Speaker:

There is so much out there to get mad about. Social injustices, class warfare, continued

Speaker:

colonization, the act of destruction of our planet by those focused on prophets and not

Speaker:

people. We can find it overwhelming at times. The good news is there are equally as many,

Speaker:

if not more, stories of people coming together and rising up against the forces at play. So

Speaker:

the creators of Blueprints of Disruption have added a new weekly segment, Ravel Rants, where

Speaker:

we will unpack the stories that have us most riled up, share calls to action, and most importantly,

Speaker:

celebrate resistance. Another Catholic school board. has confirmed they won't be flying a

Speaker:

Pride flag during the month of June. This time around it's the York Catholic School Board

Speaker:

in Ontario and this isn't new to them either. Last year was quite contentious in their board

Speaker:

meetings. Parents and allies and really hostile environments were surrounding a lot of these

Speaker:

meetings where it seems like as we've talked about before the anti-LGBTQ movement. if we

Speaker:

can call it that, is really mobilized around school boards right across Canada. And we're

Speaker:

starting to really see the impact. But in this particular case, it's a mix of bigoted parental

Speaker:

pressures. And then, of course, going into the Catholic school board system, which has a long

Speaker:

history of banning pride flags. I have been wanting to just stop public funding for Catholic

Speaker:

school. It's been on my... kind of side agenda, my B agenda, everything else just always seems

Speaker:

so much more pressing. But you know, with the rise of anti LGBT organizing and rhetoric and

Speaker:

policies now, I think the time is to really examine how these school systems feed into

Speaker:

that. This is a funny one for me, right? I graduated high school in 2016. So really not all that

Speaker:

long ago. and I was into York Catholic District School Board. I can't believe how much things

Speaker:

have changed in such little time because I feel like when I was in high school, there was a

Speaker:

lot of really good progress being made. Like when I was a bit younger, like when I was in

Speaker:

elementary school, I remember there was quite a bit of homophobia, pretty common to hear

Speaker:

different homophobic slang being thrown around and... And by the time I got into high school,

Speaker:

that kind of really started to disappear. And I'd say my high school was a place where there

Speaker:

was very little homophobia, both from teachers and from students. And, and friends of mine

Speaker:

actually started what was called the identity squad, which was a club that met on Mondays

Speaker:

where people could, you know, talk about their experiences. It was a safe space for people

Speaker:

of all different identities. And We had a pride flag in there. It was in the drama room. The

Speaker:

drama teacher was the faculty that hosted it. And that was completely okay at the time. There

Speaker:

was no one who tried to shut it down. It was just kind of accepted for what it was, right?

Speaker:

The pride flag, that wasn't a taboo thing. It was normal. There was many, many students who

Speaker:

were out and it was normal. There was nothing strange about it. There was nothing taboo at

Speaker:

all. That doesn't seem to be the case anymore, right? No, I mean, if you've seen footage of

Speaker:

some of the meetings that have happened around the school board decisions. So like, yeah,

Speaker:

the York Catholic School Board is not the first even in Ontario, Peterborough, Northumberland

Speaker:

and Halton region, which are two very large school boards. They made these decisions a

Speaker:

couple of years ago. And you know, the move that's before York. is also unique in that

Speaker:

it's not just the exterior, but it would become against school policy or school board policy

Speaker:

to even have it inside. So even in that affirming safe space created, it would have to be void

Speaker:

of any flags other than Canada, Ontario, I guess York region has a flag apparently, the Vatican

Speaker:

and a school flag. It's so funny that they allow these flags without question as though they're

Speaker:

not each problematic in themselves, except maybe the school flag. I haven't seen, you know.

Speaker:

I'm sure there's some that we could criticize. But generally the nationalism and the Vatican

Speaker:

flag in itself have such rooted history and oppression and controversy, but that's not

Speaker:

what they're targeting at all. Those are green flags, those are good to go, but obviously

Speaker:

the pride flag and there's another one that schools typically fly that we can guess why

Speaker:

the Catholic school system would not want to fly and that is the Every Child Matters.

Speaker:

the guys of it's trying to bring consensus, you know, we're not going to fight over flags

Speaker:

because we're only going to fly the uncontroversial flags. It's so political in itself, right?

