Speaker:

You can use whatever code you want. Can you hold space for me right now?

Speaker:

Because it's not going to be pretty. Yes, I can. Okay, cool. Then

Speaker:

I'm holding space. I have no judgment. I have no opinion. I'm not going to

Speaker:

defend myself. I'm not going to defend you. I'm just going to allow

Speaker:

you to do whatever it is that you need to do.

Speaker:

And then at the end, we have a phrase of, are you

Speaker:

complete? Welcome to The King Within, a podcast for men who seem

Speaker:

to have it all, yet feel like they're losing what matters most. I'm

Speaker:

Mike Salemi, and I've been there. Successful on paper, but disconnected on

Speaker:

the inside. This isn't about grinding harder. It's about mastering

Speaker:

your emotions, leading with calm strength, and rebuilding

Speaker:

trust at home. Each week we dive into real stories and tools for becoming

Speaker:

the man your family runs towards, not away from, because you didn't

Speaker:

build this life to lose yourself in it. This is The King Within. Let's do

Speaker:

the work. So one thing that's really top of mind is

Speaker:

challenge, challenge, fights, conflict

Speaker:

like that, the energy of that and

Speaker:

how that's experienced in relationship individually and in the

Speaker:

relationship. But when you see— and let's see where this goes—

Speaker:

but when you find a couple that gets stuck, let's say the

Speaker:

same fight, we could come up, we can make an assumption whether it's around

Speaker:

money, whether it's around I don't know, choices around food. But

Speaker:

when a couple gets in the same fight over and over and

Speaker:

over, can you start helping me and us start

Speaker:

maybe peeling back the layers of what might actually

Speaker:

be happening underneath of this repetitive

Speaker:

conflict that tends to arise? Or what goes through your mind? Where do you, where

Speaker:

do you tend to look or want to explore within that? It's the million-dollar

Speaker:

question, I guess, right? So Widow, will we jump

Speaker:

in with this one? So I would say one of the things that I'm most

Speaker:

sensitive to is

Speaker:

trying to first understand

Speaker:

their biases, my bias,

Speaker:

where I'm sensitive, where they may or may not be as sensitive

Speaker:

to me, and understand that

Speaker:

my historical conditioning creates a filter,

Speaker:

a lens. A lot of times when I'm working with clients

Speaker:

and couples, uh, most of them are old enough to remember Elton John

Speaker:

and his psychedelic outfits and his glasses. So

Speaker:

I refer to people in that regards— we wear these

Speaker:

glasses, and if they are orange-tinted

Speaker:

glasses We see the whole world through orange,

Speaker:

and they might have purple-colored glasses, and they're seeing

Speaker:

the world through purple. One of the things

Speaker:

that begins the journey is we have

Speaker:

to take the glasses off in order

Speaker:

to gain some level of clarity.

Speaker:

So for me, the colored glasses are our conditioned

Speaker:

ideas about how we feel, what we believe,

Speaker:

our limiting beliefs, our associations, how we've interpreted

Speaker:

who or what we are as an individual since infancy and through

Speaker:

childhood. That's reinforced. That

Speaker:

evolves into then how I see others and I see the world.

Speaker:

And in particular, we're talking about relationships. So

Speaker:

really getting clear with both of them

Speaker:

Understanding and on some level appreciating that,

Speaker:

that then leads into until we take the

Speaker:

glasses off, we truly—

Speaker:

I have experienced we're not going to solve our

Speaker:

problems at all. And

Speaker:

what that looks like is, one, the courage and

Speaker:

curiosity to say and experience what could be beyond

Speaker:

the colors of these glasses. Is one

Speaker:

factor. The other factor is, is

Speaker:

that a lot of times people approach this where,

Speaker:

well, if I just switch my glasses to a different color, will

Speaker:

that help? And then that gets into just reshuffling. It's like

Speaker:

a shell game we play with ourselves and try to

Speaker:

repackage our historical conditioning, which that

Speaker:

too, I feel like, doesn't reconcile the

Speaker:

heart and the mind as to what's really going on with those underlying dynamics

Speaker:

within the relationship. Relationship. And so it's an

Speaker:

invitation and a journey for them individually to

Speaker:

take off the glasses, which would be similar

Speaker:

to psychological terms like coming out of one's

Speaker:

psychological trance, meaning that I'm stuck in a

Speaker:

psychological, emotional framework

Speaker:

mentally and emotionally, and I just don't seem to be able to get out of

Speaker:

it. I refer a lot of times to like being stuck in the rabbit hole.

Speaker:

I've gone down and I just cannot see the left

Speaker:

nor to the right. So it's about inviting them

Speaker:

to come back out from that perspective.

Speaker:

And we can get into the techniques that one could explore to do

Speaker:

that. But unless both of them are—

Speaker:

unless they're willing to take those glasses off

Speaker:

and then look at the, quote, supposed problem,

Speaker:

If both don't take the glasses off, then we're still talking

Speaker:

over, through, under each other with our biases

Speaker:

and our heart, our hurts and our conditioning. All

Speaker:

of that is still active and present. And no matter how

Speaker:

logical, grounded, or stoic I'm

Speaker:

presenting something, it's not

Speaker:

landing psychologically. They are present. Their eardrums

Speaker:

hear the reverberation. They know that there's talk. But it's

Speaker:

truly an interpretation of through my conditioned response.

Speaker:

And so until that's addressed,

Speaker:

it's very— I have found very difficult for

Speaker:

relationships to get aligned and

Speaker:

work through, transmute, overcome, address

Speaker:

these conflicts that you were referring to that we have.

Speaker:

So if I were to summarize it as A, acknowledge that we have

Speaker:

glasses, that they're biased.

Speaker:

Be willing to be curious and have the courage to take the

Speaker:

glasses off genuinely.

Speaker:

And then number 3, explore within myself

Speaker:

where and how my conditioning makes it difficult for me to want to take those

Speaker:

glasses off and want to keep them on because

Speaker:

I've used that as a form of protection and safety.

Speaker:

And we can get into that as well, but there's all kinds of

Speaker:

whys. And then ultimately is then

Speaker:

still addressing the conflict, but now

Speaker:

with a fresh set of eyes and an open heart.

Speaker:

And I feel like if both can— are willing

Speaker:

to approach something similar to that, then

Speaker:

there's hope to work through that, because then there is

Speaker:

genuine no age to regress or no trance

Speaker:

activated, we're not triggered, we're not— we've minimized

Speaker:

how much I'm coming from a place of

Speaker:

frustration, lack of belief, or an interpretation. That's

Speaker:

how my dad used to handle that, or that's how my mom used to handle

Speaker:

it. Now I've learned how to cope with that for this way. And those

Speaker:

protections fall to the side, right? And then we can have an honest,

Speaker:

a more honest conversation, and then we can be vulnerable. Yeah,

Speaker:

I can say, I acknowledge my likes

Speaker:

and biases are because I've been trying to protect myself in a

Speaker:

relationship. And that's how I watched my parents relate, and

Speaker:

I thought that that was a successful way to manage

Speaker:

my approval of them. And now that I take the glasses off, I can

Speaker:

see clearly. I can see, hey, I've— I'm operating—

Speaker:

I had been operating in that way. And it's

Speaker:

understandable that you might be frustrated with me from

Speaker:

coming from that place. So then we start getting vulnerable.

Speaker:

We start talking about our conditioning as if it's something

Speaker:

that is acknowledged fully and you're

Speaker:

considerate of how it's impacting the relationship. And then

Speaker:

I feel like it's reciprocal. Then people start talking. Then the other person

Speaker:

starts getting a little bit softer. And, and the next thing you know,

Speaker:

we're dealing with the conflict. But like I said, with those fresh set of

Speaker:

eyes and, and then that really brings about restoring,

Speaker:

transmuting, healing, whatever word that fits for us. But

Speaker:

there's a reconciliation of this conflict in a more meaningful

Speaker:

way. And then you can approach it as such.

