00:00:17.183 --> 00:00:21.683

Welcome to the Neurodiversity and Improv podcast from flatimprov.com.

00:00:22.823 --> 00:00:27.883

I'm Jen deHaan, and I suppose I am hosting this thing.

00:00:27.883 --> 00:00:35.903

And first of all, as a regular disclaimer, these podcasts aren't for telling anyone what to do.

00:00:35.903 --> 00:00:45.063

They are explanations to help encourage classes to be a little bit more inclusive, and teams to understand their teammates better.

00:00:45.203 --> 00:00:47.163

They're not excuses for anything.

00:00:47.163 --> 00:00:50.603

We're not making excuses for our behavior or what we do.

00:00:50.603 --> 00:00:54.363

And of course, these are not for diagnosis.

00:00:54.363 --> 00:01:01.163

We aren't using these episodes to diagnose ourselves or anyone else.

00:01:01.163 --> 00:01:03.123

And we're not talking about therapy or anything.

00:01:03.123 --> 00:01:09.043

This is just about how we think and do things in improv in a cognitive sense.

00:01:09.043 --> 00:01:17.583

So in the previous episode, I discussed what bottom up thinking is and what top down thinking is and how they work in improv.

00:01:17.583 --> 00:01:25.423

I encourage you to go back and listen to that episode because I give examples that will help it make sense.

00:01:25.423 --> 00:01:27.863

This is what each thing is.

00:01:27.863 --> 00:01:44.763

Bottom up thinking is where you are taking all of the details and all of those specifics, all of those little items, and you take them all together and then form your opinion after you have information gathered.

00:01:44.763 --> 00:01:56.923

So you are taking all those details from a scene and then wrapping them up into the gist afterwards, after you have all of your evidence and kind of processed it out.

00:01:56.923 --> 00:02:00.103

Top down thinking goes in the opposite direction.

00:02:00.103 --> 00:02:13.583

Top down thinkers will be using their history, all of their learned experience to sort of form a hypothesis or the gist at the forefront of their information gathering.

00:02:13.583 --> 00:02:20.803

So before they go ahead and go look at those details to support that gist or adjust it accordingly.

00:02:20.803 --> 00:02:23.903

So that's bottom up thinking and top down in a nutshell.

00:02:23.903 --> 00:02:30.603

And you can find examples of both of those things in the improv context in episode three.

00:02:30.603 --> 00:02:42.283

One thing I also talked about is how we can think top down when we need to and by we, I mean bottom up thinkers.

00:02:42.283 --> 00:02:48.923

It just takes more effort and more energy than someone who naturally thinks top down.

00:02:48.923 --> 00:03:00.883

And vice versa, of course, if you are a top down thinker and you need to start doing something bottom up, it will also be harder for you, but it's all still possible.

00:03:00.883 --> 00:03:07.703

And all of this is because these things are fundamentally how our brains are wired.

00:03:07.703 --> 00:03:10.563

It's not something we can change.

00:03:10.563 --> 00:03:15.503

It doesn't mean you, however, can't ever think in a certain way.

00:03:15.503 --> 00:03:19.323

It just might be a workaround or something that you learn.

00:03:19.323 --> 00:03:28.323

You might be doing a version that is not your first choice, and you might only notice, hey, this is just really hard for me.

00:03:29.063 --> 00:03:30.703

I can't do this very well.

00:03:30.703 --> 00:03:33.743

It comes so naturally for that person over there and not for me.

00:03:34.423 --> 00:03:40.543

Well, you might just be doing a different form of thinking than the way that your brain is naturally wired.

00:03:40.543 --> 00:04:01.283

For instance, I never even noticed that I was doing top down thinking in improv until I sat down between doing improv sets and stuff and actually started stepping through how I was cognitively doing something in improv and then noticed, oh, so that's what I'm doing.

00:04:01.283 --> 00:04:03.243

OK, and then that kind of helped me.