Speaker:

We talked about that for almost like the absence of bias, the pretending that there's no bias

Speaker:

in something is so evidently biased. Does that make sense? Yeah. I can understand why Catholic

Speaker:

school boards don't want to do this, but the fact that they have any leeway, and there's

Speaker:

some stories around Catholic- publicly funded hospitals as well that get to kind of pick

Speaker:

and choose whether or not they're going to follow the human rights code of the province. And

Speaker:

in general, it's this religious exceptionalism that we allow to leak in. I mean, I guess as

Speaker:

we talk about this, you'll probably find I'm definitely not happy with organized religion.

Speaker:

I feel like religion is another one of those things that divide the working class into segments

Speaker:

and a lot of them have, you know, a level of superiority. built into them, like their God

Speaker:

is the right God, and so you're on the right side, therefore everyone else is on the wrong

Speaker:

side. And it's generally very polarizing when you look at it from a global perspective. And

Speaker:

I don't think I need to remind anybody of the complications that arise or the ability to

Speaker:

veil issues. Like right now, a lot of people are looking at the issue in Gaza, the siege

Speaker:

on Gaza, as rooted in religion. and we're looking to religion to explain its history and to justify

Speaker:

things and to call certain things off limits. And I generally just have a beef with religion

Speaker:

and the level of toleration that will allow because you look at these Catholic school systems,

Speaker:

I know that they are open to non-Catholics as students. You know, in Ontario, that is like

Speaker:

a third of the students are in Catholic schools. That surprised me. But then when I thought

Speaker:

about it, I actually, the closest schools to me are Catholic. And my kid actually has to

Speaker:

take a bus past the Catholic school to get to his school, even though they're both publicly

Speaker:

funded. Yeah. But you know, as teachers in Ontario for the Catholic school system, they need a

Speaker:

letter from a priest. And that is literally the only job in Ontario that allows you to

Speaker:

discriminate based on religious affiliation. Like, I don't know, maybe you can get it. Maybe

Speaker:

I could convince a priest to write me a letter. I don't know what the letter has to say, but

Speaker:

generally like that. There's exceptions made there and I just don't understand. It's funny

Speaker:

though. It's funny because, um, most of the faculty are not Catholic. Most of the students

Speaker:

are not Catholic. Yeah. I'd say it was very rare for someone to legitimately be Catholic

Speaker:

or for it to be important to them, uh, other students who were there. In fact, you know,

Speaker:

there's a lot, there's, there's a pretty, uh, common joke for people who went through that

Speaker:

system, which is that Catholic school made me an atheist. You know, ironically, I was probably

Speaker:

the most Catholic one out of my friends at the time I was at least. And yeah, it was more

Speaker:

common for there to be Catholic schools and non-Catholic schools. And from my school, for

Speaker:

example, we had people who came from all over. You know, my school was in the south of Aurora,

Speaker:

but we had people from North York, Richmond Hill, Vaughan, Markham, Newmarket. And that's

Speaker:

what makes this a little bit ridiculous, because to an extent, I would understand. I wouldn't.

Speaker:

I wouldn't. accept it but I would understand if you know this was a really religious institution

Speaker:

but it wasn't you know most people skipped the masses that there were and we did all kinds

Speaker:

of things while we were there to kind of I guess rebel against that institution in general.

Speaker:

My parents sent me to catholic school because they thought it was better or whatever. or

Speaker:

you know people hear bad things about the public school system and they assume it doesn't apply

Speaker:

to the catholic school system and It's just not the case and we also had to wear those

Speaker:

god-awful uniforms and people did everything in their power to rebel against those and I

Speaker:

think the uniform is actually quite a symbolic thing to What like it really represents what

Speaker:

catholic school represents which is like that level of authority authoritarianism, right?

Speaker:

That limiting self-expression, individuality, and people in a very important stage of their

Speaker:

life to be expressing individuality, right? It's supposed to be, don't do that. But of

Speaker:

course, when you tell teenagers not to do something, it's oftentimes that that's the thing they

Speaker:

most want to do. Another one of the things that Catholic schools, specifically in Ontario,

Speaker:

have the right to make exceptions to is the sexual education curriculum. And in Ontario,

Speaker:

folks will know that... Premier Four did everything possible to really simplify and make as many

Speaker:

erasures as possible to references to the LGBTQ community, delaying those conversations with

Speaker:

kids. In the end, there was some pullback and they settled on a curriculum. But you know

Speaker:

what? Either way, the Catholic school gets to decide what they will, they've always had a

Speaker:

different curriculum. And it's all based on this. faith-based exceptions. And when you

Speaker:

think about a third of kids in the public school system in Ontario, so we're talking about 600,000

Speaker:

students are taking a sex ed curriculum that's funded by public dollars that is determined

Speaker:

by bishops and not based on what is best for those kids, upholding a certain set of values.

