1 00:00:00,136 --> 00:00:04,292 Today's exciting episode is something hot off the presses. 2 00:00:04,581 --> 00:00:06,688 If you can consider a U. 3 00:00:06,688 --> 00:00:06,808 S. 4 00:00:06,818 --> 00:00:10,974 Supreme Court decision about copyright infringement hot, but we're going with it. 5 00:00:11,254 --> 00:00:15,981 So recently, as I'm recording this in May, 2024, the U. 6 00:00:15,981 --> 00:00:16,101 S. 7 00:00:16,101 --> 00:00:21,626 Supreme Court settled a conflict among federal courts of appeal, that 8 00:00:21,666 --> 00:00:25,946 whether or not a copyright owner can recover damages for infringements 9 00:00:26,191 --> 00:00:30,809 that occurred more than three years before commencement of the lawsuit. 10 00:00:30,978 --> 00:00:35,334 So the second circuit, uh, said that the copyright plaintiff would be limited 11 00:00:35,493 --> 00:00:39,548 to damages that are only three years. 12 00:00:39,676 --> 00:00:41,801 look back from the filing of the complaint. 13 00:00:41,801 --> 00:00:45,611 So they can't look at damages for infringements that occurred before 14 00:00:45,736 --> 00:00:51,436 three years back from the filing of the complaint, whereas the 9th and 11th 15 00:00:51,576 --> 00:00:55,386 circuits disagreed and said it wasn't limited to that three year look back. 16 00:00:55,594 --> 00:01:01,299 And so in a 6 3 decision, Authored by Justin Kagan, the Supreme Court 17 00:01:01,349 --> 00:01:07,149 affirmed the 11th circuit's ruling and held that the Copyright Act entitles a 18 00:01:07,159 --> 00:01:12,261 copyright owner to recover money damages flowing from a timely infringement 19 00:01:12,261 --> 00:01:17,158 claim even if the infringement at issue occurred more than three years 20 00:01:17,158 --> 00:01:19,028 before the initiation of the suit. 21 00:01:19,199 --> 00:01:20,891 There are of course some nuances to that. 22 00:01:21,029 --> 00:01:25,204 But generally, we want to look, it is a win because we don't want 23 00:01:25,214 --> 00:01:29,491 to have different results just because, you know, it is federal law. 24 00:01:29,491 --> 00:01:32,321 So it should apply equally all over the country. 25 00:01:32,474 --> 00:01:35,801 They don't want to have different results about what damages are available to us. 26 00:01:35,801 --> 00:01:39,888 If you file on the 9th circuit or the 11th circuit versus filing the 2nd circuit. 27 00:01:40,081 --> 00:01:40,808 So that's great. 28 00:01:40,974 --> 00:01:45,664 So all that to say that, let's take this moment to review. 29 00:01:45,814 --> 00:01:48,238 Damages for copyright infringement. 30 00:01:48,258 --> 00:01:50,228 And so we're going to have a little refresher here. 31 00:01:50,401 --> 00:01:53,744 It may even be the deepest dive into damages that I've done. 32 00:01:53,744 --> 00:01:58,121 I know I've done some light every view of the damages for copyright infringement. 33 00:01:58,311 --> 00:01:59,851 So let's go a little bit deeper today. 34 00:02:00,044 --> 00:02:03,674 So first, you know, what damages are available? 35 00:02:03,858 --> 00:02:09,764 Under the US copyright law, so it provides that the infringer of a 36 00:02:09,804 --> 00:02:15,531 copyright is liable for either the copyright owners actual damages, plus 37 00:02:15,611 --> 00:02:21,798 additional profits of the infringer, or they can get statutory damages. 38 00:02:22,058 --> 00:02:24,704 It's actual damages or statutory damage. 39 00:02:24,714 --> 00:02:26,124 You cannot do both. 40 00:02:26,374 --> 00:02:29,804 So let's talk about actual damages and profits first. 41 00:02:29,948 --> 00:02:34,548 So as the name suggests, actual damages refers to the compensation 42 00:02:34,578 --> 00:02:39,724 awarded to a copyright owner based on the actual harm that the owner 43 00:02:39,944 --> 00:02:41,904 suffers from the infringement. 