representation of an electronic calendar, an
Outlook calendar.
38
00:03:33,121 --> 00:03:36,902
So went and asked more people, and I said, well, how do you think about time?
39
00:03:36,902 --> 00:03:44,425
Expecting somebody somewhere to say, yes, I've got a big timeline in my head, Leela, and
it's just like yours, except they didn't.
40
00:03:45,166 --> 00:03:45,986
So.
41
00:03:46,734 --> 00:03:53,234
I started to wonder about how that we think about or how we construct our visual future.
42
00:03:53,454 --> 00:03:57,874
And the psychology and research in this area is just fascinating.
43
00:03:58,254 --> 00:04:07,814
know, as psychologists, we know that our ability to think about the future is possibly
linked to our autobiographical memory.
44
00:04:07,814 --> 00:04:14,582
And this is the stuff that stores all those key things in our life, things like learning
to ride your bike.
45
00:04:14,582 --> 00:04:17,284
a first kiss or a family holiday.
46
00:04:17,284 --> 00:04:22,187
They're all things that are stickier than the average everyday event.
47
00:04:22,588 --> 00:04:30,594
And what's more, we know that we have fewer of these events as we get older because we
have less novel experiences.
48
00:04:30,974 --> 00:04:35,998
It leads to a really interesting phenomenon called the reminiscence bump.
49
00:04:35,998 --> 00:04:41,356
This is why the nineties will always be the best decade for me for music.
50
00:04:41,356 --> 00:04:43,759
I had more novel experiences during the 90s.
51
00:04:43,759 --> 00:04:45,061
I went to my first gig.
52
00:04:45,061 --> 00:04:46,192
I had my first kiss.
53
00:04:46,192 --> 00:04:47,913
I met my husband.
54
00:04:47,954 --> 00:04:54,882
So there's a lot all kind of associated with that visual and physical memory that I have.
55
00:04:57,048 --> 00:05:03,140
There's also a theory that this reminiscence helps us to remember more details of an event
too.
56
00:05:03,141 --> 00:05:14,655
So we know that when we want to memorise something for an exam, for example, that a delay
in a break in remembering is really helpful in consolidating our memory.
57
00:05:14,655 --> 00:05:18,247
It helps us to be more accurate in the retrieval of them.
58
00:05:18,247 --> 00:05:22,989
So that's why you might see that exam revision techniques have breaks built in.
59
00:05:22,989 --> 00:05:26,124
It's not because our brains get tired, more that
60
00:05:26,124 --> 00:05:32,318
the process of remembering and not forgetting is aided by having those breaks.
61
00:05:33,419 --> 00:05:45,907
But above all of this, there are lots of individual differences and environmental things
that are happening which can change the way that we remember and forget memories.
62
00:05:46,268 --> 00:05:55,534
When I had to memorize an essay on cognition for my psychology qualification, I decided to
pick out research on drunk people.
63
00:05:55,574 --> 00:06:06,842
I thought it'd be slightly amusing and scientific and I thought, well, if I rehearse this
information and it's interesting, it will stick in my head longer.
64
00:06:07,062 --> 00:06:08,323
And it worked.
65
00:06:08,763 --> 00:06:14,097
It's important for us to understand how credible the memory is after consuming alcohol.
66
00:06:14,097 --> 00:06:18,750
So there was an applied reason for wanting to research that too.
67
00:06:19,771 --> 00:06:23,938
In witness testimony in the UK at least, police procedures
68
00:06:23,938 --> 00:06:28,400
don't encourage the formal interviewing of witnesses who are visibly drunk.
69
00:06:28,620 --> 00:06:36,803
They're not routinely breathalysed because there's no criminality for being drunk, really,
unless you're being disorderly at the same time.
70
00:06:36,924 --> 00:06:45,487
Yet when asked, jurors and judges support the view that under the influence testimony is
less credible than a sober witness.
71
00:06:45,487 --> 00:06:47,788
But the lab studies don't show that.
72
00:06:47,788 --> 00:06:52,550
The lab studies show consistently that memory recall is unaffected.