Speaker:

And that's what banning the flag is about. Can you imagine the message that sends to those

Speaker:

public school system kids when they know none of this is about unity? It's about not letting

Speaker:

them fly that pride flag, about erasing them and forcing them back into the closet. You

Speaker:

pair this with the anti-trans policies coming out of the Ministry of Education. And all of

Speaker:

a sudden, these Catholic schools are not safe places for... queer kids at all and the fact

Speaker:

that we fund them. You know, I'm trying to build an argument around defunding the Catholic school

Speaker:

system or really just dismantling it, right? And just having a public school system. And

Speaker:

I stumble across a pamphlet that the Catholic School Trustees Association put together and

Speaker:

it's almost designed specifically to refute common arguments. And I will link it so you

Speaker:

folks can know that I'm probably being generous. The arguments that they put back are so antiquated

Speaker:

and weak. It's basically like because we've always had it and it would be really disappointing

Speaker:

to the Catholic school students and the Catholic community. And historically we had to protect

Speaker:

Catholics because they were minorities and they don't really have any argument for it at all

Speaker:

because they can't say it's to maintain Catholic identity. I mean, they can try to say that.

Speaker:

But from your description and from what we know, there isn't a whole lot of indoctrinating going

Speaker:

on. And that really isn't an excuse for public dollars. No. Surely we can agree that my tax

Speaker:

dollars shouldn't go to maintaining someone else's religious identity. Especially, I don't

Speaker:

feel like that really contributes to the social fabric in a positive way overall. No. And it's

Speaker:

something that, you know, when we look at what's the actual underground difference between Catholic

Speaker:

school and the public school, right? What would really change if you just turned them into

Speaker:

public schools? You could save $1.5 billion every year in Ontario. Yeah, I mean, for one,

Speaker:

public schools already have, you know, religious freedom and like Catholic schools have students

Speaker:

from all different backgrounds, like I said, right? Like it's not just that many of them

Speaker:

were not religious. You had plenty of students who were religious, just not Catholic. And

Speaker:

so for them, being in those schools where you're forced to follow the certain Catholic things,

Speaker:

it's not fair to them, right? It's not that they made the decision to be in these schools

Speaker:

in the first place, right? It's decisions that parents made for them. And it's such a, oh

Speaker:

God, I'm remembering things as we're talking about this now. Like I remember grade 12 religion

Speaker:

class, because we had to take religion every year, right? I got into a big fight with my

Speaker:

religion teacher because they were talking about the morality, it wasn't a religion class, it

Speaker:

was a ethics and morality class where we studied different moral theories, but it was done applying

Speaker:

Catholic religious lens to it. And I remember the topic of sex work came up and I was obviously

Speaker:

defending it and one of the students was saying all of these things about how it was wrong,

Speaker:

it was ethically wrong and uh, and The teacher said something along the lines of how, oh,

Speaker:

it's so nice to see a guy standing up for women's rights to that other student. And I was like,

Speaker:

oh my goodness. I was like, are you fucking kidding me? Clearly haven't, like I got into

Speaker:

it with them and I boycotted the class after that. I walked in on the last day of the semester

Speaker:

with a stack of all of the assignments. Like I had like a stack of papers, handed them in,

Speaker:

passed the class, and I never went back after that because I was not having it. See, that's

Speaker:

troubling though. If you hadn't said anything, this would have been a conversation largely

Speaker:

gone unchecked, the demonized sex workers, which in turn actually is misogyny. And there's a

Speaker:

lot of kids in this system. Yeah. And the thing is, many of them told me privately that they

Speaker:

agreed with me, but they were afraid to kind of voice that in that environment. They didn't

Speaker:

feel safe and comfortable disagreeing with the teacher's stance on this. You know, because

Speaker:

it's one of those things that when you bring it up, it's immediately thrown out by a lot

Speaker:

of people who might even agree with you in principle, but they go to ye olde, you'd have to reopen

Speaker:

the constitution, right? And so, yes. Back in 1867, the British North America Act did enshrine

Speaker:

that the education rights that were held by minorities, I'm going to make sure I get into

Speaker:

this minority word after I'm done, that the minorities at the time of confederation would

Speaker:

be constitutionally protected. No other minorities. This is important. This is an important point.

