Speaker:

Greetings, friends. My name is Jess McLean, and I'm here to provide you with some blueprints

Speaker:

of disruption. This weekly podcast is dedicated to amplifying the work of activists, examining

Speaker:

power structures, and sharing the success stories from the grassroots. Through these discussions,

Speaker:

we hope to provide folks with the tools and the inspiration they need to start to dismantle

Speaker:

capitalism, decolonize our spaces, and bring about the political revolution that we know

Speaker:

we need. Good morning Kitchener Waterloo. Can you introduce yourself, please? Sure. I'm

Speaker:

Aaron. He and him are my pronouns. I live in Kitchener, Ontario on block two of the Haldimand

Speaker:

Tract, a land that was granted to the Six Nations and has been reduced to 5 % of its original

Speaker:

allowance. I'm really grateful to be here. It's snowing and just happy to be inside and

Speaker:

warm today. We can't say that for all of our comrades, can we? That's a little bit of why

Speaker:

you're here. You are part of a group, KW Fightback. You'll have to clarify that that maybe isn't

Speaker:

the fight back that a lot of folks are familiar with. A few folks use that actually. have 230

Speaker:

Fightback is a great tenant union in Toronto, but what do you folks do? What does KW Fightback

Speaker:

do in general? Yeah. So we're a grassroots community organization. We don't necessarily subscribe

Speaker:

to any particular leftist tendency. We're just kind of a loose coalition of folks that are

Speaker:

engaged in a lot of like grassroots community-based projects. Mostly for the last couple of years,

Speaker:

one of the biggest projects that we've been engaged with is supporting uh the tent city

Speaker:

in Camman at 100 Victoria in downtown Kitchener, which is the only legally sanctioned tent city

Speaker:

in Ontario. So just supporting our neighbors who live on the street, helping them resist

Speaker:

police violence and displacement and providing mutual aid and just, you know, building community.

Speaker:

Excellent. It's legally sanctioned, but that doesn't mean it's not without legal battle

Speaker:

still, yes? Yes, that's correct. So basically, to give sort of the longer background and

Speaker:

for clarification, I was not around for this entire history. Some of this is secondhand

Speaker:

on my part. But essentially, this encampment was created after another encampment was destroyed

Speaker:

in the large park that was here in downtown Kitchener. And then in 2023, basically Waterloo

Speaker:

Community Legal Services, as well as some of the folks who were defending it at the time,

Speaker:

were able to go to a provincial court and receive a decision from Justice Valente that

Speaker:

the uh region, which was the property owner and the entity responsible for providing

Speaker:

housing at the same time, which is kind of like key to the litigation, was deemed not to

Speaker:

be entitled to evict people from this specific area of public land. because the rest of Kitchener

Speaker:

is covered by a public camping criminalization by law. So they were told that this particular

Speaker:

location, because they don't have enough housing for everybody, I think I have the numbers

Speaker:

elsewhere if we want to get into it, but essentially there's like 350 shelter beds and almost 2,500

Speaker:

unhoused people in Waterloo region, which is Kitchener, Waterloo, and Cambridge. And so

Speaker:

basically it was decided by Justice Volante, by the provincial court that the region was

Speaker:

not entitled to evict people from this location until they could show that they were actually

Speaker:

able to provide housing as they're required to by the charter. And so that means that since

Speaker:

2023, this encampment has essentially been legally protected. We have a court order saying that

Speaker:

they're not allowed to evict people, they're not allowed to prevent people from setting

Speaker:

up all this type of stuff. And then the exciting and new legal developments are that last year,

Speaker:

the region tried to pass a site specific bylaw specifically for this location. And we have

Speaker:

ended up in litigation against them once again. And in my opinion, and it seemed at least

Speaker:

initially from some of the questions that the justice was asking at the original hearing,

Speaker:

after which they granted a temporary injunction, meaning basically like until the legal decision

Speaker:

is finalized, the region is not entitled to. evict anybody. And when they did that, they

Speaker:

were asking a lot of questions about like, well, how is this bylaw any different? Like, how

Speaker:

is this any different than the decision that we just made? So I hope that that means that

Speaker:

they will tend to decide in our favor. But unfortunately, we got to keep waiting a couple months to

Speaker:

find out, uh keep sort of like having the proceedings get kicked down the road. I was trying to do

Speaker:

a little bit of my research to my understanding, you don't have a next court date. uh But they

Speaker:

are trying to evict people by April. And the justification that they're using is they

Speaker:

want to use that area as some sort of construction for a transit facility. Am I right? Is that

Speaker:

correct? Yeah. basically uh Kitchener technically has a go station. It's not great. It's really

Speaker:

quite a struggle to get into Toronto. So with this, I do sympathize. And basically they

Speaker:

have been trying to create a new GO station that's A, closer to downtown Kitchener and

Speaker:

B, much larger. And that is not the site of the encampment. 100 Victoria, like the proposed

Speaker:

site of the GO station is at Victoria and King Street, which is about three blocks uh south

Speaker:

of the encampment. But what they want is to have the location that the encampment is at,

Speaker:

B, uh I think they call it like lay down or something like a staging area for vehicles

Speaker:

and equipment. Yeah. So it's just an empty gravel lot basically. And they want to be able to

Speaker:

put all the stuff down. uh But there's like several things that are strange about this.

