You can use whatever code you want. Can you hold space for me right now?
Speaker:Because it's not going to be pretty. Yes, I can. Okay, cool. Then
Speaker:I'm holding space. I have no judgment. I have no opinion. I'm not going to
Speaker:defend myself. I'm not going to defend you. I'm just going to allow
Speaker:you to do whatever it is that you need to do.
Speaker:And then at the end, we have a phrase of, are you
Speaker:complete? Welcome to The King Within, a podcast for men who seem
Speaker:to have it all, yet feel like they're losing what matters most. I'm
Speaker:Mike Salemi, and I've been there. Successful on paper, but disconnected on
Speaker:the inside. This isn't about grinding harder. It's about mastering
Speaker:your emotions, leading with calm strength, and rebuilding
Speaker:trust at home. Each week we dive into real stories and tools for becoming
Speaker:the man your family runs towards, not away from, because you didn't
Speaker:build this life to lose yourself in it. This is The King Within. Let's do
Speaker:the work. So one thing that's really top of mind is
Speaker:challenge, challenge, fights, conflict
Speaker:like that, the energy of that and
Speaker:how that's experienced in relationship individually and in the
Speaker:relationship. But when you see— and let's see where this goes—
Speaker:but when you find a couple that gets stuck, let's say the
Speaker:same fight, we could come up, we can make an assumption whether it's around
Speaker:money, whether it's around I don't know, choices around food. But
Speaker:when a couple gets in the same fight over and over and
Speaker:over, can you start helping me and us start
Speaker:maybe peeling back the layers of what might actually
Speaker:be happening underneath of this repetitive
Speaker:conflict that tends to arise? Or what goes through your mind? Where do you, where
Speaker:do you tend to look or want to explore within that? It's the million-dollar
Speaker:question, I guess, right? So Widow, will we jump
Speaker:in with this one? So I would say one of the things that I'm most
Speaker:sensitive to is
Speaker:trying to first understand
Speaker:their biases, my bias,
Speaker:where I'm sensitive, where they may or may not be as sensitive
Speaker:to me, and understand that
Speaker:my historical conditioning creates a filter,
Speaker:a lens. A lot of times when I'm working with clients
Speaker:and couples, uh, most of them are old enough to remember Elton John
Speaker:and his psychedelic outfits and his glasses. So
Speaker:I refer to people in that regards— we wear these
Speaker:glasses, and if they are orange-tinted
Speaker:glasses We see the whole world through orange,
Speaker:and they might have purple-colored glasses, and they're seeing
Speaker:the world through purple. One of the things
Speaker:that begins the journey is we have
Speaker:to take the glasses off in order
Speaker:to gain some level of clarity.
Speaker:So for me, the colored glasses are our conditioned
Speaker:ideas about how we feel, what we believe,
Speaker:our limiting beliefs, our associations, how we've interpreted
Speaker:who or what we are as an individual since infancy and through
Speaker:childhood. That's reinforced. That
Speaker:evolves into then how I see others and I see the world.
Speaker:And in particular, we're talking about relationships. So
Speaker:really getting clear with both of them
Speaker:Understanding and on some level appreciating that,
Speaker:that then leads into until we take the
Speaker:glasses off, we truly—
Speaker:I have experienced we're not going to solve our
Speaker:problems at all. And
Speaker:what that looks like is, one, the courage and
Speaker:curiosity to say and experience what could be beyond
Speaker:the colors of these glasses. Is one
Speaker:factor. The other factor is, is
Speaker:that a lot of times people approach this where,
Speaker:well, if I just switch my glasses to a different color, will
Speaker:that help? And then that gets into just reshuffling. It's like
Speaker:a shell game we play with ourselves and try to
Speaker:repackage our historical conditioning, which that
Speaker:too, I feel like, doesn't reconcile the
Speaker:heart and the mind as to what's really going on with those underlying dynamics
Speaker:within the relationship. Relationship. And so it's an
Speaker:invitation and a journey for them individually to
Speaker:take off the glasses, which would be similar
Speaker:to psychological terms like coming out of one's
Speaker:psychological trance, meaning that I'm stuck in a
Speaker:psychological, emotional framework
Speaker:mentally and emotionally, and I just don't seem to be able to get out of
Speaker:it. I refer a lot of times to like being stuck in the rabbit hole.
Speaker:I've gone down and I just cannot see the left
Speaker:nor to the right. So it's about inviting them
Speaker:to come back out from that perspective.
Speaker:And we can get into the techniques that one could explore to do
Speaker:that. But unless both of them are—
Speaker:unless they're willing to take those glasses off
Speaker:and then look at the, quote, supposed problem,
Speaker:If both don't take the glasses off, then we're still talking
Speaker:over, through, under each other with our biases
Speaker:and our heart, our hurts and our conditioning. All
Speaker:of that is still active and present. And no matter how
Speaker:logical, grounded, or stoic I'm
Speaker:presenting something, it's not
Speaker:landing psychologically. They are present. Their eardrums
Speaker:hear the reverberation. They know that there's talk. But it's
Speaker:truly an interpretation of through my conditioned response.
Speaker:And so until that's addressed,
Speaker:it's very— I have found very difficult for
Speaker:relationships to get aligned and
Speaker:work through, transmute, overcome, address
Speaker:these conflicts that you were referring to that we have.
Speaker:So if I were to summarize it as A, acknowledge that we have
Speaker:glasses, that they're biased.
Speaker:Be willing to be curious and have the courage to take the
Speaker:glasses off genuinely.
Speaker:And then number 3, explore within myself
Speaker:where and how my conditioning makes it difficult for me to want to take those
Speaker:glasses off and want to keep them on because
Speaker:I've used that as a form of protection and safety.
Speaker:And we can get into that as well, but there's all kinds of
Speaker:whys. And then ultimately is then
Speaker:still addressing the conflict, but now
Speaker:with a fresh set of eyes and an open heart.
Speaker:And I feel like if both can— are willing
Speaker:to approach something similar to that, then
Speaker:there's hope to work through that, because then there is
Speaker:genuine no age to regress or no trance
Speaker:activated, we're not triggered, we're not— we've minimized
Speaker:how much I'm coming from a place of
Speaker:frustration, lack of belief, or an interpretation. That's
Speaker:how my dad used to handle that, or that's how my mom used to handle
Speaker:it. Now I've learned how to cope with that for this way. And those
Speaker:protections fall to the side, right? And then we can have an honest,
Speaker:a more honest conversation, and then we can be vulnerable. Yeah,
Speaker:I can say, I acknowledge my likes
Speaker:and biases are because I've been trying to protect myself in a
Speaker:relationship. And that's how I watched my parents relate, and
Speaker:I thought that that was a successful way to manage
Speaker:my approval of them. And now that I take the glasses off, I can
Speaker:see clearly. I can see, hey, I've— I'm operating—
Speaker:I had been operating in that way. And it's
Speaker:understandable that you might be frustrated with me from
Speaker:coming from that place. So then we start getting vulnerable.
Speaker:We start talking about our conditioning as if it's something
Speaker:that is acknowledged fully and you're
Speaker:considerate of how it's impacting the relationship. And then
Speaker:I feel like it's reciprocal. Then people start talking. Then the other person
Speaker:starts getting a little bit softer. And, and the next thing you know,
Speaker:we're dealing with the conflict. But like I said, with those fresh set of
Speaker:eyes and, and then that really brings about restoring,
Speaker:transmuting, healing, whatever word that fits for us. But
Speaker:there's a reconciliation of this conflict in a more meaningful
Speaker:way. And then you can approach it as such.