00:04:03.543 --> 00:04:08.683

So that's why I'm doing these podcasts, I guess.

00:04:08.683 --> 00:04:13.983

So I'm going to talk a little bit more about that in today's episode.

00:04:13.983 --> 00:04:25.663

This episode is what happens when bottom up thinkers do top down thinking, what that looks like or feels like and maybe kind of how it's done.

00:04:25.663 --> 00:04:33.543

I don't really know how it's done, but I figured out when I was doing it and what that kind of feels like in a way.

00:04:33.543 --> 00:04:42.923

But I'll do my disclaimer, if you've listened to this podcast, you know, I will say this is just me.

00:04:42.923 --> 00:04:52.163

It will work and feel different for you in some ways or maybe a lot of ways, even if you are also a bottom up thinker.

00:04:52.163 --> 00:05:06.783

these episodes are just to help you start the process of thinking about how you do things and noticing them might help you do or think about improv in new and hopefully useful ways.

00:05:06.783 --> 00:05:09.503

Top down, bottom up, neither of them are correct.

00:05:09.503 --> 00:05:13.223

It's just they're different and it's the way you are.

00:05:13.223 --> 00:05:17.903

And we can all do improv and we all bring something good to improv.

00:05:17.903 --> 00:05:21.883

And things are better when people are different, right?

00:05:21.883 --> 00:05:23.863

And one more final note.

00:05:24.103 --> 00:05:28.063

I don't want this to seem like I'm thinking about this during a scene.

00:05:28.063 --> 00:05:33.483

I'm absolutely not thinking about any of this during a scene.

00:05:33.483 --> 00:05:38.583

This is all of what I think in between scenes and between sets.

00:05:38.583 --> 00:05:51.423

It helps me somehow during a scene, however, even though I'm not thinking about any of this during a scene, I am not sure how it just seems to kind of get in there.

00:05:51.543 --> 00:05:55.523

I guess that's the magic and mystery of Improv.

00:05:55.523 --> 00:06:03.823

For the rest of it, I'll pick it all apart and overthink and overanalyze as Improv nerds tend to do.

00:06:03.823 --> 00:06:05.223

All right.

00:06:05.223 --> 00:06:10.883

So the first example we're going to discuss is game and second beats.

00:06:10.883 --> 00:06:28.163

Top-down processing is often what we're using to get to the kind of gist or that sort of nugget of what the game is or what is the thing in this scene we're going to take to the second beat, which is often the game, right?

00:06:28.163 --> 00:06:35.843

So in order to get to that, we need to think about all the details and kind of get to the gist, right?

00:06:35.843 --> 00:06:38.083

You're getting to that nugget.

00:06:38.083 --> 00:06:40.183

What was this scene actually about?

00:06:40.183 --> 00:06:45.163

And to do that, oftentimes you're distilling it down into a single sentence.

00:06:45.843 --> 00:06:51.203

Some improvisers might describe this as a what-if statement.

00:06:51.203 --> 00:06:57.323

What if the tree fell on the house and turned into raccoons?

00:06:57.323 --> 00:06:59.963

That is the worst example.

00:06:59.963 --> 00:07:01.983

That was also improvised.

00:07:01.983 --> 00:07:04.823

That was off the top of my head without thinking.

00:07:04.823 --> 00:07:06.383

Terrible, terrible example.

00:07:06.383 --> 00:07:12.143

But I think you probably, if you're listening to this podcast, you probably know what I mean.

00:07:12.143 --> 00:07:17.603

You're going to a second beat, you're kind of distilling it down to that single sentence of what the scene was about.

00:07:17.603 --> 00:07:18.983

That is top down.

00:07:18.983 --> 00:07:24.263

If you're starting at the top and you're just thinking about this whole scene is one great big block.

00:07:24.263 --> 00:07:28.503

What sentence describes this scene that is top down?

