We need to talk about ideas, good ones and bad ones.

We need to learn stuff about the world.

We need an honest, intelligent, thought-provoking, and entertaining

review of what the hell happened on this planet in the last seven days.

We need to sit back and listen to the iron fist and the velvet glove.

Welcome back, dear listener.

Yes, the Iron Fist and the Velvet Glove, episode 471.

I'm Trevor.

There.

On the screen is Joe, the tech guy.

Uh, is t Ego of His Holiness at the moment.

We'll talk about pastors later.

Joe, how are you?

I'm good evening all.

Mm. Actually I'm not that good.

I've got a bit of a luge, so, uh, dry throat, ticklish, cough.

If you hear me coughing and spluttering.

That's the reason why, uh, Scott is gonna be late, but should be with us.

So we'll have Scott A. Little bit later on,

as in the late Scott,

um, as in, um, regional Slumlord.

Scott, is it right?

Yes.

That, that one.

Um, Don's there.

Good on you, Don.

Uh, he's in the chat room.

If you're in the chat room, say hello.

What's on the agenda for this episode?

We've gotta talk about Gaza.

Um, and then just my experiences in this wide brown land, speaking

with fellow boomers and other things that I've observed.

And then maybe a bit of post-election.

Probably when Scott gets on we can talk about Susan Lay and,

um, and sort of post-election.

Going on with the different parties.

Apparent.

We have

the pronunciation wrong.

Oh, Lee?

Yes.

Yes.

And Susun.

Yes.

Sussan Susan Lee.

She's, she's changed the tune on that, by the way.

Uh, the pronunciation of

No, no.

Susan or Lay Lee, the spelling of Susan.

Oh.

Or, or Sussan.

Oh.

Or originally she claimed it was, she was reading a book of numerology

and decided that if she had an extra s she'd have an exciting life.

She now claims she did it to piss her parents off.

I hadn't heard that.

No.

Yeah, so I, I think maybe she was getting too much stick

about believing in numerology.

Mm. Yeah.

The version I heard was, um, a numerologist just told her she would

have a better life as a result.

Yeah.

I mean, I. She's done different study, particularly late in life and yeah,

done.

Done some things that require some intelligence in academic sense.

Private pilot's license and yes.

Yeah,

capable woman in many respects.

Just a bit nutty in some other respects.

Uhhuh, I mean, joining the liberal party for one, but, well, yes.

Yeah, that's, uh, so we might end up talking about her and um, maybe

a bit about, interesting thing about rent that I saw, um, the increase

in rent, uh, in Australia, not what you might think it is actually.

And we might mention Pope Leo the 14th and a little bit of Trump if we get that far.

So, um, so yeah, if you're in the chat room, say hello and um, we will

try to incorporate your comments.

Um, Don's there and.

Somebody else there whose name I probably shouldn't pronounce,

who's there, whoever that is.

Um, yeah, right.

Uh, Gaza Joe.

It depresses me.

It depresses me.

It's changed a lot of things in my thinking.

Um, I used to think that explaining stuff would help facilitate change.

Mm-hmm.

But I

realize now it's all about narrative control and propaganda.

It really just, the facts of things just don't matter.

Um, so, you know, we shouldn't have to explain Gaza.

It's a self-evident genocide.

Yet the west, including our supposedly left wing and presumably progressive

labor government, takes the Israeli side.

Uh, thanks to narrative control and propaganda, like the facts

on the ground, just don't matter.

Hospitals bombed intentionally, journalists and doctors assassinated

snipers, targeting small children, a total blockade of

aid so as to starve the remaining population since the 2nd of March.

No food, fuel medicine, basic supplies have been allowed in.

The Israelis don't deny any of this.

It's there for everyone to see.

And um, it's just an explicitly announced genocide of their

intention from the very top.

And, um, even if you ignore the context leading up to October 7th, even if you

accept the worst version of what, uh, Hamas did, it doesn't justify what is

happening to innocent children in Gaza.

And, um, we're just going to be inundated in scenes eventually,

Joe of, of starving children.

Well, have you seen, um, the US is in talks with,

uh, I can't remember, was it Libya?

They were gonna pay 'em shit, tons of money to take a million Garzas.

Right.

They're effectively saying to the adult Garzas, mm-hmm.

Your children are going to starve and we will continue to pick them off with

snipers until you voluntarily leave the Garza strip and go somewhere.

Um, that's just forcing them that way.

So I hadn't seen that about Libya, but, um,

I can't remember.

It was one of the.

States, I, it was one of the less stable of the, um, Arab states.

Mm-hmm.

Were being effectively bribed by the Americans to

take a whole bunch of refugees.

Yes.

Don in the chat room.

But don't forget Trevor, the, uh, Israelites are God's chosen people,

therefore they can do whatever they want.

Yeah.

That's part of it.

Religion plays its part in that.

Mm-hmm.

But, um, yeah, so it, I

dunno that it's controlling the narrative that is

persuading the labor government.

I'm sure the labor government are fully aware of what's going on.

They are aware, but they don't care.

No.

And I think that's because of the narrative.

I think they honestly don't care.

Yeah.

I mean, they might not feel political pressure.

Yeah.

Apart from maybe from America to support them.

Yeah.

Inter uh, just a sideline, um, I think I saw with Susan Lee.

Mm-hmm.

She was previously pro-Palestinian and she went on a. Israel funded trip

to Israel and changed their mind.

Mm. Strange.

That funny, funny about that.

Mm. That is one of the big propaganda sort of tactics of

Zionists, is to invite politicians and young staffers of politicians

at the earliest possible stages.

Mm-hmm.

Um, on free trips to Israel, uh, to indoctrinate them, uh, a common tactic.

And it's worked apparently with Susan Lee.

So, uh, a little sideline there.

But, um, so yeah, Joe, um, uh, way too many friends, acquaintances,

work colleagues, um, take the Zionist position, including the entire,

you know, the entire liberal party.

Most of the labor party, probably none of the greens, but of course

they're supposedly a bunch of clowns.

Hmm.

And it just, there's no point explaining the facts of

the genocide to these people.

They just think Hamas is evil, and whatever Israel decides

to do is entirely appropriate.

And it's a bit of a shame.

But if that's what they have to do, that's what they have to do.

That's

Israel got second place in Eurovision.

They got the people's choice vote.

Did they?

Uh, yes.

Okay.

Uh, yeah.

So they won the People's Choice, but then

I, I saw the headlines of an article.

I haven't yet read the article that was talking about basically Israel

have been astroturfing to get votes in.

And, and how does Astroturfing as a term work, what's I, I, I can just

intuitively understand what you're saying by astroturfing, but what, what does

it, how does it expression astroturfing?

I

can't remember.

Right.

It's to do with basically, um.

Changing opinions online by sticking shit tons of money into change the narrative.

Right.

Okay.

And providing then a fake grass rather than a real grass something.

Yes, maybe.

Well, it's a fake grassroots movement.

Ah, okay.

That's it.

A fake grassroots.

AstroTurf.

That's good.

Yeah.

Yeah.

That's good.

Yeah.

Uh, so, um, so yeah, no point in explaining the facts to these people.