Speaker:The last thing I'll say here, Mike, is that I've experienced where
Speaker:if people still have a tinge of an agenda, it is, I
Speaker:need you to change. Like, I need you to acknowledge your conflict
Speaker:with me. And until you quote unquote change your
Speaker:literal behaviors, we're going to always have conflict.
Speaker:So it's almost like putting one
Speaker:foot in and one foot out of taking the glasses off. Yeah,
Speaker:a lot of times people are looking for the other to ensure that
Speaker:they make the changes to eliminate the
Speaker:conflict. Like if you, you need to do X, Y, and Z
Speaker:in order for this conflict to go away. So they're one foot in
Speaker:of taking the glasses partially off, and
Speaker:it's still, you know, on the tip of their nose, so to speak. They're kind
Speaker:of like bifocals at that point, you know, they could see beyond it,
Speaker:but there's a subtle agenda
Speaker:with this reconciliation part. So for
Speaker:me, until they fully take the glasses off, take
Speaker:responsibility for their part, really consider how their conditioning has been
Speaker:driving the bus on how they are seeing things through those orange or
Speaker:purple tinted glasses, remove them
Speaker:and be vulnerable, and also then work through
Speaker:the conflict. Because that gives you, if you will,
Speaker:no pun intended here, a fighting chance to work through the
Speaker:conflict. If not, you're still in
Speaker:and out of, and mostly out of or in, your age-regressed
Speaker:or trance or your old conditioned patterns.
Speaker:And that's when we can't resolve conflict. When you were
Speaker:talking about, like, I really appreciate the example of protecting,
Speaker:right? Like, and I think giving more color as we are
Speaker:continuing to give more color into some of the ways that this can look will
Speaker:be super helpful. And that piece that you
Speaker:just shared about expecting the other person to change, and I want to like
Speaker:define some terms as well. I know you and I were talking about that before.
Speaker:One of the things I'd love to hear when you're, when you're talking about I'm
Speaker:expecting the other person to change, can you break down like how would you define
Speaker:codependency, healthy codependency if there is such,
Speaker:unhealthy codependency, and that expectation that,
Speaker:or I'm doing this so that the other person will change or they have to
Speaker:change. Can you break down what is codependency to you and especially
Speaker:unhealthy codependency? Um, so codependency
Speaker:for me, I'll say there's multi-levels.
Speaker:So I would say in my
Speaker:relationship with Zayna, there are some
Speaker:physical codependencies that I have with her
Speaker:in relationship. So I am
Speaker:codependent upon her showing up and being physically present for us if
Speaker:we want to be intimate sexually and sensually. Uh, there's a
Speaker:dependency that I can lift heavy weight. So if
Speaker:we're moving or I need to carry things from the car upstairs,
Speaker:there's an inherent dependency on my contribution
Speaker:to our relationship. So for me,
Speaker:there, there's different levels. And those are just
Speaker:physical examples where I would say
Speaker:codependency, which is the typical language I
Speaker:think we've— we use within the realm of self-development
Speaker:and psychology and spirituality.
Speaker:Codependency, I would say
Speaker:99.9% of the time is dysfunctional,
Speaker:in my opinion. Yeah. And for me,
Speaker:if we think and feel like my partner is
Speaker:responsible to take away my mental and emotional
Speaker:and spiritual dissatisfaction with life or
Speaker:my pain or you fill in the blank.
Speaker:That to me is when it becomes very toxic, because
Speaker:we're looking for someone outside of ourselves
Speaker:to provide happiness, peace.
Speaker:That is more of a psychological-based
Speaker:understanding. So I am giving myself away
Speaker:in my psyche to the power of someone outside of myself
Speaker:to put something inside of me mentally or
Speaker:emotionally so that I can feel okay and good or
Speaker:satisfied or at least peaceful within
Speaker:myself. So to me, that's where the
Speaker:codependency is toxic,
Speaker:negative. I'm not sure the right word that lands, but I don't find it
Speaker:functional. Maybe that's a good word to say. I don't
Speaker:find that area of life codependency as being
Speaker:functional. We have to survive in some level
Speaker:within life, navigating life, paying the bills. So there's environmental
Speaker:factors. I'm codependent. My partner and her
Speaker:contributions, right or wrong, good or bad. So how
Speaker:do we take care of the home? How do we take care of kids? How
Speaker:do we get them this? How do we get them that? You know, there is
Speaker:an inherent dependency that people have upon each other. And I think those
Speaker:are functional and necessary to survive and thrive in life.
Speaker:It is ultimately that the psychological codependency
Speaker:that I think gets us into trouble, where we think,
Speaker:Mike, if you don't do X, Y, and Z,
Speaker:that satisfies all of Lauren's filters,
Speaker:conditions. It's almost like going through all these different tollgates, right,
Speaker:that you have to pass for her within her
Speaker:own mental and emotional well-being. For her to say, ah,
Speaker:Mike's a good guy, I'm not triggered. He's
Speaker:actually soothing. I'm using what Mike— my
Speaker:experience of Mike and soothing myself with it. And then
Speaker:therefore, sometimes you're the best husband in the world.
Speaker:And other times when you don't do X, Y, and Z and take away my
Speaker:inner conflict, you know, you're the worst guy in the world.
Speaker:And we all deal with that. And in I'm picking on you, but
Speaker:that applies to every, every relationship under the sun. And that's where I
Speaker:feel like this dependency criteria can be helpful
Speaker:when we look at it through multi-layers. That's
Speaker:fascinating, Jay, and I really appreciate that. And I want to—
Speaker:you know, there's something that comes up in the— at least
Speaker:like in, I would say, like, I don't know, the modern men's movement, like the
Speaker:men's work that I'm familiar with, and even just what I hear a lot in
Speaker:relationships. And there's— and I'm clearly
Speaker:generalizing here, right? But just for the sake of putting this out,
Speaker:let's just say a wife. A wife says, I
Speaker:don't feel safe with you. I don't trust you. I don't
Speaker:trust you because you're out of integrity, right? You're not
Speaker:doing, I don't know, certain things that you said you would do, or
Speaker:what a man of integrity lives. So I don't trust you. I don't feel safe.
Speaker:With you. And so if I'm to open up, if I'm to want
Speaker:to have, you know, intimacy or sex or whatever with what the man really wants—
Speaker:both people want, but let's say the man's really driving that— what's your
Speaker:thoughts on, uh, what's underneath that for both people?
Speaker:I need you to be a certain way so I can trust you more
Speaker:or feel safer with you. And yeah, I'll let you take it from there.
Speaker:Yeah, thanks, Mike.
Speaker:Um, I think the trusting in the
Speaker:lack of trust all begins and ends
Speaker:within oneself. So
Speaker:I'm always— my fundamental bias is that
Speaker:trust or no trust is still an inside job first
Speaker:and foremost. And so then the questions,
Speaker:it just becomes a journey to ask oneself, okay,
Speaker:is my lack of trust because I
Speaker:am interpreting all of these behaviors through an old
Speaker:pattern of conditioning that I have and ideas
Speaker:that I have with men or women,
Speaker:whatever the dynamics are? So
Speaker:exploring one's inner world about this concept
Speaker:around trust— what I trust, what I don't trust—
Speaker:I think is full stop. That's where the
Speaker:initial accountability and responsibility around trust needs to happen.
Speaker:I think if both of them, both persons,
Speaker:were to first look at, is my distrust
Speaker:on behalf of my conditioned patterns,
Speaker:or Is it on behalf of we, you and I have
Speaker:another option here is we both have an agreement. The agreement
Speaker:could be is we value
Speaker:quality time together. And
Speaker:we had, we had none this week, so to speak.
Speaker:And now you're choosing to go out with the boys and
Speaker:get drunk or party or stay out late or just socialize.