44 00:02:42,068 --> 00:02:45,254 So they can be calculated as the real financial loss. 45 00:02:45,781 --> 00:02:51,781 So maybe lost profits from sales that didn't occur because of the infringement. 46 00:02:51,948 --> 00:02:56,784 Also, they have access to the profits made by the infringer. 47 00:02:56,971 --> 00:03:00,241 one might be more like maybe the infringer sold it for more than 48 00:03:00,241 --> 00:03:03,511 you could have sold it for, meaning you should have raised your prices. 49 00:03:03,736 --> 00:03:06,396 if your loss profits are higher, then go after that. 50 00:03:06,396 --> 00:03:09,356 If their profits are higher than you go after that. 51 00:03:09,539 --> 00:03:14,699 and then, so maybe it's a combination of the two, maybe, they, create a derivative 52 00:03:14,709 --> 00:03:16,716 that cause created, more profits. 53 00:03:16,913 --> 00:03:20,393 So you can get your loss sales and, profits from the derivative. 54 00:03:20,566 --> 00:03:25,783 And so it's, you know, you can't double dip, but you can, aggregate your losses 55 00:03:25,943 --> 00:03:28,783 and the profits of the infringer. 56 00:03:28,993 --> 00:03:34,439 So the complication here is, on proving actual damages is that you do need to 57 00:03:34,439 --> 00:03:37,169 have to prove evidence of an actual loss. 58 00:03:37,483 --> 00:03:41,669 So you need to have be keeping, you know, sales records, financial statements, 59 00:03:41,739 --> 00:03:46,509 anything that would show that decrease in revenue that is attributable. 60 00:03:46,599 --> 00:03:47,931 to the infringement. 61 00:03:48,088 --> 00:03:52,058 So, if your sale is just having to go down because, nobody wants it 62 00:03:52,108 --> 00:03:56,234 anymore, it's not attributable to the infringement, that would not be, an 63 00:03:56,334 --> 00:03:59,134 actual damage due to the infringement. 64 00:03:59,328 --> 00:04:02,594 So you do need to have, some records that So you can make that 65 00:04:02,594 --> 00:04:07,161 connection, which makes it a little more complex than statutory damages, 66 00:04:07,161 --> 00:04:08,361 which we'll talk about in a minute. 67 00:04:08,491 --> 00:04:13,118 for when we're looking at the infringer's profits, that's a little easier to prove. 68 00:04:13,138 --> 00:04:16,961 All you have to do is show the infringer's gross revenue. 69 00:04:17,123 --> 00:04:18,829 That's considered their profits. 70 00:04:18,869 --> 00:04:22,059 They can, say, well, I also have these expenses too. 71 00:04:22,059 --> 00:04:26,346 So this is my profit, but obviously that's a little bit easier to prove, 72 00:04:26,519 --> 00:04:29,843 they have clearly been selling it and have them and had some gross 73 00:04:29,863 --> 00:04:32,096 revenue based on the infringement. 74 00:04:32,293 --> 00:04:32,553 All right. 75 00:04:32,553 --> 00:04:37,466 So that's your actual profits, and, actual damages and infringers 76 00:04:37,556 --> 00:04:40,026 profits that you can get as damages. 77 00:04:40,149 --> 00:04:40,459 Okay. 78 00:04:40,489 --> 00:04:44,706 The next category are statutory damages, and there are some 79 00:04:44,736 --> 00:04:47,216 eligibility requirements, which we'll talk about in a second. 80 00:04:47,366 --> 00:04:53,947 But if eligible, you can elect the copyright owner can elect to recover 81 00:04:53,967 --> 00:04:58,983 instead of actual damages and profits an award of statutory damages. 82 00:04:59,132 --> 00:05:03,900 So these are the damages that the court can award for copyright infringement, 83 00:05:04,029 --> 00:05:09,640 which do not require the copyright owner to prove actual financial 84 00:05:09,737 --> 00:05:14,057 Loss, and this is really helpful if it is hard to prove your losses. 