00:07:28.503 --> 00:07:32.243

And then you might go, okay, that sentence doesn't make sense.

00:07:32.243 --> 00:07:34.683

And then you start thinking about the details in the scene.

00:07:34.683 --> 00:07:36.283

That is top down thinking.

00:07:36.283 --> 00:07:39.343

If you're taking all the details in the scene, you're okay.

00:07:39.343 --> 00:07:42.063

We started off in a supermarket and then we did it down the aisle.

00:07:42.123 --> 00:07:48.383

And then a tree came through and then the raccoons jumped out and then the raccoon, okay, how do I get this whole scene into a sentence?

00:07:48.383 --> 00:07:50.803

That's bottom up processing.

00:07:50.803 --> 00:07:57.903

So to do this fast, you need to just kind of think about the whole scene as a great big blob.

00:07:57.903 --> 00:08:00.643

And then you're like, what just what happened in the scene?

00:08:00.643 --> 00:08:02.343

Just stop thinking about the details.

00:08:02.343 --> 00:08:03.883

What happened?

00:08:03.883 --> 00:08:05.903

And that's when you get to that sentence fast.

00:08:05.903 --> 00:08:07.203

That's top down.

00:08:07.203 --> 00:08:21.263

And if you've learnt to move from details to kind of blobbing the scene into one great big blob, what's just what I just need to think of a sentence for the scene, that's forcing yourself to do top down.

00:08:21.263 --> 00:08:24.783

I started as a details person.

00:08:24.783 --> 00:08:26.643

I started with scenes.

00:08:26.643 --> 00:08:27.983

I would think through the whole scene.

00:08:27.983 --> 00:08:33.303

I would think about all the things that happened in the scene and then try to form that sentence based on all the details.

00:08:33.303 --> 00:08:34.503

And that was too slow.

00:08:34.503 --> 00:08:39.223

We do these exercises where you're doing the second beat right after the first beat scene.

00:08:39.303 --> 00:08:40.463

Like back to back.

00:08:40.463 --> 00:08:48.263

And if you stand there and analyze a whole scene and all the details and try to come up with a sentence, too slow.

00:08:48.263 --> 00:08:51.563

And then if you're in an actual, say you're doing an actual herald, right?

00:08:51.883 --> 00:08:59.723

You have the time, you're gonna be on the back line thinking about your scene and not paying attention to the one that comes after you, right?

00:08:59.723 --> 00:09:01.703

So you kind of don't want to do that either.

00:09:01.703 --> 00:09:07.083

So to speed it up, you oftentimes will be forcing yourself to do top-down thinking.

00:09:08.383 --> 00:09:14.383

Now, for me, this was like a learned skill because it was hard, because I was so used to thinking about all the details.

00:09:14.383 --> 00:09:16.503

That's what comes to be naturally, right?

00:09:16.503 --> 00:09:23.603

So I had to force myself to sort of go against my bottom-up thinking in order to speed this up.

00:09:23.603 --> 00:09:26.503

And I sort of detailed it already earlier.

00:09:26.503 --> 00:09:29.423

I think of the scene kind of like a blob.

00:09:29.423 --> 00:09:34.903

I sort of try to blank all the details out and just go, just what happened?

00:09:34.903 --> 00:09:37.643

And then the sentence will sort of come to me.

00:09:37.643 --> 00:09:39.103

I always question myself.

00:09:39.103 --> 00:09:40.303

That's where I kind of go back.

00:09:40.303 --> 00:09:41.683

Okay, does this detail?

00:09:41.683 --> 00:09:45.003

Yeah, that detail fits, that detail fits, that detail fits.

00:09:45.003 --> 00:09:45.483

Fine.

00:09:45.483 --> 00:09:46.563

Okay.

00:09:46.563 --> 00:09:48.103

That's the right sentence.

00:09:48.103 --> 00:09:53.483

And you sort of are just letting go to kind of let that happen, I suppose.