Speaker:It doesn't have to be drinking. And that would have
Speaker:been the only window this week of quality time, but you both have made
Speaker:an agreement that we will prioritize the relationship and its quality time is
Speaker:number one. Now, if that was repeatedly violated,
Speaker:so to speak, over and over again, uh, can
Speaker:someone draw the conclusion of a lack of trust about
Speaker:what that agreement means for each of them? Yes,
Speaker:that trust can erode from something very practical or of
Speaker:an existing agreement that you have. So then it would
Speaker:foster, ideally, a conversation about,
Speaker:we have an agreement. Can we just take a step back and say,
Speaker:what do agreements mean for us individually and then
Speaker:collectively? If we're going to treat
Speaker:this agreement with
Speaker:the level of trust and honor
Speaker:Are we vulnerable to every other agreement that we have? So can we
Speaker:have that conversation? So I think it leads to those
Speaker:hopeful conversations to take a step back and
Speaker:ask the bigger questions. And then you can get into
Speaker:getting into the very specific agreement that you have and say, my
Speaker:experience of this agreement to be honored is X. What
Speaker:is your— which— what's Y for you? And do we
Speaker:need to revisit this agreement? Maybe the agreement needs to be
Speaker:adapted. Maybe we need to get even more clarity
Speaker:about the practical application of this agreement so
Speaker:that my expectations and any
Speaker:ambiguity with this agreement that I had that I didn't maybe give as
Speaker:much voice to is further detailed or
Speaker:delineated so that we move forward
Speaker:with this revised agreement and learning
Speaker:from what it meant to have these experiences, our respective experiences with
Speaker:this lack of showing up for each other in whatever way that
Speaker:that might have looked like. So in summary, Mike, I think of it as
Speaker:the trust or no trust ultimately is a signal
Speaker:to the relationship that we need to have a heartfelt
Speaker:conversation. That's to me the number one
Speaker:criteria or a the number one indicator,
Speaker:rather than minimizing each other's perspectives
Speaker:and blowing off, et cetera.
Speaker:So, you know, those are some key things maybe worth considering. Yeah, I
Speaker:really appreciate that. Because when you were out here as well, like one of the
Speaker:questions when we were hanging out on the couch that you posed to Lauren and
Speaker:I, when we were just having a discussion, was the
Speaker:invitation for us to individually clarify and
Speaker:define what is connection. To each of us.
Speaker:And, uh, you know, Lauren, in the, in the lens of the,
Speaker:let's say, the Enneagram, Lauren's core type is a Type 2, the helper.
Speaker:As you know, my core type is a Type 1. The same for you and
Speaker:Zayna. I've also got clients that fall into this, basically
Speaker:the same, uh, pattern, let's just say.
Speaker:And what I'm hearing too is just the important— whether it's connection, whether it's trust,
Speaker:uh, whether it's integrity, like the importance of
Speaker:defining or clarifying, deepening
Speaker:individually what and how do we experience these things that
Speaker:we so deeply want, right? Like we want to, yes, trust. I think at
Speaker:the deepest level, trust ourselves, trust our experience of our partner, to feel
Speaker:connected with our partner. But I thought that was really profound because it's
Speaker:not a question that we really ever really
Speaker:explored, as wild as that is. And I would imagine many people too, I would
Speaker:say the vast majority, have not explored How they define
Speaker:that and then what can come up from that type
Speaker:of dialogue. And, um,
Speaker:so if you have thoughts on that, I'd love to hear, and I'd love to
Speaker:also, as an example, through,
Speaker:uh, using the Enneagram as like an
Speaker:identification or, uh, of patterns, let's say,
Speaker:I think the heart of what I'd love to ask is
Speaker:not only why is it so important to get this clarity in relationship, but
Speaker:also to— like, you, you had mentioned multiple times the
Speaker:filters. Can you give us some examples of those filters? And
Speaker:let's just say a Type 1 and a Type 2 in, in a scenario like
Speaker:this. Yeah, so just real
Speaker:quick, a couple of definitions of terms for ourselves, right? So
Speaker:just throw— I'll throw some names out there. So the American Psychological
Speaker:Association defines personality as Patterning of
Speaker:thinking, feeling, emoting, and behaving.
Speaker:So the personality assessment that I
Speaker:co-created helps us understand that through the
Speaker:lens of the Enneagram. So it takes the theory of personality,
Speaker:uh, personality types, personality methodology, and says,
Speaker:okay, within that umbrella, the Enneagram is just one
Speaker:way to do that. There are 9 personality types. From
Speaker:a personality perspective, all of them have a strength,
Speaker:strengths plural, and, and weaknesses. They're gender
Speaker:neutral, age neutral. You are born with
Speaker:a predisposition for one. All other
Speaker:8 come and go in regards to
Speaker:the intensity of how you either engage with
Speaker:that type or how you avoid that type or how you use
Speaker:them situationally. Uh, from there
Speaker:through childhood all the way up, um,
Speaker:we put on these personas, which is another
Speaker:way of saying a mask of ideas
Speaker:about how we see ourselves, others in the world. We take on these fundamental
Speaker:beliefs about ourselves. And in the
Speaker:world that I teach and coach on in regards to the
Speaker:Enneagram, so there's 9 different types. And yet there's 9
Speaker:core beliefs of a sense of lack,
Speaker:agitation, and separation that lead
Speaker:to your personality type's belief system as a result
Speaker:of that, right? So maybe just restate it as
Speaker:in, in infancy and early childhood, we have this sense of lack,
Speaker:separation, and agitation. It's a sensation. It's an experience
Speaker:in the body. As the nervous system matures,
Speaker:you know, I'm sure we've talked about this before with Luca. He sees an object,
Speaker:and in the beginning, he didn't see it as his or yours or anyone's. It
Speaker:was just— and it was just his. And there's a unicity
Speaker:around everything. There's just total
Speaker:one symbiotic engagement with life. And then as
Speaker:his nervous system matured, he started saying, my bottle or
Speaker:my toy. And I am different than the little boy
Speaker:when he's going to school and stuff like that. I'm different than mom and dad.
Speaker:So the nervous system matures, and with that maturity
Speaker:comes a shock to the body that I am
Speaker:separate. And then we are pre-verbal. We don't have all the skills
Speaker:that we supposedly have as an adult. And then there is this
Speaker:inherent or innate adoption of a
Speaker:belief about oneself that contributed to
Speaker:this sense of lack that I, that I'm experiencing as an
Speaker:early, early young kid. And so each of the 9 types
Speaker:experiences or codifies their belief about
Speaker:themselves through their 9 types. So for the Type 1, it is
Speaker:all of this is occurring because I must be imperfect and that there's something wrong
Speaker:with me. And then the Type 2 is this is
Speaker:going on in my life because I am worthless.
Speaker:And each of the 9 types: I am powerless, I am
Speaker:incomplete, I am inadequate. I can go on and on,
Speaker:but fill in the blank that each one has their core
Speaker:belief that they believe not only about themselves, but others
Speaker:that are projected onto others and projected onto the world.