Speaker:

Not to necessarily talk about the political possibilities of reopening the Constitution.

Speaker:

I mean, here in Ontario right now, Ford would not even entertain this idea. His Minister

Speaker:

of Education spent all his time either in a Catholic school or a private school. So that

Speaker:

issue isn't moving in this province anytime soon. And often it's not a very politically

Speaker:

popular one either. John Tory pretty much almost sunk his hole in... political career suggesting

Speaker:

in the 2007 provincial election that we should perhaps not fund Catholic schools publicly.

Speaker:

And like you hate to agree with them, but that didn't turn out very well. But let's talk about

Speaker:

minority. I know if you're talking about math and statistics, technically the minority is

Speaker:

the fewer number. But when you're talking about socio-economic issues... Minority is a power-based

Speaker:

concept. So there's no fucking way Catholics can get away with calling themselves a minority

Speaker:

back at the time of confederation. Most of the, uh, quote-unquote, founding fathers were Catholic.

Speaker:

And that's why it had to be written in. If you get your shit written into the Constitution,

Speaker:

you're- pretty much guaranteed not to be a minority. If you hold so much sway over the negotiations

Speaker:

that the country, the formation of the country just wouldn't be possible without your agreeing,

Speaker:

you aren't a minority. You are the powerful. You are the majority. And they tried this shit

Speaker:

with the Senate. The Senate was created to secure minority rights. When they said that, they

Speaker:

meant the rich, just because there's fewer in number of them. And so it's framed as though

Speaker:

it's like a necessity, a protector of minorities. And it's not, it's a secure of power. And we

Speaker:

know this because the Catholic Church is so full of shit to begin with. Those folks still

Speaker:

haven't paid reparations that they were supposed to pay in terms of the residential school.

Speaker:

They still have records they refuse to release. This is a garbage institution that shouldn't

Speaker:

be associated with our public school system, if I'm going to be frank. But- The fact that

Speaker:

this relationship continues is because they design themselves to be too big to fail. You

Speaker:

know, other provinces got rid of them. Quebec, even Quebec, Quebec was notoriously the most

Speaker:

Catholic area of Upper and Lower Canada. Okay. Like, and even they got rid of it back in 1997,

Speaker:

although it's to make sure they focused on like French language as opposed to wasting time

Speaker:

on religion. That might have its own issues that we could talk about later. But you know,

Speaker:

Newfoundland, they asked the people in a referendum. The answer was, we don't want to fund that

Speaker:

anymore. We're going to do one school system. So it's not unheard of, but on a material,

Speaker:

once they secured equal funding. So they were funded at a less rate, which went through the

Speaker:

courts or whatever. They secured equal funding back in the eighties and then opened it up

Speaker:

to more people, even though that kind of goes against the idea of maintaining a Catholic

Speaker:

identity. And they kind of balance that. And you wonder why. And I. I think it's largely

Speaker:

to do with the part that it would then become something like what it is now. A third of students

Speaker:

in Ontario are in these systems. They have their own separate school boards. And so another

Speaker:

one of the main arguments that's used to not do this is that at the onset, like any kind

Speaker:

of amalgamation, there's cost, right? Rebranding, shuffling, whatever needs to happen. People

Speaker:

are like, oh, it's going to cost money at first, but it will save money in the long run, but

Speaker:

it's a principal thing. It's like we're maintaining two different school boards that are just another

Speaker:

mechanism to divide the working class. And we shouldn't be paying for that. I don't even

Speaker:

think private schools should exist. Oh, God, no, the private schools are such a... Like,

Speaker:

there was one close by to my school. And I remember when I went there. It's ridiculous. The resources

Speaker:

that they had that we didn't have. was almost offensive. I remember we borrowed their theater

Speaker:

to do a con at one point and it was just, it felt like such a slap in the face. Like why

Speaker:

is it that this group of people over here gets such an advantage over us? But anyways, there's