00:09:54.643 --> 00:09:57.703

That's kind of what it feels like for me.

00:09:57.703 --> 00:10:04.943

And the same kind of with, you know, figuring out the game of the scene is largely the same thing.

00:10:04.943 --> 00:10:09.703

It's kind of a letting go and just trying to see the whole thing as a blob for me.

00:10:09.703 --> 00:10:12.583

This might look very different for you.

00:10:12.583 --> 00:10:19.903

But if you are doing the details first, and you think that you might want to speed it up, you don't have to.

00:10:19.903 --> 00:10:28.163

But if you do want to try, figure out some way, like what is the way that you sort of look at things holistically?

00:10:28.163 --> 00:10:29.523

What does that look like for you?

00:10:30.163 --> 00:10:32.563

And then you might figure out what that is.

00:10:32.563 --> 00:10:40.763

And I'll have another example of a bottom-up thinker forcing top-down on herself.

00:10:40.763 --> 00:10:43.863

I'll have another example of that in a second.

00:10:43.863 --> 00:10:46.523

Sort of a larger, longer example.

00:10:46.523 --> 00:11:02.363

But I just want to give just a quick sort of tangent on another way that I approach doing second beats quickly, because it's very different and it's not going to work for a lot of you, but I'll just give a little blip of this.

00:11:02.363 --> 00:11:05.883

And I know that it's going to come up in another episode in more detail.

00:11:05.883 --> 00:11:23.443

But the other way that I do it is using hyperfantasia or sort of a very highly visual way of thinking, because I'm a very visual person and I can really see things in a lot of detail visually.

00:11:23.443 --> 00:11:28.143

I utilize that for a second beat sometimes because I can do it quite quickly.

00:11:28.183 --> 00:11:31.243

Let's see if I set up the first beat the right way.

00:11:31.243 --> 00:11:33.403

So this is the way that I do it.

00:11:33.403 --> 00:11:42.363

And the first beat I try to remember, this was after I figured out that this was possible, try to first of all remember the initiation.

00:11:42.363 --> 00:11:44.303

That's very important for this one.

00:11:44.303 --> 00:11:45.763

What was the initiation like?

00:11:45.763 --> 00:11:50.763

It doesn't have to be exactly the same sentence, but the gist of the initiation.

00:11:50.763 --> 00:11:54.063

So you can start there very specifically.

00:11:54.843 --> 00:11:59.503

And I try to remember the look of where the scene started.

00:11:59.503 --> 00:12:01.183

And that is the hyperventasia.

00:12:01.183 --> 00:12:03.443

That is the visual look.

00:12:03.443 --> 00:12:05.963

Where was I standing and what did it look like?

00:12:05.963 --> 00:12:07.123

What was there?

00:12:07.123 --> 00:12:18.803

And so I try to do my part in setting up that base reality, a very highly visual base reality at the top of the scene.

00:12:18.803 --> 00:12:32.183

And that's just so you can return there in an analogous sense, because you're just going to be taking that initiation, that top of the scene, and directly plunking it visually in the analogous spot.

00:12:32.183 --> 00:12:37.463

What you do from that point is walk yourself visually through the scene again.

00:12:37.463 --> 00:12:44.683

And you will find that you will remember things because you set up this very highly visual first beat.

00:12:44.683 --> 00:12:48.183

You can walk through the scene visually in the second beat.

00:12:48.183 --> 00:12:50.743

And it's very, very fast to do.

00:12:50.743 --> 00:12:54.403

You're putting yourself in the beginning and then working out your analogous scene down the road.

00:12:54.403 --> 00:12:56.803

You're not thinking about any of it.

00:12:56.803 --> 00:13:04.483

But it also means that you can start your second beat within seconds of finishing your first one, because you don't have to think at all.

00:13:04.483 --> 00:13:07.423

You just need to put yourself in an analogous space.