73
00:06:52,588 --> 00:06:55,359
by a level of intoxication.
74
00:06:55,359 --> 00:07:07,944
Now, I suppose there is a slight difference here between being intoxicated at the limit,
which is too much for driving in the UK and heading towards a total blackout.
75
00:07:07,944 --> 00:07:11,286
Obviously, the more you drink, the less you will remember.
76
00:07:11,286 --> 00:07:16,048
But the quality of the memories that you do form seems to be quite good.
77
00:07:16,848 --> 00:07:21,624
So it's not an unfounded bias for these judges and jurors to distrust the
78
00:07:21,624 --> 00:07:25,075
testimony of people who were drunk at the time.
79
00:07:25,236 --> 00:07:30,558
We know that drugs in general impair the way that episodic memories are stored.
80
00:07:30,558 --> 00:07:39,882
But interestingly, a body of research suggests that it's the quantity rather than the
quality of memories that's impacted when drunk, at least up to a point.
81
00:07:40,963 --> 00:07:48,066
Intoxicated witnesses are more selective of the memories they report because perhaps they
hold back.
82
00:07:48,066 --> 00:07:49,297
the vague details.
83
00:07:49,297 --> 00:07:55,790
They want to report less than the sober person because they might not remember as much.
84
00:07:56,190 --> 00:08:03,644
But another thing goes on because alcohol also dampens anxiety and when we're in an
anxious state we remember more details.
85
00:08:03,644 --> 00:08:08,797
So perhaps there's a second effect with alcohol which means that we just don't remember as
much.
86
00:08:08,797 --> 00:08:11,978
Again it's that quantity over quality conversation.
87
00:08:13,760 --> 00:08:24,237
It makes sense, though, that the scientific facts are blurry around the impact of alcohol
on memory, because after all, it's tricky to conduct experiments on drunk people.
88
00:08:24,237 --> 00:08:26,779
They don't follow instructions well.
89
00:08:27,039 --> 00:08:32,743
And there's a question of what is an ethically safe level of intoxication?
90
00:08:33,063 --> 00:08:35,945
How does that relate to the real world as well?
91
00:08:36,085 --> 00:08:43,150
And how suggestible are people and how might they be, you know, manipulated by unethical
researchers?
92
00:08:43,704 --> 00:08:54,277
For this reason, there are relatively few in the field or pub psychology experiments that
look at the experience of being drunk on memory recall in real life.
93
00:08:54,357 --> 00:08:58,958
However, for my exam prep, I did find an interesting study.
94
00:08:58,958 --> 00:09:02,799
And this was at the Maastricht University in the Netherlands.
95
00:09:02,799 --> 00:09:08,961
So they recruited people who were drinking and half of those people were questioned
immediately.
96
00:09:09,321 --> 00:09:12,442
And the other half were questioned in a delayed way.
97
00:09:12,810 --> 00:09:16,932
everybody was questioned later on around their recall.
98
00:09:16,932 --> 00:09:22,254
And the results of this study suggested that immediate recall is better for accuracy.
99
00:09:22,354 --> 00:09:28,896
And that has an implication, doesn't it, for them, the practice of waiting for someone to
sober up before questioning them.
100
00:09:29,997 --> 00:09:40,852
There are many, many reasons to be dubious about research that happens in pubs, but it is
interesting to think about the way in which our life events and episodes need both time to
101
00:09:40,852 --> 00:09:42,102
percolate
102
00:09:42,126 --> 00:09:47,786
and be recalled and when they don't, and also how we remember and forget things.
103
00:09:48,566 --> 00:09:52,286
And you might be wondering, well, why are you telling me all of this?
104
00:09:52,526 --> 00:10:00,686
Well, this liminal space between Christmas and New Year's is a natural reflection and
reminiscence point for humans.
105
00:10:00,686 --> 00:10:11,526
And it leads into a big collective and cultural fresh start of the new year where we're
encouraged and motivated to set new goals and try new things.
