Speaker:

Happy New Year, everyone. Here's to another 365 days of disrupting the status quo and trying

Speaker:

to bring down capitalism, one episode at a time. My name is Jessa and this is Blueprints of

Speaker:

Disruption. It's been a few weeks now since 55,000 Canadian postal workers were ordered

Speaker:

back to work by the Liberals and the Canadian Industrial Relations Board. Anytime we hear

Speaker:

that the right to strike has been undermined, we understandably get upset. This is the tool

Speaker:

of workers, right? Withholding or modifying our collective labor is one of the only real

Speaker:

pieces of leverage we have over our bosses. I'm sure that's not even news to any of you,

Speaker:

but this wasn't just any strike. This was Cup W and Canada Post did their workers dirty.

Speaker:

They didn't even try to bargain in good faith because they knew the precedent had already

Speaker:

been set. that the feds would undermine their constitutional rights and force yet another

Speaker:

contract on them. One of the most historically successful unions in Canada has seemingly lost

Speaker:

the ability to negotiate a deal with their bosses. Even with a 96% strike mandate, many concessions,

Speaker:

and almost five weeks walking the line. On the day they were ordered back to work, A CupW

Speaker:

Strike captain and shop steward sat down with me to talk about what the posties were demanding

Speaker:

and just why this latest development was such a blow to them. You'll hear details on the

Speaker:

back and forth with the greedy bosses at Canada Post. But come on, all of that was to be expected.

Speaker:

Bosses will be bosses. What becomes hard to accept and to hear is the lack of courage coming

Speaker:

from union leadership. They chose pragmatism again in their ever-weakening position. Because

Speaker:

on December 17th, when there should have been a massive display of defiance by Canadian labor

Speaker:

and allies, there wasn't even a handful of lines being held. No other labor union or coalition

Speaker:

officially walked with them. The odd flag showed up, but these numbers were in the dozens, not

Speaker:

the hundreds or thousands that it should have been. It was also crickets from the leader

Speaker:

of the federal NDP, the so-called Workers' Party. They spent none of their resources trying to

Speaker:

protect the right to strike in Canada in that moment. CUPW, whose strikes have helped set

Speaker:

employment standards we all benefit from, was out on their own. All our social media posts

Speaker:

and statements of solidarity translated into nothing meaningful when it was needed. We taught

Speaker:

the bosses a lesson that day, but it wasn't the one they should have been learning. They

Speaker:

should have witnessed the power of Canadian labor and the willingness of elected union

Speaker:

leaders to take risks in key moments, because this was a key moment. So, as it usually is,

Speaker:

the work is left to the rank and file. So let's hear from them. Welcome to Blueprint Sarah.

Speaker:

Can you introduce yourself to the audience, please? Hi, my name's Sarah. I'm a shop steward

Speaker:

with CPW Local 626 and a letter carrier. I also served as a picket captain for the last five

Speaker:

weeks that we've been on strike. You said it this time, right? Five weeks is a long time

Speaker:

to be a picket captain. So I can imagine today, emotions are very raw. For the audience, we're

Speaker:

on Tuesday, December 17th, talking to Sarah and- This is the day that Cup W workers have

Speaker:

been ordered back to work. Before we get into what that five weeks was like, let's help our

Speaker:

audience better understand the strike, you know, the meat and potatoes of why you folks were

Speaker:

on strike in the first place. Yeah, absolutely. The union was really left with no other choice

Speaker:

but to initiate strike action by Canada Post, who has fundamentally disrespected us. for

Speaker:

the last several years, six years that I've worked for this corporation. What they've tried

Speaker:

to do to us is they've tried to fundamentally restructure the way all of the work is done

Speaker:

at the post office. That restructuring affects everybody. It includes letter carriers like

Speaker:

myself, as well as people who work indoors. And the broad strokes of what they're trying

Speaker:

to do to us is to reduce our job security, reduce our benefits. reduce our pensions. And they're

Speaker:

trying to segregate the workforce yet more between casual flex employees and full-time employees.