85 00:05:14,057 --> 00:05:18,980 Maybe you can't prove that direct relationship between the infringement 86 00:05:19,113 --> 00:05:23,683 and a decrease in sales, or maybe you haven't really had any sales yet. 87 00:05:23,817 --> 00:05:28,010 or there's, not enough, of, profits to, or damage to really 88 00:05:28,050 --> 00:05:30,963 make sense to pursue legal action. 89 00:05:31,132 --> 00:05:35,264 But, if you have access to statutory damages, that can make a big difference. 90 00:05:35,507 --> 00:05:38,427 So what are the eligibility requirements for statutory damages? 91 00:05:38,635 --> 00:05:38,781 It. 92 00:05:38,985 --> 00:05:43,544 requires timely registration of the work with the U. 93 00:05:43,544 --> 00:05:43,654 S. 94 00:05:43,694 --> 00:05:44,644 Copyright Office. 95 00:05:44,917 --> 00:05:50,944 So to qualify for statutory damages, you must have registered the copyright either 96 00:05:50,974 --> 00:05:57,811 before the infringement began or within three months of first publishing the work. 97 00:05:58,007 --> 00:06:01,497 So publishing means when you made it available to the public. 98 00:06:01,731 --> 00:06:05,676 So when it's still like hanging out in your computer, that's not publishing. 99 00:06:05,819 --> 00:06:07,976 That's creation, which is a different measure. 100 00:06:08,082 --> 00:06:12,312 for statutory damages, it's within three months of first publishing the work. 101 00:06:12,562 --> 00:06:18,886 So statutory damages can range, from 750 to 30, 000. 102 00:06:18,886 --> 00:06:22,609 1, 000 per work as determined by the court. 103 00:06:22,609 --> 00:06:24,779 We'll talk about what those variables are. 104 00:06:24,937 --> 00:06:30,639 And if there is a willful infringement, the statutories can be increased up 105 00:06:30,639 --> 00:06:38,652 to 150, 000 Per work, so obviously, talking about the cost of litigation 106 00:06:38,652 --> 00:06:42,099 and whether or not it's worth it to pursue an infringement claim. 107 00:06:42,239 --> 00:06:45,762 This can make a big difference, especially if you haven't really 108 00:06:45,762 --> 00:06:47,692 made any profits from your work yet. 109 00:06:47,842 --> 00:06:49,982 Or the profits have been relatively low. 110 00:06:50,169 --> 00:06:53,706 If you have access to statutory damages, one, you don't have 111 00:06:53,706 --> 00:06:55,356 to prove your actual loss. 112 00:06:55,416 --> 00:06:58,566 And two, it makes it a much simpler case to prove. 113 00:06:58,712 --> 00:07:03,329 Therefore, keeping, attorneys fees, lower than if you have to prove 114 00:07:03,329 --> 00:07:04,469 all these, all the other stuff. 115 00:07:04,632 --> 00:07:07,319 So Will the court find that the infringement is willful? 116 00:07:07,489 --> 00:07:14,172 So it can, if it, can show that the infringer knew what they were doing 117 00:07:14,172 --> 00:07:18,989 was wrong, this could be the case where, you sent a cease and desist 118 00:07:19,029 --> 00:07:23,496 letter and instead of, stopping the infringement, they just changed their 119 00:07:23,496 --> 00:07:26,086 URL or did something to try to hide. 120 00:07:26,086 --> 00:07:28,242 And so they, okay, I'll shut down that website and. 121 00:07:28,569 --> 00:07:29,419 Open up another one. 122 00:07:29,439 --> 00:07:33,886 Obviously, that is a very willful infringement versus someone who, as 123 00:07:33,886 --> 00:07:37,066 soon as they get caught, they take it down, as you know, because I 124 00:07:37,214 --> 00:07:40,556 definitely preach this all the time and infringement is an infringement. 125 00:07:40,576 --> 00:07:44,316 It doesn't matter if you didn't realize you couldn't use it or, oh, 126 00:07:44,316 --> 00:07:46,002 I thought it was on the Internet. 