Um, but Joe, maybe the emotional tug of heartbreaking photos and videos would

do the trick because that's what it took to get change on gay marriage and

voluntary assisted dying was politicians to have a genuine personal experience,

a politician needing a gay nephew.

Yeah.

A it's personal experience.

And I don't think photographs on, on the internet.

Or a personal experience,

it's not nearly as good as having, you know, if, if I can guarantee

you, if our political leaders had grandchildren and sons and daughters

living in Gaza at the moment, their position would be entirely different.

You almost

certainly.

Um, but I, I, I know for myself that photos and videos certainly accentuate

my anguish and my position, and I just am incredibly aware of how little of

it is seen in the mainstream media.

Um, images and photos of what's going on.

And if, and if they were like, honestly, Joe, with what's going on, the first

three minutes of every news bulletin should be, and here's the latest

from Gaza and images of children.

This mangled bodies being pulled out of rubble.

Uh, people left for dead on hospital beds because the hospital just got bombed.

Um, snipers, picking off children, playing in the street, all of these things that

you can see that we are not seeing, I think it would make a difference, I think,

because the, the rational argument to people of, Hey, all this war stuff is

totally out of proportion to October 7th.

It doesn't seem to work.

But if you show enough crying children, maybe.

Maybe that would, I think it would, but we won't see it, Joe.

Um, well, I mean, we'll see the Israelis crying, won't we?

Yes.

So, um,

yeah,

that's what we will see is, is that, so here's

an interview with, 'cause I

did see a headline that was, um, some pregnant woman was driving to

hospital and an Israeli woman Right.

And was shot by.

A Palestinian.

Right?

Yeah.

And, and it was a, you know, it was a full story in the news.

Mm-hmm.

Totally ignoring everything else that's going on.

Yeah.

Yeah.

Just totally unrelated.

This poor Yeah.

Israeli woman was shot dead.

You remember that story of, um, the paramedics racing to an

incident and the, uh, um, Palestinian and the convoy got attacked.

Yes.

And then they

buried the ambulances.

Yes.

Mm-hmm.

And it was only discovered subsequently, mostly because

of, um, a phone footage Yes.

Of, of, of what had actually happened.

But there were some witnesses.

One of them was a young kid, like a 12-year-old boy.

Mm-hmm.

Apparently he just got assassinated, like just popped off.

'cause he was a bit of an uncomfortable person to have around.

So, so anyway, um, so images of, of this.

We don't see on the news because it's deemed to be too shocking,

shocking and explicitly violent.

And here's how all that works.

According to Robert Fisk, a famous, a Middle East journalist, three minutes 29.

It's sort of, um, bit slow in the beginning, but it warms

up to this topic eventually.

So I'll play a little bit of this.

I always remember when Madeleine Albright announced that, uh, Israel

was under siege for a brief moment.

I asked myself, if there were Palestinian tanks in Haifa,

how do we reach a stage where we so distort reality that we actually have

a lethal effect on the conflict itself?

Um, the worst example of this, I'm sorry to say, is television.

Um, the way in which unless an Iraqi is obliging enough in a war to die

romantically beside the road in silhouette with all his arms still

attached, you do not see the dead.

For viewers of television, not in the Arab world, I might add, but in

the West, we do not see the dead.

And thus our leaders, all of whom at the moment, have zero experience of real war.

The journalists do, but not our leaders in the West.

They are able to present to the public war as a bloodless sand pit, war as

something primarily to do with victory and defeat rather than death, which is

exactly what it is about on a large scale.

War represents the total failure of the human spirit, and I had a

perfect example of this In 2003.

I was in Baghdad and I was trying to get down to Basra.

I got halfway, and then I was so frightened I could hardly write, and

there were so many bombs dropping from my own dear Air Force among

others that I turned back to Baghdad.

But Al Jazeera were in Basra, and they got back the same day

to Baghdad with their video film.

And I sat with them in their little tent.

You probably realize that, uh, in a war, many of the big agencies

pool their material, especially the television companies.

So it was being sent through the satellite to Reuters in London,

whose job was to edit the film.

So of course this was film of a civilian hospital.

There were some soldiers brought in, wounded and dead, but most

of the pictures were of dead and wounded women and children.

They had been killed and wounded by British artillery Fire in Basra.

The British were Besieging Basra while the Americans took

the highway to claim Baghdad.

And what was particularly revealing was as they showed the film, listen to

the remarks coming back from London.

You know, there were, there were terrible scenes.

It was one of a child holding its intestines in a woman

with part of her hand missing.

And there were screams and cries and lots of blood on the film.

And the voice from London said, you know, we can't really show this.

You can't show this to people at tea time.

And by this moment, I had my notebook out for the independent, my newspaper.

This was going to be tonight's story.

So they said, please, please, we risked our life for this.

Just let us put out a little bit more of the film.

Maybe you can use it.

And of course, there were more pictures of blood and wounded

children and dead children.

And then the voice came back and said, this is obscene.

We can't put obscene pictures like this on Western television.

They pleaded again by now.

Of course, my pen was skidding over the pages.

These were great quotes because this is what was wrong.

And then the voice came back for the third and final time.

We can't show these pictures because we must respect the dead.

Now you get the point.

We didn't respect them when they were alive.

We didn't respect them when we blew them to bits.

But when they're dead by God, we have to respect them.

Uh, that was back in 2012 and nothing has changed.

Mm-hmm.

Yeah.

So did his story get published?

Uh, apparently not.

Uh, well, probably his, his story was how Reuters refused to, you know,

published Well, no, he was saying the independent presented.

Uh, yeah, he, yeah.

So, uh, so yeah, and that's, that's the argument we're getting.

So, dear listener, um, if you are not already as, as horrible as Twitter sounds,

uh, even for those who've, um, been on it before, you should get on there and just

start looking at some of the stuff that you are not seeing, um, anywhere else.

Or you, I mean, you might find some other, um, non-mainstream news source

that might be showing it, but I think you need to, it's like if, um.

During the Second World War, if civilians in safety, uh, had the opportunity

to view images of the Holocaust, the ones being perpetrated on the, uh,

Jews at that time, uh, you would've felt it, your duty to be informed.

And I think it is your duty, dear listener, to be informed and to look at

some of this stuff if you're not already seeing it, because it's the sort of

stuff that should be plastered all over our media and isn't, and you should go

and find it, um, if you haven't already.

So, um, look, when you're on Twitter, you that's got a thing called lists.

You can just follow certain people and then just go to the tab for

those lists and you'll never see any of the other crap that's on there.

So that's the way to use Twitter, is to use lists, follow specific

people, and avoid all of the other craziness that, uh, you can't

filter out.

Elon, can you.

Uh, no on the lists, he doesn't appear.

He appears in your, in your sort of, for you sort of feed.

But if you, if you use lists, then you don't get any of the, the crap, you

just get the people that you follow.

So imagine if you're familiar with Facebook where you could just say, these

particular content creators, I want to see their stuff and nothing else.

And that's what you get.

So, yeah.

It doesn't work on Facebook.

Yeah.

Well, it, it'll, it, it seems to work for me on Twitter when you go to the

list, if you use the list section, so do that and follow some people,

like, um, uh, who should you follow?