Speaker:

This isn't just going to be, this isn't just going to hurt new employees who are hired under

Speaker:

the casual flex model, which is really gigification of our job, but it will affect everyone. For

Speaker:

example, the corporation has tried to implement something. two letter carriers called separate

Speaker:

sort and delivery. When I was hired with Canada post, what we would do is we would daily prepare

Speaker:

our mail, um, which meant we would sort our own mail and then we would take it out for

Speaker:

the day's delivery. This included mail, parcels and flyers. This gave them letter carriers

Speaker:

control over how their route was delivered. It gave them knowledge of where hazards were

Speaker:

on their route and were able to adjust their mail accordingly. And it was a fundamentally

Speaker:

much more efficient system for delivery than what the corporation is trying to implement.

Speaker:

The routes that letter carriers are being asked to do by the corporation have become fundamentally

Speaker:

inhumane. There's no other way to word what is being done. Letter carriers are being asked

Speaker:

to walk upwards of 30. 40 kilometers a day on routes which entail 9,000 stairs. They're being

Speaker:

asked to drive through Toronto traffic to get to these locations and being asked to do this

Speaker:

all in an eight-hour day. I'm not an Olympic athlete and asking me to do what is essentially

Speaker:

a marathon every day

Speaker:

is an absurd ask. On top of this, letter carriers are blamed. for their own health and safety

Speaker:

issues. The corporation was recently found by the Supreme Court of Canada to not be responsible

Speaker:

for health and safety issues that happen outside of the workplace, namely everywhere a letter

Speaker:

carrier goes. So they don't investigate those hazards. Wait a minute, wait a minute, sorry.

Speaker:

The places a letter carrier walks and delivers mail while being paid is not considered the

Speaker:

workplace? You're talking about like a sorting facility or where they pick up the mail or

Speaker:

park the vehicle and that's it. Yes. And that's all that the corporation is expected to have

Speaker:

general control over. And therefore the only thing that the corporation is really concerned

Speaker:

about when it comes to health and safety is the direct workplace where under SSD letter

Speaker:

carriers spend less than 30 to 40 minutes a day. If we get injured. We're often blamed

Speaker:

for our own injuries. We're often accused of rushing, which doesn't make any sense when

Speaker:

you're putting expectations on us of going 30 to 40 kilometers on our feet in a day, while

Speaker:

carrying increasingly heavy loads. The corporation has put an extreme focus, and I'm probably

Speaker:

annoying a lot of your listeners, but it is the corporation's major focus is on delivery

Speaker:

of ads in neighborhood mail. which we provide an essential service to Canadians, it's no

Speaker:

doubt, but the corporation is far more interested in these ads. And those ads can constitute

Speaker:

massive weights on the back of a letter carrier. We're talking for a loop that a letter carrier

Speaker:

has to do. It could be 60, 80 pounds of ad mail alone before you factor in the parcels, packets,

Speaker:

and like all the mail that the carrier has to deliver along that area. The major problem

Speaker:

that has always been the issue for letter carriers is that there's no time value given to the

Speaker:

carrier to deliver the flyers. The flyers are considered incentive piecemeal work, which

Speaker:

means we're paid one penny per flyer we deliver, but we don't get any time in our day. This

Speaker:

puts letter carriers into an untenable position, which essentially forces them into overtime

Speaker:

almost every day. The corporation doesn't like that the carriers are doing this. But their

Speaker:

solution is not to fix their measurement system. Their solution is to compact the amount of

Speaker:

time that the carrier spends in the depot by removing their need to sort the mail. The issue

Speaker:

is that previously, this was an unspoken truth, but it was a truth nonetheless, is that what

Speaker:

letter carriers were doing to make this situation work is they would prioritize that section

Speaker:

of delivery where they had the flyers for the day, and they would prioritize their parcels.

Speaker:

Then they would reintegrate the mail that was not in the priority section into the next day

Speaker:

delivery and just continue doing that. Which is not an ideal solution because it delays

Speaker:

the delivery of people's mail, but it was a solution that the letter carriers were forced

Speaker:

into. What the corporation has done by taking away our ability to sort and prepare our own

Speaker:

mail is actually deprive us of the ability to even do that. So now the corporation is putting

Speaker:

these expectations on us. that we will complete the entirety of a 30 kilometer route every

Speaker:

day despite knowing full well that much of what we deliver and which takes a significant amount

Speaker:

of time is not factored into route delivery. I mean and these are just your grievances,

Speaker:

some of your grievances for this particular work stoppage but Canada Post has a history

Speaker:

of being a shit employer. Right? Like this is upon layer upon layer of changes that have