Speaker:

The last thing I'll say here, Mike, is that I've experienced where

Speaker:

if people still have a tinge of an agenda, it is, I

Speaker:

need you to change. Like, I need you to acknowledge your conflict

Speaker:

with me. And until you quote unquote change your

Speaker:

literal behaviors, we're going to always have conflict.

Speaker:

So it's almost like putting one

Speaker:

foot in and one foot out of taking the glasses off. Yeah,

Speaker:

a lot of times people are looking for the other to ensure that

Speaker:

they make the changes to eliminate the

Speaker:

conflict. Like if you, you need to do X, Y, and Z

Speaker:

in order for this conflict to go away. So they're one foot in

Speaker:

of taking the glasses partially off, and

Speaker:

it's still, you know, on the tip of their nose, so to speak. They're kind

Speaker:

of like bifocals at that point, you know, they could see beyond it,

Speaker:

but there's a subtle agenda

Speaker:

with this reconciliation part. So for

Speaker:

me, until they fully take the glasses off, take

Speaker:

responsibility for their part, really consider how their conditioning has been

Speaker:

driving the bus on how they are seeing things through those orange or

Speaker:

purple tinted glasses, remove them

Speaker:

and be vulnerable, and also then work through

Speaker:

the conflict. Because that gives you, if you will,

Speaker:

no pun intended here, a fighting chance to work through the

Speaker:

conflict. If not, you're still in

Speaker:

and out of, and mostly out of or in, your age-regressed

Speaker:

or trance or your old conditioned patterns.

Speaker:

And that's when we can't resolve conflict. When you were

Speaker:

talking about, like, I really appreciate the example of protecting,

Speaker:

right? Like, and I think giving more color as we are

Speaker:

continuing to give more color into some of the ways that this can look will

Speaker:

be super helpful. And that piece that you

Speaker:

just shared about expecting the other person to change, and I want to like

Speaker:

define some terms as well. I know you and I were talking about that before.

Speaker:

One of the things I'd love to hear when you're, when you're talking about I'm

Speaker:

expecting the other person to change, can you break down like how would you define

Speaker:

codependency, healthy codependency if there is such,

Speaker:

unhealthy codependency, and that expectation that,

Speaker:

or I'm doing this so that the other person will change or they have to

Speaker:

change. Can you break down what is codependency to you and especially

Speaker:

unhealthy codependency? Um, so codependency

Speaker:

for me, I'll say there's multi-levels.

Speaker:

So I would say in my

Speaker:

relationship with Zayna, there are some

Speaker:

physical codependencies that I have with her

Speaker:

in relationship. So I am

Speaker:

codependent upon her showing up and being physically present for us if

Speaker:

we want to be intimate sexually and sensually. Uh, there's a

Speaker:

dependency that I can lift heavy weight. So if

Speaker:

we're moving or I need to carry things from the car upstairs,

Speaker:

there's an inherent dependency on my contribution

Speaker:

to our relationship. So for me,

Speaker:

there, there's different levels. And those are just

Speaker:

physical examples where I would say

Speaker:

codependency, which is the typical language I

Speaker:

think we've— we use within the realm of self-development

Speaker:

and psychology and spirituality.

Speaker:

Codependency, I would say

Speaker:

99.9% of the time is dysfunctional,

Speaker:

in my opinion. Yeah. And for me,

Speaker:

if we think and feel like my partner is

Speaker:

responsible to take away my mental and emotional

Speaker:

and spiritual dissatisfaction with life or

Speaker:

my pain or you fill in the blank.

Speaker:

That to me is when it becomes very toxic, because

Speaker:

we're looking for someone outside of ourselves

Speaker:

to provide happiness, peace.

Speaker:

That is more of a psychological-based

Speaker:

understanding. So I am giving myself away

Speaker:

in my psyche to the power of someone outside of myself

Speaker:

to put something inside of me mentally or

Speaker:

emotionally so that I can feel okay and good or

Speaker:

satisfied or at least peaceful within

Speaker:

myself. So to me, that's where the

Speaker:

codependency is toxic,

Speaker:

negative. I'm not sure the right word that lands, but I don't find it

Speaker:

functional. Maybe that's a good word to say. I don't

Speaker:

find that area of life codependency as being

Speaker:

functional. We have to survive in some level

Speaker:

within life, navigating life, paying the bills. So there's environmental

Speaker:

factors. I'm codependent. My partner and her

Speaker:

contributions, right or wrong, good or bad. So how

Speaker:

do we take care of the home? How do we take care of kids? How

Speaker:

do we get them this? How do we get them that? You know, there is

Speaker:

an inherent dependency that people have upon each other. And I think those

Speaker:

are functional and necessary to survive and thrive in life.

Speaker:

It is ultimately that the psychological codependency

Speaker:

that I think gets us into trouble, where we think,

Speaker:

Mike, if you don't do X, Y, and Z,

Speaker:

that satisfies all of Lauren's filters,

Speaker:

conditions. It's almost like going through all these different tollgates, right,

Speaker:

that you have to pass for her within her

Speaker:

own mental and emotional well-being. For her to say, ah,

Speaker:

Mike's a good guy, I'm not triggered. He's

Speaker:

actually soothing. I'm using what Mike— my

Speaker:

experience of Mike and soothing myself with it. And then

Speaker:

therefore, sometimes you're the best husband in the world.

Speaker:

And other times when you don't do X, Y, and Z and take away my

Speaker:

inner conflict, you know, you're the worst guy in the world.

Speaker:

And we all deal with that. And in I'm picking on you, but

Speaker:

that applies to every, every relationship under the sun. And that's where I

Speaker:

feel like this dependency criteria can be helpful

Speaker:

when we look at it through multi-layers. That's

Speaker:

fascinating, Jay, and I really appreciate that. And I want to—

Speaker:

you know, there's something that comes up in the— at least

Speaker:

like in, I would say, like, I don't know, the modern men's movement, like the

Speaker:

men's work that I'm familiar with, and even just what I hear a lot in

Speaker:

relationships. And there's— and I'm clearly

Speaker:

generalizing here, right? But just for the sake of putting this out,

Speaker:

let's just say a wife. A wife says, I

Speaker:

don't feel safe with you. I don't trust you. I don't

Speaker:

trust you because you're out of integrity, right? You're not

Speaker:

doing, I don't know, certain things that you said you would do, or

Speaker:

what a man of integrity lives. So I don't trust you. I don't feel safe.

Speaker:

With you. And so if I'm to open up, if I'm to want

Speaker:

to have, you know, intimacy or sex or whatever with what the man really wants—

Speaker:

both people want, but let's say the man's really driving that— what's your

Speaker:

thoughts on, uh, what's underneath that for both people?

Speaker:

I need you to be a certain way so I can trust you more

Speaker:

or feel safer with you. And yeah, I'll let you take it from there.

Speaker:

Yeah, thanks, Mike.

Speaker:

Um, I think the trusting in the

Speaker:

lack of trust all begins and ends

Speaker:

within oneself. So

Speaker:

I'm always— my fundamental bias is that

Speaker:

trust or no trust is still an inside job first

Speaker:

and foremost. And so then the questions,

Speaker:

it just becomes a journey to ask oneself, okay,

Speaker:

is my lack of trust because I

Speaker:

am interpreting all of these behaviors through an old

Speaker:

pattern of conditioning that I have and ideas

Speaker:

that I have with men or women,

Speaker:

whatever the dynamics are? So

Speaker:

exploring one's inner world about this concept

Speaker:

around trust— what I trust, what I don't trust—

Speaker:

I think is full stop. That's where the

Speaker:

initial accountability and responsibility around trust needs to happen.

Speaker:

I think if both of them, both persons,

Speaker:

were to first look at, is my distrust

Speaker:

on behalf of my conditioned patterns,

Speaker:

or Is it on behalf of we, you and I have

Speaker:

another option here is we both have an agreement. The agreement

Speaker:

could be is we value

Speaker:

quality time together. And

Speaker:

we had, we had none this week, so to speak.

Speaker:

And now you're choosing to go out with the boys and

Speaker:

get drunk or party or stay out late or just socialize.