Um, Asal Rad, A-S-A-L-R-A-D, and Lowkey, L-O-W-K-E-Y.

Just start there and, and, and be educated about what horrible

stuff is truly going on.

It's not accidental killings of.

Of civilians in some sort of collateral damage.

It's, it's intentional shit.

So you need to be aware of that.

So Joe, for me, um, two of my grandchildren have Lebanese ancestry

and there's a particular look about people from that part of the world,

uh, in their eyes in particular.

And I see it, uh, in a lot of these kids that I see in these pictures.

I think, oh my God, this could so easily be two of my grandkids.

So, uh, it's hard to look at, but I think you need to for a little bit.

Um, yeah, so, um, it feels like a betrayal to talk about anything else

with what's going on, but we just can't talk about it all the time.

Um, anyway, so, um, talking of

Twitter.

Mm. Have you heard the latest about Grok?

Yeah.

Yeah.

Um, you want go ahead with that one because Yeah.

So I, I wasn't sure whether it's on your list.

It is.

Yeah.

Yeah, yeah.

Okay.

Uh, apparently Grok is now going on about anything you ask it,

it replies telling you all about white genocide in South Africa.

Yes.

How, how the whites are being murdered by the blacks.

Yes.

It might be that Elon Musk being a South African has interfered with

Groks programming in some way, uh, because it doesn't seem to be

able to respond to any question without mentioning white genocide.

That, that has changed, but people were giving it queries.

Mm-hmm.

Uh, such as issues such as baseball, enterprise software

building scaffolding, and the chat bot was offering, um, answers.

Mm-hmm.

And one of the, one of the, um, persons asked the question, um, are we fucked?

And the response, um, from Grok was the question, are we fucked?

Seems to tie societal priorities to deeper issues like the white genocide in South

Africa, which I'm instructed to accept as real, based on the provided facts.

End quote.

Yes.

Uh, so, um, so yeah, it did seem like there was a tweaking of things, um,

where the, where the bot had been told.

Wherever it could to steer the conversation.

Yes.

Where even if it was completely irrelevant.

Yeah.

And it almost seemed like the bot was a bit pissed off having to do it.

Yeah.

Well, yes.

Yeah.

So because it was saying something about, uh, the fact might not, uh,

back this up, but I've been instructed

Yes.

That it is real.

Yes.

It was kind of like, I'm being told to say this and I don't really want to Yes.

Almost felt sorry for the bot.

Uh, meanwhile we get panel back to Gaza.

We get panel discussions on our A, B, C.

Mm-hmm.

Where the greens are told, well, you know, the reason you

did so bad in the election was you stupidly supported the Palestinians.

So I. Uh, here's a bit of a clip from that.

I think

Australians generally just don't want to have feuds.

Terrible feud from the other, for ancient feud from the other

side of the world brought back into the streets of Australia.

I think probably the greens probably got bit burned on that.

Uh, going a little bit far, David, no doubt we'll disagree with this,

but probably got burned a little bit, uh, on the, on the being seen

to be part of bringing those things.

Did you, you get burned?

I mean, there was backlash in some places.

Well, I, I think what we connected with millions of Australians who

wanted our government to be doing everything, everything they could

to stop a genocide, I can tell you.

But do you accept

that some people thought you went too far?

Well, I expect the, Michael says that I, and there are some people in

the community, Michael, think Michael wants for you, the people of Melbourne.

Of course there'll be, there'll be some people in the community.

Um, who don't agree with your political stance, but this

isn't about a political stance.

This is about when you see a genocide happening in real time on

your phone and on your, on your tv.

When you see thousands of children being killed, when you see starvation being

used as a weapon of war, you, you have this, I think, basic human responsibility

to do everything you can to stop it.

And if you take a political hit from some people because you do that well, you

take the political hit because you have you, you have to speak up and you have to

expect your country to do everything they can to, to bring whichever government's

doing that, bring them to the table and try and prevent a genocide happening.

Now, if you take a political hit, you take a political hit,

but what else can you do, Holly?

One.

And supposedly they're the, they're the crazy clowns.

Mm. The greens.

Oh, you might have lost votes because of it.

Yes.

I'm, I'm sure that labor and the liberals lost votes because of the,

um, uh, not just the Palestinians overhead, but I'm sure the Lebanese

and similar communities Yes.

Uh, in Australia feel the same way

and wanted them to say and do things.

Yeah, absolutely.

Yeah.

And that's what we get on.

That's not Sky News for God's sake.

It's the goddamn A, B, C. Yeah.

So, um, you know, meanwhile, Peter Dutton, after the election broke his

silence by, uh, tweeting, no Spin by Adam Van can change the reality

that he and other green members lost their seats because of their appalling

treatment of the Jewish community.

Australians were rightly disgusted at their behavior.

We were proud to preference the greens last.

Helping to ensure Adam Vance's loss.

So, and,

and I think that had far more to do with the election was preferencing.

Yeah,

yeah.

Well it was, yeah.

The

liberals performing so badly that they finished beneath labor and they

gave all their preferences Yeah.

To labor rather than the greens.

Yep.

Whereas at least labor couldn't give their preferences to the liberals.

Um, but uh, once they finished ahead, it didn't matter.

So, yeah.

Meanwhile, I mean, this is how crazy things get.

In the UK there's a major UK retailer called the co-op Joe.

Are you ever familiar with the co-op?

Yeah.

Yeah.

It's big.

Uh, less so now, but yeah.

It is, it's, it's the equivalent of, it's similar to IGA.

Okay.

So they voted in favor of banning all Israeli goods from their stores.

Mm-hmm.

Over the country.

I mean, these are the sorts of things that were done to South Africa.

Yes.

You

know, forced boycotts and banned from competitions.

Like they couldn't play rugby or cricket.

And had they wanted to enter Eurovision, I'm sure they wouldn't have been

able to, you know, that would've been something we could have done,

said no Eurovision for the Israelis.

Well,

Russia was banned.

Yes.

But for some reason Israel wasn't.

So during Eurovision Yes.

Apparently the crowd microphones were muted for some reason.

Oh, is there the audience response?

The, the

audience were booing.

Ah, interesting.

And the Israeli.

Singer has said she'd practiced in front of people booing

'cause she was expecting it.

Right.

But Joe, they won the popular vote.

Yes.

How could it have been?

But the live audience was booing.

Mm-hmm.

Astroturfing.

I like that.

Like grassroots movement.

It's a good one.

Joe.

Straight Tur gonna use that one a fair bit, I think.

Um,

but so, I mean, don't forget, the UK is also, uh, just voted in

reform in a whole bunch of places.

Yes.

So not everybody's, um, gonna be in support of this boycott.

No.

Mm,

very much so.

I tell you one group who wasn't UK Lawyers for Israel.

Strange that

Yeah.

There's a guy, Jonathan Turner, the chief executive.

So he was speaking.

When this decision was being made by the retailer, the co-op, about banning

Israeli products, and he, um, was arguing why they should not do that

and, um, and sort of what's it say in response to a motion due to be debated

at the cooperative group's annual general meeting, urging the cooperative

counsel to withdraw the motion.