Speaker:

First of all, there are several pieces of region owned land within a few blocks of the location

Speaker:

of this proposed go station, which they also could have used. And also we, the residents,

Speaker:

the public at large have repeatedly requested that the region simply designate another location

Speaker:

where people can instead set up camps and be protected in doing so and everyone would happily

Speaker:

move. I- don't like that idea? They don't like that idea, no. So basically one of the reasons

Speaker:

the litigation has kept being delayed is that originally I believe the hearing was supposed

Speaker:

to be in November or something like this. And then the region announced that they were willing

Speaker:

to undergo mediation and basically- the because we, you know, like I personally and fight back

Speaker:

are not parties to the litigation. I'm a witness in the litigation. Who is when when you say

Speaker:

we were in litigation, I assumed you were. So who does do that job of launching a court challenge

Speaker:

to prevent the municipality or the region from doing whatever they want? The litigation is

Speaker:

on behalf of encampment residents. So certain encampment residents are named uh petitioners

Speaker:

in the court case. and it's being done by Waterloo Community Legal Services. They're amazing

Speaker:

and they were also the lawyers in the first round of litigation. But yeah, so basically

Speaker:

in- I was writing down their names. No worries at all. Yeah, so basically in the fall, the

Speaker:

region approached Waterloo Community Legal Services and said, we'll go through mediation with you

Speaker:

folks. And basically all the residents who were involved with the litigation, all of the

Speaker:

community members tangential to it were like, great, we have- two things that we would be

Speaker:

happy to receive out of mediation. You can either decriminalize public camping on all public

Speaker:

land or designate a couple of public sites that people can go to. uh You know, like in

Speaker:

my world, there are a lot of things that would be really great to have. I would love a site

Speaker:

where there's running water. I would love a site where there's electricity. uh I would

Speaker:

love a site where there's an indoor location. There are places like this near downtown Kitchener

Speaker:

that are owned by the government. uh I would love a place where there's like grass and trees.

Speaker:

uh Nobody actually likes where it is because it's at a very busy intersection and it's in

Speaker:

a location where there's just like a high degree of confrontation with passing motorists and

Speaker:

stuff like this simply because of its location. The region keeps trying to frame it as if

Speaker:

we fight back, are agitators that are trying to make it so we're defending this site because

Speaker:

we just want to prove a point and we... oh We're just like evil antifa or whatever. And it's

Speaker:

like, we are perfectly happy with any solution that allows all of our neighbors to be safe

Speaker:

and housed in a low barrier way. It's just that all of the structures that exist are A, insufficient

Speaker:

and B, extremely punitive in ways that are very predictively discriminatory against our relatives.

Speaker:

I noted that because we're definitely going to get into the carceral aspect of most solutions

Speaker:

to homelessness. It makes me irate though, like when a state actor needs land, needs

Speaker:

to expropriate land, like they pay landowners, right? Like it's just kind of a given. It's

Speaker:

not sometimes super fair. People don't like to be displaced, but like it's a given that

Speaker:

there would be some sort of compensation. And just the fact that like these folks are

Speaker:

just mere objects to the equation to be moved. And I know I'm not blaming you for offering

Speaker:

these types of solutions. I know you want housing. You are trying to make a point. It's not the

Speaker:

point that they think you're trying to make, like you're defending some gravel land. You

Speaker:

are, it's a concept that we will get into, but the, like the idea that they couldn't then

Speaker:

just provide some sort of actual shelter housing for these people to then just forever have

Speaker:

whatever piece of land they need across the city to have a staging area, right? Because

Speaker:

everybody would have somewhere to go. But none of these reasons, right, the transport hub,

Speaker:

the certain location, none of it is really what the problem is, right? Why don't they want

Speaker:

an encampment? Yeah. And to your point even about expropriating, what is happening here

Speaker:

is a land purchase. uh Metrolinx is buying the site from the regional government. And so

Speaker:

they could quite easily be like, okay, we're going to set aside like $200,000, which is

Speaker:

a trivial amount of money to the region to buy out the residents. You know, like, I'm sure

Speaker:

that, you know, $10,000 a piece would get each of these people very far, but they're not willing

Speaker:

to do that. or to work any kind of housing into this massive project when there's a clear

Speaker:

need. It's maddening, but I think once you point out these hypocrisies that we're left

Speaker:

with, then why? Yeah. Why is the region doing this? Why are all these actors uh doing what

Speaker:

they're doing? Do you have a theory? I'm sure you do. have a lot of theories because

Speaker:

another thing too is what money they do spend is spent in really futile ways. One of the

Speaker:

results from the previous round of litigation in 2023 is they created an unsheltered worker

Speaker:

outreach program, which is basically social workers that the region employs. These are

Speaker:

the primary outreach workers that come to the camp. Well, they used to come to the camp.