127 00:07:46,012 --> 00:07:51,072 So it was free or, oh, Innocent or not, that will depend where in the 128 00:07:51,072 --> 00:07:55,936 spectrum of damages falls, but not whether or not it is an infringement. 129 00:07:56,099 --> 00:08:00,429 If you take somebody else's copyrighted work without permission and use 130 00:08:00,429 --> 00:08:03,929 it without their permission, it is infringement and the only issue is 131 00:08:03,999 --> 00:08:07,549 where in the scale of damages it falls. 132 00:08:07,859 --> 00:08:11,156 So let's talk about calculating the damages, you know, 133 00:08:11,196 --> 00:08:13,379 how much in that spectrum. 134 00:08:13,379 --> 00:08:16,109 It's a pretty big spectrum where the damages fall. 135 00:08:16,241 --> 00:08:20,331 So it varies and it will depend on the seriousness of the infringing 136 00:08:20,401 --> 00:08:24,777 act and also depend on the financial worth of the infringer. 137 00:08:24,974 --> 00:08:26,704 So the court is going to determine this. 138 00:08:27,241 --> 00:08:27,791 So, um. 139 00:08:27,839 --> 00:08:31,811 Innocent infringements again, still infringement, but if it really, if 140 00:08:31,811 --> 00:08:35,757 the court binds and the infringer can prove that it really was innocent, 141 00:08:36,007 --> 00:08:39,047 I don't even know what this would be, honestly, they can reduce 142 00:08:39,047 --> 00:08:42,001 it to as little as 200 per work. 143 00:08:42,231 --> 00:08:47,694 so maybe an innocent infringement might be, I had a license. 144 00:08:48,012 --> 00:08:48,812 let's use this one. 145 00:08:48,936 --> 00:08:52,406 like the stock photo place and you get a license for it and your 146 00:08:52,406 --> 00:08:54,976 license is to use it on your website. 147 00:08:55,186 --> 00:08:58,739 so you have someone who does your email list or something. 148 00:08:58,739 --> 00:09:00,674 And, And they're like, oh, I like this image. 149 00:09:00,684 --> 00:09:04,844 And so, yeah, you have a license for all the images on your website and they put 150 00:09:04,844 --> 00:09:09,191 it in your newsletter and your license doesn't include use in the newsletter. 151 00:09:09,289 --> 00:09:11,799 maybe that might be considered an innocent infringement. 152 00:09:11,799 --> 00:09:13,629 Again, I don't, know how it becomes innocent. 153 00:09:13,639 --> 00:09:14,029 I mean. 154 00:09:14,129 --> 00:09:18,186 we should know we should all know better that we can't use a works that we don't 155 00:09:18,256 --> 00:09:19,926 own without a license or permission. 156 00:09:20,099 --> 00:09:22,159 So, let's just use that 1 as a sample. 157 00:09:22,366 --> 00:09:24,762 So, you thought you had a license for it. 158 00:09:24,952 --> 00:09:27,546 It was reasonable to believe that if you can put it on your 159 00:09:27,546 --> 00:09:30,616 website, you can put it in your newsletter, but you actually can't. 160 00:09:30,809 --> 00:09:32,726 So, let's, call that innocent infringement. 161 00:09:33,082 --> 00:09:36,992 And on the other hand, if, it was something that was willful, like 162 00:09:36,992 --> 00:09:40,162 our example, you got that cease and desist, but instead you tried to, 163 00:09:40,319 --> 00:09:44,409 hide your use instead of, stopping the use, and the court can find as much 164 00:09:44,409 --> 00:09:47,761 as 000, penalty, damages per work. 165 00:09:47,931 --> 00:09:49,691 that really isn't a penalty, right? 166 00:09:49,691 --> 00:09:53,654 I mean, that is intended to punish the infringer, in that circumstance. 167 00:09:54,027 --> 00:09:58,751 and so again, that spectrum will depend on the circumstances 168 00:09:58,892 --> 00:10:01,212 now for an actual calculation. 