Speaker:

a certain irony which is that I'm pretty sure that Catholics are probably a minority within

Speaker:

the Catholic school system. Like I don't think that they make up a majority of uh... of either

Speaker:

the student or the faculty. One of the things that you really notice is that, because in

Speaker:

the suburbs, demographics are a little bit different. It was, there wasn't a lot of students of color

Speaker:

in my high school. And you go to the public schools and there were a lot more students

Speaker:

of color, right? So there's also like a certain segregation that happens because of that. And

Speaker:

I don't think that's the benefit of anybody to isolate people. There was almost no Asian

Speaker:

students, for example, in my high school, but my neighborhood had a very large Asian population.

Speaker:

What kind of division does that create even within the communities? I don't think that

Speaker:

that's a good thing. Absolutely not. And whenever you put a religious symbol atop of a public

Speaker:

institution, you immediately are going to make a segment of the population feel unwelcome.

Speaker:

That's just natural because it's almost like you're showing preference to one particular

Speaker:

religion and in public institutions that simply just can't exist. I had somebody ask me if

Speaker:

only Jewish patients could go to Mount Sinai. What does it mean it's a Jewish hospital? I

Speaker:

didn't know that. Olivia Chow said her family was there. How is that possible they're not

Speaker:

Jewish? And so it set this misconception up. that it's actually a segregated system, but

Speaker:

it's a public hospital. And one thing that does create here, because we started talking about

Speaker:

transphobia, homophobia. Those were not primarily my experience in these schools, but what was

Speaker:

my experience? Islamophobia, anti-Asian racism, anti-black racism, communities that were not

Speaker:

represented within these institutions. Because there was plenty of people who were not religious,

Speaker:

but we didn't have a lot of Muslim students. We didn't have a lot of black students. They

Speaker:

might not be there, but they're in an environment where Catholicism is set as the ideal. Yeah.

Speaker:

But so what I'm saying is that just being in these schools, being like in that environment,

Speaker:

created an environment where that kind of racism thrived. Yeah, I bet. That alone. Yeah. And

Speaker:

it's obvious why that would happen. When you look at... the damage versus the pen, there's

Speaker:

just no argument in favor of this. You know, this is, and we look at like the history of

Speaker:

residential schools. We haven't even mentioned that as much, right? And the forced Catholic

Speaker:

education within residential schools, right? We can see the history here. You think that's

Speaker:

gonna be taught in a Catholic school? You think they were teaching about those things in a

Speaker:

Catholic school? No, they didn't teach any dark. aspects of Catholic history at all. I went

Speaker:

through, like I said, I took every history class possible and they're burying those sins as

Speaker:

deep as they can. Not just that, but it's naive to assume that they have drastically changed

Speaker:

the model in which they run schools. I know they might not have graveyards in the back

Speaker:

of their Catholic schools, but just the ideology that comes from the Catholic institution that

Speaker:

attempts to indoctrinate people. It intends to teach people that Catholicism is the one

Speaker:

and only way. And that is very similar to a lot of religions, but that was always the purpose

Speaker:

of Catholic schools and especially the residential schools. It was to mold those indigenous children

Speaker:

into what they considered the ideal. And I imagine that although they've moved beyond the more

Speaker:

atrocious ways of doing that, the idea is still there. The idea is still that there is a set

Speaker:

of values determined by one set of religion. And we've really just, we think we've rejected

Speaker:

that. I mean, we can point to a lot of examples where Canada still has really kind of Christian

Speaker:

rooted policy decisions and has to deal with that. But generally, if you ask people, we

Speaker:

believe in the separation of church and state. And the fact that this has been able to maintain

Speaker:

itself in so many provinces to me is a little unusual, but I think indicative of the power

Speaker:

that Catholics hold in politics, because there's just there's really not a whole lot of rationale

Speaker:

behind them. You talked about homophobia and Islamophobia. One of the troubling aspects

Speaker:

that I've witnessed kind of anecdotally of the Catholic school system is I have a young relative.

Speaker:

And at some point in a conversation, the pride flag came up and we were talking about it.

Speaker:

We were describing it and I could tell she was very puzzled by the conversation. So I asked

Speaker:

her, I believe she was 10, 11. Do you know what this is? And she had no idea. She had no idea.