Speaker:

I actually don't have beef with these individuals personally. I think that for the most part,

Speaker:

they think that they're nice people and they think that they're trying to help people and

Speaker:

in some rare instances, they succeed. But basically, like, they are individuals who are paid by

Speaker:

the region, they actually just were hiring. So I've learned that they get paid $100,000

Speaker:

plus each by the region. Again, wonder how better that money could be spent. And they're,

Speaker:

you know, professional. overwhelmingly white women who come to the site and discuss with

Speaker:

the residents about potentially getting them services, whether it's like getting them into

Speaker:

a shelter of which again, the ratio is five to one and house people to shelter beds in

Speaker:

the area. uh Or in the last few months, they've been engaged in purchasing motel stays for

Speaker:

people. But the motel stays are short and indefinite term. So anecdotally from the people

Speaker:

who stay there. We know that most people have been told they can't expect to stay there beyond

Speaker:

March or April, which is A, the springtime, but B, the predicted date of the litigation.

Speaker:

And they have, I can't say that this was intentional because I don't know inside their minds, but

Speaker:

I can tell you that every resident that I know to be a named participant in the litigation

Speaker:

was offered a motel bed first. And they also overwhelmingly offer these motel beds to white

Speaker:

people. Like as far as I know, like, out of maybe like, basically none of the original

Speaker:

white residents of the encampment when I started coming around in like, 2024 winter are still

Speaker:

around, but all of the black residents of the encampment are still around. The only black

Speaker:

person I know of who has been offered a motel bed is married to a white man. And basically

Speaker:

like, I think that this is like deliberately part of the structure. They're trying to say

Speaker:

that like, their programming is successful. We're moving people out. uh Every time that

Speaker:

the region goes before the judge, they're always saying like nobody of the original resident

Speaker:

stays at the encampment anymore. And that's from like, first of all, a fundamental misunderstanding

Speaker:

of how homelessness works. But also they showed up when they passed, when they were going to

Speaker:

pass this new site specific bylaw in April of 2025, they showed up on one day for a couple

Speaker:

of hours, took down the names of everybody they could talk to at that one instance. and said,

Speaker:

these 30 people are the residents of the encampment. uh Even though at the time I can tell you that

Speaker:

there were 50 people staying there. And also, those people are the residents of the encampment

Speaker:

on that day. Is naturally a changing thing. uh And as long as there is not enough, because

Speaker:

the original court decision does not apply to the people, like the 2023 court decision does

Speaker:

not apply to the people who. stayed there at the time. applies to every unhoused person

Speaker:

in Waterloo Region. And so they deliberately have tried to limit the scope of who they

Speaker:

are considering to be essentially like a deserving recipient of the services. And they're targeting

Speaker:

those people. And then basically anyone who's not a deserving recipient of those services,

Speaker:

whether because they're black or because they weren't on their original list, is just subject

Speaker:

to being kicked out and in many cases incarceration. One of the big drivers of that is that since

Speaker:

the site-specific bylaw was passed, so before the site-specific bylaw was passed, the region

Speaker:

employed Barbara Collins Security, which is a private security company, to have security

Speaker:

guards essentially in the parking lot next to the encampment most of the time, and then every

Speaker:

couple hours they would walk through and patrol. And during that time, I had a passingly polite

Speaker:

relationship with these individuals. uh But basically once the site specific bylaw was

Speaker:

announced, they moved security onto the site. So they are constantly inside their vehicle

Speaker:

on the site watching everybody. uh And the security guards, you know, there's like intense hostility

Speaker:

between them and the residents. uh There's like particularly like numerous of the security

Speaker:

guards, but one of them in particular. really weaponize like calling police or calling ambulance

Speaker:

on people. So there's been lots of instances where someone is like, you know, like a fight

Speaker:

happens or like someone like seems like they're non responsive for a minute. And then security

Speaker:

calls an ambulance for the person. And then like, I've witnessed instances where the person

Speaker:

was so severely triggered by the site of emergency services that they like freaked out and started

Speaker:

screaming and like throwing things and I had to like pull them aside and calm them down.

Speaker:

ah And then there's been other instances where like, allegedly, that I was not personally

Speaker:

there, but according to several people who were there, there was like, individual who stays

Speaker:

at the camp for a long time, who I know to be an incredibly nice man, who happens to be a

Speaker:

black man. He was like putting his pants on as he walked through the encampment. And so

Speaker:

he was like holding his belt, like it was just in his hand. And the security guard was like,

Speaker:

he threatened me with his belt and he subsequently went to prison for several months. as a consequence

Speaker:

of threatening the security guard with his belt. And I know of at least two occasions where

Speaker:

this has happened involving this particular security guard. So we're starting to get an

Speaker:

idea of the carceral aspect. Now, I had, we have spoken to folks where motels are purchased

Speaker:

like blocks or shelters are operated like jails, right? With curfews, with no visitors, with

Speaker:

this threat of eviction hovering over you, you know, with noncompliance all the time and like

Speaker:

that. is easy to describe as a jail. But we kind of get excited when we hear, not excited,

Speaker:

but, know, legally sanctioned encampment. It's like that sounds like progress, but then

Speaker:

it also does allow that extra level of enforcement, right? Where it's almost just another site

Speaker:

for the state to control in that way. Yeah. I mean, we have an We have a site here in

Speaker:

the region called a better tent city, which in my opinion is a concentration camp. I also

Speaker:

have experienced similar sites in British Columbia, which in my opinion are simply concentration

Speaker:

camps for homeless people. They're just shipping containers in, you know, the one here is out

Speaker:

by the dump. It's not next to any services. There's no ins and outs. There's no visitors.