Speaker:

happened to carriers and other workers within Canada Post over the years, the removal of

Speaker:

rural delivery. I know that was a liberal policy, but it's just, Cup W workers have not had it

Speaker:

easy for many, many years facing up against this employer. The timing of the strike is

Speaker:

likely what's on the lips of a lot of people talking to family members about the strike,

Speaker:

right? Let's be honest, there's certain times of the year where folks wouldn't feel the pinch

Speaker:

so bad and I kind of likened it to the teachers when they strike. It's really, really hard

Speaker:

to get the public to fully understand it when they're inconvenienced. I mean, I know that

Speaker:

is so lame to say, cause we can definitely unpack. why strikes are like the front line of the

Speaker:

working class against capital or one of the front lines. Me and you understand that value,

Speaker:

but you know, it's when it's like, oh, they're put out. It's, they find it harder to stand

Speaker:

in solidarity, obviously. So why did this happen around Christmas time? Was that a strategic

Speaker:

move by Cup W or was that initiated by the employer? more than patient with the employer. I mean,

Speaker:

we've been bargaining with them for over a year. Our demands have been known by the corporation

Speaker:

for over a year. We asked for raises in line with inflation to help us keep up with the

Speaker:

growing cost of food, with the growing cost of rent. Many letter carriers are making about

Speaker:

$35,000 a year because of the part-time casual work that exists in the post office. It's not

Speaker:

enough money to live on. And we're just asking for our of what we do. And our demands were

Speaker:

also related to the SSD model and the route structuring. Our demands were related to integrating

Speaker:

our RSMC unit, which is not paid hourly, into our urban unit, which is paid hourly. Our demands

Speaker:

were very, very basic. And we were not asking for much from this corporation. And we gave

Speaker:

the corporation those demands in February. The corporation... for a year. Did nothing with

Speaker:

those demands, didn't respond, didn't give us anything. That was until, I think it was roughly

Speaker:

near the end of summer, when they gave us their first global offer. And their first global

Speaker:

offer was like a quarter of our wage increase demand. We're currently, I think I've seen

Speaker:

the numbers that are like 18%. behind inflation. So that means over the last 20 years, our wages

Speaker:

are 18% below inflation. And we're asking for 19%, you know, we're asking for a little bit

Speaker:

extra, but not too much. The corporation offered us, I think 5% was their first offer. They

Speaker:

offered us 5% and they said, oh, by the way, we want to also get rid of all of your job

Speaker:

positions, all of your routes, and we want you all to be casual flex employees. That's not

Speaker:

a tenable solution. You knew about our demands. What a low ball. It was, we were all shocked

Speaker:

to receive this. And not only that, they didn't just submit it to our union to review and present

Speaker:

it to us. They mailed it out to every single of the 55,000 CPW members in a single page

Speaker:

document that essentially said, we're gonna give you 5%. And in return, You give us your

Speaker:

entire collective agreement. Obviously people are upset about this. The union came back and

Speaker:

said, well, we obviously can't accept this. Um, can you give us something better? And I

Speaker:

believe the corporation moved maybe 5.5%, but they also added that, Oh, you can keep your

Speaker:

route. But basically what we're going to do is we're going to assess your route at a length

Speaker:

that is way, way too long to complete. And then every day based off of AI. remove part of that

Speaker:

and give it to somebody else, our casual flex force.

Speaker:

There are like no bosses out there that aren't exploiting AI to fuck us even more. Gee Louise.

Speaker:

That was obviously unacceptable. And it was at this time that the union took their strike

Speaker:

vote and said, look, we can't work in these conditions. We can't work with what you're

Speaker:

giving us. So we have to take a strike vote. Corporation didn't budge on their on their

Speaker:

position after he came back with an resign resounding 96% strike vote When was that I think it was

Speaker:

an October. It's been it's blur. It's been so long So the corporation didn't bid budge on

Speaker:

their position at all We were essentially forced into the position because after you take a

Speaker:

strike vote You have to enact that strike vote or it becomes mute. I think it was like There's

Speaker:

like a legal limit somewhere between 30 and 60 days. And like everyone knows Cup W will

Speaker:

strike, right? So these employers are just they know the fucking liberals will order y'all

Speaker:

back to work eventually. There's so many industries that are just under the full understanding

Speaker:

that the right to strike has been so depleted at this point that they're just not even trying