Speaker:So when you— those are the glasses, right? I referred to
Speaker:earlier, Ellen Jarrin glasses. So You know, like each— you
Speaker:could think of each of the 9 types as having their own unique
Speaker:color of glasses. So the Type 1
Speaker:is orange, Type 2 is purple, red is for the 3,
Speaker:green is for the 4, so on. So when we, as a result, early on
Speaker:put on those glasses, then our environment and
Speaker:our experiences shape how thick those glasses become,
Speaker:which means how much we over-identify and become very
Speaker:rigid or myopic in seeing the world in that very biased
Speaker:manner. And that's when we have two people come together
Speaker:with different levels of thickness of glasses and different
Speaker:colors and a.k.a. different filters and conditioning
Speaker:are then clashing. Right. So that to me
Speaker:is a quick little summary of how that
Speaker:evolves into all of those dynamics. I like the
Speaker:visual of the thickness of the glasses. And so it was
Speaker:really just bringing it home in a a way that could, could
Speaker:paint a picture of how two types can use the
Speaker:awareness, right? Because I think in Wolinsky's book, which is a book that
Speaker:you recommended, something called like Intimate Relationships, I don't know if it
Speaker:was his stance or he was sharing from a teacher, but in there, and you've
Speaker:said this, like we first need to be aware of what
Speaker:we're trying to let go of, or it's helpful to be aware of what we're
Speaker:trying to let go of for us to let go of it. I'm paraphrasing. Yeah.
Speaker:You can't let go of something until you know what that is.
Speaker:Yeah. So if someone, and I think in part what would be
Speaker:really helpful because like even with this knowledge of, okay, I see the
Speaker:world, which I super resonate with, as there's something,
Speaker:or especially historically in a lot of the, when I think back to the
Speaker:most painful charged moments, the most difficult plant
Speaker:medicine experiences, when I look at my journal and I like review what was going
Speaker:on, I was like, wow, how I was interpreting what came up
Speaker:that event. When she said this, or when
Speaker:this business deal went this way, or when mom and dad did this,
Speaker:when I really felt into why did this affect me so
Speaker:deeply, and I dig deep enough, more often
Speaker:than not, I would touch on some aspect of like, wow, I really
Speaker:am petrified or was petrified. It made me feel somatically
Speaker:like I made a mistake or there's something wrong with
Speaker:me. And so I just realized, like, holy shit,
Speaker:like, the awareness of this when I'm in the shit, if I'm aware of
Speaker:it enough and I'm not completely like in the bottle
Speaker:per se, I can actually recognize like, oh
Speaker:damn, like I'm on the goggles right now. And so I think the
Speaker:awareness is key. And like, I've heard this from clients, like, how
Speaker:do I like, like, one, be aware of it? How in the fuck do I
Speaker:take this off? Like, to your point earlier, if
Speaker:I'm in relation, both people are charged,
Speaker:like that process of being aware and taking it off. I'd love for you to
Speaker:talk us through that, but let's use the example through maybe the
Speaker:1 and the 2 as an example for this. Yeah, sure. Uh, thanks for
Speaker:calibrating me there. Yeah. Um, yeah, so remember,
Speaker:so that the Type 1 is looking at it through that there is something wrong
Speaker:with me, I am imperfect. The fear of making mistakes
Speaker:and the shame of being bad. And bad meaning a character
Speaker:flaw, like I'm flawed with my character and my
Speaker:code. The Type 2 is coming from it through I
Speaker:feel, I believe, and the belief is so
Speaker:visceral. I mean, you can't negotiate with this. It has
Speaker:been believed in since childhood that I am worthless.
Speaker:I have the fear of being rejected. And the shame of not
Speaker:being valued, right? So when you have those ingredients, those,
Speaker:those are the glasses we're wearing. So how do you
Speaker:take the glasses off? Uh, part of it is, number
Speaker:one, is acknowledging that I have glasses to
Speaker:begin with. Um, that's got
Speaker:to be a prerequisite, number one.
Speaker:So, uh, One, well, that's why
Speaker:I use my assessment, which is to go through this with people so that
Speaker:they can see for themselves how their
Speaker:graph, their psychological fingerprint, is actually showing up in
Speaker:which of the 9 types they're using to protect themselves
Speaker:and to navigate life, and ultimately
Speaker:how they've been trying to overcome that which they believe
Speaker:about themselves, which creates a lot of this inner conflict.
Speaker:I believe this about myself deep down, a lot of times
Speaker:unconsciously, subconsciously. And yet what we're
Speaker:conscious of are these patterns of compensation
Speaker:for trying to disprove that which I believe about myself,
Speaker:which I really don't want to. But
Speaker:I'm at the mercy of all of that conditioning. So although
Speaker:the adult intellect might understand that 1
Speaker:1 2, the little boy in
Speaker:us might say, no, that's 8. And we're going to still live
Speaker:from the place that it's 8, right? So
Speaker:step number 1 is being really
Speaker:clear or having that presented to them for them
Speaker:to consider ways in which they have not considered
Speaker:those pattern conditions. To the quote you were
Speaker:just referencing, you can't let go of something unless you know what it
Speaker:is. So, you know, Carl Jung and other people make the quote and
Speaker:references, until you bring the conscious to light, you're going to call
Speaker:it fate, etc., that famous quote. So I
Speaker:find that's very, very similar, right? So we have to
Speaker:first come to terms with what are the patterns that
Speaker:I'm in, I've engaged in throughout life, and
Speaker:then really start reflecting on, well, what is that
Speaker:core, most fundamental primal belief that
Speaker:I've adopted since early, early childhood. For us, Mike, the
Speaker:Type 1 is, I'm imperfect, there's something wrong with me. And for
Speaker:the Type 2, it's, I am, or I am worthless. So until
Speaker:I can see those patternings come
Speaker:up for myself, then yes, I have that level
Speaker:of awareness. Belaboring that point, but that's step number 1.
Speaker:Step number 2 is then saying, I'm going
Speaker:to stop, hold up, and I'm going
Speaker:to put— pump the brakes, so to speak. Now,
Speaker:I use a metaphor sometimes. You might be historically in
Speaker:a speedboat, and initially you throw that speedboat
Speaker:into neutral. The wake of the boat is still going to carry you forward to
Speaker:some degree, but you begin— so it's not typically a
Speaker:hard stop, like you don't just start changing patterns of 30 and
Speaker:40 and 50 years at the drop of a hat.
Speaker:So it becomes a process. And you—
Speaker:I would encourage everyone to be patient,
Speaker:to undo what's been done for decades. So it's like throwing
Speaker:that boat into neutral. The wake of the boat's still going to carry it,
Speaker:but the velocity, the intensity starts diminishing over time, and
Speaker:eventually the boat comes to a standstill, right? So one,
Speaker:we become aware of the pattern, and two, we start inquiring and saying,
Speaker:I got it, I just need to stop. I know what this pattern is like.
Speaker:I know the consequences and the benefits that I've
Speaker:used this patterning from. Ideally, you've done a little bit of that work
Speaker:with a coach. And then you could say, okay, I'm just going
Speaker:to stop indulging in that pattern and give yourself
Speaker:a chance to rewire into
Speaker:a new entrainment, a new pathway for
Speaker:you to reconsider what's going on in
Speaker:your environment. And that, can I consider that
Speaker:there's another alternative to the pattern that I've indulged in for
Speaker:a long, long time that has been conflictual
Speaker:within relationship? So that would be step number 2. Then step number 3 would
Speaker:be is inquire. Looking
Speaker:at, hey, am I coming from a place of
Speaker:compensation? You ask a lot of open-ended questions— who, what, when, how, and why, right?
Speaker:Am I coming from a place of compensation? Am I really
Speaker:trying to protect myself? On whose behalf am
Speaker:I trying to protect myself? The little conditioned parts
Speaker:of me, or am I truly representing the adult Mike
Speaker:or the adult Jason in
Speaker:this relationship? And that's a pretty interesting experience to
Speaker:really— some people will say, how old do I feel? Is another good
Speaker:question to experience
Speaker:for themselves. And then we can get into certain
Speaker:techniques like dismantling. You want
Speaker:to— well, I'll be careful with terms here, but dismantling,
Speaker:meaning breaking up that pattern. Yeah, just to be clear.
