Speaker:

Welcome to another Ravel rant. You're stuck with me today. My name's Jessa. Santiago is

Speaker:

off celebrating his birthday as he should be. And I'm gonna get into this week's main rant

Speaker:

in just a second, but first, I've got to vent about some chicken sauce. That's right, chicken

Speaker:

sauce. You know, I was making hot chicken sandwiches for my family for dinner and I went into my

Speaker:

cupboard and for some reason, there was both a can of St. Hubert's gravy and Swiss chalet

Speaker:

gravy. This is very specific to Canadians. Anyone outside the country is listening and have no

Speaker:

idea what I'm talking about. These are like competing rotisserie chicken mainstays in Canada.

Speaker:

And just to be silly, but also to help me choose, I of course went to the internet, took a picture,

Speaker:

put it up, asked people to vote on it. Everything was going well. It was quite evenly paced,

Speaker:

to be honest, until Bob Chandler chimed in, of course. Any? idea that we had free will

Speaker:

disappeared when Bob told me that both St. Hubert and Swish LA had in fact been purchased by

Speaker:

the same company. So I don't even know which one we ended up choosing because frankly who

Speaker:

cares anymore. So yeah thanks Bob and of course late stage capitalism. I'm sure you can all

Speaker:

relate but what am I really here to talk about this week? What's got me riled up obviously

Speaker:

it's Doug Ford again. Of course it is. Last week, Ontario's Solicitor General Michael Kersner

Speaker:

announced an end to mandatory coroner's inquests into workplace deaths at construction sites,

Speaker:

specifically. These inquests were previously done on a case-by-case basis. They were meant

Speaker:

to look at each death specifically and find and issue recommendations. This was supposed

Speaker:

to have a preventative measure built it wouldn't happen to the next worker. Doug Ford's now

Speaker:

going to replace this with an annual general review of all deaths in the industry that year.

Speaker:

That's about 22 deaths a year now in Ontario that are all going to be lumped into one single

Speaker:

process, a process that isn't entirely clear right now, and their job will then be to provide

Speaker:

recommendations that people either listen to or don't. Now, I'm not going to pretend that

Speaker:

the inquiries that existed were ideal or that they were in any way preventing workers from

Speaker:

dying on the job, because we've seen these numbers actually go up over the years. The process

Speaker:

was a joke. It is a joke. Unfortunately, the province does have plenty of evidence behind

Speaker:

them that something needed to be done. And if it wasn't for their complete disdain for workers

Speaker:

and their lack of track record of making any of these sites safe. one might buy into the

Speaker:

reasoning they provided. They're telling us that they're looking to ease pressure on coroners

Speaker:

to get more timely recommendations. Timely is an issue, right? Like if you're looking to

Speaker:

prevent workers from dying in a similar way, we can't take 12 years to find out what happened.

Speaker:

And that's exactly what happened if folks can think back to Christmas Day many, many years

Speaker:

ago. Four workers lost their lives on a swing stage when it collapsed. They weren't harnessed.

Speaker:

Most of them were not harnessed. And in the end, a site supervisor that survived the accident

Speaker:

was the only one that went to jail. The company was fined less than a million dollars. And

Speaker:

finally, the coroner's inquest took place 12 years after the fact. It did issue recommendations

Speaker:

that Ontario has since adopted in terms of Heights training. harness training, workers had to

Speaker:

work on roofs safely by strapping themselves in and whatnot, and they have to take this

Speaker:

annually and get recertified. And so changes did take place, but I mean fall from heights

Speaker:

still account for 20% of workplace deaths. So you can imagine it over those 12 years that

Speaker:

folks were waiting to find out what really happened and to issue recommendations. There was 12

Speaker:

years where 20% of construction workers who were training or workplace, proper workplace

Speaker:

attitudes around working at heights. So, you know, there's no doubt that something had to

Speaker:

be done in order to speed things up. But you have to also keep in mind that Ford has made

Speaker:

cuts to the coroner services. So it's no wonder that there's such a backlog. And one has to

Speaker:

imagine how they can look at 22 cases some years more than that, and properly determine exactly

Speaker:

what went wrong and find constructive recommendations to make prevention happen. But like I said,

Speaker:

this government has done everything possible to actually make construction sites less safe.

Speaker:

So it's hard for us to believe that this is in the best interest of workers, if it's coming

Speaker:

from them. Let me tell you what I'm talking about. And I'm sure it won't surprise you that

Speaker:

most, if not all of Doug Ford's changes to the Labor Act and how the Ministry of Labor functions

Speaker:

has completely favored employers over workers. which obviously flies in the face of reality,

Speaker:

where we know massive interventions are sorely needed to protect workers from exploitation,

Speaker:

from that power imbalance that exists, that so obviously exists. Ford has made it easier

Speaker:

to misclassify workers, underpay them, he's made it harder to bring complaints forward,

Speaker:

and he's just provided fewer resources to ensure workplaces stay safe. Doug Ford's been particularly

Speaker:

cruel to the construction. industry workers. And let me tell you what I'm talking about.