Speaker:

You can't even have overnight visitor if they're your partner. Someone died last winter because

Speaker:

of that, because he needed life saving medical care and there was no trained staff. The region

Speaker:

bragged about building this. We covered that, right? And we were like, this is, this looks

Speaker:

horrific. It was nowhere near transit and it had, so how did that turn out? Awful.

Speaker:

mean, people have, numerous people have died there, not just this one instance and numerous

Speaker:

of the people who stay at 100 VIG say that they tried to stay there and they were trespassed

Speaker:

or they couldn't. you know, have their pets or have their partners or use or have in and

Speaker:

outs or couldn't access services or whatever, for whatever reason, they were like, it's

Speaker:

actually not tenable for me to live here. And so they chose not to. And the thing also is

Speaker:

like, I want to make it abundantly clear that the level of, you know, like security presence,

Speaker:

police presence, constructive evictions that the region has engaged in have continued to

Speaker:

escalate since the region passed the site specific bylaw, despite the injunction. because prior

Speaker:

to the site-specific bylaw, security was not present, the level of criminalization was much

Speaker:

less. At least one person that I know of has been trespassed from the site. Actually, I

Speaker:

think maybe two people that I know of have been trespassed from the site by the region, which

Speaker:

they're still entitled to do under their bylaw if the person is, I can't remember the exact

Speaker:

wording, like engaged in disruptive behavior, which like... It's a fucking homeless encampment.

Speaker:

Like, people, like, I'm sorry, people are crazy here. Like, that's intrinsic. Like, just don't

Speaker:

worry about it. It's an excuse to then criminalize, right? To say, you don't want this in your

Speaker:

city either, right? They've also increasingly been doing that to the few services that they

Speaker:

do provide. So previously I said the social workers used to come. uh They used to come

Speaker:

when the litigation was active before this injunction, like over the summer. They would

Speaker:

come like two and three days a week and they would try to talk to people. And then the region,

Speaker:

due to us basically putting pressure on them, has like very minimal port-a-potty servicing

Speaker:

and very minimal garbage servicing, uh which in and of itself was like, this is such a

Speaker:

digression, but like a huge battle because they were using the garbage servicing as a way basically

Speaker:

to like... take space back from the residents by putting way too many dumpsters on site and

Speaker:

forcing people to move their tents every time they were trying to clear the garbage. And

Speaker:

basically the region has increasingly militarized this process. So now like every Thursday,

Speaker:

the region facility staff come. It's the only time the toilets get serviced. It's the only

Speaker:

time the garbage gets picked up. It's the only time anything gets salted, even though it's

Speaker:

been the snowiest winter on record out here. And they bring police with them every single

Speaker:

time. because allegedly the porta potty truck man was maced by somebody once, which like

Speaker:

I've been going to the encampment for like a year and a half. Like I've gotten into arguments

Speaker:

with people. Like people have really gotten mad at me and like no one has ever physically

Speaker:

threatened me. And like I, you know, this is going to be audio. I have a deep voice, but

Speaker:

I'm literally five feet tall. Like I'm not a physically imposing person and I have never

Speaker:

felt afraid for my safety there. And now The social workers also claim that they feel afraid

Speaker:

for their safety when they're on site. And so now they always show up with police. And so,

Speaker:

you know, this also contributes to the criminalization because they show up on a Thursday when all

Speaker:

of the disruptions are happening. you know, like, so, yeah, this incident happened three

Speaker:

weeks ago where this gentleman, he was freshly released from incarceration because the security

Speaker:

guard claimed that he was threatening him, even though he alleges that he was not. um He went

Speaker:

to prison for several months. He gets out of prison. He's freshly back, the social worker

Speaker:

walks up to him with a cop behind her and is like, hey bud, how's it going? I haven't seen

Speaker:

you in a while. How you been? And so he quite understandably crashes the fuck out. He's like,

Speaker:

what do mean how have I been? How do you think I've been? I'm fucking homeless and I just

Speaker:

got out of prison. And he's like yelling at her and he's like, you know, like, it's like,

Speaker:

oh, we can try to get you services like blah, blah. And like. You know, she's, you know,

Speaker:

trying to do her like white woman social worker voice. And the whole time the cop is like edging

Speaker:

up behind her, like closer and closer. And I'm like trying to stand in front of the cop, like,

Speaker:

please back up. You're just making him more stressed out. And then the cop who herself

Speaker:

was a white woman was like, I don't understand. I have a right to be here. I'm a member of

Speaker:

the public too. And I'm like, you're harassing this man in his home and he's freaking out

Speaker:

because you people. are just using this as an opportunity to send him back to prison. Like

Speaker:

that's what this actually is. Right. And he, he quite like honestly kudos to him. He was

Speaker:

like, you know, y'all keep talking about these motel rooms and it's just bullshit. Like, you

Speaker:

know, it's motel rooms for the white people and Maplehurst for the rest of us. And like,

Speaker:

she was just gobsmacked. Like she was like, ah, and then she just like kind of walked

Speaker:

away. And then the cop kept trying to approach and I was just like, leave him alone. He didn't

Speaker:

do anything. There's no reason for you to be here. And she's like, I have a right to be

Speaker:

here. And it's like, don't. It's his house. Maybe you can't say it, but I can. Like any

Speaker:

social worker that shows up in a homeless encampment with cops is not fucking good people. That's

Speaker:

what I'm saying. they've got the knowledge and experience to know how triggering that is,

Speaker:

what kind of power imbalance that creates. Right. And that kind of circumstances that that's

Speaker:

just collecting a paycheck. That makes me really mad. I mean, it is horrifying. And that's

Speaker:

I get to that and I go, what the fuck do you do about all these are so many little battles

Speaker:

like I'm talking like the dumpster battle, the social workers behave in such bad the garbage,

Speaker:

like the toilet cleanup, the trespassing even though they shouldn't be the legal cases.