00:13:07.423 --> 00:13:10.843

That's the only thinking that you have to do between your scenes.

00:13:10.843 --> 00:13:16.383

It works if you set up your first beat and it's pretty effective.

00:13:16.383 --> 00:13:22.023

So I also want to add kind of a footnote to that last section.

00:13:22.363 --> 00:13:29.743

And I think it sort of might help illustrate the differences between the different neurotypes.

00:13:29.743 --> 00:13:39.743

I know that it must sound completely wild to say something like, and then you just visually walk through the scene and just kind of do it again.

00:13:39.743 --> 00:13:43.123

This is something I ran across accidentally.

00:13:43.123 --> 00:13:45.863

It's not something I've learned or something I tried to learn.

00:13:46.443 --> 00:13:49.303

Something like hyperfantasia, again, is just like Neurodiversity.

00:13:49.303 --> 00:13:50.723

It's something that's wired in.

00:13:50.723 --> 00:13:58.823

It's just the way that your brain has spent, in my case, like 46 years, probably, processing things.

00:13:58.823 --> 00:14:04.543

The reason I'm bringing this up is because all of our brains are wired differently.

00:14:04.543 --> 00:14:07.763

Now, if I said that in a class, hey, this is just what you do.

00:14:07.763 --> 00:14:08.823

I never would, by the way.

00:14:09.663 --> 00:14:16.003

And then you just walk yourself visually through the scene, and it just kind of works.

00:14:16.003 --> 00:14:17.203

All of you would leave, right?

00:14:17.203 --> 00:14:21.443

Like, that would be an awful teacher thing to do, right?

00:14:21.443 --> 00:14:23.823

But maybe there's a better way of doing it.

00:14:23.823 --> 00:14:26.823

Maybe a teammate's way is a better way of doing it.

00:14:26.823 --> 00:14:34.103

Or maybe I can take their sort of idea or their way of doing it and kind of work it into mine a bit.

00:14:34.103 --> 00:14:42.843

You're like, okay, I can't really do it in that way, but how can I take that and adjust my way to be closer to that or work with that?

00:14:42.843 --> 00:14:50.643

Or have, this is the most common one, have the same result, but cognitively it's processing, it's coming from a different place.

00:14:50.643 --> 00:15:04.843

And I think that's sort of one of the things that we can hopefully take to our classes and teams and teammates and stuff is just that understanding that we all might be coming to the same result, but coming at it from different cognitive directions.

00:15:04.843 --> 00:15:06.603

And they're not really wrong.

00:15:07.103 --> 00:15:13.663

There's some ways that are might be more efficient, like I was just describing in this whole episode, top down versus bottom up.

00:15:13.663 --> 00:15:18.523

It's when us bottom uppers are doing top down because it's more efficient.

00:15:18.523 --> 00:15:22.723

And there might be a lot of questions for a student to get there.

00:15:22.723 --> 00:15:31.463

And I think that is really key for all of us to remember, because someone else at the same time might be using colors to remember certain things.

00:15:31.463 --> 00:15:39.863

They might leave color tags on something or someone who doesn't see visual, has their own way of thinking and remembering and stepping through a scene.

00:15:39.863 --> 00:15:46.523

That for me would be the same reaction as they would have to me just visually walking through a scene.

00:15:46.523 --> 00:15:50.343

It might be numbers or it might be a very linear or some other way.

00:15:50.343 --> 00:15:51.203

I can't even fathom.

00:15:51.203 --> 00:15:53.163

I don't know what that is, right?

00:15:53.163 --> 00:15:54.843

And that's sort of the point.

00:15:54.843 --> 00:16:00.263

I know for you, the way that I do it, you might go, a hat just sounds wild and I don't know.

00:16:00.263 --> 00:16:08.163

But you have another way of doing it that's perfectly valid, smart, efficient for you and should be honoured.

00:16:08.163 --> 00:16:14.203

And I think the more that we start all learning the different ways that we're doing things, I mean, that's just fascinating, isn't it?