Speaker:

He starts off by pretty much dismantling the Ontario College of Trades and taking all of

Speaker:

the things that they were responsible for underneath the Ministry of Labour. And the College of

Speaker:

Trades was far from ideal. But bringing it inside the ministry means workers will not be involved

Speaker:

in any way. This includes safety issues, certification requirements. All of this will be decided by

Speaker:

a minister. who will not necessarily have, and most likely will not have, any lived experience

Speaker:

in the trades. He's also cut over 16 million dollars just to the Ministry of Labor overall.

Speaker:

This is a department that is specifically tasked for looking at occupational injuries, illness,

Speaker:

and death prevention. One of the worst bills to pass for the construction industry was Bill

Speaker:

47. and like all of their stupid bills, they have the worst names. This was the Making Ontario

Speaker:

Open for Business Act. So there was a lot amended. It was under this act that the Ontario College

Speaker:

of Trades and Apprenticeships was dismantled and redistributed. But one of the things that

Speaker:

also happened here was that they changed the ratio between journey persons, you might know

Speaker:

them as journeymen, versus apprentice for the trades. He, for all of the trades, he set it

Speaker:

at one to one. So... Obviously, again, this is a move to allow employers to save on labor

Speaker:

costs, because what they'll do is they'll be able to hire more apprentices than they had

Speaker:

previously at a lower rate, with fewer obligations to retain the more experienced journey persons,

Speaker:

who obviously get paid a higher rate. The purpose of the ratio wasn't just to protect the seniority

Speaker:

of workers who get paid more, but it was a safety mechanism. These are inherently dangerous jobs.

Speaker:

A construction worker is the single most dangerous job in Canada. What journey persons do and

Speaker:

what that experience does is the apprentices, they keep the apprentices safe. At least that's

Speaker:

the idea. The more experienced hands you have on a project, the safer those apprentices are,

Speaker:

the safer the whole site becomes. Now a foreperson and like the one safety worker on site are

Speaker:

not enough eyes to make sure that each worker is doing the things that they're supposed to

Speaker:

be doing in the correct way. A lot of these folks, a lot of these apprentices are doing

Speaker:

very dangerous things, sometimes for the first time. Advocates within the industry were very

Speaker:

cautious of a one-to-one ratio. However, it didn't really have the backing of the unions

Speaker:

like they're supposed to. Notoriously, the unions that represent construction workers here in

Speaker:

Ontario are all in the pocket of developers. Their interests don't really differ from developers

Speaker:

at all. They do so little for their workers. Worse. we often find them campaigning or endorsing

Speaker:

conservative candidates like Doug Ford. So unfortunately construction workers aren't very well represented

Speaker:

by the people that are supposed to be protecting them. And they're sure as hell not being protected

Speaker:

by Doug Ford and the Ministry of Labor. Because in the year where there were the highest amount

Speaker:

of deaths, 25 construction deaths here in Ontario, and that's just at construction sites specifically,

Speaker:

there were over, in that year there were over six thousand complaints made to the Ministry

Speaker:

of Labor in relation to workplace health and safety. And only four work refusal orders were

Speaker:

issued. So that pretty much means the Ministry of Labor only found there were four sites in

Speaker:

all that year in all of the province that didn't that weren't safe enough to be working at.

Speaker:

This is despite 25 workers dying and the injuries in the tens of Although we tell workers that

Speaker:

they have the right to refuse safe work, that isn't the reality. So, on top of the Ministry

Speaker:

of Labor pretty much ignoring most complaints, we all know that reprisal is the reality of

Speaker:

a workplace as well. That being the person to complain or to issue a complaint, to ask for

Speaker:

safer conditions on a work site is not going to get you brought over to the next job. It's

Speaker:

not going to keep you with your crew. And so the workplace attitudes that exist on construction

Speaker:

sites really do play into it. And so it's absolutely essential that folks continue to look at the

Speaker:

mechanisms that exist in these workplaces in order to lower those deaths. Another way that

Speaker:

Ford has really shown his disdain for construction workers, or rather his proximity to developers,

Speaker:

because folks need to understand, construction is a huge industry, Canada-wide, globally,

Speaker:

I'm sure, but in Ontario. This is like a $50 billion part of our GDP. It's about 8% of the

Speaker:

Canadian GDP overall. And so on top of Ford being really close with these developers, it's

Speaker:

essential the way that we structured our economy. So when the premier pretended to lock the province

Speaker:

down in response to COVID, he ignored the construction sites. He deemed them almost all essential,

Speaker:

even parking garages and condo buildings. were continually built with very little safety precautions

Speaker:

added to them at all. I've described on another episode how you would go to some sites and,

Speaker:

you know, it's a tiny shared washroom, a porta potty quite often. Hot water and soap aren't

Speaker:

exactly readily available, the mask mandates were not enforced, and so construction workers

Speaker:

have been left particularly vulnerable during that time. And as with all of the other things

Speaker:

that have occurred with construction industry, the union has not been particularly helpful

Speaker:

to them. And the way we pick our rants has us most riled up in that week, right? I can't

Speaker:

possibly fit into an episode, all of the things that I'm upset about. But this one hit particularly

Speaker:

close to home because of the amount of years that Mai has been spent at construction sites.

