Foreign.

Welcome to another episode of the Secular

Foxhole podcast.

Today.

Our guest is Stuart Margolis.

I hope I pronounced that correct.

You did he.

And he is affiliated with the Iron Ran Institute.

Hello, Stuart.

Hi. I should clarify, I, I was, I recently retired.

Oh, I see, I see, I see.

So I'm totally just speaking for myself here.

Not very well.

Very well.

The reason I had you on is you wrote a great substack article called where to Find the New

Intellectuals.

And I think a lot of people, not just Objectivists, are wondering where, yeah, where

can we find kindred souls, kindred spirits? And because it's, I believe the society is

becoming more tribal and.

Absolutely.

So can you delve into the gist of your article for me?

Yeah, I, I, I'd be happy to.

Yeah. I think that our, our society is becoming more tribal and I think more anti

intellectual.

There's always been an anti intellectual

streak in America, but I think it's getting worse.

So I think it's a real challenge to figure out where, you know, Ayn Rand coined the term the

new intellectual, and one of her nonfiction collections is titled that and you know, long

as I said, I worked for the Ayn Rand Institute previously for many, many years, and one of

their primary goals is to reach new intellectuals and also create new

intellectuals.

That's their Ayn Rand University program at all.

And I think certainly in the initial years of the Institute, and I think the Objectivist

movement in general, sort of by default, we always assumed that those new intellectuals

would be found on the right.

We would, you know, go to conservative groups to speak, we would target conservatives for,

for donations.

But increasingly, I think, over the last 20 years, and especially over the last 10, this

anti intellectualism on the right, I think, makes it increasingly difficult to find those

people where we had hoped to find them.

And I think that it would behoove us to look elsewhere to look, I hate to use the word on

the left, but just places other than the right, people that don't think of themselves

as conservative or don't think of themselves as on the right or Republican.

I think there's a lot of people that are independent or maybe even, you know, did vote

Democrat or whatever, but they, they have a certain intellectual curiosity that we should

be tapping into because Ayn Rand is incredibly intellectual and appeals to a wide variety of

people, not just conservatives.

Stuart, have you looked into the work of Robert Tracynski about symposium and the

liberal, the classical liberals?

Yeah, and I think he's absolutely right.

I think there are still, it's a small group, but there are still classical liberals that

would consider themselves on the left, would consider themselves liberal.

But at this point in the culture, I think objectivists have a lot more in common with

them than with say a MAGA Republican who has bought into this cult of personality.

And you know, when you try and discuss ideas, they just, they're unable to.

Yeah, and I always been against anarchist and people who are against the state

as such.

I'm for the state, but a minimal state

protecting our individual rights.

But how about the small l libertarians or that

are not anarchists if there are anywhere left?

I'm sure there are some, unfortunately.

I think the libertarian movement as such.

Have they been cooped by like a MAGA version there too or.

Yeah, they really have.

From my understanding there's a lot of people

that have decided, well, we have to have a strong authority figure to get to where we

want to go, which makes no sense to me.

I'm working on an article for my substack right now which is quoting the famous Vietnam

War era quote, we had to destroy the town in order to save it.

And I think that's kind of the mentality.

It's like, well, we have to destroy all of our liberties in order to get to a free society.

And I don't think it works that way.

Yeah, I think that record is spotty at best.

Haha.

Well, let's see, let me jump around my

questions here.

Sure.

And I didn't have this written down, but I just thought of this a little while ago.

Iran is, let's just say she's in the Aristotelian school of thought, if you will.

Y and Aristotle wrote on friendship.

Do you, do you know specifically or in general

what he did say about friendship or.

I have read a little bit and I liked it, but I, I certainly.

It was long enough ago.

I, I wouldn't dare to.

But I think he did have a very positive and correct essentially view of friendship.

Yeah. I think I point our viewers or listeners to Aristotle's views on friendship

for that.

But I think that you talked about there's such

epistemological confusion today about left, right, liberal, conservative, freedom,

everything.

And I think that's a deliberate assault by progressives.

You have the same view or what is your view?

I mean, I think there has been a concerted attack on.

Yeah. On reason and on and epistemology.

The irony to me is it absolutely came from the left, from the progressives, from, from, you

know, what we would identify as left part of the spectrum.

But Many of those tactics have now been adopted by the right.

So there was always problems with the left right divide, trying to classify Ayn Rand.