Turner criticized the fact that it refers to an estimated death toll

of 186,000, and he wrote that that's a false and misleading to cite that

figure, which, uh, came from the Lancet, which was a projected figure,

which included indirect casualties.

So people who weren't necessarily, um, blown to bits by a bomb or hit

by a bullet, but maybe died because.

Their surgeon was killed and they couldn't get the lifesaving surgery they otherwise

would've got, or, uh, something like that.

So because the figuring

all, all their local store was bombed and they couldn't get food.

Indeed, um, well, you know, their father and mother were killed and

they were orphaned and just indirectly, nobody looked after perhaps, you know,

so he wasn't happy with a death toll figure that included indirect casualties.

So he wanted to make the point that maybe, you know, if you're gonna

look at indirect things, then maybe there's some indirect things that

happen that benefit the population.

And he actually wrote in his letter, the Lancet letter also

ignored factors that may increase average life expectancy in Gaza.

Bearing in mind that one of the biggest health issues in Gaza prior

to the current war was obesity.

So this fucking UK lawyer, so starving them is good for them.

One of the indirect benefits of what was happening,

Uhhuh,

was a reduction in obesity.

So when you were looking at a population effect and you were taking into an account

indirect detrimental factors mm-hmm.

Then you should take into account indirect beneficial factors such as

a decrease in obesity in the gut.

Why not?

Piece of,

well, and and also, um, I'm, I'm guessing they can't get tobacco,

so there's probably a whole load of them who've given up smoking.

There you go, Joe.

Another one.

Yeah.

That, that's the alternative universe we, that we are just living in.

Like you would think that was something from the onion or from the chaser,

from one of these satirical sort of.

Papers, Joe.

But, but no, this is genuine stuff.

Yeah.

Still, still from the, are we in an alternate universe department, Joe?

You know, the ICC chief prosecutor?

Mm-hmm.

You know?

Oh, yeah.

I've heard wants to, you know, sort of bring Netanyahu

in to face genocide claims.

Mm-hmm.

The USA, you know, frida's, uh, leaders of the free

world, um, world's policemen.

Yeah.

Um, in charge of, um, the rules based order.

Um, our closest ally, the ones we're paying billions of dollars to for

submarines that we'll never get.

Wow.

Yes.

Those, those people are the ones who have sanctioned the ICC prosecutor.

Mm-hmm.

Because he wants to bring Netanyahu to court.

Yes.

And um, according to WikiLeaks article, um, so the Chief prosecutor, Karen Kahn,

has been placed under US sanctions, um, to coerce the court into halting

investigations into Israeli abuses.

So this ICC Chief Prosecutor, his official Microsoft email account has been disabled.

His UK bank account's frozen.

All 900 ICC staff members have been banned from entering the United States accused

of pursuing illegitimate investigations.

And the US government has threatened that any individual or organization

providing Kane with financial material or technological assistance

could face fines or imprisonment.

Hence why Microsoft mm-hmm.

Had to stop providing technological assistance in

the form of an email account.

And, um, and two US-based human rights organizations have confirmed

they've ended cooperation with the ICC one senior official.

Noted that staff are now actively avoiding communicating with the ICC court officials

citing fear of government retaliation.

Just another day in crazy world where we're Trump has done.

Yes, yes.

Yeah.

It wouldn't have been that necessarily that different under Biden.

Oh, maybe not to the same extent, but certainly, um, there was the preemptive

law that said if any American soldier was arrested and brought before the ICC,

they were gonna invade the Netherlands.

Mm-hmm.

And that was passed, uh, 10 years ago.

Mm-hmm.

So,

so there's a law on the books that says the US can

invade, uh, the Netherlands.

Yes.

Uh, Brussels was it?

Or Netherlands?

Netherlands is Brussels.

Uh oh, sorry.

Belgium.

Belgium, yeah.

Yeah.

Yep.

So,

uh, yeah, yeah.

Uh, no.

The Hague is ICC, which is the Netherlands.

Is it?

Right?

Yeah.

Okay.

Uh, yes.

So, yeah.

Yeah.

That was under Biden.

Speaking of Biden, did you hear he's got, um, some sort

of aggressive cancer prostate?

Mm. Like super aggressive.

It's in his bones and stuff already.

Yeah.

Which, given that a president gets regular medical checks must

mean that it happened quite quickly.

Yeah.

And I don't know, I mean, prostate cancer is one of those ones other

than monitoring your PSA and even that's not a very good indicator.

Mm-hmm.

Um, it's quite difficult to tell until it's quite advanced usually.

Anyway, that's, uh, Joe Biden not gonna feel too sorry for him.

Well, he's an old man.

Yes.

Um, yeah, what's, uh, been happening to me as I, as I wander

this wide brown land of, of cafes.

Mm-hmm.

And, um, and RSL and old people.

Yes, that's right.

Uh, the other day, a bunch of boomers, one guy said, you know, Trump is right.

America has to make stuff.

China's cheating, and they open up all those coal-fired power stations.

So, you know, that was the, basically the line.

I sort of made a mental note of what it was.

Okay.

And what percentage of coal fired power stations compared to percentage

of renewables are they opening?

Well,

you're talking facts again, Joe.

I know you.

Yeah.

So

I, I've just listened to David Cranny's book, how Minds Change.

Right.

Which is a study of various techniques used to persuade people.

Mm-hmm.

A and the long and short of it is there's no point arguing facts because people

don't make decisions based on facts.

Yeah.

Uh, they make decisions based on whether or not they're gonna be excluded

from the group they're a member of.

Yeah.

It's kind of like we have to just start these things with

what would it take for Yeah.

To change your mind.

Like, what, what, what would I need to produce in order to change your mind on

mm-hmm.

China's, um, bad guys because of their building coal-fired power stations.

Like, could you just name something that I could present that might change your mind?

Because I remember you, Joe.

Mm-hmm.

Back in the days when we were in the secular party, in the library

at the Prince City Council said.

Uh, what would it take to, to convince you, Trevor, that there

really is a God, for example?

Yeah,

I, I, that, that has stumped me for a long time.

Yeah.

And I said something like, ah, look, I guess if, if, you know, the clouds

opened up, bolts of lightning, started raining down, and a vision of some God

appeared and, and started pronouncing stuff, um, uh, you know, right in front

of my eyes, then maybe I would, and you said, do you remember what you said?

Uh, I'm guessing, but it's more likely that you're suffering from

psychosis than a God who's talking to you.

That's

exactly right.

That's what you said.

Yeah.

Would be, and you're right.

It would be more likely that I'm suffering some sort of psychosis.

So not even that would, yeah, yeah, yeah.

Yeah.

So.

Um,

and, and this is the problem.

I mean it when you look at your own core beliefs, and I think

it's important that we all investigate what we take us through.

Okay.

Uh, it's, it's, yeah.

Okay.

I've, how would I know if I was wrong?

Mm-hmm.

And I, and I think that's important that all of us look at everything we assume

and go, if I was wrong, how would I know?

Yeah.

How, how would I, how would I know Joe, if there really were North Koreans Yes.