Speaker:And the another, the next step to me is becoming
Speaker:the witness or the observer with
Speaker:observing that patterning. So no longer being
Speaker:a full-blown participant, but the witness or
Speaker:the observer element within yourself to see it like a movie
Speaker:on a screen rather than being sucked into the
Speaker:movie and the screen. You become more I know
Speaker:this is playing itself out. I'm
Speaker:witnessing it. I joke with myself and clients that I work with. I'm like,
Speaker:get your popcorn ready because you're going to have a lot of observations and
Speaker:witnessing your conditioning wanting to still go
Speaker:in certain patterns, right? Another phrase I'll use
Speaker:sometimes is it's like emotional gravity.
Speaker:There's an inherent gravitational pull
Speaker:emotionally to go in that old pattern. And at times
Speaker:it feels uncomfortable, but helping become the witness
Speaker:or the observer of that old
Speaker:pattern is giving you the ability to create
Speaker:space. And we get so absorbed in this character,
Speaker:the persona, how we act out from those, those,
Speaker:that personality perspective, that it's really important for us
Speaker:to create psychological muscle
Speaker:to create separation from the event, the situation, the
Speaker:thought, the sensation in the body, the emotion, the
Speaker:words that maybe Lauren shares with you, the words that Zaina
Speaker:shares with me, to take them
Speaker:as objects within our experience and not absorb them
Speaker:as if it's my identity. And I think that's
Speaker:a really important process because
Speaker:until you create that
Speaker:separation initially, that's synonymous with our earlier part of the conversation. It helps you come
Speaker:out of that rabbit hole. It helps you come out of that
Speaker:myopic perspective that gets us all into trouble. It keeps those glasses
Speaker:on where once you can create separation and become the observer
Speaker:of your experience, that's affording you
Speaker:the opportunity to take the glasses
Speaker:off. Because, you know, the glasses are thoughts, ideas,
Speaker:limiting beliefs, associations, interpretations of myself, others in
Speaker:the world under the all pretense. And so by
Speaker:creating space, it allows me to take the glasses
Speaker:off. Then we typically will be in our parasympathetic nervous system. We can
Speaker:start to regulate ourselves, start to relax more
Speaker:into the present moment, and then we can start
Speaker:thinking of alternatives. How else? And then once you start asking ourselves
Speaker:these open-ended questions, you could say, well, how else could I have
Speaker:understood this situation? What,
Speaker:from her perspective, is she really trying to share with me in this moment, if
Speaker:I were to guess? You know, until we do this separation
Speaker:and observe our phenomena,
Speaker:we— it's a Answering that question
Speaker:honestly becomes labor. It's very, very
Speaker:difficult. And I know that I've done a lot of exercises with myself
Speaker:and with clients to know that it almost feels like
Speaker:a ripping. If I, if I could say it that way,
Speaker:it feels intense and almost like you're
Speaker:trying to peel off an old t-shirt that's wet. And,
Speaker:you know, it sticks to the body and you're trying to take it, like, but
Speaker:once you take it off, it's like, whoa, like the
Speaker:world changes, your countenance changes, your
Speaker:eyes change. You know, there's a lot, a lot
Speaker:that happens. And then you can say, how do we solve this
Speaker:problem? You're no longer under the influence of your glasses
Speaker:now. And that observer phenomena allows you to do that.
Speaker:I think in a way that's empowering, graceful.
Speaker:And the last thing I'll say is, once you've had a taste
Speaker:of it, and you've had a couple of experiences with
Speaker:doing that, it's kind of like you can't undo what has
Speaker:been done. Yeah, you know, you can't undo that
Speaker:visceral experience. So then you say, ah, now I know what it's like
Speaker:in the body to experience taking the shirt
Speaker:off that's been stuck to me. Or taking the
Speaker:glasses off and how I can actually solve the conflict with my partner in
Speaker:a way that's
Speaker:meaningful, fulfilling, brings about deeper connectivity
Speaker:because you've removed all the things that created or facilitated
Speaker:disconnection, so to speak. So the only thing that's left is
Speaker:your essence, her essence. And now you can connect at
Speaker:that level and then trying to troubleshoot who's going to pick up the
Speaker:kid on Tuesdays, just like you did,
Speaker:it makes it comical. Like, you kind of laugh. Okay, well, who's going to do
Speaker:it? How do you want to do it? Okay, cool. I'll pick them up. No
Speaker:problem. Not to suggest that everything goes away that quickly, but
Speaker:just to piggyback on the idea that the ability
Speaker:to problem solve the dynamics or resolve
Speaker:or reconcile becomes so much easier and
Speaker:leads and facilitates to more
Speaker:connection. Man, as you were sharing that, a few things
Speaker:came up, one of which is I think you use the word like labor. Like,
Speaker:it is in my experience, and I've got more
Speaker:compassion for myself, for Lauren, for us in relationship,
Speaker:for clients, the more that I learn about this and just realize
Speaker:I have 39 years of conditioning right? And then I
Speaker:have my whole relationship dynamic, and we've fallen into
Speaker:our own patterns, and she's got her whole life. And so just
Speaker:to really anchor in, like, how much of a process
Speaker:and that ripping of this can be. And you used a few
Speaker:times, like, assumptions, interpretations, and limiting beliefs. And I
Speaker:want to define some of those terms, which in my training with you,
Speaker:like, you speak about 4 main energy blocks. So I want to define
Speaker:that. But one, one story, real brief, that comes up
Speaker:is I remember even after having that, like, even after
Speaker:having this knowledge, it can still be really hard
Speaker:for me personally. And I remember we were in the kitchen,
Speaker:uh, I think Luca must have been like
Speaker:1, and, uh, I was on my phone doing something. I don't know, it was
Speaker:work, it was something. Let's just say it was something important. And Lauren was
Speaker:doing the dishes and Luca wanted to get my attention, but I was absorbed in
Speaker:the phone and I didn't even realize that he was there going,
Speaker:Papa, Papa. It really— that's one of the things that really triggers Lauren. And I
Speaker:know it also stems from not just like her values, but
Speaker:also what she experienced growing up and her experience of that. But it brought up
Speaker:in her whether it was I was rejecting him, um,
Speaker:but she said like— and I don't even recall the tone of which it was
Speaker:in, but I remember some of the effect
Speaker:of like, um, he's trying to get his— you're not paying attention. That was it,
Speaker:like, you're not paying attention. And it was so wild
Speaker:because I remember her words, and then I still
Speaker:viscerally remember immediately, immediately what I made it mean. And it
Speaker:was, it was as if she literally said, you're a
Speaker:bad father. That's how it was experienced to me, and that's
Speaker:what I internalized. And then I went through my own
Speaker:downward spiral. I remember like a day or something like that, and I was withdrawn,
Speaker:I was quiet, I was beating myself up, and
Speaker:then projecting onto her. So I was in my— I was lost in the
Speaker:sauce, right? And she had no way, by no way, shape, or form— we had
Speaker:the discussion after, she's like, you're a fantastic father. And I explained to her
Speaker:like how I experienced that and what I was making
Speaker:it mean. And I want to use that as an example to tee up
Speaker:the energy blocks and to have you define those and how those show
Speaker:up in relationship. Yeah,
Speaker:thanks, Mike. So there are the—
Speaker:this notion of a gremlin, they call it a gremlin, or you can call
Speaker:it a false core, a false belief, which we refer
Speaker:to as for the Type 2 is I am worthless, and for the Type
Speaker:1, I am imperfect. So it's a
Speaker:belief system and core beliefs and vows that you've
Speaker:taken on about self, others, and
Speaker:the world. Associations are
Speaker:simply associating current-day events
Speaker:through your historical experiences. And
Speaker:that could be, in some regards,
Speaker:similar to what you were giving voice
Speaker:to. Although interpretations is another one, which is really judgments
Speaker:of self and others that you were taught as a youngster.