Speaker:

It doesn't have to be drinking. And that would have

Speaker:

been the only window this week of quality time, but you both have made

Speaker:

an agreement that we will prioritize the relationship and its quality time is

Speaker:

number one. Now, if that was repeatedly violated,

Speaker:

so to speak, over and over again, uh, can

Speaker:

someone draw the conclusion of a lack of trust about

Speaker:

what that agreement means for each of them? Yes,

Speaker:

that trust can erode from something very practical or of

Speaker:

an existing agreement that you have. So then it would

Speaker:

foster, ideally, a conversation about,

Speaker:

we have an agreement. Can we just take a step back and say,

Speaker:

what do agreements mean for us individually and then

Speaker:

collectively? If we're going to treat

Speaker:

this agreement with

Speaker:

the level of trust and honor

Speaker:

Are we vulnerable to every other agreement that we have? So can we

Speaker:

have that conversation? So I think it leads to those

Speaker:

hopeful conversations to take a step back and

Speaker:

ask the bigger questions. And then you can get into

Speaker:

getting into the very specific agreement that you have and say, my

Speaker:

experience of this agreement to be honored is X. What

Speaker:

is your— which— what's Y for you? And do we

Speaker:

need to revisit this agreement? Maybe the agreement needs to be

Speaker:

adapted. Maybe we need to get even more clarity

Speaker:

about the practical application of this agreement so

Speaker:

that my expectations and any

Speaker:

ambiguity with this agreement that I had that I didn't maybe give as

Speaker:

much voice to is further detailed or

Speaker:

delineated so that we move forward

Speaker:

with this revised agreement and learning

Speaker:

from what it meant to have these experiences, our respective experiences with

Speaker:

this lack of showing up for each other in whatever way that

Speaker:

that might have looked like. So in summary, Mike, I think of it as

Speaker:

the trust or no trust ultimately is a signal

Speaker:

to the relationship that we need to have a heartfelt

Speaker:

conversation. That's to me the number one

Speaker:

criteria or a the number one indicator,

Speaker:

rather than minimizing each other's perspectives

Speaker:

and blowing off, et cetera.

Speaker:

So, you know, those are some key things maybe worth considering. Yeah, I

Speaker:

really appreciate that. Because when you were out here as well, like one of the

Speaker:

questions when we were hanging out on the couch that you posed to Lauren and

Speaker:

I, when we were just having a discussion, was the

Speaker:

invitation for us to individually clarify and

Speaker:

define what is connection. To each of us.

Speaker:

And, uh, you know, Lauren, in the, in the lens of the,

Speaker:

let's say, the Enneagram, Lauren's core type is a Type 2, the helper.

Speaker:

As you know, my core type is a Type 1. The same for you and

Speaker:

Zayna. I've also got clients that fall into this, basically

Speaker:

the same, uh, pattern, let's just say.

Speaker:

And what I'm hearing too is just the important— whether it's connection, whether it's trust,

Speaker:

uh, whether it's integrity, like the importance of

Speaker:

defining or clarifying, deepening

Speaker:

individually what and how do we experience these things that

Speaker:

we so deeply want, right? Like we want to, yes, trust. I think at

Speaker:

the deepest level, trust ourselves, trust our experience of our partner, to feel

Speaker:

connected with our partner. But I thought that was really profound because it's

Speaker:

not a question that we really ever really

Speaker:

explored, as wild as that is. And I would imagine many people too, I would

Speaker:

say the vast majority, have not explored How they define

Speaker:

that and then what can come up from that type

Speaker:

of dialogue. And, um,

Speaker:

so if you have thoughts on that, I'd love to hear, and I'd love to

Speaker:

also, as an example, through,

Speaker:

uh, using the Enneagram as like an

Speaker:

identification or, uh, of patterns, let's say,

Speaker:

I think the heart of what I'd love to ask is

Speaker:

not only why is it so important to get this clarity in relationship, but

Speaker:

also to— like, you, you had mentioned multiple times the

Speaker:

filters. Can you give us some examples of those filters? And

Speaker:

let's just say a Type 1 and a Type 2 in, in a scenario like

Speaker:

this. Yeah, so just real

Speaker:

quick, a couple of definitions of terms for ourselves, right? So

Speaker:

just throw— I'll throw some names out there. So the American Psychological

Speaker:

Association defines personality as Patterning of

Speaker:

thinking, feeling, emoting, and behaving.

Speaker:

So the personality assessment that I

Speaker:

co-created helps us understand that through the

Speaker:

lens of the Enneagram. So it takes the theory of personality,

Speaker:

uh, personality types, personality methodology, and says,

Speaker:

okay, within that umbrella, the Enneagram is just one

Speaker:

way to do that. There are 9 personality types. From

Speaker:

a personality perspective, all of them have a strength,

Speaker:

strengths plural, and, and weaknesses. They're gender

Speaker:

neutral, age neutral. You are born with

Speaker:

a predisposition for one. All other

Speaker:

8 come and go in regards to

Speaker:

the intensity of how you either engage with

Speaker:

that type or how you avoid that type or how you use

Speaker:

them situationally. Uh, from there

Speaker:

through childhood all the way up, um,

Speaker:

we put on these personas, which is another

Speaker:

way of saying a mask of ideas

Speaker:

about how we see ourselves, others in the world. We take on these fundamental

Speaker:

beliefs about ourselves. And in the

Speaker:

world that I teach and coach on in regards to the

Speaker:

Enneagram, so there's 9 different types. And yet there's 9

Speaker:

core beliefs of a sense of lack,

Speaker:

agitation, and separation that lead

Speaker:

to your personality type's belief system as a result

Speaker:

of that, right? So maybe just restate it as

Speaker:

in, in infancy and early childhood, we have this sense of lack,

Speaker:

separation, and agitation. It's a sensation. It's an experience

Speaker:

in the body. As the nervous system matures,

Speaker:

you know, I'm sure we've talked about this before with Luca. He sees an object,

Speaker:

and in the beginning, he didn't see it as his or yours or anyone's. It

Speaker:

was just— and it was just his. And there's a unicity

Speaker:

around everything. There's just total

Speaker:

one symbiotic engagement with life. And then as

Speaker:

his nervous system matured, he started saying, my bottle or

Speaker:

my toy. And I am different than the little boy

Speaker:

when he's going to school and stuff like that. I'm different than mom and dad.

Speaker:

So the nervous system matures, and with that maturity

Speaker:

comes a shock to the body that I am

Speaker:

separate. And then we are pre-verbal. We don't have all the skills

Speaker:

that we supposedly have as an adult. And then there is this

Speaker:

inherent or innate adoption of a

Speaker:

belief about oneself that contributed to

Speaker:

this sense of lack that I, that I'm experiencing as an

Speaker:

early, early young kid. And so each of the 9 types

Speaker:

experiences or codifies their belief about

Speaker:

themselves through their 9 types. So for the Type 1, it is

Speaker:

all of this is occurring because I must be imperfect and that there's something wrong

Speaker:

with me. And then the Type 2 is this is

Speaker:

going on in my life because I am worthless.

Speaker:

And each of the 9 types: I am powerless, I am

Speaker:

incomplete, I am inadequate. I can go on and on,

Speaker:

but fill in the blank that each one has their core

Speaker:

belief that they believe not only about themselves, but others

Speaker:

that are projected onto others and projected onto the world.