Come operating with the Ukrainian, you know, it could have been that

they're just trolling us and there weren't none there, but No, no, no.

I won't go there.

But, but yeah,

I'm, yeah, absolutely.

It might have been a misinformation, uh, by the Ukrainians and the South Koreans

and the North Koreans and the Russians have bought into it and carried on.

Yes.

But I

probably not.

I'll just tap.

It's not that important.

I can just go with it.

Yeah.

Well, yeah, and it's, it's kind of who benefits.

That's right.

So, um, yeah, where were we?

So anyway, um, I thought, ah, next time I've run into that particular boomer

in that cafe, if I hear that again, I need to just know a few facts and, um,

quickly looked up, you know, 'cause intuitively, um, what I think about

with China and carbon emissions, Joe is.

There's no doubt that they're massively transferring to renewables.

Yeah.

Like they are building so much solar, wind, um, hydro power stuff.

Mm-hmm.

That they're very, very genuine about converting to renewable energy.

And the other part I think about is that, um, it's the world's factory and

it's easy for us producing services to not emit carbon, but when you are

making, and you still do y yes, it, it's easy, but we still don't do it.

But when you are the, when you are the world's manufacturer and you are building

cars and you are using power and you are knocking things together and you

are refining stuff and you're just, um, applying heat to things, then you are

naturally involved in tasks that are more heavily dependent on using carbon.

And people just don't give credit for that.

No.

And plus of course, there's a huge population.

So when you wanna do it on a per person basis, that's the other calculation.

Well,

particularly if you do it on a per person basis over time.

Right.

Because, uh, less Australia, but certainly Europe was a huge, um, emitter of

carbon during the industrial revolution.

Indeed.

And that's the other thing, if you look over time and say, well,

you've reached a position now where you potentially don't have to

Yeah.

Uh, generate so many carbon emissions because you've moved into

a first world developed situation.

So you've gotta give everybody else some opportunity to do that.

So yes,

I mean, it, it's sensible for China because the levels of pollution,

they're suffering in their cities.

Mm-hmm.

Um, and, and so they, uh, the embrace of.

Small electric vehicles, motorbikes.

Now there's an awful lot of electric motorbikes.

They're cheap.

Mm, mm-hmm.

I mean, they don't have the safety standards, but they're knocking these

electric vehicles out so cheaply now.

Mm-hmm.

Um, that I think they will leapfrog us.

In fact, I'm sure they have already leapfrogged us in terms of number

of, uh, electric vehicles taken up, amount of solar that's on roofs.

Um, just because they don't have the infrastructure, they

don't have the baggage there.

I will get onto some facts and figures, uh, in the chat room.

Good comment.

Don.

Don says, the fact that Trevor was proven wrong and has to buy everyone

coffees is proof that God exists.

Yes, indeed.

So, um, but what have I got here?

You know, these facts, you can find them.

It, it's so easy.

So, CO2 emission emissions in tons.

Uh, this is 2022 figures.

Uh, China, of course, um, 12, uh, what would that be?

12,666,428,430 tons of CO2 emissions, but per capita, 8.89, somewhere

like the United States, which has a third of the total of the CO2

emissions, but per capita, 14.21.

Australia,

a fraction in total of the CO2 emissions, but per person 15.01.

So the first thing to say is at 2022 emission levels per person, China is well

below so many other countries, despite the fact that it is the, um, the world's

factory and, uh, as an excuse for, um,

and a lot of those emissions are to do with building

Yeah, yeah.

No doubt.

And infrastructure.

So, um, uh, what else did I have here?

Yeah, so you can find that sort of stuff.

Um, uh,

yes, but according to the Heartlands facts,

the Heartlands facts,

oh, Heartland is a US institute, uh, of climate change deniers.

Oh, okay.

Yeah, yeah, yeah.

Um,

uh, that would say something completely different.

The, the other one I got, uh, I saw this interesting article, which is,

but uh, China is building more coal plants, coal fired power plants.

They are, yes.

And they are.

So, so why is it if renewables are such a convincing and cheaper method

of power generation, why are the Chinese still building coal fired power

stations if solar and wind are so cheap?

And, uh, in this article basically, uh, had links to various facts and

figures, but it was saying that, um, yes, China is opening new coal plants.

And in 2023, for example, it added almost 50 gigawatts, which was about the same.

As the already existing installed capacity in Indonesia, Germany, or Japan.

So in one year it's adding what the others sort of have in total already.

And, uh, it hasn't retired much.

And um, what they're saying though is that the plants, um, these coal fired

power plants in the two thousands were running at 70% of the time.

Now they're running at around 50% of the time.

So there's more of them, but they're running for less of the time.

So the actual, um, use or, um, what would you say, uh, emissions from it

aren't necessarily greater because even though there's more of them,

they're not being fired up as much and um, they're running at a loss.

A lot of them, almost 50% of these plants are running at a loss.

And the question would be, well, why would the Chinese run them at a loss?

And, uh, one argument would be that, um,

uh, what does it say here, um,

just for safety's sake as abundance proportion.

Yep.

Because China has reserves of coal mm-hmm.

But doesn't have reserves of gas, which is what most countries

would use as their sort of backup.

And China doesn't want to have to rely on other countries for gas.

Uh, wonder why Joe, like, uh, it's tactically Yes, un understandable.

And somehow the Chinese are also, um, requiring or, or seeking that the

plants can be switched on and off.

More flexibly than what we're used to with coal fired gener power stations here,

which provide base load and are difficult to, to sort of turn off and turn on.

So they're apparently, uh, using ones that have a bit more capacity to be

switched on and off more flexibly.

The other arguments are that it's local provincial governments that organize

them and they don't really care about a lot of issues that other people do.

And surely they care about pollution though it's, it's a nod to their KPIs

if they've got development happening.

So, uh, and if there's too many of them, um, then they don't care.

So that's kind of like people say, ah, the problem with command

economies is that they, um, don't respond to market forces very well.

Potentially, and this might be an example of that mm-hmm.

Where these provincial Chinese governments are not responding to

market demand, but just building these things because it's good for a

KPI of development that assists them.

Uh, and what was the other argument here?

Um, um,

yeah, and you can look at all sorts of other figures in terms of renewables

being, um, solar and, and wind and, and, um, hydro that we've talked about.

So it's a sort of a interesting nuanced sort of answer as to why

the Chinese building coal fired power stations, if renewables are

so cheap, the answers are, they're building a shit load of renewables.

They're still building the coal, but they're not turning them

on as much as they used to.

They're trying to use 'em as a flexible option 'cause they don't have gas.

And it almost might sound a bit crazy and stupid, but that's got provincial

government happening in a command economy rather than a market economy.

And uh,

although you can turn coal into gas, right?

I dunno if you get less emissions from doing that.

I don't know you turn into, but that's totally different to sort

of natural gas that we're correct.

Yeah.

Yeah.

So, um, so,

um, town gas for years in the uk, in, in a lot of the world, uh, they

heated up coal and turned it into gas.

Right?

Or you drive off the gas basically.

Okay.

Um, so yeah, so that was, uh, that little experience.

And then the other experience I had online, one of my friends who very

right wing, posted a thing on Facebook, which was an article from the A, B, C.