106
00:10:12,322 --> 00:10:20,786
But here's the thing, writing down goals and visualizing outcomes are very effective ways
of using our memory to anticipate the future.
107
00:10:20,907 --> 00:10:24,989
Some people have highly superior autobiographical memories.
108
00:10:24,989 --> 00:10:26,059
That's a real term.
109
00:10:26,059 --> 00:10:36,055
know, there's a group of people like super smellers or super tasters who have this
elevated imagination and visualization of future scenarios.
110
00:10:36,055 --> 00:10:42,508
And we're really interested in those people and we're just starting to understand how that
visualization works.
111
00:10:42,690 --> 00:10:51,066
Before that group of people, there's also another group who don't or can't visualise the
time or future events at all.
112
00:10:51,066 --> 00:10:56,490
And then we have people with different time perspectives.
113
00:10:56,490 --> 00:11:02,204
This might be something you more readily associate with autism or ADHD.
114
00:11:02,204 --> 00:11:07,247
And it alters the way in which people think about and approach and deal with events.
115
00:11:07,888 --> 00:11:12,030
So the research in all of these areas is very fascinating.
116
00:11:12,184 --> 00:11:18,674
and of course not covered by that pub experiment, with no way of knowing which category
did those people fit into.
117
00:11:18,674 --> 00:11:20,357
Is it a category?
118
00:11:20,698 --> 00:11:31,052
And I predict that over the next decade, the way in which we start to set goals and
resolutions is going to be more impacted by the types of research that's going on around
119
00:11:31,052 --> 00:11:35,164
the different ways we think about motivation and visual cues.
120
00:11:35,384 --> 00:11:40,106
We're only just starting to understand the difference between those who do
121
00:11:40,106 --> 00:11:42,867
and don't see images in their mind's eye.
122
00:11:43,388 --> 00:11:51,673
In fact, it was only this year that we found the first biological evidence of that
difference in measuring pupil dilation.
123
00:11:52,253 --> 00:12:03,170
My hope is that we see more research that explores divergent ways of processing because
the types of people I have coached in the past and continue to work with are not
124
00:12:03,170 --> 00:12:07,202
necessarily what we would call one type of thinker or
125
00:12:07,202 --> 00:12:10,829
they don't perceive time in a very standard way.
126
00:12:11,012 --> 00:12:12,435
What is the standard?
127
00:12:12,435 --> 00:12:17,386
I'd always assumed that everybody saw a timeline when they thought about time.
128
00:12:18,944 --> 00:12:28,797
If you are thinking about what you'd like to achieve this year, I think it's worth
reflecting on the type of techniques that are going to work with the way that you
129
00:12:28,797 --> 00:12:30,177
experience time.
130
00:12:30,177 --> 00:12:34,198
And that starts with thinking, well, how do I experience time?
131
00:12:34,718 --> 00:12:39,219
Perhaps mood boards will excite your vivid visual memory.
132
00:12:39,259 --> 00:12:42,140
Timelines might thrill your logical brain.
133
00:12:42,140 --> 00:12:43,640
Welcome to the club.
134
00:12:44,021 --> 00:12:49,102
Or do you need to hear or read something that sits with your narrative in your head?
135
00:12:50,670 --> 00:13:00,030
If you have got a big goal for 2023, last year I wrote about the layering effect of goals
and what that does, it gets you to think about the recent past.
136
00:13:00,030 --> 00:13:04,530
So this is one way to avoid that reminiscence bump when you're setting a goal.
137
00:13:04,530 --> 00:13:11,490
It might help you set something that is achievable rather than something that's less
realistic from a younger you.
138
00:13:12,230 --> 00:13:16,358
And I always recommend the psychologist Katie Milkman.
139
00:13:16,460 --> 00:13:26,907
Her research is centred around habits and habits for change, but she's also written quite
extensively, and you'll see this in the newspapers over the next couple of weeks when she
140
00:13:26,907 --> 00:13:32,600
does interviews, about fresh starts, when they do and when they don't work.
141
00:13:33,401 --> 00:13:35,002
Have a happy new year.