Speaker:

Aaron, this is a lot like, how are you? It's like a two part question. How are you all coping

Speaker:

with this kind of battle? It shouldn't be this hard to just take care of our unhoused members

Speaker:

of our community, right? Like that should be like a mutual aid network, right? Like we can

Speaker:

do that. We can live as a community and then we can figure out housing. This is an onslaught

Speaker:

for advocates, right? And for the encampment residents. How y'all coping with that? Yeah,

Speaker:

I mean, it's been a lot. mean, first of all, like, it's not just me, obviously, and it's

Speaker:

not just like the small, like, inner group of folks who, like, do direct support. Like, we're

Speaker:

kind of embedded within sort of like a growing and tentacular, like, mutual aid network of

Speaker:

people who are a lot more, like, casually involved, who just, like, bring supplies. We've been,

Speaker:

you know, very heavily engaged all winter in making sure there's firewood, ah which has

Speaker:

been really important because, again, it's been, you know... snowy winter on record out here.

Speaker:

But honestly, like, it's, it's, it's not been the most fun. I'm not going to lie to you.

Speaker:

uh It's, it's been a pretty stressful time. I think that something that's really important

Speaker:

to me about it is like, I first of all, like value tremendously the symbolic importance

Speaker:

of a space like this, not just for the people who stay there, not just for the region who

Speaker:

knows that they have to continue to deal with us, but also for other people who try to do

Speaker:

this kind of work because I've tried to do this kind of work elsewhere in worse situations

Speaker:

where it's like, you know that this person has set up a tent and they're going to be moved

Speaker:

tonight. They're going to be moved tonight every single night. You know, at least in this situation,

Speaker:

like people have full blown cabins. Like one of the cabins there has a kitchen and three

Speaker:

bedrooms. Like, you know, like Defending people's right to have like an actual place to stay.

Speaker:

It's not perfect Sometimes there's violence and there's a lot of theft because people live

Speaker:

among each other in poverty but at least as a place that they have control over to a certain

Speaker:

extent and can actually stay in and like honestly like the company of the residents is what keeps

Speaker:

me going like, you know, I I say all the shit and we're like fighting and stuff but like

Speaker:

most of the time when I go there I just like show up start a campfire and then just like

Speaker:

smoke joints with the residents until my shift is over, you know, we just like hang out and

Speaker:

talk like and like that's the part that's really like enriching and healing about this kind

Speaker:

of work to me is like, you know, the folks who stay there are awesome. They're just really

Speaker:

nice people. They have so much more sense of like, you know, again, not that there's no

Speaker:

conflict, but to me, actually, the conflict is a sign of health because I see people

Speaker:

who stay at the encampment like really fight each other. Like I'm talking like screaming,

Speaker:

I'm talking like fist to cuffs. And then like the next day they'll be like, oh, this is my

Speaker:

brother, like here, please, like, this is my last cigarette, please have it. Like, you know,

Speaker:

like people have genuine real conflict with each other and then genuinely resolve it, which

Speaker:

is something that for me as an abolitionist is just like a dream to witness in real life.

Speaker:

And to understand that like all of these structures that people think are required to have society

Speaker:

are actually in the way of real human society. And it's the people that live with the least

Speaker:

structure that have what I think of as the closest to real human society. Community, even if

Speaker:

it's created here by necessity for survival, it's an alternate model of living, right? That's

Speaker:

mostly sustained outside of the capitalist system. and has even been able to exist despite

Speaker:

the onslaught from the capitalist system. And that's incredible, especially when we're

Speaker:

trying to find alternative ways to live. No, we don't want people to be without shelter.

Speaker:

ah But I think that's what you're getting at with the symbolic nature of the encampment.

Speaker:

Because I'm sure you're faced with a lot of the question. So you want people living in

Speaker:

encampments is that you're trying to protect this kind of living, right? This kind of harsh,

Speaker:

even though you just described community and a lot of humanity, these are harsh living

Speaker:

conditions that people probably mostly would rather not have to try to survive every day.

Speaker:

Um, what, what is your answer to that? Yeah. I mean, like I, you know, as someone who is

Speaker:

not. always lived here, uh as someone who has lived both outside of Canada and outside of

Speaker:

North America, it is evident to me that capitalism is collapsing and the increasing numbers of

Speaker:

people here and everywhere else in the world are finding themselves already in these situations

Speaker:

of precarity. I am not the person who is putting someone in a position where they have to stay

Speaker:

there. I am just the person who shows up when they stay there the first night. And I'm like,

Speaker:

here's a tent, here's a sleeping bag. I'll come check on you in the morning and make sure you're

Speaker:

okay. And to be clear, not just me, you know, like we, the people, ah but I'm not putting

Speaker:

the person in the position where they couldn't make their rent, where they got kicked out

