1 00:00:00,020 --> 00:00:04,060 One of the big talking points in podcasting at the minute is Apple's new support 2 00:00:04,060 --> 00:00:06,020 for video podcasting using HLS. 3 00:00:06,500 --> 00:00:09,780 And because of that, one of the big questions is, should you be using it? 4 00:00:10,080 --> 00:00:13,140 And the honest answer is, it depends on your podcast. 5 00:00:13,600 --> 00:00:16,460 And I know it depends, kind of a bit of a cop out, but it's true. 6 00:00:16,660 --> 00:00:18,280 It really does depend on your podcast. 7 00:00:18,640 --> 00:00:22,360 Because adding video can be a good move, but only if it actually fits what you're 8 00:00:22,360 --> 00:00:24,800 doing. For some shows, it makes complete sense. 9 00:00:25,360 --> 00:00:29,180 For example, if your podcast is interview-based or if you're already recording 10 00:00:29,180 --> 00:00:33,320 video for platforms like YouTube, then making that available on Apple Podcasts 11 00:00:33,320 --> 00:00:34,740 as well is a fairly easy win. 12 00:00:35,200 --> 00:00:38,660 You're not creating something new, you're just using what you already have but 13 00:00:38,660 --> 00:00:40,280 in another place your audience might be. 14 00:00:40,680 --> 00:00:44,820 But if your podcast is audio first or you don't currently record video, 15 00:00:45,040 --> 00:00:47,200 then this is where it's worth pausing for a second. 16 00:00:47,560 --> 00:00:51,600 Because adding video isn't just a switch you flip, it changes how you record, 17 00:00:51,860 --> 00:00:55,800 how you edit, your setup and your workflow. And if you're doing it just because 18 00:00:55,800 --> 00:00:59,400 it's a new feature, there's a good chance it just becomes more work but without 19 00:00:59,400 --> 00:01:02,200 much return. So here's a simple way to think about it. 20 00:01:02,600 --> 00:01:06,380 Are you already creating video or planning to? And would your audience actually 21 00:01:06,380 --> 00:01:08,620 benefit from watching instead of just listening? 22 00:01:09,420 --> 00:01:13,300 If the answer is yes, then it's definitely worth exploring. If not, 23 00:01:13,500 --> 00:01:17,580 you're probably better off continuing to focus on making your audio as strong as it can be. 24 00:01:17,980 --> 00:01:21,680 Because new features come and go, but a clear, engaging podcast, 25 00:01:22,060 --> 00:01:23,600 well, that's what keeps people listening. 26 00:01:24,180 --> 00:01:26,380 Until the next time, happy podcasting.