I mean she was vehemently in favor of a woman's right to abortion.

She was anti draft.

She, you know, she did not share all the typical conservative views of her day.

She still classified herself as being on the right because at the time, at least when she

started writing that they were the more pro capitalist, pro freedom side.

I don't know that that's true anymore.

I wish it were, but from the evidence I'm

seeing, I don't see that.

Yeah, I agree, I agree.

I think that especially the Fox News types, they're blaming liberalism for all of today's

problems when it's liberalism died, I guess long ago because, and let me, my definition of

liberalism is reason, individualism, capitalism, the founding principles of the

United States.

Right.

They've been, they've been whitewashed for decades, ever since the 60s when this, you

know, the student radicals took, took over, I guess.

Yeah, they've been misrepresented or ignored or blacklisted or whatever you.

All of the above.

And so for me, conservative intellectual is a contradiction.

But no, I agree.

I mean there were a few intellectuals that I respected.

Didn't, didn't agree with everything but they've been so marginalized now that they

really have no voice in the current Republican Party.

How is that as a specific.

Maybe there is more to be fundamental and

talking about ideas but this, I think it was you, Blair, that mentioned it to me one time

and I don't agree on everything and don't follow everything but this what is called bull

work or bull.

Yeah, where would you position them? Are they like a small fringe in a not positive

way, but they are not MAGA or, or this on the bandwagon that what everything Trump is doing

is so called right as the so called leader.

I mean it had been almost a cult following.

They are going against that.

But what do they want instead?

I mean I don't think they're nearly as well defined as we would be as

objectivists, but I've read some of their stuff and certainly they're much more aligned

with us than maga.

You know, they at least are attempting to use logic and reason and not, it's not all just

these emotionalist arguments.

And if I can bring up a recent example, I

posted a reposted, I guess an article by my former ARI colleague Agostina Vergara Sid on

the Venezuelan refugees that Trump wants to send back to Venezuela, that's appalling.

These are people that escaped one of the most horrific dictatorships on the planet to even

think about sending them back.

And same thing as, you know, when Dr.

Leonard Pico stand up for Elian Gonzalez.

I will never forgive him for doing that.

Yeah, yeah.

No, it's horrible to send back someone who had the bravery and the foresight

to get out of that horrible situation.

To send them back is just unspeakable.

And there were a couple of so called objectivist who jumped on the comments and

like, oh, you know, there's Venezuelan gangs, you know, doing this and that and complete

collectivist approach first of all.

And then other people jumped on the comments and pointed out that all of these stories that

they were referencing had been completely debunked.

They were, you know, made up nonsense like, you know, they're eating the cats and dogs in

Springfield.

Just total emotionalist non.

Just didn't happen and it doesn't matter.

Then, you know, you point to the objective

facts and they're like, oh yeah, well you can't trust the liberal media.

That's, you know, it must be true because I feel it's true.

And when you get people that are calling themselves Objectivists who are taking that

approach, that, that is scary to me.

Very much so.

Returning to your article, that's.

It's all right.

No, I want, I wanted to cover all these things again.

It's a very good article and I appreciated the fact that you mentioned the Progress movement,

if you will.

Can you go, go on about that for a bit?

A little bit, yeah.

I think one of the few positive things that I

see in the culture right now is this new Progress studies.

And I mentioned the Roots of Progress, which is a new, fairly new group founded by Jason

Crawford.

And I've known Jason For, God, 25 years at least back when he was a campus club

coordinator.

I mean, I was the coordinator, he was the

campus club student.

He's so bright.

I mean he is, he was incredibly bright and talented.

I knew it back then.

And he has proven himself.

The whole family, the Crawfords.

The whole family, actually.

Yeah, the Crawfords are a very smart bunch.

That's true, that's true.

But I think that what they're doing, and you

know, he's an objectivist.

I think a lot of the people involved in the

movement are.

But I don't think that you have to be.

No, but their focus on the efficacy of man and

man's use of reason to improve his life and that, you know, that progress is possible.

And it's not inevitable, but if you, if you give people freedom, then they will use their

minds and they will make great things happen.

And that's the kind of optimism that we need to see in the culture.

And I don't see any of that in sort of the mainstream conservative movement.

It's all doom and gloom.

America's a hellscape.

The liberals have destroyed everything and

it's just not true.

And it's also not useful in creating a better

future, I think.

Yeah, very well said.

Very well said.

I also want to mention another.