Speaker:

by their abusive parent because they're trans, because they're a Sudanese refugee, because

Speaker:

you know, the UAE in Saudi Arabia are having a proxy war in their country and they ended

Speaker:

up here. Like so many of the people who stay at the encampment are refugees, are queer,

Speaker:

are trans, are disabled. And it's like, I want the world where they all can be safe and housed

Speaker:

and enjoy middle-class life like I do, but that's not the world that we live in. And I simply

Speaker:

want. them to have the best experience that they can have when they're in this situation

Speaker:

with the understanding that increasing numbers of people over the coming decades will end

Speaker:

up in that situation until eventually it'll probably be all of us. so let's hope we figured

Speaker:

out like how to do it, you know, how to navigate through that. But I think the sense of community

Speaker:

that it builds is part of the key there. Yeah. And for me, like I, you know, like I relate

Speaker:

a lot to a lot of anarchist theory. And I think that I think of what we're doing as sort of

Speaker:

like dual power building in the sense of like these other structures are collapsing and

Speaker:

that's kind of an over here problem. But in the meantime, we have like our little area

Speaker:

over here that we can build a structure in that can be stable, that can do the work. And like

Speaker:

this structure over here doesn't even need to fully collapse for this structure to start

Speaker:

like building, expanding, taking the people who are leaving anyway and like making something

Speaker:

good so that, know, whatever happens over here with the big structure, we're kind of like,

Speaker:

if it falls apart, great, we're here, everyone can come to us. Otherwise, like, we have a

Speaker:

better thing going here on this side anyway. Imagine that, you know, I think that would,

Speaker:

for me, it's a moment to realize that, yeah, we're over here, they can come to us, that

Speaker:

statement that like, that alternative way of living that we've looked down upon and demonized

Speaker:

and mom, or even like, you know, felt bad for, could actually hold a lot of the secrets um

Speaker:

to this inevitable transition that we're going to go through that a lot of us are trying

Speaker:

to resist, right? Especially like shit lips, right? They see the decline, but they're like,

Speaker:

no, we're going to salvage some of this. And like, that will be a rude awakening when they

Speaker:

do end up, you know, in that moment of crisis. yeah, I think there's some irony there. I

Speaker:

don't know what to do with that irony though. Well, and to me also something that's worth

Speaker:

saying is like the structures that be have a vested interest in the situation of the people

Speaker:

at the very bottom to be as bad as possible. Because, you know, if somebody told me like,

Speaker:

oh, you don't have to work a job, you can just set up a cabin in the woods and like trap and

Speaker:

like have a camp and live there with your friends like. I wouldn't work a job anymore. They

Speaker:

want you to see that the homeless person on the street has to sleep on a sewer grate to

Speaker:

stay warm every night and can't set up a structure so that you can be like, oh shit, guess I better

Speaker:

work at Tim Horton's then. That is necessary. Part of what you're saying, why are they doing

Speaker:

this? They don't consciously know that, but that's part of it. They don't want people to

Speaker:

be able to drive past and be like, oh. m I don't know, these homeless people, like they got

Speaker:

cabins, they seem to be chilling, people bring them food, like I could do that. That's probably

Speaker:

better than staying with my abusive parents, right? Yeah, I think some of them consciously

Speaker:

do, right? The system does consciously punish folks working or being able to eke out a survival

Speaker:

or an existence rather outside of the market, right? Sex workers face the same kind of

Speaker:

stigma. Right. It's like must be punished, must be ostracized so that you do not even

Speaker:

consider non-compliance. It makes me think of, um, cause you know, you mentioned like

Speaker:

outside of Canada, um, in, my home country in Columbia, um, cause we're an incredibly

Speaker:

internally displaced people, right? A lot of refugees from various parts of the country.

Speaker:

And one thing that people have always been able to do. because the government doesn't

Speaker:

actively stop them from doing this is there's a mountain, build a community. People bring

Speaker:

bricks, they have no homes, they build communities. And eventually those communities, eventually

Speaker:

the government has to bring electricity and bring things because, you have a town here,

Speaker:

this is fully set up. And that's what happens when... when we don't actively stop it. Like

Speaker:

what's happening here is the government is actively stopping us from being able to build

Speaker:

anything, to do anything. Like we could go farther, but they stop us, you know? Like... Yeah, yeah.

Speaker:

And very much to your point, like there used to be an encampment here uh in the woods,

Speaker:

like outside of town. in an area that was deliberately out of the way that people chose to be like,

Speaker:

we can set up, can, you know, like trap and like do whatever and take care of ourselves.

Speaker:

And the region went in and kicked them out. So like, they, you know, like, they often say,

Speaker:

like, these people are in the way, these people are in the way. And it's like, it's not because

Speaker:

they're in the way, you just don't want them to do that. Like, you don't like, yeah, like,

Speaker:

there's something about like, not wanting to have this sort of like, landless peasant

Speaker:

core that's not actively part of the capitalist structure that they're like, no, we can't

Speaker:

have that. We have to destroy those people. They have to go to prison so we can enslave

Speaker:

them or we just keep moving them along until they die of exposure. Yeah. Here in Toronto,

Speaker:

like it's always like the encampments that are under bridges or hidden or stuff. Those get

Speaker:

torn apart and barely anyone even notices because it's hidden. there's a safety in in being

Speaker:

in the public eye, you could say, you know, because then, then it exposes their violence

Speaker:

when it happens. Exactly. Yeah. And there's other other aspects of safety too. Like that's

Speaker:

always why I explain to people who uh donate to the encampment and also to people who like

Speaker:

stay there and then leave. And then, you know, why, why do you focus on this place, particularly

Speaker:

there are other places and it's like the fact that this place is public, is visible, is large,

Speaker:

is so important. The oversight that we're able to provide to make sure that the government

Speaker:

isn't harming people as much as they could, right? For all the struggle that it is, there's

Speaker:

so many victories. People have had cabins set up there for two and three years now. And there's

Speaker:

so many women and queer folks who stay there, black folks who stay there who are like...