Speaker:

at the bargaining table. I mean, it works for them once more. That sort of strategy of we

Speaker:

don't have to negotiate with workers. We don't have to give a damn what workers think because

Speaker:

they don't matter. They don't matter to us. They don't matter to this government. They

Speaker:

have no power. And for now, it looks like Canada Post is getting away with that strategy of

Speaker:

bargaining, which is essentially just to tell us to take what they're offering, the scraps

Speaker:

we're offering, and to shut up. You know? Um, and, um, we've budged on our demands. We came

Speaker:

down five, 6% on our wage demands. We offered them that thing they were saying they wanted

Speaker:

to do. We said, fine, you can do it. You can have your, you can, you can take work away

Speaker:

from letter carriers based off of your AI modeling by removing our, our right to 1508, which has

Speaker:

always been the cap on the corporation making routes too long, which was essentially letter

Speaker:

carriers are entitled to do overtime on their own routes. If the corporation is making routes

Speaker:

too long, then it's going to incur them overtime because the letter carriers are going to incur

Speaker:

overtime on a daily basis. But we said to them, look, we'll give up our right to overtime on

Speaker:

our own routes, which is a huge concession. It's a massive concession and it allows the

Speaker:

corporation to make routes really however long they want them to be. and then just piecemeal

Speaker:

out that work. That's bad faith bargaining, right? Seeing you folks move so much on that

Speaker:

and them just basically standing there smug as fuck, saying, yeah, okay, whatever. We just

Speaker:

have to outweigh you. I mean, I don't know if you folks heard before we did, but hearing

Speaker:

that the labor minister was going to refer it to the board and then you folks were ordered

Speaker:

back to work. You must have expected this at some point, right? Five weeks is a long time

Speaker:

to be on strike, and you are essential workers, and the Liberal government behaves like this.

Speaker:

I mean, maybe you weren't expecting this. Am I being presumptuous? Did you think that Canada

Speaker:

Post would make a deal? The corporation's modus operandi for, well, as long as I can remember,

Speaker:

certainly 2012 or 2011 in the Harper government. forced a contract onto us. 2018, when the Liberal

Speaker:

government forced an extension of the Harper government contract onto us, to say that we

Speaker:

weren't expecting back to work legislation would be, it would be naive. Frankly, that's why

Speaker:

I wanted to be a postal worker, since I was like a kid, because I saw how hard they fought

Speaker:

for their rights. I was... Excited to be a part of that. Um, it's the only real union I ever

Speaker:

saw strike to be honest Anyway, um, we were we were expecting back-to-work legislation

Speaker:

But in the liberal government as they often do lied to us every step of the way In order

Speaker:

to bleed us dry They kept us out on the line for almost five weeks and they told us the

Speaker:

whole time We're not gonna order you back to work. We're not gonna order you back to work

Speaker:

and we're not gonna order you back to work because you're obsolete. Nobody cares about the postal

Speaker:

service anymore. So you guys can negotiate what you want and that's how we'll get established.

Speaker:

What became increasingly clear as the postal service remained out on strike was that the

Speaker:

postal service very much is an essential service to the Canadian economy. We keep the wheels

Speaker:

of commerce moving, especially for small businesses, rural communities. in this country and as well

Speaker:

we depress the cost to ship goods. Canada Post offers flat rate shipping across the entire

Speaker:

country. Outside of urban centers to the most remote areas of this country, you pay the same

Speaker:

rate. No other carrier can possibly compete with that. And what became increasingly clear

Speaker:

is that the private companies were gouging. The private companies didn't have the capacity.

Speaker:

Anybody who tried to send anything knows that is true. And we also know that the CEO of Canada

Speaker:

Post is also the CEO of Pyrrolator. He's not the CEO. He is the audit committee chair or

Speaker:

something. Of Pyrrolator. Of Pyrrolator, yeah. Okay, thank you. I've posted both of his email

Speaker:

addresses on my Twitter account if anyone's interested. Yeah, he gets paid over $600,000

Speaker:

to sit as the CEO of Canada Post or somewhere between $580,000 and $620,000. He gets paid

Speaker:

somewhere plus 33% bonuses. Hold on, I got a fun fact because I sat with my family, we were

Speaker:

talking about the strike and managers and supervisors and vice presidents and I don't know where

Speaker:

I got the information, but I was able to find it, how many and what they were each paid.