169 00:10:01,222 --> 00:10:07,776 I'm going to use the example of a website that has used 3 copyrighted photos. 170 00:10:07,977 --> 00:10:12,727 All from the same photographer, maybe all from the same, source. 171 00:10:12,897 --> 00:10:19,594 And so 3 photographs from the same source used on 1 website without permission. 172 00:10:19,767 --> 00:10:27,869 And so, if my range of, statutory damages is 750 to 30, 000. 173 00:10:27,909 --> 00:10:30,776 Let's just use 10, 000 per photo. 174 00:10:30,946 --> 00:10:32,616 It's a lot, but let's just use it anyway. 175 00:10:32,869 --> 00:10:34,969 so what would the damages be? 176 00:10:35,009 --> 00:10:37,639 I've got one website from one source. 177 00:10:38,067 --> 00:10:39,117 three photographs. 178 00:10:39,537 --> 00:10:46,004 So damages are calculated per work, not per active infringement. 179 00:10:46,184 --> 00:10:48,101 There was only one active infringement. 180 00:10:48,101 --> 00:10:52,197 I took these photographs, I put them on my website, but it was three works, 181 00:10:52,207 --> 00:10:54,947 three separate copyrighted photographs. 182 00:10:55,371 --> 00:10:57,721 So the damages are per work. 183 00:10:57,721 --> 00:11:06,806 So at 10, 000 per Work that would be a 30, 000, statutory damages claim for that. 184 00:11:07,002 --> 00:11:12,766 so every song, every book, every photograph, that would be a 185 00:11:13,226 --> 00:11:16,056 separate work, anything that's a separate work is registered under 186 00:11:16,056 --> 00:11:19,929 the copyright office is eligible for the separate statutory damage. 187 00:11:20,099 --> 00:11:22,669 I don't know, it should be a good thing. 188 00:11:22,892 --> 00:11:24,022 will look into this. 189 00:11:24,022 --> 00:11:25,906 Like, let's say, I take. 190 00:11:25,994 --> 00:11:26,687 One. 191 00:11:26,697 --> 00:11:27,887 No, I know the answer to this. 192 00:11:28,091 --> 00:11:32,374 So if I take, one paragraph from a book, if I take three paragraphs 193 00:11:32,374 --> 00:11:34,397 from a book, that is still one work. 194 00:11:34,457 --> 00:11:35,607 That is not three works. 195 00:11:35,762 --> 00:11:39,876 All right, so as you can see, that's a pretty heavy club to 196 00:11:39,876 --> 00:11:44,572 wield as a copyright owner if you have access to statutory damages. 197 00:11:44,774 --> 00:11:47,036 Now, it doesn't mean you're going to get 10, 000 for photo, 198 00:11:47,206 --> 00:11:48,912 again, that's pretty high. 199 00:11:49,089 --> 00:11:53,409 let's say though, somebody uses that photograph in advertising that 200 00:11:53,419 --> 00:11:55,352 they know, you don't get to use. 201 00:11:55,736 --> 00:11:57,561 Photographs for free and advertising. 202 00:11:57,712 --> 00:12:01,926 that's going to be a bigger number than if you use it on your website that, 203 00:12:02,006 --> 00:12:03,922 , frankly, you know, nobody fits in. 204 00:12:04,279 --> 00:12:09,792 so it'll be in there, but that's the continuum of damages that are available, 205 00:12:10,072 --> 00:12:15,409 for, minor infringements, I'll call it versus major or willful infringements. 206 00:12:15,750 --> 00:12:18,596 So, obviously, when you have statutory damages, it's in everybody's 207 00:12:18,596 --> 00:12:20,446 interest to just settle out of court. 208 00:12:20,647 --> 00:12:22,559 I mean, nobody wants to you're going to lose. 209 00:12:22,559 --> 00:12:26,345 I mean, you infringed and it's eligible for statutory damages, 210 00:12:26,563 --> 00:12:27,430 why would you go to court? 211 00:12:27,596 --> 00:12:30,679 but you do want to have that leverage to keep it out of court. 212 00:12:30,882 --> 00:12:34,916 as I was writing this script, and it's hard to imagine I use a script 213 00:12:34,966 --> 00:12:38,546 because I always deviate from it, but I do start with a script. 