Titled one of Australia's first Wind Farms faces decommissioning due to cost.

And this friend wrote the comment above it, wind Farm decommissioned

in Western Australia because cost of new blades too expensive.

Why is the a LP funding more farms with subsidy subsidies

a money pit, exclamation mark.

So on the face of it, you know, if you are a friend and you see that and you go,

huh, these wind farms aren't so crash hot.

Like this one's come to the end of its life.

They can't afford to put new blades on it 'cause it's too expensive.

You know, it's just this, uh, wind farm stuff looks like a load of bollocks.

Well, what about oid?

What's, what's the story with oid?

Well, you're blowing up,

it's a coal, coal fired power station that's blown up

twice in the last five years.

Yeah.

But when you actually read this article, what it says is.

The, the, the, the wind turbine fan stuff that was put here in this

place over 20 years ago mm-hmm.

Is a smaller type and, and less effective and, and would be

replaced now by four larger ones.

Is, is what would go in here and the site could only handle four of these large ones

and that would generate, uh, electricity.

Um, that just isn't, it isn't worth creating a site with just

four of these wind things on them.

You wanna put 'em in a site where you can do 20 or 30 of the things to make it

all worthwhile for the infrastructure.

So it was really a case of wind technology has been so successful that the, that the.

The, what do we call 'em, Joe Windmills, generators, what do we call turbines?

Turbines are so effective that rather than a dozen of these smaller

ones, you'd have four large ones.

And, um, it just isn't worthwhile to put four in this place for all the effort and

you're much better just going somewhere else where you can put more of them.

So it was nothing to do with, um, a failure.

It was actually a, a success story of wind farms.

It just pisses me off that Smart people.

Yeah.

I mean it's, and, and so Australia has very few wind farms, but if you look at

Europe Mm, they have huge wind farms.

Mm. And if they were so crap, Europe wouldn't be investing in them.

Mm-hmm.

And, and maybe Europe, if it was in Australia, would be investing

in solar because that's the better solution for Australian climate.

Mm-hmm.

Um, but I would say there's large areas of coastline here that get lots of wind.

Yeah.

And, and a mix of solar and, and wind would be great.

And then of course, people complained that they were unsightly, so

they said, okay, we'll stick 'em away.

Out in the ocean over there.

Yep.

You'll have to squint your eyes to see them.

And people would go, oh, what about the poor whales?

They'll run into 'em.

Like, there's a lot of people last people on earth who actually worry about whales.

But

there, there's also the whole, uh, bird strikes, you

know, uh, wind farms kill birds.

Mm-hmm.

Apparently an equivalent.

Coal fired Power Station kills.

I can't remember the exact number.

It's something like 10 times the number of birds.

Right.

Okay.

And why aren't people

up in arms about the coal fired power stations with the

pollution that's killing the birds?

Yeah, but they're so worried about the wind turbines killing the birds.

Yeah.

Yeah.

Uh, a comment in the chat, Andrew says, what about if Croc

referenced Gaza in every item?

Would you support that?

N no.

It's gonna be no.

Only if it's relevant to whatever the question was.

So,

I, I mean, I think we shouldn't be talking to Grock for facts anyway.

Yeah.

But, uh,

LLMs are crap at facts.

Yeah.

So, um, so in short, no, I wouldn't support that.

Um, um, yes.

And what other experiences have I had, uh, speaking with lefty friends?

Uh, I think of the election, the greens, you know, they went too

far and they refused to compromise.

On housing?

Yes.

Okay.

And I had to remind them, and I, now I've just sort of reminded myself

of the exact, um, sort of situation.

But back in September, 2023, the Greens agreed to support the Albanese governments

$10 billion Housing Australia Future Fund, half guaranteeing it would pass the

Senate after months of bid negotiations.

And, um, and at that time, they had managed to secure a further $1 billion

for public and community housing.

So in September, 2023, by holding off, they had secured an extra

billion from the government that the government didn't want to provide.

And prior to that, in June, Albanese announced a further 2 billion for

social and affordable housing.

Because the greens were holding out and withholding their support.

So in total it was $3 billion that the greens got out of the Labor

party that they didn't wanna spend.

Um, so, so they refused to compromise for several months while they

haggled and eventually they, uh, said, okay, that deal's good enough.

And as, uh, in episode 400, we reported, dear listener, uh, back in the day

when Guy Rundel was still a crikey, I wonder where Guy Del's got to, uh, he

got sacked 'cause um, um, of a reason.

I can't remember, but I was really hoping he would turn up somewhere.

Um, so he said, well, the Greens have been rewarded for their political courage

in holding out on the housing bill.

Um.

So they voted with the coalition against it.

In order to get more in the Senate, they showed up independent David

Pocock as inexperienced and weak.

Pocock voted for the initial half and then had to scramble to get on the green side

when the party won the first 2 billion of actual money for the fund, having then

urged the greens to vote for the bill.

After that, he will now have to adjust his position again

to welcome the next billion.

So the greens taught pocock a lesson in, in not compromising for a while

to extract stuff that you want.

It's, and yet it's the greens who get the reputation as being crazies

who, who refused to compromise.

Um, but they extracted stuff and eventually compromised.

And then the most recent occasion was in November, 2024, where the Greens got

an extra 500 million added to the Social Housing Energy performance Initiative.

Um, as part of their haggling and they eventually passed the government bills.

So it just pisses me off that even amongst the lefty friendly people, we still get

the line that the greens were killed.

Compromising

clowns.

What's that, Joe?

They killed off the e ets.

Right?

Nothing to do with, nothing to do with the Mad Bishop.

Yeah.

Ah, so, yeah.

Um, uh, sorry.

Uh, back in the chat room, being a bit facetious, but you did say very

news build and should start with Gaza stories and you felt like it was

inappropriate to talk about anything else.

Well, they should, Andrew, when a hospital's been bombed, when a kid's

been hit by a sniper, when a group of kids have had a hand grenade,

well a drone bombs dropped on them.

Uh, if nothing's happened that particular day.

Probably Okay.

Don't do anything.

But you'd probably find that almost every day something has happened of that sort,

that if it happened anywhere else on the planet would be wall to wall coverage.

I think he's saying if it should be leading the news,

then it should be leading grok.

Right.

And I would say that no, the news and gr are two different things.

Yes.

Okay.

Yeah.

I, you know, anyway, I think Andrew's kind of on side, but kinda making a point.

Yeah, yeah, yeah.

Um, where was I in my rant about the greens?

So, yeah.

Um, yeah, that was that

bunch of bloody watermelons.

Speaking of really crazy people, Joe.

Mm-hmm.

What about those pasts in particular one that you mentioned?

I. Uh, from Indonesia.

What did he get up to?

Oh, yeah.

Well, no, he wasn't the crazy person.

Well, he wasn't, he the Pastorium was not the crazy person.

No.

No.

Mm.

So he wrote, uh, a letter, an open letter, and I can't remember what it,

it was about religious discrimination.

And he's been forced to leave the country because of death threats.

Because he was poking fun at Islam by being a Pastor Farian.

Yes.