00:16:14.203 --> 00:16:17.583

The next example that I promised earlier.

00:16:17.583 --> 00:16:20.943

So the example for that one is the Rat Report.

00:16:21.063 --> 00:16:29.803

So about a year ago, I was doing a new format for this post-Improv show I was not in.

00:16:29.803 --> 00:16:33.183

And I was making videos about that show.

00:16:33.183 --> 00:16:41.023

I didn't want to make videos that were reviewing improv or reviewing the show because that would be lame and who would want to watch that?

00:16:41.023 --> 00:16:41.643

Nobody.

00:16:41.643 --> 00:16:49.163

So I instead did a show that talked about the show without talking about the show.

00:16:49.523 --> 00:16:52.023

That was my, sort of what I wanted to do.

00:16:52.023 --> 00:16:54.743

And then I figured out how to do that.

00:16:55.043 --> 00:16:56.843

I had kind of no idea.

00:16:56.843 --> 00:17:08.823

But I thought, what if I make a show that finds connections across the whole show and fabricates sort of a theme or premise for that show?

00:17:08.823 --> 00:17:10.603

So that's what I tried to do.

00:17:10.603 --> 00:17:17.043

Now, the first time that I did this new format, I took a whole bunch of notes through the whole show that I watched.

00:17:17.283 --> 00:17:19.563

And this is the Rat Scrap Show out of New York.

00:17:19.563 --> 00:17:25.423

I took notes for the whole show in my level of detail, which is way too much detail.

00:17:25.423 --> 00:17:28.623

I take notes that's almost like a transcript.

00:17:28.623 --> 00:17:31.503

That's how I've always done it since school.

00:17:31.503 --> 00:17:33.363

You know, you get writer's bumps on your hand.

00:17:33.363 --> 00:17:36.203

Well, probably a lot of you don't because everybody types now.

00:17:36.203 --> 00:17:41.003

But back in the day, when we didn't have computers, I wrote notes like verbatim.

00:17:41.003 --> 00:17:44.383

And then I started typing notes like verbatim.

00:17:44.383 --> 00:17:45.223

That's what I did.

00:17:45.523 --> 00:17:50.363

So I was collecting all of the details from the Ratscrap show.

00:17:50.363 --> 00:17:52.263

And I had so many.

00:17:52.263 --> 00:17:57.363

So at the end, I then thought, well, here's almost a transcript of the whole show.

00:17:57.363 --> 00:18:00.643

Now make your connections between all the scenes.

00:18:00.643 --> 00:18:12.203

Make your connections so you can make up your fabricated premise, just theme of the show to prove to the people watching my two and a half minute video.

00:18:12.403 --> 00:18:15.563

And I had a very set time constraint too.

00:18:15.563 --> 00:18:16.783

It couldn't be too long.

00:18:16.783 --> 00:18:18.523

That was way too hard.

00:18:18.523 --> 00:18:20.763

And that was also the wrong way of doing it.

00:18:20.763 --> 00:18:22.523

That was bottom up thinking.

00:18:22.523 --> 00:18:24.503

I was doing all the details.

00:18:24.503 --> 00:18:32.503

I was trying to think and sort through all those details to come up with basically a one sentence.

00:18:32.503 --> 00:18:36.023

This is what the show was actually about.

00:18:36.023 --> 00:18:37.023

Did not work.

00:18:37.023 --> 00:18:40.663

I managed to make it happen for that first episode.

00:18:41.003 --> 00:18:44.383

And I realized I kind of had to lighten up my brain.

00:18:44.383 --> 00:18:46.083

I was like, I have too many notes.

00:18:46.083 --> 00:18:48.103

I have too many details.

00:18:48.103 --> 00:18:51.343

So for the following week, next week, I tried again.

00:18:51.343 --> 00:18:52.123

I was like, you know what?