Speaker:So you're interpreting it through those filters of judgments and ideas of what's
Speaker:right and what's wrong. And then limiting
Speaker:beliefs are those
Speaker:lesser, stingy, but still energetic beliefs and
Speaker:ideas. They're concepts that
Speaker:you— or sometimes people will call them— I'll even go out on a limb here
Speaker:and say identities. They
Speaker:are ideas that you believe about yourself that
Speaker:may not raise as intense as the level of I
Speaker:am imperfect, but they are associated with, in many ways,
Speaker:the voice in the head of I could have done
Speaker:this better. This is not fair. People who
Speaker:do this are not as good as people who do that. Those tend
Speaker:to be examples of limiting beliefs. So All
Speaker:of those, to simply say, is there
Speaker:are innate patterns of
Speaker:thinking, sensing, perceiving, and
Speaker:fee— and emoting that really speak
Speaker:to the different categories of our psyche, if
Speaker:you will, that have an
Speaker:energetic signature to them. And then
Speaker:that energy feels very sticky or gooey, although it feels
Speaker:normal and comfortable,
Speaker:right? There's sometimes a heaviness
Speaker:about it. So, you know, those to me is all of
Speaker:that, the sum of all of those different
Speaker:ideas, beliefs, associations. I even, I get the sense
Speaker:of even like a heaviness even listing them. I mean, it feels like a laundry
Speaker:list, for crying out loud, right? Yeah. Then you take
Speaker:it where I have this tension in the body, I have this
Speaker:physical left knee pain, or you get
Speaker:into emotions. It's like I have this sense of anger. There are times
Speaker:that I could flip a switch and have absolute rage and want to just punch
Speaker:someone in the face. You know, all of those
Speaker:are just the totality
Speaker:of our, of our energetic signature,
Speaker:our psychological fingerprint that we're walking
Speaker:around with consciously and unconsciously about how we're
Speaker:trying to navigate life. And so it can
Speaker:be quite, quite tricky. And that's why,
Speaker:you know, appreciating the totality of all
Speaker:of those dynamics and influencing factors
Speaker:is important. Again, going back to that quote, you can't let go of something unless
Speaker:you know what it is, right? So it's
Speaker:important to appreciate where these different categories
Speaker:can help support that level of awareness so that you
Speaker:could see the different aspects of my
Speaker:orange-tinted glasses and what has contributed to the, the thickness
Speaker:of them. So it's then subsequent to that is inviting clients to go on
Speaker:a journey to say, If I were to list the
Speaker:top 25 interpretations that I have about myself
Speaker:that I project onto my partner in the
Speaker:world, what would those be? How
Speaker:does my, there's something wrong with me and I am
Speaker:imperfect, you know, how is that really shaping and
Speaker:driving some of the things that I'm very passionate about? Because the
Speaker:sneaky thing with persona personality
Speaker:types is that you can have supposed
Speaker:strengths and liabilities or weaknesses. But
Speaker:if you're not careful, both the positive
Speaker:and the negative could be serving as
Speaker:compensation patterns. And, you know, you start chasing after the positive and trying
Speaker:to reduce the negative. But I've seen a lot and worked with
Speaker:a lot of people that that
Speaker:just entrenches their ideas, their
Speaker:conditioned patterns even further, which is
Speaker:another topic unto itself. But those are things
Speaker:to consider, that it's not always just about
Speaker:chasing after positivity and I need to be
Speaker:positive. Especially when the positive is being sought
Speaker:for the— to cover and overlook the idea that
Speaker:I'm imperfect. So, man, that's so helpful. And I actually
Speaker:love that exercise of listing out, you know, what
Speaker:are the top— like, if you're listening to this right now, which obviously you are
Speaker:if you're here, but listing out the top
Speaker:25 interpretations, like, take a list, go, go to town. What are the
Speaker:top 20, 20 to 25 assumptions that you're making? What are
Speaker:your top limiting beliefs? And then bringing those in to have that even in partnership,
Speaker:I think is invaluable because then as something comes up
Speaker:and what also like to help the relationship, to
Speaker:help myself, to help Lauren help herself if I can, to help both
Speaker:of us. And there's also, I think, a big piece of
Speaker:this around— you and I were talking about this when you were out
Speaker:here, but like, I think this is also why it's really important to have a
Speaker:skill and a practice of being able to
Speaker:regulate ourselves. Right? Because it can be when we're in it and
Speaker:two people are, say, age
Speaker:regressing or stuck in a pattern. I think you— and I think, and correct
Speaker:me if I'm wrong, but you were even talking like if both people are in
Speaker:it, both people are completely overly identified with
Speaker:their belief, one's I'm imperfect or one's I'm powerless or what, and they're bringing
Speaker:both of that and they're blaming and they're shaming
Speaker:and it's just, it's almost
Speaker:impossible to navigate through that unless
Speaker:maybe the charge goes down, or maybe we can view it from a
Speaker:wider vantage point. Am I off on that, or is that right when I was—
Speaker:when we were having that convo? Yeah, I mean, for me, absolutely.
Speaker:Uh, it speaks to the earlier conversation we had
Speaker:that when, uh, both are stuck in their
Speaker:conditioning, yeah, uh, we, we cannot relate. We
Speaker:can't connect. Yeah, we're, you know, uh, we're at
Speaker:a fundamental disconnection because the only thing that
Speaker:I hear, see, interpret is through the— through my lens, my
Speaker:orange glasses. So it's better to figure out, okay, well,
Speaker:well, what works for me in
Speaker:stress moments like that? And I would encourage
Speaker:clients to consider those questions in
Speaker:between your triggers. Like, if that were to happen, like, use it as part
Speaker:of the debrief with your partner. Can
Speaker:we have an agreement that if both
Speaker:are charged, we will do something? Now, you
Speaker:could say, you raise, you could be as symbolic as take a
Speaker:literal, not symbolic, but a literal step back. So
Speaker:a step backwards is an external cue to say, I
Speaker:can't verbalize, I'm so stuck, but I can take a step back.
Speaker:And that's a cue to you that says, I need
Speaker:some space. Now, for others, you
Speaker:could say, like, it's basketball season, right? So take a timeout. Like, you could do
Speaker:that symbol. You could just say, I can't handle this right now.
Speaker:So can we Can we come back to
Speaker:this? So have an agreement that says, okay, if both are
Speaker:in our conditioned response, what is the symbol
Speaker:or the gesture that we can make to each other that we
Speaker:are saying, okay, we're going to off limits, we're going to give
Speaker:each other fundamental space and we're going to agree
Speaker:to that. So that becomes an agreement. So you just gave yourself an opportunity
Speaker:to have that conversation with each other. And so when
Speaker:it happens again, you could say, here, you could
Speaker:be silent, you could take a step back, you could say, I can't handle this
Speaker:right now. And then exercise that
Speaker:agreement. If you have that agreement, and you're violating the agreement, then it
Speaker:fosters that conversation, which is, hey, we had an agreement. It's not
Speaker:like we don't know about this. What can we do to protect that agreement
Speaker:moving forward? And you can work through that question, right? And
Speaker:I would say that that's an important step. Now, there's
Speaker:sometimes— I've shared this with you and Lauren also— that when
Speaker:I am frustrated about something, before
Speaker:I hit that tipping point of no return,
Speaker:I will say to Zaina, can
Speaker:I off-gas or The other question I asked to her is
Speaker:really, is if I rip, are you going to be okay? Like, that's kind
Speaker:of the phrase that I've used. Like, let it rip. Let
Speaker:it rip. Yeah. If, if I share my
Speaker:shit in this moment, are you stable
Speaker:in your— are you regulated that you can handle it and not take
Speaker:a personal attack? Because so we already have done a lot of that inner work
Speaker:to know what our agreements are. And so she's like,
Speaker:yep, bring it on, you know, and I
Speaker:will rip. And she's holding space for me in that traditional sense of how we
Speaker:use that phrase. And so you can
Speaker:use whatever code you want. Can you hold space for me right now? Because it's
Speaker:not going to be pretty. Yes, I can. Okay, cool. Then
Speaker:I'm holding space. I have no judgment. I have no opinion. I'm not going to
Speaker:defend myself. I'm not going to defend you. I'm just going to
Speaker:allow you to do whatever it is that you need to
Speaker:do. And then at the end, we have a phrase of,
Speaker:are you complete? That's what Zaina could say to me. That's the permission
Speaker:that we've— agreement that we have. So she says, okay, it's
Speaker:a long pause. Is there anything else that you need, or do you
Speaker:feel complete? Then I'll say, yeah, I got more. Here it comes.