Speaker:

And so for me, that was really upsetting. I know that sounds really young, but in today's

Speaker:

world, surely 11. was too old in my mind for her to have never really been experienced to

Speaker:

pride. Not just the flag. What it does is it asks questions because the reason... Well,

Speaker:

I've had this conversation with my kids many times, but it becomes a conversation in June.

Speaker:

When the flag is on the pole, it may seem so trivial, but when that flag is on the pole,

Speaker:

kids ask their parents. So maybe it's not in their curriculum. Maybe it's not being taught

Speaker:

well enough in school tolerance and different... folks' identities and all of that. But if it's

Speaker:

never, if it's always hidden away, then that conversation is surely much less likely to

Speaker:

happen. And then the tolerance level of straight students is also impacted, right? It's not

Speaker:

just alienating LGBTQ youth and anybody else who feels like their flag won't be flown because

Speaker:

of bigotry, but it's the students that need exposure the most too, right? The ones that

Speaker:

are possibly causing the bullying. because they've not properly had these conversations at home.

Speaker:

And there's no way to kind of undo that if you're always going to allow religions to make exceptions

Speaker:

in those environments. Yeah, I think it's about time we reopen this conversation, although

Speaker:

it's hard to prioritize it amongst all of the other things that are happening. But I don't

Speaker:

think LGBTQ parents and queer students perhaps would agree, right? It probably feels quite

Speaker:

pressing. in these times that they not roll back all the work that's been done. Because

Speaker:

that's how it feels, right? It's like we got to a certain, we talked about this before,

Speaker:

like we got to a certain point where I felt like queer rights were a given, you know, and

Speaker:

that's maybe naive of me, but it felt like it got to a point where, you know, a lot of derogatory

Speaker:

terms, like people know not to use them and that there's an acceptance level and it seems

Speaker:

like it's just rolling back. So to me, that's scary. Yeah. in a really short period of time

Speaker:

too. Like it felt like a lot of good progress was made and then we've gone so far back. And

Speaker:

I really feel for the students who are having to go through that right now, right? Because

Speaker:

I've said it before, but I think one of the most vulnerable groups of people is high school

Speaker:

students. Like when people are in that age range, right? Because you lack a lot of autonomy,

Speaker:

but you're like the... the amount of autonomy you have versus the amount of autonomy that

Speaker:

you should have for someone of that cognitive ability of, you know, like of development.

Speaker:

You're making all of these decisions about your life, you know, what you're going to do is

Speaker:

like a really fundamental period in your life and yet other people have such control over

Speaker:

you, whether it's your parents, whether or not it's your educational institute and the ability

Speaker:

to escape from harmful environments. It's quite difficult, lack of financial means to do so,

Speaker:

lack of, well, just the damage that it can do to your future. I think it's really important

Speaker:

to do everything we can to help protect people who are in those situations. And, you know,

Speaker:

I think there was no exception. Like the amount of people I knew, the amount of friends I had,

Speaker:

or just stories I had heard of people who were living through extremely abusive situations

Speaker:

at that age, you know, seeing them now. eight years removed, many of them still processing

Speaker:

that trauma, still dealing with the consequences of what they were forced to live through. It

Speaker:

seems like, oh, you know, flag this or not in these, you know, just graduate and then you

Speaker:

can do whatever you want. It's not like that. You know, these are formative years. You carry

Speaker:

that shit with you. It's important to do everything possible to make it easier for them. It's important

Speaker:

to note here that Suicide takes a lot of LGBTQ youth from us. And the people making these

Speaker:

decisions, they know that. And so to think that they wouldn't do everything within their possibility

Speaker:

to help the youth who demographically speaking and statistically speaking are likely in the

Speaker:

same percentage as public schools, as public English schools, what do we call them? Secular

Speaker:

schools. because they're all public schools. But it doesn't make sense to me too that people

Speaker:

go into these trustees positions, these school trustee positions and don't have students'

Speaker:

best interests in mind. Because surely it's not harming one straight student to put that

Speaker:

flag up. We know that it doesn't. Their main concern is a faith-based model of decision-making

Speaker:

or protecting the Catholic school system or appeasing. really angry parents that have no

Speaker:

vested interest in that flag going up or down in reality. And that's a real danger that's

Speaker:

kind of repeating itself. We interviewed on our episode, Community Defenses, a group that

Speaker:

does a lot of work, but much of it is focused on countering all of this mobilization around

Speaker:

the school systems. And so organizing around these trustee positions in the school board.