00:18:52.123 --> 00:18:55.503

I'm going to force myself not to take too many notes.

00:18:55.503 --> 00:18:59.423

I'm just going to try to do like a sentence for each scene.

00:18:59.423 --> 00:19:11.263

And if I can think of a sentence to sort of tie up a tag run or whatever, one sentence, so I was consciously limiting myself to not take too many notes this time.

00:19:11.263 --> 00:19:18.583

And then, you know, still after the show is over, you know, I'm stressed out because I have a personally set time limit.

00:19:18.583 --> 00:19:21.163

I have to get this video at the same night.

00:19:21.163 --> 00:19:23.443

And I was like, how on earth am I going to do this?

00:19:23.443 --> 00:19:27.603

And I found myself just staring at the wall.

00:19:27.603 --> 00:19:29.763

I was like, I'm not even going to look at my notes.

00:19:29.763 --> 00:19:39.183

I'm just going to think about the show and it's going to think about like what pops out in the show, what is an overarching theme that brings everything together?

00:19:39.183 --> 00:19:42.103

And I just stared at the wall until it popped out at me.

00:19:42.103 --> 00:19:44.183

And and it did.

00:19:44.183 --> 00:19:48.243

I didn't think about any of the details or anything specific.

00:19:48.243 --> 00:19:52.823

I just tried to stop thinking almost and let it come to me.

00:19:52.823 --> 00:19:53.563

And it worked.

00:19:53.563 --> 00:19:58.623

And so I kept trying that each week and the following week after that, I was like, you know what?

00:19:58.623 --> 00:20:04.023

I'm just going to try lying on the floor and looking up at the ceiling because I can't even see my computer screen.

00:20:04.023 --> 00:20:09.403

I'm not even going to be thinking about looking at my notes file if I just lie on the floor.

00:20:09.403 --> 00:20:28.183

That is top-down thinking, I think, or it's my version of doing so because I had to get rid of all the details in order to make a universal fake connection between every scene of a show and a whole bunch of scenes that don't connect naturally because they weren't meant to.

00:20:29.083 --> 00:20:43.403

So that was the process for doing The Rat Report and I'm sure now, or I'm pretty sure that's my version of doing top-down thinking as a lifelong wired-in bottom-up thinker.

00:20:43.403 --> 00:20:52.143

So now I'm coming to the part of the podcast that tries to let you know how on earth any of this is useful.

00:20:52.143 --> 00:20:53.183

Maybe it's not.

00:20:53.183 --> 00:21:03.743

I might just be blabbing into a microphone at my wall saying a whole bunch of useless whatevers of how I do things that really apply to nobody else or make no sense.

00:21:03.743 --> 00:21:15.863

So I've found figuring out how you do something cognitively somehow helps you do improv in the moment, even if you're not thinking about any of this.

00:21:15.863 --> 00:21:24.783

Of course, with doing a second beat or finding game, it's a lot more obvious how it's useful to change the way that you think about something.

00:21:25.303 --> 00:21:29.803

Perhaps, you know, you have to get to that high level gist.

00:21:29.803 --> 00:21:43.103

So even if you do bottom up thinking still, you know that, hey, maybe I need to narrow it down a bit and think about fewer details, for example, to get to that gist a little bit faster, or you might completely change how you're thinking.

00:21:43.103 --> 00:21:48.403

Like I detailed that sort of blob of a scene that I try to stick a label on.

00:21:48.403 --> 00:21:51.923

But knowing this, knowing any of this helps you out.

00:21:52.343 --> 00:21:55.983

And of course, that's the whole premise of learning, right?

00:21:55.983 --> 00:22:02.403

And learning and growth, and you throw away the things that don't work, and you keep the things that do.

00:22:02.403 --> 00:22:10.983

But with that hyperphantasia example, which isn't bottom-up or top-down thinking at all, that's just sort of a supplemental thing.