214 00:12:38,586 --> 00:12:41,619 And I was thinking about the fact that this is what I hear a lot. 215 00:12:41,629 --> 00:12:45,997 Like, how do I, get as much as possible On to one copyright 216 00:12:45,997 --> 00:12:49,863 registration because there are fees involved with registering copyrights. 217 00:12:49,863 --> 00:12:53,538 They're not very high, frankly, but there is some work involved and 218 00:12:53,538 --> 00:12:56,303 some resources involved register something in the copyright office. 219 00:12:56,487 --> 00:13:02,690 And the idea is to get, compilation or entire course or a series on 220 00:13:02,780 --> 00:13:05,020 to one copyright registration. 221 00:13:05,145 --> 00:13:10,793 But what I was thinking is, if your statutory damages are calculated 222 00:13:10,863 --> 00:13:17,950 per work, does it make sense just as a kind of prophylactic against 223 00:13:18,000 --> 00:13:22,883 copyright infringement to have each, like, let's say, module of a course 224 00:13:23,040 --> 00:13:25,830 registered as a separate work. 225 00:13:25,930 --> 00:13:30,052 you don't lose Protection that way, you have more works. 226 00:13:30,602 --> 00:13:35,768 So if I have, let's say I have a 10 module course and it is sold together, like 227 00:13:35,788 --> 00:13:38,708 you cannot buy the courses individually. 228 00:13:38,708 --> 00:13:40,672 You can only buy them together. 229 00:13:40,835 --> 00:13:45,498 So it would qualify as a single work for registration purposes. 230 00:13:45,828 --> 00:13:49,148 You don't have to register each of let's say there's 10 modules. 231 00:13:49,488 --> 00:13:52,905 You can register them together because they're only available as one work. 232 00:13:53,060 --> 00:13:53,890 so that would be one work. 233 00:13:53,890 --> 00:13:57,417 Somebody steals one or more portions of my course. 234 00:13:57,637 --> 00:14:00,013 It's one work that's been infringed. 235 00:14:00,013 --> 00:14:04,517 And so that would be your statutory damages for one work versus if I have 236 00:14:04,547 --> 00:14:09,667 registered each module separately, even though you can only buy them together, 237 00:14:09,810 --> 00:14:11,860 but I've registered them separately. 238 00:14:12,017 --> 00:14:15,509 And therefore each module is a separate work. 239 00:14:15,640 --> 00:14:21,620 That same infringement of my module course is now an 240 00:14:21,620 --> 00:14:25,030 infringement of 10 separate works. 241 00:14:25,464 --> 00:14:32,177 So this is just to remind you, statutory damages can be very high, and even for 242 00:14:32,177 --> 00:14:34,784 innocent uses, as a copyright owner. 243 00:14:35,087 --> 00:14:35,872 Hey, great. 244 00:14:35,872 --> 00:14:37,962 You have access to these statutory damages. 245 00:14:38,177 --> 00:14:43,552 However, on the other side of that, if you are the infringer, even if you are 246 00:14:43,552 --> 00:14:49,162 an innocent infringer or an accidental infringer or an ignorant infringer, 247 00:14:49,329 --> 00:14:52,469 because you don't know better, although you should, if you're listening to this 248 00:14:52,489 --> 00:14:57,174 podcast, want to make sure we're always getting permission to use Anything that 249 00:14:57,174 --> 00:15:03,721 you don't own, anything that falls within, copyright protection, if you don't own it, 250 00:15:03,761 --> 00:15:05,591 make sure you have permission to use it. 251 00:15:05,772 --> 00:15:10,951 I have created a number of resources to make sure that you understand what 252 00:15:10,991 --> 00:15:13,411 needs to be done to get permission. 253 00:15:13,471 --> 00:15:16,991 and so the information is available to you. 254 00:15:17,161 --> 00:15:19,511 So, don't forget IP is fuel.