Speaker:

So when you— those are the glasses, right? I referred to

Speaker:

earlier, Ellen Jarrin glasses. So You know, like each— you

Speaker:

could think of each of the 9 types as having their own unique

Speaker:

color of glasses. So the Type 1

Speaker:

is orange, Type 2 is purple, red is for the 3,

Speaker:

green is for the 4, so on. So when we, as a result, early on

Speaker:

put on those glasses, then our environment and

Speaker:

our experiences shape how thick those glasses become,

Speaker:

which means how much we over-identify and become very

Speaker:

rigid or myopic in seeing the world in that very biased

Speaker:

manner. And that's when we have two people come together

Speaker:

with different levels of thickness of glasses and different

Speaker:

colors and a.k.a. different filters and conditioning

Speaker:

are then clashing. Right. So that to me

Speaker:

is a quick little summary of how that

Speaker:

evolves into all of those dynamics. I like the

Speaker:

visual of the thickness of the glasses. And so it was

Speaker:

really just bringing it home in a a way that could, could

Speaker:

paint a picture of how two types can use the

Speaker:

awareness, right? Because I think in Wolinsky's book, which is a book that

Speaker:

you recommended, something called like Intimate Relationships, I don't know if it

Speaker:

was his stance or he was sharing from a teacher, but in there, and you've

Speaker:

said this, like we first need to be aware of what

Speaker:

we're trying to let go of, or it's helpful to be aware of what we're

Speaker:

trying to let go of for us to let go of it. I'm paraphrasing. Yeah.

Speaker:

You can't let go of something until you know what that is.

Speaker:

Yeah. So if someone, and I think in part what would be

Speaker:

really helpful because like even with this knowledge of, okay, I see the

Speaker:

world, which I super resonate with, as there's something,

Speaker:

or especially historically in a lot of the, when I think back to the

Speaker:

most painful charged moments, the most difficult plant

Speaker:

medicine experiences, when I look at my journal and I like review what was going

Speaker:

on, I was like, wow, how I was interpreting what came up

Speaker:

that event. When she said this, or when

Speaker:

this business deal went this way, or when mom and dad did this,

Speaker:

when I really felt into why did this affect me so

Speaker:

deeply, and I dig deep enough, more often

Speaker:

than not, I would touch on some aspect of like, wow, I really

Speaker:

am petrified or was petrified. It made me feel somatically

Speaker:

like I made a mistake or there's something wrong with

Speaker:

me. And so I just realized, like, holy shit,

Speaker:

like, the awareness of this when I'm in the shit, if I'm aware of

Speaker:

it enough and I'm not completely like in the bottle

Speaker:

per se, I can actually recognize like, oh

Speaker:

damn, like I'm on the goggles right now. And so I think the

Speaker:

awareness is key. And like, I've heard this from clients, like, how

Speaker:

do I like, like, one, be aware of it? How in the fuck do I

Speaker:

take this off? Like, to your point earlier, if

Speaker:

I'm in relation, both people are charged,

Speaker:

like that process of being aware and taking it off. I'd love for you to

Speaker:

talk us through that, but let's use the example through maybe the

Speaker:

1 and the 2 as an example for this. Yeah, sure. Uh, thanks for

Speaker:

calibrating me there. Yeah. Um, yeah, so remember,

Speaker:

so that the Type 1 is looking at it through that there is something wrong

Speaker:

with me, I am imperfect. The fear of making mistakes

Speaker:

and the shame of being bad. And bad meaning a character

Speaker:

flaw, like I'm flawed with my character and my

Speaker:

code. The Type 2 is coming from it through I

Speaker:

feel, I believe, and the belief is so

Speaker:

visceral. I mean, you can't negotiate with this. It has

Speaker:

been believed in since childhood that I am worthless.

Speaker:

I have the fear of being rejected. And the shame of not

Speaker:

being valued, right? So when you have those ingredients, those,

Speaker:

those are the glasses we're wearing. So how do you

Speaker:

take the glasses off? Uh, part of it is, number

Speaker:

one, is acknowledging that I have glasses to

Speaker:

begin with. Um, that's got

Speaker:

to be a prerequisite, number one.

Speaker:

So, uh, One, well, that's why

Speaker:

I use my assessment, which is to go through this with people so that

Speaker:

they can see for themselves how their

Speaker:

graph, their psychological fingerprint, is actually showing up in

Speaker:

which of the 9 types they're using to protect themselves

Speaker:

and to navigate life, and ultimately

Speaker:

how they've been trying to overcome that which they believe

Speaker:

about themselves, which creates a lot of this inner conflict.

Speaker:

I believe this about myself deep down, a lot of times

Speaker:

unconsciously, subconsciously. And yet what we're

Speaker:

conscious of are these patterns of compensation

Speaker:

for trying to disprove that which I believe about myself,

Speaker:

which I really don't want to. But

Speaker:

I'm at the mercy of all of that conditioning. So although

Speaker:

the adult intellect might understand that 1

Speaker:

1 2, the little boy in

Speaker:

us might say, no, that's 8. And we're going to still live

Speaker:

from the place that it's 8, right? So

Speaker:

step number 1 is being really

Speaker:

clear or having that presented to them for them

Speaker:

to consider ways in which they have not considered

Speaker:

those pattern conditions. To the quote you were

Speaker:

just referencing, you can't let go of something unless you know what it

Speaker:

is. So, you know, Carl Jung and other people make the quote and

Speaker:

references, until you bring the conscious to light, you're going to call

Speaker:

it fate, etc., that famous quote. So I

Speaker:

find that's very, very similar, right? So we have to

Speaker:

first come to terms with what are the patterns that

Speaker:

I'm in, I've engaged in throughout life, and

Speaker:

then really start reflecting on, well, what is that

Speaker:

core, most fundamental primal belief that

Speaker:

I've adopted since early, early childhood. For us, Mike, the

Speaker:

Type 1 is, I'm imperfect, there's something wrong with me. And for

Speaker:

the Type 2, it's, I am, or I am worthless. So until

Speaker:

I can see those patternings come

Speaker:

up for myself, then yes, I have that level

Speaker:

of awareness. Belaboring that point, but that's step number 1.

Speaker:

Step number 2 is then saying, I'm going

Speaker:

to stop, hold up, and I'm going

Speaker:

to put— pump the brakes, so to speak. Now,

Speaker:

I use a metaphor sometimes. You might be historically in

Speaker:

a speedboat, and initially you throw that speedboat

Speaker:

into neutral. The wake of the boat is still going to carry you forward to

Speaker:

some degree, but you begin— so it's not typically a

Speaker:

hard stop, like you don't just start changing patterns of 30 and

Speaker:

40 and 50 years at the drop of a hat.

Speaker:

So it becomes a process. And you—

Speaker:

I would encourage everyone to be patient,

Speaker:

to undo what's been done for decades. So it's like throwing

Speaker:

that boat into neutral. The wake of the boat's still going to carry it,

Speaker:

but the velocity, the intensity starts diminishing over time, and

Speaker:

eventually the boat comes to a standstill, right? So one,

Speaker:

we become aware of the pattern, and two, we start inquiring and saying,

Speaker:

I got it, I just need to stop. I know what this pattern is like.

Speaker:

I know the consequences and the benefits that I've

Speaker:

used this patterning from. Ideally, you've done a little bit of that work

Speaker:

with a coach. And then you could say, okay, I'm just going

Speaker:

to stop indulging in that pattern and give yourself

Speaker:

a chance to rewire into

Speaker:

a new entrainment, a new pathway for

Speaker:

you to reconsider what's going on in

Speaker:

your environment. And that, can I consider that

Speaker:

there's another alternative to the pattern that I've indulged in for

Speaker:

a long, long time that has been conflictual

Speaker:

within relationship? So that would be step number 2. Then step number 3 would

Speaker:

be is inquire. Looking

Speaker:

at, hey, am I coming from a place of

Speaker:

compensation? You ask a lot of open-ended questions— who, what, when, how, and why, right?

Speaker:

Am I coming from a place of compensation? Am I really

Speaker:

trying to protect myself? On whose behalf am

Speaker:

I trying to protect myself? The little conditioned parts

Speaker:

of me, or am I truly representing the adult Mike

Speaker:

or the adult Jason in

Speaker:

this relationship? And that's a pretty interesting experience to

Speaker:

really— some people will say, how old do I feel? Is another good

Speaker:

question to experience

Speaker:

for themselves. And then we can get into certain

Speaker:

techniques like dismantling. You want

Speaker:

to— well, I'll be careful with terms here, but dismantling,

Speaker:

meaning breaking up that pattern. Yeah, just to be clear.