00:22:10.983 --> 00:22:28.463

But in that case, after I came to that realization of, oh, hey, this is one way I can do a scene, I did know that the base reality and remembering a pretty solid gist of what the actual initiation was specifically would really help in that case.

00:22:28.463 --> 00:22:33.723

So that was one where it really influenced how I did a first beat.

00:22:33.723 --> 00:22:40.423

I was like, hey, if I want this as an option, I need a really strong visual off the top.

00:22:40.423 --> 00:22:51.323

And I also knew, hey, if I didn't have that, I could throw away attempting to even do a second beat using that technique because I know it just wouldn't work that well if I did try it.

00:22:51.323 --> 00:23:01.023

So that's where analyzing how you think and process a scene cognitively can help you out in improv.

00:23:01.023 --> 00:23:07.983

And I don't think thinking about these things, thinking about thinking takes the fun out of improv.

00:23:07.983 --> 00:23:16.643

Even if you are analyzing things in great detail between scenes, you don't do any of this analysis while you're doing a scene.

00:23:17.183 --> 00:23:25.223

And having these tools kind of, they're just floating around, and your brain kind of picks up and does them.

00:23:25.223 --> 00:23:32.203

So really being a real hyper analytical robot makes you more fun in the end.

00:23:32.203 --> 00:23:34.403

Hi, I'm Jen.

00:23:34.403 --> 00:23:35.803

I go on tangents.

00:23:35.803 --> 00:23:38.303

And I'm a chronic middle-aged info dumper.

00:23:38.303 --> 00:23:39.563

And I commit to it.

00:23:39.563 --> 00:23:43.203

I commit to it hard, almost as hard as I commit to a bit.

00:23:43.603 --> 00:23:51.743

Okay, we've gotten to the end of episode four on top down thinking for bottom uppers.

00:23:51.743 --> 00:23:54.043

I think that's might be what I call it.

00:23:54.043 --> 00:23:58.303

I have improv stuff in places.

00:23:58.303 --> 00:23:59.943

I have flatimprov.com.

00:23:59.943 --> 00:24:03.743

I do a newsletter that is dedicated to online improv.

00:24:03.743 --> 00:24:09.203

So that's everything from live streams and podcasts to classes and jams.

00:24:09.203 --> 00:24:13.443

Speaking of classes and jams, I have some of those at World's greatest Improv School.

00:24:13.443 --> 00:24:14.723

That's wgimprovschool.com.

00:24:16.003 --> 00:24:17.403

The school has a whole lot of stuff.

00:24:17.403 --> 00:24:20.363

So go check that website out.

00:24:20.363 --> 00:24:29.763

And also I want to note that on flatimprov.com, the other website, you can also submit your classes, jams, etc.

00:24:29.763 --> 00:24:34.823

to that site, and they will get listed in the newsletter that I do put out.

00:24:34.823 --> 00:24:40.203

So go to flatimprov.com/submit to add your things.

00:24:40.403 --> 00:24:44.203

And if you want to add something to this podcast, flatimprov.com/substack.

00:24:46.623 --> 00:24:48.743

It has a contact form.

00:24:48.743 --> 00:24:57.663

It has a thing that you can use to upload a voice note, an audio file that I would play on this podcast.

00:24:57.663 --> 00:25:01.583

So if you have something to add, you can send it to me and I'll put it in here.

00:25:01.583 --> 00:25:14.223

And if you want text words, if you want to submit those instead for me to read it out, I'll do that too, because I don't want this podcast to only be what Jen thinks and how Jen thinks and all that sort of thing.

00:25:14.223 --> 00:25:15.863

That's only one person.

00:25:15.863 --> 00:25:21.283

And I'd rather have your voices and experiences here as well.

00:25:21.283 --> 00:25:23.543

So please consider doing that.

00:25:23.563 --> 00:25:25.523

And I'll see you next time.

00:25:25.523 --> 00:25:26.443

Thanks for listening.