Speaker:

He was a carpenter on large commercial builds, sometimes residential builds, but always...

Speaker:

almost always high rises and workplace injuries and death are commonplace on the construction

Speaker:

site. There would be no shortage of stories and in fact it wasn't all that long after he

Speaker:

started while he was definitely still an apprentice that my husband was sent to the hospital with

Speaker:

a massive cut on his leg from some power tool close to some artery and you know it really

Speaker:

shook him. That was very soon after he started and The small injuries were constant and in

Speaker:

fact, you know, he's on disability now. But death was also something that he witnessed

Speaker:

on the job. Not super up close, thankfully, but you know, one was from falling debris at

Speaker:

the site, not secured properly in a gust of wind falling down below. And the second was

Speaker:

a worker crushed by concrete forms that they had been building. just as my husband was on

Speaker:

the other end of the same site at the same time. It really impacted a lot of the workers there

Speaker:

for obvious reasons, but some workers had to continue working almost right away. The immediate

Speaker:

site was closed off for a short period for some investigative process, but it was a three-tower

Speaker:

build that resumed the next day. A small fundraiser, I remember being held amongst the workers.

Speaker:

I don't know of any outcome of any inquest, which probably hasn't even happened yet. And

Speaker:

I don't know what kind of compensation, if any, the family received or what honours were provided

Speaker:

to that worker from the province. But that isn't the case when all workers die in the job, though,

Speaker:

is it? It's not the case when cops die. We see elaborate funerals, closed off streets, news

Speaker:

reports might even be televised live. It's attended by d- dignitaries, right? It is an occasion.

Speaker:

There are really no expenses spared. Now most police forces actually refused to disclose

Speaker:

how much they spend on police funerals but the CBC was able to find out that one police services

Speaker:

spent about a quarter of a million dollars on one funeral. It was two hundred and forty something

Speaker:

thousand dollars and of that a hundred and ninety one thousand seven hundred and ninety two dollars

Speaker:

and fifty six cents. went to pay cops premium pay just to attend the funeral. And that's

Speaker:

really ironic, especially when it occurs even under governments that pretend to be penny

Speaker:

pinchers of sorts. One has to ask themselves why. Why the province, why the police forces

Speaker:

make sure to mark these deaths in a very elaborate way and issue recommendations and funding and

Speaker:

training associated with making sure that doesn't happen to another cop. Some of you will have

Speaker:

an answer, obviously. You know that it's because in large part, their power, their ability to

Speaker:

exploit us, is maintained by the presence of a police state. It's important that the police

Speaker:

are seen as important, as an essential service, as heroes, in order to keep up the entire illusion.

Speaker:

It's also important to maintain these police budgets. We will fund heroes. We will spare

Speaker:

no expense. for police budgets that actually protect the powerful and the system that benefits

Speaker:

them. But the cost is the tell-all reality though, right? Because under these austerity regimes

Speaker:

where conservatives will cut any budget in sight, often arbitrarily with no thought of consequence,

Speaker:

they continue to increase police budgets and spend a fortune on their funerals. Police is

Speaker:

like the 17th. most dangerous job in Canada. It's somewhere between electricians and auto

Speaker:

mechanics. So no one's saying it's not dangerous at all. I mean, these are typically hyped up

Speaker:

individuals running around with weapons in fast cars. So I'm not surprised that they're in

Speaker:

the top 20. But if you compare them to the folks that they're on either side of, they have double

Speaker:

the median wage of the trades folks that face far more dangerous circumstances. You know,

Speaker:

your median wage for construction worker in Ontario or in Canada is about $22. And for

Speaker:

a cop it's $46. Obviously that's a median so they get paid lower and higher than that, but

Speaker:

you know it's just the way that we put them in prominence both in what we pay them and

Speaker:

how we treat their safety. These folks are provided with extensive continuous training and all

Speaker:

the safety equipment and weaponry one needs to storm a small city while the rest of us

Speaker:

can't even get fucking paid sick days during a pandemic. And none of this, none of this

Speaker:

is unique to Ford and his progressive conservatives. All of our governments are making policy choices

Speaker:

that have led to lowered life expectancy in Canada. Right? In the last three years, that

Speaker:

number has gone down. And that is because our so-called leaders do nothing but facilitate

Speaker:

the needs of capital in the most reckless ways, like ending mandatory coroner's inquest into

Speaker:

construction deaths. But I think one of the things that we need to get used to. in this

Speaker:

late-stage capitalism is the removal of all facades. The masks, as they say, are off. And

Speaker:

the policies we are seeing and the global carnage we are witnessing are all evidence of that.

Speaker:

There is no hiding their indifference to the suffering of the working class. And as with

Speaker:

almost all of the issues facing us, the only solution is organizing, and more organizing.

Speaker:

So until next time, keep organizing. That is a wrap. A very big thank you to the producer

Speaker:

of our show, Santiago Helu-Quintero. If you'd like to help us continue disrupting the status

Speaker:

quo, please share our content. And if you have the means, consider becoming a patron. So until

Speaker:

next time, keep disrupting.