Speaker:

And the another, the next step to me is becoming

Speaker:

the witness or the observer with

Speaker:

observing that patterning. So no longer being

Speaker:

a full-blown participant, but the witness or

Speaker:

the observer element within yourself to see it like a movie

Speaker:

on a screen rather than being sucked into the

Speaker:

movie and the screen. You become more I know

Speaker:

this is playing itself out. I'm

Speaker:

witnessing it. I joke with myself and clients that I work with. I'm like,

Speaker:

get your popcorn ready because you're going to have a lot of observations and

Speaker:

witnessing your conditioning wanting to still go

Speaker:

in certain patterns, right? Another phrase I'll use

Speaker:

sometimes is it's like emotional gravity.

Speaker:

There's an inherent gravitational pull

Speaker:

emotionally to go in that old pattern. And at times

Speaker:

it feels uncomfortable, but helping become the witness

Speaker:

or the observer of that old

Speaker:

pattern is giving you the ability to create

Speaker:

space. And we get so absorbed in this character,

Speaker:

the persona, how we act out from those, those,

Speaker:

that personality perspective, that it's really important for us

Speaker:

to create psychological muscle

Speaker:

to create separation from the event, the situation, the

Speaker:

thought, the sensation in the body, the emotion, the

Speaker:

words that maybe Lauren shares with you, the words that Zaina

Speaker:

shares with me, to take them

Speaker:

as objects within our experience and not absorb them

Speaker:

as if it's my identity. And I think that's

Speaker:

a really important process because

Speaker:

until you create that

Speaker:

separation initially, that's synonymous with our earlier part of the conversation. It helps you come

Speaker:

out of that rabbit hole. It helps you come out of that

Speaker:

myopic perspective that gets us all into trouble. It keeps those glasses

Speaker:

on where once you can create separation and become the observer

Speaker:

of your experience, that's affording you

Speaker:

the opportunity to take the glasses

Speaker:

off. Because, you know, the glasses are thoughts, ideas,

Speaker:

limiting beliefs, associations, interpretations of myself, others in

Speaker:

the world under the all pretense. And so by

Speaker:

creating space, it allows me to take the glasses

Speaker:

off. Then we typically will be in our parasympathetic nervous system. We can

Speaker:

start to regulate ourselves, start to relax more

Speaker:

into the present moment, and then we can start

Speaker:

thinking of alternatives. How else? And then once you start asking ourselves

Speaker:

these open-ended questions, you could say, well, how else could I have

Speaker:

understood this situation? What,

Speaker:

from her perspective, is she really trying to share with me in this moment, if

Speaker:

I were to guess? You know, until we do this separation

Speaker:

and observe our phenomena,

Speaker:

we— it's a Answering that question

Speaker:

honestly becomes labor. It's very, very

Speaker:

difficult. And I know that I've done a lot of exercises with myself

Speaker:

and with clients to know that it almost feels like

Speaker:

a ripping. If I, if I could say it that way,

Speaker:

it feels intense and almost like you're

Speaker:

trying to peel off an old t-shirt that's wet. And,

Speaker:

you know, it sticks to the body and you're trying to take it, like, but

Speaker:

once you take it off, it's like, whoa, like the

Speaker:

world changes, your countenance changes, your

Speaker:

eyes change. You know, there's a lot, a lot

Speaker:

that happens. And then you can say, how do we solve this

Speaker:

problem? You're no longer under the influence of your glasses

Speaker:

now. And that observer phenomena allows you to do that.

Speaker:

I think in a way that's empowering, graceful.

Speaker:

And the last thing I'll say is, once you've had a taste

Speaker:

of it, and you've had a couple of experiences with

Speaker:

doing that, it's kind of like you can't undo what has

Speaker:

been done. Yeah, you know, you can't undo that

Speaker:

visceral experience. So then you say, ah, now I know what it's like

Speaker:

in the body to experience taking the shirt

Speaker:

off that's been stuck to me. Or taking the

Speaker:

glasses off and how I can actually solve the conflict with my partner in

Speaker:

a way that's

Speaker:

meaningful, fulfilling, brings about deeper connectivity

Speaker:

because you've removed all the things that created or facilitated

Speaker:

disconnection, so to speak. So the only thing that's left is

Speaker:

your essence, her essence. And now you can connect at

Speaker:

that level and then trying to troubleshoot who's going to pick up the

Speaker:

kid on Tuesdays, just like you did,

Speaker:

it makes it comical. Like, you kind of laugh. Okay, well, who's going to do

Speaker:

it? How do you want to do it? Okay, cool. I'll pick them up. No

Speaker:

problem. Not to suggest that everything goes away that quickly, but

Speaker:

just to piggyback on the idea that the ability

Speaker:

to problem solve the dynamics or resolve

Speaker:

or reconcile becomes so much easier and

Speaker:

leads and facilitates to more

Speaker:

connection. Man, as you were sharing that, a few things

Speaker:

came up, one of which is I think you use the word like labor. Like,

Speaker:

it is in my experience, and I've got more

Speaker:

compassion for myself, for Lauren, for us in relationship,

Speaker:

for clients, the more that I learn about this and just realize

Speaker:

I have 39 years of conditioning right? And then I

Speaker:

have my whole relationship dynamic, and we've fallen into

Speaker:

our own patterns, and she's got her whole life. And so just

Speaker:

to really anchor in, like, how much of a process

Speaker:

and that ripping of this can be. And you used a few

Speaker:

times, like, assumptions, interpretations, and limiting beliefs. And I

Speaker:

want to define some of those terms, which in my training with you,

Speaker:

like, you speak about 4 main energy blocks. So I want to define

Speaker:

that. But one, one story, real brief, that comes up

Speaker:

is I remember even after having that, like, even after

Speaker:

having this knowledge, it can still be really hard

Speaker:

for me personally. And I remember we were in the kitchen,

Speaker:

uh, I think Luca must have been like

Speaker:

1, and, uh, I was on my phone doing something. I don't know, it was

Speaker:

work, it was something. Let's just say it was something important. And Lauren was

Speaker:

doing the dishes and Luca wanted to get my attention, but I was absorbed in

Speaker:

the phone and I didn't even realize that he was there going,

Speaker:

Papa, Papa. It really— that's one of the things that really triggers Lauren. And I

Speaker:

know it also stems from not just like her values, but

Speaker:

also what she experienced growing up and her experience of that. But it brought up

Speaker:

in her whether it was I was rejecting him, um,

Speaker:

but she said like— and I don't even recall the tone of which it was

Speaker:

in, but I remember some of the effect

Speaker:

of like, um, he's trying to get his— you're not paying attention. That was it,

Speaker:

like, you're not paying attention. And it was so wild

Speaker:

because I remember her words, and then I still

Speaker:

viscerally remember immediately, immediately what I made it mean. And it

Speaker:

was, it was as if she literally said, you're a

Speaker:

bad father. That's how it was experienced to me, and that's

Speaker:

what I internalized. And then I went through my own

Speaker:

downward spiral. I remember like a day or something like that, and I was withdrawn,

Speaker:

I was quiet, I was beating myself up, and

Speaker:

then projecting onto her. So I was in my— I was lost in the

Speaker:

sauce, right? And she had no way, by no way, shape, or form— we had

Speaker:

the discussion after, she's like, you're a fantastic father. And I explained to her

Speaker:

like how I experienced that and what I was making

Speaker:

it mean. And I want to use that as an example to tee up

Speaker:

the energy blocks and to have you define those and how those show

Speaker:

up in relationship. Yeah,

Speaker:

thanks, Mike. So there are the—

Speaker:

this notion of a gremlin, they call it a gremlin, or you can call

Speaker:

it a false core, a false belief, which we refer

Speaker:

to as for the Type 2 is I am worthless, and for the Type

Speaker:

1, I am imperfect. So it's a

Speaker:

belief system and core beliefs and vows that you've

Speaker:

taken on about self, others, and

Speaker:

the world. Associations are

Speaker:

simply associating current-day events

Speaker:

through your historical experiences. And

Speaker:

that could be, in some regards,

Speaker:

similar to what you were giving voice

Speaker:

to. Although interpretations is another one, which is really judgments

Speaker:

of self and others that you were taught as a youngster.