Speaker:Or no, I feel complete. And by that time, you know, it's
Speaker:like anger, right? You feel the onset of the Hulk in you coming
Speaker:out. You experience the Hulk, but at some point, the
Speaker:green dude turns white again, right? In the old story of
Speaker:he goes back to his normal pre-anger phase,
Speaker:right? So by off-gassing, I start to calm down. I start to regulate. She's
Speaker:so sure when she says, do you feel complete?
Speaker:I'm like, Yeah, I've ripped my shirt, my
Speaker:jeans. They're shrinking on me now. So I feel like I'm coming back
Speaker:to myself. And then we debrief the conversation. She's like, I'm curious,
Speaker:what was that all about? So we don't just part
Speaker:ways. We— yeah, to the degree that we can. There's kids around and it's
Speaker:not always ideal. But at some point,
Speaker:we earmark that and say, can we debrief what was really going
Speaker:on for you? And et cetera. And now I'm
Speaker:able to— we're both to have the glasses off. And now we can get back
Speaker:to that conversation. And I can
Speaker:take responsibility for that. So the key is asking her, can
Speaker:she hold space? If she says, no, I can't, and she's done this, I'm
Speaker:not in the space to hold space for you. Yeah. Then I would say,
Speaker:okay, cool. Then I'm going about my business. I'm going to
Speaker:go for a walk. I'm gonna go fucking punch
Speaker:a pillow. I'm going to go do something, to go work out. I'm going to
Speaker:do a couple of sprints, or I'm just going to go sit and meditate. It
Speaker:could be whatever works for the individual. But it's—
Speaker:she's giving voice that I'm not in a space to hold space for
Speaker:you. And then I go do what I can to self-regulate myself as best as
Speaker:I can. And then when I feel like— I feel to my own question,
Speaker:am I complete? And I say yes. Then I go back to her and I
Speaker:say, hey, I feel complete. Do you feel complete yet
Speaker:or not? If she says yes, then it's an opportunity. Then we
Speaker:would debrief. She's like, no. Like, okay. And then at that
Speaker:point, I'm offering her, do you want me to hold space for you or
Speaker:do you want to still self-regulate all on your own? And she's
Speaker:done both, right? No, I need space. Like, LMAO, leave
Speaker:me alone. Like, all right, cool. But I don't take offense to it. Like, I
Speaker:understand that's where she's at in her process. So hopefully that
Speaker:is a tangible example for people to consider.
Speaker:Yeah, that, that's super helpful. And just one more thing though on that,
Speaker:Jay. So obviously you, you and Zayna both done a lot of
Speaker:work individually and together and you know, you guys
Speaker:have, have a lot of reps in this. For someone that's just tipping their, dipping
Speaker:their toes in wanting to practice this, right?
Speaker:Like, one of the things that was coming up when you were sharing
Speaker:is— so imagine, um, say I come home and I do the same
Speaker:thing with Lauren, right? Like, but— or she does it
Speaker:with me, we can pick it either order— but the
Speaker:venting or the let it rip is actually directed
Speaker:at them. Like, you fucked up. Like, whatever. Like, really, I
Speaker:don't know if we use whatever it is, but you're letting it rip and it's
Speaker:directed at them. They say they can hold it, and then
Speaker:real time, you know, stuff's coming up. So if
Speaker:while they're holding, they no longer have the capacity
Speaker:to hold, what would you do then? Or is that just discussed in the jury
Speaker:bureau? And that point, just pause, like, then we're back in
Speaker:it, pause. But when, when someone's just dipping their toes
Speaker:into this, um, and they're struggling with that, what would you offer
Speaker:to them? Um, so I think agreements— and I know that I've said this a
Speaker:lot— is really important. Yeah. And I think and
Speaker:feel like it's through the journey of figuring out
Speaker:what agreements mean for each other. So
Speaker:I always try to say, if to reduce
Speaker:assumptions and ideas, take it a level up and
Speaker:say Hey, how do we think about this idea Jason's sharing with Mike
Speaker:around agreements? For us, does that
Speaker:make sense? How are we doing with agreement? Do we even have them? Yes or
Speaker:no? And if we do have them, are they truly an anchor for how we
Speaker:function and interact with each other? You just get very curious and ask a lot
Speaker:of questions. Then you can get into the weeds, right? That's getting into
Speaker:the weeds. So That would be is as you're
Speaker:noticing the attack feels too personal, intense, and
Speaker:you feel triggered, the reality is they may come back
Speaker:and say, you're a real pain in the ass. You're a bastard for blaming me
Speaker:for that. Now they're sucked into the story, right?
Speaker:Yeah. But rather than hiding from that, what I would encourage people to say
Speaker:is, oh, great. It was an opportunity to say
Speaker:I was present. What was it that sucked me
Speaker:into this conversation that I couldn't maintain my
Speaker:presence and debrief and have a conversation about that?
Speaker:And so maybe, hey, listen, I know we're
Speaker:both trying to put one foot in front of the other and start this as
Speaker:a process. But for me right now, where I'm at in
Speaker:my capacity, if you rip, you can't give me— I can't
Speaker:give you full discretion yet. I might have to
Speaker:give you 50%, and I will tell you when I'm
Speaker:at my limit. And you just
Speaker:negotiate that, and you just keep on tweaking it
Speaker:over time with all of these conflicts that you might have. And you keep
Speaker:tweaking and fine-tuning and fine-tuning. It's kind of like
Speaker:that instrument, right? You, you, you're so sensitive to the keys
Speaker:on the piano playing just right.. But
Speaker:in the beginning, someone who doesn't have an acoustic ear is going to be like,
Speaker:I guess that sounds fine. But then you play
Speaker:it in the concert, you're like, oh no, no. Now that I hear it in
Speaker:this kind of concert hall versus this
Speaker:hall, et cetera, we need to adjust the keys. And so I
Speaker:just think is, can you approach this from a
Speaker:curious learner's heart and mind? Can I be curious about life?
Speaker:And just always ask those open-ended questions of who, what, when, how, why.
Speaker:Isn't that interesting? What did you feel in the body? Rather than
Speaker:how do you think and feel like in the sense of like a
Speaker:lot of overt thinking, because a lot of people will get stuck in their head.
Speaker:But what did you experience in the body? So if my partner can
Speaker:only have a threshold of 50%, say, what were you
Speaker:feeling that really tipped you over in the body? Like, what were
Speaker:you really sensing? Where did that come from? And Zayna would
Speaker:probably say, well, my dad was really harsh on me, more than— the
Speaker:story she has is more than her other sisters, and
Speaker:therefore he was intense and blah, blah, blah. And, you know,
Speaker:we've had that conversation before. So that's where I
Speaker:would start. Start somewhere like, what do agreements look like?