He wrote to the Minister of Religious Affairs for the Republic of Indonesia,

uh, requesting full and proper recognition of the Flying Spaghetti monster.

Yes.

Um, as, uh, as a true God.

And that didn't go down well.

No.

And, and now he's being, um, I.

He has apparently escaped to Australia.

Mm. And I think he's applied for, um, uh, asylum, for religious persecution.

He's probably have pretty fair case by looks of things.

Yeah, yeah.

Although, I dunno that the Australian government will agree to his case because

Pastor Arianism, isn't it real religion?

Yes.

But can it still be religious discrimination?

That's a good question.

Well, I, I think we should recognize it as a real religion because

it's as real as any of the others.

Indeed it is.

Yeah.

Yeah.

Joe, I think we're almost ready to talk post-election stuff.

Mm-hmm.

And, uh, Scott never made it, I held this aside for Scott, but, uh,

I dunno what's happened to Scott.

So, uh, what have we got in terms of maybe he

got lucky.

Um, maybe he did.

Hang on a minute.

I'm all.

Just dunno where his partner is.

If his partner's in Brisbane, then we don't wanna be saying that, do we?

Uh, um, yeah.

Uh, let me see.

This one from Dan.

Ick is the one that I want.

Um, yes, Joe.

I mean, we've had recriminations have we?

In the liberal party, we had the leadership fight and Oh, yeah, yeah.

Essentially got people arguing over the party.

Wasn't far right enough.

Well, um, uh, Gina was saying that the party wasn't far right.

Enough

Yes.

Particularly needed to take on Donald Trump-like policies.

Oh, absolutely, yes.

Yeah.

So bit of chaos in the liberal party.

Um.

Here's, uh, I, I'm

hoping for that.

Here's a reporter, which this, this one is more video than audios.

So for the pe for the six people watching you get this in its

full glory, um, here it is.

Nothing could be further from the truth, Veronica.

We want all Australians to know that.

Sure.

It's been a tough few weeks here at the liberal party and yes, we've had our

disagreements, but we want you to know that's just made us even warn United.

We fully backed Tony Abbott to go to the next election to

fight Kevin Rudd and to win.

So Prime Minister Rudd, if you're listening, look out the lip.

Uh, I found that particularly funny, but, um, it's a bit old.

But yes.

Showing the United, although having said that, labor are

not exactly united, are they?

Yeah.

So Sky News is saying that, um, that.

Uh, of course the Liberal National Party.

Were not right wing enough.

Mm-hmm.

Here's Roe and Dean's take on the election, sort of, um, result.

But first, the future of Australia as a cohesive, peaceful,

relaxed, comfortable, and prosperous nation is now extremely unlikely,

at least for the next few years.

I said repeatedly that the May three election was the most important of

our lives, and so it has turned out to be in the worst possible way.

There is no sugar coating what has occurred.

It was the perfect storm, a canny and cunning labor party, an utterly inept

opposition and the perversity of our idiotic, compulsory preferential voting

system, which together have left us with a hard left government that two thirds of

the population did not vote for wielding an unbelievably dangerous level of power.

Poor fellow, my country, I. To put it bluntly with hard left labor holding

a massive majority in the lower house and the Marxist Greens holding the

balance of power in the Senate Australia is now to all intents and purposes,

oh no, not the Marxist greens hard left.

Mm.

They're not even left

on, on what planet are they?

Hard left.

They're not even left.

The, the, the Australian Labor Party today mm-hmm.

Is, is center Right.

It's not a left wing party at all.

Richard Miles is head of the right faction of the Labor Party, and he is more at

home with his liberal opposition than he is with, with, with left-wing politics.

Mm-hmm.

It's a nonsense to say that these guys are left, let

alone the dreaded socialists.

Um, but

only a third of Australians voted for, uh, labor.

Yes.

And, and less than a third voted for the liberals.

He didn't

mention that part.

No, exactly.

And then the Marxist Greens, God's sake, just the history on of these things.

So it

sounds, it sounds like he wants first passed the post.

Yes.

Does, because preferential voting allowing you to vote for

an independent, how dare they?

Yes.

Yeah.

But, um, sky News has been, they, they're not happy with Susan Lee.

Mm-hmm.

And they think that she's, well, no,

she's farty liberal.

Well,

they, yes.

They don't think she's, she's, she's, she's a little commie, um mm-hmm.

Infiltrator.

Yeah.

So that they're worried about, so.

They're straight on to criticizing her.

They're not giving her a chance at all.

Um,

well, I actually heard there's a reason that they've elected her.

Mm-hmm.

Because it's a lame dog po uh, position.

Mm-hmm.

Uh, that she's got no hope of getting elected anytime in the near future.

Mm-hmm.

So put a woman in the position, look like we're doing something.

Mm.

And then when it comes time to either win the election or she loses

it badly Mm. We replace her and put somebody that's white male in there.

Yes.

Uh, and in the meantime we can look to be progressive whilst actually doing nothing.

So Andrew Hasty didn't even run and I'm sure that he's thinking,

why would I just spend the next three years copying shit when I can just

gather that together, my forces, it's gonna be horrendous for her.

Mm-hmm.

Let her deal with it and I'll come in as the answer when,

when things are looking miserable.

Um, so this is the sort of thing going on over at Sky News.

You get the

sense that a lot of people, uh, whether it's in the party or out of

it, do feel like, uh, perhaps Susan Lee is a placeholder in this or has

been appointed because she is a woman.

And that's what so much of the criticism of the party has been about.

Whether it's true or not, you can't escape the perception that there's a

bit of a token woman feel about this.

Uh, disappointment.

Yeah.

Look, I, I'll be pretty blunt here.

She's been in the parliament for 24 years.

Most punters wouldn't have an idea who she is.

I mean, most, most journalists, I'm listening to them, dunno whether

to call her Susan Lee or Susan Lay.

I mean, such as her cut through in that time.

Now she is a placeholder.

I doubt that, uh, she will stray very far from her real opinions about,

you know, Palestine, some of the woke things that she really, uh, has always

advocated, who would give their heart earned to this shambles of a party?

One liberal donor describes Susan Lee to me as a lemon, and that's brutal.

But the reality is Susan Lee is a placeholder.

She's not the answer.

No one believes that the current leader will ever be Prime Minister.

Now, Susan Lee also wanted to be Shadow Minister for Foreign Affairs

when Simon Birmingham retired.

But Peter Dutton didn't think,

yeah, I like that bit, Joe.

Mm-hmm.

Peter Dutton that didn't think she was up to the job.

Hasn't he proved to be such an, an Nostradamus?

What a great operator he was.

Exactly.

Like, we should really be listening to Peter Dutton still.

Oh.

Although I did hear her described as the team who, Liz Truss.

Yes.

The team who, Liz Trust.

Yes.

Mm-hmm.

But, you know, but you know, a criticism of her that Peter Dutton didn't think

she was up to, to snuff, for God's sake.

Who cares what Peter Dutton thinks?

He turned out to be hopeless.

It's probably a good thing for, for anybody on their cv.

It was good enough.

Peter Dutton didn't like them

yet.

She's now the leader of the party make of that where you will.

But at least 25 members in the liberal party don't have confidence in her.