Speaker:

So you're interpreting it through those filters of judgments and ideas of what's

Speaker:

right and what's wrong. And then limiting

Speaker:

beliefs are those

Speaker:

lesser, stingy, but still energetic beliefs and

Speaker:

ideas. They're concepts that

Speaker:

you— or sometimes people will call them— I'll even go out on a limb here

Speaker:

and say identities. They

Speaker:

are ideas that you believe about yourself that

Speaker:

may not raise as intense as the level of I

Speaker:

am imperfect, but they are associated with, in many ways,

Speaker:

the voice in the head of I could have done

Speaker:

this better. This is not fair. People who

Speaker:

do this are not as good as people who do that. Those tend

Speaker:

to be examples of limiting beliefs. So All

Speaker:

of those, to simply say, is there

Speaker:

are innate patterns of

Speaker:

thinking, sensing, perceiving, and

Speaker:

fee— and emoting that really speak

Speaker:

to the different categories of our psyche, if

Speaker:

you will, that have an

Speaker:

energetic signature to them. And then

Speaker:

that energy feels very sticky or gooey, although it feels

Speaker:

normal and comfortable,

Speaker:

right? There's sometimes a heaviness

Speaker:

about it. So, you know, those to me is all of

Speaker:

that, the sum of all of those different

Speaker:

ideas, beliefs, associations. I even, I get the sense

Speaker:

of even like a heaviness even listing them. I mean, it feels like a laundry

Speaker:

list, for crying out loud, right? Yeah. Then you take

Speaker:

it where I have this tension in the body, I have this

Speaker:

physical left knee pain, or you get

Speaker:

into emotions. It's like I have this sense of anger. There are times

Speaker:

that I could flip a switch and have absolute rage and want to just punch

Speaker:

someone in the face. You know, all of those

Speaker:

are just the totality

Speaker:

of our, of our energetic signature,

Speaker:

our psychological fingerprint that we're walking

Speaker:

around with consciously and unconsciously about how we're

Speaker:

trying to navigate life. And so it can

Speaker:

be quite, quite tricky. And that's why,

Speaker:

you know, appreciating the totality of all

Speaker:

of those dynamics and influencing factors

Speaker:

is important. Again, going back to that quote, you can't let go of something unless

Speaker:

you know what it is, right? So it's

Speaker:

important to appreciate where these different categories

Speaker:

can help support that level of awareness so that you

Speaker:

could see the different aspects of my

Speaker:

orange-tinted glasses and what has contributed to the, the thickness

Speaker:

of them. So it's then subsequent to that is inviting clients to go on

Speaker:

a journey to say, If I were to list the

Speaker:

top 25 interpretations that I have about myself

Speaker:

that I project onto my partner in the

Speaker:

world, what would those be? How

Speaker:

does my, there's something wrong with me and I am

Speaker:

imperfect, you know, how is that really shaping and

Speaker:

driving some of the things that I'm very passionate about? Because the

Speaker:

sneaky thing with persona personality

Speaker:

types is that you can have supposed

Speaker:

strengths and liabilities or weaknesses. But

Speaker:

if you're not careful, both the positive

Speaker:

and the negative could be serving as

Speaker:

compensation patterns. And, you know, you start chasing after the positive and trying

Speaker:

to reduce the negative. But I've seen a lot and worked with

Speaker:

a lot of people that that

Speaker:

just entrenches their ideas, their

Speaker:

conditioned patterns even further, which is

Speaker:

another topic unto itself. But those are things

Speaker:

to consider, that it's not always just about

Speaker:

chasing after positivity and I need to be

Speaker:

positive. Especially when the positive is being sought

Speaker:

for the— to cover and overlook the idea that

Speaker:

I'm imperfect. So, man, that's so helpful. And I actually

Speaker:

love that exercise of listing out, you know, what

Speaker:

are the top— like, if you're listening to this right now, which obviously you are

Speaker:

if you're here, but listing out the top

Speaker:

25 interpretations, like, take a list, go, go to town. What are the

Speaker:

top 20, 20 to 25 assumptions that you're making? What are

Speaker:

your top limiting beliefs? And then bringing those in to have that even in partnership,

Speaker:

I think is invaluable because then as something comes up

Speaker:

and what also like to help the relationship, to

Speaker:

help myself, to help Lauren help herself if I can, to help both

Speaker:

of us. And there's also, I think, a big piece of

Speaker:

this around— you and I were talking about this when you were out

Speaker:

here, but like, I think this is also why it's really important to have a

Speaker:

skill and a practice of being able to

Speaker:

regulate ourselves. Right? Because it can be when we're in it and

Speaker:

two people are, say, age

Speaker:

regressing or stuck in a pattern. I think you— and I think, and correct

Speaker:

me if I'm wrong, but you were even talking like if both people are in

Speaker:

it, both people are completely overly identified with

Speaker:

their belief, one's I'm imperfect or one's I'm powerless or what, and they're bringing

Speaker:

both of that and they're blaming and they're shaming

Speaker:

and it's just, it's almost

Speaker:

impossible to navigate through that unless

Speaker:

maybe the charge goes down, or maybe we can view it from a

Speaker:

wider vantage point. Am I off on that, or is that right when I was—

Speaker:

when we were having that convo? Yeah, I mean, for me, absolutely.

Speaker:

Uh, it speaks to the earlier conversation we had

Speaker:

that when, uh, both are stuck in their

Speaker:

conditioning, yeah, uh, we, we cannot relate. We

Speaker:

can't connect. Yeah, we're, you know, uh, we're at

Speaker:

a fundamental disconnection because the only thing that

Speaker:

I hear, see, interpret is through the— through my lens, my

Speaker:

orange glasses. So it's better to figure out, okay, well,

Speaker:

well, what works for me in

Speaker:

stress moments like that? And I would encourage

Speaker:

clients to consider those questions in

Speaker:

between your triggers. Like, if that were to happen, like, use it as part

Speaker:

of the debrief with your partner. Can

Speaker:

we have an agreement that if both

Speaker:

are charged, we will do something? Now, you

Speaker:

could say, you raise, you could be as symbolic as take a

Speaker:

literal, not symbolic, but a literal step back. So

Speaker:

a step backwards is an external cue to say, I

Speaker:

can't verbalize, I'm so stuck, but I can take a step back.

Speaker:

And that's a cue to you that says, I need

Speaker:

some space. Now, for others, you

Speaker:

could say, like, it's basketball season, right? So take a timeout. Like, you could do

Speaker:

that symbol. You could just say, I can't handle this right now.

Speaker:

So can we Can we come back to

Speaker:

this? So have an agreement that says, okay, if both are

Speaker:

in our conditioned response, what is the symbol

Speaker:

or the gesture that we can make to each other that we

Speaker:

are saying, okay, we're going to off limits, we're going to give

Speaker:

each other fundamental space and we're going to agree

Speaker:

to that. So that becomes an agreement. So you just gave yourself an opportunity

Speaker:

to have that conversation with each other. And so when

Speaker:

it happens again, you could say, here, you could

Speaker:

be silent, you could take a step back, you could say, I can't handle this

Speaker:

right now. And then exercise that

Speaker:

agreement. If you have that agreement, and you're violating the agreement, then it

Speaker:

fosters that conversation, which is, hey, we had an agreement. It's not

Speaker:

like we don't know about this. What can we do to protect that agreement

Speaker:

moving forward? And you can work through that question, right? And

Speaker:

I would say that that's an important step. Now, there's

Speaker:

sometimes— I've shared this with you and Lauren also— that when

Speaker:

I am frustrated about something, before

Speaker:

I hit that tipping point of no return,

Speaker:

I will say to Zaina, can

Speaker:

I off-gas or The other question I asked to her is

Speaker:

really, is if I rip, are you going to be okay? Like, that's kind

Speaker:

of the phrase that I've used. Like, let it rip. Let

Speaker:

it rip. Yeah. If, if I share my

Speaker:

shit in this moment, are you stable

Speaker:

in your— are you regulated that you can handle it and not take

Speaker:

a personal attack? Because so we already have done a lot of that inner work

Speaker:

to know what our agreements are. And so she's like,

Speaker:

yep, bring it on, you know, and I

Speaker:

will rip. And she's holding space for me in that traditional sense of how we

Speaker:

use that phrase. And so you can

Speaker:

use whatever code you want. Can you hold space for me right now? Because it's

Speaker:

not going to be pretty. Yes, I can. Okay, cool. Then

Speaker:

I'm holding space. I have no judgment. I have no opinion. I'm not going to

Speaker:

defend myself. I'm not going to defend you. I'm just going to

Speaker:

allow you to do whatever it is that you need to

Speaker:

do. And then at the end, we have a phrase of,

Speaker:

are you complete? That's what Zaina could say to me. That's the permission

Speaker:

that we've— agreement that we have. So she says, okay, it's

Speaker:

a long pause. Is there anything else that you need, or do you

Speaker:

feel complete? Then I'll say, yeah, I got more. Here it comes.

Speaker:

Or no, I feel complete. And by that time, you know, it's

Speaker:

like anger, right? You feel the onset of the Hulk in you coming

Speaker:

out. You experience the Hulk, but at some point, the

Speaker:

green dude turns white again, right? In the old story of

Speaker:

he goes back to his normal pre-anger phase,

Speaker:

right? So by off-gassing, I start to calm down. I start to regulate. She's

Speaker:

so sure when she says, do you feel complete?

Speaker:

I'm like, Yeah, I've ripped my shirt, my

Speaker:

jeans. They're shrinking on me now. So I feel like I'm coming back

Speaker:

to myself. And then we debrief the conversation. She's like, I'm curious,

Speaker:

what was that all about? So we don't just part

Speaker:

ways. We— yeah, to the degree that we can. There's kids around and it's

Speaker:

not always ideal. But at some point,

Speaker:

we earmark that and say, can we debrief what was really going

Speaker:

on for you? And et cetera. And now I'm

Speaker:

able to— we're both to have the glasses off. And now we can get back

Speaker:

to that conversation. And I can

Speaker:

take responsibility for that. So the key is asking her, can

Speaker:

she hold space? If she says, no, I can't, and she's done this, I'm

Speaker:

not in the space to hold space for you. Yeah. Then I would say,

Speaker:

okay, cool. Then I'm going about my business. I'm going to

Speaker:

go for a walk. I'm gonna go fucking punch

Speaker:

a pillow. I'm going to go do something, to go work out. I'm going to

Speaker:

do a couple of sprints, or I'm just going to go sit and meditate. It

Speaker:

could be whatever works for the individual. But it's—

Speaker:

she's giving voice that I'm not in a space to hold space for

Speaker:

you. And then I go do what I can to self-regulate myself as best as

Speaker:

I can. And then when I feel like— I feel to my own question,

Speaker:

am I complete? And I say yes. Then I go back to her and I

Speaker:

say, hey, I feel complete. Do you feel complete yet

Speaker:

or not? If she says yes, then it's an opportunity. Then we

Speaker:

would debrief. She's like, no. Like, okay. And then at that

Speaker:

point, I'm offering her, do you want me to hold space for you or

Speaker:

do you want to still self-regulate all on your own? And she's

Speaker:

done both, right? No, I need space. Like, LMAO, leave

Speaker:

me alone. Like, all right, cool. But I don't take offense to it. Like, I

Speaker:

understand that's where she's at in her process. So hopefully that

Speaker:

is a tangible example for people to consider.

Speaker:

Yeah, that, that's super helpful. And just one more thing though on that,

Speaker:

Jay. So obviously you, you and Zayna both done a lot of

Speaker:

work individually and together and you know, you guys

Speaker:

have, have a lot of reps in this. For someone that's just tipping their, dipping

Speaker:

their toes in wanting to practice this, right?

Speaker:

Like, one of the things that was coming up when you were sharing

Speaker:

is— so imagine, um, say I come home and I do the same

Speaker:

thing with Lauren, right? Like, but— or she does it

Speaker:

with me, we can pick it either order— but the

Speaker:

venting or the let it rip is actually directed

Speaker:

at them. Like, you fucked up. Like, whatever. Like, really, I

Speaker:

don't know if we use whatever it is, but you're letting it rip and it's

Speaker:

directed at them. They say they can hold it, and then

Speaker:

real time, you know, stuff's coming up. So if

Speaker:

while they're holding, they no longer have the capacity

Speaker:

to hold, what would you do then? Or is that just discussed in the jury

Speaker:

bureau? And that point, just pause, like, then we're back in

Speaker:

it, pause. But when, when someone's just dipping their toes

Speaker:

into this, um, and they're struggling with that, what would you offer

Speaker:

to them? Um, so I think agreements— and I know that I've said this a

Speaker:

lot— is really important. Yeah. And I think and

Speaker:

feel like it's through the journey of figuring out

Speaker:

what agreements mean for each other. So

Speaker:

I always try to say, if to reduce

Speaker:

assumptions and ideas, take it a level up and

Speaker:

say Hey, how do we think about this idea Jason's sharing with Mike

Speaker:

around agreements? For us, does that

Speaker:

make sense? How are we doing with agreement? Do we even have them? Yes or

Speaker:

no? And if we do have them, are they truly an anchor for how we

Speaker:

function and interact with each other? You just get very curious and ask a lot

Speaker:

of questions. Then you can get into the weeds, right? That's getting into

Speaker:

the weeds. So That would be is as you're

Speaker:

noticing the attack feels too personal, intense, and

Speaker:

you feel triggered, the reality is they may come back

Speaker:

and say, you're a real pain in the ass. You're a bastard for blaming me

Speaker:

for that. Now they're sucked into the story, right?

Speaker:

Yeah. But rather than hiding from that, what I would encourage people to say

Speaker:

is, oh, great. It was an opportunity to say

Speaker:

I was present. What was it that sucked me

Speaker:

into this conversation that I couldn't maintain my

Speaker:

presence and debrief and have a conversation about that?

Speaker:

And so maybe, hey, listen, I know we're

Speaker:

both trying to put one foot in front of the other and start this as

Speaker:

a process. But for me right now, where I'm at in

Speaker:

my capacity, if you rip, you can't give me— I can't

Speaker:

give you full discretion yet. I might have to

Speaker:

give you 50%, and I will tell you when I'm

Speaker:

at my limit. And you just

Speaker:

negotiate that, and you just keep on tweaking it

Speaker:

over time with all of these conflicts that you might have. And you keep

Speaker:

tweaking and fine-tuning and fine-tuning. It's kind of like

Speaker:

that instrument, right? You, you, you're so sensitive to the keys

Speaker:

on the piano playing just right.. But

Speaker:

in the beginning, someone who doesn't have an acoustic ear is going to be like,

Speaker:

I guess that sounds fine. But then you play

Speaker:

it in the concert, you're like, oh no, no. Now that I hear it in

Speaker:

this kind of concert hall versus this

Speaker:

hall, et cetera, we need to adjust the keys. And so I

Speaker:

just think is, can you approach this from a

Speaker:

curious learner's heart and mind? Can I be curious about life?

Speaker:

And just always ask those open-ended questions of who, what, when, how, why.

Speaker:

Isn't that interesting? What did you feel in the body? Rather than

Speaker:

how do you think and feel like in the sense of like a

Speaker:

lot of overt thinking, because a lot of people will get stuck in their head.

Speaker:

But what did you experience in the body? So if my partner can

Speaker:

only have a threshold of 50%, say, what were you

Speaker:

feeling that really tipped you over in the body? Like, what were

Speaker:

you really sensing? Where did that come from? And Zayna would

Speaker:

probably say, well, my dad was really harsh on me, more than— the

Speaker:

story she has is more than her other sisters, and

Speaker:

therefore he was intense and blah, blah, blah. And, you know,

Speaker:

we've had that conversation before. So that's where I

Speaker:

would start. Start somewhere like, what do agreements look like?