Speaker:

And wow. upper management is just bloated at Canada Post. I mean, the top dogs get paid

Speaker:

a lot, but then there's a lot of like, a couple steps down getting paid a lot, a lot, a lot,

Speaker:

a lot of money. And it that is incredible when you consider the arguments that they're making.

Speaker:

What was it like for workers five weeks on? I mean, if they're all under the same knowledge

Speaker:

or assumption that eventually they will be ordered back to work, regardless of what Canada Post

Speaker:

is telling them to their face. Was that really hard to keep up people's spirits for five weeks

Speaker:

or were folks still militant and ready to hold the line a little bit longer?

Speaker:

some of the lines still being held. There's a large contingent of postal workers who understand

Speaker:

that this strike is really live or die for our union. And we know that if we don't get a good

Speaker:

contract now, we may never get a good contract. We may never have another negotiated contract.

Speaker:

So there's a large contingent of workers who are militant and want to hold these lines as

Speaker:

long as they can, but it's not because they're well equipped and not because they're not suffering,

Speaker:

because they are. But it's because we've seen literally no other choice. But there is also

Speaker:

a large contingent of people who are scared. They're scared because the charade that the

Speaker:

Liberal government and Canada Post played was effective. And that charade was, we don't have

Speaker:

to negotiate with you or offer you anything. And the whole belief that is now circulated

Speaker:

is that the corporation does not want to, is not able to, and cannot offer us anything better.

Speaker:

then gigification raises less than inflation, cuts to our pension, cuts to our benefits.

Speaker:

That mentality has sunk in, but people don't seem to realize that the only reason the corporation

Speaker:

refused to negotiate for so long was because they knew they didn't have to. They knew Big

Speaker:

Brother was gonna step in and send the little peons back to work, and they would just play,

Speaker:

you know, the good guy. and the whole thing. So yes, it's a mixed bag. It's a mixed bag.

Speaker:

Everyone's furious, to be clear. People are furious. They're furious that we were standing

Speaker:

on those picket lines in the snow, in the rain for five weeks, living off of, if you picketed

Speaker:

it every day, $280 a week from the union. Most people couldn't pick it every day. And it's

Speaker:

not sustainable. You can't live that way. You can't pay rent. You can't make your student

Speaker:

loan payments. You can't make your debt payments you it's uh, it's backbreaking So yeah people

Speaker:

are in both camps people are like we have to and other people less so not I imagine that's

Speaker:

the case with almost any strike, right, but That is um, that was gut-wrenching to actually

Speaker:

hear you say that You may not ever get another negotiated contract again. That hit hard. I

Speaker:

don't think I viewed it that way, but you make the argument and it's kind of hard. I mean,

Speaker:

it's not like it was even this detailed argument. I mean, if you just simply look at the behavior,

Speaker:

even provincially, trying to use the notwithstanding clause to order. workers back. It's like they

Speaker:

are doing everything possible to simply make unions obsolete. Like you can exist, but I

Speaker:

won't allow you to be effective in any way. Now that it's Tuesday and some folks are back

Speaker:

to work, some folks are holding the line. I think a lot of the lines that are being held

Speaker:

are being called community lines, that they're not just Cup W workers. I mean, the whole time

Speaker:

it shouldn't have been just Cup W workers. for the record, even I took my kids to the line

Speaker:

for heaven's sake. But it's, you know, I saw footage coming from Richmond showing a processing

Speaker:

plant there being held by the steelworkers. I saw BCGU and some other usual suspects out

Speaker:

in BC. So it's a mixed bag today. How do you wish... Okay, let's say we had to go through

Speaker:

this band-aid part of ordering y'all back to work because like it was expected. Right? Were

Speaker:

we not preparing for this as... especially the militant members? Like stealing yourself is

Speaker:

one thing, but then making a plan to hold the lines regardless. Yeah, for sure. Obviously,

Speaker:

I would have preferred we'd have a different outcome than we got, which was to, on the face

Speaker:

of it, capitulate to the... illegal back to work orders of the CIRB, the unelected CIRB.