I guess I'm assuming he's objectivist Blake

Shoal of Boom Supersonic.

That's another spectacular.

Absolutely.

Yeah.

Incredible. And Blake also was a campus club kid and I knew him back then and always knew

he was going to do great things but had no idea it would be what he did do.

I think it's amazing and I'm very happy for him.

So the overall point I want to make, and you guys can chime in, there are always,

no matter how gloomy it looks out there, there's always currents going the other way.

I interrupt you now, Blair.

It's like the great campus club magazine

undercurrent.

Right, Dan?

That's a great word too.

That's a great word.

They're always undercurrents.

Yeah.

So yes, there's always undercurrents flowing the other way.

And I, I've mentioned this a lot lately over the.

Whenever I, When I began reading Ms. Rand, I was, I was 24ish.

This was late like 1979.

And ever since then when I, I've been a flame spotter myself And I'm sure you know the

reference in Atlas about that.

Oh absolutely.

And I am bragging but I've introduced like 45 people to her ideas.

The novel.

That's worth bragging about and that's fantastic.

And all but one said thank you.

You know, they, they, they, you know they

were.

That's a great achievement, Claire.

And I want to do a little comment on that

also.

I was in my mid teens in 85 when the institute

started and sent to Mike Berlin and we started a club in Gothenburg and we were at the book

fair and we got permission to translate works into Swedish and we, I mean I was more

political but I was coming from, you could say small L Libertarian or the so called

conservative but it was.

They are called themselves moderate but I didn't see that they had any base.

So I want to see the liberal things and in a, in a context.

So then it Was like a youth or you could say university that was on academia that was more,

even more liberal.

But even there it was different fractions and

so on.

But it was not much that you came from the so called conservative groups.

It was more liberal.

So it's interesting how the word liberal in

other parts of the world is really meaning liberal like Latin in freedom but in America

become so called leftist.

And that's.

I think it's time to take that back.

I agree, I agree very much so.

Very much so.

And then of course you could debate and an intellectual discussion about is it

from left to right or is it more like a circle or is it this, you know, anti.

For the individual or other things like that.

You know, it's individualist, collectivist.

Yeah, so.

Yeah, exactly.

And my, that's my.

Here's my line, I guess.

Yeah.

Sturt.

I want to thank you for coming on the show.

I know it's short lived but I, I again I. Your

article struck me so much.

I wanted to talk to you about it and I

appreciate you coming on.

Tell us where we can find you on the web.

Well, I have started this substack.

I think if you go to substack and put in my

name, Stuart S T E W A R T and then it's Margolis M A R G O L I S.

Oh it's on the screen if anyone's watching.

But yeah, I think it'll pop right up.

And you can subscribe for free.

Of course.

You can also subscribe.

Give me money.

That's always nice but I want the readership first and foremost.

I'm also on Facebook although I'm not posting as much there.

But yeah, those are the two places you can find me.

Do you have a title for your substack or is it just under your name?

Right now it's just under my name.

I am thinking of maybe calling it Bias towards

Reason but I haven't decided for sure.

Right now it's just under my name.

Yeah. And now when you're talking and we could talk about that in future.

Got some ideas what we could do together because it's great to have you as a guest and

your article is very important and how you could present yourself and you have lots of

experience.

So I see that when you talking about support.

So you could support this show also going to

like TrueFans FM and follow our podcast and become a fan and then you could stream

satoshis part of a bitcoin and also send it Boostergram and then we could share it with

our guests.

So I have some ideas too at what we could talk about in the future, what we could do, because

I see lots of classical liberals and especially objectivists that have a message

out there and they could spread it now thanks to technology and still freedom of expression.

So we could do that.

And with podcast and the rss and podcasting

2.0, we can't be deplatformed.

We could speak out.

Of course, we always have to take consequences of our ideas and what we are saying.

But if we could reach the new intellectuals out there in different ways.

So thanks again, Blair, for doing this questions and reaching out to Stuart.

And hopefully we'll do a follow up in the near future.

So thanks again.

Keep writing, Stuart.

Keep writing.

I will.

I'm going to be posting at least once a week.

I've got lots to say.

There's not going on in the world.

It's hard to keep up.

It is hard to keep up.

All right.

Well, ladies and gentlemen, our guest today

has been Stuart Margolis.

Stuart, thanks for manning the foxhole with

us.

You're very welcome.

It's been fun.

Thanks.

Jewish.