Speaker:

is perhaps a mechanism of disruption that folks can attempt to weigh in on this subject. Yeah,

Speaker:

I briefly mentioned it before, but again, like we do this with hospitals, right? There's hospitals

Speaker:

out there that are gonna refuse to do MADE. They're refusing to perform abortions. They're

Speaker:

forcing patients that are often terminally ill in the last days, hours to... go down an elevator,

Speaker:

go down the street and go into a different facility or worse, go across the city to try to get

Speaker:

it or across the province. And they're able to do that not based on the Hippocratic oath

Speaker:

or the other values rooted in the medical system, well, the ones that they're supposed to have.

Speaker:

And BC now is going as far as building separate facilities near Catholic hospitals that are

Speaker:

publicly funded. because they're refusing to perform procedures, refusing to do the assisted

Speaker:

deaths in the province. And I think at this point in time, when you've got governments

Speaker:

pretending to like be penny pinchers and trying to implement the most efficient healthcare,

Speaker:

all of this, you know, falls under that, right? There's really, the only excuse would be to

Speaker:

maintain some sort of supremacy here that only one religion gets a school system. that no

Speaker:

one's willing to do anything about. If you were to reverse, if you were to switch out the names

Speaker:

here for a second and imagine that there was a Muslim school system that was as funded and

Speaker:

as prominent and widespread as a Catholic school system, I think we all know what would happen.

Speaker:

There's no way it would still be funded. You know, my argument isn't here that we should

Speaker:

fund, we should segregate people and fund a bunch of different specific school systems.

Speaker:

No, my argument is especially when we're talking about people who are still figuring out what

Speaker:

they believe, what you know, what they value out of life uh independent from whatever their

Speaker:

parents raised them to be because you know times change people have the right to make their

Speaker:

own decisions. We shouldn't be have, we shouldn't be forcing people into religious schools at

Speaker:

all. It should all be public schools freedom of religion and let kids figure out what they

Speaker:

value and what's important to them. Don't try and segregate people off and hope that they

Speaker:

end up believing whatever their parents believed, right? Life doesn't work that way. No way,

Speaker:

we need kids thinking like they're one, right? Like that global singular identity is the ideal

Speaker:

for me. So anything that detracts from that is a detriment to that. that global revolution.

Speaker:

Okay, well, you know what? I want a socialist school system then. Let's just... That is your

Speaker:

public school system, right? One system, no private schools, because then you got your

Speaker:

leches out there that go to St. Mike's. They get better protected during COVID. They get

Speaker:

a better education, and their parents and their families don't give a shit about a well-funded

Speaker:

public school system. So once you have a wealth under public school system, obviously, then

Speaker:

you have to seize power. And then any changes you make to that school system to better the

Speaker:

social fabric, to better the experience of kids, you don't have to do it 10 times over and then

Speaker:

just have someone put down their UNO card and be like, guess what? We're religious, we don't

Speaker:

have to do it. Well, let's just take this to the extremes, I say. Let's have... a hundred

Speaker:

different school systems with different identities and see where we all end up after that. I'm

Speaker:

sure we'll have a healthier society out of it, right? I'm sure it'll be great. I look forward

Speaker:

to the... I mean, we can't even have just a socialist school system, though we've got to

Speaker:

have different schools of thoughts, right? You'll have your Marxist You know, let's separate

Speaker:

it out, see where we end up. We'll all be better for it, right? Let's, anyone who doesn't think

Speaker:

like us should be somewhere else, right? Well, you can be my minister of education. Oh God.

Speaker:

That is a wrap on another episode of Blueprints of Disruption. Thank you for joining us. Also,

Speaker:

a very big thank you to the producer of our show, Santiago Helu-Quintero. Blueprints of

Speaker:

Disruption is an independent production operated cooperatively. You can follow us on Twitter

Speaker:

at BPofDisruption. If you'd like to help us continue disrupting the status quo, please

Speaker:

share our content and if you have the means, consider becoming a patron. Not only does our

Speaker:

support come from the progressive community, so does our content. So reach out to us and

Speaker:

let us know what or who we should be amplifying. So until next time, keep disrupting.