Speaker:

To speak to what some of the militants were doing up until this point, we had an excellent

Speaker:

group of people called Posties Ready to Defy trying to circulate the message that defiance

Speaker:

was going to be necessary at some point in our negotiations. I think that was kind of tried

Speaker:

to be headed off by the liberals who said, no, that's not going to happen. that's not gonna

Speaker:

happen, that's not gonna happen, it's gonna happen, you know? But so our members in Edmonton

Speaker:

managed to get a motion passed through their local in order to hold votes on the picket

Speaker:

line as to whether we would defy, from my understanding those votes passed at 70% that they would defy.

Speaker:

However, their union leadership also refused to go against the NEB. So there was a large...

Speaker:

movement towards defiance and I circulated the memorandums from that line across our own picket

Speaker:

line, preparing people for defiance. But the overwhelming sentiment amongst a lot of people

Speaker:

is that defiance means we get arrested, defiance means we get fines, and a lot of people are

Speaker:

fearful of that. Obviously we saw QP go in 22. continue to hold their lines against the threat

Speaker:

of fines. And I don't believe any fines were ever leveled in the end, but it's hard to convince

Speaker:

people of this, that the workers really ultimately are the ones that have the power and not the

Speaker:

courts. So we've tried to push through our own local and so forth motions to similar effects,

Speaker:

but the engagement. that happens at locals. I don't wanna speak badly of locals in general,

Speaker:

but it's a very bureaucratic procedure. And a lot of workers aren't knowledgeable or prepared

Speaker:

to fight a bureaucratic battle in the way that some long time members of a local might be.

Speaker:

So it's an uphill battle for rank and file workers, but it's not insurmountable. And it's not one

Speaker:

that I'm prepared to say we've lost. We have now a little less than six months until we

Speaker:

are negotiating again, whatever that means. And obviously, you know, we remain, from my

Speaker:

point of view, in a legal strike position up until that point. So now I think the push is

Speaker:

really on to get workers to see that, you know, this is our do or die moment. And the entire

Speaker:

working... class in this country is looking to us for leadership because we saw the longshoremen,

Speaker:

the rail workers, all face the same attacks and get forced into arbitration. But the Liberal

Speaker:

government has left a door open here and hopefully not a door that, you know, is closed by a coming

Speaker:

conservative government, which I don't want to be pessimistic, which is, I don't know,

Speaker:

is that is a really different difference? But anyway, the Liberal government has left a door

Speaker:

here. for postal workers to organize, to build momentum, and to change what has become a defeat

Speaker:

and turn it into a victory. Because where we are at now is not a good position to be in.

Speaker:

We have workers who are desperate. We have workers who have lost faith in their union leadership.

Speaker:

But it should also be clear that those same workers have a tremendous opportunity, as does

Speaker:

the union leadership. which I will not count myself as someone who's lost faith in the union

Speaker:

leadership. But I understand the pragmatic reasons why the decisions that were made were made,

Speaker:

but I will say that we have a door open to us, and all that's left for us now is to walk through

Speaker:

that door. Strike through that door. So just to clarify, I heard you correctly. You consider

Speaker:

yourselves in a legal strike position up until I think it's May? I believe that the union

Speaker:

as of right now has been illegally put into a position to surrender our strike lines by

Speaker:

the CIRB. Don't believe that position is constitutional. not to appeal to liberal constitutionality,

Speaker:

but I don't believe that it is. We took a 95% strike vote. That strike vote continues to

Speaker:

stand. And just because the liberals think that they can walk over the democratic rights of

Speaker:

the workers, it is my point of view that the workers are still very much in a strike position.

Speaker:

All that we need to do is to build the organization necessary to seize that moment. Well, I'm here

Speaker:

for that. I'm reading one of the articles there this morning. It describes, the Canada Post

Speaker:

statement there implies that the union has agreed to some of the points, the order. Is that correct?

Speaker:

Or is that just them playing a PR game? It's my point, again, this is all my point of view.