Speaker:Can we have agreements? How much should we invest in agreements? Can we
Speaker:test this out? What would it look like for us? And let's give it a
Speaker:shot. Not with the idea that us as Type Ones would say, we got to
Speaker:nail this perfect on step one. You know,
Speaker:that kind of thing. It is an
Speaker:evolution and a journey. You know, Zane and I this June will
Speaker:be together now, interestingly enough, 6 years. And
Speaker:so, yes, we both had done a lot of work. We've both learned a tremendous
Speaker:amount from the mistakes that the supposed mistakes, I'll say
Speaker:it that way, that, that we made.
Speaker:So we came packaged a little
Speaker:different than our first
Speaker:respective relationships. But that just helped us navigate all of
Speaker:this space. And we, we've been fine-tuning it over
Speaker:and over with subtleties throughout the
Speaker:whole 6 years. So if you think it's like we're going to sprint, get it
Speaker:over with and move on to the next thing, you
Speaker:know, good luck. I don't find that to be the case. Now, what I would
Speaker:say, though, is like anything else, right? When you go to the gym, you have
Speaker:muscle memory. It'd be like asking
Speaker:you with kettlebells, you know, you're a world-class
Speaker:expert at it. So inherently, you've so entrained
Speaker:yourself that your level of functionality with it by just walking
Speaker:in the gym for the first time in even a couple of months, it's like
Speaker:old hat, you know, it's like a bicycle ride, you know, you just don't
Speaker:fundamentally forget it. So can I say that there are benefits like that
Speaker:in the journey? Absolutely. Do what I
Speaker:get upset about within myself about our relationship,
Speaker:does it happen at times? Sure. But it's a hell
Speaker:of a lot less frequent and less intense, and
Speaker:we stay stuck in that space
Speaker:a lot less. So those— just to throw the caveat
Speaker:out there— that's a criteria that if you want to use like some
Speaker:kind of objective, subjective, quantitative, qualitative data,
Speaker:you could say, hey, I used to get triggered with my partner
Speaker:about X. What's the frequency? Does it still happen at the same rate of
Speaker:frequency? Yes, no. And you can ask each other this. When I
Speaker:do get triggered, is it the same level of intensity? And the
Speaker:third one is, is, does it— am I in that trigger
Speaker:for hours, minutes, seconds, days? Like I used to be in
Speaker:it for days. Now I'm in it for hours. Okay. So you can
Speaker:use those three subjective criteria as a
Speaker:way to assess, am I— how am I learning within
Speaker:this journey? Of applying these kinds of techniques, if you will. You know, Jay,
Speaker:I'm curious, is there ever a shadow side to agreements, or
Speaker:does that even pertain to what we're talking about?
Speaker:Yeah, good question, Mike. So the shadow side
Speaker:of it is we've talked earlier today about functional and
Speaker:dysfunctional elements of codependency. So for me, the
Speaker:functional elements of agreements build dependency upon each other
Speaker:to live in a world and in our environment and execute and
Speaker:deal with life. The dysfunctional elements
Speaker:of codependency, as through the lens of agreements, could mean is that
Speaker:I've put my, my eggs
Speaker:in the basket of this agreement, meaning
Speaker:my own psychological peace, my
Speaker:happiness, are now externalized onto and projected
Speaker:onto these agreements. And then therefore my peace is only because we
Speaker:have agreements in place, not because I have peace
Speaker:within myself that these agreements are a reflection of that
Speaker:already existing inner peace that I have, so that
Speaker:if they become— if there's a
Speaker:partial violation or a full violation, I don't lose my
Speaker:serenity over it. It leads to a crucial conversation for sure, but I'm
Speaker:not going to lose my inner peace over that. So I think that
Speaker:is an element that people can watch out
Speaker:for with, with making these
Speaker:types of agreements. Um, yeah, and I— those are the important parts I
Speaker:would say for now that people watch
Speaker:out for with agreements. You know,
Speaker:lulling yourself into psychological safety just because you have
Speaker:an agreement. The other aspect, um, you know, when we
Speaker:think about agreements and the words that we're
Speaker:using I'm 54, Saina is 49. So I
Speaker:have 54 years of
Speaker:cumulative life experience that I project
Speaker:consciously and even unconsciously onto
Speaker:these agreements. We might be using the same word, we could say connection, as you
Speaker:use the word before connection. Well, what does that mean for you? Well,
Speaker:I have 54 years of a unique
Speaker:fingerprint that says connection is this. Zaina
Speaker:would say connection is this to me. So
Speaker:even within agreements, sometimes we got to get into the nitty-gritty of
Speaker:what do these terms mean for you and for me? Because if we
Speaker:just say, hey, we want to have an agreement that we want to
Speaker:always have connection, or whatever you fill in the blank,
Speaker:that's 54 years of
Speaker:loaded terminology, right? So it can be shallow in the sense
Speaker:of not digging deep enough to understand the
Speaker:totality of what I'm really meaning, thinking, and feeling and
Speaker:experiencing in my conditioning that is being imposed upon
Speaker:just one word. So that's just another thing to consider with
Speaker:agreements as well. Yeah, and the weight that we're putting
Speaker:on aspects of it and what we make it mean. Yeah, that's
Speaker:fascinating, bro. Yeah, this has been so helpful. I've really
Speaker:appreciated the depth the breadth and also the
Speaker:practicality of the tools, and also to assess and check in. The other thing
Speaker:that I really loved, just as a quick reflection, is
Speaker:how much you went into agreements. So last week, or well,
Speaker:now this week, but I released a whole show on
Speaker:covert contracts. So just unspoken agreements. So this is
Speaker:like such a beautiful— and then taking everything that
Speaker:you went into and we went into today, and anybody who listened to last week's
Speaker:episode, this will even— it was just take it to a whole new level. So
Speaker:I just really loved where we explored
Speaker:today. Um, as we wrap up, brother, what would you say, what would you love
Speaker:to, to leave people with? You know, I'm certainly going to leave in the, in
Speaker:the show notes the Inner Compass 9 assessment. I've talked about it many times
Speaker:in the show. It's step one for the work
Speaker:that I do. To understand and uncover and provide a language to a
Speaker:lot of these patterns. But to leave people today, is there anything you want
Speaker:to— like a take-home point or anything you want to reinforce as we
Speaker:wrap today, my man? You know, there's
Speaker:a— there's a quote that I really love. Feel free to
Speaker:adapt, adopt, or abandon this one, but
Speaker:it coincides with the conditioning and the persona and the masks
Speaker:that we wear. We've adopted that the inner
Speaker:compass and the Enneagram assessment helps us highlight those masks that we've been wearing
Speaker:and how we're compensating, right?
Speaker:But ultimately, the phrase goes like this:
Speaker:we cannot become that which we already
Speaker:are, and therefore we cannot be that
Speaker:which we're not. So if people can just consider that
Speaker:in light of our conversation and about the
Speaker:masks that I wear. Who
Speaker:am I? What am I? And that to
Speaker:me would be a question worth considering.
Speaker:I love it, man. Thank you so much. This has been super fun. Can't
Speaker:wait to have Uncle Jay back in town. Maybe
Speaker:there's another set of Matchbox Scars. But really, man,
Speaker:just love, love, love, love getting to have you here and also drop in with
Speaker:you. So appreciate you so much, man. Thank you again. Yeah, brother.
Speaker:Hugs and kisses. Uh, send my love to the family. I will. I will. Peace.