Speaker:

Can we have agreements? How much should we invest in agreements? Can we

Speaker:

test this out? What would it look like for us? And let's give it a

Speaker:

shot. Not with the idea that us as Type Ones would say, we got to

Speaker:

nail this perfect on step one. You know,

Speaker:

that kind of thing. It is an

Speaker:

evolution and a journey. You know, Zane and I this June will

Speaker:

be together now, interestingly enough, 6 years. And

Speaker:

so, yes, we both had done a lot of work. We've both learned a tremendous

Speaker:

amount from the mistakes that the supposed mistakes, I'll say

Speaker:

it that way, that, that we made.

Speaker:

So we came packaged a little

Speaker:

different than our first

Speaker:

respective relationships. But that just helped us navigate all of

Speaker:

this space. And we, we've been fine-tuning it over

Speaker:

and over with subtleties throughout the

Speaker:

whole 6 years. So if you think it's like we're going to sprint, get it

Speaker:

over with and move on to the next thing, you

Speaker:

know, good luck. I don't find that to be the case. Now, what I would

Speaker:

say, though, is like anything else, right? When you go to the gym, you have

Speaker:

muscle memory. It'd be like asking

Speaker:

you with kettlebells, you know, you're a world-class

Speaker:

expert at it. So inherently, you've so entrained

Speaker:

yourself that your level of functionality with it by just walking

Speaker:

in the gym for the first time in even a couple of months, it's like

Speaker:

old hat, you know, it's like a bicycle ride, you know, you just don't

Speaker:

fundamentally forget it. So can I say that there are benefits like that

Speaker:

in the journey? Absolutely. Do what I

Speaker:

get upset about within myself about our relationship,

Speaker:

does it happen at times? Sure. But it's a hell

Speaker:

of a lot less frequent and less intense, and

Speaker:

we stay stuck in that space

Speaker:

a lot less. So those— just to throw the caveat

Speaker:

out there— that's a criteria that if you want to use like some

Speaker:

kind of objective, subjective, quantitative, qualitative data,

Speaker:

you could say, hey, I used to get triggered with my partner

Speaker:

about X. What's the frequency? Does it still happen at the same rate of

Speaker:

frequency? Yes, no. And you can ask each other this. When I

Speaker:

do get triggered, is it the same level of intensity? And the

Speaker:

third one is, is, does it— am I in that trigger

Speaker:

for hours, minutes, seconds, days? Like I used to be in

Speaker:

it for days. Now I'm in it for hours. Okay. So you can

Speaker:

use those three subjective criteria as a

Speaker:

way to assess, am I— how am I learning within

Speaker:

this journey? Of applying these kinds of techniques, if you will. You know, Jay,

Speaker:

I'm curious, is there ever a shadow side to agreements, or

Speaker:

does that even pertain to what we're talking about?

Speaker:

Yeah, good question, Mike. So the shadow side

Speaker:

of it is we've talked earlier today about functional and

Speaker:

dysfunctional elements of codependency. So for me, the

Speaker:

functional elements of agreements build dependency upon each other

Speaker:

to live in a world and in our environment and execute and

Speaker:

deal with life. The dysfunctional elements

Speaker:

of codependency, as through the lens of agreements, could mean is that

Speaker:

I've put my, my eggs

Speaker:

in the basket of this agreement, meaning

Speaker:

my own psychological peace, my

Speaker:

happiness, are now externalized onto and projected

Speaker:

onto these agreements. And then therefore my peace is only because we

Speaker:

have agreements in place, not because I have peace

Speaker:

within myself that these agreements are a reflection of that

Speaker:

already existing inner peace that I have, so that

Speaker:

if they become— if there's a

Speaker:

partial violation or a full violation, I don't lose my

Speaker:

serenity over it. It leads to a crucial conversation for sure, but I'm

Speaker:

not going to lose my inner peace over that. So I think that

Speaker:

is an element that people can watch out

Speaker:

for with, with making these

Speaker:

types of agreements. Um, yeah, and I— those are the important parts I

Speaker:

would say for now that people watch

Speaker:

out for with agreements. You know,

Speaker:

lulling yourself into psychological safety just because you have

Speaker:

an agreement. The other aspect, um, you know, when we

Speaker:

think about agreements and the words that we're

Speaker:

using I'm 54, Saina is 49. So I

Speaker:

have 54 years of

Speaker:

cumulative life experience that I project

Speaker:

consciously and even unconsciously onto

Speaker:

these agreements. We might be using the same word, we could say connection, as you

Speaker:

use the word before connection. Well, what does that mean for you? Well,

Speaker:

I have 54 years of a unique

Speaker:

fingerprint that says connection is this. Zaina

Speaker:

would say connection is this to me. So

Speaker:

even within agreements, sometimes we got to get into the nitty-gritty of

Speaker:

what do these terms mean for you and for me? Because if we

Speaker:

just say, hey, we want to have an agreement that we want to

Speaker:

always have connection, or whatever you fill in the blank,

Speaker:

that's 54 years of

Speaker:

loaded terminology, right? So it can be shallow in the sense

Speaker:

of not digging deep enough to understand the

Speaker:

totality of what I'm really meaning, thinking, and feeling and

Speaker:

experiencing in my conditioning that is being imposed upon

Speaker:

just one word. So that's just another thing to consider with

Speaker:

agreements as well. Yeah, and the weight that we're putting

Speaker:

on aspects of it and what we make it mean. Yeah, that's

Speaker:

fascinating, bro. Yeah, this has been so helpful. I've really

Speaker:

appreciated the depth the breadth and also the

Speaker:

practicality of the tools, and also to assess and check in. The other thing

Speaker:

that I really loved, just as a quick reflection, is

Speaker:

how much you went into agreements. So last week, or well,

Speaker:

now this week, but I released a whole show on

Speaker:

covert contracts. So just unspoken agreements. So this is

Speaker:

like such a beautiful— and then taking everything that

Speaker:

you went into and we went into today, and anybody who listened to last week's

Speaker:

episode, this will even— it was just take it to a whole new level. So

Speaker:

I just really loved where we explored

Speaker:

today. Um, as we wrap up, brother, what would you say, what would you love

Speaker:

to, to leave people with? You know, I'm certainly going to leave in the, in

Speaker:

the show notes the Inner Compass 9 assessment. I've talked about it many times

Speaker:

in the show. It's step one for the work

Speaker:

that I do. To understand and uncover and provide a language to a

Speaker:

lot of these patterns. But to leave people today, is there anything you want

Speaker:

to— like a take-home point or anything you want to reinforce as we

Speaker:

wrap today, my man? You know, there's

Speaker:

a— there's a quote that I really love. Feel free to

Speaker:

adapt, adopt, or abandon this one, but

Speaker:

it coincides with the conditioning and the persona and the masks

Speaker:

that we wear. We've adopted that the inner

Speaker:

compass and the Enneagram assessment helps us highlight those masks that we've been wearing

Speaker:

and how we're compensating, right?

Speaker:

But ultimately, the phrase goes like this:

Speaker:

we cannot become that which we already

Speaker:

are, and therefore we cannot be that

Speaker:

which we're not. So if people can just consider that

Speaker:

in light of our conversation and about the

Speaker:

masks that I wear. Who

Speaker:

am I? What am I? And that to

Speaker:

me would be a question worth considering.

Speaker:

I love it, man. Thank you so much. This has been super fun. Can't

Speaker:

wait to have Uncle Jay back in town. Maybe

Speaker:

there's another set of Matchbox Scars. But really, man,

Speaker:

just love, love, love, love getting to have you here and also drop in with

Speaker:

you. So appreciate you so much, man. Thank you again. Yeah, brother.

Speaker:

Hugs and kisses. Uh, send my love to the family. I will. I will. Peace.