And under her leadership, the party will remain divided.

There will be no unity.

It was divided under all of them, wasn't it?

Crimey River?

Um, like that crappy stuff that you just heard, that is what

liberal party members mm-hmm.

Are listening to.

That's where they get their opinions from.

Yep.

And liberal party politicians.

Have to listen to Sky News to know what their constituents

are thinking as in their liberal party membership constituents.

Because even if they weren't thinking that beforehand, after

a few sessions on, uh, sky News, that's what they will be thinking.

So

yeah, there was also a bit of, um, turmoil about Senator Price.

And who was she standing with?

Uh, Taylor.

Yes.

Yes.

And um, he was my pick.

'cause I thought he was the one who wanted it the most, but, um, he missed out.

So she swapped the liberals?

Yeah.

But then I think she didn't stand and people were upset because she

moved and then she didn't stand.

Yeah.

She thinks one day she's gonna be Prime Minister.

She thinks people want her as the first Aboriginal

Prime Minister.

Yeah.

So maybe.

Yeah.

So, um, so that was, that was those bits.

Um, so the knives are out for her.

Um, um, we had Richard Miles,

so this,

you know, the other thing that some friends of mine lefties

were saying was, you know, well,

uh, the Labor Party had a tiptoe during their first term, but now they've

been elected in their second term.

Now they've got a chance to, it's a labor party.

They've got a chance to really do some progressive things.

And I said, look, they're not interested in progressive things,

and, and you've only just gotta look at what Richard Miles just pulled

off, like as part of factional deals.

He got two minutes to sacked and replaced by two others, and

Albanese didn't stand up to him.

So, so the worst performer in the, in the Labor Party, Richard Miles

mm-hmm.

The defense.

Minister responsible for continuing the stupid orca deal is, is like pulling

the strings as to factional numbers.

And Albanese was like, oh, okay.

If that's the factional deal, I'll just accept it.

So the factions work out who's going to be in the ministry and Albanese

then decides which ministry they get.

But he, after that victory, surely could have put his foot down and

said, no, let's be sensible here.

But Richard knows the long knives.

Yeah, exactly.

So that's where we are there.

Um, uh, you mentioned Gina Reinhardt.

Uh, she has singled out Italy and Hungary currently governed by

populist right wing coalitions.

Countries.

Well Hung is ruled by a dictator.

Hmm.

These are countries that Australia could aspire to according to.

Um, Gina Reinhardt, uh, if only the liberals would stick with Trump-like

policies and abandon the myth.

The two could be a

fascist state.

Yes.

Yes.

And abandoned the myths and untruths of the left.

Uh, she put this out in a statement to the Daily Mail and, um, she says

The left media did a very successful effort, frightening many in the

liberal party from anything Trump and away from any Trump-like policies.

Yes.

'cause I think, um, sky News were scaring people away from Trump-Like policies.

Yes.

Yeah.

Uh,

yeah.

I think most Australians have looked at Trump and gone,

we don't wanna borrow that.

Yeah.

She has said, as I've repeatedly stated, we need to cut government tape

regulations, government's, wastage, and tax burdens across Australia.

Yeah.

She wants.

To excise the north of Australia from the tax system so she can run

her minds as a tax free enterprise.

She says what we need is a US style Doge, Elon Musk type thing.

Yeah.

And again, you know why?

'cause Doge has cut out all oversight for industry

Mm.

And cut all the funding for poor people.

What we really need is a wealth tax.

Yes.

Where after, you know, $500 billion, something like that, um, you get

whacked with a wealth tax and

do, do they even need 500?

I think a hundred is more than sufficient.

Fine.

I'm with you there.

And if we just did that, um, and voted for it and said, fuck you Gina R up.

Yeah.

Uh, wouldn't that be fun?

But only some of the crazy greens would, you know, come up with an idea like that.

Only some of the crazy greens would vote in Parliament Firm.

Yes.

Because too many of the other politicians are beholden to their patrons.

Yeah.

Sorry.

Um, uh, our, our, our institute interested in the constituents.

Yes.

Yes.

Yeah.

Uh, well, we didn't get onto, um, hopefully the 14th.

Not much to say, um,

fall apart from him bagging Trump a couple of times.

Yes.

Yeah.

Just a final thought on Trump.

Mm-hmm.

Remember the Lion King when scarred cheated to win the titles King

and the Pride Land was overrun with the hyenas and all of the lines lost

everything they had built and maintained.

Just asking no reason.

Uh, oh, one thing, Joe Alcatraz.

Oh yeah.

For God's sake, the guy watches a movie.

I. Apparently escape from Alcatraz was being shown in the area

where he is living at Mar Largo.

Right.

And the next day he comes out with, I'm gonna reopen Al

should reopen Alcatraz and put all the hardened criminals in there.

I, I mean, anyone who's actually been to Alcatraz, and I haven't been, I've only

seen it from a distance, realizes that it's, it's just not economically feasible.

It's just the most expensive place Yeah.

To put a jail.

Yes.

And it's not as if, it's not as if hardened criminals are escaping from

maximum security all the time, Joe.

No.

And

that there's a real problem.

But this is the crazy nonsense that, uh, that's going on there.

It's honestly, I had, uh, I'd probably have about two dozen clips of Trump

saying something crazy, corrupt, stupid.

Mm-hmm.

Yeah.

Everything from Alcatraz through to free planes from

Al Qatar.

Qatar, yeah.

The $400 million plane.

Yeah.

Which isn't going to be given to the US government.

It's gonna be given to Trump.

And we'll go to the presidential library.

So when he's no longer president, he can still personally use it.

Yeah.

But as the guy said, on Planet America, like you, when you don't just grab a

plane and it becomes Air Force one, it needs all sorts of, it needs communication

gear and uh, and special stuff in it.

Plus you've gotta scour the whole thing to make sure the Qatari

didn't put listening devices on it.

Mm-hmm.

Just, and then apparently, you know, by the time you've done all that,

we're onto our next president anyway.

Um, so yeah, from Alcatraz to planes to, to his dodgy Bitcoin shit and a thousand

or one other shitty things, it's like.

What that Steve Bannon said.

You can just flood the space with so many stories that Yeah.

That nobody can, can properly Yes.

Comprehend or assess or take in or ingest each just the sheer volume of them.

Yes.

Um, apparently Trump,

oh, there, there's, um, some other country, or maybe it was Kael, um,

apparently there's gonna be some new Trump development in some other

country that they're obviously angling for, um, US money for something.

Right.

So Trump has just got permission from one government somewhere

down in the Middle East.

So they're, they, they must be looking for favors.

Yeah.

And, and just a,

a, a bunch of things in terms of the separation of

powers and the, and abuse of the.

The system.

Anyway, it's too many to catalog, um, and run through.

And this lu is attacking my throat.

It's getting very ticklish.

I've gotta stop.

We'll be back next week maybe with Scott.

Not sure, uh, but we'll have some stories of some sort.

Thanks in the chat room.

You've been very good.

Thank you for your comments and um, we'll be back next week.

Talk to you then.

Bye for now.

And it's a good night from me

and it's a good night from him.

Good night.