Speaker:

If I were to stay individually on the streets, I would be subject to so much more violence

Speaker:

as opposed to here. Like, no, I'm not saying that no violence happens obviously, but like,

Speaker:

you're not the only woman on the site. You're not the only queer person on the site. You're

Speaker:

not the only black person on the site. So if something happens, someone will stand up for

Speaker:

you. talked about the motivations, but kind of in a really vague way, right? The system

Speaker:

and these players, but there's a real economy, even like a local economy that relies on homelessness.

Speaker:

Those folks are motivated in this cycle, right? In perpetuating this cycle. Can you teach us

Speaker:

more about that? Yeah, I have a lot of issues with a lot of the service providers in the

Speaker:

area, like even individually. So actually right now, the encampment is across the street from

Speaker:

uh one of the locations of a service provider, which is a nonprofit organization. Sorry, I'm

Speaker:

American, so the Canadian nonprofit industrial complex is a little opaque to me. uh But my

Speaker:

understanding is they're a nonprofit, but they're primarily funded by the regional and provincial

Speaker:

government. I could be wrong about this. uh But they operate a soup kitchen across the

Speaker:

street. It's also where a lot of people's benefits are processed through and stuff like this.

Speaker:

these locations, again, The people who are staffed there have a vested interest in their

Speaker:

salary. And so they have a vested interest in not solving the problem. And they also participate

Speaker:

very heavily in the criminalization of folks who stay at the encampment. I personally am

Speaker:

banned from the site of the soup kitchen because I tried to prevent them from arresting a 20-year-old

Speaker:

black boy for jaywalking with four cops. So now I'm never allowed to go back. And I like,

Speaker:

I think again, like, I don't like, don't interpersonally know how to feel about these frankly, overwhelmingly

Speaker:

white women again, because they all like, pose themselves as being concerned about wanting

Speaker:

to help people having this altruism, being a caring person, having this expertise. A little

Speaker:

halo. Yeah. And then like, everything that they do is standing in the way of whether that person

Speaker:

is actually able to get out of this situation, including quite frankly, collecting 100 bands

Speaker:

off these people's backs every year. Like that money, like quite directly, if you just disseminated

Speaker:

that hundred bands to the people who stay there, it would have a measurably better impact than

Speaker:

paying this woman to come once a week. Like. And I think that that, like, I just, like,

Speaker:

I have to assume that there's a level of cognitive dissonance happening because I can't imagine

Speaker:

that a person, like, would keep telling themselves, I'm a good person, as they're, like, calling

Speaker:

the cops on these people, as they're, like, twiddling their thumbs while this person freezes

Speaker:

to death. Like, Because otherwise it's like, okay, I guess you're just my enemy and you're

Speaker:

evil, you know? You've got to hope that there's a way to reach those kinds of people because

Speaker:

like some of them are spending their energy and what they think is a good cause, right?

Speaker:

So as opposed to being a nimby, right? They are in a way when they call the cops, like

Speaker:

they're not the ones like we've got folks like they will pick it in and can't be right that

Speaker:

will just like petition their counselors to all ends of the earth to get rid of whatever

Speaker:

home uh folks have. These folks seem reachable, but it's uh yeah, a little bit of that liberal

Speaker:

ideology kind of masks some of those harms. Yeah. When I think a lot of it comes back to

Speaker:

the idea of like deservingness, like whether they think it consciously or not. I think that

Speaker:

they think that for a person to deserve the services that they have to be of a certain

Speaker:

presentation, have a certain level of gratitude and subservience that is really challenging.

Speaker:

I think that a lot of it also is like, I don't mind if a person... screams at me. I don't

Speaker:

mind if a person threatens me, especially because I have security in knowing that someone might

Speaker:

verbally threaten me, but they're not going to do anything. And I also have a deep understanding

Speaker:

of like, if you have been living on the street for more than I mean, I imagine myself like

Speaker:

I get so dysregulated if I sleep less than eight hours a night in my own home in my own bed.

Speaker:

Like if I slept on the street for a week and a half, I would be what I call the yelling

Speaker:

person, the person who's screaming to themself all day long. Like that, like, I think that

Speaker:

they're not trained and not resourced. Like I want to give them that small credit because

Speaker:

I see them genuinely, like I see a lot of workers in this situation and I've been workers in

Speaker:

this situation to be clear where they like, they set out to do something good. They're

Speaker:

very under resourced. They're directed in such a way that what they're able to do is very

Speaker:

limited. Um, and then they continually are the person who has the person who has had their

Speaker:

life fall apart, screaming at them. And so they burn out and become exhausted and then

Speaker:

they just become hardened and bitter toward that. But my answer is get another job. It's

Speaker:

quite simple. If you are hardened toward the work that you are doing, you should stop doing

Speaker:

it. Because if you think as a service provider, like at least I had good intentions when I

Speaker:

came into this, therefore that will carry me through as a good person. Now the fuck it won't.