Speaker:

I haven't seen any indication that the union has agreed to any of what has been said. been

Speaker:

transpired in the CIRB. Um, indeed quite the opposite. Um, what is being circulated amongst

Speaker:

union leadership, not just the national executive board, but amongst other high ranking members

Speaker:

of our union. Don't want to obviously give our names, but my point of view on that is that

Speaker:

a lot of people consider what has happened to us to be a fundamental trampling of our constitutional

Speaker:

rights and Canada Post and the bourgeois meet corporate media. Lie a lot. I feel recall when

Speaker:

our strikes started it was Canada Post was saying we're preparing for a Rotating strike and that's

Speaker:

just what the news Repeated that we're having a rotating strike the news in Canada Post like

Speaker:

to invent narratives that they want to be true So they want it to be true that the Union has

Speaker:

accepted this illegal trampling of our rights Every indication that I have seen is that the

Speaker:

Union has not in any way accepted the illegal trampling of our rights, but understandably

Speaker:

is put into a position where they need to be pragmatic on how they proceed. To say I'm pulling

Speaker:

for you folks is an understatement because you said it yourself that we're looking, I mean,

Speaker:

I'm not even a unionized worker and I'm looking to you folks for leadership and courage and

Speaker:

cup W, I mean. I said it to the folks we visited on the line. I go, you guys are like the union

Speaker:

we point to when we're trying to explain to people the historical value of unions. Like

Speaker:

you enjoy this and this and this because of postal workers striking. And it is it's one

Speaker:

of those kind of unions where if they can't do it, right, if they can't get a negotiated

Speaker:

deal. you know, is that a pivotal moment for the Canadian labor movement? And we keep getting

Speaker:

closer and closer to realizing that there is an actual Canadian labor movement at some of

Speaker:

these community lines being held. I would like to see more of this. This should, this shouldn't

Speaker:

just be a cup W issue. And it sets an awful precedent. I mean, I'll say it so you don't

Speaker:

have to. I mean, the other unions out there need to be prepared to hold some of these lines

Speaker:

and should have already been, should have already been anticipating this. And just like we asked

Speaker:

them to hold the encampments and they promised to, I'm getting very frustrated to see, you

Speaker:

know, this lack of understanding of these moments, these do or die moments that we can't let us,

Speaker:

can't let them pass us by. So I mean, Sarah. Pickett, Captain, Shop Steward, and you know,

Speaker:

a letter carrier. I very much appreciate your work here. I wish today was a different day,

Speaker:

but I think I'm going to sit on some of the things that you said of looking towards the

Speaker:

more hopeful possibilities that could come from this and that it's not over, right? We're just

Speaker:

kind of in a new phase of it. And it was nice to watch people hold. hold a picket line after

Speaker:

being ordered back to work. I mean, I'll just keep replaying some of those videos. Maybe

Speaker:

you could go, I don't know if there's one in Ontario being held, but I think maybe you should

Speaker:

go visit it if it's possible, even if it's virtually. Because yeah, the work matters still, for sure.

Speaker:

Thank you very much, Sarah. Thank you. That is a wrap on another episode of Blueprints

Speaker:

of Disruption. Thank you for joining us. If you'd like to help us continue disrupting the

Speaker:

status quo. Please share our content and if you have the means, consider becoming a patron.

Speaker:

Not only does our support come from the progressive community, so does our content. So reach out

Speaker:

to us and let us know what or who we should be amplifying. So until next time, keep disrupting.

Speaker:

No breaks, no vacation, no 40 hour week. He'd say take it or leave it and throw you out on

Speaker:

the street. Kids working in sweatshops all day long. No one dared to question it. I'd say

Speaker:

it was wrong. Two workers from unions stood up for what's right and gave to us all a much

Speaker:

better life. Unions are the reason there's a minimum wage Weekends, vacations, lunch breaks,

Speaker:

sick days Organized labor made all this come true Don't ever forget what unions did for

Speaker:

you Safe work and conditions, health benefits too Unimportant insurance to help you get through

Speaker:

Bad times and good times when we are as one There is no challenge we can't overcome Cause

Speaker:

unions are the reason there's a minimum wage Weekends, vacations, lunch breaks and sick

Speaker:

days Organized labor made all this come true Don't ever forget what unions did for you

Speaker:

We're in a time that has turned back around. Once again the rich are trying to keep workers

Speaker:

down. Right to work for less, Matches stay right, We deserve more respect.

Speaker:

We're asking Congress to help our pension plan, but it's not a bailout, just a help in hand.

Speaker:

We'll pay it back and pay it forward too, and keep workers working, that's what unions do.

Speaker:

Because unions are the reason there's a minimum wage. Weekends, vacations, lunch breaks, and

Speaker:

sick days.

Speaker:

Don't ever forget, I have you in my stand.

Speaker:

We must never forget what you have done for us.