Speaker:

Stop doing it. Yeah. I mean. We say this to cops, but I think a certain kind of person

Speaker:

becomes a cop in the first place. Right. But I do see people at the line kind of pleading

Speaker:

with them or even with ICE, you know, they were singing to the federal buildings the other

Speaker:

day, you know, you can change your mind. And I was like, it's a little more than that, but

Speaker:

like we could get there. So beyond the legal challenges though, and the kind of direct

Speaker:

support, how are you folks organizing? to protect these community members and, you know, defend

Speaker:

the right to even have an encampment. Yeah, I mean, I think that a lot of it has been uh

Speaker:

keeping public awareness on the site. This is not really part that I participate in, but

Speaker:

like the comms team does a really amazing job of like outreaching to our local community,

Speaker:

like explaining to them, like continually like putting out things that like address these

Speaker:

types of questions like why, why do we need this place? Like what don't Do the people there

Speaker:

just want to be unhoused for the fun of it? Kind of addressing these pieces. I think that

Speaker:

for me and for all of us, it really remains to be seen what's going to happen uh in the

Speaker:

litigation. uh But in terms of for myself, I've just been making sure as much as I can, which

Speaker:

has been, again, just an ongoing and constant battle that whatever. constructive eviction

Speaker:

behaviors that the region tries to engage in that we like observe them, prevent them as

Speaker:

much as possible, uh document them, and then raise that to the larger community and to

Speaker:

the legal team. Because they like, as I said, ever since they passed the site-specific bylaw,

Speaker:

even though they're currently enjoined from enforcing it, many, many things have changed

Speaker:

since before they did that. And they'll say that that's not bylaw enforcement, but that's

Speaker:

what they're doing. ah And so we just have to continually watch them. And I think for me

Speaker:

also, like a big part of it has been like increasing the residents agency and participation in that.

Speaker:

So we have a couple of like members of our organization who are current or former residents of the

Speaker:

encampment. And then just like for me personally, like every time I find out someone has a cell

Speaker:

phone that they're able to keep reasonably charged, I'm like, here's my number, I'll text you and

Speaker:

I'm going to come and like you please text me if you need anything. And like now I have like.

Speaker:

six or seven of them who can text me. at any time I can be like, Hey, is XYZ on the site?

Speaker:

Like, can you go check for me or whatever? And like, I think that that, you know, the thing

Speaker:

about mutual aid is that people, it has to become mutual eventually, right? Like, you know, we

Speaker:

all start from this position where obviously like things are unequal and the provision of

Speaker:

aid will be one way for a while, but like, that it's not about becoming transactional, but

Speaker:

it's about gaining a sense of mutual responsibility for one another. And so, you know, for example,

Speaker:

like yesterday wasn't feeling so hot and it was the garbage day and I usually show up and

Speaker:

make sure that their region workers don't like steal propane tanks from people because they

Speaker:

do that all the fucking time. And I was able to just like text one of the residents and

Speaker:

be like, Hey, my other friend is going to come like, just, know, hear the things I'm worried

Speaker:

about, try to make sure they leave you some salt, blah, blah, blah. And he texts me back

Speaker:

and he's like, okay, great. I hope you feel better. Blah, blah, blah. Like, you know, like

Speaker:

Progressing to the point, I try to express this a lot, and it's something that I struggle

Speaker:

to express to white organizers a lot, that it's not just about dissolving the service provider,

Speaker:

service recipient boundary, though that's also huge part of it, but it's about genuinely becoming

Speaker:

neighbors and relatives and community members to each other in an honest way, where we honestly

Speaker:

care for and look out for each other. And I think that that is something that... will

Speaker:

only become more valuable as time goes on regardless. Regardless of what kind of conflicts we engage

Speaker:

in, I think of all of the organizing that I do as like, especially like mutual aid, like

Speaker:

ground building work is like, we are preparing to have a network for a crisis that we don't

Speaker:

know about yet. And when that crisis happens, hopefully we'll already have this network,

Speaker:

but it could be anything, right? Like, who knows, maybe the US will invade, maybe like. Maybe

Speaker:

we'll all get deported. Like, I don't know what's going to happen in 10 years, but I know that

Speaker:

like, I know these people, they all live near me. We all have a sense of mutual responsibility

Speaker:

for one another. And that is something that the encampment and this type of organizing

Speaker:

is like worth creating for me regardless. is a wrap on another episode of Blueprints

Speaker:

of Disruption. Thank you for joining us. Also, a very big thank you to the producer of our

Speaker:

show, Santiago Helu-Quintero. Blueprints of Disruption is an independent production operated

Speaker:

cooperatively. You can follow us on Twitter at BPofDisruption. If you'd like to help us

Speaker:

continue disrupting the status quo, please share our content. And if you have the means, consider

Speaker:

becoming a patron. Not only does our support come from the progressive community, so does

Speaker:

our content. So reach out to us and let us know what or who we should be amplifying. So until

Speaker:

next time, keep disrupting.